Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Slavery, Terrorism and Islam

Here is an examination of how violent Islam IS in ratio to its population in a nation. Dr. Hammond’s brings clarity to the myth of moderate Mohammedanism.

JRH 4/30/08

Why We Left Islam

Why We Left Islam” is a book written by ex-Muslims sharing the truth of Islamic brutality wherever Islam/Mohammedanism is the predominant social structure. Of course this would focus on Middle East however there are enclaves Mohammedanism in Europe and America where Muslims dominate neighborhoods or cities; thus this would be true there as well.

That being said here is a review, a shameless promotion and an exposing of the Left and so-called Moderate Mohammedan organization by
WorldNetDaily which I received via email.

Just to make a point: I say “shameless” because WND is the publisher and marketer of “Why We Left Islam.” I do not say shameless because the book is inaccurate. My God people experienced brutality or witnessed brutality and made a choice to be an ex-Muslim. In Mohammedan circles this is a brave choice. Forsaking Mohammedanism amongst the Mohammedan dominated is an offense worthy of death according to the death cult.

Here is
WND’s marketing of “Why We Left Islam:”

JRH 4/30/08

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

God Bless America

If you are a true American you will be BLESSED!

If you are a Left Winger or an Islamist, you will cringe at God's door.

What’s Your Take on Black Liberation Theology?

If you are a Republican you have to love the self-destruction that occurring in the Democratic Party.

In case you have not been reading or watching the news, Jeremiah – Whitey oppresses Blackie – Wright has been in the news
mouthing off racism against White people and further embarrassing his prodigy Barack Hussein Obama in the process.

So what is about Jeremiah Wright that works his point of view of society in America? It is the ideology of Black Liberation Theology.

What is “Black Liberation Theology?”

Liberation Theology is an attempt to interpret Scripture through the plight of the poor. It is largely a humanistic doctrine. It started in South America in the turbulent 1950's when Marxism was making great gains among the poor because of its emphasis on the redistribution of wealth, allowing poor peasants to share in the wealth of the colonial elite and thus upgrade their economic status in life.

Liberation Theology has moved from the poor peasants in South America to the poor blacks in America. We now have Black Liberation Theology being preached in the black community. It is the same Marxist, revolutionary, humanistic philosophy found in South American Liberation Theology and has no more claim for a scriptural basis than the South American model has. False doctrine is still false, no matter how it is dressed up or what fancy name is attached to it. In the same way that revolutionary fervor was stirred up in South America, Liberation Theology is now trying to stir up revolutionary fervor among Blacks in America. If the church in America recognizes the falseness of Black Liberation Theology as the Catholic Church did in the South American model, Black Liberation Theology will suffer the same fate that the South America Liberation Theology did, namely it will be seen to be the false doctrine of a humanist viewpoint dressed up in theological terms. (Excerpts from

This is the definition I favor; however I am a Caucasian so let’s look at a pro-Black Liberation Theology definition.

The Rev. James Cone is the founder of black liberation theology. In an interview with Terry Gross, Cone explains the movement, which has roots in 1960s civil-rights activism and draws inspiration from both the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, as "mainly a theology that sees God as concerned with the poor and the weak."

Cone explains that at the core of black liberation theology is an effort — in a white-dominated society, in which black has been defined as evil — to make the gospel relevant to the life and struggles of American blacks, and to help black people learn to love themselves. It's an attempt, he says "to teach people how to be both unapologetically black and Christian at the same time." (Excerpts from
NPR March 31, 2008)

Note the pro-Black Liberation Theology definition leaves out any references to humanism or Marxism in any form of specificity. Nonetheless look at words that should send up red flags in your brain: Inspired by a combination of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X; concern for the poor and weak; white-dominated society; help Black people to “love themselves.”

The pro definition has all the words that are endearing to Secular Humanists, Communists and Black Power (racist revolutionists) disguised in the wrapping paper of Christianity. In other words Black Liberation Theology is a bill of goods being sold to African-Americans should be stamped
Buyer Beware.

Ed Decker’s
Saints Alive website has an April E-newsletter of which one article deals with Black Liberation Theology by Anthony B. Bradley. It is a good read.


Monday, April 28, 2008

Islamofascism in Action

Once again thanks to Act! For America more of the Islamist agenda is being exposed. Brigitte Gabriel’s grass roots organization has shown a link that is a six part YouTube rebroadcast of a UK television station’s infiltration of a Mosque in Britain demonstrating that Mohammedans lie (they call it taqiyya or various spellings). Mohammedan organizations in the West will tell the public and the government they are an interfaith or Muslim rights group dedicated to protecting the rights of Muslim and to being moderate good citizens of the nation they live in. It is all a lie!

Islamists have a two pronged attack on Western Culture (Wake-up Americans): the use of terrorism to create fear and
Fifth Column infiltration to infest Western Culture from within utilizing Freedom and Liberty as a weapon against the West.

The Six Part YouTube videos of the UK television station’s exposé shows what really goes on in Islamofascist Mosques. My fellow Americans, if it is happening in the United Kingdom be assured the same heinous agenda to bring down the American Way and thus our beloved Constitutional Freedoms is hideously alive in America.


Undercover Reporter in United Kingdom Films Islamofascism in Action !!

Act! For America
Email Sent: April 28, 2008 3:39:33 PM

Over a year ago, a United Kingdom television station dispatched a reporter to go undercover into mosques in the UK.

In a series of blockbuster video reports that have been posted on YouTube, viewers get to see for themselves what Brigitte Gabriel and others have been warning about for years.

In just the first installment, you will see imams proclaiming:

“Allah has created the woman deficient…If she doesn’t wear the hijab, we hit her.”

“You have to live like a state within a state until you take over.”

“The pinnacle, the crest, the summit of Islam, is jihad.”

In that same installment you will see how a large Muslim organization in the UK has a “special” chat room for communication not meant for non-Muslims to see.

You will see how imams despise non-believers and call for jihad against them.

But what is most relevant for us in America, is that the Saudi Arabian religious establishment that provides the materials and the teaching that is going on inside these British mosques also provides the materials and the teaching for many – if not most – mosques here in the United States.

So when you click on the link below to view these undercover videos, remind yourself that this is what is happening in mosques right here in America — perhaps in your community, and even right down the street from you!

If you aren’t able to see these videos on your computer, find someone who can.

Words alone do not do justice to the reality of the threat we are facing. Please click on the link above, view one or more of the videos, and then forward this email to everyone you know.

ACT for America

P.O. Box 6884 Virginia Beach, VA 23456

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

CAIR admits it erred on Farah statement

Now I know this WorldNetDaily article publicizing the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) previous accusation berating Douglas Farah and his newest book “Why We Left Islam” is basically a blatant promotion by WND for the book. Nonetheless it is amusing that CAIR did issue a retraction for its accusations against Farah and WND.

I am guessing the apology and retraction was out of the fear of a civil suit.
Anti-CAIR has shown how to fight CAIR civil suits: ask for discovery of internal affairs (which must be provided). This is how Anti-CAIR forced CAIR to leave them alone. Obviously a legal inspection regarding discovery of the civil complaint could expose the true nature of CAIR’s agenda to the American public. I speculate most Americans would find CAIR’s activities un-American when placed into the public microscope.

Go Farah!

JRH 4/26/08

Friday, April 25, 2008

The Muslim Brotherhood and Voting

God bless Act! For America! I am so grateful I signed up to be on their email list. Act! For America is awesome in delivering educational articles of Islamism and Mohammedanism. In case you did not know it, Act! For America is also making a huge effort at grassroots education of the wickedness of Islamism, which by the way most of the Mohammedan-America organizations in the USA are dominated by that political ideology.

Act! For America has sent me an illuminating article by Douglas Farah which concerns the Islamist Fifth Column that is attempting to use Democracy as a vehicle to bring the West and establish intolerant Mohammedanism and Sharia Law.

JRH 4/25/08

Sent: April 25, 2008 12:25:17 PM
Act! For America Email Introduction:

    The eye-opening commentary below illustrates why a government focus on terrorism to the exclusion of “Cultural Jihad” is foolish and dangerous. It illustrates why the purveyors of political correctness, who go to great lengths to tolerate Islamic intolerance, are helping to plant the seeds of our own destruction. Lastly, it illustrates why it is so important that concerned, informed citizens in democratic societies like ours rise up in a unified, organized voice within the civic and political process – before we lose the right to express that voice.


The Muslim Brotherhood and Voting

Douglas Farah
April 24, 2008
Family Security Matters

If one wants to get a more realistic picture of how the Muslim Brotherhood and its international legacy organizations view voting and the democratic process than the usual platitudes of their public discourse, it is well worth reading the
Guide to Voting in Islam, posted by the Muslim Association of Britain.

This document and commentary on its content was first posted on the
Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, available for a free subscription.

Because in political Islam there is no difference between the state and religion, voting itself becomes, as one British Imam is quoted in the document as saying, a form of Jihad:

I consider Muslim political participation, especially in a non-Muslim country, as a form of jihad. This is our country and it would be foolish not to participate in the political processes which eventually shape our future and that of Islam. I support marching in the streets to raise awareness about certain issues. However, if we really want to change the status-quo then we have to influence those who walk the corridors of power. Muslims need not only to vote but put forward Muslim candidates in all the mainstream and serious independent parties. We need to be represented or be present at the tables around which policies are discussed, made and agreed.

The Guide to Voting offers grudging support for alliances with non-Muslims if the alliance is for the good of the Muslim population. Totally absent is the consideration of what is good for the country in which the Muslim individual is voting. This is made explicitly clear in a quote by Abdur Raheem Green, Dawah Administrator of the Central Mosque of London included in the Guide:

It has long been my position that any type of participation in democracy is a type of approval of that system. I have no doubt that democracy is antithetical to Islam. However, having read and listened to the sayings of many scholars on this issue, and being faced with the reality of a growing Muslim population here in the UK, who for all intents and purposes consider this their home, it has become clear to me that we must participate in every aspect of society as much as possible to ensure our rights and continued existence and well being in this society. This participation most certainly includes voting for whichever party or candidate best serves the needs and interests of the UK and indeed world wide Muslim population. This does not mean approval or acceptance of the ideal of secular democracy, but the intention is to use the means and avenues available to benefit Muslims and the communities we reside in.

That seems pretty straightforward to me. There is not a commitment to the fundamental concept of freedom and multi-party democracy. There is solely a commitment to establishing an Islamic state, and if that can be advanced through participating in elections, then so be it.

This ties in with the calls of the MB legacy groups in the United States to get Sen. John McCain
stop using the adjective Islamic to describe radical Islamist terrorists.

The charge is led by Muneer Fareed of ISNA, who says that “I think this is just criminality, fair and square. We should just call them criminals. You want to call them terrorist criminals, fine. But adding the word ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islamic’ certainly doesn’t help our cause as Americans.”

But therein lies the rub, because it is clear from the Guide, and many other writings, that the MB’s primary loyalty is not to whatever country they live in, but to the establishment of an Islamist state. And the terrorists define themselves as acting on behalf of Islam, and embrace the word.

So on whose behalf is Fareed and ISNA speaking? One must always ask that when dealing with the MB.
___________________________ Contributing Editor Douglas Farah is an award-winning investigative journalist, author of "Blood From Stones: The Secret Financial Network of Terror", and Senior Fellow in Financial Investigations and Transparency at the International Assessment and Strategy Center. He blogs on the Counterterrorism Blog and also at
read full author bio here

Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of The Family Security Foundation, Inc.

© 2003-2007 [sic] All Rights Reserved.

Bushtolike Pilon: Low Brow Intellect

A Comment left by “Bushtolike Pilon” denigrated the United States of America at this blogspot post: “Al-Sadr may restart full-scale fight against US in Iraq.” I have posted this same title on most of the social blogs I am a member of as well.

This is what Bushtolike Pilon wrote:

The greatest worldwide thief is the blue eyed devil! Every where he goes there is only destruction, mayhem and death. Wake up buddy who is more blood thirsty for oil? The answer is the west and Usa!! You are just as fucking moron talking shit through your fat blue eyed ass.

Have fun for now as the BIG DRAGON China will soon kick your fat crap talking butt into chowmein. Have fun!!!
Fri Apr 25, 02:58:00 AM 2008

The person has to be a Lefty or a Muslim-America for the person broadcast the intellect of the low brow vulgar slang that is often used by the American Left. Obviously the person chose epithets rather than cogitative thinking to refute my opinion.

Here is my comment response:

There may indeed by a show down between America and China over oil. God forbid if China wins, then the Middle East would truly understand the brutality of an atheistic nation.

Mohammedans have their eye on Israel, USA and the West; however it is the largest persecutor of all religions that makes torture done by Mohammedans look like a picnic. Under Mao tse Tung (or which ever way you choose to write his name), China slaughtered over 35 MILLION people to re-educate and eradicate religion. A program still continued to this day against all religions and particularly focused on Christians, Buddhists (Tibet) and Mohammedans.

If you are a Mohammedan, you are a dumb ass to think China will not slaughter Mohammedans if they win such a confrontation with America. If you are a Communist, you are a dumb ass for supporting such a murderous government.

In fact
look at list of genocides and note that America is not even on the list; however the rogue governments of the Middle East main suppliers of weapons are number one and two.

Oil is indeed an economic weapon used as an excuse for National Interests of Super Powers and imposing global intolerance by third rate Mohammedan nations that have oil under their ground.

You know the third rate power nations will not win an oil war. You had better hope America wins if such a war arises. We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them.

Who did you say was blood thirsty for Oil?
Fri Apr 25, 01:01:00 PM 2008

As you can tell, I can be totally irritated at people that use profanity to delusionally make a point. The only point that is made that way is proof the Conservative-Christian path is the way to go for morality and National Defense of the American way of life.

UPDATE: I probably won’t continue to follow up anymore; however the commenter has left a similar comment this time under the name “anonymous.” I was not sure previously whether the person was a Marxist/Leftist or a Mohammedan. I now convinced the person is a Mohammedan.

I will first post the Mohammedan drivel followed immediately by my response:

Anonymous said...

Your list is written by the Usa itselt and a big lie. Vietnam is the American genocide and before that the genocide of the american indians who are still suffering under the invaders. Dont fool yourself we are not that dumb.

"We re-build those we defeat, not slaughter them."The lie of millennium You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc.
Fri Apr 25, 01:48:00 PM 2008

My response:

Theway2k said...

Anonymous now I know you are a moron. That list was compiled NOT by the US Government but by one of the Left Wing universities in America. In fact I'd say Berkley is so deluded in its Leftism that they support Islamofascist Mohammedans over America in the Global War on Terror.

[Not in the original comment: It is true the Native Americans were mistreated horribly in history by the American Government as it expanded from the East Coast to the West Coast; however the Native Americans not only have full citizenship, freedom and liberty today but the Federal American Government provides extra perks and in some cases allow laws to occur that supersedes State and Local Government (revenue via the gambling industry as one example).

How many Church Bells ring in Mohammedan dominated land? What kind of equal rights under the law do Christian, Jews and non-Muslims have under the Mohammedan rule of law (in many cases where
Medieval Sharia Law is the dominant foundation)?

Yes that is correct: ZIP, ZERO, NADA AND NOTHING.]

You said: "You steal,kill,rape,spread diseases,fornication,pornography,alcohol etc."

That is the perfect description of a Mohammedan except maybe the alcohol (which is replaced by smoking drugs).

So Wake-Up America! This is the kind of deluded lies that Middle Eastern Mohammedans or American-Islamist Mohammedans truly believe. Even revisionist Leftist Academics disagree with the Mohammedan mind!
Fri Apr 25, 03:52:00 PM 2008

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Al-Sadr may restart full-scale fight against US in Iraq

Well so much for the Badar family dealing Muqtada al-Sadr privately as a family matter. Al-Sadr apparently is gaining confidence from rogue Iran that wishes to carve out a Middle Eastern hegemonic power base in the Middle East.

The Yahoo News source I just read implied al-Sadr is prepared to engage the U.S. military on a full scale basis in order to carve out his own Iraqi mini-state. Let’s see, what that State be called? Perhaps it would be called the Mahdi Republic or perhaps al-Sadr would just proclaim al-Sadr’s fiefdom a new part of the Shi’ite Islamofascist Republic of Iran.

Hello, its another play for oil power in the Middle East. It is somewhat like Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait to usurp oil
for more money to rebuild Iraq after Iraq-Iran War ceased.

This could be another move on the chess board of war preparations between Iran and America: Patraeus was
elevated to CentCom Commander so Iran elicits pressure from client terrorist al-Sadr.

JRH 4/24/08

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Patraeus to Command CentCom

General David Patraeus is being promoted from Baghdad Command to Central Command in the Middle East.

This is happening after Admiral Fallon abruptly resigned the CentCom position in March over strategy disagreement with the Bush Administration. Fa
llon opposed “The Surge” while Bush and Patraeus agreed it was a need
. Patraeus obviously won out and it looks like he is taking the old bosses job.

With “The Surge” being way more successful than its opponents could ever have imagined; speculation must begin to arise as to the position of CentCom Commander for Patraeus. This is so particularly because of all the
saber rattling from Iran and the promise of retaliation even from Democratic candidate Hillary.

Iran is supplying terrorist enemies of America and America’s ally Israel. Is the Bush Administration planning some kind of strike on Iran? It is just something to think about.

JRH 4/23/08

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Response to Maryam

Ali Sina socks it to a Mohammedan gal by attempting to repudiate Sina’s assertion “Muhammad Kadab” was a false prophet that fabricated an ideology and tagged it with the moniker of religion.

Go get’em Ali.

JRH 4/22/08

Shilling for Sharia at Harvard

You would think an Ivy League Western minded (even if Left oriented) University like Harvard would recognize the evils of Sharia Law and the wholly incompatibility that Mohammedan aspect of the rule of law has with the rule of law in the more evolved Western tradition.

I am stunned that Harvard Law School Professor
Noah Feldman is promoting Sharia Law as a viable rule of law in the West. It is even more stunning that Professor Feldman has Jewish roots in his lineage. I am uncertain if a possessor of Jewish heritage has embraced the medieval brutality of Professor Feldman is a practicing Jew (Orthodox – doubtful, Conservative or Reformed) or one of many secularist (sometimes atheist) Left leaning Jews that deny their faith but embrace their Jewish heritage. Perhaps Professor Feldman has renounced Judaism and Jewishness altogether in his personal belief system. But what is stunning is that as Westerner and Sharia Law.

Read this review (and criticism) of a Feldman lecture of such a position taken:

JRH 4/22/08

Monday, April 21, 2008

Muslim Comments Prosecuted As Racist

Well at least one French gal (former sex kitten) comprehends the danger of Islam running over Western Culture AND she is not afraid of the consequences of the Left Wing accusations of “Hate Crime.”

JRH 4/21/08

Barack and Barack Supporting Google both Anti-Christian?

Erick Erickson of has sent an e-list email encouraging his readers to protest to Congress about Larry Lessig of Google and Barack Obama.

His complaint is threefold.

    1. Larry Lessig is pro-Net Neutrality.
    2. Larry Lessig is virulently anti-Christian and moves Google in that direction.
    3. Lessig is a huge political supporter of Obama; thus Obama has another guilt by association by allowing Lessig’s support of his campaign.

I am not sure if I understand Erickson’s anger about Lessig being for Net Neutrality. Net Neutrality is like the sun, it shines its light on the good and evil at the same time. Net Neutrality certainly allows the evil in this world to exploit a form of communication; however Net Neutrality offers the same exact ability for good to be on the Internet.

I am guessing Erickson’s ire is because Google under Lessig’s direction may be guilty of not allowing pro-Christian websites to be accessed via the Google search engine. If the allegation is true (and I don’t doubt that it is), then Lessig’s defense of Net Neutrality is Leftist hypocrisy. In essence Lessig is promoting Leftwing pro-Mohammedan websites and ridiculing Christ and Christian websites as well as definitely NOT providing neutrality for all users of the Google search engine.

This is a revelation that saddens me. I like using the Google search engine. Unfortunately I am finding out when I place a search for some Christian specific information, Google may be biased as a guide.

Then there is Barack Obama. Obama openly receives support from anti-Christian Lessig. Could this further expose light on Obama’s other associations with Nation of Islam racist Louis Farrakhan and Black Supremacist Christian Jeremiah Wright?

Couple this with Obama’s recent denigration of Pennsylvania rural dwellers (ergo all rural dwellers) as ignorant gun-toting individuals that rely on religion for solace on and comfort and what do you have a picture of?

It is a picture of an anti-Christian candidate running for the Democratic nomination for President.

Obama Adviser Denigrates Jesus. Don't let him get away with it. Email Alert
Erick Erickson
April 21, 2008 7:04:14 AM

    ACTION ITEM: Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee at 202-224-5115 and protest Larry Lessig and Google denigrating Christ while Google censors Christians online. Details below.

A friend and adviser to Barack Obama, Larry Lessig, is going to testify before Congress on Tuesday to advocate for "net neutrality," a position strongly supported by Google,Inc.

Google, recently allowed Larry Lessig to talk to Google employees. During his talk, Lessig showed a video of Jesus, depicted as gay and wearing a diaper singing the song "I Will Survivor" until Christ is run over by a bus. You can see for yourself

Lessig told Google's employees, "This is a little bit touchy to some people. I don't get it, so just chill."

Google and Lessig believe that intellectual property rights should be curtailed and internet providers should be forced to allow anyone and everyone to use their networks.

While Google is pushing net neutrality and blaspheming Christ, Google is also censoring Christians online. As I document
here, Google has censored a pro-life group online. Google has also been sued for anti-Christian discrimination in the United Kingdom.

Of course, while Google is happy to censor Christians while denigrating Christ, Google has gone out of its way to censor content that might offend muslims.

Google should have no right to demand open access to your internet while censoring and denigrating Christians on its network. And the Senate should not give Larry Lessig a platform to advocate Google's position while Google behaves in that manner.

Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee and tell them you find it disgraceful that Google could advocate an open internet while censoring Christians and laughing while Larry Lessig denigrates Christ. The number is 202-224-5115.

Also, please forward this to your friends. Have your friends join this list. We should not let the left get away with denigrating Christ and sending those who do to Congress to advocate for companies that routinely censor Christians.

Together, we can stop this.

All the best,
Erick Erickson Editor,

Forward This Email to a Friend

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Is it Time for a 28th Amendment?

Hans Gruen has posted a proposed version of a fictional 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The theme of Gruen’s Amendment is to declare Islam (I prefer Mohammedanism) NOT a religion and instead a political ideology.

Frankly I agree with Gruen’s assessment (particularly radical Islamism); however I fear the American public is not convinced Mohammedanism is more a political ideology than a religion.

One of Gruen’s commenters noted that a call for an Amendment to outlaw Mohammedanism has been thought upon already. There is even a
petition going around the Internet to outlaw Mohammedanism. I am going to seek out and sign this petition; however I am fairly certain (at this point) that the lack of Jihad education in America will find this Amendment repugnant.

A grassroots movement in America needs to be started (something like Gabriel's -
Act! For America - has began) to spread the word about the ideology of Mohammedanism as opposed to the religious practice of Mohammedanism.

I think a better possibility is to enact an Amendment to the Constitution declaring America a nation with a Judeo-Christian heritage without establishing any particular Jewish sect (Orthodox, Conservative or Reformed) or Christian Denominations (Variations of Protestantism, Catholicism, Eastern Orthodox etc.) as a State religion.

This would simultaneously deal with Secular Humanism war on Christianity and radical Islam.


Out of Africa and Back Again. A Taste of Militant Islam.

Brigitte Gabriel has sent out a communication to her Act! For America email list. Gabriel introduces a letter she received to permission to share. The letter is the description of the horrors of Islamofascism demonstrating that the ideology affecting Mohammedanism has imputed a religion of hate and not peace as so many deluded Leftists, Appeasers and well meaning (and some not so well meaning) Muslims have attempted to dupe the West into believing.

JRH 4/20/08

Out of Africa and Back Again. A Taste of Militant Islam.

By Deborah Simon
Intro By: Brigitte Gabriel
Email Sent: April 19, 2008 9:11:17 PM
Act! For America

Personal experience is a powerful motivator for future action. As those of you who have read my book Because They Hate know, my experience of losing my country (Lebanon) to the terror of militant Islam powerfully motivates me to warn America to take action.

One of our ACT! for America chapter leaders recently shared with us a little of her personal experience with militant Islam. In it, she asks the very same question I asked my mother as we sat in our bomb shelter: “Why do they hate us?”

Her story is another reminder to all of us what we are up against. I applaud her courage and her devotion to the America we love. I applaud her for choosing to fight instead of running away in fear. She is an inspiration to every one of us!

With her permission it is my honor and privilege to share with you her story. (Please note all names have been changed).

Brigitte Gabriel

Out of Africa and Back Again. A Taste of Militant Islam.

My name is Deborah Simon. I am an American.

In 1967 when I was 5 years old my family was evacuated out of Tripoli, Libya, North Africa during the political unrest that followed the Six-Day Arab-Israeli War.

Forty years later Islamofascism has followed me home to my own country, America. I am not running again! It is time to fight and I will not stop until we win!

Here is my story.

I was born in West Germany. My father was in the American Air Force and stationed there where he met my mother, an immigrant from Prussia. She spoke Hebrew and German. Her mother was Jewish. My sister Erika and I spoke German and English.

Our first tour was to Tripoli, Libya, North Africa in 1967. The very city, state and country where in 1986 President Reagan launched an air strike against Muammar Qaddafi in retaliation for his numerous terrorist acts.

My earliest memories of North Africa were beautiful Tripoli, Libya, the Mediterranean Sea where I learned to swim, the camel rides, the souks (village markets) where we loved to buy exotic foods and trinkets and home furnishings. And the fairs held by the military base on the beach by the sea where all were welcome.

We lived outside the base and we loved the drive along the Mediterranean Sea every day to the school on Wheelus Air Force Base.

Then came the Arab-Israeli Six-day war in 1967. It brought immediate anti-American sentiment throughout Libya and this brought on not so fond memories -- all Libyan Jews were forced to leave the country.

I remember once my sister Erika and I walking downtown with my mother. Muslims riding by on their bicycles began spitting at us and hitting my mother so hard it almost knocked her down. Her “crime”? She was 'Western' and was wearing a dress with no sleeves. I will never forget how afraid we all were, all of us crying and asking “why do they hate us?”

Out of fear we stayed out of sight after that. No more visiting the souks that I loved so much or going to the Mediterranean Sea.

Soon after that the U.S. embassy in Libya was attacked, and all American families were strongly urged to evacuate. My father called to tell my mother to get to the airport on Wheelus Air Force Base. He told my mother that it was urgent to leave right away, that we were being evacuated and not to pack anything except to grab his attaché case of important papers. We begged our mother to let us bring our “dollies” but we were told we could bring nothing. My sister and I hid our 'dollies' under our beds to keep them safe and cried our eyes out. We left with only the clothes on our backs.

So, my sister and mother and I loaded into that little red Volkswagen bug along with the neighbor lady Emma and her two small children Stedman and Lena. We were almost there when we were shot at by Muslims. Thank God Arab security rode up on horses and stopped them, for I would not be telling my story today if not for them.

I remember that I kept crying and asking my mother what was going on. She kept screaming at me to keep my head down and to keep the other children's heads down too. She was holding up my dad’s attaché case to the window thinking it would somehow shield us. I am not positive but I am sure attaché cases were not bulletproof back then.

My father made sure we were on the second plane evacuated out of North Africa to Madrid, Spain that fateful day. He was beside himself -- he didn't know when or if he would see us again.

After take off, the lady sitting behind us on the plane was so upset she stood up and got sick all over my mother. With no clothes to change into my mom lived in those clothes the whole trip. She had only a bag of hair rollers in her hand.

From Madrid, Spain we went to Albany, Georgia, where we spent several months before my parents made a decision for us to go back to Africa.

Returning to a now unfriendly country in 1968 was a very hard decision for my parents. We had been separated from my father for 9 months and we had to weigh the risks. Things had calmed down a little. This time we lived on the base for obvious security reasons. We very seldom ventured off the base. When we did go out my mother would tie pacifiers around our necks with string to make us look like babies. We would cry in protest, saying “we’re not babies.”

One day, in 1969 we were caught in Qaddafi's motorcade in our little red Volkswagen. Just when we thought things were getting safer, the day we go out there's a revolution and a military coup! Qaddafi had recently staged a successful coup against the Libyan government.

It was 110-115 degrees outside. We tried to roll the windows up but we were not fast enough. Raging Muslims spit on my little sister before we could get the windows up. They were rocking our car and shouting at us. We made it out of there and back to the base by the sheer grace of God. Again we asked, “Why do they hate us? Why would they want to hurt little girls?”

Soon after, we all left North Africa for good.

There is so much more to this story, but to this day my father does not like to talk about it. In fact, he breaks down in tears whenever one of us brings it up.

Let me end with this:

This was my first taste of Islamofascism, what I now know to be the hatred by radical Muslims towards anyone who will not worship Allah or be enslaved by their cruelty and oppression. Those they cannot dominate they will kill.

ACT for America
P.O. Box 6884 Virginia Beach, VA 23456

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Saturday, April 19, 2008


Many of you that read this website probably writes or blogs at more than one place. I know I do. I also post at various social network blogs to get a feel for the feed back of that which I post or write. It is amazing how I am a hero at one social network and considered a pariah at another.

Anyway I was given a heads up from a Vox social blogger (
United States Military Men and Women of Valor) about a blog post from a person that calls himself The Historian and his blog The Real World. The Historian also has a blog of the same name at Blogspot.

The post you have just got to read is about taxes. To be more precise, it is the hypocrisy of the Leftist Democrats who call for more taxes to collectively share America’s wealth for the poor and Middle America.

Here is the hypocrisy: Ironically there is as many wealthy Democrats as there are Republicans. In fact “The Historian” believes most of America’s wealthy elite are Leftist Democrats rather than Republicans. When it comes to wealth, the rich elitist protect their wealth just on the same scale that wealthy Republicans do. The hypocrisy is that Leftist rich Democrats call for a distribution of wealth via taxation; however the tax payer is Middle America and NOT wealthy Leftists any more than wealthy Republicans.


JRH 4/19/08

Friday, April 18, 2008

You Could Have Heard a Pin Drop

I have to be strait; I hate chain mail and chain emails. Usually they are fictitious. Even if they were factual, by the time the Chain goes through hundreds of people the facts become distorted. Then there is the send it or be cursed or send it and some kind of financial gain will mysteriously happen yada, yada and yada.

I received this chain email. God only knows how long it has been passed around. By the time it came to me there were various fonts and italic and so on; nonetheless it is one of those things that one reads that points to pride in America. It also demonstrates just how much Leftists are a bunch of repugnant American hating moonbats. On this point alone I am going to clean it up and post it.

O yeah, there will be no curses or promises of remuneration.

Enjoy my fellow real Americans:

JRH 4/18/08

You Could Have Heard a Pin Drop

When in England at a fairly large conference, Colin Powell was asked by the Archbishop of Canterbury if our plans for Iraq were just an example of 'empire building' by George Bush.

He answered by saying, 'Over the years, the United States has sent many of its fine young men and women into great peril to fight for freedom beyond our borders. The only amount of land we have EVER asked for in return is enough to bury those that did not return.

You could have heard a pin drop.


Then there was a conference in France where a number of international engineers were taking part, including French and American. During a break one of the French engineers came back into the room saying 'Have you heard the latest dumb stunt Bush has done? He has sent an aircraft carrier to Indonesia to help the tsunami victims. What does he intend to do, bomb them?'

A Boeing engineer stood up and replied quietly: 'Our carriers have three hospitals on board that can treat several hundred people; they are nuclear powered and can supply emergency electrical power to shore facilities; they have three cafeterias with the capacity to feed 3,000 people three meals a day, they can produce several thousand gallons of fresh water from sea water each day, and they carry half a dozen helicopters for use in transporting victims and injured to and from their flight deck.. We have eleven such ships; how many does France have?'

You could have heard a pin drop.


A U.S. Navy Admiral was attending a naval conference that included Admirals from the U.S., English, Canadian, Australian and French Navies. At a cocktail reception, he found himself standing with a large group of officers that included personnel from most of those countries. Everyone was chatting away in English as they sipped their drinks but a French admiral suddenly complained that, 'whereas Europeans learn many languages, Americans learn only English....’

He then asked, 'Why is it that we always have to speak English in these conferences rather than speaking French?'

Without hesitating, the American Admiral replied ’Maybe it's because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies and Americans arranged it so you wouldn't have to speak German.'

You could have heard a pin drop.



A group of Americans, retired teachers, recently went to France on a tour. Robert Whiting, an elderly gentleman of 83, arrived in Paris by plane. At French Customs, he took a few minutes to locate his passport in his carry on. 'You have been to France before, monsieur?' the customs officer asked sarcastically.

Mr. Whiting admitted that he had been to France previously. 'Then you should know enough to have your passport ready.'

The American said, 'The last time I was here, I didn't have to show it.'

'Impossible. Americans always have to show your passports on arrival in France!’

The American senior gave the Frenchman a long hard look. Then he quietly explained. 'Well, when I came ashore at Omaha Beach on D-Day in ‘44, I couldn't find a Frenchman to show it to.'

You could have heard a pin drop.


Please say this prayer. Then pass this on if you want.....

Dear God, We love you and we praise you Father. Thank you for keeping America free even though we don't deserve it. Forgive us Father when we forget to thank You for our young men and women who fight to keep the wars from our shores and for the fact that we are privileged to just be born in America. Father, continue to watch over us and our Armed Forces around the world and keep us all safe and Jesus precious name we pray...


War on Christianity?

Okay let us try to at least pretend to be observant.

Secular Humanism under the guise of moral relativist organizations have been warring against Christianity, against Christian morality and the Christian inspiration for the rule of law in America for over half a century. Some of my fellow zealots may even place this Leftist war on Christianity at an even greater length of time, but I personally don’t have the time to do the research to pin point Secular Humanistic slow erosive acts against Christianity in America. Let us just say that legal actions that would have been unthinkable fifty years ago are becoming common in this early part of the 21st century.

Just a few days ago I posted about a Christian business was fined over six-thousand dollars for
refusing to do a photo op for a same sex union ceremony in New Mexico. Evidently the State of New Mexico has made State level anti-discriminatory laws which unconstitutionally override the Federal Law in the First Amendment in which is stated specifically that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion (thereof).

Let’s see if I can find some anti-Christian legal battles either instituted by the Government, the ACLU or the various deviant homosexual rights organizations (not necessarily in order).

    Navy Lt Gordon James Klingenschmitt was court-martialed and booted out of the Navy for praying in the NAME OF JESUS.

    Tyler Chase Harper in 2003 chose to wear tee shirts that said “I will not accept what God has condemned” and “Be ashamed, our school has embraced what God has condemned.” The
    Poway Unified School District chose to punish Harper for expressing Constitutional First Amendment Right to freely exercise his religious beliefs.

    Mohammedans are provided special rooms and/or occasions to pray in
    Public and Collegiate level schools; however Brittany McComb was prevented from giving her Valedictorian speech in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2006 because it was known she was going to express her faith in Jesus Christ.

    In 2007 the American Family Association sends out an Action Alert about the
    Senate and the House of Representatives working on legislation that would Pastoral or Ministerial sermons on the sinfulness of homosexuality a hate crime.

    Here we are
    AGAIN with the Day of Silence garbage in 2008 in which many Public Schools across the nation will force student to learn that homosexuality and transgender lifestyles are not deviant. This is happening with impunity knowing the big money for litigation is with the homosexuals via homosexual organizations and especially the ACLU (the King pen of anti-Christianity).

    I could on and on; nonetheless I have to mention Secular Humanist war against one of the most Holy Days of Christianity –
    Christmas. Way too many corporate store chains are falling into the same pit the Left has forced the government into, viz. censoring Christmas because it is Christian. The big Capitalists (and I not against Capitalism) want to be Leftie Politically Correct and make their Christmas dough at the same time. Every Christmas comes a controversy: no Santas; no Salvation Army bell ringers, the replacement of “Merry Christmas” with “Merry X-mas” or “Happy Holidays” and so on.

Is there a war on Christianity in America? You’re darn toot’in!

The latest stupidity in battling Christianity is an ACLU legal win in banning a quarter century school tradition of praying before Football Games at East Brunswick High School located in New Jersey. The Coach even tried to accommodate the ACLU by refraining from verbal prayer but having a student lead in a moment of silent prayer.
The Court said NO!


Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Jaffa Examines Wright’s Bad Attitude

Writing for the Claremont Institute, Harry V. Jaffa rebuts the anti-American, anti-white, generally racist and Black victimization sermon excerpts you probably have heard or read of Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

In case one has been ignoring the American Race for President of the United States,
Wright was the former Senior Pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ and the acknowledged spiritual mentor of Barack Hussein Obama.

The one angle I am not sure I agree with Jaffa is his unique theme of justifying White enslavement of Black Africans that eventually have become African-Americans. I don’t disagree with his reasoning; however his case just comes across as the very attitude that has made Black Americans agree with Wright’s vision of Black victimization by the “White Man.”

In my way of thinking racism is racism. It is irrelevant if the racists are White or Black. If a Black person hates a person because he is White it is wrong. If a White person hates a Black person because he is Black it is wrong.

I am certain a Black American that reads Jaffa’s essay and has any knowledge of history will point out that many of the Founding Fathers that are claimed to decry the institution of slavery were slave owners until the day they died. This includes icons like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.

With that bit of criticism on my part I have to say
Jaffa’s essay is a good read that examines the reality of times of the existence of slave institution in America. An America in which a Black man still faces some hurdles yet with some good old fashioned American work ethic can and have become successful citizens of the United States of America. So I say get over your past and contribute to building a future in which racism becomes merely a practice of the fringe few or with God’s help eliminated (the last thought of elimination may be a bit utopian but I had to add it).

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Europe or Eurabia?

Here are some interesting thoughts on the Islamization of Europe by Daniel Pipes. Hopefully to inspire you to read the entire article, I think a good summation of Pipes’ point is this: Europe will voluntarily slip into Islamization or as Sharia Law confronts European Egalitarianism, civil war or civil wars will break out across European lands that have significant Mohammedan populations.

Just at the top of my head this would include most of Western Europe (e.g. Britain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Germany and so on) and Russia.

Even though this essay is about a potential Eurabia, it would behoove America, Canada and Australia to take a long look at what a non-Western Culture can do to society.

JRH 4/15/08

Fighting Global Islamist Ideology the Key to War on Terror

The American Congress for Truth emailed a summary of Steven Emerson’s testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. The email is dated April 14 the reposted article is dated April 10, 2008 from the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT).

Emerson writes that al-Qaeda has regained strength thanks to safe havens in Pakistan. He also touches on his astonishment (and mine and should be all Americans) of the government use of Mohammedan-American organizations that have links to terrorism abroad.

Also Emerson touches on the nefariousness of the behind the scenes support of Islamist organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood.

As part of my goal to expose Islamism as a Fifth Column contingent within America and an anti-American force for violence from foreign terrorists, I encourage you
to read Emerson’s testimony.

JRH 4/15/08

Monday, April 14, 2008

Christian Business Fined For Upholding Their Faith

Here is a classic example of the homosexual agenda exploiting the belief that homosexuality is an immoral practice by using anti-discrimination or hate crimes laws to PUNISH a business that declined to do a photo opt for a same-sex marriage. The State Government is using anti-discrimination laws to prevent the free exercise of religion as protected under the First Amendment to protect the practice of a horrible disgusting lifestyle in which the Bible believing Christians find sinful.


JRH 4/14/08

Pendleton 8 Comment

I received a comment concerning the Pendleton 8 recently. It has taken me some time to peruse the comment and for that I apologize. The post was sent by *WB. WB contends the Pendleton 8 were railroaded to Court Martial because of the public perception (no doubt as described by the MSM) painted a picture of a heinous crime in Hamdania, Iraq.

Here is the initial background to the Hamdania incident as described in 2006:

    Assault charges were filed against six Marines on Thursday as the result of an incident that occurred in April in the Iraqi village of Hamdania and was uncovered during an unrelated investigation into the slaying of an Iraqi civilian later that month, military officials said.

    Three of the Marines charged Thursday are currently in the brig at Camp Pendleton on kidnapping and murder charges in connection with the April 26 slaying of 52-year-old Hashim Ibrahim Awad in Hamdania. The other three had not been charged in that case.

    Meanwhile, a seventh Marine, an officer, is expected to be charged next week in the assault case, according to Lt. Col. Colby Vokey, the Marine Corps' defense coordinator for the western United States. The nature of the assault was not described.

    The six charged in the assault were identified as Lance Cpl. Saul H. Lopezromo, Pfc. Derek I. Lewis, Lance Cpl. Henry D. Lever, Sgt. Lawrence G. Hutchins III, Cpl. Trent D. Thomas and Lance Cpl. Jerry E. Shumate Jr.

    Hutchins, Thomas and Shumate are also charged in the Awad slaying.
    Attorney Joseph Casas, who represents Pfc. John Jodka III, one of the eight people charged in the Awad slaying, said that investigation uncovered incidents separate from the killing in which Marines allegedly engaged in misconduct.

    Casas had not seen the charge sheets for the three Marines named only in the assault case, but is familiar with the almost 600-page investigation report. He said it details incidents where Marines allegedly extracted information from suspected insurgents, or "high-value individuals," using force.

    "The charges are going to be about the nature and method with which these Marines obtained information," Casas said. "It will probably be that they used physical force."

    According to a statement from the Marine Corps, the assault charges are not connected to Awad's April 26 death.

    In bringing murder charges against the seven Marines and one Navy corpsman now in the Camp Pendleton brig, investigators say that without provocation they went into the Hamdania, took Awad from his home, tied him up, put him in a hole and shot him.

    After the killing, according to investigators, the troops placed an AK-47 assault rifle in Awad's hands and put a shovel in the hole to make it appear he was an insurgent planting explosives.

    In coming weeks, the charges against the eight in the brig are to be considered at an Article 32 hearing, which is similar to a grand jury proceeding. At such a hearing a commanding officer determines if there is probably cause to bring the defendants to trial. (
    Free Republic Archive)

Not a pretty picture. Thing is evidence is beginning to come to the surface that the government case against the Pendleton 8 may have used prosecutorial misconduct in order to appease the anti-American insurgent propaganda in Iraq and the biased reporting of the MSM of what happened in Hamdania. It sounds much like the same circumstance to try to railroad the Haditha Marines over a non-existent massacre there. (You can follow the Haditha thread HERE)

Here is the WB’s Comment Post relating to the frame of the Pendleton 8:

JRH 4-14-08

Pendleton 8 Exposed
Fri 4/11/2008 9:51 AM

Documents and other evidence that have not been seen in public - ever before - will be posted soon...

Coming to an internet connection near you.




Pendleton 8 Exposed - The Real Story, Part 1

Just to let ya know who's interested, the site meters from Euphoric Reality and the JagHunter are quite revealing...

The NIST. Yes, That National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Military contractors and sub-contractors from the UK.

Guild Associates. Google 'em. [SlantRight Editor – Sample of Google search: Here, Here, Here, Here and Here to show a miniscule few] i.e.: Information Systems, U.S. House of Representatives ...

Universities and colleges who have contracts with DARPA and other military contractors.

US military bases and contractors from the East Coast to the West Coast.

Dozens of 'em...

Why are they so

Give ya a hint: Ike, and General Butler before him...were absolutely right.


Warren "Bones" Bonesteel
Author and Researcher
Sgt USMC 1976-1983
55 Crestview Drive
Rapid City, SD 57701
(605) 348-2830

I am not certain if Warren “Bones” Bonesteel is a pseudonym or not. My readers can do the research on that. As a rule I do not show the identity of commenters; however WB placed this information as part of his actual comment and so I am including it. Nonetheless, the Euphoric Reality and the “Pendleton 8 Exposed – The Real Story” are authentic links that I did verify. In fact you should check out the story written by Kit Lange on April 9, 2008.

JRH 4/14/08