Sunday, August 06, 2006

Levinson Demonstrates Discrepancies in Quran


The above jpg is a toilet. The object in the toilet is a Quran. Now why would I do something as politically incorrect and disrespectful as place the religion of peace's so-called holy book in the toilet?


Of course I cannot speak for others in Western Civilization, but I am fed up with all the demand for respect from Mohammedans when the nature of their holy book and their hadiths and their sharia law is to impart violence and death. This is particularly true if one disagrees with the tenets of Mohammedanism.


In light of my lack of a benevolent attitude (which I have to check for Christians should not render evil for evil), I found a short comparison by Bill Levinson on Israpundit. Levinson entitled his post, "Mohammed’s Daily Drivel: Readings from the Holy Koran". Below are his insights:
******************

Falsis in unum, falsis in omnibus (false in one thing, false in all) is an old Roman legal principle. Although it is in poor taste to express lack of respect for any genuine religious faith, we are now convinced that the Koran and fundamentalist “Islam” are entirely the product of a self-serving and probably illiterate desert bandit chief who may have been high on drugs when he spewed his Suras. The fact that the Koran contradicts its own content is enough cause to condemn it as a fraud under “Falsis in unum, falsis in omnibus.”


The Koran is indeed self-serving and its most intelligent content is the definition of Hebrew and Christian patriarchs and prophets as Muslims. It is brilliant propaganda whose obvious purpose is to win Jewish and Christian converts. Per Sura III, “The Family of Imran,” verse 60, “Abraham was neither Jew nor Christian; but he was sound in the faith, a Muslim.” This sura also says,
And when Jesus perceived unbelief on their part, He said, “Who will be my helpers with God?” The apostles said, “We will be God’s helpers! We believe in God, and bear thou witness that we are Muslims.”

Sura II “The Cow,” says,
Were ye present when Jacob was at the point of death? when he said to his sons, “Whom will ye worship when I am gone?” They said, “We will worship thy God and the God of thy fathers Abraham and Ismael and Isaac, one God, and to Him are we surrendered (Muslims).”

We must give a tip of the hat to Mohammed for this piece of brilliance, because it does in fact allow Muslims to appeal successfully for Christian and Jewish converts. However, we will now show that Mohammed (or whoever transcribed his statements) made a devastating mistake that exposes the Koran as a fraud as opposed to a divinely-inspired writing.

A witness who makes two contradictory statements damns himself as unreliable at best and a perjurer at worst. A supposedly-holy or divinely-inspired book like the Koran that contridicts itself proves itself to be a fraud: no work of God or a divinely-inspired prophet, but the creation of a self-serving phony like a televangelist or medicine show proprietor.

Per Sura I (”The Cow”),

Verily, they who believe (Muslims), and they who follow the Jewish religion, and the Christians, and the Sabeites– whoever of these believeth in God and the last day, and doeth that which is right, shall have their reward with their Lord: fear shall not come upon them, neither shall they be grieved.

However, per Sura IX (”Immunity”),
The Jews say, “Ezra (Ozair) is a son of God;” and the Christians say, “The Messiah is a son of God.” Such the sayings in their mouths! They resemble the sayings of the infidels of old! God do battle with them! How are they misguided!They take their teachers, and their monks, and the Messiah, son of Mary, for lords beside God, though bidden to worship one God only. There is no God but He! Far from His glory be what they associate with Him!”

Furthermore, per Sura V (”The Table”),
O believers! take not the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you taketh them for his friends, he surely is one of them! God will not guide the evil doers!

SO HOW DO YOU WANT IT, MOHAMMED? “Verily, they who believe (Muslims), and they who follow the Jewish religion, and the Christians, and the Sabeites– whoever of these believeth in God and the last day, and doeth that which is right, shall have their reward with their Lord…” or “O believers! take not the Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If any one of you taketh them for his friends, he surely is one of them! God will not guide the evil doers!” Falsis in unum, falsis in omnibus.
 
There is a story to the effect that Yasser Arafat told his followers to ignore anything he said in English and to pay attention only to what he said in Arabic. His English statements were taqqiya or deception for the infidels while his Arabic statements were his actual agenda. We suspect that Mohammed’s first statement, about Jews and Christians who believe in God being rewarded, was solely for the benefit of us infidels and kafirs while the second, about not taking Jews or Christians as friends, was for Mohammed’s followers. Whoever transcribed his demagoguery and ravings made the mistake of recording both statements in the same book.

The bottom line is that the so-called “Holy” Koran is, per its own content, a fraud. It was not inspired by God. It was written, or more likely dictated, by a self-serving desert bandit who was engaging in the kind of dramaturgy and histrionics with which demagogues have gulled superstitious followers since the dawn of history.

This is not to say that Islam, as it evolved and is now practiced in civilized countries like the United States, is bad or evil. Peaceful and productive Muslims do not take the Koran literally. Only fundamentalist “Islamic” barbarians take the Koran literally while using it to justify horrific atrocities against anyone they consider an unbeliever. And only primitive superstitious barbarians could possibly take the calculated demagoguery of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seriously– which is exactly what makes him so dangerous.

No comments: