Showing posts with label Mohammedans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohammedans. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

More on the Myth of the Existence of Palestinian Arabs



It amazing the things history reveals after documents become declassified, acquired by stealth or just plain released to public perusal.

Writer David Solway demonstrates the
mythical concept of a Palestinian Arab people is just a bunch of Mohammedan Arab and Western Leftist drivel to delete land from Israel at Israel’s expense and National security to appease Jew hating Mohammedans.

JRH 8/6/08 (Hat tip to Israpundit)


Saturday, April 14, 2007

Arab World Reports Anti-Israel Rumors as Fact


Rumors are often regarded as fact in the Middle East in regard to anything negative about Israel. Anti-Israeli and anti-Jewish rumors are spread all the time. Prominent Mohammedan media outlets pick up the rumors and report them as fact.

An example of this irresponsible Mohammedan journalism is the latest and hottest rumor to date:
Israeli melons distributed in Saudi Arabia are infected with AIDS.

(Hat tip to
Jihad Watch)
JRH
**************************************


'Israeli melons have AIDS'

Text message spreading through Saudi Arabia claiming melons entering the kingdom from Israel are infected with AIDS causes frenzy. Officials deny rumors

Roee Nahmias
Published: 04.13.07, 16:14 /
Israel News
YNetNews.com

"Beware of Israeli melons infected with AIDS arriving in Saudi Arabia!" is the latest rumor being spread throughout Saudi Arabia like a wildfire.

An SMS message being sent around the country this week said, "The Saudi Interior Ministry warns its citizens of a truck loaded with AIDS infected melons that Israel brought into the country via a 'ground corridor.'"

The Interior Minister's spokesman General Mansour al Turki responded to news of the message and made it clear to a-Sharq al-Awsat newspaper that the Ministry "did not issue any such announcement. This is just a rumor."


This is not the first rumor to spread through the country recently. Just last month another rumor had it that sweets containing carcinogenic flour were being sold in many stores.


Al Turki urged the public to ignore such passing rumors, and said that the authorities were doing everything in their power to ensure the citizens' wellbeing.


Head of the center for chemicals and toxins in Mecca, Dr Ahmad Elias also stressed that there was no truth to these rumors.


"The center is the first official body that would receive such information, if it were true, in order to investigate and inform the relevant bodies to take the necessary steps," said Elias.


"The HIV virus cannot survive in any temperature other than that of the human body, which cannot be reached in fruits," he explained.

The rumor, despite being denied several times, has gained so much steam in the Arab world that it made it to the front page of one of the most important Arabic language newspapers.


Many received an SMS supposedly from the Saudi Interior Ministry saying, "Please forward quickly."


Copyright © Yedioth Internet. All rights reserved.

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Dhimmitude or How Western Muslims Use Western Laws


There is more and more evidence coming forth that illustrates what the jihadists cannot do by violence, Islamists will do with Western Laws to protect their Fifth Column agenda to mohammedanize the West and America.

I know you are thinking I am just being an Islamophobe and you are correct. The problem is Islamophobia is not racism as the many Islamist organizations in America, Canada and Europe would have you believe. Radical Islam is not a race. Certainly Radical Islamists have a high profile of Arab and Middle Eastern looking fellows; however Mohammedanism’s largest population is in Indonesia. That is Asian. A huge segment of Mohammedans have an Indian ancestry which is currently split up between Pakistan, Bangladesh and large segments of India.

So let us re-think this Islamophobe business is a racist business. Radical Islam is more akin to political theory radicalized by an injection of religion. It is much like what the Soviets and Red Chinese did at the beginning of their revolutionary regimes. They propagandize the population under their influence to worship a cultic status. In communism it was Karl Marx, Lennon, Mao and the State. In Mohammedanism it is the medieval acts of Mohammed and his blood lust for a cohesive empire. The empire initiated by Mohammed exercised a combination of brutality and propaganda to transform the conquered into passionate believers of the old Arab moon deity Allah.

With money from Wahhabi Saudi Arabia and Shi’ite Iran,
migrating Mohammedans to America and Europe are exploiting laws of freedom and liberty reverse assimilating the cultures they have moved to. WAKE UP!

Friday, January 05, 2007

The New Middle East


Richard Haass, the President of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), suggests a “New Middle East” is emerging that will continually exclude the influence of America. The new influences in the Middle East will increasingly be how the area will manage the natural conflict between Sunni and Shia Mohammedans. The only thing the Sunni and Shia seem to be in complete agreement is the hatred of Jewish Israel.

Haass surmises that Saudi Arabia and Egypt will go nuclear to counter a nuclear Iran. I found it interesting that Haass did not mention an already nuclear Pakistan. Pakistan for the most part is Sunni, however it Pakistan’s rogue scientists that initially introduced nuke secrets to Iran.

Haass believes that a continued U.S. military presence in the Middle East can only harm American National Interests because of the distrust of Sunni and Shia of America. On the other hand America has to consider its primary ally in the Middle East. That ally is not Saudi Arabia! America’s primary ally is Israel. The only successful Western style democracy in existence in the Middle East is Israel.

Haass agrees with the
Iraq Study Group Report that America should engage Syria and Iran pertaining to stability in Iraq. I still see this using gasoline to put out a fire. Syria and Iran have militaristic aims that center on the destruction of Israel. Why in the world would America enlist the help of terrorist promoting rogue nations as Syria and Iran?

The only possible reason for doing so is to sell out Jewish Israel to gain economic favor from an oil rich Mohammedan Middle East. In a Western perspective, this is placing greed above our own cultural ethics. I find the thought of this as reprehensible. It is an anti-Semitic move that would emerge as a 21st century Holocaust of Jews. Nuclear armed Sunnis and Shi’ites that hate Israel will result in yet another attack on Israel. These attacks have occurred frequently since 1948 whenever Mohammedans had perceived a collective advantage to rid the Middle East of a non-Mohammedan Jewish/Zionist government.

The globe’s first actual nuclear could be between sliver small Israel and confidently nuclear armed Mohammedans. I assure you the entire world would participate for one reason alone: the black gold resource of oil.

I am afraid the only way to resolve the crisis of the Middle East is considered currently as politically incorrect. The West must resolve to utilize some old fashioned imperialistic tactics to protect National Interests and Western Cultural Interests. The West must collectively use extreme prejudice to end the leadership behind Islamofascist radical Mohammedanism.

A usually polarized West (well America anyway) have a
common enemy, that enemy is radical Mohammedanism. Radical Mohammedanism greatest desire and end game is to supplant Western Culture with its belief in Civil Rights and Liberty with a Mohammedan culture of intolerant Sharia Law. An allied front in the West must wake-up to this radical agenda.

Incidentally a majority of Mosques have their financial support in nations in which radical Mohammedanism is preeminent. The
Wahhabis and Muslim Brotherhood of the Sunnis have funneled money into both terrorist organizations and European/American Mosques. Thus the affects of radical Mohammedanism is not merely an action that occurs in a far away land, increasingly it is becoming a localized phenomena.

Friday, December 08, 2006

Is a Global Jewish Sell-Out Afoot?


The DEBKAfile (*via Prophecy Update) pretty much validates Israel’s contempt for the new Secretary of Defense. In the Confirmation Hearings before the U.S. Senate, Gates publicly revealed aspects of Israel’s National Security that should not have been placed in the public record.

Gates revealed that Israel has a nuclear arsenal. Of course everyone knows this; however Israel has never made this a public issue. Israel’s nuclear arsenal would only be used in self-defense from its wacko Mohammedan and Islamofascist neighbors and terrorists.

Israel must be reeling from American hints of forcing Israel to give up the Golan Heights to Syria and acquiescing to a nuclear armed Iran. These are issues that could terminate Israel’s existence. If or when Israel is forced to do the unthinkable, who will secure Israel’s existence?

Will the EU come to Israel’s rescue with a combined Mohammedan invasion? And I do mean combined! Do you think Mohammedans that have made peace (Egypt and Jordan) will not join in an invasion if they presume the Mohammedans will finally eliminate Jews from the Middle East?

Will America come to Israel’s aid if a combined Mohammedan invasion comes to the Zionist Nation? I do not think that would be the case by the implication of Gates’ testimony before the Senate. There is the appearance of a Jewish sell out afoot.

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Pat Robertson: Radical Muslims Are 'Satanic'

Islamofascists are satanic. I concur with old Pat 100%. The problem with Pat is that he has shot from the hip one too many times damaging the credibility of his opinion. Pat got this one correct, however because of the credibility damage he will probably be villified by the MSM for saying. Also, his colleagues will again recede into politically correctness and leave Pat dangling.

It is self-evident that Mohammedans have erupted into murderous violence and destruction of property over issues they have found offensive (right or wrong). It is like a spoiled brat of a non-reproving wealthy couple allowing their brat to get and have its way at its pleasure. Mohammedans feel they can dish out wrong headedness and cry foul or Islamophobia when the kafir dishes it back. Yep, that is brat.
And yep, Pat Robertson is right!
--------------------------------
Pat Robertson: Radical Muslims Are 'Satanic'
Monday, March 13, 2006 9:14 p.m. EST
Newsmax.com

Television evangelist Pat Robertson said Monday on his live news-and-talk program "The 700 Club" that Islam is not a religion of peace, and that radical Muslims are "satanic."

Robertson's comments came after he watched a news story on his Christian Broadcasting Network about Muslim protests in Europe over the cartoon drawings of the Prophet Muhammad.

He remarked that the outpouring of rage elicited by cartoons "just shows the kind of people we're dealing with. These people are crazed fanatics, and I want to say it now: I believe it's motivated by demonic power. It is satanic and it's time we recognize what we're dealing with."

Robertson also said that "the goal of Islam, ladies and gentlemen, whether you like it or not, is world domination."

In a statement later Monday, Robertson said he was referring specifically to terrorists who want to bomb innocent people as being motivated by Satan. In the news story, he noted, radical Muslims were shown screaming: "May Allah bomb you! May Osama Bin Laden bomb you!"

Angell Watts, a Robertson spokeswoman, said in a telephone interview that the news segment also included comments from a moderate Muslim in the United Kingdom saying radicals don't represent most Muslims in that country.

Robertson's Virginia Beach-based network did not include his remarks when it posted the program on its Web site, however. That decision was made out of concern Robertson's remarks could be misinterpreted if viewed out of context, Watts said.

Monday's comments were similar to remarks he made on his program in 2002, when he said Islam "is not a peaceful religion that wants to coexist. They want to coexist until they can control, dominate and then, if need be, destroy."

Robertson has come under intense criticism in recent months for comments suggesting that American agents should assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine retribution for Israel's pullout from the Gaza Strip.

Robertson recently told ABC's "Good Morning America" that he comments off the cuff after watching news segments. He later told the Christian magazine World that he's being more careful and reviewing news stories before going on the air.

The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, called Robertson's new comments "grossly irresponsible."

"At a time when inter-religious tensions around the world are at an all-time high, Robertson seems determined to throw gasoline on the fire," Lynn said in a statement.

© 2006 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.