Sunday, September 30, 2007

Episode 15 Sgt. Freedom Campaign

This guy calls himself Sgt Freedom. Once you listen to him you will think of him as Drill Sgt Freedom.

Now a word of warning to those who are offended by profanity: there is some. When I say “Drill Sergeant” I mean everything that goes along with that imagery.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Sgt. Eddie Jeffers – A True American Patriot

I was alerted to an “opinion piece” that was placed in a publication of Frank Salvato. I was alerted first of all from a Vox network friend – Twana's Blog. She directed me to the Vox blog entitled, “Joe’s Blog.” From Joe’s Blog I found Salvato’s original post at The News Media Journal.

The “opinion piece” was written by Sgt. Eddie Jeffers back in February 2007.

You might ask, “Why was something written several months ago and not by a journalist at that, relevant to today?”

The reason is tragic however in tragedy Sgt. Jeffers’ words are more significant now than they ever were back in February. Sgt Jeffers died fighting for his country and to make a difference in Iraq on September 19, 2007.

Matching Sgt. Jeffers’ words with a soldier’s death is a slap in the face of dishonorable Democrats as Pelosi, Murtha, Reid and many other politicians praying for bad things to happen to American soldiers to exploit a potential political gain in Election 2008. The words of Sgt Jeffers nauseate my soul when I think of the Cindy Sheehan anti-war types in America. Sgt. Jeffers’ words nauseate my soul when I KNOW Iran and its Twelver Islamofascist Shia ruling elite supply arms and training that directly affects American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sgt. Jeffers’ words nauseate my soul KNOWING wealthy Wahhabi elites, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Muslim Brotherhood affiliates conspire to implement American deaths and provide hate literature for propaganda in American Mosques and train Islamist terrorist to infiltrate American soil with the help of American non-profit Mohammedan organizations acting is the conduit.

Contemplate what stirs your soul as you read Frank Salvato’s tribute to Sgt. Eddie Jeffers.


The Death of a Soldier...The Life of a Patriot

USA Frank Salvato, Managing Editor
September 21, 2007

The New Media Journal

What is a patriot? What is a hero? We throw these words around a lot these days and we bestow them on those who most often don’t come close to warranting the honor. From athletes to artists, dissenters to politicians and movie stars, our society holds some of the most undeserving people in high esteem.

So, what is a patriot? Who really should be designated a hero?

Patriot: A person who loves, supports and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion. –

Hero: A man of distinguished courage or ability, admired for his brave deeds and noble qualities. –

Last February my publication ran an opinion piece by a young US Army sergeant named Eddie Jeffers. Eddie was serving in one of Iraq’s hot-spots, Ramadi Iraq. His job was the hard job: clearing buildings, disrupting terrorist cells and operations, everything that we imagine when we think of what it must be like for our soldiers who are “in the thick of it.”

After reading Eddie’s piece the first time I realized the true definition of patriotism, of heroism. It isn’t about voicing dissent or exercising free speech. It isn’t about achieving political change or affecting the world politick. And while there may be some credence to the notion of standing up for what you believe in that’s only one component.

Patriotism, heroism, is providing the protection so that others can freely voice dissent and participate in politics. A patriot takes up the banner of devotion to our country dedicating himself to the principles and ideology that make up its foundation. A hero has the courage to defend those principles, that ideology, so that others may enjoy liberty.

At 7am on September 19, 2007 in Ramadi, Iraq, on a sweltering Iraqi summer day, a good friend whom I knew but never met, a true American patriot and a hero died. US Army Sergeant Eddie Jeffers died in the service of our country, fighting the enemy on Iraqi soil so that we don’t have to fight them on ours. He died protecting the innocent among the Iraqis so that they might benefit from the same principles and ideology that afford us the freedom to even consider debating the legitimacy of the conflict in which he fought.

Through the tears of anguish I cried upon hearing the news I felt a genuine anger beginning to envelop me. I felt the injustice and inequity that comes with experiencing the death of not only a 23-year old, but a genuine and fine individual. But then I began to contemplate the words Eddie chose to share with us from Ramadi, Iraq, an earthly hell which he endured and will never return from. I reflected on his concerns and his worries and I realized that anguish and anger – in the context of his sacrifice and the sacrifice of his family – are selfish.

I am not related to Eddie, but I feel a special brotherhood with him. I will be celebrating Eddie's life, saluting his honor and I am motivated by his service and dedication, his patriotism and heroism, his memory, to make sure that our country does right by his life.

I will not surrender to the visionless where this conflict is concerned. Instead, I will engage them with facts and foresight. I will not give-up on the mission in which Eddie was engaged simply for the pressure to do so. Instead, I will employ the realistic understanding of the consequences of quitting before the mission is through. I will not retreat because it is the popular thing to do, rather I will rely heavily on the truth of the matter, enlisting facts and reason in an effort to make others understand the cost of defeat. And I will not fail.

Most importantly, I will make sure that Sergeant Eddie Jeffers has the last word on his thoughts and feelings about both his mission and what is now his destiny. Here now is Eddie Jeffers if only in his words:

Hope Rides Alone by Sgt. Eddie Jeffers
February 1, 2007, Ramadi, Iraq

I stare out into the darkness from my post, and I watch the city burn to the ground. I smell the familiar smells, I walk through the familiar rubble, and I look at the frightened faces that watch me pass down the streets of their neighborhoods. My nerves hardly rest; my hands are steady on a device that has been given to me from my government for the purpose of taking the lives of others.

I sweat, and I am tired. My back aches from the loads I carry. Young American boys look to me to direct them in a manner that will someday allow them to see their families again...and yet, I too, am just a age not but a few years more than that of the ones I lead. I am stressed, I am scared, and I am paranoid...because death is everywhere. It waits for me, it calls to me from around street corners and windows, and it is always there.

There are the demons that follow me, and tempt me into thoughts and actions that are not my own...but that are necessary for survival. I've made compromises with my humanity. And I am not alone in this. Miles from me are my brethren in this world, who walk in the same streets...who feel the same things, whether they admit to it or not.

And to think, I volunteered for this...

And I am ignorant to the rest of the world...or so I thought.

But even thousands of miles away, in Ramadi, Iraq, the cries and screams and complaints of the ungrateful reach me. In a year, I will be thrust back into society from a life and mentality that doesn't fit your average man. And then, I will be alone. And then, I will walk down the streets of America, and see the yellow ribbon stickers on the cars of the same people who compare our President to Hitler.

I will watch the television and watch the Cindy Sheehans, and the Al Frankens, and the rest of the ignorant sheep of America spout off their mouths about a subject they know nothing about. It is their right, however, and it is a right that is defended by hundreds of thousands of boys and girls scattered across the world, far from home. I use the word boys and girls, because that's what they are. In the Army, the average age of the infantryman is nineteen years old. The average rank of soldiers killed in action is Private First Class.

People like Cindy Sheehan are ignorant. Not just to this war, but to the results of their idiotic ramblings, or at least I hope they are. They don't realize its effects on this war. In this war, there are no Geneva Conventions, no cease fires. Medics and Chaplains are not spared from the enemy's brutality because it's against the rules. I can only imagine the horrors a military Chaplain would experience at the hands of the enemy. The enemy slinks in the shadows and fights a coward’s war against us. It is effective though, as many men and women have died since the start of this war. And the memory of their service to America is tainted by the inconsiderate remarks on our nation's news outlets. And every day, the enemy changes...only now, the enemy is becoming something new. The enemy is transitioning from the Muslim extremists to Americans. The enemy is becoming the very people whom we defend with our lives. And they do not realize it. But in denouncing our actions, denouncing our leaders, denouncing the war we live and fight, they are isolating the military from society...and they are becoming our enemy.

Democrats and peace activists like to toss the word "quagmire" around and compare this war to Vietnam. In a way they are right, this war is becoming like Vietnam. Not the actual war, but in the isolation of country and military. America is not a nation at war; they are a nation with its military at war. Like it or not, we are here, some of us for our second, or third times; some even for their fourth and so on. Americans are so concerned now with politics, that it is interfering with our war.

Terrorists cut the heads off of American citizens on the internet...and there is no outrage, but an American soldier kills an Iraqi in the midst of battle, and there are investigations, and sometimes soldiers are even jailed...for doing their job.It is absolutely sickening to me to think our country has come to this. Why are we so obsessed with the bad news? Why will people stop at nothing to be against this war, no matter how much evidence of the good we've done is thrown in their face? When is the last time CNN or MSNBC or CBS reported the opening of schools and hospitals in Iraq? Or the leaders of terror cells being detained or killed? It's all happening, but people will not let up their hatred of President Bush. They will ignore the good news, because it just might show people that Bush was right.

America has lost its will to fight. It has lost its will to defend what is right and just in the world. The crazy thing of it all is that the American people have not even been asked to sacrifice a single thing. It’s not like World War II, where people rationed food and turned in cars to be made into metal for tanks. The American people have not been asked to sacrifice anything. Unless you are in the military or the family member of a service member, its life as usual...the war doesn't affect you.

But it affects us. And when it is over and the troops come home and they try to piece together what's left of them after their service...where will the detractors be then? Where will the Cindy Sheehans be to comfort and talk to soldiers and help them sort out the last couple years of their lives, most of which have been spent dodging death and wading through the deaths of their friends? They will be where they always are, somewhere far away, where the horrors of the world can't touch them. Somewhere where they can complain about things they will never experience in their lifetime; things that the young men and women of America have willingly taken upon their shoulders.

We are the hope of the Iraqi people. They want what everyone else wants in life: safety, security, somewhere to call home. They want a country that is safe to raise their children in. Not a place where their children will be abducted raped and murdered if they do not comply with the terrorists demands. They want to live on, rebuild and prosper. And America has given them the opportunity, but only if we stay true to the cause and see it to its end. But the country must unite in this endeavor...we cannot place the burden on our military alone. We must all stand up and fight, whether in uniform or not. And supporting us is more than sticking yellow ribbon stickers on your cars. It's supporting our President, our troops and our cause.

Right now, the burden is all on the American soldiers. Right now, hope rides alone. But it can change, it must change. Because there is only failure and darkness ahead for us as a country, as a people, if it doesn't.

Let's stop all the political nonsense, let's stop all the bickering, let's stop all the bad news and let's stand and fight!

Isn't that what America is about anyway?

It is what America is all about. Godspeed Eddy. Godspeed.

The family of Sergeant Eddie Jeffers, USA, asks that should you be moved to do so a donation in his name to the
Fisher House would be appreciated. Eddie always took care of his men.


Sgt. Eddie Jeffers – A True American Patriot
John R. Houk
© September 29, 2007

The Death of a Soldier...The Life of a Patriot
Frank Salvato is the vice president and executive director of
Basics Project a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(C)(3) research and education initiative. He also serves as the managing editor for The New Media Journal. His writing has been recognized by the US House International Relations Committee and the Japan Center for Conflict Prevention. His organization, Basics Project, partnered with America's Truth Forum in producing the first ever national symposium series addressing the root causes of radical Islamist terrorism with events taking place in Washington DC, Las Vegas, NV and scheduled to take place in additional locations across the country. Mr. Salvato has appeared on The O'Reilly Factor on FOX News Channel and is the host of the NMJ Radio show broadcast global on NetTalkWorld global talk radio and broadcast live on BlogTalk Radio. He is a regular guest on The Right Balance with Greg Allen on the Accent Radio Network, syndicated on over 25 stations nationally and on The Captain's America Radio Show catering to the US Armed Forces around the world, as well as an occasional guests on radio programs across the country. His opinion-editorials are syndicated nationally and he is occasionally quoted in The Federalist. Mr. Salvato is available for public speaking engagements.

The New Media © 2007

Why is There a United Nations?

It is beyond me why Western Democracies continue membership in the United Nations. The U.N. Charter created by victorious Democracies over Fascism, Nazism and Japanese Imperial brutality at the end of WWII has been rendered irrelevant since the inclusion Mohammedan nations, Mohammedan sympathetic nations and despotic Third World Nations.

U.N. Charter Preamble:


* To save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

* To reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

* To establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

* To promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,


* To practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and

* To unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and

* To ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and

* To employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,


Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.

Obviously this is a meaningless scrap of geopolitical humbug.

Here is the Preamble to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (adopted by the U.N. in 1948 – Hmmm … The very year Arab Mohammedan nations first tried to wipe Israel off the map):

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Despotic Communist nations made this a farce from day one; however with the inclusion of the influence of Mohammedan ruled nations in the U.N. General Assembly it is more a load of crap in 2007 than in 1948.

Anne Bayefsky writes about the total irrelevance of the United Nations; however she misses the reason that Western nations feel impelled to remain in the U.N. due the power of the Security Council. Unanimous votes (this excludes abstentions) in the Security Council are capable of mobilizing a significant military array to enforce the will of the Security Council will (but not necessarily the United Nations will comprised of the General Assembly and the Secretary-General).

The former Soviet Union’s abstention in Korean War illustrated this and the USA took full advantage to engage in a U.N. sanctioned war that ended up in a stalemate and the separation of Korea into two separate nations.

The Global lesson learned is that one veto nullifies even a majority vote of the Security Council. Therein lay the hesitation of America or any other permanent Security Council nation from departing from United Nations membership. If a Britain, France or America (three of five permanent members) should leave the U.N. the remaining permanent members (Russia and China) could lead a coalition that would be detrimental geopolitically to some nation or nations.

Thus the only way for America to abandon the U.N. is to pre-arrange a coalition to counter her enemies. Currently even Western Democratic nations are jealous of American global hegemony; therefore lay the American quandary with the United Nations.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Fifth Column Radical Islamists Use Western Perks –

Fifth Column Radical Islamists Use Western Perks –
Entertainment, Recruiting and Propaganda Dissemination

What a slap to the face of Americans at home and fighting the War on Terror abroad! Six Flags Over Texas in Dallas (actually suburb Arlington); Texas has rented their Amusement Park on October 14 (SUNDAY) to the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA).

You might ask or wonder: What’s the big deal, America is a free country free to worship whatever religion chosen?

This is true but allowing the practice of the form of religion the ICNA practices is comparable to an outstanding analogy on the limits of Freedom of Speech: One is free to think and speak the values of one’s conscience or values (even if repulsive); however one is not allowed to holler out “FIRE” in a crowded theatre inciting panic and human harm when in fact there is NO FIRE.

This is an apt analogy for ICNA is part of an extensive network of Islamist organizations in America that have extremely close ties to Islamist terrorist organizations in foreign nations. These Islamist terrorists’ goal in life is to kill Jews and American non-Mohammedans and overtake lands and force Mohammedanism as the religion of the land extricating the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of Religion forever.

These American Islamist organizations delude the American government by proclaiming they represent Mohammedan-Americans and their civil rights and should enjoy the same freedoms as any other religion to propagate their beliefs. The problem is their beliefs are comparable to White Supremacists spitting the vile language of superiority over other creeds inciting hatred and violence. In the case of Mohammedan organizations like ICNA and CAIR and many others they send monetary support abroad for acts of violence to terrorize people to their way of thinking and to kill American soldiers and interests (not to mention Jewish, Israeli and Christians) that operate in foreign lands. AND these American Mohammedan organizations also receive money from terrorist organization that has found a way to have pseudo-legal status in their lands of centrality. Examples of this are Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, Wahhabi radicals in Saudi Arabia, Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) in Pakistan and many others.

It is time to pull an Eliot Ness on these Islamist organizations in America to purge the anti-American ones from the ones that truly wish to practice their faith in peace and harmony within the Laws the United States of America.

Here is a more
EVIDENTIARY ESSAY by Joe Kaufman of CAIR Watch that validates my passionate railing against un-American activities and Islamist-Americans.

Thursday, September 27, 2007


It is time to re-address the concept that Mohammedans practice, particularly radical Islamists or Islamofascists. This paradigm crosses Mohammedan sectarianism, i.e. the two major groups – Sunni and Shia.

I am going to give the Mohammedans that consider themselves “Moderate” the benefit of the doubt and presume they do not practice this paradigm established by their prophet Mohammed.

O yes, I should give this paradigm a name. There are various translations yet similar pronunciations of the paradigm. That paradigm is known as al-taqiyya or taqiyya or takeyya. They all mean the same thing and are practiced by millions of radical Islamists or Islamofascists.

Now here is the deal: I was blog surfing and came upon the
Muslihoon blog which offers this definition of “Taqiyyah”:

Taqiyya: “To fear.” Based primarily on Koran 3:28 and 16:106, taqiyya is an Islamic doctrine allowing Muslims to dissemble their true beliefs when fearing persecution. Based on certain hadiths, some ulema expand the meaning of taqiyya to also permit general lying in order to advance any cause beneficial to Islam.

Taqiyya offers Mohammedans a moral value system that enables a person to lie and deceive to non-Mohammedans (the kafir) to bide time to gain strength to re-confront non-Mohammedans to offer conversion, dhimmitude or death.

Excerpt from “Lying in Islam” by Abdullah Al Araby:

Provisions for lying in IslamMost Muslims are familiar with the principles of Islam that will justify lying in situations where they sense the need to do so. Among these are:

*War is deception.*The necessities justify the forbidden.*If faced by two evils, choose the lesser of the two.

These principles are derived from passages found in the Quran and the Hadith.In the Quran, Allah, allegedly, says:

"Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but He will call you to account for your deliberate oaths: for expiation, feed ten indigent persons, on a scale of the average for the food of your families; or clothe them; or give a slave his freedom. If that is beyond your means, fast for three days. That is the expiation for the oaths ye have sworn. But keep to your oaths. Thus doth Allah make clear to you His signs, that ye may be grateful." Surah 5:89"Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness (vain) in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts; and He is Oft-forgiving, Most Forbearing." Surah 2:225"Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief, except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty." Surah 16: 106

The noted Islamic commentator, Al-Tabary explained Surah 16:106 as a verse that had been revealed to Mohammed after he learned that Ammar Ibn Yasser was forced to deny his faith in Mohammed when kidnapped by the Banu Moghera tribe. Mohammed consoled Ammar by telling him, "If they turned, you turn." (Meaning: if they again capture you, you are allowed to deny me again.)These and similar passages from the Quran clearly reveal that Muslims' unintentional lies are forgivable and that even their intentional lies can be absolved by performing extra duties. It is also clear that if forced to do so, Muslims can lie while under oath and can even falsely deny faith in Allah, as long as they maintain the profession of faith in their hearts.In the Hadith, Mohammed, emphasizes the same concept. From "Ehiaa Oloum al-Din," by the famous Islamic scholar al-Ghazali, Vol. 3: PP.284-287:

One of Mohammed's daughters, Umm Kalthoum, testified that she had never heard the Apostle of Allah condone lying, except in these three situations:1. For reconciliation among people.2. In war.3. Amongst spouses, to keep peace in the family.

One passage from the Hadith quotes Mohammed as saying: "The sons of Adam are accountable for all lies except those uttered to help bring reconciliation between Muslims."Another says, "Aba Kahl, reconcile among people."(Meaning: even through lying.)The following quote demonstrates the broadness of situations in which the prophet permitted lying. "The sons of Adam are accountable for all lies with these exceptions: During war because war is deception, to reconcile among two quarreling men, and for a man to appease his wife."The principle of Al-TakeyyaThe Arabic word, "Takeyya", means "to prevent," or guard against. The principle of Al Takeyya conveys the understanding that Muslims are permitted to lie as a preventive measure against anticipated harm to one's self or fellow Muslims. This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. They can even deny the faith, if they do not mean it in their hearts. Al-Takeyya is based on the following Quranic verse:

"Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution (prevention), that ye may Guard yourselves from them (prevent them from harming you.) But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah." Surah 3: 28

According to this verse a Muslim can pretend to befriend infidels (in violation of the teachings of Islam) and display adherence with their unbelief to prevent them from harming him.Under the concept of Takeyya and short of killing another human being, if under the threat of force, it is legitimate for Muslims to act contrary to their faith. The following actions are acceptable:

*Drink wine, abandon prayers, and skip fasting during Ramadan.*Renounce belief in Allah.*Kneel in homage to a deity other than Allah.*Utter insincere oaths.

The implications of the principle of Al-Takeyya Unfortunately, when dealing with Muslims, one must keep in mind that Muslims can communicate something with apparent sincerity, when in reality they may have just the opposite agenda in their hearts. Bluntly stated, Islam permits Muslims to lie anytime that they perceive that their own well-being, or that of Islam, is threatened.In the sphere of international politics, the question is: Can Muslim countries be trusted to keep their end of the agreements that they sign with non-Muslim nations? It is a known Islamic practice, that when Muslims are weak they can agree with most anything. Once they become strong, then they negate what they formerly vowed.The principle of sanctioning lying for the cause of Islam bears grave implications in matters relating to the spread of the religion of Islam in the West. Muslim activists employ deceptive tactics in their attempts to polish Islam's image and make it more attractive to prospective converts. They carefully try to avoid, obscure, and omit mentioning any of the negative Islamic texts and teachings.
Read the whole Essay.

Is Al-Qaeda Psyops Slowly Taking Pakistan Piecemeal?

For those of you who do not follow the news very much or possibly you follow only selective portions of the news because in this day and age local political and geopolitical news is so immense that Joe American must pick and choose the news to follow as one perceives the effect the information has on our interests or lives.

Thus here is a tidbit of news you may have heard or not heard of: old Usama bin Laden (UBL) from location unknown but probably the Waziristan region of Northern Pakistan
created an audio message to Pakistanis proclaiming President Pervez Musharraf as an a kafir (infidel) and a shirk (polytheist). Due to this proclamation Pakistanis should rise up and depose and assassinate Musharraf.

Also the audio addressed the Pakistan military to stand down and do nothing as the people rise up to through out the American loving apostate Musharraf.

Since the thrill of hearing UBL for the first time in years is wearing off the news coverage of the implications of how this may affect Pakistan and vis-a-vie the United States has somewhat worn off.

Steve Schippert writing for offers a remarkable analysis of Pakistan’s potential future which would not be good for America. Schippert believes Al-Qaeda has been operating a patient campaign to win the allegiance of various tribal territories in Pakistan. The Musharraf signing away of government control of Waziristan is an example of Al-Qaeda/Taliban interests gaining autonomous victory over the Pakistan military.

Here is something to think about that Schippert may not have known when writing his Pakistan threat analysis: Former Prime Minister
Benazir Bhutto intends to return to Pakistan after being in exile since 1999. Benazir is the daughter of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Ali Bhutto served both as President and Prime Minister of Pakistan. Ali Bhutto was quite popular with the Pakistani people, however the will to retain power led to a clash of wills with other ethnic elites in Pakistan led to Ali Bhutto’s demise. In a dubious trial that was considered rigged by Bhutto ethnic enemies found him guilty of corruption and murder. The military dictator of the time General Zia-ul-Hak made the execution was carried out.

Daughter Benazir Bhutto has also been popular, yet unproven accusations by the Bhutto family enemies had her deposed for charges of corruption. There is an underlying implication that Benazir’s exile is ending to counter the growing popularity of radical Islam in Pakistan. The Pakistan military and Musharraf have not publicly welcomed her back. Nawaz Sharif is another deposed Prime Minister who was sent back into exile to Saudi Arabia has Benazir not to trust Musharraf. Time will tell just how desperate Musharraf is.

In War, the Political Spectrum Must Find a Middle Ground of Agreement

I have been a huge supporter of the Patriot Act as a means to protect American citizens from radical Islamofascism.

A Federal Judge in Oregon handed down a decision ruling that
two provisions of the Patriot Act are Unconstitutional violating the Fourth Amendment.

Fourth Amendment:

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken ruled that two provisions of the Patriot Act ran afoul to “probable cause” in the Fourth Amendment.

I hate to agree with a Liberal Judiciary, but this time I think they got it right. Violation of “probable cause” works both ways in the polarization that exists in America. Imagine the Nixon style “dirty tricks” a Democratic President like a Hillary Clinton (God forbid) could do to harass her political enemies. The Clinton family has had a history of subverting the Law by mysteriously losing evidence or having it lost to protect their hide. Just think the kind of hijinks a fringe Leftist could use claiming the Patriot Act to go after the enemies of the Leftist agenda in America.

On the other hand American security and protection of American citizens is paramount to prevent another catastrophic heinous event as 9/11 in the future.

If only the Democrats and Republicans could hammer out specifics about what “probable cause” is relating to terrorism or hostile foreign enemies might be. Then define “probable cause” with the Fourth Amendment in mind pertaining to National Security from foreign hostility, treasonous citizens or legal aliens.

The current difficulty of “probable cause” is the difference between traditional crime and foreign hostility which may be supported by indigenous citizens. Surely Patriots of the Left and the Right want their families safe.

Leftists are more altruistic and Rightists are more get the job done whatever it takes. A middle ground must be found to protect America. In War the current Leftist anti-war stance will bring more trouble not alleviate trouble. In War the current Slanted Right total cutting out of Leftist concerns will lead to political stagnation. A clear cut goal for victory will never be pursued as long as both sides of the political spectrum will not find dialogue. And that might push America to a place that forsakes the revered U.S. Constitution in favor of a political civil war in which the Left or the Right begins to the call the government shots. That is a place that reminds me of the Roman Republic transforming into the Roman Empire: From the government of two Consuls and the Roman Senate to a centered power of one man/Emperor (or Political Party).

A similar modern version of the Roman transformation would be devastating to what has made America great. It is time for political dialogue.

JRH (Hat tip:
V.O.I. Voice of Iran Newsmixer)

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Creating the Illusion of Altruistic Self-Goodness

Peter Schweizer is a Slanted Right person’s favorite thorn in the neck of hypocritical Liberals. He is the noted author of “Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.” That book is a documentation of Liberals and Democrats that advocate altruistic causes yet violate the end game of the altruistic cause constantly.

I guess the latest Liberal hypocrisy is similar to Papal Indulgences used in the Middle Ages. The Papacy used the practice of Indulgences to sell Grace/Forgiveness to the buyer or for a dead person a buyer wanted assurance to score Heaven as a revenue venture.

This practice became so blatantly outrageous by
Martin Luther’s day that he became emboldened to nail the famous “95 Theses” on the Chapel door of the University whence Luther taught in 1517. This marked the beginning of the Reformation and a separation of protesting Roman Catholic Christians from the Papal Authority of the Roman Catholic Church. Hence the emergence of multi-dimensional articles of faith that all had one thing in common – divestment of the authority of the Pope and the appellation of Protestant. The Protestants were calling Papal practices hypocritical because of divergence from forgiveness of Sins by repentance and accepting Jesus Christ as Savior. The Protestant accusation is that obvious sinners and unsure Christians could buy Salvation apart from the Redemptive Resurrection of Jesus Christ. This was pretty bold stuff for the day.

Twenty-first century Liberals have embarked on a similar path of hypocritical indulgences. It is called “Offsetting.” For example when a Liberal living in the real world drives a car or flies a Jet that pollutes the environment of the earth, they can offset their environmental sin by planting a tree or donating money to environmental activist organizations. Thus they have neutralized their environmental sin – over and over again as they participate in the reality of life. In this way a Liberal can delude themselves of their goodness and publicly heap shame on those who choose work in the real life and dream their goodness by self-made illusions.

Peter Schweizer hammers this home in an
essay written in an USA Today Opinion Column. I sense a Liberal would dread to read the essay because it might dash the illusion under the light of reality. A Slanted Right person should read the essay to confront the hypocrisy the next time a deluded Liberal attempts to embarrass you in front of friends, family or co-workers with facts they themselves participate daily.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

The ACLU is the Enemy within America

Here are some YouTube videos that are part of series posted by ThePoliticalHawk on a YouTube blog. The Series is entitled “The ACLU is the Enemy within America.”

I am going to post Part one and two here.

Here are the links to Parts three, four and five.

These last three parts illustrate the graphic practice of abortion and the violence of homosexual rights groups that expressly utilize profanity and perversions at Church services

Ahmadinejad Squirmed Way More than Portraying Defiance

Amazing! The New York Times writes of Ahmadinejad as if he were a heroic Mohammedan standing bravely and defiantly in the midst of his detractors. You have to read way down in the article that Bollinger asked strong questions and even then portrayed Ahmadinejad’s response was a frozen smile. The NYT spun the facts and made Ahmadinejad look like the good guy for his beliefs and hypocritical criticisms of Israel and the West.

Ahmadinejad says Israel does not have a right to exist because it is racist State, yet the NYT fails to report Shia and Sunni Mohammedan exploitation of non-Mohammedan peoples living within the Middle East.

The NYT gives emphasis to Ahmadinejad’s comments about American possessing “fifth generation atomic bombs” while America wishes to prevent Iran or “other people who just want nuclear power”. What a bunch of Mohammedan crap! Everyone knows that the grade of uranium Iran is producing is way beyond peaceful commercial usage of nuclear power, indeed it is weapons grade uranium. And everyone knows that combining the technology of long range missile with weapons grade uranium is a given for production.

The NYT is skewing the news to the Left when they had an opportunity to both make Ahmadinejad look like the murderous freak that he is and praising Slanted Left Columbia President Bollinger with questions that would or should make a Slanted Right person happy.

Ahmadinejad squirmed way more than portraying defiance.

Outrage turns to laughter at Ahmadinejad NY speech

Here is some information relating to Ahmadinejad’s appearance at Columbia University and the questioning of the University’s President – Lee Bollinger.

The Source is
Reuters, typically part of the slanted left Mainstream Media (MSM). So it is interesting the Reuters copy which is by Mark Egan alludes to the unhappiness Ahmadinejad had with the Bollinger questions.

This is one time a Leftie should be praised by from the full spectrum of America’s antagonizing opposing scales of political philosophy.

JRH 9/25/07 [Hat tip:

Outrage turns to laughter at Ahmadinejad NY speech

By Mark Egan
24 Sep 2007 23:10:21 GMT

NEW YORK, Sept 24 (Reuters) - Vilified as a Holocaust denier, a supporter of terrorism and a backer of Iraqi insurgents, the president of Iran was actually able to make New Yorkers burst into laughter -- but not at a joke.

"In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said at Columbia University on Monday in response to a question about the recent execution of two gay men there.

"In Iran we do not have this phenomenon," he continued. "I do not know who has told you we have it."

Loud laughs and boos broke from the audience of about 700 people, mostly students at the Ivy League school whose garb included "Stop Ahmadinejad's Evil" T-shirts.

Everyone from presidential candidates to Sept. 11 families had expressed outrage that Ahmadinejad would speak there.

After his assertions that Israel persecutes Palestinians and that Iran's nuclear program is for energy not weapons, the Iranian leader's comment on gays broke the tension.

But it spurred strong reaction too.

"This is a sick joke," said Scott Long of Human Rights Watch, saying Iran tortures gays under a penal code that punishes homosexuality between men with the death penalty.

When Ahmadinejad, speaking in Farsi, actually tried to crack a joke, it drew no laughter, although maybe the nuance was lost in translation.

"Let me tell a joke here," Ahmadinejad said. "I think the politicians who are after atomic bombs, or testing them, making them, politically they are backward, retarded."

The crowd seemed uncertain how to react. Some applauded that pacifist sentiment, others seemed befuddled by the insensitive use of the word retarded.


Ahmadinejad's visit here was preceded by a deluge of objections when it became apparent he wanted to lay a wreath at Ground Zero and that he would speak at Columbia.

Presidential candidates from both major U.S political parties took swipes at the president of a country President George W. Bush calls part of "the axis of evil." They said he denied the Holocaust, supported terrorism and armed Iraqi insurgents.

New York City councilman Anthony Weiner had a different way of capturing all that.

"Sometimes we have snakes slithering through the streets of New York," Weiner told protesters outside the United Nations, where Ahmadinejad will speak on Tuesday.

And in a city known for its blunt manners, the Iranian president's reception was bound to be frosty. The New York Daily News had the front page headline, "The Evil Has Landed."

At Columbia, university President Lee Bollinger pulled no punches. He called him a "petty and cruel dictator" and said his Holocaust denials suggested he was either "brazenly provocative or astonishingly uneducated."

"I feel the weight of the modern civilized world yearning to express the revulsion at what you stand for," Bollinger said to loud applause.

In retort, Ahmadinejad berated Bollinger as a rude host.

"Many parts of his speech were insults," he said. "We actually respect our students and the professors by allowing them to make their own judgments."

Not everybody objected to his speaking appearance.

"If the (Columbia) president thinks it's a good idea to have the leader from Iran come and talk to the students as an educational experience, I guess it's OK with me," Bush told Fox News.


(Additional reporting by Claudia Parsons, Michael Erman, Michelle Nichols and Megan Davies)
About Us

Monday, September 24, 2007

Apparently Bollinger Interrogates Ahmadinejad Like a Right Winger

The Blogger “Vanderleun” of American Digest weighs in on all the talk about Ahmadinejad being invited and speaking at Columbia University.

Vanderleun says he was against before he was for it.

Just kidding! Really, no “seriously” is a better word.

The Conservative Blogs (of which I am a part of by association) skewered Columbia University’s President Bollinger for inviting and giving Ahmadinejad a forum to validate the extreme radical Shia/political Mohammedanism of which the Iranian President represents.

Although I never blogged on the issue, I did read plenty who did. And I have to admit I joined in the realm of outrage and agreed with the criticism Bollinger was receiving. I even came close to signing an Internet petition to vent my displeasure over Ahmadinejad’s appointment on American soil by invitation of an esteemed Ivy League Academic institution known as Columbia University.

Unlike Vanderleun, I did not watch the whole affair feeling it would accomplish little.

However if Vanderleun is correct (I have not corroborating reports as yet), Bollinger was the victim (at least in this case) of judgment before actual assessment.

Apparently Bollinger asked some to the point precise questions that answers would demonstrate the true nature to Americans of Ahmadinejad’s way of thinking.

Here is
Vanderleun’s blog post:

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Old Brother Alan Keyes Declares Candidacy for President

Well I was checking some old email and discovered that Alan Keyes has announced he is running for the Republican nomination for President.

Now here is a guy that some serious conservative credential and not only is a part of the Christian Right, Keyes is extremely to the Christian Right.

I like Keyes however the man is unelectable. He is beginning to get the Ralph Nader stigma: Every Presidential election that comes along in which a Republican is not in Office Keyes signs up for the election race.

Also Keyes is too Christian to appeal to Middle American voters. Conservatives and Liberals have different interpretations of the “Separation of Church and State” concept nonetheless both sides subscribe to the paradigm.

The faith of Keyes is endearing to me but it raises red flags to voters of imposing Church Doctrine rather than political solutions. Too bad, America needs a healthy shot of religion to counter Secular Humanism which thrives on the Church/State paradigm.

Keyes also has some quirky ideas that you can
read about at World Net Daily that also will make him unelectable even though they are of an honorable nature.

UBL’s Call to depose Musharraf Could Lead to Global Chaos

Well have you heard the latest Islamofascist tiff? Usama bin Laden is calling President Musharraf of Pakistan an infidel thereby reasoning that Pakistan should rise up and revolt against him.

Now here is the thing. I can just imagine all the pro-Arab experts saying I told so, Musharraf’s regime as an ally to America is hanging by a thread and it may collapse placing nuclear arms into Islamofascist hands.

Maybe; however that is a worse case scenario. There is another extreme possibility. The other Arab Kingdoms and Dictatorships fearing a UBL led nuclear armed Wahhabi Pakistan and a nuclear arming radical Twelver Shia Iran might be the card played that may topple their autocratic gigs.

I can see the Saudi’s, Jordanians, the more capitalistic oil Saudi Peninsula Sheikdoms and Egypt (O yes Egypt) taking a cooperative stand against internal Wahhabis and Muslim Brotherhood factions and weighing in with support for Musharraf.

Again Iraq becomes the wild card. Why? The reason is because of its divided nature of Sunni, Kurd and Shia not piecing together as a hoped for uniform puzzle.

A not much talked about is a still powerful Turkey, the remnant of the last Muslim Empire to terrorize the globe with Mohammedanism.

Turkey figures in because Ataturk’s secular revolution that booted out its last Emperor and terminated the Caliphate will have to choose sides. You would think it would be a no-brainer that Turkey would line up with an American led Arab coalition against Islamofascists; however Turkey has two considerations:

    1. The hated Kurds trying to establish an independent nation of the current Northern Iraq.

    2. The modern electoral process has placed an Islamist head of government in secular Turkey. If he calls the shots on foreign relations, at best Turkey would stay out the conflict at worst Turkey would help the coalescing Sunni/Shia (i.e. a Wahhabi-Taliban ruled Pakistan if Musharraf cannot hold on and the Twelver Shias of Iran).

To complicate the reading of Turkey’s direction further, the Turkish generals have not hesitated in the past to boot out an elected leader if he did not comply to the beloved Ataturk secular revolution.

You might say a Wahhabi-Taliban terrorist will not get along with an Iranian radical Shia nation because the hatred between the two sects has existed since the assassination of Mohammed’s nephew (and I think son-in-law by marriage). The irony is Iran has been playing the enemy of my enemy is my friend game.

Iran has openly aided al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan (even protecting some al Qaeda elites and UBL’s family). Plus Iran has been training Sunni Hamas the official offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt.

Here is another chaotic scenario to add: Certainly the Saudi royals will line up with America because the West pays them the money for their oil to make the royals ridiculously wealthy. However a significant amount of the royals and wealthy Saudi elites only give lip service to the Wahhabi dominating school of the Saudi Peninsula by providing money for the Wahhabi leadership. BUT the Saudi government leadership is socially Western outside the borders of Saudi Arabia.

A prince of a Saudi bloodline that has totally conformed to the Wahhabi way may be developed as a usurper of the throne by the typical Mohammedan way of securing power: killing all the rivals to power.

If that scenario was permitted to occur then a huge mess could begin that might last years or seconds depending if a button pushing Islamist finds a nuclear arsenal.

And that is just the intra-regional conflict.

Due to the entire world running on oil; I guarantee China and Russia will decide what benefits their respective national interests and may line up with the Islamists for a trade guarantee of oil for weaponry.

O did I mention that Hindu dominated India is a nuclear power as well. India has been cozy with Russia and contemptuous of China; however I strongly suspect Hindu India will align with the faction (i.e. Western coalition led Arabs) that prevents the hated Muslims from gaining a toe hold on India’s land. There is much bad blood between Hindus and Muslims that actually may make the Jewish/Muslim conflict look like a picnic.

Conquering Mohammedans would slaughter and torture Hindus until they realized it was more profitable to enslave them with humiliation (contrary to their Quran). Thus the Muslim Mughal Empire of Northern India humiliated Hindus until the British came along. That was a long time!

Jews and Christians humiliated for their faith under conquering Muslims; however in the Quran they were named as people of the book. That meant according to the Muslim Scriptures Jews and Christians had three choices of lifestyle after conquest: Conversion to Islam, substandard humiliating no rights as dhimmi paying a jizya tax, or death.

The Hindus are considered polytheists; therefore their only (initial) choices were conversion or death.

Now this has been a very simplistic run down of what the fuse lit by UBL could do calling for a revolution in Pakistan and naming U.S. ally Musharraf an apostate. I am certain someone with more expertise could add to the complexity of developing scenarios in the Middle East and the interconnectedness of a globalized economy; nonetheless I am also certain you get the picture of what is impending. And take note: As the Middle East conflagrates in conflict, who lines up with whom is far from etched in stone. The National Interests of the moment will form the puzzle of who sides with whom in the greater scheme of the clear mutual enemies.

Friday, September 21, 2007

It is Clich̩, but Really РAmerica Needs to Focus on the Islamist in our Midst

I was reading about Lars Vilks being exonerated from incitement to hate speech by a Swedish Justice Chancellor. Free Speech in Europe is not regarded with the same sanctity as in America thus Vilks overcame a major challenge to Free Speech.

Evidently some Mohammedan organizations had asked the Free Speech watch dog in Sweden to indict Vilks on “agitation against an ethnic group.”

I was going to run with the angle of Vilks being vindicated of the right to utilize Free Speech. The Justice Chancellor ruled satire is not an overt insult even though it may be taken as such by an ethnicity. Basically the Justice Chancellor implied a big GET OVER IT.

The thing that struck me was the discovery of a music video that was broadcast by Hamas controlled Al-Aqsa TV in Hamastan … err … I mean the Gaza Strip September 19.

The Vilks article I had read was about Vilks and Mohammedan intolerance however
the music video was propaganda praising Hamas and there efforts to spread chunks of Jewish meat.

I watched the video which has an English subtitle translated by
MEMRI TV from the Arabic. It is a heinous example of hate speech that definitely incites “agitation against an ethnic group.” There is zero satire in the music video. After a vivid portrayal in song and video of Hamas training (in sky masks) glorying in the intention of murdering Jews (Can you say Nazi Final Solution?), the post script to the music video is a dedication to the Arab and Palestinian community in Sweden.

Hello Europeans. Hello Swedish people. This is a reference to the death bounty placed on the head of Lars Vilks for drawing the Modoggie cartoons. The threat will have to make Vilks watch his back for some time to come. Mohammedans are quite serious about their intolerance and exacting murder to bring that good feeling about themselves for defending their faith from perceived verbal insults.

Then a realization hit my mind like a ton of bricks.

All this
Holy Land Discovery (HLF) discovery being made public about the Muslim Brotherhood having an agenda to Islamicize America coupled with the reason for the prosecution of the HLF – Acquiring American donations and funneling it to Hamas; reminded me Muslim Americans are actually fueling this hatred from money earned in America and illegally distributed to Hamas for their Islamofascist crimes.

Friends the War on Terror is not just a concern about the war in Iraq. These terrorist organizations are transnational in nature and growing more confident in an agenda that I pray is utopian and unrealizable: the striking of fear via terrorism combined with the infiltration of Western Democrat/Liberty infrastructures to utilize our way of life to heinously and deceptively destroy the American way of life.

As write this piece the Mainstream Media (MSM) and even Fox News is focusing more on nabbing O.J. Simpson by any legal means necessary to make up for past botched up trials rather than the significance of the
Holy Land Foundation and the HUGE list of named unindicted co-conspirators that connects to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Which is more relevant to the lives of Americans: a former All-Pro football player spiraling toward a dead end life or the security and the protection of the American way of life from International/transnational conspiracists?

Dear God in Heaven, one of the big dog financiers (Ahmadinejad) of transnational Islamofascist terrorism
is attempting to visit the 9/11 site in New York City to lay a wreath for the dead. And I don’t know about you but that smacks more of gloating than remorse for the deaths of Americans on their own soil working to making a living for self and family.

Dear God in Heaven let’s view a MSM press focus on the infiltration of Islamists in America. Let’s forsake the stigma of the fear of not being politically correct enough to expose these organized fifth column designs to subvert America.

In the beginning of such a campaign a few innocent Mohammedans that love America may get hurt; however it will force the hand of the so-called silent majority of Mohammedans to be more vocal of their denunciation of Mohammedan organizations that claim to represent Mohammedan interests and civil rights in America. The reality is a significant amount of Mohammedan organizations (most prominently CAIR) are less concerned for Muslim-American civil rights than they are in manipulating America’s system to Islamofy America and persuade moderates toward Islamist Theo-Political ideology.

I am all for joining Moderate Muslim-Americans to expose and aiding in the prosecution and if need be expulsion of insidious Islamists in America. When Muslim-Americans truly act a part of America, i.e. assimilate to American culture; THEN the beginning of the end of the War on Terror will occur.

As long as Islamist Theo-Political ideology dominates the Mosques and madrassas in America then moderate Muslim transformation toward inner peace rather than violent outward assertion will not occur.

Honestly the silent majority of moderate Muslims must become vocally active like
Youssef Ibrahim or Islamism will be the growing and dominating force behind modern Islam. If the minority Islamists begin to dominate their culture as the minority Nazi movement began to dominate Germany in the “30”s, then there will be global blood and unimaginable loss of human life.

Krauthammer: Middle East volcano about to erupt?

Krauthammer on the enigmatic Israeli air strike on something or some place in Syria: he believes it may portend ominous military confrontations in the future of the Middle East.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Fjordman Introduction to Essay:

Fjordman Introduction to Essay: Islam, the Greeks and the Scientific Revolution, part 1
© September 20, 2007

Fjordman is a pseudonym for a European blogger/essayist that I have read is from Sweden and other places from Norway. I am certain many know who he really is for Fjordman is often a guest blogger and writer for Conservative and anti-Islam(ist) blogs.

I suspect he values his anonymity because for a European he is a rare breed: Fjordman is a conservative right winger that is extremely critical of Islam. This means he has many enemies which are both European (Leftist egalitarians) and Mohammedan nut cases that are easily enraged by criticism of their religion and their prophet.

The European would like to hunt down the anonymous Fjordman and prosecute him for inciting hate speech. Europeans have a different understanding of Freedom of Speech than Americans.

The Mohammedan would like to hunt down the anonymous Fjordman and more than likely simply assassinate him.

So I offer kudos to those who are able to keep his identity secret.

I have read some of Fjordman’s essays and I have to admit, I am a big fan. I may disagree with some things. For instance I vaguely recall Fjordman is a little critical of Christianity for allowing European foundations to slip away. Nonetheless Fjordman’s critique of the dangers Islam present to Western culture is in my opinion spot on.

Courtesy of
Klein Verzet Blog I have been alerted of part one of a Fjordman series that is posted on Dhimmi Watch by Robert Spencer (A Winds of Change Essay provides the appellation of “Fjordmen” to those of the like of Robert Spencer that crusade to expose the truth of Islam – I like the terminology.).

The series is entitled, “Fjordman: Islam, the Greeks and the Scientific Revolution, Part 1.” I encourage you to keep your eyes open for whatever Parts that may follow. I kind of post these things are link to them by running into them by happenstance. If I run into the other Parts in the series I will post them or link to them (sometimes Fjordman is so full of information he can be verbose). If I do miss them, keep in mind Fjordman is everywhere. He writes mainly in the
Brussels Journal and the Gates of Vienna this essay is at Dhimmi Watch which is a sister blog to Spencer’s Jihad Watch (quite a pedigree huh?).

Fjordman: Islam, the Greeks and the Scientific Revolution, part 1 [on Dhimmi Watch]

Here Come the Intra-Party Attacks on Fred

Now here is a guy who does not like Fred Thompson for President (or maybe I should say couple).

In an article I read by Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, Fred is skewered by a number of citations of low moments of Thompson’s Conservative credentials.

The Morris/McGann article endorses Giuliani or McCain on there credentials on Security.

The Morris/McGann article proclaims Thompson’s stand on social issues and film/TV making fame are not issues to become elected as President.

Morris/McGann concedes to Hillary Clinton as President anyway and they reason why should we vote for a Republican candidate that has core Conservative social values?

Hmm … Let me think about that.

The issues Morris/McGann brings up are compelling; nonetheless the social issues facing America will make or break her from the inside out. I seem to remember a more famous Hollywood actor also called to horribly uninformed, inexperienced and way too trigger happy to qualify as President.

Only time will tell if Thompson has the chutzpa President Reagan had; however it is the social issues and the terrorist issues combined Americans should be thinking about. Can anyone claim Thompson is cut-n-run or anti-victory in the War on Terror?

I will vote for any Republican that wins the nomination, but I hope it is Thompson.

Youssef Ibrahim: The Islamist Trojan Horse

Youssef Ibrahim is quickly becoming my favorite representative of an emerging vocal (yet mostly silent) Moderate Muslims denouncing the acts and ideology of Islamist terrorism. A few days ago I posted an article by him entitled, “The Saudi Reign of Terror.” He is doing more actively to dispel the victimization of Islamophobia that moderate Muslims probably feel than the so-called Mohammedan civil rights organizations such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations who purport to be the voice of Mohammedanism in America.

That is scary since many of the Mohammedan organizations aligned on the same track as CAIR are either indicted criminals or unindicted co-conspirators in crimes of
supporting foreign Islamist terrorists with money garnered on American soil. The Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial in Dallas for whatever actual charges are against them has brought to the surface documents that outline the demise of the United States government.

Youssef Ibrahim is now writing about “
The Islamist Trojan Horse.” Ibrahim rails to the Left and Right political spectrum about arguing the danger of foreign terrorist in foreign wars however the fact is the Islamists are already here. “HERE” being the United States of America: the bastion of Liberty, Freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness.

The Islamists ARE HERE to end Liberty, Freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness by replacing those Western concepts with intolerant Mohammedanism and the oppressive Theo-political ideology of medieval Sharia Law.

(Hat tip to Don Moore of
Blind Conservatives)


Ok here is some God Humor.
I found it hilarious; I hope you do as well.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Islam Parody

I used to have this in my favorites at YouTube; however YouTube dhimmied up to the will of Mohammedanism and removed it.

I do have to be honest, for a Mohammedan this is extremely offensive.
It is all in the Quran and the Hadith though; it is just skewed toward anti-jihad thinking. Islam’s history is violent and tragic toward its victims. Although statisticians claim the majority of Mohammedans do not adhere to the medievalism of the past, it is still the form of Mohammedanism practiced in the past and highly supported by jihadi/Islamist terrorists of the 21st century.

Thanks to
Justify This.

Muslim Brotherhood Transnational Project Comes to America

Stop The ACLU has a running commentary and some excellent links to other blogs relating to The Dallas Morning News story “What the Muslim Brotherhood means for the U.S.” that I posted This Dallas Morning News story about information derived from the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial pertaining to fifth column plans by the Muslim Brotherhood to undermine America and force conversion to Mohammedanism is entitled “Muslim Brotherhood’s Papers Detail Plan To Seize U.S.

Stop The ACLU/Dallas Morning News story establishes the insidiousness of radical Islamism directly on American soil within the United States of America. This is the Islamist attitude the Democratic Party in America wishes to cut-n-run from. If the Democratic Party agenda is elected by American voters expect Islamists to be more determined to activate the Muslim Brotherhood agenda to Islamicize America as the HLF trial reveals in exposed documents.

I am not surprised about the discovery of a Muslim Brotherhood agenda for America. In November 2001 (two months after 9/11)
Swiss authorities discovered an aged document from the ‘80’s from the Muslim Brotherhood entitled “The Project.” “The Project” is a Muslim Brotherhood document outlining a fifth column option of dominating the world via clandestine transnational infiltration to spread Islam and recreate the Caliphate.

Undoubtedly the document finding the light of day via the HLF trial is a part of “The Project” agenda.

The Muslim Brotherhood (
which incredibly has Hitler’s Nazi imprint) has a two-fold agenda: 1) Create chaos globally via terrorism. 2) Utilize transnational infiltration to simultaneously subvert non-Mohammedan nations and make a transition to Mohammedanism within the State infrastructure beginning with Mohammedan organizations.

Again, undoubtedly that is the reason to seeing so many Mohammedan organizations listed as unindicted co-conspirators with the HLF in that trial taking place in Dallas, TX.

Here is a PDF document listing Mohammedan individuals and Mohammedan organizations as unindicted co-conspirators:

Note there are some organizations that the U.S. Government has extended the exchange of information and have used as a consulting vehicle for the FBI and Counter-Terrorism Intelligence services within the government. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is the so-called moderate defender of Mohammedan civil rights in America.

If CAIR has access to the Federal Government and claims to be a civil rights advocate for American Mohammedans then an obvious question should arise. Is CAIR actually protecting the civil rights of Americans that followers of Mohammedanism OR is CAIR facilitating the two part agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood and “The Project?”

I am just picking on CAIR here. This leads to another question: What if other Mohammedan organizations and the Mohammedan supporters of these organizations are also carrying out the Muslim Brotherhood agenda of “The Project?”

My God America! WAKE UP!

[See Also this
perspective of the Muslim Brotherhood.]