Saturday, May 30, 2009

It Seems Only Democrats can Bork Nominees


Do you know what getting Borked is? That is when a Leftist Senator goes into a conniption when a Justice is nominated for the Supreme Court that is Right of Center or even viewed as further Right than a Leftist can tolerate.

The thing is the word “bork” has entered the world of a dictionary because of the common portrayal of the word to politics or a position in an office. The irony is “borking” seems to apply particularly to a Democrat(s) doing all in their power to prevent a Conservative from attaining an office which in most cases a Conservative is qualified.

The Leftist Democrats have fine tuned the art of borking into an art form. The Left is so well versed on borking that they have developed strategies with their partners the Mainstream Media (MSM) to preemptively propagandize for their far Left nominees to slow down or even prevent Conservatives from borking a Left Wing activist jurist.

If you think I am incorrect just look all the glowing revelry being dished by the Left about an obviously Leftist Judge who believes in the judiciary actively setting policy (i.e. Leftist agenda) rather than interpreting the Constitution. The Left and the MSM are hot to paint a picture to convince the public Sotomayor did not mean what she said about setting policy from the Bench. The Leftist/MSM marriage is portraying Sotomayor as a person raised in poverty in the big city where things were not nice for minorities. Sotomayor is Hispanic (the fasting growing minority in the USA) and managed to make it to the coveted prestige colleges of the Ivy League for an education leading to a Law degree.

Indeed the story is accurate and I agree with the Left that Sotomayor is deserving of adulation for living the American dream of success. I have to tell you though; if a highly qualified individual for SCOTUS is rejected because of his Conservative views then a Leftist should be rejected for the same reason. Do not make the mistake of believing she is moderate Center-Left individual.

Sotomayor is poisoned as a racist from her own lips:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." (AC)


Newt Gingrich brings insight into Sotomayor’s racist statement by reversing subjects of her comments:

"Imagine a judicial nominee said 'my experience as a white man makes me better than a latina woman' wouldn’t they have to withdraw? New racism is no better than old racism.

A white man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw."
(Ibid)


President Barack Hussein Obama has stepped in to defend his choice for SCOTUS Justice:

“There are, of course, some in Washington who are attempting to draw old battle lines and playing the usual political games, pulling a few comments out of context to paint a distorted picture of Judge Sotomayor’s record,” Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address. “But I am confident that these efforts will fail; because Judge Sotomayor’s 17-year record on the bench – hundreds of judicial decisions that every American can read for him or herself – speak far louder than any attack; her record makes clear that she is fair, unbiased, and dedicated to the rule of law.



[Obama schmoozes about Sotomayor personal story – then]



“No nominee should be seated without rigorous evaluation and hearing; I expect nothing less,” Obama said. “But what I hope is that we can avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down this process, and Congress, in the past.”
[PoliticoYouTube]


Can you believe that last quote of BHO? It is the Democratic Party that is the king of ideological brinksmanship by giving meaning to the word “borking.” Indeed then Senator Obama voted against John Roberts as Chief Justice (one of 28 nays) and was highly involved in a borking filibuster against confirming Justice Alito.

So BHO is saying “avoid the political posturing and ideological brinksmanship” of the past. It reads more like avoidance as long as a Democrat President nominates a Justice with a Democrat dominated Senate to me.

Karl Rove weighed in with some Conservative insight about the Sotomayor nomination. Read Rove’s “Empathy' Is Code for Judicial Activism”:

JRH 5/30/09

Friday, May 29, 2009

Palestinian Object: Destroy Israel


Recently defendants that were part of the American-Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation received lengthy sentences for being nailed for sending money to the Arab-Islamic terrorist organization Hamas. Since the Left Press and a huge amount of American slanted Left academia are in the tank for Hamas, the American J.Q. Public may not be aware of the evil that is inherent in Hamas.

Hamas is an Arab-Islamic terrorist group that is committed two objectives: the destruction of Israel along with the Jews living there AND setting up a sovereign Arab State to be called Palestine thus giving an identity to a group of Arabs that has never existed except for the Arab creation of Arab refugees displaced by war. All wars involving Israel were designed by Islamic-Arab nations to bring about a second Jewish holocaust to rival Hitler’s Holocaust. (Hmm … Here is a thought: Maybe the Holocaust denial of much of the Muslim Middle East is due to Islamic Supremacism in that radical Muslims wish the credit for ridding the world of Jews. I have no idea if that is true – I was just thinking out loud.) Ergo all those Arab-Islamic wars were designed to end the existence of Israel. Since all those Arab invasions were lost by the invaders, Arabs became displaced thinking they would swoop back to claim empty Jewish property along with their former domiciles.

Read what Netanyahu.org writes about the wickedness of Hamas:

With these words the Hamas covenant begins: "Israel will exist, and will continue to exist, until Islam abolishes it". This document (which is fully laid out below) is the most important ideological manifest of the Hamas movement's ideals, objectives and methods. It is an extremely radical, racist and violent vision for the Middle East. The Hamas believes that "The Jews are responsible for all wars in the world". One of the more interesting things in the covenant is the kind of Anti Semitic slander that appears in it. They have mixed into their hatred old style European anti Semitic themes such as relying on the infamous "protocols of the elders of Zion" as well as blaming the Jews everything bad in the world. …

No compromise is possible with Israel, "Leaving the circle of the conflict with Zionism is an act of high treason; all those who do this shall be cursed". Short term cease fires like "hudna" or "thadia" are ok by the Koran if they serve to better the positions for the next attack.


You can comprehend why the HLF criminals received such stiff sentences for supporting Hamas. You can also understand the reason that anti-jihadists like Joe Kaufman wish to expose the dangers of Hamas style Islam. Also you can understand the reason why American-Islamic groups with ties to Hamas are trying to silence anti-jihad writers and investigators. The more light shown on the darkness of Islamic support for Hamas will bring more and more scrutiny from authorities on American-Islamic organizations. One American-Islamic organization suffering from public exposure is the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). The FBI which once welcomed CAIR as a partner to understand Islamic culture has been jettisoned because of CAIR’s ties to Hamas.

Leftists in America often grudgingly admit that Hamas is indeed a terrorist organization. After that admission many Leftists then begin to pin their utopian Middle East peace dreams on the Fatah dominated Palestinian Authority (PA). Intrinsically Fatah is the chief among equal Arab terrorist organizations within the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) founded by Yasser Arafat and currently Chaired by Mahmoud Abbas.

The Leftists have talked themselves into believing the PA/PLO Islamic mob are Islamic moderates.

Andrew Bostom has a post on his blog that reminds everyone that the PLO creeps are just more deceptive toward the West than is Hamas. PA/PLO deception is a policy of cozying up to Western governments and Leftists, then turn around at home at pump their constituents with the propaganda of hate that all Islamic terrorists subscribe to.

Bostom wants the reader to note that the Fatah dominated PA is still as racist and determined to destroy the Jewish State and replace with an Arab State as ever.

JRH 5/29/09

Cartoon predicts the future 50 years ago

Here is a video that is a blast from the past – 50 years in the past. It was a time when exposing an evil ideology was considered a virtue and not a hate-crime.

Free Speech and Joe Kaufman


I have been known to post pleas for funds from very legitimate organizations with an agenda to support very legitimate causes.

One such cause is David Horowitz’s Freedom Center legal defense of Joe Kaufman (also posted at Muslims Against Sharia) by Islamic organizations that have used the American criminal and civil legal systems to squelch his Free Speech rights to investigate the evil of Islam.

If those Islamic organizations are successful and bring down Joe Kaufman then look for the next step. That step would be going after people like you and me.

Here is a neutral profile from the Canada Free Press:

Joe Kaufman is the Chairman of Americans Against Hate and the founder of CAIR Watch. He is also an investigative journalist for Frontpage Magazine and the spokesperson for the Terror-Free Oil Initiative.


Now here is the frivolous lawsuit that has no basis to go all the way:

Last year, Joe Kaufman, an American activist and the chairman of Americans Against Hate, traveled to Texas to lead a peaceful ten-person protest against the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), an organization that has been tied to Pakistani radical Islamic groups. During Kaufman's peaceful protest he was served with a harsh temporary restraining order as well as a suit alleging defamation and harassment. What is particularly troubling about Kaufman's case, is that the suit was not filed against him by ICNA, but by seven Dallas area plaintiffs who had never previously been mentioned by Kaufman, nor had they present at Kaufman's protest. The case is currently being litigated in Texas while Kaufman who lives in Florida is forced to spend his own money on travel and hotel accommodations in order to defend his rights to free speech and peacefully assemble. (Frontpage Magazine interview posted at Islamist Watch)


So you can see the tactic. Kaufman has been rather successful at exposing Islamic terrorist connections. American-Muslim organizations that claim to be moderate yet in reality support terrorist organizations such as Hamas have developed a strategy to shut the Kaufman’s of America up. That strategy is to sue with a large amount of financing behind the American-Islamic organizations without any real intention of winning. The object is to drain the anti-Islamist writer or reporter of their own finances by having to pay long arduous legal fees to battle well financed American-Islamic organizations.

Here is an example of the baseless Islamic attack to discredit Kaufman:

Americans Against Hate is an organization that creates slander and uneducated, presumptive allegations that never have merit or truth. Joe Kaufman is a man with a plan to spread lies and hatred toward Islam and creates broad and unfounded accusations that never are logical. Americans Against Hate (AAH) does the exact opposite of what the title and scope of his organization assumes.

[Then a load of smear came against Kaufman because a Left Wing organization denounces Kaufman.]

This is a man (Kaufman) who founded an organization called Americans Against Hate. It's the [...] Oxymoron, because all it does is spew hate!

Americans Against Hate is a website that is created to establish anti-everything that is associated with Islam and Muslims in general. Just like many other self-righteous bigots, Kaufman is considered to be a right-wing extremist with ties to Israeli terrorist organizations listed by the U.S. Department of State, and even has his blog articles prohibited in the Jewish Israeli Magazine due to his loyalties to Kahane Chai and Kach radical groups. (see "A Kahane Legacy Lost" written by Joe Kaufman under radicalwatch.blogspot.com)

[Then this website goes out its way to portray a Hannity and Colmes interview including all the “uhs” and “ahs” of horrible English public speaking.]


Just to contradict the accusation of hate speech or racism against Kaufman let’s read from an Islamic website that is way closer to moderate Islam than are most of well financed Islamist connected American-Islamic organizations.

Muslims Against Sharia rallies with Kaufman about exposing a Muslim on a School Board in Florida who relishes in the glory of Hamas:

On March 1, 2008, Broward County School Board Diversity Committee member Jawhar Sadallah Badran, an appointee of School Board member Robert Parks, was caught on camera making statements in support of the terrorist organization Hamas. They included “Hamas is not a terrorist organization,” “Hamas is a defender of the Palestinian people,” and “Hamas is better than Fatah, because there’s no corruption. Hamas takes care of the people.”

As well, in July of 2006, Badran made a statement to the Fort Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel describing himself as a suicide bomber. He said, “Hamas and Hezbollah are committing acts of defense against the acts of the Israelis. The only weapons that we have are to strap bombs on our bodies and do whatever damage and destruction we can.”

Furthermore, Badran is a representative for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), a group that has a number of terrorist ties. Indeed, the United States Justice Department has recently named CAIR as a co-conspirator for a current federal trial which is dealing with the financing of millions of dollars to Hamas.

We believe wholeheartedly in Freedom of Speech, but because of Mr. Badran’s expressions of support for terrorist organizations and violence and because of his radical affiliations, we feel that he should be disallowed from serving on any government forum, especially one that deals with diversity and children. We therefore are calling on you to act swiftly to remove Jawhar “Joe” Badran from the Broward County School Board Diversity Committee. He should not be able to serve another day.

Source: Petition Online
H/T: Americans Against Hate


Even Muslims that hate their heritage of violence are supporters Joe Kaufman. Does that sound like “hate speech” or “racism”?

Let’s examine the Rabbi Meir Kahane who the American-Islamic terror affiliated organizations are using to character assassinate Joe Kaufman.

In 1985, the Knesset passed an amendment to Israel's Basic Law, barring "racist" candidates from election. The committee banned Kahane a second time, and he appealed to the Israeli High Court. This time the court found in favor of the committee, declaring Kahane to be unsuitable for election. (Wikipedia)


Here is the basis of Rabbi Kahane’s racism. So what was Kahane racism?

Kahane argued that observance of Torah was the only reason to be Jewish. He saw secular Jews as hypocritical racists:



His supporters say Kahane was protecting Torah values and the integrity of the Jewish nation, but his detractors consider Kahane's views bigoted.

Kahane also believed that a Jewish democracy with non-Jewish citizens was self-contradictory because the non-Jewish citizens might someday become a numerical majority and vote to make the state non-Jewish:

    I ask a question that sends Israelis crazy, both on the Left and on the Right. The question is as follows: if the Arabs settle among us and make enough children to become a majority, will Israel continue to be a Jewish state? Do we have to accept that the Arab majority will decide?




Kahane claimed that historically there are no examples of Arab Muslims living peacefully alongside other non-Arab ethnic groups. Thus Kahane proposed the forcible deportation of nearly all Arabs from all lands controlled by the Israeli government.

"A total of some 750,000 Jews fled Arab lands since 1948. Surely it is time for Jews, worried over the huge growth of Arabs in Israel, to consider finishing the exchange of populations that began 35 (50) years ago." (Ibid)


Kahane’s racism was based on his distrust of Muslim-Arabs who are devoted to the extermination of Israel and every Jew residing there. That may sound harsh but self-preservation is hardly racism. Kahane did not call for the extermination of Muslim-Arabs as most of Middle Eastern Muslims are taught to believe for Israeli-Jews.

Now let’s examine the accusation that Kahane was a terrorist.

The movement founded by Kahane became known as the Kach Party and Kahane chai (i.e. “Kahane lives [on]”). Rabbi Kahane was assassinated by an Islamic terrorist well connected to al Qaeda in New York City in 1990. Four years later a Kach supporter by the name of Dr. Baruch Goldstein went on a murder spree at a dual Jewish-Muslim worship location. The incident has become known to Jews as the Cave of the Patriarchs Massacre and to the Muslims as Al-Haram Al-Ibrahemi Mosque Massacre.

Regardless of Palestinian propaganda it has been proven that IDF reservist Dr. Baruch Goldstein acted alone. Even so the Jewish community of Israel and the Jews of the West were so horrified by the massacre that the Kach Party and the Kahane chai were declared illegal terrorists organizations. The U.S. State Department followed through by citing the two Jewish organizations to be on the Terror Watch List.

Now let’s compare acts of terrorism by the Kach Party and Hamas or Fatah (the assassinator of Kahane was a PLO operative as well). There is NO compare available.

So if Kaufman subscribed to the belief that racist Islamic Supremacists should be separate from Jews (and should be separate from all non-Muslims who love their life), how is that an indictment against Kaufman?

JRH 5/29/09

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The Axis is Preparing for Destabilization



In America the word “axis” has often been politically charged to refer to evil nations. Politically an “axis” seems to involve three nations. For example in WWII the Allies (the victors) battled the Axis powers; viz. the Nazi Third Reich, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan.

Most would consider the Axis powers as heinously evil with unwilling Italians be ruled by a Fascist government. Incidentally I say “unwilling” because when it became apparent to the Italian citizens that Benito Mussolini was a mere puppet of Hitler’s Third Reich and Italy was paying dearly with their blood in a losing war; an Italian mob got a hold of Il Duce and lynched him in a public square.

Hitler tried to exterminate all people he considered a stain to the Master Aryan Race. This included as many Jews as the Nazis could find.

Imperial Japan led by dictator Tojo in the name of Emperor Hirohito committed horrendous atrocities against Chinese, Koreans and POW’s. Millions died.

Though Il Duce was a puppet, he did his share of atrocities. One of the atrocities was the invasion of Ethiopia utilizing poison gas to subdue the nation.

President Bush had labeled Iraq, Iran and North Korea as an Axis of Evil.

Saddam Hussein’s Iraq was a genocidal and authoritarian in ways that no doubt would receive a hat tip Der Fuehrer or Comrade Stalin.

The revolutionary Mullahs of Iran purged the nation of all that may have opposed the psycho-Shi’ites grip on power.

North Korea’s Communist family cult regime mask’s their despotism with Communism; however the people are starved, abused, murdered and propagandized resulting in the Kim family retaining absolute rule.

The so-called humanitarian organization that is supposed to battle the Axis of Evil global atrocities known as the United Nations more often than not serves to protect the evil in nations rather than condemn them. For example the United Nations spends volumes on paper condemning the only democratic-minded nation in the Middle East in the sliver of land known as Israel. Yet the amount of condemnation of the brutal practices associated with Islam goes largely unreported. In fact the U.N. is pushing a global agenda to make it against International Law to criticize acts of Islam while looking the other way as Mohammedans do their best to slaughter Jews. Indeed there is nary a U.N. condemnation against the rising return of Jewish anti-Semitism that is emerging Western nations.

Iraq designs of regional hegemony were derailed by President G.W. Bush. Regardless of what you have heard about the lack of finding WMD in Iraq it is documented that huge amounts of yellow cake was transported from Iraq to Canada to keep out of Islamic terrorist hands and for Canada to use it for actual peaceful purposes. If you think psycho-Saddam would not have sought a way to turn yellow cake into some kind of weapon, then you should re-examine the genocide link above.

There is absolutely no doubt in my mind (and Israel’s security apparatus) that Iran is enriching uranium to weapons grade for nuclear weapons. Yet the only thing the world does (sucking up to the U.N. style and oil worries) is write mass papers of condemnation thinking the ink on paper will stop a regime from following through on its very public statements of driving Israel into the sea.

Now Iran is watching with glee as North Korea successfully test detonated a nuclear weapon with the destructive scale that Hiroshima and Nagasaki experienced at the end of WWII.

What was the global response to the Nuke detonation? President Barack Hussein Obama led the way in the usual scary tactic of unleashing a verbal attack that was more likely followed by some official paper with the Presidential Seal on it. I have not sought it out but I would be surprised if the U.N. in their faux position as protector of world peace also wasted some paper devoted to North Korea. In fact knowing that paper does nothing, even Red China denounced the Nuke detonation. O the poor trees. This could set back the Green Movement.

Caroline B. Glick writes about how North Korea’s Nuke detonation, exporting missile technology and the general sales of nuke information is actually an attack on Israel. Do you think that is far fetched? If you do then you are unaware of two psycho-regimes that are buddy in the exchange of weapons technology (no doubt for oil). North Korea and Iran are near kiss'in cousins.

Since it is evident that President Barack Hussein Obama may toss Israel’s National Security under the bus, what Israel have to loose to at least take a shot at Iran’s nuclear industry?

JRH 5/28/09

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

The Lies of Muslim Revisionist History


Mohammedans have been trying to rewrite Israel’s history for years. The religion of peace wishes to extirpate the truth that the land had a Jewish Kingdom by heritage, which included a Jewish capital city called Jerusalem and the claim there was never a Temple built by Solomon and Zerubbabel (modified by Herod).

Ahmed Qurei:

"The world must be mobilized against all these Israeli attempts to change the symbols and signs of Jerusalem," he said. "There is nothing Jewish about the Al Aqsa Mosque. There was no so-called Jewish Temple. It's imaginary. Jerusalem is 100 percent Muslim."


David Hazony reporting on Dore Gold:

There has also been destruction at the level of ideas. As Mr. Gold shows, Muslim and Arab leaders in the past recognized that Jerusalem was the location of Solomon's Temple, but today it has become official policy, taught in schools and backed with pseudo research, that the most sacred place in the Jewish imagination — the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, built by King Solomon and maintained on and off for nearly 1,000 years — never existed. Echoing the Holocaust denial of their Iranian contemporaries, Palestinian leaders, writers, and scholars have embarked on a campaign of intellectual erasure, which Mr. Gold calls "Temple Denial," aimed at undermining the Jewish claim to any part of the land.


This revisionist history is becoming the talking point for the reason of the existence of another psycho-Arab State that would be called Palestine. Since Mohammedan revisionist academics are backed by tons of petro-dollars (especially Saudi Arabia), Leftist academics are willing to back this revisionist lunacy.

Real history shows that there was NEVER a sovereign nation or a land with a heritage called Palestine. There is especially NO record of a Mohammedan nation called Palestine. This land in the Levant dubbed Palestine is a region that has been the object of Conquest for a couple of millennia.

Jewish heritage traces their attachment to the land as a promise given by God to Abraham. Abraham never possessed the promise in his lifetime; however he taught it to his sons (Isaac – the child of promise – in particular). The promise was kept alive by Abraham’s descendants through the lineage of Isaac, Jacob (Israel) and Joseph through the Jewish deliverer Moses.

Moses had become a disgraced shepherd working for his Midianite father when Yahweh (God) spoke to Moses in a burning bush:

7 And the LORD said: “I have surely seen the oppression of My people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows. 8 So I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up from that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey, to the place of the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Amorites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites. 9 Now therefore, behold, the cry of the children of Israel has come to Me, and I have also seen the oppression with which the Egyptians oppress them. 10 Come now, therefore, and I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring My people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt.”


Now some might query, “Why would God get rid of the inhabitants from their own land?” I would even hazard to guess that present day Arabs would say the displaced people residing in the former Canaanland were their Arab ancestors. Of course that is revisionist historical propaganda to portray the concept that Arabs were in the land they now call Palestine and were booted out by Israeli migrant conquerors.

Mohammedan academics are morons. To say in the same breath that there was never an Israeli kingdom and say that Israelis booted Arab ancestors from their land is an oxymoron. Either Israel was there or they were not.

Were the Canaanite inhabitants indeed Arabs? The answer is maybe. Certainly both Arabs and Jews (Hebrews) are Semitic peoples. But this would make the battles between Israeli-Hebrews and the Canaanite inhabitants an internecine war, not a war between Arabs and non-Arabs.

It is no more true that some Israeli-Hebrews displaced some Arab-Canaanites than Mohammed’s Arab’s displaced Jewish-Arab and Christian-Arabs from the Arabian Peninsula. Semites are Semites even if they are a different strain of Hebrew, Arab, Canaanite or whatever. It is more likely that the Canaanites were more separate from the Arabs linguistically than they were from the Hebrews.

It is insane for Arab/Mohammedan academics to thus claim the land was usurped from them by Israeli-Hebrews.

One other point about Israel possessing the Promised Land. Does anyone think that the Israelis were told to exterminate Canaanite people because did not like they smelled or looked? Or perhaps God was embarking on the evil of genocide to keep an Abrahamic Promise? Maybe God felt the Jews were so perfect in appearance and righteousness that he not only gave the Land of Promise to the Israeli-Hebrews but ordered mass genocide to satisfy the bloodlust of a conquering Semitic group over another Semitic group?

Come on Lefties and Jew-hating Mohammedans; give God Almighty a little bit more credit than that. Here is the reason that Israeli-Hebrews received the Land of Promise:

1 “Hear, O Israel: You are to cross over the Jordan today, and go in to dispossess nations greater and mightier than yourself, cities great and fortified up to heaven, 2 a people great and tall, the descendants of the Anakim, whom you know, and of whom you heard it said, ‘Who can stand before the descendants of Anak?’ 3 Therefore understand today that the LORD your God is He who goes over before you as a consuming fire. He will destroy them and bring them down before you; so you shall drive them out and destroy them quickly, as the LORD has said to you.
4 “Do not think in your heart, after the LORD your God has cast them out before you, saying, ‘Because of my righteousness the LORD has brought me in to possess this land’; but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD is driving them out from before you. 5 It is not because of your righteousness or the uprightness of your heart that you go in to possess their land, but because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God drives them out from before you, and that He may fulfill the word which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. 6 Therefore understand that the LORD your God is not giving you this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for you are a stiff-necked people.
(Deut. 9: 1-6)


The Canaanite nations had sunk into a depraved cultural stench that included such acts as temple prostitution and child sacrifice. Are these the people the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians claim as ancestors?

Maybe there is a connection between the Arabs and the Canaanites. Mohammedan Arabs use human shields of men, women and children to fight their Islamic terrorism. Mohammedan Arabs kill themselves and men, women and children in homicidal-suicide bombs to die a martyr to enter paradise to enjoy insatiable sex with 72 voluptuous virgins.

Could it be that the Diaspora of Jews have been coming back to their Promised Land not because of their inherent righteousness and God’s favor, but because the majority of the surrounding people practice a supremacist-racist death-cult that God views as a cup too full of cultural sin?

Part of the Mohammedan quest to eliminate evidence of a Jewish presence is the very thing they accuse Israel of doing; viz. the destruction of artifacts and antiquities that prove the heritage of Judaism. Mohammedans have systematically destroyed Jewish and Christian antiquities and holy sites since modern Israel came into existence.

The existence of a national group of people called “Palestinians” is a propaganda myth (HERE and HERE) that serves only one purpose; i.e. an excuse to perpetually find a way to destroy Israel and as many Jews as can be had.

The attack on Jerusalem’s Jewish heritage is still ongoing through the lying propaganda of revisionist history.

JRH 5/27/09

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

California: Good News/Bad News


John R. Houk
© May 26, 2009


Well here is good news and bad news from the State of California concerning homosexual same-sex marriages.

The State Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the
rights of California State citizens to amend their State Constitution by referendum. Hence Proposition 8 is now the Constitutional law of the State of California defining marriage as between a man and a woman rather than Adam and Steve or Eve and Evilynne.

The bad news is the California State Supreme Court upheld their changing of the law when that
judicial body struck down Proposition 22 defining marriage properly for being a mere initiative thus open for the State Court to counter the will of the people. That means the homosexual reprobates that married between the State Supreme Court fiat and the Constitutional Amendment inherent in Proposition 8 are still legally binding.

JRH 5/26/09
***********************

California court upholds Prop 8

By Ed Morrissey
May 26, 2009 1:25 pm
Hot Air

In what looks like a Solomonic and almost unavoidable conclusion, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that voters in the state properly amended the Constitution to bar single-gender marriage. The ruling signals a victory for democracy over judicial fiat, as Proposition 8 reversed the same court’s declaration of the right to gay marriage. The court split the baby, figuratively speaking, by reaffirming the marriages conducted by California in the interim:

The California Supreme Court today upheld Proposition 8’s ban on same-sex marriage but also ruled that gay couples who wed before the election will continue to be married under state law.

The decision virtually ensures another fight at the ballot box over marriage rights for gays. Gay rights activists say they may ask voters to repeal the marriage ban as early as next year, and opponents have pledged to fight any such effort. Proposition 8 passed with 52% of the vote.

Although the court split 6-1 on the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the justices were unanimous in deciding to keep intact the marriages of as many as 18,000 gay couples who exchanged vows before the election. The marriages began last June, after a 4-3 state high court ruling striking down the marriage ban last May.

In an opinion written by Chief Justice Ronald M. George, the state high court ruled today that the November initiative was not an illegal constitutional revision, as gay rights lawyers contended, nor unconstitutional because it took away an inalienable right, as Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown argued.


The 6-1 split is significant. The previous ruling declaring gay marriage a right under California’s constitution was very narrow. Three of the judges who voted for that decision went the other direction today. They had little choice. California allows constitutional amendments by referenda, and the backers of Proposition 8 followed the law scrupulously in getting it on the ballot.

Confirming the marriages also appears to be the correct decision. When the couples got their licenses and had the ceremonies performed, the law in the state (as dictated by the court) allowed for those marriages. Proposition 8 changed the law, but it cannot apply ex post facto. Since those licenses were valid and backed by the state at the time they were issued, the court had little choice but to approve them — and their unanimous judgment speaks to the common sense conclusion.

However, that does set up an interesting point for a federal appeal. If the plaintiffs in this case argue against this dichotomy on an equal-protection basis, a federal court might find that intriguing enough to consider. Even if that doesn’t work, the plaintiffs plan on a new referendum that will reverse Proposition 8. Something tells me that this will be a more or less permanent feature on California’s ballots for the foreseeable future.

Update: I meant judicial fiat, not legislative fiat. Thanks to RBJ in comments for correcting me.

_____________________

California: Good News/Bad News
John R. Houk
© May 26, 2009
_____________________

California court upholds Prop 8
© 2006-2009 Hot Air Network, LLC

Torture and Gitmo!

I wish I had seen this video when torture and Gitmo was more front and center. Of course now everyone will talk about the new Justice nominee that hardly anyone can pronounce her name without phonetic coaching. I suspect Islamic terrorists are laughing their heads off among themselves when they hear what Leftists are calling unconscionable torture.

The Key to Reining In North Korea? It’s China, Stupid…



Judith Miller writes a rather succinct essay about North Korea’s quest to be a nuclear power. Miller’s conclusion is there is ONLY one nation on the globe capable of halting the insanity of a fully nuke armed North Korea. That nation is China.

JRH 5/26/09

Monday, May 25, 2009

Purist Islam is More than a Religion



Awesome anti-radical Islamic organizations like Move America Forward and sister organizations like American Congress for Truth and ACT! For America as well as many other organizations and people comprehend the truth about Islam.

This comprehension has led to a clarion call to rightly keep Gitmo open as an Islamic-terrorist prison open.

Mohammedans obviously wants Gitmo closed and Islamic terrorists freed.

Deluded Leftists want Gitmo closed due to well meaning altruism and the belief that all human beings regardless of inherent evil deserve equal rights of protection under the law. The equal rights thing is a lofty goal; however I believe all ideologies and religions that actively practice and/or incite their disciples into non-State acts of war or acts of terrorism against innocent civilians or governments protecting those citizens have made the decision to revoke civil rights.

Many of these anti-close Gitmo organizations and people are trying to alert American citizens that radical Islam has embraced America’s prisons. The meaning of which convicts in American prisons are turning to the radical Islam espoused by Saudi Wahhabists and Salafist Mohammedan terrorists. After these convicts are released from prison they take their acquired Theo-political ideology with them and either join terrorist cells or act alone against the American rule of law.

Steven Emerson is one individual that takes this hotbed of Islamic radicalism in American prisons to point out the foolishness of sending Gitmo inmates to those prisons. It is viewed that these Gitmo inmates will be viewed as soldiers of Allah available to strengthen radical Islam permeating American prisons.

The Theo-political Islam being taught and practiced in America must stop! Many would argue that the deification of the Quran and lesser Mohammedan revered books is part and parcel to today’s radical Islam. I know there are Mohammedans that believe they are above the barbarity propagated in the Quran and other writings and consider themselves good Muslims. However I tend to agree with the train of thought that good Mohammedans are those that follow the “fundamental” teachings of those texts. In essence those labeled as radical Islamists are in reality purist Mohammedans after the order of the prophet-dude that founded this Theo-political empire-building death cult.

American-Mohammedans that promote the purist form of Islam are thus advocating the overthrow of the American government and American Liberty that Leftists believe they are protecting.

Do not believe for a moment that the radical Islam (advocators of death and destruction) is a religion after the manner of most religions looking for inner peace in one form or another. The only inner peace offered by Mohammed’s religion is to totally submit to the will to the carnality inherent in Islam. One of the primary enticements to fight for Islam is to die a martyr and enjoy the raw sex offered in the Mohammedan Paradise. This enticement led to conquering Mohammedan hoards slaughtering non-Muslims in the quest to spread the Islamic cancer by violence and/or degrading humiliation.

This is the purist Islam. This is the Islam of Islamic terrorists. This is the Islam of Wahhabi, of Salafi and of Twelver Shi’ites.

JRH 5/25/09

Obama OK with Abortion

This is an awesome and terrible indictment on the abortion-genocide industry in America. The President of the United States is plugged into this genocidal murder 100%.

A Nuclear Armed N. Korea and Iran World


North Korea has successfully test detonated an underground weaponized nuclear device.

President Barack Hussein Obama has termed this North Korean act:

President Barack Obama called the moves "blatant defiance" of the Security Council and a violation of international law that would only further isolate North Korea.

North Korea's claims "are a matter of grave concern to all nations," he said, calling for international action in a statement from Washington. "North Korea's attempts to develop nuclear weapons, as well as its ballistic missile program, constitute a threat to international peace and security."
(Yahoo-AP)


So I have to wonder: What does President BHO intend to do about the nation that President GW called one of the axis of evil? As a memory refresher the axis of evil were originally Iraq, Iran and North Korea. The Iraq leg has been taken down perhaps to be replaced by a Syrian leg. Excerpts from Egypt’s Government Daily Al-Gumhouriyya show a moderate (so-called) view of Syria’s involvement with an axis of evil. The Arab view does not include non-Mohammedan North Korea but other possible Mohammedan nations supportive of Iran’s agenda. The key is that Syria is a leg of the axis of evil and that Iran is the puppet master.

So where is Iran getting a lot of its ballistic missile technology? That would be North Korea. If North Korea is building a ballistic nuclear missile system be assured that Iran is also.

President BHO’s condemnation of the North Korea test nuclear explosion implies that the United Nations will do something about the rogue nation. Will that happen?

It is unlikely! The United Nations is a toothless tiger that brings aid and comfort to autocracies (particularly Mohammedan autocracies) and condemns Western style democratic Republics for not towing the globalist dhimmitude of anti-Israel and anti-Americanism.

The only teeth the United Nations possesses is in the Security Council. In the Security Council the teeth are only shown when there is an unanimous agreement among the permanent members which include the autocracy of Red China and the transitional autocracy of Russia.

North Korea is a client state of Red China and of the formerly Leninist/Communist Russia. Presently the state of being a client is more toward the former than the latter.

Does President BHO really think that the Security Council will really do anything substantive to punish North Korea for breaking all sorts of treaties and international protocols? If President BHO believes that, he is a foreign policy moron.

The real global problem is that psycho North Korea actually is a nuclear deterrent for any nation let alone the toothless U.N. to do anything about North Korea’s global destabilization. North Korea has even warned that any direct action to stop its weapons grade nuclearization will be met with retribution that will first be aimed at South Korea.

So now North Korea is able to use nuclear extortion to bully its way to get nearly anything it wants knowing that a weak stomached fear of nuclear war and the mutually assured destruction (MAD) mentality will likely hamstring any real Western clout.

Since the psycho Communists of North Korea and the psycho Mohammedans of Iran are arms buddies, what kind of extortion will a nuclear armed WMD Iran use to encroach on hegemonic designs in the Middle East (including the destruction of Israel)?

JRH 5/25/09

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Obama's Two-State Fantasy



I am an avid foe of the so-called Two-State solution that would create a sovereign Palestinian State populated by Arabs who are no more Palestinians than Jewish Israelis who are Mohammedans. (SA Here and Here)

In an Orthodox Jewish and Christian perspective Mohammedans have no more right to land today designated by Israel outsiders as the West Bank and Gaza Strip than do Arabs have a right to India.

Thusly one can concretely understand my view that Palestine should never come into existence.

Mark Silverberg provides an analysis that adds further to my view about Israel and a group of Arabs that want to call themselves Palestinians.

JRH 5/24/09

A Middle East War Looming?


Here is some information from one of the top dogs in Conspiracy news – Prison Planet. The news article is entitled, “As Israel rages, US plans for Iran war re-emerge.”

Now I enjoy reading Conspiracy news however this kind of news is often derived from hear-say sources. Thus the reliability may be questionable because the truth is either stretched or if the news is on track with the source, confirmation is difficult to impossible to establish. News from coming Conspiracy news sources either look brilliant with the “I told you so” or the News appears laughable if it defies logic or tends to turn out just plain wrong.

This Prison Planet story has Prime Minister Netanyahu informing President Obama that Israel will go it alone to attack Iran if need be. The reality is such a desperate attempt at self-preservation would be at best a suicide mission if it succeeded.

The conclusion of Prison Planet is that if Israel goes it alone a Middle East war would emerge (that very well could expand into a World War); thus Obama chooses to prepare for war with the emerging enemies.

Neither Prison Planet nor I could divide decisively who those enemies would be except for the certainty of Iran. Because Hamas and Hezbollah line up with Iran such a war would divide the loyalties of the region. My guess is the Saudi leadership will have to decide to join the USA and Israel against Iran. Not because Saudi Arabia loves either nation but because Wahhabis hate Iranian Shi’ites. It is doubtful that the Wahhabi Saudis could stomach being on an equal to subservient plain with Iran.

Then there is Iraq. Such a war would surely line-up the Iraqi Sunni and Kurds against the Iraqi Shi’ites thus at the very least splitting the nation in two or at the worst into three hostile nations of a former Iraq.

Turkey would probably join the USA and Israel against Iran but not with gusto. There seems to be an unreasonable Turkish hatred toward the current largest national group without a sovereign nation – the Kurds.

Syria would join Iran out of existential need. Yet remember Syria is ruled by the minority Alawite-Shi’ites over the majority Syrian Sunnis. I suspect Lebanon would totally cease to exist as it is turn to pieces between American, Israeli and Turkish militaries on one side and Hezbollah, Syrian and rogue Iranian National Guard on the other end. Lebanon’s existence would be decided by the victors at the end of the regional conflict.

Then there are the wild card nations of Egypt and Jordan. Both of those nation’s citizens have a HUGE amount of sympathy for the Arabs who designate themselves as Palestinians. The first sympathies of the rulers of those two nations would be to counter the hated Iranian hegemonic plans for the Middle East; however Mohammedan riots no doubt urged by the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan) could mess up the governments of Egypt and Jordan neutralizing actual partnership with the USA to stay in power at their homes.

The current Afghan government would turn into a total puppet of the USA as the Taliban sympathetic populace will probably take up with the Islamic Terrorists stretching between both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Pakistan may disintegrate as a so-called secular Republic as the radical Islamic terrorists who have the hearts of both Afghanistan and Pakistan overrun Pakistan from one side as the current military looks over their back to see what action India will take expecting the worst.

Then comes the globalized part of any Middle East conflict. Russian and China by necessity will have to choose sides. At first glance those two nations may feel it is in their National Interest to go with Iran initially. On the other hand I can see a scenario that China and India join the USA against Iran out of (ironically) Capitalist market issues. Although China needs Middle Eastern oil, they are totally invested in American markets in which the USA owes the Red Chinese some dough.

China and Russia have put on a unified front militarily lately however I sense China would throw Russia under a bus in a heart beat if they thought the best chance to remain a powerful emerging wealth nation was to hook-up with America.

If China switched to support America in a Middle East war, Russia may bow out due to self-preservation. Or there is the uncertainty of the re-emergence of Russian hubris may cause the Russian government to go for broke by supporting Iran. It would not be the first time in Russian history that Russia appeared to be down for the count only to bounce back a victor. There is Russia versus Napoleon and Russia versus Hitler as examples.

I really don’t have a good guess about Russian in a Middle East conflict. As a Bible student I would guess Russia would join Iran and Syria merely because most Protestant Biblical prophetic based ministries expect Russia to come from the North to threaten Israel’s existence. If this turns out to be that prophetic time, when things look dire the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob will step in on Israel’s behalf at the last moment to render a decisive victory for Israel.

If it is not that prophetic moment, then look toward traditional geopolitical maneuvering to line up the sides as the cards are slowly drawn for play.

At any rate Prison Planet views President Obama to have contingency plans ready to battle Iran.

JRH 5/24/09

Saturday, May 23, 2009

The Jihadi Virus in Our Jails


President Obama gave a speech on National Security in which he said the existence of Gitmo has been used as a battle cry by Islamic terrorists (Of course BHO used a more PC expression). The finality of BHO’s speech is the premise he still intends to shut down Gitmo. His own political party is kind-of behind the agenda to set Islamic terrorists free from Gitmo. The Democrats in Congress seem to be behind BHO’s agenda only as much that Islamic terrorists will not be settled among their constituents.

Hmm … I wonder if that means incarcerated war criminals are dangerous.

With this in mind Michele Malkin points out that President Obama did not mention nary a word about the home grown Islamic terrorists developing right under America’s noses. Malkin uses an example a group of African-Americans that were converted to Mohammedanism in an American prison.

Did you get that? American prisons are Islamic da’wa universities to recruit disgruntled and probably violent inmates and turn them into Islamic terrorists prepared to do acts of atrocity on American soil in most cases on fellow Americans. Why? It is because Allah told them to in the Quran.

JRH 5/23/09

Friday, May 22, 2009

Obama Loses Senate Vote on Gitmo!



It is reported that fifty Gitmo Islamic terrorists are to be released soon; however thanks to a Democratic Party controlled Congress and the complaining of constituents no Islamic terrorists will be released in America. Anyway as of this post no terrorists will be housed in America.

The Leftist
Democrats have flipped about their bleeding heart agenda to close Gitmo if it means Islamic terrorists will be housed in America.

Here is a Move America Forward appeal for money to keep battling President Barack Hussein Obama’s intention of setting Islamic terrorists free from Gitmo. Perhaps MAF is taking a bit too much credit; nonetheless they are in the forefront on countering the slanted Left Mainstream Media BHO propaganda machine to shut Gitmo down.

JRH 5/22/09
******************************
Obama Loses Senate Vote on Gitmo! Republicans Hold Press Conference

Move America Forward
Email Sent: 5/21/2009 7:44 AM

BREAKING: OBAMA SHOT DOWN! House and Senate Dems DENY Funds to Shut Down Gitmo

Huge Victory for Republicans on GITMO Policy

BREAKING NEWS FROM BREITBART.COM

“Senate votes to block funds for Guantanamo closure”

“In a major rebuke to President Barack Obama, the Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to block the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States and denied the administration the millions it sought to close the prison.

The 90-6 Senate vote—paired with similar House action last week—was a clear sign to Obama that he faces a tough fight getting the Democratic-controlled Congress to agree with his plans to shut down the detention center and move the 240 detainees.”


Move America Forward is pleased to report that our relentless efforts to warn Congress and the American people about the dangers posed by closing Gitmo and bringing terrorists to America are PAYING OFF.

Earlier this month the House of Representatives stripped $80 Million from an Iraq/Afghanistan funding bill that Obama had requested for shutting down Guantanamo Bay.

House Democrats said ‘no’ to Obama and took the money out because even they realized President Obama has no plan for what to do with the terrorists if he shuts down Guantanamo Bay.

And now, today, the Senate just voted overwhelmingly to keep Guantanamo Bay open …FOR THE TIME BEING.

We have won an important battle, but the fight to keep terrorists OFF American soil continues!

Please
make a contribution so that we can continue our efforts to keep the terrorists IN GITMO!

Republican National Security Rock-Stars hold Press Conference in Response

After today’s vote, Republicans immediately held a press conference to declare a strategic victory because—until further notice – the terrorists will continue to be held safely off American shores at Guantanamo Bay’s state-of-the-art facility.

Senator James Inhofe of Oklahoma, who has worked with MAF many times before specifically on the Gitmo issue, led the press conference. Sen. Inhofe is a hero for American security interests as he is one of the most outspoken and courageous members of Congress when it comes to Guantanamo Bay. We applaud him for all his work and thank him for his support of Move America Forward.

“Though I am very pleased that Democrats in the Senate reversed course and voted today against including the $80 million in the war supplemental to close Gitmo, it is very likely that this funding could be included in future appropriations bills,” Senator Inhofe said. “I am encouraging all of my colleagues to sign onto my legislation to prevent any future funding for detainee transfers to the U.S.

Sen. Inhofe (R-OK)




Today’s press conference included several other Senators. All are vehement supporters of our troops and resolute in their commitment to keeping the terrorists sealed away at Gitmo. Senator Jim DeMint of South Carolina, who helped MAF coordinate our public backlash against the Berkeley City Council after they insulted our troops and the Marines stationed at the Berkeley recruiting center, was also part of the press conference.

Senators David Vitter and Sam Brownback, both who recently visited Gitmo, and Senators Mike Johanns, Bob Bennet, Pat Roberts and Kay Bailey Hutchison also participated in the press conference.
Click Here to watch a short clip from the press conference.

MAF is truly grateful to have the support of such esteemed leaders as Senator Inhofe, Senator Jim DeMint and House Minority Leader John Boehner. Because of our combined efforts, Gitmo will remain open, for at least a little longer, and terrorists will not be welcome on American soil.

We look forward to continuing our work and holding more public events to spread the truth about Guantanamo Bay – it’s the safest place to house the terrorists. Thanks to your support we are making some Democrats think twice about endorsing Obama’s far left agenda. Right now we have to keep the pressure on and continue the fight until we can pass a law that ABSOLUTELY BARS any possibility that terrorist detainees will ever be brought on American soil either for detainment or release!

DON’T LET OBAMA ALLOW GITMO TERRORISTS TO RUN LOOSE IN AMERICA

Make a contribution today to keep our efforts going strong!

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Gay Bucks Buy Northeastern State Legislators



Apparently sexual deviancy has the big bucks in the Northeast. Already three Northeastern States have passed into existence same-sex marriage laws. It should be noted though those laws were not decided by voters as much as they were enacted by State Legislators.

State Legislators have been receiving campaign donations from the sexual deviant crowd. This is coupled with the unfortunate reality of the lack of a presence of any well financed of Biblical Morality organizations. The organizations that are in place have depleted their financial coffers fighting other issues. The Roman Catholic Church is the biggest financially endowed Christian organization and that group has failed to step up to the plate to battle the immorality of same-sex marriage.

If you want to see the moral degradation of what Northeastern legislators are supporting you should view this link to the sexually prurient group that that does a morally degrading homosexual block party in New York. Be forewarned though, IT IS NOT A PRETTY SITE TO READ OR VIEW: http://www.folsomstreeteast.org/

The big bucks represented by these sick immoral hedonistic sexually explicit homosexuals are what New York State legislators are paying attention to. According to the New York Times (of all rags) New York’s duly elected State legislators are imminently preparing to enact a law legalizing same-sex marriage in the State of New York.

If you encounter a homosexual who vainly attempts to disabuse the Bible of Biblical Morality by informing you that God’s Word does not condemn homosexuality as immoral, then you can laugh at his tongue in cheek face.

Here are some examples from a Calvary Bible Church website from 2004:

After reading the Biblical texts that address homosexuality you might wonder how anyone could call themselves a Christian homosexual or why some mainline denominations now give approval to homosexual behavior. The Scriptures have not changed, so how, you might wonder, do they justify the sin of homosexuality in light of what the Scriptures say?

There are several approaches homosexuals use to explain why the Scriptures don’t mean what they say. First is to say that the reason Sodom and Gomorrah were judged is that the men of Sodom were not practicing hospitality. This is a desperate interpretation that disappears into vapor when one reads what Jude has to say about the reason God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. Jude, after explaining how God judged angels who did not keep their proper domain says in Jude 7, “just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these indulged in gross immorality and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.” Here Jude describes the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah as “indulging in gross immorality” and going after “strange flesh” or flesh of a different kind – the men of Sodom were homosexual and wanted to have homosexual relations with the angels.

A second way the Scriptures are twisted by homosexuals is by saying that the laws against homosexual activity in Lev. 18:22; 20:13 are only for the priests. It is argued that these texts appear in the holiness code for the priesthood (Lev. chs. 17–27) and therefore do not apply to those who are not priests.

The problem is that the holiness code also forbids other immoral acts such as incest, fornication, harlotry, adultery, and bestiality. You can quickly see the problem their argument creates. If homosexuality is acceptable because it is found in the holiness code that only applies to the priests then the other immoral acts mentioned only apply to the priests as well, which means incest, fornication, harlotry, adultery, and bestiality are acceptable, also.

A third way the Scriptures are twisted by those who argue that the Bible does not condemn homosexuality is by trying to argue that the Apostle Paul didn’t condemn all homosexual activity. He only condemned homosexual activity among those who were born to be heterosexual, for they would be contradicting their created nature. They argue that Paul assumed that some people would be born with a homosexual orientation and those people would be sinning if they had heterosexual relationships because they would be perverting the way God made them.

Of course the fallacy with this argument is that God doesn’t make anyone a homosexual. Homosexuality is not genetic, but a learned behavior, a sinful choice that people make. Granted, everyone is susceptible to some sins more than others, but a strong desire to commit a particular sin, doesn’t mean God made you to sin in that way. Some people like to lie, others like to steal, but this doesn’t mean God created them that way. It means they have a strong desire to sin in those areas but it does not exonerate their sinful behavior.

A fourth way the pro–homosexual advocates twist the Scriptures is by using the misogynist argument. The misogynist argument says that in biblical times women were treated cruelly and were oppressed. They say that men during that time felt it was important to show dominance over women in every area. They argue that the Apostle Paul was conforming to the cultural standard of the day so naturally he taught that heterosexual relationships were mandatory. Since we live in a different culture where women are not treated like cattle and oppressed, Paul’s teachings don’t apply.

The problem with this argument is that the Bible sets a very high standard for the respect and care of women and requires husbands to treat them as co–equals in salvation and equal in worth. There is no law, ancient or modern which honors women like the Bible. Husbands are commanded to love, cherish, nurture, honor, protect, provide for, love their wives as their own body, help their wives grow in the Lord and love their wives as Christ loved the church who gave himself up for her. Hardly a misogynist agenda, especially when you consider that the Apostle Paul, who was the most outspoken in condemning homosexuality, also was the most outspoken about how husbands are to love and honor their wives. Granted, men have sinned against God in every age by not loving and honoring their wives, but their wicked behavior towards their wives is not sanctioned in the Bible.

The reason homosexuals are so desperate to try and explain away the Bible’s universal condemnation of homosexual behavior is that men, in their selfish desire to satisfy their lusts, have always sought to justify their sin. God has placed within man an awareness that he exists, but men, wanting to sin with a clear conscience, either deny God, deny the Bible is the Word of God, or twist the Scriptures to conform to their own lusts. Yet, in doing this they open the door for every other sin.
(You should read the article from start to finish – it is informative.)


From a Biblical Morality view homosexuality is definitely a deviant perversion regardless of the faith abandoning sciences of the American Medical Association (SA THIS) and American Psychiatric Association (SA THIS).

The scientific community in its quest to validate a morally reprobate lifestyle such as homosexuality has been working feverishly to prove that homosexuality is biological-genetic as opposed to learned from the environment. The environment case would validate God’s Word and the genetic case would validate Secular humanism.

The irony of this scientific quest is that some homosexuals realized an emerging problem. That problem is that the discovery of a specific gay gene might prove to be a scientific way for normal parents to make sure that their child is genetically enhanced to wash away all inclinations toward homosexuality. Oops! The quest to genetically validate sexual deviancy might lead to genetically ending sexual deviancy.

Upon this realization the pro-homosexual scientists have attempted to connect genealogy to environment. This obscurant attempt to validate the homosexual gene stipulates that environment is the leading cause that activates that gene.

PLEASE! One doesn’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand that empirical data is being manipulated to appease the big buck homosexual organizations in their quest to invalidate Christianity as the foundation of the moral standards of America.

Thus it is not surprising that the American Psychology Association has publically acknowledged there is NO gay gene.

Still the well financed Homosexual agenda is succeeding in the Northeast in validating homosexuality via legalizing same-sex marriage. I wonder if there would be a greater outcry from normal heterosexuals if they and lawmakers were aware of the Homosexual agenda already implemented by many large businesses and corporations. Homosexual agenda influenced subservient businesses are actually persecuting Christians who take a stand not to participate in management mandated diversity seminars (i.e. code for forced homosexual acceptance).

Here are few examples:

Professor Janis Price of DePauw University, Indiana, placed issues of a magazine on a table in the back of her classroom. One of her students was offended by an article that was critical of how homosexuality was being handled in public schools and complained to the administration. Price was accused of providing her students with intolerant material. She was suspended and her salary cut by 25 percent.

Albert Buonanno, a Christian employee of AT&T Broadband, was fired in February 2004 for refusing to go along with a mandatory company policy demanding acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle.

Rolf Szabo lost his job at Eastman Kodak after he refused to go along with the company's "diversity" program, which required he give support to homosexuals in the work place who wanted to come out.

Motorola actively promotes a similar agenda through mandatory "homophobia" workshops and homosexual sex-ed courses. One employee told author David Limbaugh that "this push is causing a great deal of tension among employees and the 'quiet anger' of some who disapprove of the homosexual lifestyle because of their religious beliefs."

Episodes such as these are happening by the hundreds across America, every day of the week. According to medical, social science and especially legal experts, what is being called "diversity" is actually a dangerous new movement by a small group of activists to make the homosexual lifestyle appear as normal and healthy as the heterosexual lifestyle, even if that means deliberately hiding any information to the contrary.



Fitzgibbons recently served as an expert witnesses in a case involving an Ann Arbor Michigan high school student whose Christian viewpoint was deliberately excluded from the schools "Diversity Week" celebration. Part of the week's festivities involved a panel of six clerics from different denominations who were assembled for a discussion about "Homosexuality and Religion." No one on the panel represented the Judeo-Christian view of homosexual relations.

Betsy Hanson, an 18-year-old Roman Catholic student, requested that a representative of the Catholic Church be part of the panel. Her request was denied by school officials who claimed her religious views would convey a negative message and would "water-down" the positive religious message that they wanted to convey.

Hanson and her mother decided to sue and Detroit Federal Judge Gerald Rosen ruled in their favor. "Isn't this cultural hegemony, where you're only going to present one view to the exclusion of others?" the judge demanded of the school's attorneys. "Don't you think that smacks of government and religious totalitarianism? Isn't that how we got to book-burning in Nazi Germany back in the 1930s?"

Fitzgibbons believes schools and school psychologists should be held liable when they actively promote the homosexual lifestyle while withholding vital information about mental and physical risks.



Although doctors are obligated to provide informed consent to their patients, educators are not, he said.

However, in schools where a school psychologist is involved in these groups, then Fitzgibbons said they have the requirement to provide informed consent about the dangers of the lifestyle.

"If they don't, and a child experiences some of the medical illnesses that are so highly prevalent, particularly among men involved in same-sex relationships, that school psychologist is liable, the principal is liable and the school superintendent is liable. Just as when a doctor makes a mistake at a hospital, the hospital is also liable."

Phil Burress, president of Citizens for Community Values, has been sending out letters to 2,500 schools across the country who are relying on the "safe-school" programs devised by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network warning them of potential legal liabilities for the tort of negligence "if it is proven that homosexual activist organizations were granted access to students under the school's responsibility and that students suffered physical or mental harm. Under the right circumstances, state authorities could also bring criminal proceedings," he writes, citing Ohio Revised Code 2907.04, 2919.22 and 2919.24.
(Excerpted from intro of the Catholic Education Resource Center 6 Part essay entitled, "Homosexuality: The Untold Story — The phantom gene”)


Yeah, I am willing to bet this Roman Catholic study receives very little attention from the Mainstream Media. I also doubt that Northeastern (and now New York State) legislators have viewed this alternative yet mainstream view of homosexuality.

JRH 5/21/09 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake email)

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Gingrich: Pelosi Step Down as Speaker



Well I can see the reason that Newt Gingrich is a politician. His recent e-newsletter castigates Speaker Pelosi without actually calling her a liar. I was not so capable of being so diplomatic.

Speaker Pelosi is the classic example of the hypocrisy of the now devotedly Leftist Democratic Party. The Democrats went on a rampage of vilifying President Bush’s policies of keeping America safe even to the point of calling for a criminal investigation of the Bush Administration and those that acted patriotically to protect American citizens from the reoccurrence of another 9/11.

With the aid of the Mainstream Media, the Democrats unleashed some political venom of propaganda upon American voters to influence votes that placed the Democrats back in the driver’s seat in 2006. Then the voters received another chunk full of propaganda that elected a deceptive Leftist President whose primary goal is to transform America away from her roots of Christianity toward the diversity concept of Secular Humanism and the redistribution of wealth. The term “redistribution of wealth” is MSM code talk for Socialism at best and Communism at worst.

One can see Communism at its worst through the eyes of Comrade Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong.

The social transformation led by President Barack Hussein Obama and the elite cadres of the Democratic Party is subtly validating some of the worst elements of the morally depraved in America. The transformation excuse: The morally deprave are people on par with a race or religion; to discriminate against the morally depraved is thus racism and a denial of civil rights that all the diverse Americans should enjoy.

Okay, I know I digressed on Speaker Pelosi.

Newt neatly rails on Pelosi by putting her political agenda of persecuting the Bush Administration for the Democrats call torture. Is it not ironic the Obama Administration has gone to great lengths not to insult Mohammedans by eliminating such terms as the Global War on Terror (GWOT) or Islamic terrorism to find neutral words? Yet the Obama/Pelosi Democrats have no trouble using the word “torture” rather than Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT) against Americans that have devoted themselves to keep other Americans safe. Does anyone see the lunacy on this political vendetta to prevent Conservatives of the Republican Party from ever gaining control of Congress and the White House?

But check it out: Since Speaker Pelosi as the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence committee never protested EIT; does not that make Pelosi an adherent to the practice of protecting Americans?

So you see how Speaker Pelosi has dug a hole for herself by attempting to use plausible deniability to make it look like she was never on board with EIT.

Newt is correct that Pelosi should be removed not because of her political agenda, but because her political agenda has placed America and Americans at risk by diluting National Security.

JRH 5/20/09