Wednesday, October 31, 2007

The Heinous Support of Islamism by the Western Left

One of my friends at the Vox Community discovered one of the most libelous videos on David Horowitz and Conservatives who are educating America on the difference between Islamist Theo-political ideology and Mohammedanism.

I personally confess to being an Islamophobe because Mohammedan holy writings are the ammunition Islamists use to promote their dream of an intolerant international Caliphate in which the globe must submit. I know there are Mohammedans out there that condemn Islamism; however there are not nearly enough and most are quiet about the dastardly deeds of homicidal deaths inflicted on people who would otherwise could less of an Islamist existence.

video by acg103 (can also be viewed at Humbled Infidel) is a load of crap skewed horribly by disinformation to use snippets to support an untrue of hatred. In affect acg103 is spreading the accusation of hatred of Christianity and Conservatives who stand for morality and against Islamist theo-ideology.

If acg103 was caught by an Islamist, the terrorist would whack his head off for being an atheist. Acg103 may protest: “But I supported your right to practice your religion,” as the Islamist sword was drawn (as so
many times in the past) to execute decapitation.

The Islamist might reply: “You are an infidel and worse, you do not believe in Allah.” As the blade begins its descent acg103 would these last words:
Allahu Akbar (Allah-god is the greatest).

Acg103 has the audacity to call those who expose Islamism racists and hate mongers. In fact if you visit
acg103’s YouTube site it is enmeshed in pink. Friends pink and red are colors of Marxists. Acg103 sounds like the kind of Marxist that used to dominate the old “Evil Empire” – The Soviet Union. The old Soviets were masters of using lies to try to propagandize their citizens and the foolish outside the Evil Empire’s sphere of influence.

O what a day it was when people like Ronald Reagan (representing the true America) and Pope John Paul II (symbolizing Christianity) brought the Evil Empire to its knees in a glorious collapse.

Acg103, the same exposition will happen to your pack of Left Wing lies!

Spanish PM Zapatero: Justice Rendered

Twenty-one out of twenty-eight terrorists were convicted for the Madrid train bombings. The bombings were arguably the most horrific next to America’s Islamofascist attack by al Qaeda on 9/11.

The mystery of the seven acquittals is that the alleged master mind behind the Spanish homicides was acquitted of all charges. Thus Spanish prosecutors are either morons or a murderous master mind is still at large.

Amazingly the Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero who came to power because Spanish voter dhimmitude is quoted as saying: “Justice was rendered today.”

How can justice have been rendered if the master mind was either let go or not found that claimed the lives of 191 Spanish citizens in 2004? I wonder how Spanish citizens feel that a perpetrator of massive Spanish murders is alive and well some where on planet earth feeling smug and victorious that a democratic system of justice either failed to convict or locate a master mind of Spanish deaths?

Is justice served? Justice is never served (or “rendered”) as long as conscienceless devils use terror as a format to influence democracies to the will of Islamofascism.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Campus Leftists Admire Islamofascism over American Bill of Rights

I just read an interesting article by Dennis Prager who was part of David Horowitz’s Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week.

Horowitz assembled a group of experts from the Conservative side of spectrum to speak at seminars on college campuses across the nation educating listeners about Islamism. Apparently the title “Islamo-Fascism” was employed to equate today’s Islamism with the cultic use of ideological fascism of the past to impose State rule as the center of a citizen’s life and actions. Thus the implication that Islamism is more an ideology utilizing religious principles of Islam to be the center of a Mohammedan’s life and actions according to the radical interpretations the Sunni Wahhabi school of thought or the more extremist versions of Shia school’s of thought (e.g.
the Twelvers).

Prager points out that this tour of University revealed that students that follow Leftist thinking are molded by Leftist Professors. Apparently the more Leftist the Professor the more Leftist is a student’s ideological mind-slate.

Thus Prager discovered that Leftists will listen and promote speakers of an Islamist orientation in the name of their version of Free Speech; however when a Conservative comes to campus to refute Islamism, Free Speech is drowned out by heckling and Leftist slurs. Prager noted the times that Left oriented student bodies sat and offered the respect of Free Speech by listening, it was due to the University utilizing authority figures such as guards or campus police that provided the threat of the boot for disrespect. The Universities that allowed chaos over order had unruly students that shouted the speakers down preventing the seminar to come to a conclusion.

The conclusion I drew from Prager’s article is that way too many American Universities are pumping the hatred of America into the minds of American students so that they loath America’s troops and admire America’s enemies.

This is moronic! American minds are being taught Leftist ideology which is for the most revisionist history that leads to self-loathing of America’s greatness: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Then simultaneously validating everything Islamofascism represents: intolerance, no Liberty, no Freedom and only submission to the service of Islamist Theo-political ideology.

Monday, October 29, 2007

Fukuyama has become Delusional

"Many of the voices that called for, and then bungled, military intervention in Iraq are now calling for war with Iran. Why should the rest of the world think that conflict with a larger and more resolute enemy would be handled any more capably?"

This is the
opening line to Neocon traitor Fukuyama. He whines about failed policy with vigor when at one time Fukuyama was a proponent of the very policy that was implemented.

The only thing that was wrong in the Iraqi invasion was not nailing down a legitimate reason to take down a Middle East de-stabilizer in genocidal Saddam Hussein and not nailing down serious military rules of engagement. The rules of engagement were based on political fallout and the stupidity of living up to being politically correct. The fight was not taken to insurgents with the same vigor as the politicians should have allowed the military to execute.

The Bush Administration worried too much how the MSM would fire words of hatred through the written and televised word.

For example: the MSM correctly exposed Abu Ghraib as an atrocity, the Left Wing news hounds used words of razors as an example of why it was wrong to be in Iraq. Abu Ghraib was wrong but associating that incident with taking down Saddam is ludicrous. Saddam was a butcher and his sons were butcher/rapist heir apparent.

Another example is the "Haditha Massacre." We really can't call it a massacre any longer, it has been proven that the so-called "Haditha Massacre" was staged by insurgents and fed to lying journalists who believed the lies of the Islamofascists rather than good American boys fighting for the Liberty of Iraq. Haditha should be labeled the Incident in which the MSM promoted the propaganda of the enemy at home and abroad.

If there is a self-defeating American hegemony, it is because the rest of the world would rather believe the lies of Islamists thinking peace will result rather than joining America in unity and take down these barbarous murderers at all costs. There should be an Allied WWII mindset: a full and complete surrender of the enemy rather it is a rogue nation or a multitude of transnational terrorists.

Insight into a Giuliani Presidency

I am still with Fred; however I just found out Giuliani has foreign policy advisors that I consider awesome (and the Slanted Left considers scary).

Those two are
Norman Podhoretz and Daniel Pipes. Podhertz is considered to be a founder (not THE founder) of Neoconservativism and Daniel Pipes is a preeminent anti-Islamist advocate.

My Conservativism leans toward the currently much criticized Neocons. So you can understand why I think it is excellent Giuliani is utilizing Podhoretz and Pipes as part of his advisory team. What ever deficiencies Giuliani has in social Conservativism, the presence of his advisors point to a man that would want to win the War on Terror instead of retreat, lose and give Islamists a toe-hold of political correctness and adverse influence in the West.

In light of that I am going to be re-posting “
’We Must Bomb Iran’ Says Podhoretz” and the article it is based on: “We Must Bomb Iran, says US Republican guru.”

The point of the two articles is deterring a nuclear armed Iran; however as you read them (the first will like an intro) realize that Giuliani surrounds himself with advisors (not sycophants) to mold an outlook of a Presidential Administration.


"We Must Bomb Iran," Says Podhoretz

Mark Alexander
Saturday, October 27, 2007
A New Dark Age Is Dawning

A senior foreign policy adviser to the Republican frontrunner Rudy Giuliani has urged that Iran be bombed using cruise missiles and "bunker busters" to set back Teheran’s nuclear programme by at least five years.The tough message at a time of crisis between the United States and Iraq was delivered by Norman Podhoretz, one of the founders of neoconservatism, who has also imparted his stark advice personally to a receptive President George W. Bush. "None of the alternatives to military action - negotiations, sanctions, provoking an internal insurrection - can possibly work," said Mr Podhoretz.
We must bomb Iran, says US Republican guru (more) By Toby Harnden

We must bomb Iran, says US Republican guru

By Toby Harnden in New York
Last Updated: 1:04am GMT 29/10/2007

A senior foreign policy adviser to the Republican frontrunner Rudy Giuliani has urged that Iran be bombed using cruise missiles and "bunker busters" to set back Teheran’s nuclear programme by at least five years.

The tough message at a time of crisis between the United States and Iraq was delivered by Norman Podhoretz, one of the founders of neoconservatism, who has also imparted his stark advice personally to a receptive President George W. Bush.

"None of the alternatives to military action - negotiations, sanctions, provoking an internal insurrection - can possibly work," said Mr Podhoretz."They’re all ways of evading the terrible choice we have to make which is to either let them get the bomb or to bomb them."In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Mr Podhoretz said he was certain that bombing raids could be successful.

"People I’ve talked to have no doubt we could set it back five or 10 years. There are those who believe we can get the underground facilities as well with these highly sophisticated bunker-busting munitions."
Although Mr Podhoretz said he did not speak for Mr Giuliani, the former New York mayor whom he briefs daily appears to have embraced at least the logic of his hard-line views.

During a visit to London last month, Mr Giuliani said Iran should be given "an absolute assurance that, if they get to the point that they are going to become a nuclear power, we will prevent them or we will set them back five or 10 years".

Mr Podhoretz said: "I was very pleased to see him say that. I was even surprised he went that far. I’m sure some of his political people were telling him to go slow ... I wouldn’t advise any candidate to come out and say we have to bomb - it’s not a prudent thing to say at this stage of the campaign."

But Mr Podhoretz’s 77 years and his position as a pre-eminent conservative foreign policy intellectual means he can not only think the unthinkable but say the unsayable.

"My role has simply been to say what I think," he said, explaining that he takes part in weekly conference calls and is in daily email contact with the Giuliani campaign.

He is the most eminent of a clutch of uncompromisingly hawkish aides assembled by Mr Giuliani. They include Daniel Pipes, who opposes a Palestinian state and believes America should "inspire fear, not affection", and Michael Rubin, a former Pentagon official who has argued that Condoleezza Rice’s diplomacy is "dangerous" and signals American "weakness" to Teheran.

"Does Rudy agree with me?" Mr Podhoretz asked rhetorically. "I don’t know and I don’t wish to know." But he added that "Rudy’s view of the war is very similar to mine."

Mr Podhoretz’s thesis is that the war on terror is in fact World War Four and that the 42-year-long Cold War should be more properly described as World War Three.

Awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, America’s highest honour, by President George W. Bush in 2004, Mr Podhoretz later sought a rare one-on-on audience with the US commander-in-chief. They met in New York’s Waldorf Astoria hotel in the spring.

The author of the recent World War IV: the Long Struggle Against Islamofacsism spent about 35 minutes outlining his case for air strikes against Iran as Mr Bush’s then chief adviser Karl Rove took notes.

"Whether I had any effect on him I truly don’t know but I sure tried my best to persuade him," he said.

"He was very cordial. He was warm. He listened. He occasionally asked a question as I made the case but he was truly poker faced."

Mr Podhoretz left the meeting unshaken in his belief that Mr Bush would attack Iran before he leaves office.

"The spirit of the questions was not to try to refute or contradict what I was saying. I didn’t get any negative vibes."

He said that now "the debate [over Iran] is secretly over and the people who are against military action are now preparing to make the case that we can live with an Iranian bomb".

Neither Mr Bush nor Mr Giuliani, however, would countenance Teheran acquiring a nuclear weapon and either one would authorise military action once they were convinced Iran had passed the point of no return with its uranium enrichment programme.

"Unlike a ground invasion where you’ve got to mass hundreds of thousands of troops, it takes six months and everybody knows you’re mobilising, with air strikes, we’ve got three carriers in the region and a lot of submarines," Mr Podhoretz said.

"I would say it would take five minutes. You’d wake up one morning and the strikes would have been ordered and carried out during the night. All the president has to do is say go."


Insight into a Giuliani Presidency
John R. Houk
© October 29, 2007

A New Dark Age Is Dawning front page:

Mark Alexander, an honours graduate in economics (and political science), is not affiliated or associated with any political party. He is the INDEPENDENT voice of REASON.

We must bomb Iran, says US Republican guru
© Copyright of Telegraph Media Group Limited 2007.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

Ignorant Christians Criticize Rep. Duncan of Oklahoma

I stand behind Rep. Rex Duncan and his fellow Congressional members for refusing Quran’s as gifts.

I can hardly believe
moronic people who call themselves Christians are calling Duncan and Company religious bigots. They are American patriots standing for what America was founded on: Christian morality.

The Tulsa World has one minister standing in front of photo Mecca criticizing Duncan. What makes Rev. Marlin Lavanhar a moron is that if he would venture to Mecca and defend Mohammedanism and simultaneously announce he is a Christian Reverend, the Mohammedans would lop off his head.

It is like
Duncan says:

"Most Oklahomans do not endorse the idea of killing innocent women and children in the name of ideology."

The Quran and the Hadith include the killing of any non-Mohammedan that announces a different religious predilection.

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Congress Passes Moratorium on Taxing Internet

All hail common sense of the Slanted Left and the Slanted Right: The Democratic Party controlled Senate passed a seven year moratorium on taxing the Internet. This goes along with a recent Democratic Party controlled House passing a four year extension on taxing the Internet. All that is left is for the House and Senate to get together and wrangle out an agreement on non-tax extension period.

In my opinion it is good news and bad news: the good news is a tax moratorium on Internet usage for a period of time; the bad news is the moratorium should have permanent.

Here is the
ccpga Yahoo Group I first read of the good news:

JRH 10/27/07

    VICTORY! Senate Extends Internet Tax Moratorium for Seven Years

    Fri Oct 26, 2007 11:25 pm
    ccpga Yahoo Group

    On Thursday night, the U.S. Senate passed a seven-year extension of the moratorium that prevents states and localities from imposing new taxes on Internet access and on the goods and services consumers purchase online.
    The Senate's action to extend the current Internet tax moratorium, which is set to expire on November 1, came approximately one week after the U.S. House approved a bill calling for a four-year extension of the tax ban. Both chambers of Congress will now have to negotiate a compromise on the length of time for the extension before the legislation can be sent to President Bush for his signature.
    CFIF activists sent more than 25,000 letters, e-mails and faxes to their Members of Congress on this issue during the last two weeks. Your willingness to make your voices heard was instrumental in ensuring this important victory for consumers.
    Thanks for your hard work!


Here is a more detailed from Info World:

    Senate passes seven-year Internet tax moratorium
    Senate's Internet tax legislation makes changes to the House bill that are intended to protect e-mail messages and instant messaging from usage taxes

    By Grant Gross,
    IDG News Service
    October 26, 2007

    The U.S. Senate has passed legislation that would extend a moratorium on Internet access taxes for seven years, giving supporters hope that an extension will be signed into law before the current moratorium expires Nov. 1.

    The Senate late Thursday passed the seven-year extension on a voice vote. The moratorium would extend the ban on Internet-only taxes, such as access and "bit" taxes on information as it travels through a taxing jurisdiction. The Senate passed an amended version of a House of Representatives bill, the awkwardly named Internet Tax Freedom Act Amendments Act.

    The House passed a four-year Internet tax moratorium earlier this month. The two chambers will have to reconcile the two versions of the moratorium before sending the legislation to U.S. President George Bush to be signed.

    The Senate's seven-year extension represented a compromise between a group of senators, many of whom opposed an extension in the past, who wanted a four-year ban, and a second group that wanted a permanent ban.

    Senators calling for a four-year ban, including Thomas Carper, a Delaware Democrat, and Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, argued that a permanent extension would hurt state and local governments' long-term ability to raise money. Other critics of the ban have raised concerns that a permanent ban would give telecom providers the opportunity to press for tax-exempt status on services such as VOIP (voice over Internet Protocol).

    "This agreement is a common sense victory both for Internet users and for state and local governments," Carper and Alexander said in a joint statement. "It continues the moratorium on Internet taxation, avoids unfunded federal mandates on states and cities ... and allows Congress to revisit the issue after seven years."

    Supporters of a long-term ban say it encourages broadband adoption, and, by extension, helps drive the U.S. economy.

    Senator John Sununu, a New Hampshire Republican who pushed for a permanent moratorium, also praised the Senate's action. The amendment crafted by Sununu and Carper, in addition to extending the ban, made some changes to the House bill that were intended to protect e-mail messages and instant messaging from usage taxes, Sununu said.

    Some critics, including Senator Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat, had raised concerns that a Senate moratorium bill would open up e-mail and instant messaging to taxes.

    "This bill -- a drastic improvement over what came out of the House -- makes a clear statement that taxes on Internet access are wrong for consumers and wrong for the economy," Sununu said in a statement. "The Senate has made real progress in the name of Internet tax freedom, passing improved legislation that offers more certainty for this national and global communication network."

    Wyden, a long-time tax moratorium supporter, also applauded the Senate vote.
    The changes approved by the Senate will protect instant messaging and e-mail, including voice and video messaging services, Wyden said in a statement.

    "These services have sparked revolutions in our ability to communicate, bringing distant grandparents closer to their grandchildren and giving our soldiers in the field a more direct link to home," he added.


Senate passes seven-year Internet tax moratorium

Copyright © 2007. All Rights reserved. InfoWorld is a leading publisher of technology information and product reviews on topics including viruses, phishing, worms, firewalls, security, servers, storage, networking, wireless, databases, and web services.

Friday, October 26, 2007

Iran Nukes and the Israel/Palestine Conflict

Aaron Klein reports that a Palestinian Intelligence terrorist official is claiming that an America will attack Iran in two to three months if the latest round of sanctions is ignored by Iran.

When the Palestinian-Arab was asked on what he based his claim, he evaded the answer. The terrorist just said he “understood” from talks relating to Palestinian Statehood that America intends to pay for Arab support against Iran, including creating a Palestinian State, to launch an attack on Iranian nuke facilities.

The story could be a geopolitical brinksmanship plant in which everyone knows that World Net Daily would report. The purpose of the plant is to extend more back door notification that the Bush Administration is serious of its intentions.

In speculation there is always an “on the other hand.” The scenario makes sense.

The Arab dictatorships and Arab Monarchies (e.g. Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia) not connected to the puppet strings of Iran (e.g. as Syria, Hezbollah and radical Shi’ites of Iraq) are feeling the heat of Islamist Theo-political fundamentalism (whether it is Wahhabi or radical Shi’ite). Greed of power and wealth of Arab ruling and wealthy elites does not line up with the tenets of Islamist Theo-political ideology. For many of these Arab elites (not all for some do buy into Islamism) a unified Mohammedan Islamist Caliphate-like scenario would dip into a lifestyle that runs counter to Islamism.

Then there is the Palestine issue itself. The establishment of a sovereign Palestine (God forbid) would relieve a lot of public pressure upon Arab elites to constantly have an anti-Israel policy. Certainly in public the Mohammedan minions would not accept a pro-Israel stance because of the
Dar al-Islam ideology that is ingrained in the Mohammedan mind; however among the ruling Arab elites a secretive benign policy toward Israel would go a long way in perpetuating the economic status quo and empower the ruling Arab elites to keep ruling. These Arab elites may look medieval however petro-wealth has embraced them into the 21st century global economy.

If a Palestine State exists, the Arab elites can focus more resources on shoring up their power locally.

Again, “on the other hand,” the construct of a current sovereign Palestine would be a polarity of radical religious Islamists (like Hamas) versus radical Islamofascist terrorists that use religion to gain the traditional Arabic power structure (like Fatah). In either case, a sovereign Palestine would be ruled by Terrorists whose goal is still to destroy Israel.

If an Iran, Syria Hezbollah troika attacks Israel before the US implements an attack on Iranian nuke facilities; certainly the new Palestine would join the Mohammedan troika.

The other Arab elites who had promised allegiance to America to support an American attack on Iran would be forced to reevaluate their National Interests. I suspect if there was a hint of success against the Israel’s IDF; some Arab elites would join the troika at least with lip service to satisfy the blood lust of their Mohammedan citizens.

It would be a tough call for the Arab elites for if Israel held off an Islamist attack long enough, America would be forced to use their military resources to strike back – even if Russia and China nodded support toward the Iranian coalition.

This speculation may deviate into an uncountable amount of scenarios based on who supports whom; however one thing would be certain – it would be another World War for the globe.

The essence of escalation or backing down will be all about timing and global reactions.


Thursday, October 25, 2007

Homosexuals, A Threat To A Nation, Culture - Themselves

Michael Savage speaks the truth about immorality and homosexuality: it is undermining our society. Savage does this without a hint of profanity but with stern words.

And just to show that Savage is not a secular conservative, he quotes Pope Benedict XVI to back up his words with a Christian Roman Catholic perspective.

America Unilaterally Increases Stiff Sanctions on Rogue Iran

Secretary of State Condi Rice and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson made joint statements announcing sanctions on Iran and explaining the reasoning for the sanctions.

The sanctions in a nutshell are tagged into Iran’s insistence of creating weapons grade uranium which is a quality way beyond needed for peaceful nuclear energy.

A few subdivision reasonings surrounded Iran’s constant threatening of Israel and America for interfering with the Iranian nuke program, the Revolutionary Guard and the Quds Force actively supplying arms and training to terrorists from the Taliban, Shi’ites in Iraq, Hamas of pseudo-Palestinians and Hezbollah.

It is now illegal for business to be conducted with Iran wherever there is American jurisdiction and whatever Iranian assets under Iranian jurisdiction will be frozen.

The official government stand is that this is not a prelude to war with Iran; however Presidential statements, Vice Presidential statements and now State/Treasury statements are a chain of aggressive wording that has all the appearances of daring Iran to cross the line in the sand (if they already have not done so).

I can’t wait to hear the official Iranian response to today’s turning of the screws of pressure on Iran to comply with American led International wishes.

Dennis Miller on Sen. Harry Reid

This is an awesome verbal face slapping of Moonbat defeatist Senator Harry Reid by Dennis Miller!

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Oklahoman State Congressmen Return Gift Qurans

I grew up in the great Evergreen State of Washington. I still consider it home even though the Western majority of the State are a bunch of Moonbat Liberals. I am from Central Washington considered the Eastern side of Washington. The Cascade Mountain Range divides the State.

I know, you are thinking, “Who cares?”

I have resided off and on in the State of Oklahoma since my thirties. Typically I do not like Oklahoma: It is hot and humid, it has tornadoes, local government oft times gravitates to corruption, New York is the only State that has more toll roads than Oklahoma (and this is a rural State) and could go on if I thought hard enough.

The cool good thing about Oklahoma is that my wife is from here, there are awesome Bible believing Churches and Oklahoma has a decent Conservative streak.

Due to my lack of connectivity to Oklahoma I tend not to pay attention to the local news much. I wish I would have recently.

I found out from the
Debbie Schlussel blog that a GOP State Representative was the leader in returning Qurans that were distributed as gifts by a State panel on diversity. (I suspect the State’s Democratic Gubernatorial Administration had something to do with that – I didn’t vote for him.)

Rex Duncan is a Republican State Representative from Sand Springs, OK. Sand Springs is close to where I live. Duncan is the leader of a group of State Reps that sent the Qurans back.

Their reason for sending them back:

    In a letter to colleagues, state Representative Rex Duncan says "most Oklahomans do not endorse the idea of killing innocent women and children in the name of ideology." At least 17 other legislators have notified the Governor's Ethnic American Advisory Council that they too will return the gift.

Now this is a moment that made proud to live in Oklahoma!

Of course there were some Moonbats that denounced the Politically Incorrect Legislators saying the Politically Correct view that Mohammedanism is a religion and not an ideology.

Now I am certain there are the so-called moderate Mohammedans that are seekers of Allah more than the worldly precepts in the Mohammedan Quranic ideology which indeed teaches the things that Duncan and cohorts object to.

Kudos are deserved to the Conservatives in Oklahoma’s State Congress.

Profile Hillary's Foreign Donors? You Betcha!

Evidently Hillary has been receiving donations from illegal aliens of the China-Town kind. She has sent back the high profile (i.e. big) donations if there a connection can be made to Asian barely speaking English political donors.

Apparently the media has been exposing the potential illegal donations to Hillary’s campaign. Hence Asian minority rights groups are beginning to clamor that to much attention has been focused by the media on minority Asian donors.

It is incredible! The racial card is being played to get scrutiny off of Hillary’s dubious campaign fund raising.

Turkey Hunts Down PKK Kurds in Kurdish Iraq

Turkey is on the offensive against Communist Kurds which are hiding in the Kurd autonomous region of Iraq. Turkey has longed warned the Iraqi government and the American government that if the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) is not actively prevented from terrorist excursions into Turkey a military response would be imminent.

I am no lover of Turkey. Turkish history has been that as the last of the Mohammedan Empires (Ottoman Empire prior to the end of WWI) to viciously attack Christianity and Europe.

In the Middle Ages the old Ottomans would take the children of conquered Christians (mostly in the Balkans) and forcibly convert them into Mohammedans and train them to be a lethal medieval Special Forces to fight and conquer more Christian lands. These were the
Janissaries of old. As the 19th century was ending the Janissaries became a corrupt ineffective group for the Ottomans; however for hundreds of years prior to that these former Christian children forced to train as an elite military force were feared for their brutality.

Around 1830 the
Greeks began to throw off the brutality of the Ottoman Turks gaining Independence. By the end of WWI Greece nearly fulfilled their dream of reclaiming Greek land in Anatolia (Much of Turkey today) by driving to Ankara. Unfortunately Ataturk who had ended the Sultanate of the Ottoman Empire of after losing WWI stiffened to the Greek offensive. Turkish nationalism drove the Greek army out of Anatolia force Greeks who had live there for thousands of years to flee to the borders of present day Greece. Ataturk’s revenge meant the slaughter of Christian Greeks as they tried to flee, particularly in Greek Smyrna (now Turkish Izmir).

In recent history the
Ottomans and modern Turkey have executed Kurds who have rebelled due to Turkish oppression. Toward the end of WWI the Ottoman Turks forced Armenian Christians in a long march to separate them from Turkish society, this turned out to be genocide for nearly two million Christian Armenians.

As you can see I am no fan of Turkey. The only reason the Turkish nation is consider a Western and American ally is because of their strategic location betwixt Europe, Russia and the Mohammedan Middle East.

The tragedy of political reality makes Turkey a central cog to American National Interests as well as to Europe’s Interests. Although Turkey is officially a secular nation with a Mohammedan foundation and a modicum of democracy, Turkish National Interests and National Pride make them NOT nice people.

On the other hand the PKK Kurds are not nice people either. It is a Communist group of Kurds that use terrorism to inflict on Turkish civilians to achieve a goal of a sovereign State of Kurdistan. I am not a fan of Turkey but I loathe the ideology and tactical strategies of Terrorists. Terrorism is evil no matter who utilizes it homicidal practices to justify a wishful end.

The Kurdish people are currently the largest ethnic group in the world that does not have a nation. I have not ever looked into it but the Kurds are loathed by Middle Easterners: Turks, Arabs and Iranians. Each of these groups of fellow Mohammedans has had a hand in oppressing Mohammedan Kurds over the centuries.

As an American I tend to root for the underdog and that is exactly what the life of a Kurd has been. Again though, American National Interests should be cued to put down Communist Kurds and reinforcing a democratic society of Iraqi Kurds. In doing so, it may disperse a growing lack of trust between Turkey and America politically.

Some day Turkey will screw up. When that day happens I pray their geopolitical advantage is lost and perhaps Greece recapture their ancient lands.

Border Security and Immigration Reform Plan

My man Fred has come up with a Border Security and Immigration Reform Plan.

The plan if it could be implemented, appears to concur totally to the standard Conservative’s vision of immigration and how to deal with illegal immigrants.

The only point I found ambiguous is Fred’s point on improving the legal immigration process. Fred seems to hint legalizing the illegal; however even here I like most of what I read.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Justice Interrupted: Clarity denied in Holy Land Foundation mistrial

I received an e-newsletter from the American Congress for Truth (ACT) today. The ACT editor is posting an opinion article from The Dallas Morning News about the Holy Land Foundation mistrial.

Only in America can Islamofascists tied to terrorists receive a mistrial.

It begs the question (or questions): Did the Prosecution screw up? Did the Judge utilize incompetent instructions? Was a Jury allowed to be selected that was too moronic to comprehend the wicked web of evidence? While the Defendants are free, will
the flow of Sharia banking continue unabated to fund homicidal barbaric terrorists?

Thank God the Prosecution is going to retry Mohammedan criminals who were NOT exonerated.

I am going to post at the ACT e-newsletter version of The Dallas Morning News.


Not too long ago Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez castigated the Left and the Right about how the War in Iraq is being prosecuted. When I say Left and Right Sanchez’s criticism left no stone unturned. He verbally whooped up on the Bush Administration, a Democratic Congress, and the Mainstream Media and probably others I did not catch.

Sanchez was the top commander and now he is retired. When he was in charge he reported the rules of engagement made Iraq a nightmare.

That was then, now is the “Surge” under the guidance of General David Patraeus. Patraeus’ prosecution of the War in Iraq has become a nightmare for al Qaeda and foreign insurgents.

Here is
Pete Hegseth’s assessment of the “Surge.”

GOP Halloween Fun - Scariest Democrat

Here is some Halloween fun courtesy of the GOP: Who is the scariest Democrat?

My vote was Hillary. To make your vote count, go the GOP’s

US/India Partnership in Trouble

It would have been awesome to have India (the largest Western style democracy globally) in America’s camp. America even went out on a limb to strike a nuclear technology deal with India subject to approval of Congress and India’s Parliament.

There were critics on the Left in America of sharing nuclear technology with India in light of our denunciation of North Korea and Iran going nuclear. There were traditional slanted right critics (paleocons) who felt such a deal would alienate the much needed support of nuclear armed Mohammedan Pakistan on the War on Terror.

President Bush had managed to swing
Congressional approval of the nuclear deal with India. Unfortunately the irony of ironies is occurring in the Indian Parliament. The Left block (Marxist/Communist associated Parties) which make up part of the ruling Parliamentary coalition of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh are working to strike down the deal. That is an irony because the Left in America tentatively seems to have signed on to the deal. The reason: traditional Marxist aversion to a Capitalist America as a global hegemon and the Marxist Indian’s fear of America manipulating India’s foreign policy.

Prime Minister Singh has been lobbying hard with the Indian Parliament however
it appears headed to defeat.

I suspect the Marxists in India’s Parliament wish to continue an
affinity with former Communist Russia (though apparently becoming hostile toward America) and Communist China.

This is an indication to me that has its own version of polarizing politics: The old politicians of India wish to stay connected to past associations with Russia and it’s off and on again relationship with China. A new guard of Indian politicians needs to assert themselves because on paper it would seem an America/India partnership would benefit both nations in National Security and the economics of prosperity as a counter weight to Chinese ambitions to be a global military and economic hegemon at India’s expense.

I believe the ruling Indian elites are missing the big picture for the future growth and security, especially since Islamofascism is attacking India nearly as much as America. The American Media fails to report the significance of radical Islamists committing acts of terrorism against the Hindi majority of India’s population.

Let us hope President Bush and Prime Minister Singh can pull out a twelfth hour turn around for both nations’ sake.

Monday, October 22, 2007

PA Tells Arabs One Thing and Israel/America Another

Even as the Bush Administration and Prime Minister Olmert explore a point of concession to establish another Arab nation which will be called Palestine, the official television network of the Palestinian Authority (i.e. operated by Fatah terrorists) shows a map on their network on October 11, 2007 of Israel as the sovereign nation of Palestine.

What is the concession? Actually the concession is numerous and dangerous for Israel’s existence: the giving up of what Israelis call portions of Judea and Samaria and the West calls the West Bank. The heinous concession on the table for discussion is
dividing Jerusalem between Israel and the emerging repugnant State of Palestine.

How is this coming about? The Bush Administration is twisting the Israeli government arm to establish a “Palestine” on Arab terms and Olmert is acquiescing to the arm twist at Jewish expense.

Palestine Authority (PA) President (also Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman) Mahmoud Abbas controls the content station PATV. Somebody explain to me how that makes Abbas a trustworthy partner in negotiation to keep any bargains he submits? It is extremely apparent that Abbas is following in Yasser Arafat’s footsteps of telling the West and Israel anything they want to hear and telling the Arabs called Palestinians that the destruction of Jewish Israel is imminent.

I submit that the creation of a Palestinian State will lead to a blood bath of either Jews or Mohammedan Arabs. How can I say this? I can say so because once the Arabs of the Palestinian Authority under the direction of the umbrella terrorist network known as the PLO becomes a sovereign Palestine, that horrific nation of State thuggery will have the tools to negotiate with rogue nations and arms dealing nations (Russia and China) for a military designed to invade the rest of Israel.

Someone will win and it won’t be pretty. Not only that, due to the current investment of America in the Middle East due to the War on Terror, America will participate in that Israeli/Palestinian war. And if America participates then certainly Iran will follow the Palestinians with Russia joining closely on Iran's heals. I say
Russia because the Old Bear has warned off Western nations from attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities. If Iran and Syria partner to support a Palestine, America will attack Iran’s military capabilities – including the nuclear facilities. Russia will have to do something or face international disgrace (again) in talking big but not yielding clout.

A sovereign Palestinian State will lead to this scenario.

It would be better for the
Arab nations surrounding Israel to admit their mistake in creating a group of Arab refugees and matriculate those Arabs into their nations. The biggest candidate for the matriculation is Jordan since its existence was intended for the Arabs while a sliver of land was to be reserved for Israel. This was a League of Nations Mandate given to the British then a United Nations Mandate before third world dictators and Arab nationalists backed by oil infected the World Body with corruption.

Just as the British shafted the Jewish people just after WWI to appease the aid that was given by Arabs to defeat the Ottoman Turks, there is the appearance the American government is preparing a raw deal for Israel for global considerations of oil and the need for Middle Eastern allies in the War on Terror. Thus once again Israel is being placed in a position to negotiate away their land acquired by victory during numerous attacks by Arabs to exterminate Israel and Jews. This includes the holiest site to all Judaism and the most significant site to Christendom – Jerusalem.

GOP Debate: Who is More Conservative?

As usual in this stage of the political game I did not watch the GOP debate last night. I prefer to read or hear an analysis on television.

On Fox and Friends this morning I received the impression the debate theme was the most qualified Republican to defeat Hillary in 2008.

On the
CBN coverage of the debate, the implication the theme was who is the best Conservative to attract the Christian Right which has been the king maker for the last two Presidential elections.

Ferguson: One Strike, Iran Could be Out

In light of President Bush’s WWIII warning if Iran continues progress on weapons grade uranium production that could lead to a nuclear arsenal, an Iranian General spouted that the Islamofascist nation could launch 11,000 missiles in a moment if America and its coalition of the willing attack Iran’s nuclear facilities. In other words Iran is saying if you rattle your sabers we can rattle our sabers.

Historian Niall Ferguson had predicted in January (well a fictional potential prediction) 2006 that a massive war would begin in the Middle East as a result of Iran’s nuclear program. Ferguson even thought there might a nuclear exchange between Israel and Iran.

Ferguson has written some updated thoughts to that 2006 opinion article. I get the impression Ferguson believes that Iran still should be prevented from acquiring the kind of nuclear power that results in nuclear weapons. In the present though he believes America would have a more difficult time accomplishing a preventative military strike because American allies and pseudo-allies are not hip to the idea.

Plus Ferguson points out that the locations of U.S. Aircraft Carriers are not conducive to an immediate strike, there is only one currently in the Persian Gulf area.

Ferguson also ponders since most of the national attention on American leadership is on candidates running for President, would President Bush be so bold as to unilaterally strike Iranian nuke sites.

Read Ferguson’s Op-Ed to get the specific and fascinating thoughts on a nuclear Iran.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Ivy Leaguer Implies Jewish Race Subhuman

This is an enlightening YouTube video that may explain why Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was invited to Columbia University.

If you catch the revelation as to what at least one Columbia University Professor (probably more) might think of the Jewish Race, what do you think an Ivy League University is teaching the cultural elite leadership of America’s future?

Hint: The Professor is a Mohammedan.

And here is a by the way: If Columbia U. claims it was promoting “Free Speech” by inviting Ahmadinejad, why were the makers of this video censored by the Columbia U. bureaucracy?

Code Pink are the Real Traitors

Okay I realize this is Move America Forward email is a promotional demonstrating the success of actions supporting American Troops defending America by fighting the War on Terror.

Its purpose is to raise money to keep the work of battling anti-war morons and Leftists from undermining the war effort under the delusion that disengaging from the war will bring peace and harmony to America. Of course this could not be further from the truth: the anti-war movement has essentially become a propaganda tool for terrorists.

Thus I am posting Move America Forward event that bested American traitors
Code Pink. (San Francisco Chronicle amazingly even handed reporting on the Move America Forward/Code Pink clash in Berkley. PipelineNews has a huge amount of pictures with the by-line “Move America Forward Counter Demonstration Crushes Code Pink In Berkeley.”)

JRH 10/19/07

Code Pink are the REAL TRAITORS E-Newsletter
Thu, 18 Oct 2007

News is spreading across the nation about what happened in Berkeley, California yesterday - when hundreds upon hundreds of patriotic Americans jammed the streets of Berkeley to denounce the anti-military protests of the Marxist group, Code Pink.

Code Pink, the same group that traveled to Iraq and gave $600,000 to the families of terrorist insurgents who kill U.S. troops, had defaced and vandalized the U.S. Marine Recruiting Center in Berkeley. They called our troops "traitors" but it is not our troops who are traitors - it is Code Pink.

Yesterday we unveiled a new Move America Forward t-shirt, sweatshirt and hooded sweatshirt with the message: "
Code Pink are the REAL TRAITORS" and now we are excited to announce that you can get those shirts online.

Get your "Code Pink are the REAL TRAITORS" shirts -

Benazir Bhutto Rankles Pakistani Islamofascists by HER Return

Apparently America and Britain are counting on female Benazir Bhutto to share power with Musharraf to counter a growing Islamist sentiment in Pakistan.

According to the
Telegraph a huge rally of support gathered for Bhutto in Karachi.

Man that has to chap the hide of intolerant male domineering women as chattel Islamofascists when they see a female welcomed as a popular leader. And there is more than the popularity; Bhutto is at least giving lip service to another hated concept of Islamofascists – democracy.

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Hillary’s ‘Do as I say, not as I Do’ Tapes

Here is some poop on the Democratic Party front runner Hillary Clinton. As you know Leftist Democrats including Hillary Clinton wish to protect the privacy of terrorists and terrorist supporters and terrorist sympathizers. The Democrats and Hillary have painted a picture of President Bush as evil with privacy issues in which the Administration practices of Security have prevented another 9/11 style attack from occurring on American soil.

We can couple this loser attitude with hypocrisy.
Hillary listened to audio recordings of illegally intercepted mobile phone conversations of Clinton political opponents.

The image projected by Hillary is that the government cannot on spy on suspected Americans treasonously doing something for America’s enemies in a time of War yet it is perfectly fine to listen to political opponents private conversations to get poop to smear the opponent’s reputation or plan an agenda to disable a political opponents strategy.

Is this “do as I say, not as I do” Leftist the kind of person America wishes to have as its President?

JRH (Hat tip to: dox ^ 2.)

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear

Here is a little news byte picked up by BREIBART.COM: Just as Putin put forth a veiled threat to anyone who might attack Iran’s nuclear program, President shoots back with a warning of WWIII if Iran become’s a nuclear WMD power.

JRH 10/17/07

Bush warns of World War III if Iran goes nuclear

AFP Wire
Oct 17 11:45 AM US/Eastern

US President George W. Bush said Wednesday that he had warned world leaders they must prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons "if you're interested in avoiding World War III."

"We've got a leader in Iran who has announced that he wants to destroy Israel," Bush said at a White House press conference after Russia cautioned against military action against Tehran's supect (sic) atomic program.

"So I've told people that, if you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," said Bush.


Russia has been revising it geopolitical stance slowly moving back to a Cold War image of Russia VS the West with the USA in mind in particular.

Russia has been playing brinksmanship with Britain in the air and in protecting Russian assassins who killed on British soil a Russian protected by the British government.

Russia is playing brinksmanship in the Arctic Ocean relating to natural resources around
the North Pole.

Russia has demanded the USA
not build an anti-ballistic missile security system in Poland and the Czech Republic. America’s reasoning (publicly anyway) is that Europe needs an umbrella of protection from Iranian long range missiles which may eventually contain nuclear warheads. Russia’s stand is such a security system undermines Russia’s deterrent strategy with Europe: So much for Russian matriculation into the Western democratic lifestyle.

With a little guess work on might see another reason for Russia’s stand against an ABM system in Eastern Europe. Russia is building Iran’s nuclear plant. As part of that Russian/Iranian partnership further Putin brinksmanship have proceeded from the lips of the Russian President.
Putin is warning the U.S. or any nation that might threaten to militarily attack Iran’s nuclear aspirations.

That sounds like a veiled threat of a Russian military response to any sane nation preventing insane Iran from acquiring weapons grade uranium to arm Iranian long range missiles.

Although Russia is still in the realm plausible deniability there is an appearance of a plan of Russia allying itself with Islamofascist rogue nations such as Syria and Iran. If Arabs calling themselves Palestinians schmooze their way into a sovereign nation, you can bet it will join Islamofascist rogue nations. I also suspect that Hezbollah will either usurp Lebanon’s political rule or divide the nation with a Lebanon in the north a southern nation we can call Hezbollahstan.

Who would supply the military arms to a progressive Islamofascist Middle Eastern disease? Naturally it would be Russia. This is the same Russia that was the former Soviet Union that armed Egypt, Syria and Jordan in a perpetual goal of eliminating Israel.

What is the Russian motivation? After all Russia has had their own experience with Islamofascist terrorists with Chechen separatists murdering Russian children and teachers at a school.

For Russia ideology is irrelevant. It does not matter if it Czarist Russia, Soviet/Communist Russia or the current Russian republic; Russian nationalism has sought global hegemony in order not to be the victim of invasions. Russia trusts no one. Currently America is a global hyper-super power hegemon. The obvious Russian strategy is to stretch American National Interests so much that a potential collapse occurs via over extension.

Russia has cleverly used their traditional enemies via agreement or military supply to stretch America.

Communist China has not exactly been friendly with Russia over the years even when they shared the same Marxist ideology. Yet China is an emerging Super Power that also wants to compete with American hegemony. Russian and Chinese cooperation although tentative is effectively giving geopolitical power to Islamofascist rogue nations and ultimately stateless Islamofascist terrorists.

When America and Israel had an opportunity to end Iran’s nuke program with little more than the threat of Iranian terrorism and global protests, they failed by yielding to diplomatic Appeasers. Now that Russia is extending veiled protection to Iran’s nuclear program, it will a more difficult decision to carpet bomb Iran’s nuclear industrial military complex. Now it is a guess if Russia is bluffing or not. An effective diplomatic lesson learned from Iran.

I have gone from favoring an attack on Iran to a wait and see if Russia, Iran, Syria or Waziristan-Pakistani terrorists step over a line that forces an American response. America has given up a preemptive posture to awaiting another 911/Pearl Harbor victim posture.

Unless Israel and America is of a gambling nature and call Russia to see if their warning is a bluff.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Judicial Branch: Religious Expressions & Religious Liberties

Proud Infidel (Formerly Twana’s Blog) has found a monograph about America’s activist Judiciary and the intended historical role the Founding Fathers conceived of the Judicial Branch.

It is written by David Barton, a Christian Right Historian who is awesome in refuting Slanted Left historical revisionism in American History.

It is a MUST READ.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Nov. 1, 2007: Internet Taxation?

Check this out! November 1, 2007 is the day that a moratorium on taxation of the Internet ends. The meaning is this: if there is no extension or permanent moratorium on Internet taxation that State, Federal or both can tax Internet usage.

Guess which Political Party is blocking an extension on the moratorium of Internet taxation. O let us see, which Party is noted for raising taxes?

O yes, it is the Democratic Party.

Read what Representative Lamar Smith has to say about taxing the Internet.

After reading Smith’s assessment, what do you think about Internet taxation?


There have long been rumors that Prime Minister Olmert of Israel was willing to give up half of Jerusalem as part of the package to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (aka Abu Mazen). Incidentally Abbas is as much a thug terrorist as any terrorist organization connected to the Arab movement to form a sovereign Palestinian nation.

Abbas took over the mantle of Yasser Arafat as Chairman of the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) which is a loose confederation of terrorists that has inflicted murderous terror on Israel. Egypt and the Arab League formed the PLO in 1964 to create a mythological people of Arabs termed Palestinians.

You see the irony is in 1948 the United Nations (prior to becoming sympathetic to Islamist Arabs and anti-Israel) divided the British Palestinian Mandate into to two nations: Israel and Transjordan. Obviously the Jews were to be sovereign in Israel and the Arabs to be sovereign in Transjordan under the hegemony of the Bedouin Hashemite Kingdom. The U.N. even gave a largely favorable amount of land to the Arabs while limiting the size of Israel to a nearly thin slice of indefensible land.

Mohammedan Arabs could not tolerate that Jews were becoming sovereign in what they considered Dar al-Islam land (i.e. land controlled by Islam as opposed to Dar al-Harb, land controlled by the infidel).

Thus Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Transjordan and a few other minor players all surrounding Israel attacked in 1948 just after Israeli Independence. Arabs living within the borders of Israel fled prior to the invasion expecting a Mohammedan victory to return them to their homes as well as fearing Israeli reprisals on life and property while their Arab brethren were attacking.

Why am I providing a minor (and admittedly slanted) history lesson? The reason is the point there were no Palestinians in 1948. Specifically there were citizens of Israel (primarily Jews) and citizens of Transjordan (primarily Arab Mohammedan Transjordanian citizens).

After Israel spanked Egypt, Syria, the future Jordan and the Arab bit players in 1948; the Mohammedans egos were bruised. Thus instead of incorporating the Arabs into the various invading lands – Jordan in particular – it was decided by the invaders to make a group of Arabs stateless people with the appellation of Palestinian refugee to create a perpetual chaotic wedge to habitually attack Israel with the intent of destroying the Israeli nation.

From 1948 through the current day, Mohammedans have taught hatred of Jewish people and later Christians in Dar al-Islam to Mohammedan Arab children until a generation of ingrained hate exists in the Middle Eastern Mohammedan mind.

Invasions and threats of extermination have been the goal of Middle Eastern Mohammedan nations ever since 1948. Every time a Mohammedan war was executed against Israel, the Mohammedans have been spanked even though they had superior numbers. (Now tell that is not a God thing!)

One of those invasions in 1967 became a godsend for the Jews of Israel. Again Egypt, Syria and Jordan attacked Israel to exterminate the nation. This time a Six Day miracle occurred. Not only were the three invaders spanked but in six days Israel occupied Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, Syria’s Golan Heights and the territory retained by Jordan after the first 1948 invasion now called the West Bank by the world and Judea and Samaria by the Israelis. Part of that West Bank acquisition is land that Jews (and Christians) have considered the land of the Jews by heritage. This included East Jerusalem, Bethlehem and burial sites of Jewish Patriarchs.

The most important of which was the unification of Jerusalem (the City of David) under Israeli control. AND the most important fact about the unification of Jerusalem is that the Holiest of site to all Judaism came under Israeli possession – the Temple Mount.

The great mystery to me was the Israeli government’s decision to allow the Jordanian linked Mohammedan Waqf to control the Temple Mount where two Mohammedan Mosques are located – the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Yes I realize Mohammedans consider those two Mosques to be the third holiest site to them. Let us think about that one; Third: meaning one, two, and three. That means the Mohammedans control number one and two – Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia. Mecca and Medina are actual place the pseudo-prophet Mohammed resided. Mohammed had never been to Jerusalem physically. Mohammed’s successors developed a myth from the Quran (in which Jerusalem is not named) that Mohammed took off from a Mosque in Jerusalem on winged horse to heaven and back. The problem historically is that there was no Mosque in Jerusalem that was controlled by the Byzantine Empire in Mohammed’s lifetime. Thus it is impossible for Jerusalem to be the location of the Quranic “furthermost Mosque.” To accept Jerusalem as the furthermost Mosque would prove the Quran is a lie. I seriously doubt any Mohammedan would accept that.

The greatest error in my estimation is that Israel did not take physical control of the Temple Mount graciously allowing the Mohammedan Mosques to operate for the
religion of peace. I mean it is not like the Mohammedans are to stop attacking Israel to eradicate a Jewish existence in the Middle East.

Now we have come to the point in which Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is preparing to transfer the 1967 miracle back to Mohammedan control, including half of Jerusalem which includes the Temple Mount.

In American terms that is like becoming a Benedict Arnold. In Christian terms that is like becoming a Judas Iscariot. In Jewish terms it is like becoming
Korah, Dathan and Abiram.

Olmert is selling out his race, his faith and his nation. Whether it is to the
Arabs who call themselves Palestinians or to Jordan it is treasonous and could lead to the demise of Israel as Mohammedans have stealthily armed themselves with weapons and technology from America.

Other links of interest related to the Olmert sell out from
Arutz Sheva 7 (Israel National News):

Jordan Replaces P.A. in MK Elon's Peace Plan

US Presidential Candidate Endorses Elon's "Israeli Initiative"

Rabbi Elyashiv Joins Battle For Jerusalem

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Islam: Women, Freedom and Liberty

If you listen to a Mohammedan about womanhood you might have heard such lies as a woman is protected and has equality.

And yet one reads of
honor killings of Mohammedan women in Western culture because of some moral insult to their faith. Can you imagine that? In Western democracies where allegedly an individual is free to choose a religion or not, choose a level of morality, choose a style of living according to one’s means and so on; a religious order comes to the West in which its tenets of faith absolutely come into conflict with Liberty and Freedom and people die in an honor killing or because an offense was given to their deity and pseudo-prophet.

Now what blows my mind, the West has hopped onto the band wagon of political correctness out of concern for insulting diverse individuals or religions. Thus Mohammedans become homicidal maniacs, the inherently violent for religious reasons or rapists because it is morally acceptable to rape an infidel. These things are ALL tolerated in the West.

God forbid that a Westerner hold a person accountable because their foreign religion or creed says that heinous illegal acts can be executed scripturally. This infection of blind tolerance is pervasive in Europe toward Mohammedanism. The police will not enforce the rule of law in neighborhoods or communities in which Mohammedans are the majority.

The rule of law is still enforced in America if the Mohammedan murderer or assaulter is caught; however the honor killing of women still happens and violence among intolerant Mohammedans still occur in America. Will America ever forsake their legal rule of law heritage like Europe and proffer protection for Mohammedan peculiarities and hold a different standard for non-Mohammedan? Let us pray not.

There is a blogger who has adopted the nom de plume of Curmudgeon Emeritus and has written an excellent piece on Mohammedanism and women. Man you have got to