Wednesday, May 27, 2009

The Lies of Muslim Revisionist History

Mohammedans have been trying to rewrite Israel’s history for years. The religion of peace wishes to extirpate the truth that the land had a Jewish Kingdom by heritage, which included a Jewish capital city called Jerusalem and the claim there was never a Temple built by Solomon and Zerubbabel (modified by Herod).

Ahmed Qurei:

"The world must be mobilized against all these Israeli attempts to change the symbols and signs of Jerusalem," he said. "There is nothing Jewish about the Al Aqsa Mosque. There was no so-called Jewish Temple. It's imaginary. Jerusalem is 100 percent Muslim."

David Hazony reporting on Dore Gold:

There has also been destruction at the level of ideas. As Mr. Gold shows, Muslim and Arab leaders in the past recognized that Jerusalem was the location of Solomon's Temple, but today it has become official policy, taught in schools and backed with pseudo research, that the most sacred place in the Jewish imagination — the Holy Temple in Jerusalem, built by King Solomon and maintained on and off for nearly 1,000 years — never existed. Echoing the Holocaust denial of their Iranian contemporaries, Palestinian leaders, writers, and scholars have embarked on a campaign of intellectual erasure, which Mr. Gold calls "Temple Denial," aimed at undermining the Jewish claim to any part of the land.

This revisionist history is becoming the talking point for the reason of the existence of another psycho-Arab State that would be called Palestine. Since Mohammedan revisionist academics are backed by tons of petro-dollars (especially Saudi Arabia), Leftist academics are willing to back this revisionist lunacy.

Real history shows that there was NEVER a sovereign nation or a land with a heritage called Palestine. There is especially NO record of a Mohammedan nation called Palestine. This land in the Levant dubbed Palestine is a region that has been the object of Conquest for a couple of millennia.

Jewish heritage traces their attachment to the land as a promise given by God to Abraham. Abraham never possessed the promise in his lifetime; however he taught it to his sons (Isaac – the child of promise – in particular). The promise was kept alive by Abraham’s descendants through the lineage of Isaac, Jacob (Israel) and Joseph through the Jewish deliverer Moses.

Moses had become a disgraced shepherd working for his Midianite father when Yahweh (God) spoke to Moses in a burning bush:

7 And the LORD said: “I have surely seen the oppression of My people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows. 8 So I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up from that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey, to the place of the Canaanites and the Hittites and the Amorites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites. 9 Now therefore, behold, the cry of the children of Israel has come to Me, and I have also seen the oppression with which the Egyptians oppress them. 10 Come now, therefore, and I will send you to Pharaoh that you may bring My people, the children of Israel, out of Egypt.”

Now some might query, “Why would God get rid of the inhabitants from their own land?” I would even hazard to guess that present day Arabs would say the displaced people residing in the former Canaanland were their Arab ancestors. Of course that is revisionist historical propaganda to portray the concept that Arabs were in the land they now call Palestine and were booted out by Israeli migrant conquerors.

Mohammedan academics are morons. To say in the same breath that there was never an Israeli kingdom and say that Israelis booted Arab ancestors from their land is an oxymoron. Either Israel was there or they were not.

Were the Canaanite inhabitants indeed Arabs? The answer is maybe. Certainly both Arabs and Jews (Hebrews) are Semitic peoples. But this would make the battles between Israeli-Hebrews and the Canaanite inhabitants an internecine war, not a war between Arabs and non-Arabs.

It is no more true that some Israeli-Hebrews displaced some Arab-Canaanites than Mohammed’s Arab’s displaced Jewish-Arab and Christian-Arabs from the Arabian Peninsula. Semites are Semites even if they are a different strain of Hebrew, Arab, Canaanite or whatever. It is more likely that the Canaanites were more separate from the Arabs linguistically than they were from the Hebrews.

It is insane for Arab/Mohammedan academics to thus claim the land was usurped from them by Israeli-Hebrews.

One other point about Israel possessing the Promised Land. Does anyone think that the Israelis were told to exterminate Canaanite people because did not like they smelled or looked? Or perhaps God was embarking on the evil of genocide to keep an Abrahamic Promise? Maybe God felt the Jews were so perfect in appearance and righteousness that he not only gave the Land of Promise to the Israeli-Hebrews but ordered mass genocide to satisfy the bloodlust of a conquering Semitic group over another Semitic group?

Come on Lefties and Jew-hating Mohammedans; give God Almighty a little bit more credit than that. Here is the reason that Israeli-Hebrews received the Land of Promise:

1 “Hear, O Israel: You are to cross over the Jordan today, and go in to dispossess nations greater and mightier than yourself, cities great and fortified up to heaven, 2 a people great and tall, the descendants of the Anakim, whom you know, and of whom you heard it said, ‘Who can stand before the descendants of Anak?’ 3 Therefore understand today that the LORD your God is He who goes over before you as a consuming fire. He will destroy them and bring them down before you; so you shall drive them out and destroy them quickly, as the LORD has said to you.
4 “Do not think in your heart, after the LORD your God has cast them out before you, saying, ‘Because of my righteousness the LORD has brought me in to possess this land’; but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD is driving them out from before you. 5 It is not because of your righteousness or the uprightness of your heart that you go in to possess their land, but because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God drives them out from before you, and that He may fulfill the word which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. 6 Therefore understand that the LORD your God is not giving you this good land to possess because of your righteousness, for you are a stiff-necked people.
(Deut. 9: 1-6)

The Canaanite nations had sunk into a depraved cultural stench that included such acts as temple prostitution and child sacrifice. Are these the people the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians claim as ancestors?

Maybe there is a connection between the Arabs and the Canaanites. Mohammedan Arabs use human shields of men, women and children to fight their Islamic terrorism. Mohammedan Arabs kill themselves and men, women and children in homicidal-suicide bombs to die a martyr to enter paradise to enjoy insatiable sex with 72 voluptuous virgins.

Could it be that the Diaspora of Jews have been coming back to their Promised Land not because of their inherent righteousness and God’s favor, but because the majority of the surrounding people practice a supremacist-racist death-cult that God views as a cup too full of cultural sin?

Part of the Mohammedan quest to eliminate evidence of a Jewish presence is the very thing they accuse Israel of doing; viz. the destruction of artifacts and antiquities that prove the heritage of Judaism. Mohammedans have systematically destroyed Jewish and Christian antiquities and holy sites since modern Israel came into existence.

The existence of a national group of people called “Palestinians” is a propaganda myth (HERE and HERE) that serves only one purpose; i.e. an excuse to perpetually find a way to destroy Israel and as many Jews as can be had.

The attack on Jerusalem’s Jewish heritage is still ongoing through the lying propaganda of revisionist history.

JRH 5/27/09

No comments: