Wednesday, February 28, 2007

The Mecca Accords and Israel


I have found a kind of scholarly version of the Mecca Accord. I provide it as an alternative to the DEBKAfile analysis I posted on February 11 at SlantRight.com. I still agree with DEBKAfile assessment that Saudi Arabia is re-asserting influence over the Palestinians via money and a mutual affinity of the Sunni Sect. The Saudis were beginning to view Shi’ite Iran as usurping Saudi preeminence.

The
MEMRI analysis I am posting does not mention Iran specifically as does the DEBKAfile; however MEMRI does imply that the Saudis created Hamas as a counter to Iran client terrorist group Hezbollah.

I encourage all to take the time to
read the MEMRI analysis. You will come away understanding that the Mecca Accord and the Saudi government will continue to remain hostile to the existence of a Jewish nation known as Israel.

Once you have that understanding, keep it in mind when you read praise from the Mainstream Media (MSM) and beaming congratulations on the efficacy of diplomacy over guns and military might. The Mecca Accord is merely a Mohammedan duplicitous move to end Israel’s existence.
JRH

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

What Would Mohammed Do? (WWMD)


I was surfing The Religion of Peace website and found this bit of humor which is really quite tragic.
****************************

If this true-to-life image of Muhammad, the self-proclaimed prophet of Islam, offends you more than the murder of thousands of innocent people explicitly in the name of Islam and Allah each year, then it means that you are definitely a Muslim (or at least a well-known type) and this page is for you.

As a Muslim, you know that life is full of tough choices. Do you behead or not behead? Have adult relations with your buddy's 9-year-old child...? Take a female sex slave... ?

For followers of the Religion of Peace, it all comes down to knowing what Muhammad did when faced with the same decisions (based on reliable Muslim sources, of course). In fact, the more you know about the founder of Islam the better, even if you aren't Muslim.

Forget all those shifty-eyed apologists, trying to make Muhammad out to be some sort of "Jesus clone" based on a few obscure anecdotes. The prophet of Islam definitely wasn't one to turn the other cheek.

You want the truth? Think you can handle it? Well, here you are then...
What Would Muhammad Do?(a checklist)


Would Muhammad...?
YES!
NO!
Muslim Source
Have sex with a 9-year-old girl?

Hadith
Advocate beheading?

Qur'an
Require women to cover their faces?

Qur'an & Hadith
Befriend Christians and Jews?

Qur'an
Own slaves?

Qur'an & Hadith
Marry his daughter-in-law?

Qur'an
Approve of prostitution?

Qur'an & Hadith
Gluttonize?

Ibn Ishaq
Recommend wife-beating?

Qur'an & Hadith
Hit his own wife?

Hadith
Kill prisoners of war?

Hadith
Advocate suicide attacks?

Qur'an & Hadith
Kill apostates?

Qur'an & Hadith
Tell sick persons to heal them-selves by drinking camel urine?

Hadith
Beat children who don’t pray?

Hadith
Have eleven wives?(at one time)

Hadith
Lie?

Qur'an & Hadith
Enslave women and children?

Hadith & Ibn Ishaq
Stone adulterers to death?

Hadith
Torture a man for greed?

Ibn Ishaq
Consider men and women equal partners?

Qur'an & Hadith
Steal?

Qur'an & Hadith
Kill someone for insulting him?

Qur'an & Hadith
Preach love for people of all religions?

Qur'an & Hadith
Extort money from other religions?

Qur'an & Hadith
Keep women as sex slaves?

Qur'an
Force conversions to Islam?

Qur'an & Hadith
Commit acts of terror?

Qur'an & Hadith
Kill a woman?

Biographers
Capture a woman and rape her?

Hadith

TheReligionofPeace.com Home Page

ISRAEL desperately need friends


I am a member of what Jews and mainline Christian denominations would call the Evangelical Christian Right. From the Jewish point of view, there is a huge distrust of Christians in general because of a long history of anti-Semitism in Europe. I have just read from MICHAEL H. STEINHARDT writing for the Jerusalem Post, that the Jews of Israel particularly mistrust Evangelicals. The reason being, Evangelicals support Israel based on eschatological belief systems with Jewish Temple building, Biblical Jewish borders, Jesus Christ as the returning Messiah to submerge Judaism into Christianity and a bit of intolerance on social issues from abortion to prayer in schools and so on.

Steinhardt makes the point that Jews need to get over it. Why? Evangelicals and Jews have one common agreement: The Land Israel needs to continue existence as a nation in perpetuity.

(H/T to
Atlas Shrugs)

Sudden Jihad Syndrome


Here is the Left’s explanation for the violence of home grown Mohammedans: Sudden Jihad Syndrome.

So there you go. It is the ultimate in appeasement and burying one’s head in the sand. The left cannot believe their own eyes: when individual Mohammedans go on a murderous rampage, political correctness cannot associate the perfidy with political Islam. NO! It must be a mysterious malady that neurologically explodes in a Mohammedan’s brain which causes him or her to kill innocent non-Mohammedan Westerners.

Carolyn Glick examines the mystery how the police authorities and Universities of the West promote Jihadists and discriminate against Jews.


Monday, February 26, 2007

Iran Defiant as World Powers Meet in London


The global community generally condemns the Bush Administration wish to prevent WMD quality nuclear enrichment from occurring in Iran. Well really I guess the global community does not complain about the idea of prevention, rather they denounce the Bush Administration call for harsh sanctions or military intervention to prevent a nuclear Iran.

The global community (particularly EU) did not learn the lesson of Neville Chamberlain: dealing with devils only stalls the inevitable. The “Peace in our time” pitch is a devilish lie to build an armament to achieve the political goals stated in public and in writings.

Here is a
Jewish perspective from Arutz Sheva.

If Iran Nuke Facilities Attacked ...


Whether or not reports from Western media are rumor or propaganda, WorldNetDaily is reporting that Iran is preparing for an attack. One of the Shi’ite psycho-nation’s preparation methods is to notify their client terrorist organizations to retaliate against the USA and Israel regardless if an attack is a joint effort or a singular effort.

Sunday, February 25, 2007

3 Gulf states agree to IAF overflights en route to Iran


It is becoming apparent a lot of people in the Middle East believe an attack of some sort is imminent upon Iran. Check this out!
JRH
******************************


Report: 3 Gulf states agree to IAF overflights en route to Iran

By Yoav Stern and Yossi Melman, Haaretz Correspondents
Last update - 11:02 25/02/2007

Three Arab states in the Persian Gulf would be willing to allow the Israel Air force to enter their airspace in order to reach Iran in case of an attack on its nuclear facilities, the Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Siyasa reported on Sunday.

According to the report, a diplomat from one of the gulf states visiting Washington on Saturday said the three states, Qatar, Oman and the United Arab Emirates, have told the United States that they would not object to Israel using their airspace, despite their fear of an Iranian response. Al-Siyasa further reported that NATO leaders are urging Turkey to open its airspace for an Attack on Iran as well and to also open its airports and borders in case of a ground attack.

According to a British diplomat who spoke to an Al-Siyasa correspondent, Turkey will not repeat the mistake it made in 2003, when it refused to open its airspace to U.S. Air Force overflights en route to attacking Iraq.
British newspaper The Daily Telegraph reported Saturday that Israel is negotiating with the U.S. over permission for an "
air corridor" over Iraq, should an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities become necessary.

Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh on Saturday denied the reports and said Israel has no such plans.

******************************
And Check out what Atlas Shrugs is doing!

JRH
*************************
When the WAR BREAKS

Sunday, February 25, 2007
Pamela Geller

With the strike against Iranian nuclear facilities near, I want my readers to know that I will be providing unique, uncensored, real-time coverage of the conflict. I will be talking to the beseiged people of Israel and providing video links to and from Israel with commentary by real counter terrorism experts in the Jewish State. My reportage and that of MNM will be free from jihad loving or left leaning western editorial slants. The real story......only I will leave the comments of thumbsucking "analysts," fat draft-dodgers, agenda driven pundits, and feckless politicians to CNN and FOX-News.

PLEASE prayers for our brave Israeli brothers and sisters who have stood alone against the scourge of Islamic terrorism for 58 years. Long live the People of Israel. (Inspired by Michael)

************************************
Evidently Pamela has a lesser opinion of FOX News. I still like them.

Anyway, whether the Jewish news of Haaretz is true or false and the blogosphere is true or false; the mere talk of such an event should the Western World glued to some source of information. If Iran is attacked and Iran actually retaliates, it could be the beginning of the biggest global war since WWII. There are a lot of variables, let us see how they play out.
JRH


Help Prevent Shari'a at Twin Cities Airport


Okay I realize this post might be a little dated, however readers need to be made aware that Mohammedans in America are attempting to set apart the Law of the Land.

The Politically Correct are so concerned about Islamophobic Americans that they are willing to allow Mohammedans to enjoy their intolerant beliefs at the expense of non-Mohammedans. This issue has arisen in the Twin Cities (Minnesota) in which Mohammedan cab drivers refuse service to airport patrons that might violate their beliefs. Apparently a significant amount of cab drivers in the area are Mohammedan.

To uphold the ability of Mohammedans to discriminate against patrons that carry items that are legal is to allow a precedent of Mohammedan Sharia Law to be Superior to American Constitutional Law. This cannot happen!

JRH
******************************
Help Prevent Shari'a at Twin Cities Airport
Date: 2/22/2007 at 6:42:07 pm

We’ve had several posts about the Muslim cab drivers at Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport, and their refusal to accept passengers carrying alcohol and blind people with guide dogs, at the urging of the Muslim Brotherhood front group calling itself the Muslim American Society. Daniel Pipes sent out an email to his list on this subject, because the Metropolitan Airports Commission is inviting the public’s input on the matter. The public hearing notice for the Airports Commission is here: Taxicab Ordinance #102: Public Hearing Notice.

And here’s Daniel Pipes’ email on the subject:
More on Those Alcohol-shy Minnesota Taxi Drivers
.

Dear Reader:

A further decision is due in the controversy over taxi drivers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport who refuse to transport passengers visibly carrying alcohol. The Metropolitan Airports Commission, which has jurisdiction over the drivers, invites the public’s opinion; and I urge your involvement.

MAC has sent a notice (which I have posted in full on my website) that recounts developments since its decision in October 2006 to deny requests by drivers to distinguish between Shar’i-compliant and –noncompliant taxis. MAC writes:

For the past several months, the Metropolitan Airports Commission has worked with airport taxi industry representatives and with leaders from the Muslim American Society and the Somali Justice Advocacy League. The goal was to find a solution acceptable to everyone and transparent to the customer seeking airport taxi service. Unfortunately, those discussions have not resulted in a workable, voluntary, consensus-based solution. As a result, the Airports Commission is proposing stricter penalties for refusal of service: a 30-day suspension of a driver’s airport taxi license for the first instance, and license revocation for a second instance.

Bravo to MAC. It is important that the drivers be sent a strong signal that they must obey the regulations. Were they allowed to boycott travelers with alcohol, I pointed out in “Don’t Bring That Booze into My Taxi,” that would intrude Islamic law “into a mundane commercial transaction in Minnesota” and could lead to the transport system as a whole being divided “between those Islamically observant and those not so.”

I appealed to readers in October to urge MAC to impose penalties on those who insist on imposing Shar’i norms in Minnesota and to send a message that this practice is unacceptable. The barrage of e-mails and phone calls had the hoped-for effect. According to airport spokesman Patrick Hogan back then, “we’ve heard from Australia and England. It’s really touched a nerve among a lot of people. The backlash, frankly, has been overwhelming. People are overwhelmingly against any kind of cultural accommodation.”

Again now, I appeal to all those opposed to application of the Shari’a in the United States to make their views heard in Minnesota. You can do this in either of two ways.

In writing: MAC is asking for “input from the public” through Friday, March 2, 2007, before it makes a decision on the proposed increase in penalties. Written comments should be addressed to:

Landside Operations Department
Metropolitan Airports Commission
MSP International Airport/Lindbergh Terminal
4300 Glumack DriveSuite LT-3129B
Saint Paul, MN 55111-3010.

In person: For those living in the Twin Cities area, MAC will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 27, 2007, at 2 p.m., to solicit testimony from the public via verbal or written testimony. The location will be at:

Ramada Mall of America (formerly, the Thunderbird Hotel)
2300 East American Boulevard
Bloomington, Minnesota

I thank you in advance.

Yours sincerely,
Daniel Pipes

Saturday, February 24, 2007

ANTI-WAR PROTESTORS OUT OF CONTROL!



Here is a Move America Forward update on “THESE COLORS DON’T RUN:”

· PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO EVERYONE YOU CAN!

As reported by The Hill newspaper, Capitol Police were ordered to stand down and allow anti-war protestors to spray paint the U.S. Capitol steps and grounds with anti-war and anarchist slogans.
READ THE REPORT HERE

But that's far from the only incident. All across this nation, war memorials and veterans memorials are being desecrated, dishonored and destroyed by anti-war vandals. This week, Move America Forward's Chairman, Melanie Morgan, wrote an expose on the matter. The full details are contained in her shocking column: "Disgracing the memories of American heroes" --
READ IT HERE

MARCH 8th - MARCH 17th
A PATRIOTIC RESPONSE TO THE ANTI-WAR NEGATIVITY, DEFEATISM & VIOLENCE


Move America Forward is proud to be leading a patriotic group of Americans in a national caravan of cars, trucks, motorhomes and other vehicles across the nation in a patriotic, pro-troop effort called "THESE COLORS DON'T RUN." (The effort will culminate in a giant patriotic event in Washington, D.C. where we will join with "The Gathering of Eagles").

Find out where the caravan will be each day - and if we are not coming to your city, then try to organize a mini-caravan of fellow pro-troop supporters to drive down and merge with our caravan across the nation.

CHECK THE CARAVAN ROUTE/ITINERARY AT:
http://www.moveamericaforward.org/

"These Colors Don't Run" PSA



Melanie Morgan invites American Patriots (that excludes unpatriotic cut-n-runners) to the America Moves Forward event: "These Colors Don't Run."

Morgan points support is needed because Moonbats are expected to desecrate monuments (or something like that) at the end of their journey in Washington, DC.

India: Who is in Whose Camp?


When the Bush Administration approached India about strengthening ties, I presumed it was a good thing. When the talks turned to the topic of nuclear power exchange I thought, “Wow!”

The “Wow” was because India has had a history of enmity with Mohammedan nations (Pakistan in particular) and China. At the time I believed a potential America/India alliance could hold the future in a positive light as the inevitable clash between West and political Mohammedanism crashed into explosive conflict.

I was so confident of a future ally that I overlooked the old friendship between India and the former Soviet Union.

Last week
Russia, China and India held a Summit discussing geopolitics in New Delhi on how the three could enhance their presumed National Interests. Officially the Summit was a cumbaya get together to talk about how the three could influence world peace (blah, blah). However the topics included North Korea and the use of multilateral diplomacy to handle global crises (such as Iran).

This troika of friendship cannot be good for the good ole’ USA. If this troika embarked on economic and military cooperation it would definitely challenge American global influence and National Interests.

I still cannot get past the primary military purveyors to rogue nations and consequently Islamofascist terrorists and an India hook-up. As I have written these words India still is a huge target of Islamofascist terrorism. My guess is since the end of WWII India is second only to Israel in the frequency radical Mohammedans murdering innocent non-Mohammedans.

It was
Mohammedan Imperialism in India’s history that slaughtered Hindus in India and basically eradicating Buddhism in the land of its birth. Forced conversions occurred in India during the Mohammedan Imperialism. Hindus also faced extermination and torture for being polytheists; however the Hindus managed to survive extermination in India.

With all this in mind what boggles me is India getting into the bed of the suppliers of its loathsome enemies.

Murtha’s Slow Bleed Strategy


Murtha’s “Slow Bleed Strategy” is aimed at stopping the Troop Surge, however what it really does is exact a demeanor of defeat and places the Troops in Iraq in harms way by holding back funds that provide equipment that protect our soldiers.

Does anyone see the irony? Not too long ago the Democrats were castigating President Bush for not planning well enough for soldiers to have the proper equipment for protection of our soldiers, now Murtha is attempting to make soldier safety an uncertainty in his crusade to administer a defeat for America in Iraq.

JRH
******************************


Stop the Pelosi-Murtha 'Slow Bleed' Today

Republican National Committee
E-Newsletter 8:32 AM 2/22/07
Mike Duncan, Chairman Republican National Committee

Last week, I wrote to you about the Democrat 'slow bleed' strategy for Iraq. Proposed by John Murtha, 'slow bleed' would do exactly what it sounds like: gradually take away the resources our men and women need to fight the terrorists in Iraq. It would limit reinforcements, and possibly even close the bases that offer support and shelter for our troops. The Democrats had hoped to keep the 'slow bleed' plan under the radar by adding it onto other bills, but now even the liberal press are reporting on the story.

A Washington Post editorial last Saturday described the Murtha 'slow bleed' plan as "crudely hamstringing the ability of military commanders to deploy troops" and went on to say this: "Mr. Murtha's cynicism is matched by an alarming ignorance about conditions in Iraq. He continues to insist that Iraq 'would be more stable with us out of there,' in spite of the consensus of U.S. intelligence agencies that early withdrawal would produce 'massive civilian casualties.' He says he wants to force the administration to 'bulldoze' the Abu Ghraib prison, even though it was emptied of prisoners and turned over to the Iraqi government last year. He wants to 'get our troops out of the Green Zone' because 'they are living in Saddam Hussein's palace'; could he be unaware that the zone's primary occupants are the Iraqi government and the U.S. Embassy? It would be nice to believe that Mr. Murtha does not represent the mainstream of the Democratic Party or the thinking of its leadership. Yet when asked about Mr. Murtha's remarks Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered her support."

Even the liberal columnist E.J. Dionne criticized the Murtha 'slow bleed' plan, saying that "the sense that the proposal has been crafted in part for reasons of political convenience and the intricate restrictions it would place on the military are precisely what could doom it."

Those are exactly the reasons 'slow bleed' should be doomed, and we need your help to do it:


· Write a letter to your editor or call in to talk radio today condemning the Democrat 'slow bleed' strategy.

· And then call your Congressman or Senator and tell them not to support a plan that would leave our brave men and women in harm's way without adequate resources to protect themselves.


The Murtha 'slow bleed' strategy is a dishonest and dangerous response to the challenges we face in Iraq. Together, we can and we must stop Congress from passing the Murtha plan.

Sincerely,

Mike Duncan Chairman, Republican National Committee

Paid for by the Republican National Committee Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate's Committee -
http://www.gop.com/


Friday, February 23, 2007

Impotent Muslims Pull Superiority Complex on Temple Mount


I cannot believe Israeli Jews give a flying flip to what Mohammedans think about Judaism most Holy Site The Temple Mount. Evidently Mohammedan superiority complex has won the day for the ideology of death for the Orthodox Jewish Mayor of Jerusalem has acquiesced to Mohammedan rioting and international Mohammedan oinking based on an unsubstantiated myth (Quran) compared to hard archaeological evidence of a Judaic presence on the Temple Mount.

The Western World pressures Israel because they also fear rioting and oil deprivation pressure. And they what? France and Britain without any help from America could push local rioters back to the land of their ancestors and blow up the impotent military infrastructures of the Middle East.

Sounds harsh huh?

I can’t help it. The more I think about the Temple Mount, how Mohammedans treat Jews and Christians, the absurdity of the Danish Cartoons (originally published in Cairo) and on and on; my blood begins to boil. When I think of the Westerners that capitulate to these impotent foreigners, I need to reach for an extra dose of high blood pressure pills.

WAKE UP! KNOW THYSELF!
KNOW THY ENEMY!
JRH
*****************************

Temple Tantrums:
Behind the Arab riots over the Mughrabi bridge project


by David Parsons
ICEJ E-Newsletter
Fri, 23 Feb 2007

Israel has suspended plans for a footbridge from the Western Wall plaza to the Mughrabi Gate entrance into the Temple Mount after preliminary archeological digs in the sensitive area sparked Arab riots in the Old City and Muslim protests worldwide in recent weeks. The pretext for the violence is an 80-year-old Palestinian claim that the Western Wall is actually the Muslim holy site al-Buraq named after the horse in Muhammad’s mythical ‘Night Journey’ to Jerusalem.

The footbridge was to replace a wooden ramp built on an embankment of fill material collapsing from heavy rains and earth tremors in recent years. The endangered ramp leads to the Mughrabi Gate, the only access for non-Muslims entering the Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism.

The project first required archeological excavations to identify any antiquities beneath the proposed bridge, an area rich with layers from the Second Temple, Byzantine and early Islamic periods. Once excavated, the bridge pilings were to be anchored in such a way as to preserve any antiquities found.

Israeli authorities had quietly vetted and approved the project, even receiving a nod from the Jordanian-controlled Waqf (Islamic trust) that oversees the Muslim sites on the Temple Mount. But when the digs began in early February, hysterical Muslim leaders incited riots in Jerusalem after Friday prayers, charging that the work endangered al-Aqsa – the gray-domed mosque on the south end of the Temple Mount.

Israeli officials issued reassurances that the excavations were safely beyond the al-Aqsa compound. But Palestinian leaders countered that the Western Wall is “occupied territory,” as well as an exclusively Islamic holy site known as the “al-Buraq Wall.”Sheikh Raed Salah, the militant head of the Islamic Movement in Israel, urged Arabs to launch a ...

Question Pelosi’s Patriotism, Dang Right


There is a bit of a feud running between Pelosi of the Left Coast and Vice President Cheney. You might say facetiously, “No kidding.” Okay I realize the Left including Pelosi has not been of Cheney’s Christmas list and visa-versa for nigh seven years, however the Democrats have arrogantly have tried to use legislative authority to meddle in executive authority since January 2007.

The Vice President has publicly and in various international locations has said that “House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's opposition to President Bush's Iraq war buildup is
playing into the hands of the al-Qaida terrorist network.” Pelosi has shot back publicly to ask if Cheney is questioning her patriotism.

Realize this is not a direct quote, but Cheney basically said, “Dang right.”

Every moment the Democrats shout we have lost in Iraq, it emboldens radical Islamofascists like bin Laden to wreak havoc on anything not viewed as Mohammedan. That is not patriotic, it is moronic.

Unjustified Liberal or Muslim Criticism


Re: YES, THAT WAS TERRORISM IN SALT LAKE CITY
Name: Justin
Email:
screwyou@yahoo.com:

No doubt you're aware that investigators with the Salt Lake Police have found no evidence linking the killings at Trolley Square with any religious motivation. No doubt you have done some research into the facts of this case before you started talking out your ass. No doubt you won't let facts get in the way of your faith.

__________________________

SlantRight.com Editor:

I doubt Justin is your real name, for the IP places you in Cherryhill, New Jersey. Justin you claim to be from Utah.

Here is the thing, if you read the Comment section right after the post, you would realize that I jumped the gun about connecting Talovic to jihad terrorism.

On the other hand the comment also points out how the Mainstream Media (MSM) does not even mention connections of the superiority complex Mohammedans display when they perpetuate acts of violence.
An example of this superiority complex is the belief that those who insult Islam (I prefer Mohammedanism) must forfeit their life.

Mr. Anonymous and whoever reads this rebuttal to fake Justin should listen to Robert Spencer. Spencer is a scholar of proven credentials that Mohammedans hate. Why? Because Spencer is one of the growing few in the West willing to expose the violent nature inherent in Mohammedanism.

LISTEN TO SPENCER AS HE EXPOSES THE MSM.

Take note Spencer addresses the Mohammedan act of murder in Utah.

Left Wing
CNN describes the actions of murder and mayhem perpetrated by Talovic, BUT mysteriously cannot think of a motive. Knock! Knock! Hello! Talovic's family fled bosnia because Christian Serbs were exacting revenge ethnic cleansing in retaliation to centuries of Mohammedan ethnic cleansing. (NO, I am not alluding to justification for ethnic cleansing. I am just understanding the rage of the Balkan region.)

The mystery has a little more light shed on Talovic if you know his history. It is all guess work, yet I am willing to bet Mohammedan religion had more to do with a murderous rampage than a troubled teen going wacko.

Therefore Cowardly Anonymous Commentator you should look to your own ass crapping a bunch of bull, mine is clean.

More information not released or considered by MSM and the Authorities (local, State and Federal).

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Iran Continues to Defy U.N.


What is it with the United Nations and deadlines? Iran was given to February 21, 2007 to demonstrate progress on the International Body’s demands about going nuke. It is February 22 and the consequence is further deliberation? What is that?

MURTHA: TOOL OF ARAB LOBBY?


I wonder what kind of (Democrat) lie Murtha told his constituents to keep them voting for him after the ABSCAM scandal showed he was prepared to take bribes from (pretending) foreign Arabs?

Ann Coulter wonders as well
HERE.

Is Murtha the Prince of cut-n-run because of current Arab influence?

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Council on American-Islamic Relations Exposed



Some of the info is dated, however the essence of this Anti-CAIR YouTube video is right on!

In case Blogger does not post the YouTube video:
GO Here

Every American should watch this twice!

THESE COLORS DON'T RUN!


 

As you read this open letter from Marine Mom Deborah Johns, think of psycho Cindy Sheehan, ACLU, CAIR, Cut-n-Run Democrats, Leftie Blogs, and Leftie Mainstream Media (MSM) et al.

Mrs. Johns is upset at the Left’s concept of winning war. I am with Mrs. Johns finding the lack of support for those putting their lives in hand so Lefties can spout defeatist rhetoric is crazy-nuts.

JRH
*****************************

Move America Forward

Posted by Melanie Morgan
Written by Deborah Johns
Wednesday, February 21, 2007


The following message is from Marine Mom, Deborah Johns. Her son, SGT William Johns of the U.S. Marines, is currently serving his 3rd tour of duty in Iraq.

I am sick and tired. Sick and tired of how some in this country are turning their backs on our troops at a time when they need our support the most!

This is why I am taking action to speak up, and in particular, why I am helping to lead the “THESE COLORS DON’T RUN” national pro-troop/patriotic caravan being organized by Move America Forward.
This is my letter to you, the American people.

Semper Fidelis: These are not just mere words, they have a meaning greater than their literal definition in a dictionary. They mean “Always Faithful.”

Not only is this the motto of the United States Marines, but also of their families, and it has spilled over into the hearts and souls of all those who serve in every branch of our military and their families as well.

Always Faithful to God. Always Faithful to your brother (or sister) who serves along side you. Always Faithful to your Country… Always Faithful to your Family… Always Faithful to your Commander in Chief.

People ask me every day, “how do you get through the days with a son serving in Iraq?” Well, the answer is an obvious one. Always Faithful to God, Always Faithful to the heroic men and women of the U.S. military who serve along side my son. Always Faithful to the Commander in Chief, Always Faithful to my Country.

However, it does not seem that our political leaders and media representatives have remained Always Faithful.

I have traveled across this country and I have listened to the American people. I have heard the support that is expressed for our military and I know that the American people do support the war on terror. They just want communication. They just want to know what the goals and objectives are.

I understand that the American people wanted change in leadership in the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. I understand the American people want things to go better in Iraq so our troops can come home. However, none of this can be accomplished because of the partisan politics that are taking place, which is ultimately hurting our military. You can’t imagine how much it sickens me to see our troops used as little more than pawns in a chess game where some politicians care more about putting our President in “checkmate” than they do in winning the war our sons and daughters are bravely fighting.

I am tired of those defeat & retreat politicians who say they are patriotic, and then insult the Commander in Chief at a time when we have boots on the ground in war zones. I am tired of the politicians who want us to wave the white flag of surrender, but who then tell me how much they “support our troops.” As a military mom I can tell you ...

READ THE REST HERE

GOD AND GEORGE WASHINGTON


I wish I had found this tidbit of history on President’s Day. Michael and Jana Novak wrote an essay that demonstrates the huge amount of private and public time the Father of our nation honored God Almighty.

George Washington gave thanks to the Divine Providence that often protected his life in cases that others of his day would have died. Washington escaped death so often in military service to both British and Revolutionary America that death avoidance became legendary.

Washington gave thanks so often to God in his day that it makes George W. Bush look secular in comparison today.


Gambling on Defeat


The Vietnam War was a horrible debacle in U.S. military history, however not for reasons the Slanted Left would revise.

Michael Novak in a recent AEI essay says he has resisted comparing Iraq to Vietnam yet one glaring similarity is beginning to stand out. The Democratic Party is setting up Iraq for failure just as it did in a Democratic controlled Congress in the Vietnam War era.

The cut-n-run Democrats are setting up a chaotic withdrawal from Baghdad as it did in Saigon.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Support Swells for Agents Who Shot Drug Smuggler


This is for those of you that have a problem with WorldNetDaily as a rag legitimate source of information. This news is probably the second most liberal rag (considered Mainstream Media) in America.

Unlike WorldNetDaily (hint:
WND Search Page), the Washington Post has not published the actual documents that have not seen the evidence chain. Of course NO ONE has the evidence on the mysterious Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Report that went missing or never existed as exposed by WorldNetDaily.
JRH
**********************************
Support Swells for Agents Who Shot Drug Smuggler:

Conservatives Lead Movement to Free Ex-Border PatrolmenBy Darryl Fears

Washington Post Staff Writer

Saturday, February 17, 2007; Page A02


Early this week, the Bush administration urged angry conservatives to remain calm over the convictions of two former Border Patrol agents who shot an unarmed Mexican drug smuggler, but petitions for their release continued to flood the White House.


It did not help that one the lawmen, Ignacio Ramos, was attacked by Latino gang members in his cell at the Yazoo City Federal Correctional Complex in Mississippi and beaten bloody. Days after prison officials confirmed the beating on Feb. 8, Department of Homeland Security officials admitted that an inspector general's report erroneously quoted Border Patrol agents as saying Ramos and his partner, Jose Compean, intended to kill Mexicans.


Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.), founder of the House Immigration Reform Caucus and a presidential candidate, visited Ramos in prison and told him of the movement against his incarceration, including candlelight vigils, rallies, and a storm of criticism on conservative talk radio and television. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) threatened to call for impeachment proceedings against President Bush if the agents were harmed in prison, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) promised to look into the matter.


John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said that the 700 people who will attend the organization's annual convention in Washington on Feb. 25 will "speak with one voice" against the prosecution and conviction of the agents. The union, which represents Border Patrol agents and other federal workers, implored Bush in a letter this month to pardon Ramos and Compean.


"We think this thing has been mishandled from the start," Gage said. "We're meeting . . . with the head of the Bureau of Prisons. I'm going to raise some hell there to find out why these guys are in that particular institution."


According to a report by the DHS inspector general's office, the incident that landed the agents in trouble started on Feb. 17, 2005, when Asvaldo Aldrete-Davila, an admitted Mexican drug smuggler, drove across the border into Texas with 740 pounds of marijuana. He saw Border Patrol agents trailing him, panicked, and drove into a ditch.


During the chase that followed, Aldrete-Davila scuffled with Compean after the agent tried to smack him with the butt of a shotgun. The agents said they saw something in the suspect's hand and feared for their lives, according to the report and court testimony.


A fusillade of bullets from Compean and Ramos missed. Finally, Ramos took careful aim as Aldrete-Davila neared the border and hit him in the buttocks.


After the shooting, the agents collected all shell casings at the scene, threw them away and did not mention the shooting to superiors, a violation of Border Patrol procedures that call for an oral report after a weapon is discharged, according to the report and court records.


Investigators granted immunity to Aldrete-Davila to lure him back across the border. The story he told was corroborated by other officers at the scene, the report said.


In March last year, Ramos and Compean were found guilty of multiple charges, including assault with a dangerous weapon, discharge of a firearm in commission of a crime, and tampering with a crime scene. Judge Kathleen Cardone issued an 11-year prison sentence to Ramos and a 12-year sentence to Compean in October. The agents appealed to a higher court, and their conservative supporters started to pressure Bush to release them.


Since the convictions, a group called Grassfire.org has collected 40,000 signatures on a "Pardon the Agents" petition. Angry congressional Republicans -- including Rep. Ted Poe (Tex.), Rep. Phil Gingrey (Ga.) and Rep. Walter B. Jones (N.C.) -- also wrote Bush to say they are flummoxed over why the government accepted the word of an illegal-immigrant drug dealer over that of government agents.


"There's clearly a lot of interest in this issue," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. She said the Bush administration has a policy against revealing the number of letters, petitions and requests it receives on any given matter.


"The president has urged everyone to look at the facts of the case, as they were convicted by a jury of their peers," Perino said. "There is a legal process that every defendant is entitled to, and we should let that play out."

*******************

UPDATE: Ramos Lawyers call for a mistrial because Johnny Sutton withheld evidence.

UPDATE: Senate Judiciary Committee postpones Ramos/Compean Hearings originally scheduled for February 27 because of conflicts.

JRH
**********************************

© 2007 The Washington Post Company

Monday, February 19, 2007

WE NEED VICTORY


It is a radical thing to read the musing of a blogger that is similar to my own. The Right Truth Blog reposts some thoughts of the blogosphere. Their wording is not as strong as mine however their conclusion is mutual. IT IS TIME FOR VICTORY!

Radical Mohammedans Strengthen Terrorist Networks


Mark Mazzetti and David Rohde writing for the New York Times, confirm a story I heard on Fox News: al Qaeda is growing in strength and reconnecting with its international network of Mohammedan murderers and thugs.

I was a bit surprised to read this in the NYT, but I am guessing the staff believes it is an embarrassment to President Bush. Really it is confirmation the War on Terror is the Long War. If a Democrat wins the Presidency in 2008, he or she will be publicly humbled by withdrawing troops from either Iraq or Afghanistan. A base of troops needs to be available to finally close the deal on nations harboring terrorists, even if they be old allies (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and the rest that promote radical Mohammedanism).

If a Republican is elected in 2008, he or she needs to finally decide to win this war even it is politically incorrect to do so. Ahmadinejad and bin Laden have attacked the basis of our culture with impunity and have asked the West to convert to Mohammedanism. Maybe it is time to let Mohammedans know that the West (can say) leave the West and Israel alone or we will begin to terminate the locations in the Middle East and Iran that you consider Holy: Mecca, al Aksa and Dome of the Rock come to mind in such a threat.

The Terrorism of radical Mohammedanism (Sunni and Shi’ite) is aimed at decimating civilian familial communal ties. The radicals believe the West and Israel’s devotion to civilians is a weakness; so they murder civilians of the West (and Israel) and hide like cowards in the midst of their own familial communities knowing how much the West finds it horrific to throw the baby out with the bath water. I say send a warning of what will happen, if it is not heeded, follow through forthwith.

How’s that for a politically incorrect thought? Let’s quit playing around and finish this.

Homosexuals Target State Elections



Ever heard of Tim Gill? He is a computer geek that founded software company Quark. He is also a wealthy homosexual.

Gill has used his influence to create a network of influential
homosexuals to target State legislatures to defeat anti-homosexual Congressman and replace them with Congressman with an affinity for alternate lifestyles.

Believe it or not the only real problem I have with this agenda is that big bucks are being donated from outside of the States the Congressmen are running for election. American citizens have the right to be immoral and promote an unholy lifestyle in America.

But get this! So do Christians. The Christian Right also has the right to fight for Godly morality in America. Now that the agenda of homosexuality is exposed, Christians need to organize to donate money to targeted Congressman of Gill’s homosexual network.

I know I will hear the Secular Humanist critics call me a homophobe. I do not fear homosexuals, I merely highly disagree the homosexual lifestyle is a legitimate morality in the sight of God Almighty the Creator.

If critics attempt to denigrate my stand as out of the mainstream and archaic, then the facts need to be looked at. Heterosexual beliefs are still the mainstream in America. Across the nation States have enacted laws defining marriage as between a male and a female, it has taken Leftwing Courts to counter this trend. Unfortunately for homosexuals, not all courts are dominated by Lefties.

That is why Gill is singling out Congressional races on the State and Federal levels to defeat Conservatives with Secular Humanists favorable to the homosexual agenda.

I would have to say people like Tim Gill are just as much Christophobes as Christians are homophobes. The difference is Christians are backing the Word of God and the Kingdom of God.

Egyptian Blogger May Have 3 Days to Live


Adbel Karim is an Egyptian Blogger critical of radical Mohammedanism. His blogs have landed him in prison. Now his father is prepared to disown Abdel Karim. According to the Religion of peace’s Sharia Law, if Abdel Karim does not repent, the penalty could lead to a death penalty.

READ about it at DhimmiWatch.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Mohammedan Hypocrisy Concerning Temple Mount Archaeology


Over the past weeks there has been a crisis created by the Mohammedans controlling the Mosques on the Temple Mount. The deal is the Israeli government is rebuilding an ancient bridge that was damaged by an earthquake and a snow storm. The WAQF that has the Mohammedan authority over the heathen Mosques on the Holy Temple Mount raised Cain that Jewish construction was too close to a Mosque. This has led to stone throwing by Mohammedans (youth and adult alike) while preparation for bridge building was occurring.

The Israel Antiquities Authority is taking the time to do some archaeological digging for when the bridge is built, the opportunity to look at Jewish history will end for some time.

Now the Mohammedans are all up in arms about the archaeological dig. This is an example of Mohammedan duplicity! The WAQF received a permit to build an exit from a subterranean Mosque below the Temple Mount in the 1990’s; however the WAQF used the permit to begin an extensive building program which trashed Jewish antiquities that were below the Temple.

READ MORE!

Pentagon rules out ground attack on Iran


WorldNetDaily reports that the Pentagon has ruled out the rumors of a land based invasion of Iran.

A military strike is not ruled out, just the land version (and that might be propaganda depending on an Iranian response to other forms of potential American military strikes).

Piling Evidence of Government Conspiracy


Here is further evidence that Ramos and Compean were framed by the U.S. District Attorney’s Office in Texas now with further implication that the Federal Judge was in on it.

Here is a
WND quote:

[Representative] Rohrabacher was harshly critical of both Sutton and President Bush.

"What Ramos and Compean got was a screw job from day one by the U.S. attorney's office in order to send a message to all Border Patrol agents," Rohrabacher told WND. "The message from Sutton was that the president of the United States makes policy on the border, so don't get in the way. If you haven't gotten the message yet, this is an open border."

He said Sutton was running a "public relations campaign" and charged that his purpose has been to "poison the well of public opinion, calling Ramos and Compean corrupt, when there never were any corruption charges, then suggesting they shot an unarmed man in the back, when we only have (the) drug dealer's word he was unarmed and the medical evidence is that he was not shot in the back."

"In the Ramos-Compean case we have lie after lie after lie coming out of Sutton's office," the congressman told WND. "And now we've got a public relations campaign to protect Sutton because he is a protégé of the president and the president doesn't want to see his career destroyed."


Rohrabacher is a Republican Representative from California. His criticism reaches all the way to the White House. If the President is involved in this heinous corruption I would have to come to the point to question his integrity on the War on Terror. If Islamofascists smuggle in chemical or nuke suitcase style WMD, it will be via Mexico.

I am praying Rohrabacher’s is just angry and that there is a localized corruption in the Justice Department and Federal Judiciary in the Texas area.

There should be ample evidence for an appeal, however the President should man up and issue a full and complete pardon.

(Here are FOUR related links:
One, Two, Three and Four.)

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Chamberlains vs. Churchills


Gary McCullough, the Director of Christian Newswire, has written a brief yet insightful opinion on the non-binding House Resolution condemning a surge of troops and proclaiming we lost in Iraq.
JRH
******************************


Chamberlains vs. Churchills

By Gary McCullough


OPINION, Feb. 16 /
Standard Newswire/ -- The following is submitted for publication by Gary McCullough, director of Christian Newswire:

"You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war." -- Churchill's remark after Chamberlain returned from signing the Munich Pact with Hitler


"You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war." This was Winston Churchill's statement after Neville Chamberlain returned from signing the Munich Pact with Hitler.

Today, within the beltway of Washington DC, America's modern day Chamberlains won the day. With all the vigor and clarity of true zealots, supporters of the nonbinding House resolution said "we surrender."

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., said, "What we now have in Iraq is a defeat. We cannot achieve the illusions of the Bush administration that we will be able to create a stable unified liberal democracy in Iraq that is pro-American ... Instead, we have sectarian fighting, death squads and a disabled Middle East that threatens to be engulfed by the nightmare that we have unleashed."

As you read this the words of Waxman, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi fill the newspapers and broadcast airwaves of the Middle East (and North Korea).

Winston S. Churchill stated, "You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word. It is victory. Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all terrors. Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival."

Churchill's foe, Arthur Neville Chamberlain, campaigned and led England under his firm belief that Germany had been wronged by his and other nations. His opinion was that the actions of Germany leading up to what became World War II were those of a victimized people. Chamberlain's words filled the newspapers and broadcast airwaves of Nazi Germany as Chamberlain defeated and mocked Churchill.

Chamberlain said, "We should seek by all means in our power to avoid war, by analyzing possible causes, by trying to remove them, by discussion in a spirit of collaboration and good will. I cannot believe that such a program would be rejected by the people of this country, even if it does mean the establishment of personal contact with the dictators."

Today is the day the Chamberlains got back at the Churchills. Today is the day for "peace" at any price. After all, isn't that what we Americans voted for? There is little doubt that this past November we voted for our Chamberlains and sent many Chruchills packing. Now our new leaders, our Chamberlains, are telling us exactly what we want to hear.

I pray our bold Chamberlains are correct in their plan to not repeat history. But I fear that this is one of those times in which God's answer to our prayers will be that He gave us the freedom to pick our own path, even if that path leads to pain, destruction and
death.
________________________________

Democrats reject Bush troops plan


Feb 16 4:52 PM US/Eastern
BREITBART.COM

The House of Representatives has issued a symbolic rejection of President George Bush's plan to deploy more troops to Iraq.

The 246-182 approval of a resolution opened an epic confrontation between Congress and Bush over an unpopular war that has taken the lives of more than 3,100 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

"The stakes in Iraq are too high to recycle proposals that have little prospect for success," said Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who as leader of the Democratic majority controls the House agenda.

She gained power last autumn in elections framed by public opposition to the war.

"The passage of this legislation will signal a change in direction in Iraq that will end the fighting and bring our troops home," she vowed.

Bush's Republican allies argued against the measure and said it portended a Democratic attempt to cut off money for the troops.

"Their so-called slow-bleed approach is the bite that will surely hurt those fighting under America's flag overseas," said Republican Roy Blunt.

"This non-binding resolution is the first step in an all-too-binding spiral towards defeat in a fight that we cannot afford to lose," he said.

________________________________________

Statement on Non-Binding House Resolution on Iraq

The White House
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
February 16, 2007

The House of Representatives has passed a resolution expressing disapproval of President Bush's plan to send reinforcements to Iraq. This plan enjoys the support of the Iraqi government and U.S. military leadership, including Gen. David Petraeus, Commander of the Multi-National Force in Iraq, who recently was confirmed to his post by an 81-0 vote in the Senate.

The President ordered a new way forward in Iraq because he, like most Americans, believed the existing situation in Iraq was unacceptable. The President concluded that this new strategy was necessary in order to help the Iraqi government gain control over Baghdad, assume more responsibility for security, and pursue reconciliation of all of Iraq's communities.

The resolution is nonbinding. Soon, Congress will have the opportunity to show its support for the troops in Iraq by funding the supplemental appropriations request the President has submitted, and which our men and women in combat are counting on.

The President believes that the Congress should provide the full funding and flexibility our Armed Forces need to succeed in their mission to protect our country.


Friday, February 16, 2007

Haniyeh resigns to form new PA


There is always something dubious in the works when Islamofascist terrorists begin to read from the same page.

Hamas Prime Minister Ismael
Haniyeh has resigned to form a unity government under PA President Mahmoud Abbas all under the auspices of the Mecca Accord brokered by Saudi monarch King Abdullah.

This looks more radical Mohammedan PR than an actual peace process to recognize Israel.

Hanson: Tapping Ahmadinejad’s Egg


Victor Davis Hanson is a man I respect immensely as a pundit writer and historian. I am not so sure I agree with his good intentions of taking the slow route to reign in the global hostility of Iran. Hanson presents a logical and well intentioned approach for America, EU and the United Nations to put the squeeze on Iran without utilizing military confrontation.

Hanson advocates a kind of united America and EU diplomatic assault on Iran through the vehicle of the United Nations slowly squeezing sanctions that Hanson believes will slowly constrict Iran’s compliance to global peace.

Hanson believes Iranian citizens will turn on the Mullocracy and Ahmadinejad if economic and living conditions became unbearable. Frankly I disagree. There is an obvious growing dissent in Iran, however for the most part Iranian have plugged into Shi'ite radicalism hook, line and sinker. We are talking about a regime
that sent children as martyrs in the Iraq/Iran war to clear minefields. I doubt a little discomfort will shake Iranian support of radical Shi'itism.

The problem I have with this approach is that the EU is way too invested economically with Iranian oil to stand completely unified with America. Also, the United Nations Security Council has two permanent members with veto power that also are invested in the Iranian economy: Russia and China. That pretty much neutralizes the United Nations as a vehicle to squeeze sanctions successfully to the point for Iran to take notice. The U.N. sanctions (if any) will always be diluted to favor continued economic relations with Russia and China.

The EU is divided on Iran. Germany may be seeing the light (dimly) of Iran’s evil yet I doubt France would pierce the darkness of Iranian evil unless there was a diverted way to attain oil or Iran directly threatened French pride in some way. The British government is already invested in confronting Iranian evil yet there are a huge block of voters that may change that investment. There are many lesser EU members that adore American democracy since attaining freedom from the tyrannical slavery of the overtly Communist former Soviet Union. These lesser members are primarily from what was known in the Cold War days as the Soviet Bloc.

Hanson’s logic and intentions are sound. Hanson’s conclusions are doubtful to get off the drawing board to be executed.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Neocons Criticize Bush on North Korea


Since Donald Rumsfeld has left the Bush Administration, there is the appearance that President Bush has been overwhelmed in a vigorous Foreign Policy. The President seems to have taken the 2006 election results as an opportunity to abandon being tough on rogue nations such as North Korea.

The President has made
a deal that nearly mirrors President Clinton’s deal in the 90’s. The deal is based on trust and I am not talking about America’s trustworthiness. Just as the Clinton Administration made a deal trusting Kim Jong Il, so has President Bush.

Clinton’s trust led to an insane nuclear micro-nation that utilizes WMD as blackmail to extort the Capitalist Western style nations into providing the necessities of life for North Korea. This is ridiculous for we all know that it is not the North Korean people that enjoy the largesse of Kim Jong Il.

So here is America with a decision that will bite her butt made by a Republican NeoConservative President of all people.

I have some good old fashion conspiracy thinking as to why President Bush has made such a horrendous deal: the North Korean deal is all about Machiavellian politics. Strike a deal to put off North Korea until another day, and then strike Iran.

This will free up a military already hindered by a cut-n-run Democratic Party controlled Congress.

*****************************************
Will Iran get the North Korea deal?