Showing posts with label Wahhabi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wahhabi. Show all posts

Monday, September 07, 2009

Resolve 9/11



John R. Houk
© September 7, 2009


September 11, 2001 is the date that Islam became more than just another religion that was growing rapidly in the world. Islam became the religion in which some people took the literal past as the will of Allah for the world in the twenty-first century. Thus the proponents of what is commonly called “radical Islam” to differentiate from “moderate Islam” seemed to become the mouthpiece of Islam to the American public.

Al Qaeda became a household word in America soon after 9/11. The recognized leadership figure of Al Qaeda is Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden’s ideology of Islam is from the mold of Wahhabi (Salafist) Islam the dominant version of Islam in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is one of the wealthiest oil nations in the world. Saudi adherents of Wahhabi have been the recipients of that wealth and have used it to finance the Wahhabi Islamic version world wide including the United States of America.

Wahhabi Islam is very closely related to the same radical Islamic ideology birthed in Egypt known to the West mostly as the Muslim Brotherhood but also is known as Ikhwan.

The murdering Islamic Supremacist Palestinian-Arab organization known as Hamas is essentially an autonomous wing of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza (Gazastan or Hamastan). As we know Hamas wishes to be the lead Muslim terrorist organization superseding Fatah and the Palestine Authority (PA) representing Arabs that call themselves Palestinians in the creation of a Palestinian State that would dismember Israel and provide the next Jewish Holocaust.

The Muslim Brotherhood is highly connected to many American-Muslim organizations of note who claim to represent some aspect or another of “Moderate Islam” in America. Consequently Islamic terrorists Hamas also extend a reach into America as the Holy Land Foundation convictions (along with unindicted co-conspirators) proved.

Despite this interconnected web of evil which is to this day extending its hand on American soil, the American Left is hyper-concerned that Freedom of Religion should prevent scrutiny of the same Islamic ideology that inspired the 9/11 attacks that killed more Americans in our homeland than the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

President Roosevelt announced to America that December 7, 1941 would be a day that will live in infamy. That day of infamy led to a war strategy that the Nazis of Germany and Imperialist Japanese could only make peace by a total and absolute surrender to the Allies that were at war with this axis of evil.

Here we are today on the cusp of nearly eight years of continuous fighting in Afghanistan and there is no unconditional surrender. For that matter there is not a hint of peace overtures either from the Taliban or al Qaeda toward ending the conflict. Indeed the radical Islam of these groups has taken on the nature of suicide before surrender.

Unfortunately the times they have changed from a strategy of win at all costs to a strategy limited by Western International Political Correctness. I am thinking a general like George Patton would have taken the mountainous Bora Bora cave system between Afghanistan and Pakistan and would have immersed the area in carnage (including the collateral damage of Taliban sympathetic civilians) until there was surrender or nothing left to surrender.

Twenty-first century Political Correctness would look upon such a victory in horror because of the huge toll of human lives lost. And yet it was the strategy of forcing unconditional surrenders in World War II that led to the devastating bombing of Dresden, Germany as well as the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. I am guessing more civilians died in those actions than Nazi or Japanese military personnel. Even so Germany and Japan provided the unconditional surrender to sue for peace.

I am also guessing if the WWII drive to win at all costs was executed today, the chasing of the Taliban and al Qaeda would have ended years ago.

Since the polls concerning the Iraq War theatre brought down Republican dominance in Congress and vilified President G. W. Bush, I am guessing President Barack Hussein Obama is watching the polls of American attitudes toward the Afghanistan War Theatre.

Since President BHO is the Prince of Appeasement and Political Correctness, I wonder what the Obama Administration strategy will be to end America’s military action in the Afghanistan War Theatre. Do you wonder as well?

JRH 9/7/09 (Hat Tip: MAF)
*****************************
What Constitutes Victory in Afghanistan

By Kyle W. Nevins and Joseph R. Nevins
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Washington Post


Polls show that public support for the war in Afghanistan is eroding. Noted conservative columnist George F. Will counsels that it is "time to get out of Afghanistan." Will and others question our purpose there and point to a lack of clear strategy for victory or even clear measures of success.

For some, the conflict in Afghanistan has elicited memories of Vietnam -- a war with no clear battlefront and no clear end. But while the threat in Vietnam was hypothetical, the threat in Afghanistan is real: The Taliban did provide haven for terrorists who attacked America on American soil. And that attack on American soil claimed more lives than were lost at Pearl Harbor.

We are not professionals in the business of influencing public opinion. We write as the brother and father of a Marine infantry officer serving on the front lines of Helmand province in Afghanistan. Patrick was only 16 years old on Sept. 11, 2001. Yet he knew then that he would join the effort to protect our nation from another attack. He is now exactly where he wants to be: protecting our country from further violence in a theater he absolutely believes enabled the events of Sept. 11.

To end the war in Afghanistan is, in a sense, to attempt to return us to a state preceding the Sept. 11 attacks. Do we know for sure that military action in Afghanistan has prevented another attack? Of course not. But we do know that the Taliban in Afghanistan did provide the means for the horrendous carnage of that day. The 2001 attacks changed our world. There is no turning back. Like it or not, Americans must be prepared for a long war if we mean to protect our peace and our way of life.

To use an analogy from medical practice, we are fighting a chronic disease -- one with little hope of eradication. Our goal must be to control the threat even if it cannot be eliminated. In many respects, our plight following Sept. 11 closely parallels the experience of Israel of the past 61 years, a continuing threat that is unlikely to go away.

So, how do we measure our success in Afghanistan? We measure success as the continuation of our American way of life, day by day, and as going one more day without an attack at home. It is incumbent upon our politicians, in particular the Obama administration, to articulate this clearly to the public. The president must provide leadership and not simply react to polls.

We know that many of the men and women serving in Afghanistan do so because of Sept. 11 -- a nearly universal personal response not unlike the national response to Pearl Harbor. While their role in this conflict is a source of great anxiety to their families, for whom a sniper's bullet, an improvised explosive device or a grenade could spell disaster at any moment, this anxiety is overwhelmed by the pride in individuals who sacrifice daily for a cause that most Americans take for granted. Each day that goes by quietly on American soil is our measure of their success in Afghanistan.

________________________

Resolve 9/11
John R. Houk
© September 7, 2009
__________________
What Constitutes Victory in Afghanistan
Kyle Nevins is director of floor operations for the House Republican whip. Joseph Nevins is the Barbara Levine professor of breast cancer genomics and director of the Center for Applied Genomics and Technology at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C.
© Copyright 1996-2009 The Washington Post Company

Monday, September 15, 2008

Will Saudi Justice find its Way into American Justice?


The cradle of Islam is Mecca. Mecca is governed and protected by the House of Saud. The House of Saud is the royal family that reigns and rules Saudi Arabia. The House of Saud is entwined with a movement founded by Muhammad ibn Abd al Wahhab; thus the influence of violence in Islam.

The House of Saud is committed in spreading Wahhabi teaching through the entire globe using oil wealth to facilitate Wahhabi education and the building of Mosques both in the Mohammedan Middle East and in the West. Wahhabism is the foundation of the murdering Islamic terrorists such as al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hamas and related Islamic/Islamist violent groups. You can guess that Wahhabism is very influential among Mohammedans due to the oil money of the Saudis used to propagate the death cult globally. Reliable sources put at 80% of Mosques in America are Wahhabi supported or funded. Check out this quote from testimony given before the U.S. Senate in 2003:

At the present time, Shia and other non-Wahhabi Muslim community leaders estimate that 80 percent of American mosques are under Wahhabi control. This does not mean 80 percent of American Muslims support Wahhabism, although the main Wahhabi ideological agency in America, the so-called Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has claimed that some 70 percent of American Muslims want Wahhabi teaching in their mosques.1This is a claim we consider unfounded. (Steven Schwartz)


If this was so in 2003, consider or imagine the teaching of Mohammedanism in America today. This would mean organizations such as and similar to CAIR that claim they represent the majority of Muslim/Americans are not as moderate and peaceful as they would have you believe.

The House of Saud, the ruling family of Saudi Arabia is of the Sunnis. Sunnis represent roughly 90% (Let’s say 85% to
90% depending who you read) of those that call themselves Muslims (Mohammedans). The Shia sect represents roughly the other 10% (and of the Shias the West could view that as splintered as well). Of the Shia sects the largest appears to be the Twelvers or Jaafaris (same sect different names). The Twelvers can be seen in the Ayatollahs of Iran. The Ayatollahs appear to me to be as repressive and violent as the Wahhabi Sunnis.

I pray OIL is the only reason that the American government has cultivated a friendly alliance with Saudi Arabia. Even though the Saudi government may express American appreciation to the West publically, its political infrastructure continuously denounces American democracy and society.

Transnational politics regardless of culture or dominant faith is as Machiavellian (Long thoughts and short definition) today as it ever has been. The Machiavellianism may be more sophisticated; however politics is still the means justify the ends as a methodology to plan the ends.

Now that you read this far let me go out on a limb to summarize Saudi Arabia:

    The Saudi nation/Monarchy is a repressive despotic government which uses violent Wahhabi Sharia Law as the essence of its rule of law.


Saudi adjudicated crimes may be judged as capital or maiming decisions. Saudi considered crimes in America may not even be a crime or if it is the punishment would probably be minimal especially for first time offenders.

Check this out from Dhimmi Watch:

… it's permissible to kill broadcasters of "immoral" television, but a judge must order it

… An update on this story. "Only courts can order death for ‘depraved' TV bosses," from Agence France-Presse, September 14:

    RIYADH - A top Saudi cleric and judge sought Sunday to tone down a controversial religious edict sanctioning the killing of owners of television stations that air "debauchery," saying they could only be put to death after a judicial process.

    If the owners of television networks that air "depravation and debauchery" are not deterred by lesser punishments, they would be referred to justice which issues its rulings in keeping with the laws in force in the kingdom, Sheikh Saleh al-Luhaidan told state-run Saudi television.

    "They may be killed through a judicial (ruling)," he added.

    Luhaidan, who heads the Supreme Judicial Council, the highest judicial body in ultra-conservative Muslim Saudi Arabia, sparked controversy by saying on the radio that the owners of television networks broadcasting "immoral" programmes may be killed.


But: Define "immoral." I Love Lucy? Little House on the Prairie? CBS Evening News with Katie Couric?

    It is lawful to kill... the apostles of depravation... if their evil cannot be easily removed through simple sanctions," Luhaidan said, according to excerpts of the remarks broadcast on Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya satellite television on Friday.

    Luhaidan acknowledged on Sunday that his remarks had caused an outcry, but put that down to what he said was a wrong interpretation of his views, insisting he had said that death would be through a judicial process.

    Saudi Arabia applies a rigorous doctrine of Sunni Islam known as Wahhabism, and its Islamic courts hand down death sentences for a series of offences including murder, rape and drug trafficking.

    The oil-rich kingdom's grand mufti recently issued a fatwa, or religious edict, describing
    a highly popular television soap
    as "un-Islamic," but Luhaidan's remarks went further than any made by hardline clerics against entertainment programmes seen as immoral.


This is the kind of teaching that is being financed by oil rich Saudi Wahhabists in Muslim-American Mosques.

Does Freedom of Religion mean that Americans look the other way while such violent laws are promoted in 70% of Muslim-American Mosques?

Wahhabism may not be the dominant form of Mohammedanism globally but it has the money and the influence.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

The Final Jihad


Here is an awesome YouTube video that is a quick lesson on Jihad. I found it at American Infidel. The video points out that transnational terrorists and psycho nations did not begin the current War on Terror at 9/11. The origins actually can be found at Mohammedanism’s inception. Check out the video.

(Hat tip to
Humbled Infidel)


Thursday, November 22, 2007

Be Thankful You Are NOT a Woman Living in Saudi Arabia


Be thankful you live in America where victims are not treated as criminals and criminals receive punishment based on the rule of law rather than the whim of a Muslim judge that deliberates according to the Quran – a document of pain, suffering and murder.

In Saudi Arabia the
religion of peace has convicted a nineteen year old for the crime of being a victim to a gang rape. Her original judgment was ninety lashes; however at her appeal the judgment was increased to two-hundred lashes because her supporters supplicated to the media to get her story out to the world.

I believe in Freedom of Conscience to practice or not practice any religion; however the Scriptures of Islam (Quran, Hadith, Sunna, etc) makes Islam on paper a death cult. I am certain most Mohammedans have extracted any words of peace and justice from these Scriptures; however this does not nullify the violent oriented Scriptures.

It is the violent and absurdly unjust Scriptures that Sunni and Shia Islamists adhere to.

Saudi Arabia is an oxymoron in geopolitics. Saudi Arabia as ruled by the House of Saud has become a valuable ally with America on the War on Terror and yet the school of thought that dominates Saudi Arabia is Wahhabi. It is this Wahhabism that Sunni Islamists use to justify their Jihad of terrorism against non-Mohammedans and cruel judgments as interpreted by Sharia Law.

America cannot afford to have Wahhabi Mohammedans leak into America. The initial reaction of an ingrained Freedom of Religion will allow Wahhabists to develop into a fifth column to undermine the very foundations of America.

Thanksgiving will be labeled as a discriminatory holiday for Christians violating and offending Wahhabi Mohammedans who pray toward Mecca. To be Politically Correct Mohammedan ethics could be forced to be taught our children in relating about being Thankful to God the Christians experienced on a rare occasion in which Native Americans providentially aided Christian Pilgrim survive a harsh winter. Read the Presidential Proclamations concerning Thanksgiving until Congress made the day an official American Holiday.
Thanksgiving is all about Thanks to God which included the exchange of Christian Giving between people who were natural enemies.

The Mohammedan concept of Thanksgiving is convert or die.

JRH




Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Saudi Arabia in Perspective: “The Saudi Hillbillies”


Here is some good ole’ Kafir humor at the expense of Wahhabi Sunni Saudis brought to you by Bill Levinson and Israpundit.

JRH 11/7/07
*****************************


Saudi Arabia in Perspective: “The Saudi Hillbillies”

Bill Levinson
November 4, 2007
Israpundit

    Come and listen to a story about a man named FahdA poor camel driver, barely kept his family fed,Then one day he was shootin at some Jews,And up through the ground came a bubblin’ crude.

    Oil that is. Black gold. Saudi tea.

    Well the first thing you know ol’ Fahd’s a millionaire,Mullahs said Fahd move away from thereSaid Riyadh is the place you ought to beSo they loaded up the camel and they moved to Saudi.

    Arabia, that is.Big mosques. Wahabisim.

    Well now its time to say good-bye to Fahd and all his wives.And you kafirs and infidels should be glad to have your lives.You’re all invited back again to this localityTo have a heapin helpin of their hospitality


Saudi that is. Pay your dhimmi tax. Take your crosses off. Leave your Bibles behind, y’hear?

The point of this exercise is to demonstrate that Saudi Arabia, like the Beverly Hillbillies, is where it is in the world only because it had the good fortune to be sitting on top of a huge supply of oil–not because its people are capable of building anything more complicated than a gallows or a whipping post. In contrast, Israel has a higher per capita income despite its lack of natural resources. This is because people who read books tend to be a lot smarter than those who burn them.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

If Dreams Could Come True …


The Arms deal concluded between the Bush Administration and the Saudi Monarchy is a disaster waiting to happen in the future. I lament that I have not followed the nuts and bolts of the issue and so I do not know if Congress has to okay the deal. If Congress has to okay the deal let us hope this Democratic controlled Congress has enough brains to indeed prevent the deal from following through.

Walid Phares has an idealistic alternative to the Saudi Arms deal. It is extremely idealistic because it boils to down to one essence: The Saudi Monarchy switching up on the Wahhabi teaching that disseminates from the area and setting new agendas to execute Middle Eastern stability by confronting the Shi’ite radicals of Iran with a new ideology that will hopefully destabilize the Mullah controlled government. The Phares idealism is directed to anti-Khomeini revolutionary Shi’ites, Kurds and Arabs living in Iran. Phares admits (at least to himself) that there is no real idea of whom or where to find this element in Iranian society.

Frankly Mohammedan hate is too entrenched for Phares’ vision to be realized at this moment in time. Something catastrophic would have to happen to the Saudi Monarchy to change its paradigm or face an alternative of the Monarchy imminent demise.

I suspect such a catastrophe would be too late to successfully implement the Phares idealism.

However I do think the Phares idealism can be applied to Mohammedans living in the West. It would take courage to evade the Politically Correct and ban Wahhabi and Khomeinist-Shi’ite literature as teaching tools in the West. I am not saying to have a good ol’ fashion Nazi-Communist-Big Brother book burning, rather if it is taught in schools as hate it is time to prohibit the teaching. I am uncertain of have how to prevent teaching hate in American madrassas and Mosques without infringing on Free Speech, but maybe the government bureaucracies can get some ideas from the ACLU who have effectively stopped the teaching of Christian perspectives in public schools.

Monday, July 02, 2007

The New American Fifth Column


Many of the people in America (say) under thirty years of age would have known the idea of what a Fifth Column is. Indeed, I speculate the younger side of the spectrum of the Baby Boomers may have only heard bits and pieces of a Fifth Column from their parents (in seriousness or mocking depending on their political demeanor).

So I am guessing a good chunk of my readers are thinking, “What is he blathering about – a Fifth Column?”

Here is the origin of the term “Fifth Column”
from askYahoo.com:

According to Britannica.com, a fifth column refers to any clandestine group or faction of subversive agents who attempt to undermine a nation's solidarity.

Who came up with the phrase, and what's with the columns? Emilio Mola Vidal, a Nationalist general during the Spanish Civil War (1936-39), originally coined the term. As four of his army columns moved on Madrid, the general referred to his militant supporters within the capital as his "fifth column," intent on undermining the loyalist government from within.

So the fifth column is a group of secret sympathizers or supporters of an enemy that engage in espionage or sabotage within defense lines or national borders.


Although it is fascinating to know who coined the term “Fifth Column” it is important to understand two words in this definition: “clandestine” and “subversive.”

Those two words are explained as “a group of secret sympathizers or supporters of an enemy that engage in espionage or sabotage within defensive lines or national borders.”

The Fifth Column group bent on transforming the USA in 1930’s through early 1960’s was American Communist Party members or Communist sympathizers. Communism from within America was a true Fifth Column threat that only really became neutralized in the early Sixty’s. This is where the political demeanor of your parents and grandparents come in.

As a side bar to what I am leading up to let me explain. The Administration of President FDR was infiltrated by Soviet Communists. High level Fifth Columnists were influential of the decisions of FDR, particularly as the “New Deal” progressed to end The Depression of the 1930’s in America. That highest place Soviet Agent was FDR’s personal Advisor Harry Hopkins.

Thus by the end of WWII there were a number of Soviet American sympathizers that the Secular Humanism of a Communist Utopia would solve global poverty and the inequalities of a Class society. These sympathizers had no idea that Stalin was murdering millions more than Hitler simply to maintain his personal Utopia of personal power.

Well anyway then came Senator Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin. He began a campaign to root out Communists from the government. McCarthy’s goals were worth but his means became more and more dubious. McCarthy began to intrude into Freedom of thought and choice of people who were not even part of the government. The classic example is the 1940’s Black List of Hollywood. Hollywood actors and actresses that had even a whiff of Communist sympathy (even if it was a college fling) became Black Listed from working. Thus Charlie Chaplin (one of the world’s greatest comedic actors and a Communist sympathizer) left America and finished his days in Switzerland.

The term McCarthyism became synonymous for a political witch hunt syndrome. Thus McCarthy became discredited in his day. If only McCarthy had used professional investigative methods to disclose actual subversives, he might have gone down in history as a hero. McCarthy died a broken man alcoholic man as the man that “cried wolf” too often. Ironically even today many American history books will portray Harry Hopkins as the architect of the New Deal associated with FDR to get America out of the Depression, painting Hopkins as an American hero.

Communism was an actual Fifth Column working to transform America from a Capitalist land of freedom to a Communist land State monitored despotism.

Is there a Fifth Column in America today? YES!

America’s new Fifth Column threat is Radical Islam.

In mid-June David Gaubatz published a report in InsightMag.com that there were 400 to 500 mosques in America promoting Islamist ideology (meaning death to America and the instituting of Sharia Law at any cost). These Islamofascists have convinced Leftists that in America there is freedom of religion and thus it would be Unconstitutional (ergo politically incorrect) to go after these Mosques and organizations for Conspiracy to subvert the American Government and the peace of non-Muslim (kafir) American, i.e. mostly Christians and those that stand by the Bill of Rights.

Even now Britain is experiencing the errors of accommodating their huge Mohammedan population as they are experiencing multiple al Qaeda terrorist attacks. This experience of the multiplicity of attacks is due to come to America with the huge amount of radical Islamists that get their marching orders from Wahhabists in Saudi Arabia and Islamofascist terrorist organizations like Hamas, al Qaeda and Hezbollah.

Friends this is America’s new Fifth Column. America definitely needs to change its paradigm to force this Fifth Column to disengage its potential threat to the Land of Free and Home of the Brave. Appeasement is not part of paradigm. Political Correctness is not part of that paradigm. The Left will have to choose between egalitarian Liberty and American Liberty.

Egalitarian Liberty is the problem that Europe has gotten itself hooked into; i.e. humanity is basically good and deserving of equality even if it hurts the security and freedom of others. American Liberty is a privilege that has been earned by standing up against foreign aggression including all the reasons that led to the Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. (Declaration of Independence – Excerpt)


Islamofascists, listen up! America does not want to be enslaved to Mohammedan Sharia Law in which an Allah does not view all men are created equal. Most Americans still uphold their Christian traditions and do not want to be told how believe at the penalty of death (by beheading or stoning). Americans desire Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and to have a government that exists as the result of the people’s consent not a fatwa from a deranged medieval Theo-political Mullah.

Read some detail of the Islamist Fifth Column from David Gaubatz writing in InsightMag.com.


JRH
*************************


Private undercover team exposes nationwide network of radical, anti-U.S. Islamic centers

Issue Date:
http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/islamic_0.htm - June 12-18, 2007
Posted On: 6/12/2007



Hundreds of Islamic centers in the United States have become a hot-bed of extremist activity; they promote violence, terrorism and hatred against America.


“Our initial investigation has concluded there are between 400 to 500 radical Islamic centers in the U.S.,” said David Gaubatz, the director of counterintelligence and counterterrorism for the Society of Americans for National Existence. “In those places, they preach an extreme version of Islam that says America and the West is the enemy. They espouse violence, hatred and the need for terrorism.”


Gaubatz is a former senior U.S. intelligence official, who now works for the Mapping Shari’a in America Project (www.mappingsharia.com), which is supported by SANE, a national non-profit group devoted to investigating the 2,300 Islamic centers in the U.S. for extremist activity.


Gaubatz and his investigators are currently active and will soon form a team of about 12. They pose as people interested in converting to Islam or who are current Muslims. Their goal is to infiltrate mosques and Muslim centers. Recently, he and his team penetrated the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center, located in Falls Church, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, D.C.


Sporting a beard and Muslim dress, Gaubatz said he went on May 18 to the center, pretending to be an American interested in becoming a convert to Islam. He discovered the center espoused terrorism and jihad against America.


“They are teaching what they call Jihad Qital, which means physical jihad,” Gaubatz said. “They’re teaching violence and hatred of the United States.”


Gaubatz said that he met the two primary clerics at Dar Al-Hijrah, Imam Shaker Elsayed and Imam Johari Abdulmalik. Both men have been trained in Saudi Arabia. He says another key individual is Yusef Estes, an informal senior leader at the center and an internationally influential Muslim scholar who was trained in Saudi Arabia.


“They put me through the process of learning their faith and ideology,” Gaubatz said. “They felt close to me and they gave me literature and CDs. They told me to study. The literature is very Jihad Qital.”


He said that the Islamic center has deep ties to Saudi Arabia and espouses Wahhabism, a virulent and puritanical version of Islam.


“Many members of the mosque provided me literature to study. Most of the literature they gave me was from Saudi Arabia,” he said. “Their literature preaches that America and the West are decadent and evil, and that Muslims have a moral duty to engage in violence against the infidels.”


Gaubatz says that Dar Al-Hijrah and other radical Islamic centers in the U.S. are funded by Saudi Arabia, which is the primary sponsor of the Wahhabist brand of Islam.


“The ultimate goal for those at Dar Al-Hijrah is to instill Sharia law in the U.S. and have America adhere to the Islamic faith,” he said. “They want America to be an Islamic state.”


Gaubatz said that the imams at the center encouraged him to read the works of their “friends”—some of whom have been convicted for terrorism-related activities. According to Gaubatz, one of those “friends” he was encouraged to read is Ali Al-Tamimi, a radical Islamist author, who was convicted of inciting terrorism in connection with the Virginia Jihad Network.


Al-Tamimi was born and raised in the U.S., and then as a teenager went to Saudi Arabia to study Islam. He lectured often at the Center for Islamic Information and Education in Falls Church, Virginia. He was a founding member of the center, which is also known as Dar al-Arqam.


The Virginia Jihad Network was a group of radical Islamists who were charged with engaging in terrorist plots. Nine members of the group were convicted of using and possessing various weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and explosives.


Al-Tamimi was later convicted of being the spiritual leader of the group and of having encouraged them to wage Jihad on the U.S.


Gaubatz maintains that he and his team of field workers at the Mapping Shari’a in America Project are not only focusing on major metropolitan areas. Although there is plenty of Islamist activity in cities such as Detroit, Dearborn, Michigan and Washington, he says radical Muslims are also establishing education and religious centers in small towns.


“They’re branching out and teaching the Jihadist ideology in small towns across America, especially in rural areas in places like Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina,” Gaubatz said.


He says that a terrorist atrocity on U.S. soil similar to what happened on 9/11 is inevitable unless Americans take decisive measures.


“If we let our guard down, another 9/11—maybe even something worse—is going to happen again,” he said. “We need to be proactive rather than reactive.”


Gaubatz says that his investigative team is composed of individuals of various faiths, whose goal is to protect the American homeland from Islamic extremism.


“We have a team consisting of Christians, Jews and Muslims—there are several Muslims, in fact, on our team—who go undercover and try to penetrate radical mosques in this country,” he said. “This is not about being anti-Muslim. It is about being anti-extremism, anti-Jihadism and anti-terrorism.


“Our mission is to get at the truth—to find out the truth about what’s really going on in our country.”


Copyright © 2007 News World Communications

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Hamas/Fatah Civil War


Hamas/Fatah Civil War

At Two PM Central Time I heard Fox News report that Hamas is claiming complete victory in Gaza. PA President Abbas has dissolved the government of elected Hamas. This means there are two Palestinian entities in existence.

Hamas is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood which is plugged into Wahhabi medieval hate Theo-political ideology. Hamas is a Sunni organization that has accepted money and training from Shi’ite radical Iran.

Fatah leans closer to a secular style terrorism yet still very attached to radical Islam. Fatah (notoriously connected to corrupt murdering terrorist Arafat) can also trace its roots to the Muslim Brotherhood with
Arafat’s uncle being the former infamous Grand Mufti Amin el-Husseini.



Monday, April 02, 2007

Western Civilization, Remember Your History with Mohammedanism


I recently wrote that the West has to get medieval with the medieval minded radical Mohammedans. The only way to get the Islamofascists (rogue nations and non-entity terrorists) is to instill fear in their hearts.

The West has had to do this several times in history to get Mohammedans to back off. At
Tours/Poitier Charles (the Hammer) Martel beat back Mohammedans in what is now France. Inspired by El Cid (much of his exploits are legend), the Spanish began the Reconquista of Christian Land exploited by Mohammedan Moors.

The
Crusades was a defensive action inculcated with Roman Catholic largesse to get the Mohammedans to stop raids on the European side of the Mediterranean. Evidently the Mohammedans would slip into Christian towns to rape, pillage, take booty and kidnap people for slavery. Thus the Crusades embarked for two hundred years until the Mohammedans unfortunately got the upper hand.

Ottoman Turks ravished the Capital of the Eastern Roman Empire that had been whittled down to the city kingdom of Constantinople of the once mighty Byzantine Empire. From Constantinople the Ottomans ravaged Eastern Europe making it all the way to the Gates of Vienna and finally stopped by
Polish King Jan Sobieski in 1683. The Europeans push the Ottomans back to what once was Yugoslavia and Greece.

The
brave Greeks revolted in 1821 - 1832 and had their freedom restored. Former Yugoslavia became broken up by those loyal to Christianity and those that chose conversion above suppression by Mohammedans.

The end of WWI became the end of any actual military power base of the Mohammedans as Turkey surrendered and lost their empire over Arab lands to the south and Slavic lands to the north. The bloodlust of Turkish Mohammedans had not abated though. Just before the Turkish involvement ended in WWI, they forced marched Armenian Christians outside of
Turkey slaughtering tens of thousands Armenians along the way.

And now Radical Mohammedans influenced by a Sunni
Wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia and a Shi’ite radicals in Iran are attempting to restore the past via terrorism and oil money. The West needs to find another Charles the Hammer, an El Cid and a Jan Sobieski to diminish Mohammedan designs once again.

Alan Caruba fills in some historical holes that are there due to my brevity:
READ IT.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Mohammedanism and Evil


There is evil in this world. Philosophically evil may be perceived many different ways or to relatively not exist at all. Of course this is all bogus mindsets.

Evil can be known by the fruit it produces. Evil crosses theological concepts yet most theologies condemn the fruit of evil even when exacted by theological adherents.

The central theme of most of the world’s major religions is peace, tranquility and some kind of deliverance or escape from an evil world to a Heaven or union with God or the All.

Guess which religion promises a Paradise of worldly pleasures of selfish sex for the males that die exacting evil violence on combatants and innocents alike? Guess which religion promises Paradise for being in submission to its deity and prophet while simultaneously its adherents plunder innocent people and rape women?

You will not find this in the Scriptures of Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism, and Hinduism or even in eclectic faiths as Baha’i. You will find this in the assumed holy scriptures of Mohammedanism.

Mohammedanism will call all who do not believe in Allah and its prophet Mohammed as evil and doomed to judgment. Mohammedanism will fabricate lies about Christianity and Judaism as the people of the Book and allow them to live only if they promise submission to Allah. The current goal of the majority of Middle Eastern Mohammedans is the death of monikers Great Satan (America) and the little Satan (Israel). Mohammedanism wiped the existence of Buddhism from Afghanistan and ancient India. Mohammedanism tortured and murdered polytheistic Hindus in genocidal numbers until it was decided for convenience sake to extend dhimmitude and the jizya tax on the Hindus to perpetuate empire.

What is evil? It is a group of people that practice a religion stuck in the Middle Ages time zone while the present is the 21st Century. What is evil are the Mohammedans residing in Western nations and yet subscribing to Wahhabi tenets that believe nothing in Mohammedan theology is valid after 1000 AD (by Christian reckoning).

What is ludicrous is judging Mohammedanism by Western values of Freedom and Liberty when those very principles are used to encourage Mohammedan supremacy
at the expense of Freedom and Liberty.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Islamofascism Today


Wow! I was doing some research on the old Odessa post-WWII group that helped Nazis (war criminals and ideologues) escape Germany. In so doing I came across this web page entitled, “The Nazi, Communist and Radical Islamist Connection.” It basically explains that moderate Mohammedanism is not so moderate, particularly in the Middle East in which Hitler’s Nazi ideology is nearly considered heroic among the common people.

In case you were not aware, most educational media and written material in the Middle East (Sunni and Shia) is disseminated via radical Islamists or Islamofascists. The ability for that to happen is revenue available via oil purchases from abroad. Thus the Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the radical Ayatollahs of Iran send their respective teachings to Mohammedan schools, mosques and madrassas in the Middle East and to the Democratic Western nations. The silent propagation of Mohammedanism is by radicals that preach and teach violence to achieve ends.

Anyway, this huge essay compiled by
MideastNewswire.com, are a vast supply of news and editorials and pictures from other media outlets. It is a concise exploration that leads up to a conclusion about today’s radical Islamists. You will not become an expert by reading this; however you will have enough information to understand the utter stupidity of the West’s “Politically Correct” pursuits in upholding modern Mohammedanism as just another religion to be respected. One other thing you will see from this collage of articles is that today’s radical Islamism was catapulted into existence by bad decisions of the American Intelligence Community. Frankly those bad decisions are continuing to this day.

Just one more note: there are a huge amount of links and pictures provided to back up the article. I posted “The Nazi, Communist and Radical Islamist Connection” at
SlantRight.com without showing the pictures and cut way back on the links. If you wish to follow up for your own research or verification go the MideastNewswire link that I provided at the top.

Here is the SlantRight link:
So get ready for a ride of enlightenment about Mohammedanism.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Islamofascists Battle Amongst Themselves in Waziristan

Red: Taliban Control. Yellow: Threatened Islamist Control.


Waziristan is a region in Pakistan. The Pakistani government of Pervez Musharraf signed an Accord not to long ago with Islamofascist warlords of the area. In essence Musharraf gave governing autonomy to the Terrorist elements of the Taliban and al Qaeda residing in Waziristan while Pakistan maintains a dubious official sovereignty.

Now that you are caught up, check this out. The Islamofascists in Waziristan are fighting an internecine war among themselves over local issues of who is in charge of what. The solidarity of radical Mohammedanism takes a back seat to the bread and butter of what makes the locals happy.

Now isn’t that a piece of hypocrisy the Mainstream Media rarely publishes. Radical Mohammedanism’s greatest complaint against the West is the potential influence of immoral culture (actually they have a point there); thus Islamofascists berate Democracy as a mode to perpetuate immorality (a point they DO NOT have).

Yet when it comes down to controlling food, probable illegal drugs for profit and the needs and support of various locals; then typical Machiavellian politics reigns supreme in perpetuating means to justify murderous ends amongst themselves.

The Fourth Rail has an article written by Bill Roggio regarding the Religion of Peace in Waziristan - READ IT.

Related material also by Bill Roggio is
HERE TO READ.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Dhimmitude or How Western Muslims Use Western Laws


There is more and more evidence coming forth that illustrates what the jihadists cannot do by violence, Islamists will do with Western Laws to protect their Fifth Column agenda to mohammedanize the West and America.

I know you are thinking I am just being an Islamophobe and you are correct. The problem is Islamophobia is not racism as the many Islamist organizations in America, Canada and Europe would have you believe. Radical Islam is not a race. Certainly Radical Islamists have a high profile of Arab and Middle Eastern looking fellows; however Mohammedanism’s largest population is in Indonesia. That is Asian. A huge segment of Mohammedans have an Indian ancestry which is currently split up between Pakistan, Bangladesh and large segments of India.

So let us re-think this Islamophobe business is a racist business. Radical Islam is more akin to political theory radicalized by an injection of religion. It is much like what the Soviets and Red Chinese did at the beginning of their revolutionary regimes. They propagandize the population under their influence to worship a cultic status. In communism it was Karl Marx, Lennon, Mao and the State. In Mohammedanism it is the medieval acts of Mohammed and his blood lust for a cohesive empire. The empire initiated by Mohammed exercised a combination of brutality and propaganda to transform the conquered into passionate believers of the old Arab moon deity Allah.

With money from Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Shi’ite Iran,
migrating Mohammedans to America and Europe are exploiting laws of freedom and liberty reverse assimilating the cultures they have moved to. WAKE UP!

Saturday, March 17, 2007

Northern Virginiastan


I don’t know if American authorities are trying to keep Americans calm or if they are in complete denial about the radical Islamist problem in America. The Wahhabis of the Sunni and the radical Shi’ites publicly evoke anti-American rhetoric. In private there is substantial evidential inference that radical Islamists associate with their foreign counterparts or are actually planning acts of brutality themselves.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

HITLER'S LEGACY: ISLAMIC ANTISEMITISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST


I just read a most fascinating Paper written by Matthias Kuntzel concerning the connection to Hitler’s legacy and the current Islamofascism. Everyday people simply have NO idea on how much Adolf Hitler is praised and admired by Mohammedans influenced by strict adherence to Mohammed’s example and Sharia Law.

Kuntzel sets out to draw a line from Hitler to el-Husseini (Grand Mufti of Jerusalem) to Hassan al-Banna (influenced by Wahhabis and founder of Muslim Brotherhood) and other Mohammedan Nationalists of the time.

The interesting thing that stands out is that the Mohammedan nations that spew the most hatred today seemed to accept a Jewish entity in the Middle East in the late 19th Century and pre-WWI era. It was the influence of these early Islamofascists that changed the thought patterns of the Middle Eastern Mohammedan to that of common hatred of Jews, Christians and Democracy.

The great tragedy of the successful Islamofascist propaganda indoctrination of the Middle East lay in extremely short sighted diplomacy of Western Victors of WWII to cuddle up to the Mohammedan of the period. Thus war criminal el-Husseini was actually permitted to escape and now here we are today dealing with the diplomacy of expediency.

This is the same kind of diplomacy promoted by the current Democratic Party, RINO’s and Appeasement minded Europeans.

You must read Kuntzel’s Paper for an understanding of the present. You can go to the source at
Think-Israel or I have it posted after this introduction at SlantRight.com.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

America's Islamist Threat


Joe Kaufmann writing for FrontPageMagazine.com exposes the influence of radical Mohammedanism in America. Friend this is not a picture of moderate religion. It is a picture of a fifth column (old Cold War lingo) with an agenda to end the American Way of life.

Saturday, February 03, 2007

The Wrath of Terrorists is Among Us


Biography from The Intelligence Summit:


Paul "Dave" Gaubatz, former Federal Agent with the equivalent rank of major, is a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and counterterrorism specialist. He has acquired over two decades of experience while working on assignments in Middle-Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jordan, and Iraq. Currently Chief Field Investigator with the Dallas County Medical Examiner, Dallas, Texas, Mr. Gaubatz created Gaubatz Arabic & Counterterrorism Lecture Services in December, 2004.

The first U.S. civilian Federal Agent deployed to Nasiriyah, Iraq, in 2003, Mr. Gaubatz was able to travel to various cities throughout Iraq, using his Arabic-language training extensively. During this time, he led a mission to rescue the family of Mohammed Odeh Al-Rehaief, the Iraqi lawyer who saved the life of Private Jessica Lynch. Today, Mr. Al-Rehaief and his family live safely in the Washington, D.C. area.

Upon returning from Iraq in July 2003, Mr. Gaubatz wrote a practical, basic Arabic street survival guide, and began lecturing in schools and businesses, and also to law enforcement officers. He instructed ... …



Dave Gaubatz knows what he is talking about. I am certain the Slanted Left has had the benefit of Gaubatz’s professional expertise. I am also certain that the national politics of America and the potentiality of geopolitics (confronting Syria and Iran militarily) has spurned public acknowledgement of Gaubatz’s Intelligence findings.

It is my opinion that the Left Elite and the Right Elite have dropped the ball on the War on Terrorism. There is way too much emphasis in not offending Mohammedans and not enough emphasis in seeking out Islamofascist terrorists that do not follow International Conventions or the Laws of the Land in the various nations the terrorists anonymously roam.

Islamofascism needs to be stamped out at least on a local level. YES, this means the utilization of profiling. If it makes Lefties more comfortable, the profiling should not be so much racial profiling as Islamofascist profiling.

Islamofascism and radical Islamism reach beyond race. This odious ideology clothed in religion is not just Middle Eastern. This radicalism has infected Western nations on a local level through the Petro-Dollars of Sunni Wahhabists and Iranian Shi’ites.

Those two ideologies preach and teach hatred of Israel and America in particular. Those two ideologies have exported that hatred by building Mosques in the West and providing the ideology of hate to be taught in the Western Mosques.

To comprehend the danger which I speak, read Dave Gaubatz’s Essay on
SLEEPER CELLS IN AMERICA AND CANADA.