Friday, October 31, 2008

Could BHO Birth Certificate Become a Constitutional Crisis?

The Law Suit brought by Philip Berg to challenge Barack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status to be constitutionally eligible to be elected President has not been a part of the Mainstream Media (MSM). Actually I can understand the MSM dismissal as newsworthy as to the particulars of the Law Suit.

Berg’s argument seems to be BHO has not provided a notarize Birth Certificate from the State of Hawaii. Further Berg’s argument is that BHO was born in Kenya, Africa.

So let’s presume all the above is true. Would that make Barack Hussein ineligible to be President of the USA? I mean I am no constitutional expert but I thought the qualifications was to be at least age 35 and American citizen born from at least one American parent. If I am wrong in that understanding someone point me to the constitutional law that is specific.

I am guessing Berg believes that a person has to be born on USA soil to qualify to be elected President.

So here’s the deal: Berg’s law suit was dismissed in Federal Court. Judge Surrick ruled Berg lacked standing to bring such a law suit because he was just a mere citizen of the USA. The implication a special citizen in government such as a Congressman or Executive Department are the only ones eligible to bring such a suit.

Now I think Berg’s law suit is frivolous thinking the Courts would rule anything against BHO; however Judge Surrick’s ruling restricts the typical U.S. citizen from questioning the legitimacy of a candidate for President questioning his citizenship.


If the Judge just would have did his job to rule on the law suits merits and decide to continue or not continue it is quite likely BHO would have been certified that his mommy was an American citizen. So what if it was discovered BHO was born in Kenya rather than in Hawaii. Mommy was an American citizen.

Now the dipstick Judge may have
placed the election into a Constitutional Crisis if the Supreme Court rules there are indeed a “standing” for an American citizen to ask for proof of documented citizenship.

JRH 10/31/08

Murtha on Carpetbaggers

Now this is creepy. Jack (the traitor) Murtha is out of touch with his own district and deserves to loose to William Russell who Murtha calls a carpetbagger. Why a carpetbagger? Because Russell while on active duty was stationed in Virginia. After retirement Russell moved his family to Pennsylvania where he was once stationed. This has Marine hater Murtha believe that Russell is a carpetbagger.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama Jedi Mind Trick

So this how American voters have been mesmerized.

Dictators Mock Obama's Ignorance

This satire on Barack Hussein Obama’s leadership is ironically not off course. BHO is the guy that wishes to sit down at the table with hostile nations with NO preconditions. I suspect the reason for that is BHO is either friends or ideologically sympathetic with America’s enemies.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Damning Obama/Khalidi Tape?

I am confidant that many readers are already enlightened of how the L.A. Times is being a typical Mainstream Media (MSM) supporter of Barack Hussein Obama by elaborating on a story they released (probably regrettably now) in which BHO is schmoozing with Terrorists (domestic and Palestinian) which included anti-Semitic and anti-Israel words.

I first heard about it on Fox News this morning on the Fox and Friends broadcast. The topic of discussion concerned the thought that the L.A. Times was so pro-Obama that they would not release a video of the party in which BHO notably praised Rashid Khalidi.

Since many that read this blog are fully aware that I am not exactly a friend the theo-political aspects of the religion of Mohammedanism (Islam to its adherents and PC academics), you are probably thinking “There he goes again.”

I am certain the PC crowd can appreciate that Yasser Arafat was a heinous murdering Palestinian-Arab terrorist who did more to exploit his fellow Arabs than to aid them. Check it out! Rashid Khalidi was a former mouthpiece for Yasser Arafat. That means he mouthed the Islamofascist dream of destroying Israel and the Mohammedan version of the “Final Solution.”

That means Barack Hussein Obama went to a party to praise Khalidi – a man that wishes the death and destruction Israel and the anti-Semitic Mohammedan perception that Jews were transformed into monkeys and swine.

The American voting public has a right to know just how much of a liar Barack Hussein Obama is. The Times has said it cannot release the video because of a promise to the confidential source that delivered the tape.

Since it is obvious that the MSM is pro-Obama no matter the cost it should give voters pause to ponder:

    1. Did the Times really make a promise to a confidential source?

    2. If the Times made such a promise about withholding the video from public scrutiny, for the sake of balanced news coverage (as opposed to news coverage meant to influence) why has the Times NOT provided a transcript of the video?

    3. Is the Times so pro-Obama that the rag WILL NOT write about the specific content without releasing the video or a transcript? Writing editorially about the content would not breach the confidentiality of the source.

The McCain camp should do the very thing the MSM is reluctant to do. Daily bring attention to voters that the L.A. Times is hiding information that might be damaging to Barack Hussein Obama. I mean the MSM had no problem in trying to find dirt or creating dirt that was not there on Governor Palin. It is time for Conservatives to take upon the job of investigative reporting that the MSM is TOTALLY unwilling to do concerning BHO.

You need to read the eloquent thoughts on the L.A. Times from Andrew C. McCarthy.

JRH 10/29/08

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Is Crooked Liar Murtha on the Ropes? Should Be!

Rep Jack Murtha (D. PA) has been lauded as a respectable and knowledgeable Congressman pertaining to military affairs in Congress. Murtha has even touted a war hero record that included Purple Hurts indicating he was wounded while serving America in Vietnam.

The thing is though that Murtha has come out STRONG against the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) in Iraq. This astounding stand that HAS BEEN (emphasis on “has been”) touted by what many believed to be a Democratic Party friend of the Military started many a conservative to look into Murtha’s public credentials.

As the self-proclaimed war hero in the Senate (
John Kerry), apparently there is also some murky lack of transparency of Murtha’s war record in Vietnam. Typically the Left has stood by their man Murtha as they did Kerry by calling the questioning of Murtha’s record as Conservative Swift Boating. As if the Swift Boat vets were discredited. They were NOT. Ironically comes out on the side of validating Kerry’s version of his medals; however fails to use substantiated materials. In stead utilizes eyewitness accounts favorable toward Kerry while the Swift Boat Vets utilize eyewitness accounts unfavorable to Kerry. The Kerry paper trail is enigmatically dubious, yet Kerry’s post war antics of the anti-American anti-war Left of the Sixties and Seventies (Hmm … Wasn’t Bill Ayers in that crowd as well?).

So what’s my point?

Murtha’s record is as mysterious and dubious as Kerry’s record was.

Here is another mystery for the Murtha proclaimed “racists” and “rednecks” of his district should consider on Election Day: Jack Murtha was involved in one the worst Congressional scandals of American history –
ABSCAM. I am not even going to mention Murtha’s cut-n-run opinion about the GWOT being fought in Iraq; however Murtha has come out as a political scum in denigrating the very Marine Corps he served in by reckless announcing to the press that a group of Marines slaughtered a number of Iraqi civilians at Haditha. The Murtha accusation became dubbed by the Leftist MSM as the Haditha Massacre. It should have been labeled the Haditha Incident, because every Marine has been exonerated except one who still faces his day in Military Court.

Rep. Jack Murtha does not deserve the incumbent shoe-in. Murtha deserves to loose to his challenger William Russell.

The Pennsylvania Murtha/Russell campaign is heating up as the polls indicate that voters are finally becoming enlightened to the kind of anti-American, anti-Military, cut-n-run crook that Murtha is.

Here are some details from an email promotional from
Move America Forward Freedom PAC looking for dough to aid William Russell in the tightening race: GO TO THE END OF THIS POST AT TO READ THE MAFFPAC EMAIL.

JRH 10/28/08

Monday, October 27, 2008

Hallelujah! Jerusalem May yet Remain ONE

The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is still on the Eternal Throne. Israel’s Shas Party has refused to join Tzipi Livni (protégé of corrupt out going Prime Minister Ehud Olmert) in forming a Kadima led government.

What was the reason?
Shas wanted a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty while Olmert and Livni are under the delusion that dividing Jerusalem will bring peace to Israel. Jerusalem is the heritage of Judaism not Mohammedanism. Mohammedan conquerors consolidated their control of Jerusalem in the mid-600’s A.D. and purposefully built two Mosques on the Temple Mount (by the way both of which were built AFTER Mohammed’s death). Jerusalem has been a political ploy only significant to Mohammedans when their attention benefits Mohammedanism.

Livni has given up on finding another political partner and has notified Israel’s President Peres
she cannot form a government and thus elections will be required.

According to Israeli polls, Binyamin Netanyahu of Likud will handily be the majority Party after the next Israeli election.

Due to the Parliamentary system in Israel Ehud Olmert is still actually the Prime Minister until elections can sort out a Party coalition probably under Likud’s leadership rather Olmert/Livni’s Kadima leadership. Christian Zionists (and I do mean that endearingly) and religious Jews can only pray that the Knesset can prevent the deluded Olmert (under the direction of the Bush Administration) from
splitting Jerusalem between Israel and Israel’s mortal enemy – Arabs that call themselves Palestinians (Mohammedans).

JRH 10/27/08

Sunday, October 26, 2008

"One Vote" -

We know how Barack Hussein Obama feels about Bible believing Christians:

"they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." – Chicago Sun-Times.

I know voters are concerned about the economy. I am a Bible believing Christian and I am more concerned that BHO will use a Leftist activist Judiciary to nullify the freedom of Bible believing Christians; specifically the First Amendment, the Second Amendment and America’s foundation of Christian heritage.

Pay close attention to this YouTube video that was shared with me by the
American Family Association. Honor God and vote Christian Values and America’s economy will turn around as blessed by God Almighty.

Share The Land a Tribute to USMC 3 5 Dark Horse

Hat tip to Humbled Infidel.

A President Obama will Gut U.S. Military

If elected President on November 4, 2008 Obama intends to gut the U.S. military to reverse the Reagan strategy of peace through strength (Reagan policies aided in bringing down USSR) to the ludicrous delusion of peace through de-militarized weakness.

Many critics of the Reagan “peace through strength” doctrine claim the USSR was in route to a collapse regardless of Reagan military growth. This is Leftist revisionism not taking into account that peace through strength may have prevented a Soviet Union act of desperation utilizing nuclear threats or launches in an effort to even the super power playing field.

The American military build-up probably prevented any acts of Communist Soviet confrontation. It is the very reason
ex-Communist ruling elites are going nuts of the Missile Defense Shield being built in Poland and the Czech Republic. The Shield would give America/NATO forces an advantage to a remilitarizing Russia.

Barack Hussein Obama’s strategy of giving up everything plus the kitchen sink will turn America into a paper tiger ripe for the Islamofascist Crescent to slash the paper in future attacks.

Here are some excerpts from a
MAF Freedom Pac email sent out to alert America of the BHO intent to gut our Military:


    Just as the Taliban and other American-hating Jihadists are staging new attacks on America and her allies, liberals in Congress want to cut the United States’ military by another 25 percent. This is outrageous and will put the United States at high risk for another 9/11.Rep. Barney Frank, (D-Mass.) wants to give more money to food stamps and cut military spending by 25 percent. Read about this outrageous proposal here."We'll have to raise taxes ultimately. Not now, but eventually," Frank told the Standard Times.“In the middle of a war on two fronts, Barack Obama plans to gut the military. He also wants to dismantle our nuclear arsenal. And he wants to keep you in the dark about it,” according to Investor's Business Daily.

    MAF Freedom PAC has been throughout the country fighting for pro-troop candidates. Liberals have HUGE warchests, and they want total control of the presidency, House and Senate so they can raise taxes and decimate our military.

    Can you imagine the nightmare of Obama as Commander in Chief with an anti-military Congress to rubber stamp his leftist policies? Even a McCain presidency will need a cooperative Congress.Ronald Reagan just proved that PEACE through STRENTH works! Yet, we have the potential of electing a Congress that believes WEAKNESS will make our enemies love us and end threats against us. How naïve? They are no different than the nuclear freeze crazies during the Reagan era who thought the way to defeat communism was to submit!We cannot submit to radical Islamic terrorism, which is exactly what we will end up doing if we don’t keep up our military strength. If he is elected and the Democrats increase their numbers in Congress, the Barney Frank liberals will take us back to the days when our military was devastated and Osama bin Laden took advantage of our weaknesses to attack on Sept. 11, 2001.

    Obama and a larger liberal Congress will be downright dangerous to America’s security. Join MAF-PAC as we fight through the last days of this important election.

Note the link to Investor’s Net Daily. This is where you want to go to read some specifics of how BHO lies. He tells his fellow traveler Leftists that he will gut the American Military, yet at nearly all Mainstream Media (MSM) BHO talks about how if elected President he will be tough on terrorism seeking to kill Osama Bin Laden if the opportunity arises. HELLO! If BHO keeps his promise to his fellow travelers he cannot keep his promise to the American voters about being tough on terrorism. The two promises are diametrically opposed to each other.

You really should
READ THE IND editorial!

JRH 10/26/08

Saturday, October 25, 2008

The ZombieTime Goods on BHO Lies about Ayers

WOW! I am certain by now anyone that is half way paying to the Presidential race 2008 is aware of the McCain camp (and more so my fellow Slanted Right writers) saying that Bill Ayers has had a highly influential connection to Barack Hussein Obama.

BHO has brilliantly attempted to fool voters (with the heinous collusion of a pro-Obama Mainstream Media) that he barely known Bill Ayers. I say brilliant because voters are so sold on BHO that his poll numbers have been consistently higher than John McCain’s numbers. I have to reiterate that polls are deceptive for there seem to be as many polls showing nearly double digits in a BHO poll lead while other polls show a mere single digit lead. The incredible point though is the Barack Hussein Obama according to the polls is in the lead.

Now I can understand Leftist voters being gaw-gaw for BHO, after all Leftists are made from the same Left (Communist/Marxist/Socialist) political DNA. I can understand that the stalwart Slanted Right voters are against BHO.

What I cannot understand is how America’s centrist and undecided are leaning toward a Barack Hussein Obama Presidency!

BHO has pulled off one of the greatest character flim-flams in American political history (to date).

I believe I have discovered one of the most definitive blog posts on Bill Ayers. Ayers condemns (or hypes if you are a Leftist) himself in his own words as a murdering Communist bent on the delusion of overthrowing the U.S. government and exterminating Americans who did not tow the fantastical new Communist government line. The number I read was a willingness to kill over 25 million Americans.

I am going to cross post this at the best that I can. I write “the best that I can” because the post has numerous scanned copies of Bill Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn’s published American-Terrorist Communist Manifesto entitled Prairie Fire. To view the actual scans GO THERE.JRH 10/25/08 (Hat tip NetRight Nation)

[SlantRight Editor: Because of the Uncertainty of how long will be operational, I am doing a copy and pasted of the article I cross posted there. 3/2/12]

William Ayers' forgotten communist manifesto: Prairie Fire

posted: October 22, 2008

William Ayers is a communist. But don't take my word for it. He said so himself:

We are a guerilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years.

And not some nicey-nice peace-and-love kind of communist. Through his group the Weather Underground, Ayers was planning to "seize power" in a violent communist takeover of the United States:

We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society.

The quotes above were scanned directly from a now long-forgotten book entitled Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism, which was written and published in 1974 by William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and other members of the Weather Underground. In this slim volume, which functioned as the Weather Underground's ideological manifesto, Ayers declares himself to be a communist, and announces that his group's bombing campaign was intended to start a violent revolution to overthrow the American government.

After a long search, I was lucky enough to finally get my hands on a copy of the original edition of Prairie Fire, which is now extremely rare and hard to find. It was written in secret while Ayers and his fellow Weather Underground members were still in hiding and on the run, and still actively engaging in bombings and other violent acts.

This essay features many high-resolution scans of quotes and entire pages taken directly from Prairie Fire, which journalists, bloggers and other media members are free to copy and re-post. [SlantRight Editor: Go to to view the scans.]

If you're interested only in viewing or downloading the scans taken from Prairie Fire, scroll down this page to see a large selection of shocking quotations which you can use as you see fit. My introductory explanation below simply provides context and elucidates why the text of Prairie Fire is so significant at this very moment in history.

So far in 2008, there has been almost no mention of this manifesto and its insurrectionary goals. It seems as if the media, William Ayers, Barack Obama and his supporters don't want you to know about Prairie Fire. Which is exactly why you need to see it.

How Is This Relevant to the 2008 Presidential Campaign?

There's nothing illegal about being a communist. People in this country are free to hold whatever political beliefs they so choose. I don't know William Ayers, I've never met him (that I'm aware of), and I have nothing against him personally.

This essay only exists to correct and unequivocably debunk claims routinely made by the mainstream media over the last few weeks about William Ayers, his beliefs, and the purpose behind his bombing campaign during the 1970s.

Specifically, when questions arose during the 2008 presidential race about Barack Obama's past associations with William Ayers, many media reports and articles blandly described Ayers as a "Vietnam-era radical" and the Weather Underground as a group that set bombs "to protest against the Vietnam War." Both of these characterizations are demonstrably inaccurate.

Furthermore: Obama and his supporters at first claimed he barely knew who Ayers was, but when public awareness of the connections between Obama and Ayers became too numerous and too strong to deny, Obama's supporters have now begun resorting to a fallback position: that William Ayers wasn't such a bad guy after all, and that it is no shame to be associated with him. The now-standard talking points are:

    • Ayers was simply protesting against the Vietnam War, and a lot of people protested against the Vietnam War back then, so there's no shame in that.

    • Ayers was never actually convicted of setting any bombs or killing anyone, so there's no real proof that he ever did anything wrong.

    • Ayers is now a respected, mainstream, mild-mannered and popular professor, so obviously his political views couldn't have been that extreme.

    This essay disproves all of these claims. The text that William Ayers authored in Prairie Fire, and the additional documentary links provided below, prove that:

    • Ayers was not simply protesting "against" the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn't against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn't against the war, he was against our side in the war. This is spelled out in great detail in Prairie Fire. Secondly, and more significantly, the Vietnam War was only one of many issues cited by the Weather Undergound as the justifications for their violent acts. As you will see below, in various quotes from Prairie Fire and in their own list of their violent actions (and in additional impartial documentary links), Ayers and the Weather Underground enumerated dozens of different grievances as the rationales for their bombings -- their overarching goal being to inspire a violent mass uprising against the United States government in order to establish a communist "dictatorship of the proletariat," in Ayers' own words.

    • Ayers and his co-authors freely brag about their bombings and other violent and illegal acts, and even provide a detailed list, most likely typed up by Ayers himself, of the crimes they had committed up to that point. Ayers' list, scanned directly from Prairie Fire, is shown below. He may have escaped conviction due to a legal technicality (the prosecutors failed to get a warrant during some of their surveillance of the Weather Underground), but this in no way means that Ayers was factually innocent of the crimes. As has been widely reported, after the case against him was dropped, Ayers decribed himself as "guilty as hell, free as a bird."

    • Just because Ayers tries to appear respectable now doesn't mean that he wasn't a violent revolutionary in the past. In fact, as the text of Prairie Fire shows, Ayers was one of the most extreme extremists in American political history. And as the links given as the end of this essay will prove, Ayers is just as politically radical now as he was back then. He has never renounced the political views he professed in the 1960s and 1970s. The only difference is that now he no longer commits violence to achieve his goals. After his stint as the leader of the Weather Underground, he shifted to a different tactic: to spread his ideology under the aegis of academia. But the goal remains the same: to turn America into a communist nation. Ayers' contemporary writings contain many of the same ideas (and even the same phrases) found in Prairie Fire, just toned down to make them more palatable in polite society.

    But Where Is the Obama Connection?

This essay is only about William Ayers' past and present political views. It is not about the connection between Barack Obama and William Ayers. That issue has been covered (and continues to be covered) elsewhere in innumerable news reports and blog postings. Yet as evidence mounts of the extensive and long-standing connection between Obama and Ayers, making their association more and more difficult to deny, Obama's campaign and supporters have started shifting their strategy; Sure, they say, Obama may have had a connection with Ayers, but why is that so bad? Look at William Ayers now: He's a completely respectable man. What -- he protested against the Vietnam War? So did everyone. He's no extremist. I see these arguments made in countless blog posts, comment sections, and even news articles. This essay exists to stop that political escape route. There's no getting around it: William Ayers was a violent communist revolutionary bent on overthrowing the government and "seizing power" in the United States. The proof is on this page. And the only difference between the 1970s William Ayers and the William Ayers with whom Barack Obama has associated is that Ayers no longer uses violence to achieve his goals. But Ayers' underlying political world-view (i.e. communism) has remained the same.

For the record, and just to be complete, here are links documenting some of Obama's many connections to William Ayers:

    • Ayers and Obama worked together for years on a school reform program called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.

    • Ayers and Obama also served together on the board of the Woods Fund of Chicago, a separate charity organization.

    • Obama had his political coming-out party in William Ayers' home.

    Ayers mentions Obama by name in a book he wrote in 1997, and mentions that the two are very close neighbors.

    • Obama gave a short glowing review of that same Ayers book for the Chicago Tribune.

    • Obama and Ayers were both presenters together on a panel about juvenile justice (organized by Michelle Obama).

    • Both Obama and Ayers were close friends with the same person, Rashid Kalidi.

    • There are also several unverified rumors swirling around that have not been documented: That Ayers may have helped to write part (or all) of Obama's autobiography; that Obama and Ayers shared an office space together for three years, on the same floor of the same building in Chicago; and that Ayers and Obama may have known each other as far back as 1981.

    Authorship of Prairie Fire

    How do we know that William Ayers himself co-authored Prairie Fire? Doesn't the cover say it's by The Weather Underground as a group, and doesn't mention him specifically?

    Well, it's simple enough to prove. Because in the introduction, the four actual authors sign their names -- Bernardine Dohrn, Jeff Jones, Billy Ayers, and Celia Sojourn:

    … be constant change, that the only possibilities are victory or death.

    We have only begun. At this time, the unity and consolidation of anti-imperialist forces around a revolutionary program is an urgent and present strategic necessity. PRAIRIE FIRE is offered as a contribution to this unity of action and purpose. Now it is in your hands.

    Bernadine Dohrn
    Jeff Jones
    Billy Ayers
    Celia Sojourn

    For the Weather Underground

    Of course, in true communist spirit, earlier in the Introduction they mention that the book grew out of "study groups," "conversations" and "struggles" of the entire Weather Underground, but the four members listed above are the ones who actually sat down and wrote the manuscript. And of those four, "Billy" Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn were the most educated and literate, and were the acknowledged leaders of the group, so it's almost certain they did the bulk of the writing. (Especially considering, as I'll show below, the similarities between ideas in Prairie Fire and contemporary writings by William Ayers.)

    But that's not all. On his own blog, in his own resumé, Ayers lists himself as the author of Prairie Fire. Which is as conclusive as you can get.

    The Evidence

    The rest of this essay consists primarily of scanned pages taken directly from an actual physical copy of Prairie Fire printed in 1974. As you will notice, the production quality was fairly crude, with some pages being typewritten (possibly by William Ayers or Bernardine Dohrn themselves) with others typeset in varying fonts, and then printed somewhat inconsistently with different densities in different sections of the book. While this may have lent Prairie Fire an air of outlaw authenticity when it first was distributed, it looks rather odd and irregular in the era of computers and modern typography. I only mention this detail here to explain why the various scanned pages and quotes seen below look different from each other.

    PLEASE NOTE: For each of the full-size scanned pages displayed below, if you click on the image, your browser will open a new window showing a high-resolution version of the scan. I provide the hi-res scans as proof that this evidence is real, and in case anyone wants to inspect the text in more detail.

    The individual quoted lines scanned below are already high-resolution, so there is no need to click on them. In a few instances, the quoted sentences start or end in the middle of a line; in those cases, I only display the relevant quote in question; I do not include the text on the remaining portions of the lines.

    Underneath each scanned image is a transcription of some (or all) of the text shown, to make things easier for bloggers and journalists to copy and paste the sections which interest them.

    (The full book is over 150 pages long, so I necessarily can only present a small selection of pages here. But nearly every paragraph on every page throughout the entire manuscript is jam-packed with the exact same kind of communist/socialist/revolutionary verbiage you see here. If you want to see more, or if you simply want to confirm that all of this is true, I encourage you to seek out your own copy of Prairie Fire; a few copies can still be found in major libraries and through rare book dealers.)

    Below the scanned images is a final section providing quotes, links, videos and documentation proving that William Ayers maintained his political beliefs essentially unchanged throughout the '80s, '90s and 2000s, during which time he was accepted into the upper echelons of Chicago society, mingling and working with academics, activists and politicians -- including Barack Obama.

    Page 16: The Weather Underground's own list of their terrorist bombings and other crimes

    On page 16 of Prairie Fire, Ayers and his fellow co-authors brag about their numerous acts of domestic terrorism, and provide a handy list detailing not only each crime but in most cases the justification for each crime as well. Note an important detail: Most of the stated rationales for the Weather Underground's violent acts have nothing whatsoever to do with Vietnam. This disproves the ubiquitous media assertion that Ayers and the Weather Underground were "Vietnam War protesters."

    Also note Wikipedia's list of Weather Underground actions that provides additional details regarding their putative justifications, including bombing a bank "in solidarity with striking Puerto Rican cement workers" and bombing a federal office building due to "the need for women to take control of daycare, healthcare, birth control and other aspects of women's daily lives," among many others which make no mention of Vietnam. Also note that the bombings and other violent acts continued after Prairie Fire was published, and that all the Weather Underground "actions" in 1974 and '75 happened after the United States had already pulled its ground troops out of Vietnam and was no longer an active combatant in the ground war, which would have rendered any Vietnam War protests pretty much meaningless.

    Picture portraying a list of bombing the Weather Underground

    For the record, to prove beyond any doubt that this is real, click on the small image below to see a high-resolution scan of the entirety of page 16 in full context, including the edges of the book cover, the crease in the center of the book, and so on: PICTURE HERE.

    Page 10: The Start of the Chapter 1

    The main body of Prairie Fire begins on page 10, after various introductory pages. The following four scanned images are all short quotes taken from page 10. Below each quote is a transcription of the text. The final image of this section shows all these quotes in context in the book on page 10 itself.

    We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years.

    Here is the same quote repeated again, this time with additional context, in the form of the subsequent two sentences:

    We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years. We are deeply affected by the historic events of our time in the struggle against U.S. imperialism.

    Our intention is to disrupt the empire, to incapacitate it, to put pressure on the cracks, to make it hard to carry out its bloody functioning against the people of the world, to join the world struggle, to attack from the inside.


    The only path to the final defeat of imperialism and the building of socialism is revolutionary war.

    Revolutionary war will be complicated and protracted. It includes mass struggle and clandestine struggle, peaceful and violent, political and economic, cultural and military, where all forms are developed in harmony with the armed struggle.
    Without mass struggle there can be no revolution.
    Without armed struggle there can be no victory.

    The following scan shows the full two-page spread of pages 10 and 11. Page 11, as you can see, is a picture of Che Guevara. A full transciption of the text is below the image.


    The unique and fundamental condition of this time is the decline of U.S. imperialism. Our society is in social and economic crisis and assumptions about the U.S. are turned on their heads. These are hard conditions to live through. But they are favorable for the people and for revolution.
    These conditions of constant change demand the weapon of theory. Like people everywhere, we are analyzing how to bring to life the potential forces which can destroy U.S. imperialism.
    We are a guerrilla organization. We are communist women and men, underground in the United States for more than four years. We are deeply affected by the historic events of our time in the struggle against U.S. imperialism.
    Our intention is to disrupt the empire, to incapacitate it, to put pressure on the cracks, to make it hard to carry out its bloody functioning against the people of the world, to join the world struggle, to attack from the inside.
    Our intention is to engage the enemy, to wear away at him, to harass him, to isolate him, to expose every weakness, to pounce, to reveal his vulnerability.
    Our intention is to encourage the people, to provoke leaps in confidence and consciousness, to stir the imagination, to popularize power, to agitate, to organize, to join in every way possible the people's day-to-day struggles.
    Our intention is to forge an underground, a clandestine political organization engaged in every form of struggle, protected from the eyes and weapons of the state, a base against repression, to accumulate lessons, experience and constant practice, a base from which to attack.


    The only path to the final defeat of imperialism and the building of socialism is revolutionary war. Revolution is the most powerful resource of the people. To wait, to not prepare people for the fight, is to seriously mislead about what kind of fierce struggle lies ahead.
    Revolutionary war will be complicated and protracted. It includes mass struggle and clandestine struggle, peaceful and violent, political and economic, cultural and military, where all forms are developed in harmony with the armed struggle.
    Without mass struggle there can be no revolution.
    Without armed struggle there can be no victory.
    It will not be immediate, for the enemy is entrenched and intractable. It will require lengthy, deliberate political and armed

    The Introduction

    The following four scanned images are all short quotes taken from Prairie Fire's typewritten introduction. Below each quote is a transcription of the text. The final image of this section shows all these quotes in context in the full introduction to the book.

    May 9, 1974

    Sisters and brothers,

    Here is PRAIRIE FIRE, our political ideology - a strategy for anti-imperialism and revolution inside the imperial US.

    We undertook this analysis to explain the changes in US and world conditions since the Vietnam ceasefire and to evaluate the consequences of the Vietnamese victory.

    We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society.

    PRAIRIE FIRE is written to communist-minded revolutionaries, independent organizers and anti-imperialists

    The following scan shows the full two-page spread of the introduction, outlining the Weather Undergound's revolutionary communism, their goal of overthrowing the capitalist system, and ending with the names of the authors -- including "Billy" Ayers. Remember: Click on the image if you want to see a high-resolution version.

    May 9, 1974

    Sisters and brothers,

    Here is PRAIRIE FIRE, our political ideology - a strategy for anti-imperialism and revolution inside the imperial US. It comes out of our own practice of the last five years and reflects a diversity of experiences. This paper is not the product of one or two people, nor even a small handful of us. Rather PRAIRIE FIRE represents the politics and collective efforts of an organization. It has been the focus of our study groups and our political education. It has been chewed on and shaped in countless conversations, struggles and written pages. It has travelled around the country, growing, developing thru the attempt to understand the shape of world forces and the revolutionary possibilities before us. The paper was rewritten four times and collectively adopted as the political statement of the Weather Underground. The twelve-month process of writing PRAIRIE FIRE, squeezed between on-going work and practice and action, has now reached a kind of end-point. A cycle is done.

    We undertook this analysis to explain the changes in US and world conditions since the Vietnam ceasefire and to evaluate the consequences of the Vietnamese victory. We have come some distance in evaluating the political situation, the priorities for revolutionary work since we began this writing. Now many more revolutionaries will need to shape and change the paper. The politics cannot be realized unless and until the content of the program is activated in thousands of situations, among thousands of people in the coming period. PRAIRIE FIRE will be a growing thing.

    We hope the paper opens a dialectic among those in the mass and clandestine movements; we hope people will take PRAIRIE FIRE as seriously as we do, study the content and write and publish their views of the paper as well as their analysis of their own practice. We will respond as best we can.

    Our movement urgently needs a concrete analysis of the particular conditions of our time and place. We need strategy. We need to battle for a correct ideology and win people over. In this way we create the conditions for the development of a successful revolutionary movement and party. We need a revolutionary communist party in order to lead the struggle, give coherence and direction to the fight, seize power and build the new society. Getting from here to there is a process of coming together in a disciplined way around ideology and strategy, developing an analysis of our real conditions, mobilizing a base among the US people, building principled relationships to Third World struggle, and accumulating practice in struggle against US imperialism.

    PRAIRIE FIRE is written to communist-minded revolutionaries, independent organizers and anti-imperialists; those who carry the traditions and lessons of the struggles of the last decade, those who join in the struggles of today. PRAIRIE FIRE is written to all sisters and brothers who are engaged in armed struggle against the enemy. It is written to prisoners, women's groups, collectives, study groups, workers' organizing committees, communes, GI organizers, consciousness-raising groups, veterans, community groups and revolutionaries of all kinds; to all who will read, criticize and bring its content to life in practice. It is written as an argument against those who oppose action and hold back the struggle.

    PRAIRIE FIRE is based on a belief that the duty of a revolutionary is to make the revolution. This is not an abstraction. It means that revolutionaries must make a profound commitment to the future of humanity, apply our limited knowledge and experience to understand an ever-changing situation, organize the masses of people and build the fight. It means that struggle and risk and hard work and adversity will become our way of life, that the only certainty will be constant change, that the only possibilities are victory or death.

    We have only begun. At this time, the unity and consolidation of anti-imperialist forces around a revolutionary program is an urgent and pressing strategic necessity. PRAIRIE FIRE is offered as a contribution to this unity of action and purpose. Now it is in your hands.

    Bernardine Dohrn
    Jeff Jones
    Billy Ayers
    Celia Sojourn

    For the Weather Underground

    Dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan (among others)

    The following snippet is taken from the book's dedication page, and shows that the Weather Underground dedicated the book to Robert F. Kennedy's killer Sirhan Sirhan, among many other now-obscure '60s-era radicals, criminals and revolutionaries:

    Here's the two-page spread of the dedication page and copyright page in high-resolution, showing the full list of people to whom the book is dedicated:

    As an aside: Note how, on the copyright page, the authors state that the public is "free to utilize the material" in the book "for political debate and study." That is exactly how it is being used in this essay, though I think it's not quite the kind of debate that William Ayers originally had in mind! Also note that my reproduction of their material, as per their instructions, is true and accurate, and that I am not "profiteering" from it because this site has no ads and does not generate any income whatsoever.

    Page 40: Strategies for Revolution

    Page 40 of the manuscript is typical: It outlines the Weather Underground's strategies for overthrowing the United States. Among the many strategies are: eliminating the feeling of patriotism among the general public, destroying the government from within, and starting a mass insurrection among the lower classes. The three scanned quotes are followed by a full page 40 with them in context:

    Our job is to tap the discontent seething in many sectors of the population, to find allies everywhere people are hungry or angry, to mobilize poor and working people against imperialism.

    We have an urgent responsibility: to destroy imperialism from within in order to help free the world and ourselves from its grasp.

    Our final goal is the destruction of imperialism, the seizure of power, and the creation of socialism. Our strategy for this stage of the struggle is to organize the oppressed people of the imperial nation itself to join with the colonies in the attack on imperialism. This process of attacking and weakening imperialism involves the defeat of all kinds of national chauvinism and arrogance; this is a precondition to our fight for socialism.

    Page 41: The Definition of Socialism

    Ever since the word "socialism" was brought up in the campaign by "Joe the Plumber," to whom Obama said he intends to "spread the wealth around," there has been much discussion among pundits about what the word "socialism" really means, and whether or not it's a bad thing.

    Well, William Ayers had his own definition of socialism, which he spelled out on page 41 of Prairie Fire. Because it's relevant to current events, let's look at what the word "socialism" meant to left-wingers not too long ago:

    Socialism is the total opposite of capitalism/imperialism. It is the rejection of empire and white supremacy. Socialism is the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie, the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the eradication of the social system based on profit. Socialism means control of the productive forces for the good of the whole community instead of the few who live on hilltops and in mansions. Socialism means priorities based on human need instead of corporate greed. Socialism creates the conditions for a decent and creative quality of life for all.

    Here's page 41 in full:

    Page 13: Vietnam Is Only One Aspect of the Global Communist Revolution

    Page 13 discusses how the Vietnam War is only one component of the overall drive for worldwide communism. The following quotes speak for themselves:

    We made the choice to become a guerrilla organization at a time when the Vietnamese were fighting a heroic people's war, defeating half a million troops and the most technologically advanced military power. In our own hemisphere Che Guevara urged that we "create two, three, many Vietnams," to destroy U.S. imperialism by cutting it off in the Third World tentacle by tentacle, and opening another front within the U.S. itself. At home, the struggle and insurrection of the Black liberation movement heightened our commitment to fight alongside the determined enemies of the empire.
    This defined our international responsibility and our duty as white revolutionaries inside the oppressor nation. We are part of a wave of revolution sparked by the Black liberation struggle, by the death of Che in Bolivia in 1967, and by people's war in Vietnam.

    Revolution is a fight by the people for power. It is a changing of power in which existing social and economic relationships are turned upside down. It is a fight for who runs things, in particular, for control by the people of what we communists call the means of production

    Page 128: Views on Israel, the Palestinians and Mideast Oil

    The following quote is taken from page 128, from the portion of Prairie Fire having to do with the Middle East. I include it here to show the amazing consistency of the radical left-wing view of the area -- the issues and arguments remain almost unchanged from 1974 to today: ending Zionism, no "war for oil," stopping U.S. support for Israel, etc. Aside from a few current events details, this exact same text could have appeared in any contemporary left-wing essay about the Middle East. This shows that what once was a radical communist view has now become mainstream:

    [SlantRight Editor: Read ALL of page 128 to view the quote is referring to.]

    Ayers' Current Views

    At the beginning of this essay, I wrote that William Ayers is a communist. And while I certainly have shown that he was a communist, has he changed his stripes since 1974? Has he ever renounced the ideologies he embraced in Prairie Fire (and elsewhere)?

    In short: No. He still maintains the same belief systems. To this day, he sticks to the exact same phraseologies to describe his unchanged political philosophy.

    This section explores William Ayers' current beliefs about communist ideology. And why is this relevant? Because if he believed it in 1974, and still believes it in 2008, then he almost certainly continued to believe it in 1995-2006, the period during which Barack Obama had his associations with Ayers. There is no evidence whatsoever that Ayers went through some "right-wing phase" (which would have been totally out of character) nor had any diminuation of his political fervor. As far as anyone can tell, and according to Ayers himself, he has had a consistent and unchanged philosphy from the 1960s up until the present.

    What this means is that William Ayers was a communist when Barack Obama associated with him.

    So, let's get to the evidence about whether or not Ayers has changed his views.

    On April 12, 2002, Ayers said during an interview with a college radio station:

    I considered myself partly an anarchist then and consider myself partly an anarchist now. I mean I'm as much an anarchist as I am a Marxist.... I'm very open about what I think and nobody here is surprised by what I think.
    Is one of those regrets that I took extreme measures against the United States at a time of tremendous crisis? No it is not. I don't regret that. The people of the world are being exploited and oppressed and militarized by the great imperialist powers, led by the United States. That is the situation today in my view.
    And I'm not sorry about anything that I participated to try to end that war or against that government that was waging that war.

    As the video notes, Obama was working directly with Ayers within days of this interview being given -- and for years prior and afterward.

    Continuing in the same video, Ayers gave a TV interview in January of 2004 in which he hits on some of the exact same themes and uses some of the same phraseology he used in Prairie Fire:

    If we were being fair and open-minded, then if you looked around at the world today, you would say the greatest purveyor of of violence, as King said, is our own government. ...
    White supremacy and racism continues to be the dagger point of American democracy. I do believe that. I believed it then, I believe it now.

    In Prairie Fire, one can find many references to the United States government promoting violence, to white supremacy, and to racism. It's quite obvious nothing has changed in Ayers' philosophy.

    Next, let's turn to Bill Ayers' own personal blog, where he posts his own writings.

    On April 20, 2006, Ayers posted an open letter in which he wrote:

    We were anti-authoritarian, anti-orthodoxy, communist street fighters.
    I want to embrace...draft resisters, deserters, tax avoiders...
    If we know we hope to achieve a democratic and socialist world, a culture of life and love, our strategy and tactics are informed by filling that vision out on the ground...
    I went to Camp Casey in August precisely because I'm an agnostic about how and where the rebellion will break out, but I know I want to be there and I know it will break out...
    Opposing aggressive war is always urgent, but for revolutionaries we need to both be fully activated in the opposition...

    What more need be said?

    On November 7, 2006 Ayers posted this essay on his blog describing his visit to a conference in Hugo Chavez's Venezuela -- an essay which sounds like it could be a missing chapter from Prairie Fire, and which Ayers concludes by shouting "Viva Presidente Chavez!"

    And just a few months ago on June 28, 2008, Ayers describes himself in this posting on his blog as a "socialist" when it comes to economic policy.

    All of this is, of course, just the tip of the iceberg. To this day, nearly every word that Ayers utters and every sentence that he writes hews to the exact same communist line. You can easily find hundreds more examples yourself just by browsing through his blog or simply by Googling his name and searching for his writings and speeches, almost all of which still revolve around notions promulgated in Prairie Fire.

    William Ayers is a communist. By his own description. He was a communist then, he is a communist now, and he was a communist for the entire time that Barack Obama worked with him and was associated with him.

    Meanwhile, the North Vietnamese communists, whom William Ayers was glorifying and praising, themselves imprisoned and tortured for over five years a young pilot by the name of John McCain. Here's a newly discovered video of McCain taken in January of 1968 as he lay injured in a North Vietnamese prisoner-of-war hospital shortly after his capture. What's heart-rending about it is that he does not yet know that he will spend the next five years being tortured by William Ayers' comrades:

    John McCain POW

    Additional Links

    New York Times: Obama and '60s Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths

    In 2001, the New York Times reviewed Ayers' fictionalized "memoir" Fugitive Days and called it "maddeningly evasive... one of those books that tell by not telling."

    Excellent article by David Horowitz about Ayers; the source of the quote in which Ayers describes himself as "Guilty as hell. Free as a bird. America is a great country."

    Excerpt of video interview with Larry Grathwowl

    Undercover agent Larry Grathwohl, who had infiltrated and joined the Weather Underground, described their post-revolution governing plans for the United States in this video taken from the 1982 documentary "No Place to Hide." The Weather Underground openly discussed exterminating 25 million Americans who refused to be "re-educated" into communism.

    Here's a transcript of his interview:

    I bought up the subject of what's going to happen after we take over the government. We, we become responsible, then, for administrating, you know, 250 million people.

    And there was no answers. No one had given any thought to economics; how are you going to clothe and feed these people.

    The only thing that I could get, was that they expected that the Cubans and the North Vietnamese and Chinese and the Russians would all want to occupy different portions of the United States.

    They also believed that their immediate responsibility would be to protect against what they called the counter-revolution. And they felt that this counter-revolution could best be guarded against by creating and establishing re-education centers in the southwest, where we would take all the people who needed to be re-educated into the new way of thinking and teach them... how things were going to be.

    I asked, well, what's going to happen to those people that we can't re-educate; that are die-hard capitalists. And the reply was that they'd have to be eliminated. And when I pursued this further, they estimated that they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these re-education centers. And when I say eliminate, I mean kill. 25 million people.

    I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees from Columbia and other well known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.

    And they were dead serious."

    -- Larry Grathwohl, former member of the Weather Underground

    The ZombieTime Goods on BHO Lies about Ayers
    John R. Houk
    © October 25, 2008

    William Ayers' forgotten communist manifesto: Prairie Fire Home Page

Friday, October 24, 2008

Coulter: Radical Loon When Obama Was Only 47

Ann Coulter uses her classic wit to denounce the Mainstream Media for looking the other way concerning a huge list of bad apples in Barack Hussein Obama’s cart while making mountains out of mole hills in Governor Sarah Palin’s backyard.

Sick’em Coulter!

JRH 10/24/08

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Michelle Obama Tapes

African Press International (API) claims they have an audio recording of Michelle Obama intimidating the Norway based wire service for using Jerome Corsi as an anti-Obama source. WorldNetDaily (WND) has been following the API accusation concerning Michelle Obama; however API has not been forthcoming in releasing this tape. Thus WND is beginning to question that such an audio recording exists. WND implies even if there is a recording, the time frame in which API is dragging its feet suggests a tampered tape is being fabricated to embarrass BHO.

If it is a hoax being fabricated by API, it is too bad. It was be great to smear some muck from BHO’s wife on the BHO Campaign. It is too bad because
the BHO campaign and surrogates have had NO compunction in making up lies and twisting facts about Governor Sarah Palin. (Even the Brits recognize there is a Leftist campaign to smear Governor Palin.)

JRH 10/23/08

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

We The People

We the People
(Political Colombo Mystery Chain E-Mail Humor)

Ah . . . Sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir. . .

Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, Sir. Um . . . I know you're busy, and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and -- ah -- I hate to bother you Sir. I will only take a minute. Ok, Sir?

See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering, Sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.

Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says boy she wishes she had digs like this you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!

Oh, sorry Sir. I didn't mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island Sir? No? I didn't think so.

Well, listen, anyway, I can't seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be 'Not released' or 'Not available.' I'm sure it's just an oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are -- I -- I have them written down here somewhere -- oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I'll just read it to you.

Could you please help me find these things Sir?

    1. Occidental College records -- Not released

    2. Columbia College records -- Not released

    3. Columbia Thesis paper -- 'Not available'

    4. Harvard College records -- Not released

    5. Selective Service Registration -- Not released

    6. Medical records -- Not released

    7. Illinois State Senate schedule -- Not available

    8. Your Illinois State Senate records -- Not available

    9. Law practice client list -- Not released

    10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate -- Not released

    11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth -- Not released

    12. Record of your baptism -- Not available

Oh and one more thing Senator, I can't seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago. Can you explain that to me Sir?

Oh but, hey -- listen! I know you're busy! If this is too much for you right now -- I mean -- tell you what. I'll come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, You know? I mean, I know you're busy. I'll just let myself out. I'll be back tomorrow. And maybe the day after. . .

What's that Senator? Who wants to know these things?

We the People of the United States of America. You know, the ones that vote...

JRH 10/22/08

"Sarah's a Fighter"

Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Barack Hussein Obama. BHO whole political career is based on the Chicago good 'ole boy Leftist politics of the Democratic Party. Palin represents true change in standing up to both big oil and to Republicans of her own Party.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

The Third Jihad – The Documentary

Below is an excerpt from an email from, promoting the feature Movie Documentary of the same name.

JRH 10/21/08


The Third Jihad is a documentary whose goal is to alert, educate and mobilize Americans about the danger radical Islam poses to the United States and to Western civilization as a whole. The film spotlights radical Islam's war against free societies, its violent, anti-democratic agenda as well as its systematic human and civil rights abuses against women, blacks, homosexuals, Christians and moderate Muslims.

The Third Jihad focuses on radical Islam's campaign to dominate America and the West, and the ramifications of such a reality on our day-to-day lives. It underscores the importance of the American people joining together against radical Islam, which if not defeated, will continue to threaten our lives and values until they are destroyed completely.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Obama Associations

Barack Hussein Obama has pooh-poohed and deflected his past associations as irrelevant. Of course that is mere Leftist double-speak for "don't look into my life; it might diminish your outlook of the new messiah." NOW one of those horrible associations is Michelle Obama.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Muhammad and Hafsa

Well I wonder how long YouTube will allow this exposé on Mohammedan morality to remain up.

The of Quranic verses demonstrates how carnal the so-called
religion of peace is.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Michelle Obama Recorded Intimidating API?

The African Press International (API) alleges that Michelle Obama phoned them to complain they were using a racist source in their coverage of the American election campaign for President. That accused racist is Jerome Corsi who wrote a controversial exposé on Barack Hussein Obama.

The API says it recorded the Michelle Obama conversation. Evidently the contents of the recording are hot because the Obama Campaign denies it ever took place. The API says it is reluctant to release the recording to the public until their legal team examines any potential legal blow back on API.

Unless the API releases the recording it is all valueless speculation of she said/he said.
WorldNetDaily believes if the recording is released, it would be a game ender for the Obama Campaign. Personally I don’t know about that. The Messianic proportions that Barack Hussein Obama has acquired among his supporters will undoubtedly make the revealing of truth as irrelevant. Yet the few Independents not affected by BHO’s political Messianism may switch to McCain. The question would be: Is that enough to sway the election to McCain’s favor.

At any rate: no recording means there is no controversy for Barack and Michelle Obama.

JRH 10/17/08

Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Left is Way more Consumed with Hate than the Right

The Leftist pro-BHO Mainstream Media (MSM) has had a field day when a handful of angry pro-right questioners demonstrated their repugnance for Barack Hussein Obama. If you were so unfortunate to view some of these questioners at John McCain rallies you will notice the anger was presented in such a way that there was no appearance of flipping out. In other words it was a “be angry and sin not” type of angry more than the crazed dementia the MSM would have their readers believe.

Certainly the questioning comments were out of order for a public forum. For example I saw one
angry gal say that Barack Hussein Obama was not an African-American but an Arab. The lady was immediately dubbed a Right Wing racist hater.

The odd thing is
there may be some truth to her statement even though it was presented in a racist light. And frankly whether BHO is an African-American or an Arab-American is truly irrelevant. What should be relevant to Americans is BHO’s Leftist and anti-Christian moral stands he has taken. Americans should be concerned with BHO’s past associations in that he has gone out of his way to lie or cover-up the truth about those past associations. That makes BHO a liar. A liar is a person YOU should not trust.

I find it fascinating the MSM reports on out of place restrained anger as I have mentioned above but has not reported on the hysterical rabid anger of Leftists toward the Right complete with the middle finger and ghoulish profanity spilling forth from Leftist tongues about President Bush, McCain/Palin and the Right in general. I mean it makes the lady calling BHO an Arab look like a saint.

The blogger JudgeBob has been following this MSM and Leftist hypocrisy. JudgeBob has a number of videos to prove his point the MSM and the Left are a bunch of thugs more interested in squelching the free speech opinion of their opposition than acting like mature Americans that can make their position felt in a less polarizing (which BHO says he stands for) like voting or writing a reasoned letter to an MSM editor.

JRH 10/16/08

Coulter: Eighty-Four Percent Say They'd Never Lie To A Pollster

Ann Coulter questions the reliability of polls when the Dems poll a lead. I for one pray she is correct for the pollsters are painting a dark picture about McCain. Leftist Dems are jumping on that poll analysis train claiming victory even before the November 4 election.

If Coulter is correct it is evidence of Mainstream collusion to amplify pro-BHO propaganda to push McCain aside.

JRH 10/16/08

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

The Reid-Pelosi-Obama (RePO) Team Vs. The Rest of America

Newt Gingrich takes on the Barack Hussein Obama and the Democratic Party lie that the present economic crisis is totally the blame of the Republicans and Bush Administration ineptitude in managing our economy.

The only true thing in blaming the Republicans for the current economic crisis is that the Bush Administration failed to recognize the bad loans being made and not aggressively bring it to the public to aid the Republican Party in its attempt to reform the lending practices that has tipped the dominoes to a full blown economic crisis.

JRH 10-15-08