Saturday, March 31, 2007

Revolutionary Guard Leader Planned British Abduction?

Well I have read that Ayatollah Khamenei was the source of the order given to kidnap British Marines and Sailors in Iraqi waters. The reason given in that story was retaliation for United Nations Security Council sanctions.

Now I am reading from
Power Line That Major General Yahya Rahim Safavi der Fuhrer of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and ardent political ally of President Ahmadinejad planned the operation as retaliation for American and the Allies of the willing caught Revolutionary Guard spies in Iraq. Safavi’s end game is probably an exchange of British Marines/Sailors captured in Iraqi waters for Iranian spies captured in Iraq.

Hmm … The appearance is that Iran is doing all the sovereignty violations and expects all the due of the one violated? Typical.

Iran’s Khamenei Ordered Abductions as a Reprisal to U.N. Sanctions

Now how the weak knees of Britain and her allies react to some new information: Dissidents in Iran have acquired information that the Iranian act of war was no mere accident of wrong place at the wrong time. Iran’s abduction of British Marines and Sailors is a reprisal for U.N. tighter sanctions called from the very top: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Britain and America need to demonstrate strength before it is too late. If Iran treats the British captives as a criminal case or abuses them contrary to international Geneva Conventions, instead of hand wringing a demonstration of the power of the West has to extend beyond economic punishment. Britain and America need to act as one to use the Hostages as an excuse to carpet bomb known nuclear facilities and if the need arises, bomb the Iran economy into submission.


Well it looks like the Brits are not going to dare to cross the line drawn in the sand by Iran.

You know growing up as a baby boomer there is an old story that is told. Unfortunately the failing memory of depleting synapses is sketchy on the details and the fact/fiction quality of the story. I am certain many of you have heard the story, so if I butcher it see the point and not the prose.

Briefly the story goes a healthy yet remarkably skin and bones lad is on the beach with a gal. The time was marvelous. In the old days of fun at the beach the big muscle guys worked out there. As it turns out the gal caught the eye of one of the muscle men.

He strolls over to the thin boy. He draws a line in the sand. Muscle man tells skin and bones with a wink toward the gal, “Boy if you cross the line and meet my challenge I will leave you alone, if you don’t that sweet thing on the beach towel next to you comes with me.”

The boy knows he would be pulverized by mister muscles and lowers his head. His gal giggles and leaps to the muscle man’s side. Mister muscles kicks sand in the face of the boy and walks off with the girl.

Yeah I know those chauvinistic days are gone (well officially, I still think the feminist would leap at the opportunity of a muscular man).

The boy is humiliated. How does he handle this heinous insult to his dignity? Does he whisper to his friends and acquaintances that he will launch a diplomatic negotiation with the muscle man and his muscle pals to show truly that his skin and bones are not worthy of such insults? If the boy went to muscle man territory on the beach to demonstrate his verbal prowess of elocution, how do you think the muscle nation will respond? They will probably slap him around and kick a little more sand and laugh a little harder. The boy does not realize that an intellectual exchange with Neanderthals will not succeed. Neanderthals act with what works until the act fails to work.

What does the boy do? He bucks up and works out. Skin and bones become muscle and sinew. The boy not only has an intellect but the strength to back up his words. The boy confidently enters muscle beach to dish out some power to the Neanderthal.

The young man approaches Neanderthal (who still has his gal) and draws a line in the sand. It turns out Neanderthal is a coward. He lacks the intellect to engage a person of equal or greater strength. Muscle man does not cross the line in the sand and flees. The girl is impressed. (Here I’d like to think the young man realizes there are better mermaids in the sea and waves her off, but I don’t remember.)

Britain and America have long left the days of skin and bones behind.
Challenge the scoundrel Iran in response to their act of war.

Friday, March 30, 2007

Saudi Peace Plan is an Israeli Suicide Plan

It is appearing more and more that the Saudi Peace Plan is more of an ultimatum to Israel than a solution for a coexistent Statehood for Israel and Palestine.

The insinuation is Israeli non-compliance will lead to the Mohammedan alternative: a unified Mohammedan war with the Land of Israel.

Let us pray the Appeasers and war weary do not submit to the Saudi Peace Plan. The
Plan calls for Israel to withdraw to 1967 borders before the Arab Middle East tried to obliterate Israel that same year. It also demands that the Eastern portion of Jerusalem (which was Jordanian in pre-1967) be set up as the Capital of a Palestinian State.

Peace Plan is a suicide plan for Israel. The Arab/Mohammedan envisioning of peace is the elimination of Israel.

Feinstein quits committee under war-profiteer cloud

Senator Dianne Feinstein has resigned from Senate Military Construction Appropriations Subcommittee amid scandal that her votes benefited her husband’s business dealings to the tune of B as in billions of dollars.

WorldNetDaily offers all kinds of reasons for the Democratic Senator’s resignation; however I guess the most plausible reason is resigning might hold off investigation into a powerful Democrat’s conduct. Now that the Democrats control Congress it is doubtful any legitimate scrutiny will occur to ferret out corruption.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Iran's seizure of British sailors raises the stakes

Iran wanted to humiliate the British by sanctimoniously proclaiming there would be no negotiation for marine/sailor release until the Brits admitted their cohort was in Iranian waters.

The British have responded with the smoking gun proof that
indeed it was Iran that violated Iraqi waters and in an act of war kidnapped the British Marines/Sailors.

Obviously Iran is using some kind of threat on the captured Brits, for the lone female was made to say on video the Brits were in Iranian waters. So despite the pictures of the captured Brits heartily eating a meal, some kind of mind manipulation or extortion is in play.

Israel's Requirement for Defensible Borders

This post was originally meant as a comment post for “Resistance is Futile Israel, Comply to Saudi Plan or Else.” I believe it offers clarification to what would happen to Israel if the Arabs got their way forcing Israel to pre-1967 borders. The post was too long to be accepted as a comment.

I am a Christian right kind of guy, thus I have reasons of faith for not the existence of Israel, but the Land’s expansion to Biblical proportions.

There is a geopolitical purpose for not decreasing Israel’s borders.

Israel's Requirement for Defensible Borders

Maj.-Gen. (res.) Yaakov Amidror
Defensible Borders for a Lasting Peace

UN Resolution 242: No Restoration of the 1949 Armistice Line

Israel's struggle for "defensible borders" is unique in international diplomacy. It emanates from both the special legal and strategic circumstances that Israel faced in the aftermath of the 1967 Six-Day War, when the Israel Defense Forces captured the West Bank and other territories in a war of self-defense. The previous armistice line of 1949 that separated the Israeli and Jordanian armies was only a military boundary and not a permanent political border, according to the armistice agreement itself. The Jordanian occupation of the West Bank occurred in conjunction with its illegal invasion of the State of Israel in 1948. In fact, Jordanian sovereignty in the West Bank was not recognized by a single Arab state. This provided the background for UN Security Council Resolution 242 of November 1967 which concluded that Israel would need "secure and recognized boundaries" that would necessarily be different from the 1967 lines. The previous status quo was not to be restored. In diplomatic shorthand, President George W. Bush stated on April 14, 2004, that Israel had a right to "defensible borders," in order to ...


Resistance is Futile Israel, Comply to Saudi Plan or Else

Saudi Arabia implies the Middle Eastern Arab world is ready to go to war with Israel. Why? The Saudi have an initiative for a Palestinian State that requires Israel to withdraw from land acquired after defeating a multi-nation Arab invasion in 1967.

I think Israel would foolishly acquiesce to the Saudis except for on small part of the Saudi Peace Initiative. The giving up of all the 1967 territory that should be considered compensation for Arab invasion would include East Jerusalem. The most Holy Site in Judaism is in the eastern portion of Jerusalem – The Temple Mount. Further the entirety of Jerusalem to Jews is the city of David, the king of God’s promise that a descendant would always be in a position to rule Israel. I am assuming for Jews that is a coming Jewish Messiah. For Christians it is Jesus Christ in which His human heritage can be traced back to David via Mary and his step-father Joseph independently.

For Israel to give up any part of Jerusalem would signal the beginning of the Muslim Arab dream: The obliteration of Israel and Jews from the Middle East.

READ THE TELEGRAPH SOURCE POSTED ON PROPHECY UPDATE. Here you will see the Saudi “accept the plan or else war” insinuation.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Britain Must Humiliate Itself

As to be expected the Iranian government is displaying its true nature. The Iranian government has proclaimed that Britain must humiliate itself by apologizing and telling the world their marines were in Iranian waters. Check this out: Only then will there be any talks of release of the British Marines and Sailors. So what Iran is putting on the table the British have to self-immolate themselves and still Iran may not give up their marines that were captured illegally in Iraqi waters.

Christian fired for sharing God

Here is yet another Left Wing power surge to prohibit Christian Free Speech. Is it not ironic that the Left is widely against a troop surge in Iraq for men protecting American Liberty and Freedom. Cut off the funds to win the war and cut out the people that represent a moral foundation in America. Good job comrade Leftie in the government bureaucracy.

Tehran Seizure

AEI’s Michael Rubin also thinks what Iran did was an act of war. Why? The taking of the British Marines/Sailors was methodically planned and carried out by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Mohammedanism and Evil

There is evil in this world. Philosophically evil may be perceived many different ways or to relatively not exist at all. Of course this is all bogus mindsets.

Evil can be known by the fruit it produces. Evil crosses theological concepts yet most theologies condemn the fruit of evil even when exacted by theological adherents.

The central theme of most of the world’s major religions is peace, tranquility and some kind of deliverance or escape from an evil world to a Heaven or union with God or the All.

Guess which religion promises a Paradise of worldly pleasures of selfish sex for the males that die exacting evil violence on combatants and innocents alike? Guess which religion promises Paradise for being in submission to its deity and prophet while simultaneously its adherents plunder innocent people and rape women?

You will not find this in the Scriptures of Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, and Hinduism or even in eclectic faiths as Baha’i. You will find this in the assumed holy scriptures of Mohammedanism.

Mohammedanism will call all who do not believe in Allah and its prophet Mohammed as evil and doomed to judgment. Mohammedanism will fabricate lies about Christianity and Judaism as the people of the Book and allow them to live only if they promise submission to Allah. The current goal of the majority of Middle Eastern Mohammedans is the death of monikers Great Satan (America) and the little Satan (Israel). Mohammedanism wiped the existence of Buddhism from Afghanistan and ancient India. Mohammedanism tortured and murdered polytheistic Hindus in genocidal numbers until it was decided for convenience sake to extend dhimmitude and the jizya tax on the Hindus to perpetuate empire.

What is evil? It is a group of people that practice a religion stuck in the Middle Ages time zone while the present is the 21st Century. What is evil are the Mohammedans residing in Western nations and yet subscribing to Wahhabi tenets that believe nothing in Mohammedan theology is valid after 1000 AD (by Christian reckoning).

What is ludicrous is judging Mohammedanism by Western values of Freedom and Liberty when those very principles are used to encourage Mohammedan supremacy
at the expense of Freedom and Liberty.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Iran says the Brits are Spies

The NEOCON EXPRESS blog has alerted me to a Times Online article that indicates Ahmadinejad intends to prosecute the British military personal that were captured for espionage.

We all know that Iran has dipped into their typical bag of lies and claim that the British were in Iranian waters. The fact is the British were on routine patrol to checking for smugglers and terrorists coming in or out of Iraq.

This makes Iran’s well laid trap an act of war against Britain and by association Britain’s ally the United States. How will the British and Americans respond to this overt act of war? My guess is the namby pamby Left in both nations will whine that Britain and America deserved to be spanked by Iran and we should negotiate peace in our time and give Iran whatever the Islamofascist Messianic fanatics wish.

Who knows? I am just a blogger, I might be wrong about how Britain and America has caved in toward Leftist cowardice.

Read the Times Online and the NEOCON EXPRESS posts HERE.

Islamofascism Today

Wow! I was doing some research on the old Odessa post-WWII group that helped Nazis (war criminals and ideologues) escape Germany. In so doing I came across this web page entitled, “The Nazi, Communist and Radical Islamist Connection.” It basically explains that moderate Mohammedanism is not so moderate, particularly in the Middle East in which Hitler’s Nazi ideology is nearly considered heroic among the common people.

In case you were not aware, most educational media and written material in the Middle East (Sunni and Shia) is disseminated via radical Islamists or Islamofascists. The ability for that to happen is revenue available via oil purchases from abroad. Thus the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the radical Ayatollahs of Iran send their respective teachings to Mohammedan schools, mosques and madrassas in the Middle East and to the Democratic Western nations. The silent propagation of Mohammedanism is by radicals that preach and teach violence to achieve ends.

Anyway, this huge essay compiled by, are a vast supply of news and editorials and pictures from other media outlets. It is a concise exploration that leads up to a conclusion about today’s radical Islamists. You will not become an expert by reading this; however you will have enough information to understand the utter stupidity of the West’s “Politically Correct” pursuits in upholding modern Mohammedanism as just another religion to be respected. One other thing you will see from this collage of articles is that today’s radical Islamism was catapulted into existence by bad decisions of the American Intelligence Community. Frankly those bad decisions are continuing to this day.

Just one more note: there are a huge amount of links and pictures provided to back up the article. I posted “The Nazi, Communist and Radical Islamist Connection” at without showing the pictures and cut way back on the links. If you wish to follow up for your own research or verification go the MideastNewswire link that I provided at the top.

Here is the SlantRight link:
So get ready for a ride of enlightenment about Mohammedanism.

Saturday, March 24, 2007

MAF Caravan on Cavuto

Deborah Johns talks about her patriotic son who has signed up for several tours in Iraq.

Why? Mrs. Johns' son is representative of the prevalent attitude of soldiers in Iraq. The American soldiers do NOT wish to cut-n-run rather they wish to complete the mission with victory.


Wake up America! Wake up Britain! Wake up Europe! Wake up Western Culture!

Have you found the clarity in waking up?

Jihadists and radical Islamists use Western Laws to protect themselves while tearing down Western Freedom and Liberty. The greatest today is that dimwitted Leftists in their deluded quest for egalitarianism then join the Jihadists and radical Islamists in agreement.

If someone does not WAKE UP soon, the two factions will terminate life as the West knows it and become subjugated to Mohammedanism and losing our Freedom and Liberty.

It is in Europe already. It is moving toward America.

U.N. unanimously approves Iran sanctions

The U.N. Security Council has actually stepped to the plate to deliver tougher (well at a little increased) sanctions on Iran. The sanctions only have little more teeth to its bite thus I perceive it will be ignored again. Ignoring the Security Council sanctions means even more time for Iran to enrich weapons grade uranium.

A signal that Iran will ignore Security Council wishes to halt uranium enrichment is the capture of British Sailors. The act was provocative and will probably be used as a negotiating tool. The trading of lives is the primary of tool of negotiation by Mohammedan and terrorist organizations.

Real America fights back

Melanie Morgan has been in the forefront of promoting “These Colors Don’t Run,” which was a pro-Patriotism caravan sponsored preeminently by MoveAmericaForward.

Here is
Melanie’s report on “These Colors Don’t Run.” A function incidentally that most Mainstream Media rarely covered and was threatened with disruption by the anti-war Left Wing hypocrites in America. The caravan ended in Washington, D.C. and had thousands more supporters than the Leftie crowd: A humiliation for the cut-n-runners.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Iran Boldly Captures British Sailors

So Iran has kidnapped British sailors under sketchy circumstances as to whose waters belonged to whom.

The U.N. Security Council is supposed to take action on yet another moment of Iran ignoring compliance to uranium enrichment.

Since Iran has ignored the Security Council for over a year without meaningful action, does Britain think that Iran will just lie down and turn over its sailors?

If Iran thumbs its nose at the British as I suspect, how will the British respond? Will the Brits get a justified burr in their back or will the Brits slip into appeasement and offer everything including the kitchen sink to get their sailors home?

America must react as well, however America must await the British reaction. What will America do if the Brits show courage? Will the Democrats force Bush to abandon our staunchest European ally? If the Brits take the appeasement route, will America simply shake their head in disbelief and wait how circumstances unfold?

Either way,
Iran has drawn a line and is daring the West to cross it.

The Homosexual Lie

Check this out: The LARGEST random sex survey ever conducted has determined that ONLY 1.4% of adults have participated in homosexual sexual relations (data gathered in 2003).

That percentage is extremely fractional. View the statistic of active homosexuals to (let’s say) non-homosexuals: 98.6%.

Now match this with
the obvious money involved in getting Americans to accept homosexuality as a valid alternate lifestyle or the Psychiatrists that have validated the microscopic percentage as normal. Even a mathematical moron can see that 1.4% is deviant from the norm.

Left Wing organizations from the
ACLU and MULTIPLE homosexual rights organizations are attempting to delude the public into believing this infinitesimal population that is morally corrupt should be listed with race, religion and gender in equal civil rights. COME ON!



Homosexuals Less Than 2% of Population Says Report Released Today

Standard Newswire
March 23, 2007

Standard Newswire/ -- According to two researchers, the largest random sex survey ever conducted has reported that only 1.4% of adults engaged in homosexual behavior. Analyzing a 2003 Canadian Community survey of 121,300 adults, Drs. Paul and Kirk Cameron told attendees of the Eastern Psychological Association Convention that 2% of 18-44 year olds, 1% of 50 year olds, and only a third of a percent of subjects 60+ considered themselves homosexual. Thus homosexual activity was much more common among younger adults.

What happened to the older homosexuals? "Some may have ceased to be sexually active," said Paul Cameron, "or they may have died. Recent reports from Scandinavia indicate that the life expectancy of homosexuals is 20+ years shorter than that of heterosexuals."

Among other questions (read to respondent by interviewer), the Canadian study asked:

"Do you consider yourself to be: heterosexual? (sexual relations with people of the opposite sex)/ homosexual, that is lesbian or gay? (sexual relations with people of your own sex)/ bisexual? (sexual relations with people of both sexes)."

"No one can say that this statistic is 'the bedrock truth,'" Paul Cameron said, "but even with attempts to increase the percentage of active homosexuals – which Statistics Canada appears to have done by reporting only the results of those under the age of 60 – the 1.4% is a figure that has to be taken very seriously.

"The US government survey of 12, 381 adults in 1996, reported that 1.3% of men and 1.1% of women under the age of 60 said they'd had homosexual sex in the last 12 months. It also found few older homosexuals. The oldest male who engaged in homosexuality was 54 and the oldest female+ 49. So it appears that homosexuality is a young person's activity – one that may contribute to an early death."

Paul Cameron, Ph.D. & Kirk Cameron, Ph.D., presented "Federal Distortion Of The Homosexual Footprint." Paul Cameron, a reviewer for the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal, and the Postgraduate Medical Journal, has published over 40 scientific articles on homosexuality. The EPA is the oldest regional Psychological Association in the United States. At its Philadelphia convention members presented the latest advances in scientific work to colleagues.

The full report can be accessed at

The Homosexual Lie
John R. Houk
© March 23, 2007


Homosexuals Less Than 2% of Population Says Report Released Today

© Standard Newswire 2006 (sic). All Rights Reserved.


The Politically Correct would have you think that Moderate Islam is the predominate theology among Mohammedans. If that were so you would view this mysterious majority hitting the streets denouncing the acts of Radical Islamists of both the Sunni and Shia. You do not see this!

The Acts the Mainstream Media (MSM) shows are anti-American and anti-Jewish demonstrations both in America and the Middle East. There is NO Mohammedan organization that denounces Islamist Theo-political ideology.

What should an American with brains surmise from this glaring lack of denunciation by so-called Moderates against Radical Islamism? An American with brains should surmise at the very least that
there is wide spread closet support for the radical Mohammedan agenda.

That Mohammedan agenda has been the same since Mohammed became delusional in a cave hearing voices to conquer the world for the demon Allah; i.e. Mohammedan Imperialism.

The New Christian Persecution

Western Europe is probably overcome by a new religion. I am not speaking of Mohammedanism though Mohammedanism is probably the new European religion’s greatest competitor by virtue of rising population demographics and the stupidity of the new religion.

What is that new religion? It is Secular Humanism.

Secular Humanism actively attacks the foundations of Biblical morality. In Britain the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights has recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private or Christian Schools to teach Biblical Morality, viz. that homosexuality is a sin. The effect is to make Christian teachings illegal.

This kind of thinking is moving to America. The new Christian persecution is analyzed by Chuck Colson which I have posted below - READ IT.

Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief: Outlawing Conscience.

By Chuck Colson
Christian Post Guest Columnist
Tue, Mar. 20 2007 11:36 AM ET

You may think the day would never come when preaching the Gospel would be illegal in a Western country—when governments would restrict what Christians can teach.

You would be wrong. The persecution against the Church has taken a decisive turn in the cradle of civil liberty—the United Kingdom (UK). And it will happen in America, also, if we do not wake up to the danger.

In London last month, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private, religious schools to teach that homosexual conduct is immoral. The committee claimed the regulations are needed to combat discrimination against homosexuals.

And we know about this. Last summer, the British government closed down our IFI unit because we teach that sex should be limited to heterosexual marriage. And if these regulations violate the rights of Christians—what does the government say? “Too bad.”

Luke Gormally, a fellow at London’s Linacre Centre, a Christian bioethics institute, put it this way: “The Committee could not be clearer in saying that they believe the freedom to live a practicing homosexual lifestyle trumps the freedom to live a religious lifestyle.”

The committee explicitly said that no exemption should be made for Christian schools. So, unbelievable though it sounds, Gormally notes, when it comes to sexual morality, the committee would make it illegal for Christian schools “to teach that Christianity and its principles are ‘objectively true.’”

Christian schools will not be alone in seeing their religious freedom stripped away. If this law passes, it will be difficult, if not impossible, for ministers to share the Bible’s teachings on sexual morality. Property owners who do not want, for moral reasons, to rent property to homosexuals will be breaking the law. So will Christian printers who refuse to print pro-gay literature.

Last Thursday, a House of Commons committee met to decide on the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Many MPs protested the Blair government’s refusal to allow a full debate in the House of Commons. And despite repeated appeals for a postponement, the chairperson insisted on taking an immediate vote: The regulations were upheld.

Now, the Blair government is attempting to rush the law through both houses of Parliament before opponents have time to organize. The vote will take place on Wednesday.

On that day, many Christians will be found at a prayer vigil in Old Palace Yard near the entrance to the House of Lords. We need to be praying with them, because it is going to take a miracle to keep this law from passing.
We must also realize that we are going to face this same kind of persecution if same-sex “marriage” is legalized in America. It’s already begun, especially in Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was imposed by judges. For instance, a federal judge recently decreed that Christian parents cannot opt their kindergarteners out of public school classes that normalize homosexuality. And last year Catholic Charities shut down its adoption agencies rather than agree to send innocent children into homosexual homes.

This is why we desperately need to be vigilant—especially our religious liberty groups. This is why, for example, we need to pass a federal marriage amendment. If we do nothing, we are going to be facing the same future that Christians in the UK are facing: a future in which preaching the truths of the Gospel is against the law.

The New Christian Persecution
John R. Houk
© March 23, 2007
Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief: Outlawing Conscience
From BreakPoint®, March 20, 2007, Copyright 2007, Prison Fellowship Ministries. All rights reserved.
Copyright © The Christian Post

Win in Iraq or Lose at Home

This little video is produced by MoveAmericaForward. It is a message with foresight. Pulling out of Iraq with unfinished business will embolden terrorism on our Homeland, not prevent it.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

You’re Fired

I am a bit sketchy as to why the Bush Administration fired the U.S. Attorneys. I was listening to Feinstein on Fox News saying her Committee was going to initiate a witch hunt (well she didn’t exactly say that) to find the President’s motive.

Frankly my observation over the past couple of years are that U.S. Attorney Generals have been perpetuating a Left Wing agenda and ignoring what President Bush has stood for as a Conservative. Bush should just come out and tell the Democrats why these U.S. Attorneys were fired. I could care less if the reason is found offensive to Democrats; the tenure of a U.S. Attorney is at the whim of the President. It is not a Civil Service job.

On the other hand if these U.S. Attorneys were fired to prevent legitimate investigations into crime (e.g. the Ramos/Compean cover-up), then I may have an agreement with the Democrats.

Let us see how this plays out.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Islamofascists Battle Amongst Themselves in Waziristan

Red: Taliban Control. Yellow: Threatened Islamist Control.

Waziristan is a region in Pakistan. The Pakistani government of Pervez Musharraf signed an Accord not to long ago with Islamofascist warlords of the area. In essence Musharraf gave governing autonomy to the Terrorist elements of the Taliban and al Qaeda residing in Waziristan while Pakistan maintains a dubious official sovereignty.

Now that you are caught up, check this out. The Islamofascists in Waziristan are fighting an internecine war among themselves over local issues of who is in charge of what. The solidarity of radical Mohammedanism takes a back seat to the bread and butter of what makes the locals happy.

Now isn’t that a piece of hypocrisy the Mainstream Media rarely publishes. Radical Mohammedanism’s greatest complaint against the West is the potential influence of immoral culture (actually they have a point there); thus Islamofascists berate Democracy as a mode to perpetuate immorality (a point they DO NOT have).

Yet when it comes down to controlling food, probable illegal drugs for profit and the needs and support of various locals; then typical Machiavellian politics reigns supreme in perpetuating means to justify murderous ends amongst themselves.

The Fourth Rail has an article written by Bill Roggio regarding the Religion of Peace in Waziristan - READ IT.

Related material also by Bill Roggio is


With all the Democratic Party grand standing against the American Troop Surge and the War in Iraq and the collusion of the Mainstream Media (MSM), you might be surprised to learn that the NEW General in town is reporting huge successes.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Dhimmitude or How Western Muslims Use Western Laws

There is more and more evidence coming forth that illustrates what the jihadists cannot do by violence, Islamists will do with Western Laws to protect their Fifth Column agenda to mohammedanize the West and America.

I know you are thinking I am just being an Islamophobe and you are correct. The problem is Islamophobia is not racism as the many Islamist organizations in America, Canada and Europe would have you believe. Radical Islam is not a race. Certainly Radical Islamists have a high profile of Arab and Middle Eastern looking fellows; however Mohammedanism’s largest population is in Indonesia. That is Asian. A huge segment of Mohammedans have an Indian ancestry which is currently split up between Pakistan, Bangladesh and large segments of India.

So let us re-think this Islamophobe business is a racist business. Radical Islam is more akin to political theory radicalized by an injection of religion. It is much like what the Soviets and Red Chinese did at the beginning of their revolutionary regimes. They propagandize the population under their influence to worship a cultic status. In communism it was Karl Marx, Lennon, Mao and the State. In Mohammedanism it is the medieval acts of Mohammed and his blood lust for a cohesive empire. The empire initiated by Mohammed exercised a combination of brutality and propaganda to transform the conquered into passionate believers of the old Arab moon deity Allah.

With money from Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Shi’ite Iran,
migrating Mohammedans to America and Europe are exploiting laws of freedom and liberty reverse assimilating the cultures they have moved to. WAKE UP!

Monday, March 19, 2007

Blog Break

I am extremely sick. Or as they say in Oklahoma: I am real bad sick.

I probably will be taking a day or two off from blogging.

I know the Liberals will miss me, I hope the Conservatives will miss me as well.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Potentially Dark Secrets of Marilyn Monroe’s Death

Anna Nicole Smith has died under dubious circumstances. Who knows when those circumstances will be enlightened?

It is also known that Smith modeled her look after Marilyn Monroe. Guess what? Monroe’s death was officially ruled a suicide,
however the conspiracy that could shake America decades later is in the making.

“Now a Los Angeles-based Australian writer and director, Philippe Mora, has uncovered an FBI document that throws up a chilling new scenario.”

I smell Hollywood; nonetheless if Mora’s investigation pans out, one of the most heinous murder crimes conspired by the rich and famous will come to light. The twisted web includes Robert Kennedy (assassinated Presidential aspirant), actor Peter Lawford, Monroe’s psychiatrist and more.

Now this would be a conspiracy theory that might make people forget the JFK conspiracy theory.

Muslim Wolves Prepare for War

The EU’s Solana has pretty much given the go ahead to Syria to seek the return of the Golan Heights which they lost in a failed invasion of Israel. The Golan Heights have been a huge strategical buffer utilized by Israel to keep the crazy Assad dynasty at bay.

Carolyn Glick
has written an essay showing the last time a Western power showed disinterest toward inter-Arab relations, Kuwait was invaded by Saddam Hussein. Glick senses that Solana’s statement is encouragement for Syria to do the same thing with Israel.

Does it seem far fetched? Hardly! With the mutual back slapping between Iran and Syria as well as the public displays mutual defense memos and such, Syria indeed seems to be just waiting for the best timing to take on Israel.

The crisis in Israel’s corner is the incompetent leadership provided by the Olmert team. The Prime Ministry of Olmert is the most confused and weak leadership Israel has had – EVER.

The desert wolf is circling the prey to take yet one more shot at obliterating Jews in their homeland.

Northern Virginiastan

I don’t know if American authorities are trying to keep Americans calm or if they are in complete denial about the radical Islamist problem in America. The Wahhabis of the Sunni and the radical Shi’ites publicly evoke anti-American rhetoric. In private there is substantial evidential inference that radical Islamists associate with their foreign counterparts or are actually planning acts of brutality themselves.


Here is an interesting point of view that the Christian Right and Left Wing anti-war groups may have a hard time in grasping.

Gandhi’s way is not America’s way.” This is the title of a short essay by a potential Presidential candidate Fred Thompson. Thompson’s point is stunningly accurate but may be too politically incorrect to swallow. Let us see if the MSM grasp the essence of Thompson’s article and attempt to crucify him or hold off seeing if he will be a viable candidate.

Here is a teaser to read the article: Gandhi wrote an open letter to the British to surrender to Nazi Germany.

Conservatives and RINOS in 2008

J. B. Williams has written an article that is worthy of examination by Conservatives. The essence of Williams’ theme is most Conservatives are Republicans but not all Republicans are Conservative. If the Conservative base of the Republican Party chooses a Presidential candidate in the belief of electability, then the Conservatives have diluted their ideology to defeat Leftist Democrats.

Williams posits if a Left oriented Republican is elected, what is the difference from electing a Leftist Democratic President? A Left thinking Republican would appoint liberal judges to the Judiciary, accommodate the homosexual agenda, look the other way when Christophobe secular humanist delete more and more Christianity from the American community and on and on.

The reason Williams’ essay caught my eye is that I was leaning toward looking at a Republican that could beat a Democrat at all costs. I was leaning to the thinking a RINO was better than Leftist Democratic Party hegemony.

Now I am leaning to the thought that a non-Conservative Republican President is a Democrat in sheep’s clothing.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Christophobic MSM Wants Pace Crucified

Here we are with the Mainstream Media joining the immoral homosexual lobby (or as Ann Coulter would say – faggots) to force an American General out of his military position for expressing his free speech rights.

This is the powerful agenda of the homosexuals and the Liberals to legitimize immoral behavior and crucify any person that disagrees with the agenda as a hate monger.

The truth is homosexuals are as Christophobic as Bible believing Christians are homophobic. The difference being the Word of God trumps humanism whether homosexuals or liberals like it or not.


Liberal media pushing for Gen. Pace’s forced resignation
By Cliff Kincaid

March 15, 2007
American Family Association

The Washington Post claims in an editorial that there is an "uproar" over General Peter Pace expressing his view that homosexuality is immoral. (web site) This is another manufactured "scandal" designed to put a top official, in this case the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, in a bad light. This "uproar," such as it is, has come from papers like the Post and homosexual rights activists. It is an effort at intimidation, pure and simple, and thought control.

At this point in the media-generated controversy, Pace has not apologized but has been forced to say he should not have emphasized his own personal views on the subject. Some stories are saying Pace has expressed "regret" or "mild regret."

Whatever the outcome, and it is still possible that Pace could be forced to resign over this, the message has been sent: do not offend the powerful homosexual lobby, including the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association (NLGJA), which on Thursday, March 15, will be sponsoring a New York benefit hosted by ABC News reporter Brian Ross. The "special guests" will include Natalie Morales and Meredith Vieira of NBC News, Martha MacCallum of Fox News, Soledad O'Brien of CNN, and Robert Lipsyte of the New York Times. Corporate sponsors include ABC News, CNN, and NBC Universal.

As the NLGJA website puts it, the event is a "special evening for a great cause," bringing together "a glittering collection of some of the brightest names in media, journalism and entertainment."

Is it any surprise that the media have made the Pace comments on homosexuality into a national controversy, even scandal? The national media and the homosexual rights movement seem to be one and the same. But that's a story that news consumers aren't being told.

Leading the charge, the Post found Pace guilty of making "public expressions of intolerance." The subheadline of the editorial was, "Gen. Peter Pace denounces gays and lesbians who are busy defending their country." But he said nothing of the kind, and the paper knows it. The deceitful editorial is another attempt to intimidate people into not expressing opinions that contradict the politically correct views of the radical left. The Post, which runs announcements of homosexual "weddings," will not be content until homosexuality is celebrated in the military and the schools as just another alternative lifestyle. (web site) Pedophilia, of course, can be defined by its apologists in that manner.

Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth points out that the Pace view is consistent with the writings of the Apostle Paul, who denounced homosexuality as an unrighteous behavior that would keep someone out of heaven. (web site) So if the Post finds what Pace said objectionable, it is also taking issue with the traditional Christian view of homosexuality. Of course, it's easier for the Post to write an editorial denouncing Pace than attacking a disciple of Jesus Christ who doesn't serve in the Bush Administration.

This controversy says more about the Post than it does about Pace. It shows that a major American newspaper has become a virtual house organ of the gay rights movement. And it shows that this paper will not hesitate to use its power and influence to try to intimidate those with different views. It is the Post, in fact, which is being intolerant.

I was among those who strongly criticized Ann Coulter for using "faggot," a disparaging term about homosexuals. What Pace did, by contrast, was simply express his personal view, in an interview with the Chicago Tribune, that homosexual conduct is immoral. (web site) The Post editorial said in passing that Pace was "entitled to his opinions, of course," but went on to complain about the impact of his words. What the paper is really saying is that he is entitled to his opinions but he should keep them to himself. Frankly, the paper wants him to shut up.

We are living in strange times when smoking is considered a serious danger to one's health, and something which cannot be tolerated in most areas of public life, but a lifestyle linked to a raging epidemic of disease and death is regarded as a civil right that must not be criticized and even deserves to be celebrated.

The Post, in its editorial, carefully avoided the issue of what exactly male homosexuals do. Howard Phillips of the Conservative Caucus calls them "anal-sex practitioners." That may sound shocking to some, but it is a fact nonetheless. The Post omitted this information in order to make the case that open and out-of-the-closet homosexuals should serve in the U.S. military. We don't want to think about such things but we must as long as we have a media establishment, led by the Post, which wants public approval for engaging in such practices in the U.S. military and other areas of society.

When the Post devotes some of its precious and limited editorial space to denouncing Pace for his personal view of homosexuality, this is a big deal. You can be sure the paper isn't doing this just to be fashionable. It seems obvious that one or more editorial writers on the paper are card-carrying members of the homosexual rights movement or sympathizers. In this connection, it is interesting to note that the paper has made financial contributions to the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association. (web site)

Also consider the fact that the Post ran a February 24 editorial about the "Death of a Gay Rights Pioneer" by the name of Barbara Gittings. (web site) I have been writing about the homosexual rights movement for over 20 years and I had never heard of her before. It turns out, according to the Post, that she is the "Founding Mother" of the homosexual rights movement, a lesbian who led the fight to bring more homosexual propaganda into the public libraries. As long as we are on the subject, Post readers are also entitled to know that the founding father of the gay rights movement was Harry Hay, a communist who supported pedophilia as just another "sexual orientation." (web site) But don't look for any investigations by Post Watergate reporter Bob Woodward into the sordid history of the homosexual rights movement.

The Post is one strange paper. On some matters, such as its treatment of the Joe Wilson/Scooter Libby affair, the Post can break through the liberal mold and offer straightforward and well-researched editorials. But on the issue of homosexual rights, the paper is strident to the point of sounding like the Washington (Gay) Blade, the local homosexual paper.

The Post has not yet called for Pace's resignation. But that could come if this media-generated "uproar" continues. Those who believe in freedom of speech, traditional values, and fair and responsible journalism should stand solidly behind Pace.


Christophobic MSM Wants Pace Crucified
John R. Houk
© March 16, 2007

Liberal media pushing for Gen. Pace’s forced resignation

Cliff Kincaid is editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at

Somebody is a Liar in Plamegate

Valerie Plame’s testimony contradicts CIA and government assertions that Plame indeed sent husband Joe Wilson to Niger. Plame denies the assertion vehemently.

So what does that mean? Both Plame and Wilson are liars or the CIA, State Department and White House are liars.

More resources corroborate the CIA, State Department and White House than Plame and Wilson. That would mean Plame has the gall to lie on record at a House hearing.

And AGAIN I raise the question: Why did not Special
Persecutor Prosecutor Fitzgerald fulfill his mandate and indict Richard Armitage?

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Hezbollah Will Walk into Israel Without Armed Struggle

So you think that Middle Eastern media outlets and Mohammedan organizations (i.e. murdering Islamofascist terrorists) are moderate and peaceful? Well think again!

Abdallah Safialdeen representing Hezbollah in Iran claims that as soon as the US military leaves Iraq, Hezbollah will waltz into “Palestine” (i.e. the Land Israel). The Jews will either leave with America or be obliterated.


In the post "Is There a Bush Agenda Obscured from both Democrats and Republicans," I have expressed my growing disillusionment of President Bush. The early Bush Agenda was awesome, however in the latter part of the Bush Administration he appears to be collapsing to the pressure of the Democrats. Most importantly there seems to be an emerging nefarious agenda that even Conservative Republicans would be appalled if it pans out to be true.

This is talk of some kind of North American Union, i.e. a union of Canada, America and Mexico as one confederated nation. This end the Founding Fathers dream of a Constitutional America, a new Constitution would have to come into existence to merge the cultures of Canada, America and Mexico.

Again if true, it would be a huge betrayal of America’s Conservative Movement. If such an agenda is proven, it would doom America to supporting the Leftist Democratic Party. If the Democrats gain power it would be the end of America as the Founding Father’s envisioned it. If this North American Union thing is true and wins out, it too would end the foundation of the Founding Father’s vision of America.

All this speculation makes Richard Viguerie’s an important source to read. Below is one of the emails I have received from


Richard Viguerie’s Response to New York Times Poll on the Fate of the Republican Party

Richard A. Viguerie
9625 Surveyor Court, Suite 400Manassas, Virginia 20110

CONTACT: Margaret Wright, 703) 396-6974 Nancy Bakersmith, (703) 209-6190 or
(571) 292-1817
FOR RELEASE March 14, 2007

(Manassas, Virginia) In response to the March 13 New York Times article,
“GOP Voters Voice Anxieties on Party’s Fate,” which reported on the results of a national poll indicating that Republican voters are not satisfied with the choice of candidates seeking the presidential nomination, Richard A Viguerie, author of Conservatives Betrayed: How George W. Bush and Other Big Government Republicans Hijacked the Conservative Cause, released the following statement:

“There is very little in this poll that would lead the Bush Administration and Republicans in Congress to think they are on the right track. It showed that just 34 percent of all respondents had a favorable view of the Republican Party and, by a 20-point margin, voters would favor a Democrat over a Republican for president.

“If the present situation continues and America is still fighting in Iraq next year, Republicans will be swept out of office all the way from the courthouse to the White House.

“As a result, Republican primary votes are looking for--but have not found--an effective conservative leader. Over the last 10 years, no Republican has stepped forward as a conservative leader. While all of the GOP presidential candidates but Rudy Guiliani claim to be a conservative, none of them have consistently spoken out against the liberal excesses of President Bush and the former Republican-controlled Congress, with the exception of Ron Paul.

“It appears most of the GOP presidential candidates believed that, to get along, they had to go along with the Republican Establishment. While some of the candidates are better than others, none of them have interested, much less excited, even a significant minority of conservatives. It’s possible one of the existing candidates will catch fire with conservatives but not likely.

“President Bush’s legacy may be to preside over the GOP’s demise. In the 1993 elections in Canada, the ruling Progressive Conservative Party suffered a disastrous defeat and was left with a grand total of only two seats in the House of Commons. The party never again won more than 20 seats, out of 308, and officially dissolved in 2003. However, it was replaced by the new Conservative Party of Canada, which is led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

“If the Republican Party continues on its present course, it will follow in the footsteps of the Progressive Conservative Party in Canada. Then, perhaps out of the ashes of the George W. Bush GOP, a new phoenix will arise to lead the U.S. in a conservative direction.”

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

The Truth About Muhammad

Robert Spencer tells the truth of Mohammed, the devil of the Middle East.

American-Mohammedanism and Terrorism Support Agenda

Mohammedan organizations in America are doing the same thing that dead Yasser Arafat used to do; i.e. say one something tickling to the joy of the Western mind then saying another thing to his cadre of fellow terrorists. Organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) are following the Arafat principle plus an added agenda. These terror supporting American organizations are attempting to intimidate loyal Americans that expose the nature of these treasonous Mohammedan-Americans.

They are using the American system of litigation as the intimidation tool.

Muslims terrorist front groups like MPAC are bringing out the big guns, and threatening infidels who stand up to their harassments and threats. Fortunately Steve Emerson is not going to be the good dhimmi these terrorists demand. Hopefully our Congress will wake up and see this terrorist cult for what it is = a threat to our civilization. (Pedestrian Infidel)

Tuesday, March 13, 2007


There is the emerging appearance of a Watergate type scandal that may link to the White House. Is the scandal related to the Iraq War? Only in an off hand way is the answer.

The scandal has to do with the mysterious choice to allow prosecution of people who are obviously framed or set up to take a fall.

The first to come mind is
Scooter Libby. The purpose for his prosecution is ludicrous and had zero to do with leaking Valerie Plame’s name to the Mainstream Media (MSM). Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald had a mandate to go after the person who leaked a useless CIA agent (Plame) to the MSM. Fitzgerald did not go after the person who he did know (viz. Richard Armitage); rather he went after a person that could embarrass the Bush Administration (Libby). Libby had zero to do with the leak.

The next judicial mystery has to do with
Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. At first I believed this was just Left Wing bureaucracy persecuting the Conservative agenda to favor spread favor to the benefit of the Democrat Party. These prosecutions are beginning to take on the image of President Bush having a hand in the prosecutions. He has not spoken publicly of the outrageous actions. Bush’s power base is calling for Executive Pardons for Libby, Ramos and Compean; however it is as if Bush has ear plugs and blinders on.

Is there a secret agenda that even the Republican base would be horrified with? Could the unthinkable be correct put forth about Bush? Is the Bush agenda more than a Conservative agenda? Will Bush prove this an insane speculation and
step up with the stones to pardon Ramos, Compean and Libby?

Monday, March 12, 2007

The St. Petersburg Declaration and CAIR

A little summit has taken place in St. Petersburg, FL by people with a Mohammedan heritage. Granted the attendees of the Conference have left Mohammedanism because they became enlightened to the brutality and intolerance that modern Mohammedanism has achieved in the 21st Century.

The ex-Mohammedans called the Conference the Secular Islam Summit. The result of this Summit was a manifesto entitled “
The St. Petersburg Declaration.” I am betting this has not been a forefront issue of the Mainstream Media (MSM). On the other hand the Declaration caught the attention of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). Instead of embracing the moderate aspects of “The St. Petersburg Declaration,” CAIR has rejected it on grounds that the Summit was financed by a cabal of neoconservatives. This is coming from the Mohammedan organization that is the self-proclaimed arbiter of moderate Mohammedanism in America and the protector of Mohammedan civil rights.

Here are Robert Spencer’s thoughts of the continuing Mohammedan intolerance by CAIR:

Hanson: World must act to stop Ahmadinejad

Victor Davis Hanson is an immanent military historian that the West would do well to listen too. In a recent interview with The Jerusalem Post Hanson talks about why it is nutty to allow Iran to acquire nuclear energy that could be used for weapons grade enriched uranium. READ IT HERE.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

American Students Could Face Charges for Desecrating Allah

What is it you think of when you see Mohammedans in America and abroad burning the United States flag? Most Americans would not be pleased but our heritage would view our flag desecration as freedom of speech or expression. Some Americans further down the Right side of the scale may even react with hostile anger. Some Americans further down the Left side of the scale may actually cheer the Mohammedans along (because Lefties tend to be America haters).

Recently some College Republicans at San Francisco State University stepped on the flags of Hezbollah and Hamas at a college function. These Republican kids did not burn Mohammed in effigy or even the flags of terrorist organizations that are not even sovereign nations; they merely stepped on the flags.

A Mohammedan placed an official complaint that the act of stepping on Hezbollah and Hamas flags was an insult to Allah. Further the complaint stipulates that the young Republicans were inciting violence and hate crime by “stepping” on the Hezbollah and Hamas flags.

SFSU is actually investigating the matter and considering punishment. Can you believe it?! Mohammedans protest in the most inciteful of manners even on American soil
yet stepping on the flags of the enemies of America is a hate crime, it is incredulous!