Wilders’ Popularity Worrying Dutch Leftists

In you have forgotten or haven’t heard; Geert Wilders was order to be prosecuted by the Netherlands judiciary for hate crimes. What is Wilders crime that is driving Muslims and Leftists crazy like a hornets nest? Wilders has taken a politically incorrect stand of pronouncing Mohammedanism (i.e. Islam) as one of the modern wicked ideologies to threaten the existence of the West’s centuries of development of democratic-republic institutions, Freedom and Liberty.

Of course in the West the various sides of the political poles view the interpretation of Freedom and Liberty differently; nonetheless they do stand by them.

Now here is the interesting thing that has developed since the late January 2009 order to prosecute Wilders. Wilders’ Freedom Party (or Party for Freedom-Dutch acronym: PVV) nearly became the largest political party in the Netherlands on June 5, 2009. That Dutch election was to distribute parliamentarians to the EU. The PVV came in second to the current Dutch Prime Minister’s Christian-Democrats (CDA) Party.

This was an extremely good showing for the PVV. So good in fact that Wilders has called for early national elections for the Netherlands. Dutch political polls show that Wilders is neck and neck with Prime Minister Jan-Peter Balkenende.

Thomas Lifson writing for the American Thinker believes that if Dutch elections were held sooner rather than later that Wilders’ PVV would be the majority Party; hence Wilders would be asked to form a coalition government meaning he would be Prime Minister.

Think of that! The man deemed by European Leftists and hostile Mohammedans as a racist has rocked to such popularity, he may actually become the Netherlands’ next Prime Minister.

Since the Dutch judiciary has joined the Leftists in trying to diminish Wilders’ character, he has become one of the most popular politicians in the Netherlands. I am personally unaware of the Dutch status to prosecute Wilders stands at the moment; however I have found American Conservative and anti-Islamist websites have initiated a boycott Netherlands campaign. Here is one YouTube version.



If you believe there is a potential for Islam to transform American and European political institutions to intolerance while also limiting Freedom and Liberty you should get behind Geert Wilders.

Here is an excerpt from a CBN report published March 4, 2009:

But during Wilders' stay in America this week, which included a meeting with lawmakers at the U.S. Capitol, his screenings of Fitna have provoked only two things: discussion and debate.

"Will we leave our children, will we leave Europe's children, the values of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem?" Wilders asked an overflow crowd at the National Press Club in Washington Friday. "Or the values of Mecca, Gaza and Tehran?"

CBN News sat down with the Dutch parliamentarian before his appearance at the Press Club--where he called for an international First Amendment that would repeal all hate speech laws. Wilders says such laws stifle criticism of Islam.

"If you are an Imam or a radical Muslim you can say 'kill the Jews,' or 'wipe Israel off the face of the earth,'" Wilders said. "You can say the most terrible things, and if you say it, you will be protected by law. But if somebody stands up and says 'hey, that is wrong, we have to fight all the crazy remarks of these Islamists,' you will be brought to court."

Wilders says that's exactly what happened in his native Netherlands, where a Dutch court recently charged him with hate speech against Islam.

"I'm a fighter and I don't believe I'll end up behind bars. But it's not about me," he told CBN News. "The question is: will free speech be put behind bars?"

JRH 7/12/09

Islamic Toleration? NOT

Here is the religion of peace in action.

Dr. Wael Perpetuates Muslim Propaganda

John R. Houk
© February 13, 2009

Here is a comment from Dr. Wael a citizen of Egypt. I believe the comment is in reference to this post, “The CRC is another Step toward U.N. World Government.” Yet Dr. Wael could be complaining about many posts on SlantRight.com. I am not exactly Islamic friendly.

JRH 2/13/09
**********************************
COMMENT

Dr. Wael
Sent to SlantRight: Thu 2/12/2009 9:47 PM
Dr. Wael’s website: Arab Honor

Sir
you must be very close to the region or live in it

There is an Arab proverb says "our street is narrow and we know each other"
I hope you are talking to maybe.......? Europeans or to Americans but not to an Arab who live here in Egypt very close to Israel So let's be realistic and speak in a manner that we can keep a debate going OK?

And [sic] here are the things:

Bush would not appolgiz [sic] for the question of WMD in his last days in office and Colin powel [sic] won't resign.

When Al Qaeida leader confest [sic] of 911? and I assure you that such a tribman [sic] like Ben Laden would never even think about attacking America or Israel. we [sic] have in our country a lot of them.

2/3rd of Americans want Bush in court for his behaviour in (war against terror) and damage caused to the country Ok we we recognize [sic] Israel as country and it's people right to live in security but that doesnt [sic] mean to launch a propaganda against Arabs who are Muslims and Christians or against Muslims alone, Because even I am a christian but my culture is islamic and i am proud.

______________________________

I am guessing Dr. Wael is implying that Christians, Jews and Muslims all live in harmony in the Arab Middle East under the wisdom of Islamic Culture.

Not that sounds a little hard to believe and it sounds like the kind of propaganda that Muslims would like the West and/or Christians in America to buy.

It is ridiculous!

First let’s put the harmony of religions submitting to a peace of an Islamic Culture.

• Arab nations lied how they treated Jews prior to the establishment of the nation Israel in 1948 by saying the Jews living in harmony would be attacked and expelled if Israel was allowed to become a nation. The fact is all across the Muslim Middle East and Muslim North Africa (yep including Egypt and Syria) Jews were already being persecuted. After Israel became a nation in 1948 and whupped multiple invading Islamic nations then a comparable amount of Jews were expelled to the amount of Arabs that fled from Israel hoping invading Muslims would push Jews into the sea.

• Dr. Wael identifies himself as a Christian Egyptian proud of Arab (which really means Islamic) culture. Let’s see: If Dr. Wael is an Egyptian and a Christian he would be Coptic. The Coptic Christians are actually what remains of the original Egyptian language derived from as far back as the days of the Pharaohs. The Coptic Christians of Egypt have had a better relationship with Muslims than other conquered Christians in the Middle East; however that has been an on again off again experience depending on which Muslim leader rules. Since the end of WWII Egyptian Muslims have been highly influenced by the Wahhabi form of Islam which dominates the Muslim Brotherhood (Ikhwan). The Copts have been highly persecuted to the point of migration. Guess where the Coptic Christians migrate too? One hint: It is not to Saudi Arabia. O yes that would be the nation that has a tradition of the freedom of religion – the USA.

• That is just Egypt. Christians residing in nations dominated by Islam have constantly received the foot of humiliation and persecution. (See also HERE)

• Islam is not only harsh toward kafir, the Theo-Political religion is also harsh on its own adherents when the perception of violating social norms proscribed by Sharia. Islam is also harsh to its adherents for viewing one practice of Islam better than the other such as Sunni vs. Shia.

• Read Brigitte Gabriel’s book “Because they Hate”: This is an excellent example of a Christian Middle Easterner (Lebanon), whose faith was the dominant religion of Lebanon being persecuted into the minority.

There is no harmony among people in Islamic culture Dr. Wael.

Dr. Wael displays his ignorance of America when he says “2/3 of America want bush in court ...” He obviously equates low poll ratings with the deluded ramblings of some fringe American Leftists who called for President Bush to be prosecuted.

If Dr. Wael is indeed a Christian while simultaneously proud of his Islamic culture (“my culture”), then Dr. Wael is obviously a real good dhimmi.

This is the long response. Dr. Wael visited the SlantRight sister blog at Slant Right blogger and made these comments:

Dr Wael said...

Why ? Why this hate and this revolt against Islam and Muslim?
Muslim do wars , Do terror ,Do 911
Dear
911 was just a lie just like Bush's weapon of mass distruction in Iraq
See my blog.
I am not a muslim but I live with them in Syria and Egypt
maybe muslim in the west differnt?

Here is my short version response there:

Theway2k said...

Dr. Wael Hmm ...

You are either the victim or a perpetuator of the delusions that come from rogue Syria or elements of Ihkwan [sic] in Egypt.

1. 911 was an al-Qaeda plan in which the actual planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed confessed.

2. There are sources of information that differ from the Duelfer Report which probably has refused to acknowledge because of Political Correctness or the fear of causing a diplomatic incident.

*Russia in an Intelligence coup moved WMD out of Iraq.

*Former Iraqi Air Force General Georges Sada on Iraqi WMD.

*David Gaubatz ignored by Iraq Survey Group that was responsible for investigating the existence of Iraq WMD (Hmm ... Charles Duelfer was one of the lead ISG people ignoring Gaubatz).

JRH 2/13/09

Early Christian Existence Returning

Academics and Western intelligencia are labeling the days we live in as a post-Christian era. The meaning conveyed is that the haven of Christendom no longer views itself as Christian. The implication is that the West is a secular society abandoning all aspects of the Christian faith. Indeed many in the West – particularly in Europe – view Christian morality and values as archaic and mythological to a viewed reality evolving humanistic thought which is egalitarian and tolerant of all lifestyles post-Christian society deems acceptable.

Because of this Christianity is back on the footing of the early Church prior to Roman Emperor Constantine (circa 300’s A.D.). Indeed Academia has abandoned the Christian calendar of measuring time. A.D. (Anno Domini) has been renamed C.E. (Christian Era) and B.C. (Before Christ) is now B.C.E. (Before Christian Era). Anno Domini is Latin for the English “year of our Lord.” Thus you can understand why a Secular Humanist Christian rejecting Academia rejects the traditional measurement of time utilizing “A.D.”

In Europe this anti-Christian attitude is becoming ingrained into the minds of Europeans. The days of Christian persecution (thus far non-violent) have become a matter of practice in criminal and civil law in Europe. It is the nomenclature of society that if Christian faith offends it must be squelched even if it deprives a Christian Believer of Freedom of Speech. Thus Christian cannot preach Christian morality pertaining to homosexuality. Thus Christians cannot warn of the evils of the violent religion of Islam. Indeed European society has become so anti-Christian that it looks the other way when members of the Islamic religion preach violence against Jews, Christians and Western Society in general.

The irony of tolerating Islamic vitriol is that a significant amount of Muslims in Europe wish to have a double standard rule of law. This means one rule of law for indigenous and inherent Europeans and Sharia Law for Muslims.

HELLO! Sharia Law is the absolute opposite of even Secular Humanistic morality. Sharia Law calls for the snuffing out of homosexuals and retrograding civil rights of women.

For me that is incredulous! Christians are being prosecuted in Europe for standing for their Christian faith because it is particularly offensive to Muslims who view that Mohammed is the final authority of what faith should be. The very Secular Humanists that fear Christian Morality as a myth are validating Islam that is still living in a medieval mindset of violence as enforcement of belief. And Allah forbid a Christian or a Jew denigrates Islam in favor of an alternate faith. Honor for Allah must be maintained.

European government officials look the other way for this mindless Islamic attitude and prosecute people religious or non-religious that wish to maintain the culture of their heritage.

A classic example of this is the Dutch persecution of Geert Wilders for producing his movie “Fitna.” Fitna is a movie short documentary utilizing imagery of present day Islamic influenced atrocities and matching them with Mohammedan scriptures of the Quran. Evidently exposing the truth is incitement and hate-speech according to the Dutch government and Muslims in general. Not to mention the so-called Religion of Peace has threatened Geert Wilders’ life for this truthful portrayal of Islam.

The Christian Anti-Defamation Commission (CADC) provides other recent examples of persecution of Christians in Europe. The CADC warns that anti-Christian mentality is taking root in America. Christians in America can choose to sit on their laurels and await vilification or do something the American Left and Muslim-American organizations would fear; i.e. become active politically and socially in standing up for your Christian faith before it becomes illegal to do so.
JRH 2/5/09
_____________________
SlantRight Editor: In case the SlantRight.com archive is ever removed here is the complete post as viewed there:

Coming to America!

Christian Anti-Defamation Commission
Tuesday, 03 February 2009 20:59

Coming to America! Silence of Christ’s Lambs
 
When trying to predict where America is going, often all you have to do is look across the pond at “post-Christian” Western Europe. America is typically a decade or two behind them on social issues, that is, unless we act now.

Stories are coming in from Europe of Christians being fired from their workplace or who are intimidated to be silent. If one dares to extend Christian concern or act in a way faithful to their religious convictions they will pay with their job.

Praying Nurse Disciplined
A nurse in Britain, Caroline Petrie, was suspended after she simply asked a patient if they would like prayer. The patient refused and later reported Petrie. The patient said that she was not offended by the offer, but she reported Nurse Petrie because she was afraid someone else might be offended. So Petrie has been ordered to attend disciplinary meetings because someone might be offended.

Previously Petrie was forced to stop giving out Christian prayer cards to patients who asked for them because the relative of a patient objected. As a result, Petrie had to take an equality and diversity course.

Petrie said, "My concern is for the person as a whole, not just their health. I was told not to force my faith on anyone but I could respond if patients themselves brought up the subject [of religion]."

Counselor Conflicted
Another Brit, Gary McFarlane, a counselor for Relate Avon Corporation, was dismissed from his job because he expressed concern over the possibility of having to give sexual advice to homosexual couples. MacFarlane never refused to counsel a same-sex couple. He only expressed concern at the possibility because of a conflict between his Christian faith and homosexuality.

McFarlane believed that it was due to his Christian faith that he was fired from Relate Avon. "If I were a Muslim, this would not have happened. But Christians seem to have fewer and fewer rights," McFarlane said.

A British employment tribunal has ruled in favor of a McFarlane, but said that “The claimant was not treated as he was because of his Christian faith, but because (the company) believed that he would not comply with its policies.”

Minister Muzzled
A minister and radio talk show host is taking legal action after he allegedly was fired for offending Muslims by defending Christianity on air.

Rev. Mahboob Masih, a minister in the Church of England, claims he was unfairly dismissed from his position of host of a radio program in Glasgow. The action taken against him, Rev. Masih claims, was a case of religious discrimination.

After a lively religious debate about a prominent Muslim, who, according to Rev. Masih, belittled Christ, the radio station management accused Rev. Masih of not being balanced enough on air.

Rev. Masih reluctantly made an on-air apology in an attempt to defuse the situation, but refused to comply with a request from a senior station official to deliver an apology in person at the Central Mosque in Glasgow. Now he is appealing to the decision to fire him to the labor board.

No Place for Faith at BBC
Another radio talk show host in England, Jeremy Vine, is a Christian and believes that Christ is who he says he is, but doesn’t think he could say it on his BBC show.


The Radio 2 host says society is becoming increasingly intolerant of Christian views. It has become “almost socially unacceptable to say you believe in God.”

Mr. Vine is a practicing Anglican, but does not discuss his faith on air. “One of the things that I think, which may sound bizarre, is that Christ is who he said he was,” he said. “I don’t think I’d put that out on my show; I suppose there’s a bit of a firewall between thinking that and doing the job I do.”

The BBC did a self audit in 2007 and determined that there is an institutional anti-Christian bias.

This is only a snap shot of what will come in America if we continue to allow our first amendment liberties to be undermined by hate crime legislation and stand idly by while Christian discrimination goes unopposed.

TAKE ACTION:
Sign our petition to stop American hate crimes legislation. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee introduced a new hate crime legislation, The David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, H.R. 256, which is direct opposition to our Constitution. She also submitted a new companion bill, The David Ray Ritcheson Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, H.R. 262. These two bills directly threaten your freedom of speech and religion.

Click here to sign our petition now!
________________________________
Early Christian Existence Returning
John R. Houk
© February 5, 2009
______________________________

Coming to America!
© 2008 [sic] • Christian Anti-Defamation Commission

Homosexuals Persecuting Christians and Mormons

California’s Proposition 8 defined marriage as between a male and a female; ergo Adam and Steve or Eve and Anna cannot engage in holy matrimony. Of course I doubt that Proposition 8 was worded that yet it is true nonetheless.

I am a strong believer in Biblical Morality as opposed to Secular Humanist morality. The former utilizes the Judeo-Christian authority of the Bible as the foundation for morality and the latter uses – well uses moral relativity as a foundation for morality.

Biblical Morality defines right and wrong based on the revealed character of God. Moral relativity defines right and wrong based on human perceptions of acceptability, thus altruistically a large group of humans that have evolved a belief system is right and should be tolerated on an egalitarian level by all humans.

Significant amount of Afro-American Christians, Evangelical Christians, Roman Catholics and followers of Mormonism turned out to tip morality in California closer to the Biblical version rather than the relativist version.

The moral relativist homosexuals erupted in violence in one of the most liberal States in the Union. The reprobate homosexuals flowed into the streets bashing Christians physically.

Most of the homosexual venom was reserved for the adherents of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (Mormons). The Mormons did a very efficient ad campaign promoting Proposition 8 ergo the homosexuals reserved special acts of violence and terrorism against Mormon adherents and Mormon property.

Just as a sidebar I am not exactly a fan of Mormonism. Mormons call themselves Christians when in fact they are way off the way of Christ; nonetheless even Mormons recognize the Creator created a male and a female for matrimony. Even though Mormonism is not Christian there is no doubt that old Joseph Smith created his cult from the image of Christianity thus there is an existence of a Judeo-Christian moral foundation in Mormonism.

Just as the voters have spoken when Barack Hussein Obama was elected, so also have Californian voters (and over 20 other States) spoken on the definition of Marriage. Homosexuals thrive on calling those that understand Biblically that homosexuality is a deviant lifestyle as bigots.

Many have written of a clash of civilizations between the West and Islam. The current battle within the borders of America is a clash between Biblical ethics and morality versus the ethics and morality of the relativity of Secular Humanism.

It is time for these groups (and the voters in the middle or indifferent) to take a political stand. Allow the democratic process to settle these issues State by State. Also the Federal and State Judiciary needs to examine if the democratic process is Democratic and NOT legislate and create law from an activist bench.

JudgeRight has an excellent post concerning persecution on traditional Western Values by the deviant alternate lifestyle known as homosexuality.

You will see three YouTube videos that flow along with his post. Be sure to the view them for oft times seeing and hearing is to view the truth.

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QD1AITHS2Wc

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLZIdwurGgY

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7MPUfGnH5o

JRH 11/18/08

Hindus Commit Genocide on India’s Christians

If you have read any of my blogs you are aware that I harp on the violence that I believe is inherent in Mohammedan holy writings.

Now I preface this post with those thoughts on Mohammedanism because I just read about an extremely disturbing incident in the nation of India. You might think this incident would involve Mohammedans and Hindus which are natural enemies mostly because the brutalizing conquering aspect of Islam reaped extreme violence on Hindu Indians in India’s medieval days.

This disturbing incident has zero to do with Mohammedans.

This disturbing incident has to do with Hindus operating a pogrom in the Orissa region of India. That pogrom on August 29, 2008 resulted in the approximated deaths of 50,000 Christians. Many of these Christians tortured and raped and brutalized. Christian converts from Hinduism were often given a choice to renounce their Christian faith or die a brutal tortuous death.

I read of young Nuns being burnt alive and stripped naked and gang raped.

As I was reading this from an American Christian news outlet my thoughts immediately went to the Mainstream Media (MSM).

Why was this reprehensible genocide NOT part of a global exposé on the treatment of Christians in a genocidal moment in India? I am aware America is going through a very polarizing Presidential election and hurricanes are swooping through the nations affecting the lives of Americans. BUT my God: 50,000 individuals who were professing Christians were slaughtered by Hindus!

The thing that irks me the most about this is that I always thought of Hinduism (as opposed to Mohammedanism) to be a religion of non-violence. I mean these are the guys that let sacred white cows walk around unharmed in the midst of poverty and starvation.

I found this on a Hindu website (I cannot account for how respectable the site is. I was in a hurry).

Hinduism does not advise peace in the face of evil and injustice. The Bhagavadgita, which is like a Bible to Hindus, is a message to Arjuna when he hesitates to wage war against his own kith and kin. Sri Krishna advises him that Arjuna should wage war because it was part of his duty or karma and he should not think of withdrawing from his responsibility out of fear or cowardice.

Hindus believe that Sri Vasudeva Krishna is an incarnation of God. He himself actively participated in many wars against evil forces and served as charioteer for Arjuna. The Aryan gods of Vedic times were all warriors. Hindus also believe that if a person dies while waging a war in defense of his country, he would attain the heaven of the warriors (viraswargam) …

It was actually the Buddha who introduced the concept of peace and non-violence in a big way in the subcontinent and influenced all streams of thought. …

…

Hinduism believes that God Himself reincarnates on earth whenever there is an ascendance of evil on the earth to protect the weak, destroy the evil and restore order. Hence according to Hinduism war is justified when it is meant to protect oneself and the world from evil and injustice. However Hinduism neither supports acts of aggression nor advocates violence to terrorize people into submission. (Hinduism and War)

From this I have determined that Hinduism is not as von-violent as I thought; however to be fair and balanced Christians have also developed a “Just War” concept.

… Hinduism does not support violence, especially when it is perpetuated for selfish or egoistic reasons.

However at the same time, the Bhagavad gita [sic] does not condone helplessness and weakness in the face of injustice and wickedness. According to the scripture it is the duty of every individual to protect himself from the wicked acts of evil forces. (Hinduism and Violence)

This Hindu inflicted genocide perpetrated on Indian Christians appears to be the results of right wing Hindus who probably justify the butchery on Christians because they are consider an “evil force.” I also understand that a cycle of violence has been occurring when Christians in an effort to protect themselves may have stepped outside the box of Christian Scriptures to employ retribution in a terrorist manner.

On the other hand it is also evident that the Christian hating Hindus have blamed Christians for acts of terrorism that were brought Maoist (i.e. Chinese-like Communism) terrorists against Hindus. Somewhat like the Roman Emperor Nero blamed Christians unjustly for the burning of Rome. The everyday Hindu believes their leaders.

But to bring such death and destruction on a group of people out of retribution for real or imagined acts is unconscionable. The Global democracies should set aside their secularism at least for an outcry for the so-called compassion of secular humanist egalitarianism to denounce this genocide and call for India to bring the criminals to justice.

JRH 8/4/08

Gideons facing charges for being on public land

Secular Humanist bureaucrats are ratcheting up their attack on Christianity. Two men from Gideon’s International (the guys that put Bibles in motel rooms) were arrested for distributing Bibles to children on a public side walk adjacent to school property. They were NOT on school property.

Clearly government and Secular Humanist Christophobia are expanding its persecution of Christianity hindering Constitutional right to free speech.

The New Christian Persecution

Western Europe is probably overcome by a new religion. I am not speaking of Mohammedanism though Mohammedanism is probably the new European religion’s greatest competitor by virtue of rising population demographics and the stupidity of the new religion.

What is that new religion? It is Secular Humanism.

Secular Humanism actively attacks the foundations of Biblical morality. In Britain the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights has recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private or Christian Schools to teach Biblical Morality, viz. that homosexuality is a sin. The effect is to make Christian teachings illegal.

This kind of thinking is moving to America. The new Christian persecution is analyzed by Chuck Colson which I have posted below - READ IT.
JRH
**************************************************

Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief: Outlawing Conscience.

By Chuck Colson

Christian Post Guest Columnist

Tue, Mar. 20 2007 11:36 AM ET

You may think the day would never come when preaching the Gospel would be illegal in a Western country—when governments would restrict what Christians can teach.

You would be wrong. The persecution against the Church has taken a decisive turn in the cradle of civil liberty—the United Kingdom (UK). And it will happen in America, also, if we do not wake up to the danger.

In London last month, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights recommended regulations that would make it illegal for private, religious schools to teach that homosexual conduct is immoral. The committee claimed the regulations are needed to combat discrimination against homosexuals.

And we know about this. Last summer, the British government closed down our IFI unit because we teach that sex should be limited to heterosexual marriage. And if these regulations violate the rights of Christians—what does the government say? “Too bad.”

Luke Gormally, a fellow at London’s Linacre Centre, a Christian bioethics institute, put it this way: “The Committee could not be clearer in saying that they believe the freedom to live a practicing homosexual lifestyle trumps the freedom to live a religious lifestyle.”

The committee explicitly said that no exemption should be made for Christian schools. So, unbelievable though it sounds, Gormally notes, when it comes to sexual morality, the committee would make it illegal for Christian schools “to teach that Christianity and its principles are ‘objectively true.’”

Christian schools will not be alone in seeing their religious freedom stripped away. If this law passes, it will be difficult, if not impossible, for ministers to share the Bible’s teachings on sexual morality. Property owners who do not want, for moral reasons, to rent property to homosexuals will be breaking the law. So will Christian printers who refuse to print pro-gay literature.

Last Thursday, a House of Commons committee met to decide on the Sexual Orientation Regulations. Many MPs protested the Blair government’s refusal to allow a full debate in the House of Commons. And despite repeated appeals for a postponement, the chairperson insisted on taking an immediate vote: The regulations were upheld.

Now, the Blair government is attempting to rush the law through both houses of Parliament before opponents have time to organize. The vote will take place on Wednesday.

On that day, many Christians will be found at a prayer vigil in Old Palace Yard near the entrance to the House of Lords. We need to be praying with them, because it is going to take a miracle to keep this law from passing.
We must also realize that we are going to face this same kind of persecution if same-sex “marriage” is legalized in America. It’s already begun, especially in Massachusetts, where same-sex “marriage” was imposed by judges. For instance, a federal judge recently decreed that Christian parents cannot opt their kindergarteners out of public school classes that normalize homosexuality. And last year Catholic Charities shut down its adoption agencies rather than agree to send innocent children into homosexual homes.

This is why we desperately need to be vigilant—especially our religious liberty groups. This is why, for example, we need to pass a federal marriage amendment. If we do nothing, we are going to be facing the same future that Christians in the UK are facing: a future in which preaching the truths of the Gospel is against the law.

The New Christian Persecution

John R. Houk

© March 23, 2007

_______________________

Homosexual Practice Trumps Religious Belief: Outlawing Conscience

From BreakPoint®, March 20, 2007, Copyright 2007, Prison Fellowship Ministries. All rights reserved.

Copyright © The Christian Post

Pigs Get the Ax In China TV Ads, In Nod to Muslims

Mohammedan victimhood has even reached the official atheistic State of the People’s Republic of China. You see the Chinese New Year is labeled the year of the “pig.” Nestle had prepared a marketing campaign that included Chinese New Year symbolism, which means pigs.

China vetoed the Nestle marketing campaign because it might (gag) offend Mohammedans.

Now this is remarkable for China does not seem to mind offending Christians: the fastest growing religion in Communist China. The Chinese routinely bull doze churches and homes that are said to be illegal. Unregistered Christian Pastors and Christian Church members are routinely tortured to extricate information.

Yet the Chinese are more concerned of their violent minority of Mohammedans, than peaceful Christians that offer no overt violence to the Communist Chinese. Why is that?

I suspect it has more to do with Chinese alliances than sympathy for Mohammedans and antipathy for Christians. Who is that ally? It is Iran, a huge provider of oil to the Chinese economy. Hmm…

(** Since the WSJ story is available only by subscription, I have posted the Blind Conservative post HERE.)

Mohammedans in Indonesians Brutalize Christians

You need to understand that Mohammedans hate – yes I said hate – Christians and Jews. The Mohammedan book they call “holy” calls Christians and Jews “people of the book.” Mohammedans use this as an example that their cult is a “religion of peace.” That is all deception for their book promotes the death of all that insult Mohammedanism. The protection is only if the Christian and Jew bow in subservience and acknowledgement that Mohammedanism is superior. Without compliance, death is the required consequence as far as the Mohammedan is concerned.

Atlas Shrugs has some photographs smuggled out of Indonesia. Indonesia is the most populated Mohammedan nation on the planet. Recently Mohammedans went on a killing spree against Christians. The killing spree included public humiliation, mutilation and desecration of the murdered Christians and beheading with heads lined up as trophies.

Atlas Shrugs is bold enough to show the pictures. I am not that bold. It is a kind of thing that a free Blog as this would put a warning on.

If you have the stomach for it, view how Mohammedans truly feel about Christians who choose to worship freely without compliance Mohammedan restrictions.

Indonesian Christian Persecution Update

Christians are executed for murder in Indonesia. Their crime: self-defense against Mohammedan murderers.

Mohammedan terrorists involved in the Bali bombing are released for Mohammedan evaluated good behavior. Did you read that - RELEASED!

Now on the same island of Sulawesi, Christian Churches are being burnt to the ground. Since terrorists are released for crimes against humanity and Christians are executed for defending themselves; how can the Christian community in Sulawesi respond? They KNOW the authorities will do nothing. If the Christians seek justice on their own, it could be an excuse for the Mohammedan government to execute a Christian genocide.

And why not? The Western powers have done nothing in Sudan relating to Darfar genocide or Christian genocide in South Sudan.

Certainly the Indonesian government knows they can get away with it. I mean the Indonesians already have participated in genocide in East Timor. The East Timorians wanted Independence from Indonesia. The Indonesian solution: Kill as many as possible.

May the same solution be waiting for Christians in Indonesian Sulawesi?