14 Year Old Assyrian Boy Decapitated By Muslim GroupPosted GMT 10-29-2006 20:14:18
(AINA) -- According to the Assyrian website ankawa.com, a 14 year old Christian Assyrian boy, Ayad Tariq, from Baqouba, Iraq was decapitated at his work place on October 21.
Ayad Tariq was working his 12 hour shift, maintaining an electric generator, when a group of disguised Muslim insurgents walked in at the beginning of his shift shortly after 6 a.m. and asked him for his ID.
According to another employee who witnessed the events, and who hid when he saw the insurgents approach, the insurgents questioned Ayad after seeing that his ID stated "Christian", asking if he was truly a "Christian sinner." Ayad replied "yes, I am Christian but I am not a sinner." The insurgents quickly said this is a "dirty Christian sinner!" Then they proceeded to each hold one limb, shouting "Allahu akbar! Allahu akbar!" while beheading the boy.
Translated from Arabic by AINA
Tuesday, October 31, 2006
Senator Kerry is an example of what to expect if the Democrats win one or both Houses of Congress. Kerry and the Democrats will simply lose the war because they consider the brave men and women of the military to be dummies.
That is right folks, Kerry believes if you don't get an education will you go to Iraq. That is a typical anti-Vietnam statement moving to the 21st Century. Those who wished to avoid the draft in the 1960's and 1970's tried many games: homosexuality, Canada, or academics. Kerry gave a speech in California indicating the same old line: do well in school or go to Iraq.
The implication is only dummies sign up for the Service. One thing, there is no Draft today. A second thing, the military recruits just as heavily from colleges as they do from High Schools.
Could training PA President Abbas' Army backfire on the US also?
I strongly suspect that American training of Abbas' Presidential Guard is a huge mistake! The training is not only happening but the world's best Military is arming the Abbas mini-army.
America's past has been (and evidently continues) to pit the dictator that America hopes will tow the line on American National Interests against the dictator that undermines American National Interests. There have been successes and failures. Sometimes it worked out worked out as a success for a long number of years then ended in disaster to American National Interests.
Pinochet of Chile comes to mind. The Shah of Iran comes to mind. Much of Latin American politics comes to mind.
I do not think this is a good thing.
Mitt Romney may be a great moral guy, however he is a Mormon. Although Mormons have fooled many Christians that they are Christian, They have not in the slightest in common. Mormons do not believe Jesus is the Son of God as part of the Trinity - Father, Son and Holy Spirit (three persons in ONE God). Mormons believe that Jesus is a created son of God. They believe Satan is Jesus’ brother. In contradiction to the Revelation to John, old Joseph Smith wrote another gospel.
Monday, October 30, 2006
Rating Cities as Safe October 2006 Gallup Poll
Hat tip to Right Mind Blog.
Mohammedanism is beginning to taint American culture in the same way.
Here is a video Cindy Sheehan and her Sheehanistas should be strapped down to a chair to watch.
American Heroes have protected Liberty and Freedom in America with their blood, sweat and lives. The Cut-n-Run and Sheehanistas dishonor our Heroes. My God Sheehan’s own son is one of those Heroes.
Watch this video to see the link radical Mohammedanism has with the Nazis of World War II. Then continue to watch the video as Hero after Hero is listed followed by their exploits to protect American Liberty and Freedom.
Sunday, October 29, 2006
Mark Steyn illustrates that the Left and the Right need to awaken to the actual threat these jihadi maniacs present.
The Left loves to hate President Bush. I have to admit I myself have been a bit exasperated with some of his decisions. Unlike the Left my exasperation is due to not going far enough to expose radical Mohammedanism.
Love President Bush or hate him, he was the man for the job at this time.
Yes, the Crusaders did some aweful things; including to their fellow Christians who were not Catholic.
However, Fallaci points out that Mohammedans brutally attacked Christian lands way before the Crusades often brutally murdering whole populations until the rest converted. And we are not just talking Middle Eastern Christians.
Mohammedans from the time of the first Caliph after Mohammed through the Ottoman Turks raided, murdered, raped, kidnapped and more to Christians in Europe until Jan Sobieski put the Ottomans in their place in the 1600's at Vienna.
Western liberals have bought into the myth were solely culpable for the destruction accredited to them. The reality is that the Crusaders were more the result of a response to Mohammedan brutality.
The Crusaders were HEROES.
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor without warning. Japan introduced suicide warfare with their Kamikazes flying into U.S. Naval ships. Japan did not even try to hide brutality executed on American, British and Australian POW's.
Japan was a vicious enemy.
Here we are now in the twenty-first century and Japan may be the key to sustaining global Western style democracy.
Read Bruce Walker’s analysis of the globe's possible geo-political future HERE.
Saturday, October 28, 2006
Friends President Bush and Prime Minister al-Maliki have made a joint statement relating to a partnership of Democracy between the U.S. and Iraq. Without providing specifics committees are being formed to determine and actuate a self-determining Iraq.
There are way too many people and national agendas that do not a Democratic unified Iraq. The Democratic Party of America would rather leave Iraq and watch it disintegrate like South Vietnam did. There are huge contingents of Iraqis that hate each other fueled by Mohammedan outsiders that cannot stand to see an American success to engage Democracy in the Middle East.
If there are truly moderate Mohammedans that wish to have a strong self-determining government, democracy is the way. Can the Sunnis who have been used to the favor of Islamofascist rule overcome their dread of a Shia majority? Can the nationalistic minded Kurds overcome the pain of persecution by both Sunni and Shia? Can the Shia develop a realm of consensus instead of retribution and anger for being the target of Saddam's Islamofascism?
This can all happen for the good if the Mohammedans can think consensus rather than tribal and ideological differences. After all the concept of the Umma (or Community) of Mohammedans is supposed to be as central in their Quran as their hatred is for kafir and dhimmis. Once an Umma is developed in Iraq, then foreign insurgents must be dealt with.
This is what makes a Bush/al-Maliki statement so important.
Friday, October 27, 2006
When Israel invaded Lebanon to defend itself from Hezbollah, the Mainstream Media (MSM) was all about condemning Israel for the civilian casualties in Lebanon. It has now been verified that Hezbollah intentionally had an atrocious strategy to maximize Israeli civilian causalities. It was obvious Hezbollah was doing this while the confrontation was occurring; however now the paper trail exists that convicts Hezbollah of this strategy.
This is the introduction from The Plebeian Blog. Plebius posts from the Washington Times on how Hezbollah purposefully and with intent developed a combative strategy to murder the innocent of Israel.
Will the MSM report this paper trail of Mohammedan Islamofascists? I sincerely doubt that will be the case. The MSM blatantly supports murderous Mohammedans to the detriment of the only Western style democracy in the Middle East. Could there be a tinge of anti-Semitism?
I would like to give the MSM the benefit of the doubt and at least think their anti-Semitic slanted reports are the unconscious delusion of secular humanist deception. The deception is buying into the Mohammedan propaganda that Israel is an occupying nation that is the cause of Middle East conflict. That is evil deception of mainstream Mohammedanism and radical alike.
Wednesday, October 25, 2006
I was surfing at Hot Air Blog in which they post an audio link on how Teddy (Chappaquidic) Kennedy was a Balaam to American help the former U.S.S.R. to muddle U.S. foreign policy under both President Carter and President Reagan.
The audio: Download the mp3
In case you do not know who Balaam is, that was the old boy that who tricked Israeli leaders to sin. That was the only way the Israel's enemies could defeat Israel; only if sin could cause God to withdraw His protection.
Kennedy betrayed his nation for power (or the at least the attempt), and he used the former Soviet Union to do so.
What is the smoking gun? A memo discovered in old Soviet archives was discovered when Boris Yeltsin opened the archives to hold back Communist Party intrigue to regain power in Russia.
Read the details HERE.
Has anyone heard of this? I know Kennedy is bad for America with slanted left thinking, but I had NO idea there was a paper trail that could indicate cooperation with America's former Cold War enemy. Isn't that espionage?
Phares rightly claims that Left Wing Academics and Journalists have failed America and Europe in educating people as to the ultimate goal of why Islamofascist terrorists are on a murdering rampage.
Islamofascists listen and read Western media. The message the Islamofascists receive is that Westerners are weak and are a target for Mohammedan jihad as well as Mohammedan domination. The Islamofascist Jihadist wish to return to the pristine days of bloodshed, conquest, humiliation and rape of non-believing kafir.
When will the West and America wake up! Let us unite on this one thing and pull a Charles Martel. A victory has to occur that is so decisive, that the terrorists scramble back to their cockroach holes.
Tuesday, October 24, 2006
(Say (O Muhammad SAW): "O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians): Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but Allah, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides Allah. Then, if they turn away,say: "Bear witness that we are Muslims.") Holy Quran 3:64
...fight in the way of Allah with those who fight with you...[2.191] And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers. Excerpt K 2:190-191 Set 2, Count 3+4The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His apostle and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned [Pickthall and Yusuf Ali have "exiled" rather than "imprisoned"] Excerpt K 5:033 Set 21, Count 54
...make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. Excerpt K 8:012 Set 28, Count 62
...slay the idolaters wherever you find them...take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush... Excerpt K 9:005 Set 33, Count 91
Fight those who do not believe in Allah...nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection. Excerpt K 9:029 Set 38, Count 101
[33.25]...Allah sufficed the believers in fighting... [33.26]...some [Jews] you killed and you took captive another part. [33.27]...He made you heirs to their [Jewish] land and their dwellings and their property, and (to) a land which you have not yet trodden... Excerpt K 33:25-27 Set 66, Count 131-133
...those [captive women] whom your right hand possesses [i.e., by virtue of the sword used in Jihad] out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war... Excerpt K 33:050 Set 67, Count 134
...when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners, and afterwards either set them free as a favor or let them ransom (themselves) until the war terminates...(as for) those who are slain in the way of Allah... Excerpt K 47:004 Set 69, Count 136
[48.15] Pickthall: ...when you set forth to capture booty...[48.16]...You shall soon be invited (to fight) against a people possessing mighty prowess; you will fight against them until they submit...[48.17] Pickthall: There is no blame...for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeys Allah and His messenger [by going on Jihad], He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turns back [from Jihad], him will He punish with a painful doom. [48.18] Certainly Allah was well pleased with the believers when they swore allegiance to you under the tree, and He knew what was in their hearts, so He sent down tranquility on them and rewarded them with a near victory, [48.19] And much booty that they will capture. Allah is ever Mighty, Wise. [48.20] Allah promised you many acquisitions which you will take, then He hastened on this one for you and held back the hands of men from you, and that it may be a sign for the believers and that He may guide you on a right path. [48.21] Sale: And [he also promiseth you] other [spoils], which ye have not [yet] been able [to take]: But now hath God encompassed them [for you]; and God is almighty. [48.22] And if those who disbelieve fight with you, they would certainly turn (their) backs, then they would not find any protector or a helper. [48.23] Such [i.e., the Jihad mentioned the previous verse] has been the course [practice] of Allah that has indeed run before, and you shall not find a change in Allah’s course. [48.24] And He [Allah] it is Who held back...your hands from them [in Jihad] in the valley of Mecca... Excerpt K 48:15-24 Set 72, Count 139-148
Toward the end of her post she writes how the Indonesian government has released two Mohammedan terrorists involved in the bombing in Bali. The reason this caught my attention is because this same Indonesian government recently executed two Indonesian Christians.
The crime of the Christians: while being attacked by Mohammedan mobs, they killed some of them in self-defense. They were given a rubber stamp trial in which redeeming evidence was not allowed to be presented. Previous magistrates involved had actually stalled their execution due to other governments and pleas to their embassies to halt the execution.
This did not bode well with the magistrates superiors. The magistrates were simply replaced with bureaucrats prepared to march to the tune of the central government Indonesian elites. Shortly, the Christians were executed.
I am incensed by the leeway Western governments provide this one-sided mercy for Mohammedans and execution of non-Mohammedans. This not only happens in Indonesia of course. The entire Middle East is given a pass and Western governments go out of their way to not make public Mohammedan hatred of Western culture in the very West Mohammedans have adopted as home.
It is almost like Western governments so happy to suppress Christianity as a Church/State issue mindlessly accommodates Mohammedan intrusions in the same Church/State issues. It is ridiculous and heinous.
Sunday, October 22, 2006
This is not necessarily a complimentary article on neo-conservatives. I think there is an attempt to be neutral but I think the word “neo-conservative” is used as a negative connotation by Lobe. Lobe does a pretty good job of portraying the neo-conservative opinion on North Korea. In that vain it is well worth the read.
U.S. Neo-Cons Call For Japanese Nukes, Regime Change
October 11, 2006
Inter Press Service News Agency
WASHINGTON, Oct 11 (IPS) - Encouraging Japan to build nuclear weapons, shipping food aid via submarines, and running secret sabotage operations inside North Korea's borders are among a raft of policy prescriptions pushed by prominent U.S. neo-conservatives in the wake of Pyongyang's nuclear test.
Writing in publications from National Review Online (NRO) to the New York Times, neo-conservatives claim, contrary to the lessons drawn by "realist" and other critics of the George W. Bush administration, that Monday's test vindicates their long-held view that negotiations with "rogue" states like North Korea are useless and that "regime change" -- by military means, if necessary -- is the only answer. "
With our intelligence on North Korea so uneven, the doctrine of pre-emption must return to the fore," wrote Dan Blumenthal, an Asia specialist at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) who worked for Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld during Bush's first term, in the NRO Tuesday. "Any talk of renewed six-party talks [involving China, Japan, Russia, the U.S. and the two Koreas] must be resisted."
The North Korean test "has stripped any plausibility to arguments that engaging dictators works," according to Michael Rubin, a Middle East specialist at AEI, who added that the Bush administration now faces a "watershed" in its relations with other states that have defied Washington in recent years.
"This crisis is not just about North Korea, but about Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and Cuba as well," according to Rubin. "Bush now has two choices: to respond forcefully and show that defiance has consequence, or affirm that defiance pays and that international will is illusionary.
"…(He) must now choose whether his legacy will be one of inaction or leadership, Chamberlain or Churchill," he added in a reference to the pre-World War II debate between the "appeasement" of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and the war policy of his successor, Winston Churchill.
The neo-conservatives, whose influence on the Bush administration has generally been on the wane since late 2003 when it became clear that the Iraq war that they had done so much to champion was going badly, nonetheless retain some clout, particularly through the offices of Vice President Dick Cheney and Pentagon chief Rumsfeld.
They are opposed by the "realists" who are concentrated in the State Department and also include former secretary of state Colin Powell; his chief deputy, Richard Armacost; and a number of top national security officials in the administration of former President George H.W. Bush, such as former national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, and secretary of state James Baker, who just last weekend publicly called for Washington to directly engage its "enemies", including North Korea, Syria and Iran.
That stance is anathema to the neo-conservatives and their right-wing allies, such as Cheney, who, at one national security council meeting on North Korea several years ago, was reported to have said, "We don't negotiate with evil; we defeat it."
The neo-conservatives' main area of concern has historically been the Middle East -- indeed, their central focus in recent months has been publicising the threats to the U.S. and Israel allegedly posed by Iran and Hezbollah and opposing any realist appeals to engage Tehran and Damascus in direct talks. But they have also been warning for some time against "the appeasement" of North Korea and its chief source of material aid and support, China.
In their view, Beijing has always had the power to force Pyongyang to give up its nuclear arms programmes, and the fact that it has not done so demonstrates that China sees itself as a "strategic rival" of Washington, a phrase much favoured by administration hawks during Bush's first year in office.
Indeed, in the most prominent neo-conservative reaction to the North Korean test to date, former Bush speechwriter David Frum called in a column published by the New York Times for the administration to take a series of measures designed to "punish China" for its failure to bring Pyongyang to heel.
Among them, Frum, who is also based at AEI and is sometimes credited with inventing the phrase "axis of evil", in which North Korea, Iran, and Iraq were lumped together, for Bush's 2002 State of the Union address, urged the administration to cut off all humanitarian aid to North Korea, pressure South Korea to do the same, and thus force China to "shoulder the cost of helping to avert" North Korea's economic collapse.
Frum, who is also based at AEI, urged that Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore to be invited to join NATO and that Taiwan, which China regards as a renegade province, to send observers to NATO meetings.
Frum, who in 2003 co-authored "An End to Evil" with former Defence Policy Board chairman, also suggested that Washington "encourage Japan to renounce the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and create its own nuclear deterrent."
"A nuclear Japan is the thing China and North Korea dread most (after, perhaps, a nuclear South Korea or Taiwan)," he asserted.
"Not only would the nuclearization of Japan be a punishment of China and North Korea," he wrote, "but it would also go far to meet our goal of dissuading Iran (from trying to obtain a nuclear weapons)... The analogue for Iran, of course, would be the threat of American aid to improve Israel's capacity to hit targets with nuclear weapons," according to Frum.
Other neo-conservatives echoed Blumenthal's position that the Six-Party Talks should be abandoned and called for the administration to resist any further appeals for bilateral talks between Washington and Pyongyang -- repeatedly made by China, South Korea, and Russia, as well as by realists here, over the past several years.
"There will be renewed calls for bilateral talks between Washington and Pyongyang. That would be a mistake." according to the lead editorial in the neo-conservative Wall Street Journal, which also urged the U.S. to "make clear that a military response is not off the table."
Other commentators called for strong efforts to achieve regime change. James Robbins, senior fellow at the American Foreign Policy Council, called for covert action, including "sabotage, espionage, information operations, subversion, deception -- the works. A highly paranoid totalitarian regime like Kim (Jong Il's) will be highly susceptible to these methods," he predicted.
At the same time, former House Speaker and DPB member Newt Gingrich, who is also based at AEI, said he favoured continuing shipments of U.S. food aid but through a covert delivery system "consciously designed to undermine the dictatorship".
"Food might be parachuted into the country, delivered from submarines and small boats by clandestine services, shipped in from China and Russia through anti-regime middlemen and delivered in every way possible to divert energy and authority away from the government and toward an alternative organising system of individuals dedicated to a better more prosperous life," he wrote.
Like his fellow-neo-conservatives, Frank Gaffney, the president of the Centre for Security Policy, called for accelerated development and deployment of Washington's embryonic but extraordinarily costly missile defence system, including a ship-launched system that can shoot down ballistic missiles of various ranges "whether launched from places like North Korea or from tramp steamers off our coasts."
He also urged Washington to resume periodic underground nuclear tests of its own, ending a moratorium on such testing announced by former President George H.W. Bush in 1992. (END/2006)
Copyright © 2006 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved.
Someone at the Minuteman Blog found an AP story that reports that Mexican Gangs are imitating psycho Islamofascist terrorists by beheading people.
Apparently these thugs are carving out fiefdoms by using fear. It is working. In many areas up half of local police forces have quit due to death threats. People do not help authorities out of fear they will join the beheaded.
Mexican Gang lords are prominent in illegal alien border crossing to America. The Gangs are becoming well armed. One wonders how or where the arms are coming from? If the Mexican is that corrupt that it allows organized and reprehensible criminals to acquire high grade weapons, then there should be a huge fall out between the U.S. government and the Mexican government.
I am no expert, but I have an idea the arms are coming from well monied Islamofascists coupled with a corrupt Mexican infrastructure. America needs to be more aggressive in protecting the American/Mexican border.
I have found one of the best explanations of the relationship between Mohammedanism and the West that I have ever read. Bernard Lewis brings extreme clarity as to how the West and Mohammedanism have evolved by mutual influences.
This is a must read!
Lewis explains the current politics in the Middle East is not how the original Mohammedanism existed or practiced. Rulers though autocratic were not despotic. Political leaders often consulted various levels of the community (Umma) to proceed with a decision.
Lewis says this changed with Western influence. Modern Mohammedan leaders were painfully aware that their society was backward compared to the West. Turkey led the way by abolishing the Sultanate and the Caliphate to merge a Western style political structure into their Mohammedan State.
World War II affected the political evolvement in the rest of the Middle East. Lewis cites the French loss to Nazi Germany.
France essentially developed two governments: The government that surrendered to the Nazis became Vichy France and the government in exile led by De Gaul.
France was a huge colonial power prior to World War II. Many of their colonial holdings were Mohammedan. These colonial holdings were left to make a decision on their own. Most were too far away for enforcement by Vichy France, France in exile or the Nazis.
Amazingly the French colonial holdings across the globe chose the Vichy government. Of Course Vichy France was merely a puppet of Nazi Germany.
Many of the Arab leaders thus became influenced by the Nazi political system. After Germany's defeat it was not much of a stretch to adopt the despotic system of the old Soviet system.
Thus the political systems of the Middle East are not comparable to the political systems of the Mohammedan past.
That is Lewis' postulation.
Frankly, my opinion differs a little. I am sensing if the Umma would of have been untouched by the West, would still treat non-Mohammedans with contempt. On the other hand I am uncertain if Mohammedans untouched by Western influence would be global in terrorism. That might be a different story today.
Lewis also factors in the emergence of Wahhabism in Saudi Arabia. Really it is an awesome read. GO THERE!
Saturday, October 21, 2006
I have read views about Mohammedanism that criticize the death cult as intrinsically a political ideology with religious trappings. I myself had leaned that way to attempt to frame in my mind a difference between moderate Mohammedanism and radical Mohammedanism (Islamofascism or Islamism).
David Yerushalmi has written an essay discrediting the pure political view of Mohammedanism. Yerushalmi implies that Mohammedanism is natured toward brutality from its founder Mohammed.
The tenets of Mohammedanism sways toward violence and domination as Christian tenets sway toward the emphasis of God’s Love and personal Salvation.
Read the essay, it is awesome.
*******************************************************IMPORTANT PETITION BANNING PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION--YOUR HELP IS NEEDED
Good News Ministries
Yesterday, I turned on the TV to TBN, and felt compelled to watch something I do not ordinarily watch, and I know it was the Lord. The show was Rod Parsley on Breakthrough Ministry, and he was talking about the critical need for us to send our request to the Supreme Court regarding the petition on Partial Birth Abortion.
He said that on NOVEMBER 8, the justices of the Supreme Court will be hearing the case of Gonzalez vs. Carhart, which will determine once and for all the Partial Birth Abortion decision. Many people thought that it was already determined because President Bush had signed a document on it, BUT opposers to it have taken it to the Supreme Court, as you may know, for a final decision, and so it is imperative that we also pray for the hearts of these judges who will render their decision. Horrifying Details of a Partial Birth Abortion
I was so absolutely horrified when a former nurse who had actually worked in an abortion center, described in detail the procedure, and what she experienced while working there. When she went to work there, she was under the assumption that the babies would not be alive.
However, that assumption proved false. She described a situation where a 26-year old woman, who was the first client of the day, had been brought (dragged) to the center by her parents and husband, because she was to give birth to a down's syndrome baby, and they did not want the child, though she did. The 26-year old mother cried and cried, so the clinic decided to do her first. They gave her something to calm her down, so that she would not upset the other clients who were also there for abortions.
Once in the room, to the nurse's complete shock, she saw the doctor pull the child from the mother's cervix. He pulled the baby out, but left the head in three inches so that he could not be accused of "murder." The baby's heart was beating, it was moving, and its little feet were kicking. The baby was pulled out feet down--then the doctor took some scissors and plunged it into the back of the neck of the child at which point the nurse saw the child jerk and then go limp. The doctor then took a suction machine (a little bit like a vacuum cleaner) and sucked the brains out of the child and discarded them.
To the staff's surprise, the mother insisted on seeing her baby, so they wrapped up the baby, got her up, and presented it to her in a blanket. The mother screamed a horrific scream and cried hysterically, "God, forgive me--I did not want to do it!" The nurse said that after several more clients received the same procedure, she was so physically ill, she could never return again---and she is now speaking out against it. I was sickened to hear and see what was done, and to realize overwhelmingly the utter devastation of that "choice"--and just I wept and wept.
And that is why I am sending this to you, asking that you would consider making your voice heard to these justices as I have now done, by going to the website www.breakthrough.net, click on the link to the Partial Birth Abortion Petition, and signing the Partial Birth Petition.
Perhaps you have already signed others, but I really feel the urgency of making our voices heard, speaking life for those who have no voice...I ask that you link with me in prayer for these justices to uphold the constitution, and the 70% of Americans who do not want partial birth abortion, and for those who now know the truth of what is really being done in those abortion clinics in the name of "pro-choice."
Believe me, I know!!! I realize that some of you have been praying on these issues for a long time--and that it is the very heart of God.
Friday, October 20, 2006
The New York Times is yet again doing their best to act as a Fifth Column promoting Islamofascist strategy and belittling the American war effort in Iraq.
As many of you know the Left enjoys equating the War on Terrorism in Iraq to the Viet Nam War. The Viet Nam War is considered a loss because Americans left South Vietnam to fend for themselves. In the leaving, South Vietnam capitulated to the brutal North Vietnamese Communists.
Recently President Bush equated the current violence in Iraq to that of the Tet Offensive of North Vietnam in 1968. Now remember the U.S. left South Vietnam in 1973 and the South surrendered in 1975 (Time Line). Although U.S. forces were surprised by the North Vietnamese army and Viet Cong (South Viet Communists), American troops spanked the invaders pretty hard. That battle was not a loss. That battle had a large amount of American casualties and that is what the President was referring.
American casualties do not even come close to our Vietnamese experience. The casualty rate posted at Tom Rants has 20 Islamofascist terrorists dead to 1 American dead. Iraq is brutal but if we compare it to Vietnam, we are way ahead of the war which a victory for Iraq democracy and the American military.
Thursday, October 19, 2006
I wonder who the Texas Democrats are attempting to draw to the November elections with this campaign poster? There is the appearance that the Democrats are looking for a political victory with Illegal aliens as voters.
Mohammedans have been attacking Christians in Ethiopia. Apparently when old Mo's followers hit Christian Ethiopia they were unable to swash buckle all the Christians into Mohammedanism.
That was the bad news. Here is the surprising good news:
Evidently Mohammedans are beginning to speak up about the violence an murder of radical Islamism/Islamofascism. When I read news like this I have to consider turning on a dime and not loose that a peaceful globe can exist with Mo's followers and other faiths and ideologies.
Muslims Attack Christians in Henno, Ethiopia
October 19, 2006
WASHINGTON, Oct. 19 /Christian Newswire/ -- The Washington-DC based human rights group, International Christian Concern (ICC), www.persecution.org, has just been informed that on July 20, 7 Muslim leaders (clerics) brutally attacked 50 or more Christians in Henno, Ethiopia. This latest attack is just one example of the increasing violence against Christians in Ethiopia. In fact, Islamic leaders are urging Muslims in the area to kill full-time Christian evangelists. The situation has reached such intensity that Christian leaders are in fear and moving in pairs to ward off attacks. Local Muslim authorities failed to take action against the Muslim attackers.
Henno is located in the district of Kokosa of the Oromia region, 404 kilometers South of Addis Ababa.
In 2005, two prominent Muslims in Henno converted to Christianity: “H,” a well known Muslim leader, and “M,” the son of a well-respected Muslim tribal leader. The two conversions angered Muslim leaders in the surrounding region. On July 20, 2006, “M” hosted a worship service for the other Christians in Henno and invited a choir from the Sidama region.
The worship service gained the attention of the whole village, including Muslim leaders who responded violently by instigating a riot, using gangs in the area. The gangs were carrying local weapons such as knives, stones, and metal rods.
The Muslim leaders demanded the expulsion of the choir from the area. The new believer and former Muslim leader, “H,” refused to stop the service despite their pressure. Consequently, the crowd began to beat “H” and other Christians in the house with their weapons.
“H” was beaten badly, receiving five deep wounds to his head. Because he was beaten with an iron rod, he was also missing teeth. He suffered deep lacerations to his legs, where several ligaments protruded from the skin. “H’s” daughter-in-law was pregnant at the time but lost her baby because she was also severely beaten.
In total, twelve people were seriously injured; five others were found to have lacerations on their body and received medical treatment in Shashamene Kuyera Hospital. “H” also received care and has recovered from the attack.
The Christians reported the riot to the district government administrative office, which took no legal action. Instead, the officers warned Christians not to worship in a region that is predominately Muslim. It is important to note that all officers who heard the case were in fact Muslim. The case was then taken to a higher police authority. The police responded by arresting 26 gang members. However, they were released quickly because tribal elders appealed to the government.
An Encouraging Note
In the following weeks, many Muslims denounced the actions taken against the Christians. To express their disgust, Muslims refused to go to Mosques. In fact, forty-seven key leaders became Christians and renounced Islam stating, “If Islam means killing innocent brothers and sisters – we do not want to follow it!”
Please pray for the Christians in Henno, Ethiopia who are in need of your support in the midst of persecution from Muslim leaders who want to annihilate them. ICC encourages all concerned parties to contact the Ethiopian embassy in the United States, to respectfully express concern that the freedom of Christians in Ethiopia is not being sufficiently protected. You can contact them at the addresses and phone numbers listed below:
Embassy of Ethiopia
3506 International Dr. NW Washington, DC 20008
The above photo has Heinrich Himmler (infamous Nazi that committed suicide rather than face war crimes) and the Hitler and Himmler's buddy Grand Mufti al-Husseini (with rag on head).
Now here is some fascinating information from a Western point of view: Hitler’s Darling al-Husseini and the current Grand Mufti have similar names. Today’s Grand Mufti is Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Hussein.
Below is a post by Erick Stakelbeck, a CBN News Blogger:
Stakelbeck on Terror
October 18, 2006
New Jerusalem Mufti Endorses Suicide Bombings
America, meet the new "Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and the Palestinian Lands," Sheikh Muhammad Ahmad Hussein. His ascension sounds like another quantum leap forward in the peace process. From
YNet News (with extra relevant quotes boldfaced):
An informed Palestinian source told The Media Line that Hussein was "a simple man, born to a family of humble means." He was chosen by Abbas because of an important quality he had – an ability to avoid controversies. According to the source, Hussein fears to lose all he has gained, and "Abbas knows he will never jeopardize his position."
For three months the new grand mufti followed Abbas' expectations. People who came to listen to him preach on Fridays in Al-Aqsa Mosque never heard him inciting against Israel. His fatwas (religious decrees) also avoided such controversial statements.
Hussein explains that the authority of the grand mufti was wide-ranging.
"We discuss worship, personal issues, economic issues, social issues and political issues – everything which is related to Islam."
Hussein went on to explain that the mufti discusses all aspects of Islam, including politics.
And then he made a surprising comment.
"It is the Palestinian people's right to engage in resistance until the occupation ends. As long as the resistance is legitimate, everything related to it is also legitimate."
Asked to express his view with regard to suicide bombing, the mufti answered: "It is legitimate, of course, as long as it plays a role in the resistance."
The mufti made it clear that he wished to see peace in the region, but that to his dismay, the Israeli government and army were engaged in "clear and ongoing aggression against the Palestinian people."Abbas will now have to decide how far he is willing to let the mufti proceed before he calls him to order...
I won't hold my breath.
Apparently Islamofascism is alive and well in the Jerusalem. The legacy of Jew hating from Nazi to Mufti to Mohammedan is thriving.
Is it possible that former Representative Foley was himself a victim of a Roman Catholic Priest pedophile? Of course the Priest is denying a sexual relationship with Foley; however it would not be the first time a Priest lied about homosexual relationships with boys.
ROME - A priest acknowledged Thursday that he used to go naked in saunas with Mark Foley decades ago when the former congressman was a boy in Florida, but the clergyman denied that the two had a sexual relationship. (AP)
Does the denial seem believable? Priestly scandals and a Pedophile Congressman: I doubt there is a coincidence. There is no justification that releases Foley from responsibility; however there is an understanding for the reason that Foley is a pedophile. It is only speculation at this point yet it is more than likely Foley was trained at pedophilia at a young age. In this day and age the culprit is probably a sinning rogue Priest of Foley’s faith.
UPDATE (10/19/06 7:35 PM)
The Washington Post reports "light touching" being admitted by the Priest. The Priests denial of sexual contact is somewhat similar President Clinton's "I did not have sex with that woman."
Wednesday, October 18, 2006
Here is the YouTube video that stirred a bit of controversy a week or two ago. Evidently soon after its YouTube post, YouTube put a "content warning" on this video.
The "content warning" smacked of screening free speech in favor of the Liberal Democrats and the Clintonistas. The reason favoritism existed is because there was no nudity or profanity in the video. There was merely a Conservative view lambasting Clinton. Profanity is a mainstream occurrence of Liberal Democrats yet there is never a content warning.
Conservatives were up in arms to YouTube and YouTube did the right thing. They removed the content warning.
Now here is something to ponder. Google has bought YouTube. Will there be more slanted Left obstruction of slanted Right Free Speech with Video Blogging?
The pacifists are probably already lining up to denounce the militarization of Outer Space. In this day of psychotic rogue States and irresponsible mindless destructive Islamofascist terrorist organizations, a military presence in Space may save the day for American National Interests when push comes to shove.
The old Cold War adversaries (Russia and China) are increasingly taking the side of Mohammedans that hate America. When the terrorists and rogues acquire (notice I said "when" and not "if") nuclear WMD, our Satellite monitoring defenses will priority protection.
Yes it is obvious that we will need to protect ourselves and our way of life by military presence in Space.
There have been media rumors that China and Russia have acquired the ability to render American Satellites useless. Since China and Russia insist on arming Islamofascists it is imperative to weaponize Outer Space while have the capability to do so.
It is ironic that the so-called "Star Wars" program was one of the defense programs that the U.S.S.R. feared even with public evidence that such a system probably would not be viable. Reagan's Star Wars contributed to the demise of the Soviet Union's military solidarity. The Soviet military could not compete monetarily with increased military spending by America.
I wonder what the effect of weaponizing Outer Space will do to America's enemies.
Secretary of State Rice has been traveling in the Middle East meeting with moderate Arab leaders relating to the Palestinian problem. In the process of doing this Rice has publicly acknowledged full support of so-called moderate Mahmoud Abbas President of the Palestine Authority (PA) and Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
It boggles my mind that Abbas has been tagged as a moderate! The PLO is a terrorist organization created by Yasser Arafat. The foundation for the PLO is Fatah, the original Palestinian terrorists. An off shoot of Fatah is the al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades, which is a militant faction of Fatah that carries homicides of Jews via suicide bombers.
I am wondering if the Bush Administration and Secretary Rice have lapsed into wishful thinking concerning the existence of a Palestinian State. If or when a nation called Palestine comes to sovereign existence will not bring peace to the Middle East. It will be a nation of terrorist organizations with the sole purpose of Iran’s ultimate dream: wiping Israel off the map.
Rice is even trying to aid in forming a unity government between Hamas and Fatah. Does a Hamas/Fatah union mean peace for Israel? No rational human being that is secular or religious can ever realistically imagine such a thing. Such a unity will only be a union of resources via a truce of contrary ideas with end game being to obliterate Israel.
Tuesday, October 17, 2006
There are scandals galore occurring just before the November 2006 elections. If you only read the Mainstream Media (MSM) you would think all that is scandalous revolves around the Republican Party.
The fact of the matter is that the Democrats have just as many scandals, many much more heinous than the Republican Party. The Democrats have House members that did more than send lurid emails to pages, they actually slept with them.
It is scandalous the emphasis the MSM perpetrated in the Plamegate Scandal. There are zero indictments related directly about a government cover-up. The only indictment is based on Scooter Libby’s bad memory that Fitzgerald decided was a lie and thus perjury. If that ever gets to trial it will found NOT Guilty. Has the MSM covered the scandalous nature of the Democratic Party rail roading of Republican Staffers? UH NO!
The Plebeian has posted how the MSM has emphasized a Republican scandal in Ohio, but has reported ZERO on a Democratic Party scandal in Tennessee.
Rick Joyner addresses the Biblical issue of yielding to government authority. Well Joyner kind of addresses the issue. He puts out the Scripture Romans 13: 1-7; however Joyner does not address to what degree a Christian should submit to an evil government. He implies that Christians should submit to evil authorities because the Apostle Paul penned the Holy Spirits leanings during the wicked reign of Emperor Nero of the Roman Empire. Nero was a bona fide nut case with unlimited human power until his assassination. Nero utilized this power to blame Christians for actions Nero actually ordered himself (like the burning of Rome). Torture soon followed the blame game for persecuted Christians.
Christians literally did not resist this persecution when apprehended for their faith. They displayed what true martyrdom is: laying down their life for their faith as an example. These early Christians did not murder innocent people out of Nero’s offense as Muslims do in this age.
One thing I did catch my attention. Christ came to restore humanity back to the Image of God they were created in. The Image of God became twisted at the Fall. Governments are only as good as their ruling elites. If their ruling elites are basically good with foundations of respect for humanity (many call these human rights), than the nation tend to be good. If the ruling elites tend toward immorality and wickedness then the government will reflect the rulers.
I personally lean toward resist the evil of bad government. When government fails to protect its citizens from wickedness and/or simultaneously promote wickedness, then the citizens have the human (if not the Divine) right to cast off the wickedness.
To cast off wicked governments by its citizens there must be a moral righteous indignation by a majority of the citizens. When the citizenry submits, complies and/or agrees with evil government, then the Christian minority should be in the mode of passive resistance. This was the reality of the Roman Empire of Nero’s day.
Taking the Land, Part XLVIII
By Rick Joyner
MorningStarMinistries.org Article Index
October 16, 2006
Man exists for God. Government exists for man, and this includes the government of God. Government is the servant, not the master. Because fallen man is basically selfish and self-centered, stronger government is needed to keep order and provide justice in this fallen world. No earthly government has been perfect at this, or will be. Most governments degenerate into using people for their own interests rather than serving the interests of their people, and this includes church governments. This is when governments fall and begin to fail in their basic purpose.
As mankind is restored to the image of God like we were originally created, the framework of rules and regulations within government will be needed less and less. The highest law is love. When we have been fully restored, we will be ruled by love, and not selfish interests. However, until that work has been accomplished, the rule of government is necessary. Even so, we must always keep in mind that the government is a means to an end and not the ultimate goal itself.
In Philippians 2:12, we are told to "...work out your salvation with fear and trembling," and one of the primary ways that we do this is by learning to submit to authority. The first thing said about the serpent, the devil, is that he was "crafty" (see Genesis 3:1). To be crafty is to have a nature that is constantly trying to bend the rules and get away with something. The Lord gave all of the extraordinary promises in Deuteronomy 28 to those who would "diligently obey" (see Deuteronomy 28:1) Him and His commandments. Those who will enter into the Promised Land and enjoy all of its benefits are those who have the opposite nature of the serpent, who instead of seeking ways to bend the rules, are diligently seeking how they can better obey.
This is a basic character issue. When salvation has been fully worked into our nature, the rebellious nature will have been replaced with one of "diligence" to obey. Many consider that they will be perfect in obedience when they have a perfect government to submit to, but that is a mentality that will cause us to miss the greatest and easiest working out of our salvation, which is crucifying our fallen nature. This is why the Apostle Paul wrote in Romans 13:1-7:
Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God.
Therefore he who resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon themselves.
For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same;
for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath upon the one who practices evil.
Wherefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience' sake.
For because of this you also pay taxes, for rulers are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing.
Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.
When Paul wrote this, Nero was the emperor, the most cruel and anti-Christian of all the Roman emperors, and the one who would even order Paul's own execution. King David was required to serve King Saul, and remained faithful to Saul and his house, even when Saul had killed the priests of the Lord and was trying to kill David. David knew God had anointed Saul and placed him in authority, and David had such respect for God's authority that his heart smote him for just cutting off the edge of Saul's robe. It was this profound respect for authority that enabled David to establish a seat of authority that would last for eternity. Jesus Himself is said to be seated upon the throne of David, and one of His most honored titles was "Son of David."
As has been prophesied at the end of this age, lawlessness will increase, and will be a primary contributing factor in what will be the greatest time of trouble the world has ever known. Even so, as lawlessness is increasing in the world, God's people, who will be preparing the way for His kingdom, will be growing in obedience and respect for authority. This will be a main point of conflict at the end of this age and the struggle between the darkness of this age and the light of the age to come. Which side will we be on?
Monday, October 16, 2006
Recently Indonesia made sure the correct government Justice officials were in place to prevent further stays of execution for three Christians condemned to death. Their crime: protecting themselves from murdering Mohammedans. In the process of self-defense some Mohammedans died. Of course Christians cannot kill a Mohammedan in self-defense in a Mohammedan dominated land in which non-believing Mohammedans are considered dhimmis.
I am posting The Jawa Reports plea to boycott Indonesia:
Boycott Indonesia--Stop Murdering Christians Now!
October 16, 2006
The Jawa Report
Civil war is in the air in Indonesia. Christians are daily being slaughtered and the government does little to protect them.
Two of our longtime blog-friends, Stan the Infidel and Big White Infidel, are furious over the treatment of Christians in Indonesia. What the media paints as 'sectarian violence' is really Muslim persecution of Christian minorities.
Stan and Big White are headed to Rev. Irianto Kongkoli's funeral in Palu. Rev. Kongkoli was a Christian minister gunned down in public early this morning. This comes on the heels of a bombing on Saturday and after three Christians were executed for their alleged participation in sectarian violence. Violence that has largely targetted Christians and over which no Muslim has been prosecuted.
If their reaction is any gauge of Christian sentiment in Indonesia, then expect an escalation of the violence. Especially pay attention to Stan's extended comments here.
I would urge the Christians of Indonesia, and especially our friends Stan and Big White, towards self-restraint and non-violence. Not that I am a pacifist, I am not, but I am a realist. One should only fight battles if they can win. This is not a battle that can be won through violence.
There is something that you can do to show your solidarity with Indonesia's persecuted Christians. Boycott Indonesia.
Write your Congressman.
Write the Indonesian embassy or call (202) 775 - 5200
Write the consular section of the U.S. embassy, Jakarta.
Next time you're in WalMart, be sure to check that label. Don't buy Indonesian.
I fear that if the international community does not immediately and successfully pressure the Indonesian government to protect its Christian minorities with more than lip service, that serious violence and civil war will erupt. A war with only one possible outcome: increased persecution and the mass killings of Christians.
Indonesia is very sensitive to public criticisms. The government spends a lot of time engaged in propaganda intended to show that country as a shining example of what moderate Islam looks like.
So, public pressure may just work in this instance.
Please do what you can to help.