Monday, March 30, 2009

UN council votes to criminalize 'defamation' of Islam

Here is an ACT! For America email alert showing that Islam is making a notorious effort to dhimmify the globe. By “dhimmify” I mean the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is wielding its oil and U.N. membership to make it illegal to criticize the Theo-political religious cult known as Islam (and which I prefer to call by its founder ergo Mohammedanism).

Of the forty-seven member
U.N. Human Rights (totalitarian) Council a majority of nations actually voted to criminalize criticism of Mohammedanism. I am guessing the thirteen members that abstained mostly did so out of the oil fear/Islamic terrorist connection. At least most of the Western nations stood by Free Speech. Eleven Western nations stood up for Free Speech.

So of the forty-seven member council
23 voted to criminalize criticism of Mohammedanism and 24 members did NOT vote for the criminalization of criticism of Mohammedanism.

JRH 3/30/09

UN council votes to criminalize 'defamation' of Islam

ACT! For America
Email Sent: March 30, 2009 11:12:24 AM

It’s been brewing for some time. Muslim countries have been pressing for a United Nations Human Rights Council resolution calling on nations around the world to pass laws criminalizing the alleged “defamation” of religion – specifically Islam.

This week the Council passed the resolution.

The good news is that Western nations and over 100 faith groups opposed this resolution. The bad news is that efforts by the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) have paid off in getting such a resolution passed – and we can count on the OIC to continue its global campaign to criminalize free speech that allegedly “defames” Islam.

This is not the only tactic the OIC is pursuing in this regard. At last year’s OIC conference, the conference supported efforts to look for legal strategies to fight back against the alleged “defamation” of Islam. Translation: lawsuits around the world funded by petrodollars.

Maybe America Needs a BNP

I just finished reading a tirade from a blogger upset that the British National Party (BNP) members are being selectively banned from jobs and governmental services.

Evidently the BNP has a historical timeline that goes back to thuggery aspects of pro-Nazi and Hitler-philes. This means the BNP heritage is a history of white supremacy and anti-Semitism.

Apparently the BNP has disavowed that past in their official writings but now take a controversial stand of anti-immigration. The focus of this anti-immigration is the growing population of Mohammedans in the UK.

The BNP anti-Mohammedan immigration stands no doubt derive from Britain diluting British rule of law by allowing Sharia Law courts to have legal jurisdiction over the culturally Mohammedan. Incredibly the Sharia Law acquiescence is even supported by the England’s State Church – The Church of England (aka Anglican Church and in America the Episcopalian Church).

Since the Brits have adapted the continental European stand that speaking against a religion is hate speech, an anti-Mohammedan immigration stand is considered racism by the government.

The HUGE irony is that Mohammedan mullahs and apologists speak the most vile hate speech first against Jews and next against practicing Christians. The British government and EU government nary lift a hand against the Mohammedans that preach their hatred of Jews and Christians.

Robert Locke
writing for Think-Israel gives a good history of the BNP racist past. Now check this out: Locke is not sympathetic to the BNP past however he views the current BNP stand against Mohammedanism as something Israel should promote. There is an understanding that Mohammedanism has zero in common with the Liberty and Rights that exists in Western nations (and America in particular).

Since the BNP has a racist past and has renounced anti-Semitism, white supremacy and the fascist leanings of neo-Nazism; today the BNP is still a racist party by virtue of repatriating and preventing future Mohammedans from the UK.

Due to this media portrayal of racism there is a movement
to ban BNP British citizens from certain jobs such as the police, nurses and the Anglican clergy.

Imagine that: A British citizen this wishes to uphold the British tradition of the rule of law or worship and minister for the Christian God are being prohibited from their positions. Could it be the traditional power brokers of Britain are trying to ensure the BNP’s growing popularity does not turn into British votes that translated into MPs in Parliament? I ask this question for the website for
BNP is more popular than the power broker political parties combined.

Under the Obama Administration is this the kind of dilution of Liberty to expect in America?

Read the anger of the British citizen. (Do note this blogger oozes a bit of the BNP white supremacist past while simultaneously realizing the threat of Islamic culture to Western culture.)

JRH 3/30/09

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Administration will pay welfare to terrorists

This should be no surprise now that President Barack Hussein Obama is moving America deeper into a socialistic welfare State in which Latin American illegal immigrants receive benefits that American citizens do not.

The Obama Administration is going to
settle some of Gitmo’s anti-American Islamic terrorists in the U.S. of A. and allow them to be on the full package government dole.

JRH 3/29/09

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Of Innocents and Savages

Here is something to think about from Leslie J. Sacks.

The topic is threefold: Congo genocide, Gaza Arabs and the Jews of Israel.

JRH 3/28/09

Friday, March 27, 2009

Defying and Defeating Barack Hussein Obama’s Dhimmipolitik

Gary H. Johnson, Jr. is a compendium of information. His blog is United Against Islamic Supremacism.

Wow! I actually did not read this until I cross posted this at Mr. Johnson has found an awesome way to write about what is ailing America: Evolving socialism, devolving Capitalism, emerging Marxist dictatorship, Surrender to Islamic enemies, Stealth Jihad, Sharia Compliant Banking, Islamic Supremacism, Dhimmitude and more.

This is the first time I have read the word “Dhimmipolitic.” I can’t wait to absorb the information in this essay surrounding that word.

JRH 3/27/09

Jack Bauer meets Barack Obama ... or does he?

Okay, I’m a huge fan of the FOX television show “24.” With much wit that should cause readers to think, Diana West combined some fiction with the actual words of Barack Hussein Obama.

Ka-chunk, ka-chunk, ka-chunk … This takes place between America’s road to dhimmitude and Iran’s jubilation.

JRH 3/27/09

Jack Bauer meets Barack Obama ... or does he?

By Diana West
March 27, 2009 / 2 Nisan 5769
Jewish World Review Editor's note: While the "24" references and characters below are fictional, the message to Iran attributed to "the President" below is directly quoted from President Barack Obama's message to Iran of March 20, 2009.

The following takes place in an unseen episode of "24."

Tony Almeda, glowering, is watching the President live on a television in a coffee shop across the street from the White House.

The President (on screen): "In particular, I would like to speak directly to the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Nowruz is just one part of your great and celebrated culture...."

Without taking his eyes off the screen, Tony punches in a number on his cell.

Jack Bauer answers. "Yeah," he breathes, also watching the president on a mirror server uploaded to his monitor.

The President: "Over many centuries, your art, your music, literature and innovation have made the world a better and more beautiful place...."

Tony: "Are you watching the President?"

Jack, making his way to his car as he downloads a frame grab to his PDA: "Copy."

Tony, walking toward the White House: "What's he talking about, 'innovation'? Does he mean the high-tech armor-piercing roadside bombs Iran "innovated" to kill and maim hundreds of U.S. troops in Iraq?"

Jack, now speeding across the 14th Street Bridge into downtown Washington: "Copy. And notice the specific reference to 'the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran.' The president is directly addressing A-jad and the mullahs, and thus in some unprecedented way America is now legitimizing the 1979 Khomeini revolution."

Tony: "Copy that, too. Are you thinking what I'm thinking?"

Jack: "Copy. No American president would ever, could ever, lower himself and our nation to grovel like this to that vicious Islamic regime. Unless — Tony, someone's gotten to the president. He's in trouble."

Tony, eyes narrowing as he peers at the White House: "Copy."

The President (on Jack's car radio): "We know that you are a great civilization and your accomplishments have earned the respect of the United States and the world...."

Jack parks near the White House and joins Tony by the fence.

Jack: "Someone must be forcing the president to make this broadcast, Tony, forcing him to grovel to the mullah-ocracy. We need weapons, surveillance equipment, thumbtacks, quick." Punches in a number on his cell."

Jack: "Chloe?"

Chloe, also watching the president on television: "Jack!"

The President: "We seek instead engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect...."

Jack: "The president is being coerced into surrendering to Iran."

Chloe: "I know. I'm watching. How else could he talk about 'mutual respect' with a regime obsessed with Holocaust denial, nuking Israel and destroying America?"

Jack: "Copy."

Chloe: "Jack, who could be making the president do this?!"

Jack: "We don't find out for a few more episodes, Chloe. You know that."

Chloe: "OK. Listen, I just accessed encrypted Secret Service bandwidths to confirm the President's children are at school, but what about the First Lady? Do we have a visual?"

Tony, urgent: "Jack, I think I see the First Lady being held by weird-looking hostiles in white coats in that untamed thicket over there."

Jack, looking up: "No, that's just the First Lady with her chefs in the new White House organic vegetable garden. Chloe, I need the most current CIRG logs and recognition codes for entry in the Oval Office."

Chloe: "I'm on it, OK. I've downloaded them to your PDA."

Jack: "Copy. We're on it."

From a duct over the Oval Office, Jack and Tony hear the President wrapping up as Jack noiselessly drills an eyehole in the plaster wall.

The President: "With the coming of a new season, we're reminded of this precious humanity that we all share."

Jack, under his breath: "Precious humanity we share? What about the regime's hanging of homosexuals and stoning-to-death of adulterers? Tony, just recently a 25-year-old Iranian blogger named Omidreza Mirsayafi died during his two-year prison term for 'insulting' Ayatollah Khomeini and criticizing the government."

Tony: "The President must be under incredible duress. We've got to save him."

The President, concluding: "Thank you and Eid-eh Shoma Mobarak."

An Aide: "OK. All clear. Thank you, Mr. President. We'll get you up on YouTube within the hour."

The President: "I want it out on Al Jazeera, too."

Aide: "Of course."

Surreptitiously, Jack peers into the room.

The President: "Thank you all. That was great. I've been wanting to do that for a long time. Now, when is the Islamic Republic of Iran's actual Independence Day — or whatever they call it? Maybe we can send them a cake, or pie, or something."

Tony: "How many hostiles, Jack?"

Jack is still surveying the apparently peaceful scene when the First Lady enters.

First Lady: "Hi, honey. Want some organic broccoli?"

Jack: "No hostiles, Tony. Or maybe all hostiles." Punches in a number on his cell.

"Chloe, download the reverse quadralinear coordinates to my PDA so we can get out of here. The President of the United States just groveled to Iran because he wanted to. And that makes this whole thing one lost episode."


JWR contributor Diana West is a columnist for The Washington Times.
© 2008 (sic), Diana West.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Merriam-Webster Caves into Homosexual Agenda

I received a WallBuilders e-newsletter on March 23, 2009. Here is the first paragraph of that e-newsletter:

The aggressive push to redefine marriage has now moved to the literary arena, and the newest ally in the gay marriage movement is Merriam-Webster's Dictionary.

The e-newsletter goes on about a WorldNetDaily article that exposes Merriam-Webster’s cave-in to the Secular Humanist/Homosexual agenda to transform America away from Biblical Morality toward a relativist morality.

Christian Americans are being duped into letting their children receive relativist morality while anything that is Judea/Christian is frowned upon or downright forbidden in public education.

The result is children growing up with two choices in life: the few hours of the example of their parents or the many hours of educational authority figures and indoctrinated peers.

The Supreme Court decided
prayer in schools was a violation of the government First Amendment edict of not allowing Congress to establish religion and forgetting that Congress can make NO law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. Thus the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ex nihilo created an ingrained twentieth century concept – The separation of Church and State.

I challenge anyone to find the words “separation of Church and State” in the U.S. Constitution. You can believe me and save some time: There ain’t no such thing.

The First Amendment does not separate Christianity from government;
the Amendment merely states the government cannot establish a particular religion as a State religion. And HELLO! The religion the Founding Fathers were talking about was not Islam, Hinduism, Judaism, Buddhism, various and numerous other religions nor the false religion Secular Humanism (which to the extreme is the religion of atheism in the sense of ideology). Nay good citizen, the religion spoken of was Christianity.

Even if a majority of the Founding Fathers were Deists, they were Christian Deists. The moral foundation of Christian principles was to be the rule of law in America. The government simply could not favor a Christian religious doctrine over another in endorsement.

Friends this is not separation of Church and State. (Incidentally the word “Church” implies Christianity as well.) The more the Left in the 20th and 21st century utilize the Judicial System to override American heritage, the more America fulfills the dreams of Secular Humanism and increases the viability to make Christianity slowly illegal. Why? The reason is the mere practice of Christianity will violate the rule of law which an otherwise free speech or free religion would be perceived to incite violence, discrimination or a civil offense against a religion other than Christianity, an atheist, ungodly homosexual practices or whatever Secular Humanism defines as normal relative to the age.

AND NOW the American icon of the English language – the Merriam-Webster Dictionary –
defines marriage as between two opposite sexes (i.e. traditional) AND between Same-Sex couples (Secular Humanism/Homosexual Agenda).

JRH 3/26/09

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Brit Dhimmitude and Hezbollah

Unbelievably the United Kingdom is embarking to legitimize Lebanon’s government within a government – the Islamic Shi’ite terrorist organization with puppet strings to Iran known as Hezbollah.

Britain is now reaching ever higher
on its path to dhimmitude to its Mohammedan population whose Mosques are dominated by radical Islam.

The UK government is attempting to project an image similar with the Brits past terrorists of a political and military wing of the old Irish Republican Army (IRA). I am not too familiar with that terrorist history but off the top of my head it seems the UK government negotiated an end to IRA violence by engaging the political wing of the IRA which in turn influenced the military (i.e. terrorist) wing of the IRA.

In selling this distorted simile of an IRA and Hezbollah to the British subjects, the UK intends to (I am guessing) limit the amount of terrorism on British interests. By extension of the Hezbollah puppet strings to Iran it also implies working a political deal with the psycho Mullahs also of Iran.

Walid Phares writing for
Political Mavens exposes the lunacy behind this British dhimmitude thinking. Take a gander at Phares’ short and to the point post!

JRH 3/25/09 (Hat Tip: JWR)

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

New Pledge of Allegiance

The latest in cool chain email with a Christian perspective of course. Unfortunately since it is chain email I have no idea as to the actual writer other than the claims. My experience is that the claims are dubious or enhanced with each send-link in the chain; nonetheless this is very cool.

JRH 3/24/09

New Pledge of Allegiance

Since the Pledge of Allegiance
and The Lord's Prayer
are not allowed in most
public schools anymore
Because the word 'God' is mentioned...
An amazing 15 yr old child in Arizona wrote the attached.

NEW School prayer :

Now I sit me down in school
Where praying is against the rule
For this great nation under God
Finds mention of Him very odd.
If Scripture now the class recites,
It violates the Bill of Rights.
And anytime my head I bow
Becomes a Federal matter now.
Our hair can be purple, orange or green,
That's no offense; it's a freedom scene..
The law is specific, the law is precise.
Prayers spoken aloud are a serious vice
For praying in a public hall
Might offend someone with no faith at all.
In silence alone we must meditate,
God's name is prohibited by the state.
We're allowed to cuss and dress like freaks,
And pierce our noses, tongues and cheeks.
They've outlawed guns, but FIRST the Bible.
To quote the Good Book makes me liable.
We can elect a pregnant Senior Queen,
And the 'unwed daddy,' our Senior King.
It's 'inappropriate' to teach right from wrong,
We're taught that such 'judgments' do not belong.
We can get our condoms and birth controls,
Study witchcraft, vampires and totem poles.
But the Ten Commandments are not allowed,
No word of God must reach this crowd.
It's scary here I must confess,
When chaos reigns the school's a mess.
So, Lord, this silent plea I make:
Should I be shot; My soul please take!

Gitmo and Wishing Islamic Terrorists Away

I support organizations that are anti-jihadi and pro-security in order for American Liberty to be freely practiced. One of many of those organizations is Move America Forward. Many of these anti-Jihadi organizations operate on a grass roots supply budget as opposed to wealthy Leftists as George Soros or Saudi money funneling to anti-American causes.

MAF (as well this blogger) strongly support keeping Gitmo open. Leftist critics look at Gitmo as a civil rights violation of individuals accused of civilian crimes. Of course this is ludicrous for the thugs in Gitmo are transnational terrorists or possessors of information about transnational terrorism in a war that cannot be defined or measured by the Geneva Conventions.

I mention the
Geneva Conventions because the signatories of the rules of war as applied to POW’s are in a war with Stateless transnational terrorists who have NOT signed the Conventions nor have any intention of doing so.

In essence transnational terrorists are war criminals which no State can be held accountable because of plausible deniability.

These war criminals are conducting a war which Leftists wish to view as civilian crimes accountable to courts which have different rules of law ranging from Western civil rights to totalitarian dictatorships with the lame United Nations as an arbiter of International Law.

Regardless how the Left tries to alter the state of war radical Islam is waging on the West overtly or clandestinely
by utilizing different words to wish the war away, transnational radical Islamic terrorists will be dangerous to Western citizens and the Jews of Israel.

President Barack Hussein Obama has signed the order to close Gitmo. Now the Obama Administration is admitting that some of
those Islamic thugs that deserve no American civil rights afforded to accused common criminals will be released on American soil.

Here is
the MAF email with the usual request for grass roots donations.

JRH 3/24/09

Understanding the Name Martel Sobieskey

I just read an awesome essay by a fellah that calls himself Martel Sobieskey. The name must be a pseudonym or his parents had a good understanding of Muslim aggression against Christianity.

The Frankish leader Charles Martel
decisively defeated Abd-ur-Rahman (aka Abdur Rahman, Abdur-Rahman and other variations) the Muslim (Mohammedan or Saracen) leader in a place in present day France between Tours and Poitiers on October 10, 732 AD.

Charles Martel’s victory abruptly stopped Islamic ravaging of Christian lands from the Middle East through North Africa up to present day Spain.

The “Sobieskey” part of Martel Sobieskey’s name no doubt is from the hero Jan (John) III Sobieski. In late
1683 Sobieski’s smaller force won the day against the brutal Muslim Ottoman Turks who had been ravaging Christian Eastern Europe. Sobieski was not only hailed as the hero of defending Vienna but as a savior of Christendom in all of Europe from Islamic invasions and raiding parties.

Understanding the historical significance of Martel Sobieskey’s enables one to comprehend his theme in the essay “
Demoting Islam’s Religion Status.”

The theme is Islam is NOT a religion in the Western sense of religion. At any rate Islam is NOT a religion of peace, rather Muslim writings obviously convey the image of a religion of war. The mindset of Islam is to transform the globe to Islamic The-political ideology by force or by stealth from within.

Martel Sobieskey expounds a recurring thought by anti-jihadis; i.e. that Moderate Islam is a myth. The reasoning behind calling Moderate Islam a myth is the Muslim writings beginning with the Quran. The Quran is considered infallible by Muslims of strict adherence, moderate adherence and even secular minded Muslims. Thus a true Muslim follows the words of Allah delivered by its prophet Mohammed and the observations of Mohammed’s life by his companions. Whether it is Allah or Mo’s buddies, the picture is that of violence to anyone perceived insulting Islam, its prophet or it Allah. This is not a pretty picture.

I personally lean toward a mixture of disbelief of a Moderate Islam and a reformed Islam. I believe Islam can discover a miracle and join the beliefs of modern global religions, which is a better afterlife through faith or the discovery of Nirvana or Moksha or whatever individual religious experience that releases a person from world thinking which is suffering.

Right now Islam only has a peaceful release for devout Muslims and Jihadist Martyrs of whom many look forward toward carnal pleasures disdained by most religions.

The website
Muslims Against Shariah (Their Blog) proclaims itself to be a reform movement. This obviously an extreme minority of Muslims who may be put to death as Apostates if they lived in Muslim dominated societies.

JRH 3/24/09

Monday, March 23, 2009

Christian Songwriter Ray Boltz Embraces Homosexuality

Here is a story about Ray Boltz – Huge Christian Contemporary Musician – giving into the dark side of homosexuality.

It is old news but it is the first time I have read it. The article I read it from is an online magazine called
The Voice.

For some reason the article isn’t dated; however a quick perusal of the comments suggests The Voice published the story on or before September 24, 2008.

Boltz out himself publicly to a Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender rag called the
Washington Blade.

Boltz says he turned to Christianity to try to overcome homosexual tendencies when he was a young teenager. He eventually married as a Christian heterosexual and produced four kids which are adults now.

Apparently he outed himself to his family which obviously has led to a divorce for Boltz claimed he was living a happy normal homosexual life.

Sadly and Certainly Boltz has provided more ammunition for homosexual activists to attack Biblical Morality which is definitely anti-homosexual lifestyle.

JRH 3/23/09
Christian Songwriter Ray Boltz Embraces Homosexuality

By Sherea Atkins
September 2008
The Voice Magazine

A contemporary Christian songwriter Ray Boltz has embraced the homosexual lifestyle during his coming out journey. His songs were inspiring, patriotic, and encouraged many. Boltz authored 16 albums and enjoyed a nearly 20-year recording career. However, in a lengthy interview with the Washington Blade - a gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender newspaper – Boltz exposed his true lifestyle.

Boltz is a household name for many evangelical Christians, particularly for hits like “Thank You,” “Watch the Lamb,” “The Anchor Holds,” and “I Pledge Allegiance to the Lamb.”

Boltz garnered a handful of Recording Industry Association of America Gold-certified albums, three Dove Awards from the Gospel Music Association and 12 number one hits on Christian radio. Boltz is regarded as one of the better-known singer/songwriters in contemporary Christian music. But after the release of his last album in 2002, and his last tour in 2004, he retired from the music industry and moved to Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.

On December 26, 2004, Boltz disclosed to his wife of 33 years and his four adult children that he was gay. According to Boltz’s own words in The Washington Blade, “It’s hard to say I came out because I didn’t have all the answers. I just admitted what I was struggling with and what I was feeling. It’s hard to go, ‘This is the point where I accepted my sexuality and who I was,’ but I came out to them and shared with them what I’d been going through.”

Boltz’s marriage to his ex-wife was, as he says, largely a happy one. It produced four children — three daughters and a son who are now between 22 and 32 — but family life and going through the motions of being heterosexual wearied Boltz. He describes himself as entering a serious state of depression. He was in therapy for years, taking Prozac and other anti-depressants, and was oftentimes suicidal.

Boltz told The Blade, “I’d denied it ever since I was a kid. I became a Christian, I thought that was the way to deal with this and I prayed hard and tried for 30-some years and then at the end, I was just going, ‘I’m still gay. I know I am.’ And I just got to the place where I couldn’t take it anymore … when I was going through all this darkness, I thought, ‘Just end this.’”

This month the Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) announced Boltz would be giving two concerts at MCC venues in Indianapolis and Washington, D.C., with proceeds to benefit the new direction of Boltz’s musical career. MCC sees its mission being social as well as spiritual by standing up for the rights of minorities, particularly those of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people (LGBT).
Though he’s open to performing, Boltz says he doesn’t plan to let this issue take over his life.

“I don’t want to be a spokesperson, I don’t want to be a poster boy for gay Christians, I don’t want to be in a little box on TV with three other people in little boxes screaming about what the Bible says, I don’t want to be some kind of teacher or theologian — I’m just an artist and I’m just going to sing about what I feel and write about what I feel and see where it goes,” he told the Washington Blade.

Boltz declined to go into specifics about the first time he was with a man, but says he has been dating and lives “a normal gay life” now. He went on to tell the Washington Blade, “This is what it really comes down to: If this is the way God made me, then this is the way I’m going to live. It’s not like God made me this way and he’ll send me to hell if I am who he created me to be … I really feel closer to God because I no longer hate myself.”

The Official Brand and Website of The Voice®. The Voice® is a Christian magazine published by Jonas Clark Communications.

All rights reserved. Copyrights © The Voice magazine.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

London: Did Bush Lie?

I found an article written by Herbert London at the Hudson Institute. London reports on a largely ignored AP (MSM) report about the tons of YELLOW CAKE transported from Iraq to North America in 2008.

Yellow cake may not be a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) but it is the means to progress to nuke WMD.

Just because Saddam Hussein may have not progressed to make nuke weapons does not mean the yellow cake resource was not there to do so. Indeed, President Bush took down Saddam before the psycho genocidal Islamofascist dictator took advantage of his possession of yellow cake.

JRH 3/23/09

Saturday, March 21, 2009

American Tea Party Anthem

Here is an email from Our Country Deserves Better PAC. Well actually it’s an excerpt because the first part of the email is an introduction by the OCDB PAC sender Lloyd Marcus.

Marcus is a singer that has written a song in support of the upcoming tax revolt meetings across the nation called the
American Tea Party on April 15, 2009.

Read Marcus’ message sent by OCDB PAC:

JRH 3/21/09

Friday, March 20, 2009

The Value of Understanding

Leslie J. Sacks has sent what I would call a “What he said” moment to SlantRight. I am convinced it is a piece of writing inspired by President Barack Hussein Obama’s overture to Iran to play “Let’s get together and iron out differences” video pointed toward Iran. The Obama overture has already been gleefully rejected like a blocked hoop shot – in your face – by Iran.

JRH 3/21/09

An Alarming video every Westerner should see

I found this on Tangle courtesy of ACT! For America.

The Tangle Poster wrote this:

Anyone (like Barack Obama) entertaining ideas of western democracies establishing friendly relations with the radicals of the Islamic world should watch this video.While watching the inflammatory rhetoric of the speaker, remember that this is not a Jihadists from Iran but a professor from Kuwait - a country with every reason to be grateful to the USA for liberating it from the tyranny of Saddam Hussein\'s invasion.

JRH 3/20/09

Cruel and Unusual Punishment Video

This is Nonie Darwish at a speaking engagement pertaining to her book “Cruel and Unusual Punishment: The Terrifying Implications of Islamic Law.”

JRH 3/20/09

Darwish: Palestine victim of Arab betrayal

The Western Mainstream Media (MSM): Poor Palestinians living an apartheid lifestyle of Stateless inhuman squalor perpetuated by the evil Israel.

Muslim Middle Eastern nations: Poor Palestinians deprived of their homeland by foreign Jews who forced Palestinians to leave to form a Jewish State.

Emerging attitude of Western governments: Poor Palestinians living in inhuman squalor in a Stateless society administered by the Palestine Authority but under the thumb of Israel. Let’s give the Palestinians what they deserve – a sovereign nation.

NOW here is the truth from a former resident of Gaza currently residing in America.

JRH 3/20/09

Justice Scalia on Roe v Wade

Justice Antonin Scalia speaks in an interview on NRO TV (Uncommon Knowledge) about a few legal issues. The most interesting is his view on Roe v Wade.

JRH 3/20/09 (Hat Tip:
Heritage Foundation)

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Why is the U.S. putting $900,000,000 of U.S. taxpayer wealth in the hands of Gaza terrorists?

Here is a WorldNetDaily plug for Jamie Glazov’s book, “United in Hate: The Left’s Romance With Tyranny and Terror.”

The plug
includes a very good article which I suspect is part of the premise of the book.

JRH 3/19/09

Pastor brutalized by Muslims in Merry ol’ England

As Islamist-American organizations proceed with an agenda to insert Islamic practices above the rule of law in America, expect the so-called religion of peace to perpetrate violence on Christians that speak against Mohammedanism as is happening in the United Kingdom.

JRH 3/19/09

Raw Feed: Skewering Fareed Zakaria’s Rationale

Here are some rough notes from Gary H. Johnson, Jr. pertaining to an article that appeared in Newsweek written by Fareed Zakaria. I say “rough notes” because Mr. Johnson intends to polish his insight into an essay or three.

Johnson brilliantly lays waste to Zakaria’s assertion the West should pony up and just accept Islamism because it is more a local cultural phenomenon than a global phenomenon.

I can say in a very unscholarly way that Zakaria’s assertion is WACK.

Read Johnson’s rough notes and see why.

JRH 3/19/09

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Leftist Diversity Criminalizes Christianity

The Left that is currently in power in Congress has been trying to redefine America’s First Amendment Rights to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of religion for some time. Since the fringe Leftist Dems indeed controls both Houses of Congress, this is a scary proposition.

I have written before about how the Dems wish to make Hate Crimes applicable to diminish Freedom of Speech, particularly to criminalize Biblical Christians for preaching Biblical Morality or point the differences between Christianity and other religions. Yes, the “other religions” is mostly a reference to Mohammedanism (Islam) which is slowly seeping into the West utilizing the Western tolerant legal system to allow violent Mohammedanism to practice above the rule of law of the West.

If the current legislation known as
David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act becomes law, then look for fringe Dems and a the Leftist activist Judiciary to stifle Free Speech of Christians as part of the Secular Humanistic Agenda to make diversity rather than E Pluribus Unum (Out of the many, ONE) the cultural norm in America. To accomplish this agenda the biggest obstacle must be silenced; i.e. those vilified Biblical Christians that are often portrayed as clinging to myths and as poor backward people.

Christian Anti-Defamation Commission (CADC) has been keeping up with the Dem push to alter America’s traditions and dilute the Constitution. A few days ago they published a piece about Nancy Pelosi trying to soften the language of the David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act in order to use smoke and mirrors to trick the opposition to snooze and join Dems in passing this legislation.

Read the CADC’s call for Americans (especially Christian Americans) to wake-up and stand against this heinous act to dilute Free Speech and Religious Freedom.

JRH 3/18/09

More Obama Legitimacy News

Barack Hussein Obama has been sworn into the Office of President of the United States of America. Before that January 20th date there was marginal coverage of President Obama’s obvious cover-up pertaining to his eligibility for the Office of President.

The thing that Conspiracy Theorists should be hopping mad about is that the vale of darkness is not coming from what BHO has some control over. Nay friends, the Federal and State Judiciary, State Secretaries of State, a Hawaiian Governor, Hospitals and related universities are ALL part of a cover-up that by virtue of inaction calls into question President Obama’s legitimacy to his elected Office.

After January 20th the Mainstream Media coverage of the question of BHO status as a Natural Born Citizen has equally vanished adding the mystery of cover-up.

Now it seems only
a few stalwart blogs which have a specific reading constituency and a few out of the Mainstream Media keep plugging along trying to get a Court – indeed – the Supreme Court of the United States to hear their voice.

Of course those who are still pursuing BHO’s legitimacy have an agenda to cause a Constitutional crisis in which the end result is the defrocking of President Obama of his Office. I can join that club; however the real issue is simply affording the American public honest answers to LEGITIMATE questions.

No matter if the answers are favorable or unfavorable for Barack Hussein Obama; the actual litmus test is the authority and viability of the U.S. Constitution as the frame work for the rule of law in America.

This multi-level of private, academic institutional, hospital, State and Federal government cover-up raises an implication that everyone’s hoped for Obamasiah is a man that does not honor his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

If President Obama does not honor his oath, what does that say about his intentions to transform America to the Left no matter the opposition as well as his commitment to America’s National Security at home and abroad?

WorldNetDaily (WND) is one of those out of the Mainstream Media outlets that are definitely not respected by Leftist and there are a significant amount of centrists and Conservatives that question WND’s quality of information. I for one trust the angle of WND and I certainly doubt this media outlet does any worse on the political Right then say the New York Times does on the political Left. There is an old saying about processing information: Be at least as smart as a cow; eat the hay and spit out the sticks. I suspect that is an axiom that could be applied to the entire political spectrum. One stick you should spit out immediately is that any form of media is unbiased. Those days are gone.

Even Fox News that bills itself as “fair and balanced” is obviously leaning toward the Right. Thank God they do. At least there is another MSM angle for people to find some good hay to eat to distinguish form the sticks in most of the Slanted Left MSM.

Anyway … Getting back to BHO’s legitimacy to be President; I read a WND article of the latest efforts to discover that legitimacy.

Evidently a gal lawyer from the State of California managed to get into a lecture given by Chief Justice John Roberts at the University of Idaho. Attorney Orly Taitz pressed the Chief Justice about the BHO eligibility to be President. She got a promise from the Chief Justice in front of witnesses that included people of State and Academic stature to look into the Obama mystery.

Take a moment and
read the WND REPORT.

JRH 3/18/09

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Europe hedges on Guantánamo detainees

President Obama is all hot to close Gitmo to make the Lefties in America and Europe ecstatic that these poor radical (most of them) Islamic terrorists should be released.

Check it out! The Lefties in Europe are not so hot to be recipients of Gitmo’s dark murderers from Islam.

JRH 3/17/09

JudgeBob: Me Judging Me

This is an excellent essay by JudgeBob about introspection for life to be a better quality individually and thus benefitting American society as a whole.

The one angle JudgeBob does not mention the ideology known as Secular Humanism.

In my opinion it is the blight of Secular Humanism that has diluted American values and question the Christian values inculcated from America’s foundation.

JRH 3/17/09
Me Judging Me

March 16, 2009

Introspection: a reflective looking inward : an examination of one's own thoughts and feelings

Part of the necessity of life is to examine one's own behavior. We all recognize the personal benefit in this exercise. Jesus required us to go a step further and examine our thought-life. Judging one's own behavior and thought-life help us improve our lot in life. What I wanted to consider is the benefit to society. In the interest of solidarity, I'm sticking to behavioral concerns. Let God judge the heart, we have to judge behavior. Behavior is a result to a great extent, of our introspection. We must constantly evaluate and modify our behavior according to our set of personal standards. This introspection is motivated most often by those around us. We feel the judgment of others and in many cases that judgment comes with consequences. We might be rejected as a friend, we might be fired from our jobs, we might even be forced to deal with divorce proceedings. In every relationship, we are required to examine our behavior and the standards which drives it.

In a chat-room, a young woman related to me that she'd had an abortion years earlier and knew that God had forgiven her but she couldn't forgive herself. She asked for my advice on what she should do. Guilt is a special topic all on it's own. Suffice it to say that true guilt is hard to overcome. God makes known his heart by giving us a conscience and conscience is a terrible punisher. I know guilt similar to the guilt demonstrated in that young woman's story. I worked through it by counsel from a Christian brother. He said to me, "If you were the only sinner on earth, Jesus would have hung on that cross for you alone. If God considers you valuable enough to send His Son to die on a cross to save you and He has decided to forgive you, who are you to overrule His decision? Do not consider your judgment concerning your guilt or worth more valid than God's judgment of your guilt or worth." I don't know how unbelievers deal with this kind of guilt. It's too overwhelming to work through without God to overrule my self disgust and self loathing.

Not everybody has guilt this deep. In some ways this is good, in others this is bad. On the one hand, we all know that we are imperfect and screw up on a regular basis. This means we can identify with one another in our brokenness, so we aren't inclined to go around condemning one another for our little mistakes. We express grace and patience toward one another with this attitude. That grace only goes so far. That is to say, it only goes as far as we can identify with another's brokenness. Anything 'worse' than we can identify with and we are quick to condemn another. So, our experience with guilt is the depth to which we naturally express grace and patience. On the other hand, with grace and patience there is another danger. That is, we can embrace our brokenness and celebrate something our conscience screams against. Within our culture are entire subcultures built on this celebration of brokenness, be it homosexuality, gang violence, recreational drug use, dominant/submissive sexual relationships, racism, or just about any wrong you can name.

This is why, in our brokenness we need an external guiding standard of behavior. Society provides these standards through our laws and traditions. I submit to you that our country was founded on the laws and traditions of the church as articulated in the New Testament of the Bible. Since 1963, our courts have been used to whittle away at our dependence on the Bible for our standards. With those standards out of the way, our traditions are crumbling away as well. The result is not that we are moving away from religion. Instead, people are turning to other venues of worship including communism which worships government and humanism which worships the most intelligent of people. People may be intelligent without being wise.

These trends are destroying the hope of our continued existence as a nation. I call on you to judge right from wrong and good from evil. The first step in social recovery is personal introspection and modification of personal behavior. The next step is to get involved anywhere you can to make a difference for our future, and for the well being of our children. Consider again what happens without those traditions. Guilt is a motivator in one of two ways. Either the guilty will excuse their behavior and make a point of making that behavior obnoxious, even violently defending it and insisting society accept it as right and normal, so somebody will correct and guide them to moral certainty, or they self condemn and set to work attempting to make up for their wrongs never feeling as though they've done enough. Either of those venues are deeply motivated sometimes going into the origins of their thought patterns. So deep, the guilty could not explain or often even recognize their behavior as self destructive.

My own behavior was among the first description of the guilty. I chose to be an appeaser and people pleaser thinking others could make me feel worthy if they would just accept me on my merits. Remember that guilt is self destructive. No matter which venue you choose to assuage your guilt, you undercut your own goals acting in ways you don't understand and can't explain for yourself. If you choose to correct yourself (and few do) you couldn't though peace of mind is dependent on it. I repeatedly undermined my own efforts to make myself acceptable to society. Once I released that guilt (in my case by turning it over to God) those behavior patterns were defeatable. Below is the link I sent that young woman to after telling her my story of being led through my own guilt. If you are dealing with guilt you can't manage, seek a councilor.

Generation after generation are now being taught through state run schools that we cannot judge people. Worse, they are promoting some of the sub-cultures identified by their self destructive behavior created by this mass exodus from judgment. The result is a generation that is growing amoral and raising the next generation which is taught less morality than were their parents. As societies grow and change, the less standards and tradition they retain the more change and change in this sense means instability and violence. Civility is dependent on communal trust and trust is dependent on civility. Break either side of that scale and the society collapses or is defeated by an outside power.

Looking at our national behavior, we can observe in the news, through polls, studies, and current events what percentage of us retain the ability to live by our society's standards and which are using our society's courts and legislature to reduce those standards. Example after example demonstrate we are a declining nation. From the attacks on our rights to speech and self defense, to the attacks on our institutions of moral anchoring, whether successful or not, the attempts are indicators in the condition of our trust, civility, and traditions. At present, the signs indicate an even split and oddly enough, most of one frame of mind are in one party and most of the other frame of mind are in the other party. The pundits call this political polarization. I suggest you take a look at the history of the parties. Consistently, one party has demonstrated a propensity to block what is right, good, and beneficial while promoting what is self destructive to the individual and to the nation. You'll be amazed to learn which party was born on the premise of freeing the slaves, which initiated the parks system, which elected the first black, the first woman, the first... you'll be amazed.

What's the answer? What do we do about our slide into immorality? The good news is, truth wins out. In every case, eventually truth wins. Whoever and whatever organization is on the side of truth will eventually win and whoever or whatever organization which sides with the wrong will lose. If you value traditions and civility and trust, you must get out there and make yourself heard. The other side is certainly being heard. You need to find organizations which support your values and volunteer to help them in their cause. You have to do your part to make morality desirable. If there aren't any organizations addressing your concerns, create one. This is how we keep and grow the republic the founding fathers handed us. You have to judge your neighbor and call them into the morality that anchors this society. You have to judge yourself and ensure you are living up to the standards you promote. You have to shed any unmanageable guilt in that endeavor.

Sea Also: "Me Judging You."



Monday, March 16, 2009

Shoher Tactics for Islamic Terrorism

Here is an interesting theory on executing a war on terrorism when there is so much public support for the terrorists a “Collective Liability” should apply to civilian supporters of terrorism. It is a portion of a chapter from a book entitled “Samson Blinded: a Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict” by Obadiah Shoher.

Evidently Shoher is a pseudonym.
Shoher writes in the hyper-militant Jewish style of Rabbi Meir Kahane. Kahane was considered a racist Jew by moderate and Leftists of both Israel and America. The racism stems from Kahane’s writings that definitively proposes a plan to give incentives for Arabs that call themselves Palestinians to vacate the West Bank. Further Kahane’s writings promoted a policy of forcibly expelling West Bank Arabs if they did not leave willing. And even further Kahane promoted transforming Israel (or at least a portion of Israel) from a secular State to a Jewish theocratic State.

Needless to say Kahane was not endeared by Israeli Leftists or politically correct Israeli moderates. Kahane was jailed for his writing and the organizations it formed around Kahane’s extreme thoughts. Kahane even won a seat in Israel’s Knesset; however he was booted out for his views.

Rabbi Meir Kahane became a martyr to his followers when a Muslim terrorist assassinated him (the guy nabbed was acquitted). (Kahane info is thanks to

Since Obadiah Shoher writes in the spirit of Rabbi Kahane, he has chosen anonymity so that lunatic Muslims cannot assassinate him like Kahane.

Shoher’s writing are extreme as the portion entitled “
Collective Liability for Anti-Israel Terrorism”. I know Shoher’s thoughts on rules of engagement with Muslim terrorists and the Muslim population that supports them are definitely not politically correct. I also know if the West (inclusively Israel) cannot wrap their minds around the fact that Muslim terrorists could care less about Western protocols that have led to such war rules as the Geneva Conventions.

Since the Geneva Conventions are not even close to concepts taught by the Quran and Mohammed, Muslim terrorists laugh at any obligation of Western war rules of engagement.

As far as Muslim terrorists are concerned Western concepts of Justice and Civil Liberty are a weakness to be exploited. Hence Muslim terrorists have no qualms of integrating supportive civilian Muslims in their agenda. In essence Muslim civilian support for terrorists by extension makes the civilian a terrorist. If the civilian does not wish the consequences of a terrorist, then the Muslim civilian should renounce Islamic terrorism and aid in eradicating terrorism.

It sounds rough nonetheless battling Muslim extremism in the same way as we do today (particularly with appeasement tactics) will eventually erode Western and American culture into non-existence.

JRH 3/16/09

Ali Sina: Why Diss Islam?

I am not the most respectful person when it comes to intolerant Mohammedanism. I can see how my anti-jihad stand could offend everyday Muslims that are just living their lives awaiting whatever expectation a Muslim (devout or marginal) is waiting for.

On the other hand I really try not to seek out and personally attack Muslim individuals for their beliefs. I try to stick to the facts as best as I know them from the religious documents considered holy by Muslims and by those who have an academic understanding of said documents who are definitely NOT pro-Mohammedan.

Then there is Ali Sina of
Faith Freedom International (FFI). I like Ali Sina however this guy makes no bones about going to the heart of the matter which he has to know will rile up Mohammedans into a state of frenzy. I might point out that Ali Sina probably would be very critical of me for I am a devout Christian Right kind of guy. That means other Christians, atheists and most likely Mohammedans in particular would find uncomplimentary things to say about my beliefs.

Now I cannot state with any certainty but I get the impression that Ali Sina rejects all forms of religion that might crimp the Secular Humanist view of civil rights. I also know that Ali Sina is an ex-Muslim hence he has reserved much of his venom for exposing Mohammedanism and its founder to harsh critical conclusions (which I happen to agree with).

To see what I am writing about you need to read FFI post Ali Sina entitled “
Why Diss Islam?

JRH 3/16/09

Islamic Toleration? NOT

Here is the religion of peace in action.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Bilderberger-Obama Connection?

I really love the speculation involved with Conspiracy Theory (CT). I rarely buy into CT wholesale; however there is always enough data to build one’s pet theory of world domination or making America subservient to a government that shreds the Liberty and Rights of the U.S. Constitution.

Bilderbergers seem to be the top dog in this day and age among others such as the Illuminati, Council and Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and others upon others.

As far as America is concerned a common thread for all these conspiracies is not so much an emphasis on the Slanted Left or the Slanted Right ideologies, indeed the thread is Bi-Partisan.

President G.W. Bush was a target of these conspiracy theories, especially as his popularity began going south.

Now President Barack Hussein Obama is
beginning to get Conspiracy Theorist attention. Well that works for me, I didn’t vote for him.

Check out what the Politico is saying about a Bilderberger-Obama connection and let your mind run wild.

JRH 3/15/09

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Victim History vs. Jihad

Bill Warner has placed a FrontPage interview conducted by Jamie Glazov on his Political Islam blog.

In the interview Warner speaks of a kind of Orwellian new order being placed on America (I would include all Western style Representative Governments). Warner even uses Orwell-speak by calling this emerging new order the “Newstate.”

Essentially the interview line of thought is the “Newstate” is in the tank for Mohammedanism to such a degree that American Free Speech is being anesthetized to squelch anti-Jihad free speech while accommodating Muslim Supremacism in American society.

It is an enlightening interview to read.
I suggest you do so.

JRH 3/14/09