Friday, August 31, 2007

Inhofe C-130 Plane Experienced Terrorist Rocket Fire in Iraq

If you wish to see how unpatriotic Leftist Democrats truly are, read the E-newsletter response by Senator Inhofe of a near death experience in Iraq:

JRH 8/31/07
Team Inhofe (E-Newsletter)
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:11:03 -0400 (EDT)

Supporters of Senator Inhofe,

You may have already heard the news. Seven minutes into their departure from Iraq, the C-130 airplane Senator Inhofe was flying on was shot at by three rocket propelled grenades. Evasive action was taken by the skilled flight crew and flares were deployed in the event the rockets were heat-seeking.

I know your reaction to hearing Senator Inhofe is safely back in the United States is like ours: relief.

But an elected leader within the Oklahoma Democrat Party had a different reaction this morning: disappointment.

In fact, two liberal Democrat websites posted the news with headlines such as:

"So close yet so far...Inhofe plane fired on in Iraq"
"We can't get rid of this crazy bastard"

Can you believe that? It doesn't matter what party you belong to or even if you're a U.S. Senator: any time an American citizen safely returns from Iraq is cause for celebration.

We often talk about how liberals will do anything to defeat our Senator next year, but this proves when they say they will do "anything," they really mean it.

More than a year away from Election Day, the race hasn't even begun to heat up yet. But with hateful rhetoric already this intense, we must be fully prepared for the liberal Democrats to be unrelenting in their vile remarks.

Most importantly, we must never lower to their level. We must remain focused on the issues.
Senator Inhofe has a tremendous record of service, and we can be proud of what he has accomplished for Oklahoma in Washington.


Team Inhofe

Paid for by Friends of Jim Inhofe

Olmert Led Israeli Government Giving Up Jewish Heritage in Deluded Expectation of Peace

Israel and the Palestinian Authority have been negotiating behind closed doors. As usual the PA says we can work our problems out with Israel if there are concessions made. I mean “as usual” because the PA is demanding concessions that rupture the socio-religious faith of Judaism concerning locations that are of preeminent holiness to observant Jews.

The perspective will destroy the ethos of Jewish existence. Imagine praying for centuries for a return to Jerusalem and the location of Jewish Temple, then possessing the answer to prayer, then have the Israeli government give it up for the delusional promise of peace for the exchange of the holiest landmarks of Judaism. Why? Because Mohammedans believe it is the THIRD holiest site in their religion and the arrogant belief that once Dar al-Islam always Dar al-Islam.

One: this is merely a Mohammedan foot in the door to exact future Jewish genocide.

Two: The bitterness on the part of observant Jews will ultimately lead to the creation of Jewish terrorist groups to do to the Mohammedans what the Mohammedan terrorists have done for a half a century, i.e. execute violence to terrorize for the goal of the return of holy sites. Someone will realize if it worked for Mohammedans it will work for disgruntled observant Jews.

Here are a
couple of source articles that brings the issue into perspective.

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Is an American Attack on Iran Looming?

Here is a story that really has no support from the Mainstream Media (MSM), however the existence of the story is something that is in tune with a feeling I have had for some time: An American attack on Iran.

I have noticed
even European nations are beginning to consider extra-diplomatic options on nuclear arming Iran.

Note the story about Iran emphasizes there is not a consideration of invasion but of a massive naval and air assault on Iran. This is something I have advocated in the past as the safest way to engage Iran then look at the Iranian reaction. Iran has promised a brutal reaction to any attack; however can Iran come through with such a threat after its economy and oil production is threatened?

I do think that Iran is nuts enough to launch some kind of reprisal but I don’t think a frontal military response is the Iranian cards. Like the rogue nation that Iran is, the only serious reprisal to an American assault would in the form of terrorism. If that happens, then America will have the option for another assault to teach another military power lesson.

There is also the possibility that geopolitical experts have deemed to much credit to the verbal warnings of the Iranian Mullocracy. Iran may publicly back down then clandestinely attempt to disrupt the globe through subterfuge with a less of a trail to Iranian culpability (even though everyone will know who is culpable).

At any rate the closer the 2008 elections emerge in America I believe the less likelihood of an American attack unless there is a political miracle and the Republicans and Democrats secretly cooperate to attack no matter who wins the Presidency in 2008.

U.S. Dept. of Justice Sponsors Islamist Convention

The Holy Land Foundation (HLF): This is a Mohammedan charitable organization whose name will be infamous. HLF is neither a Christian nor a Jewish organization. HLF is indicted specifically for taking donations from Mohammedans in America and funneling the money the wretched Mohammedan Palestinian-Arab terrorist organization Hamas. With a name like “Holy Land” I would not be surprised if Christians and Jews unwittingly gave money to this fund raiser of homicide and destruction to working men, innocent women and innocent children.

Here is the thing: Erick Stakelbeck of (via his blog) implicates the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) as unindicted co-conspirators with indicted HLF. Both Mohammedan organizations have simultaneously run an American propaganda campaign that they represent moderate Mohammedan-Americans and clandestinely operated an Islamist agenda. The former has opened the doors to government funding and as expert advisers on Mohammedan terrorism at home and abroad federal authorities such as the FBI.

This is what Stakelbeck on Terror says:

The Many Enemies of George Bush

Victor Davis Hanson lists some of the reasons why people hate President Bush in some cases in a consuming rage. Hanson even hints some of the reasons are good enough for unpopularity. The long end of the deal though, Hanson writes of some good reasons to admire President Bush even in the midst of personal screw-ups and faux pas.

Almontaser and KGIA

Samuel G. Freedman writing for the NY Times defends Yemeni immigrant Debbie Almontaser who was to be the Principal of an opening Arabic culture Public School opening in Brooklyn, NY. Almontaser resigned her position as Principal before the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA) even opened its doors.

Freedman goes through a list of
anti-KGIA sources as if they were on a witch hunt to have Almontaser burnt at the stake. After comparing some of the anti-KGIA sources with Freedman’s article at the NY Times, I grudgingly agree that Almontaser was treated harsher than perhaps her actual character represents.

In addition to Daniel Pipes, Freedman lists these as anti-KGIA and anti-Almontaser blogs or media that provided editorials:

  • The New York Post
  • The New York Sun
  • PipeLineNews
  • Militant Islam Monitor

  • (I am a big fan of the last two as sources.)

    On the other hand Almontaser is not a person that I would still favor as a Public School funded Principal of a school purported to have merely an Arabic culture curriculum. Here is the accreditation Freedman provides for Almontaser:

    For anyone who bothered to look for it, Ms. Almontaser left a clear, public record of interfaith activism and outreach across the boundaries of race, ethnicity and religion. Her efforts, especially after the Sept. 11 attacks, earned her honors, grants and fellowships. She has collaborated so often with Jewish organizations that an Arab-American newspaper, Aramica, castigated her earlier this summer for being too close to a “Zionist organization,” meaning the Anti-Defamation League.

    Ms. Almontaser has twice been profiled on
    Voice of America as an accomplished Muslim American. Her son, Yousif, spent several months on rescue efforts at ground zero as a member of the Army National Guard. Four of her nephews and cousins have served in the United States military in Iraq.

    None of these details were exactly hidden under a rock. But her critics …

    Freedman’s brief summation portrays a picture of the Arab-American Patriot. And you know what; it is difficult to argue with her accomplishments as portrayed by Freedman.

    The thing is Almontaser’s critics went over the edge in demonizing her whereas Freedman may be a tad bit over the edge of glowing praise. Certainly from reading the comparisons Almontaser is a good American citizen due her rights of Freedom of Speech, Thought and Religion. The difficulty I have with Almontaser deals with the political polarity that has infected America opening a chasm of what is right and wrong in which an American should stand for their country.

    For example
    Freedman fails to mention that some of those awards and civic relationships have been extended from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR has been linked to the Palestinian homicidal terrorist organization Hamas and recently has even been named as an unindicted co-conspirator with another American-Mohammedan organization for slush funding to Hamas. For CAIR that is the smoking gun that tarnishes its reputation as a moderate Mohammedan organization allegedly only concerned for the civil rights of Mohammedan-Americans. Anyone foolish enough to link themselves in anyway with CAIR thus supports CAIR’s Islamist agenda. Almontaser is one of many to have associated with CAIR.

    Then there is the KGIA itself. The soon to open Academy has been very reluctant to make public it so-called Arabic Cultural curriculum. I suspect the reason for that is it is almost impossible to separate Arabic Culture from religious Islamic teachings. Thus really the public school with the appellation of Khalil Gibran International Academy would not so much be an Arabic cultural Public School as an Islamic Cultural Public School.

    Hello! The Left, Secular Humanists and the ACLU have been fighting for more than half a century to keep any inklings to Christianity out of the Public School system erroneously proclaiming the government would be endorsing or establishing a particular religion with tax payer money.

    Let us see: KGIA would be a school steeped in teaching its students Islamic culture; meaning teaching religion. Can anyone see the double standard?

    There is a blog that Freedman would list as part of the witch hunt on Almontaser that everyone should read. It is called
    Stop the Madrassas. Go there and you will get detailed information on how the New York Mayor and Public School Officials have stonewalled in providing transparent information probably due to some Politically Correct sense of honor. If anyone has been following the War on Terror, Islamofascism and Islamists at home and abroad then you should be fully aware the defeatist and the appeasement mind of Politically Correctness is one of the hugest factors in gaining victories over terrorism globally.

    Samuel G. Freedman should think of that and write a fair, balanced and realistic article about Almontaser and/or the KGIA.

    Wednesday, August 29, 2007

    Christians that Support a Palestinian State Miss the Biblical Picture

    I was unaware that there were some Evangelical organizations and Ministers that actually support the creation of a sovereign Palestinian State. I am aware many Mainline Christian denominations indeed support such a travesty and even malign Israel’s Jewish State to defend themselves from so-called Palestinian Arabs.

    BUT Evangelicals supporting a two-State existence is astounding! I am particularly astounded because those that claim leadership of so-called Palestinian Arabs are blood thirsty terrorists with the end goal to destroy Israel and Jews from the land.

    Do not be persuaded that President Abbas of the Palestine Authority (PA) and Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) has suddenly become a moderate Arab Mohammedan willing to negotiate for peaceful coexistence with Israel. The PA points of negotiation if accepted by Israel will be the demise of the nation and potentially lead to a 21st century holocaust; viz. the total fall back of Israel to pre-1967 borders (which includes part of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount) and the so-called right of return of Arabs that fled Israel when the Arab world surrounding Israel invaded with the intent of destroying the Israeli State.

    Jerusalem and the Temple Mount are sacred to Judaism and have been so much longer than the existence of Mohammedanism. Flooding Israel with Arabs or more precisely, the descendants of Arabs that fled Israel in 1948 at the behest of expectant victory thirsty Arab invaders will terminate the Jewish State. Palestinian Arabs are fully aware of this!

    Thus You
    MUST READ an open response letter to this minority of Evangelicals from the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem (ICEJ), a Christian organization residing in Israel with chapters extending world wide. The ICEJ is more representative of the majority mindset of Evangelicals.

    Saudi Arabia: The Islamist Cage

    Youssef Ibrahim writes about Saudi Arabia from the perspective of former CIA Agent Robert Baer. The picture is not pretty. The picture painted of Saudi Arabia is that of an evil Mohammedan Kingdom bent on global subversion via Wahhabi fundamentalism coupled paradoxically with wealthy Saudis living the life of a Western hedonist.

    Think of that! Next to Israel, Saudi Arabia is considered by many (especially pro-Arabists) to be central as an American ally in the Middle East as well as a source of political stability. Indeed the fact is Saudi Arabia via the dissemination of evil propaganda and the duplicity of the most corrupt versions of Western hedonism is emerging as an enigmatic source of political instability in the Middle East.

    This polarity of Wahhabism and hedonism could topple the Saudi Monarchy or the entire royal family much as the Shah of Iran was deposed. It just takes one moronic President in the image of Jimmah Carter for that to happen.

    JRH 8/29/07

    Saudi Arabia: The Islamist Cage

    August 27, 2007
    The New York Sun (Print Version)

    A former prime minister of Pakistan, Nawaz Sharif, recently declared he was returning home to try to regain power after six years of exile — in Saudi Arabia. The day that the monster of Uganda, Idi Amin, was removed from power in 1979, he flew to a country where sanctuary as a Muslim African leader would be guaranteed upon his arrival — Saudi Arabia.

    And in 1970, immediately following the death of an Egyptian dictator, Gamal Abdel Nasser, the leadership of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood movement returned home in droves to try to Islamize their native land — after two decades in Saudi Arabia.

    Thus, Saudi Arabia ever expands its fundamentalist cage.

    Robert Baer, a 20-year veteran of the CIA and the author of "Sleeping With the Devil: How Washington Sold Our Soul for Saudi Crude," has often described the Saudis as the world's primary financiers of terrorism, the source of much of Al Qaeda's leadership, and an incubating station for radical Islam.

    Though such activities have come back to haunt the Saudis and their allies in America — Islamist terror struck home in 1995, 1996, and 1998 bombings, two American embassies were attacked in Africa, and the USS Cole was bombed in Yemen in the leadup to the attacks of September 11, 2001 — the Saudi system continues to perpetuate the model.

    The reason, according to Mr. Baer and other Middle East analysts, is that Saudi Arabia runs on two currencies: the riyal and Islam.

    Neither Saudi society nor its ruling establishment can escape: All of its constituent elements — from business and charity to religious instruction, law enforcement, and foreign relations — rattle inside the cage of the country's fundamentalist obsessions: The Saudi flag contains a Koranic verse. The Saudi monarch wraps his authority in Islam as "the custodian of Mecca and Medina." Saudi foreign aid is based on building fundamentalist madrassas and mosques, supporting such fundamentalist groups as Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, and spreading Koranic instruction worldwide.

    Arab and Muslim expatriate workers who have lived and worked in Saudi Arabia — easily numbering 50 million over the last three decades — return imbued with a model of militancy that duplicates an Osama bin Laden-style path toward jihad against their home societies.
    This vicious cycle mattered little when oil was cheap and the Saudis were a mere curiosity. But Saudi Arabia's power grew as it was transformed into a prime energy source in the 1970s, a huge financial influence in the 1980s, and an immense lobbying presence in the 1990s.

    By the late '90s, there were full-size mirror images of Saudi Arabia's stilted brand of Islam in Egypt, Pakistan, Somalia, the Philippines, Chechnya, Bosnia, and Kosovo, as well as among Muslim communities in Europe, Australia, and America. More mirror images are in the making.
    In one of his many interviews since leaving the CIA, Mr. Baer gave an interesting analysis of the elements that make for the creation and exportation of this model, describing Saudi Arabia as both hapless and evil.

    "They feel humiliated by colonialism, by the United States, by Israel — call it what you want. They feel they are citizens or subjects of a country that has never fought a war, and yet spends so much money on defense. They're humiliated that they don't take the Israelis on, because their army is worthless. They sit around and they read the Koran. And they get on these Islamic Web sites, and they watch Al-Jazeera. And they go to the mosque."

    In other words, the Saudis do little except rattle around within the cage of their own fundamentalism. This deep confusion is reflected throughout the ruling family, which contains both princes who are Westernized — in such vulgar aspects as drinking, womanizing, gambling, and wearing diamond-studded Rolex watches — and others who leave a mosque only to enter a charity that nurtures madrassas turning out little bin Ladens.

    Their schizophrenia is exemplified in such global personalities as Prince Al-Walid bin Talal, a multibillionaire businessman who simultaneously invests his billions in America while funding both the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which is the American chapter of the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood.

    In the end, the Saudis are just rattling around in their cage. A society with no social project except to produce more Muslims, deeper Muslims, better Muslims, ends up as one that produces Muslim fanatics and terrorists.

    Now, with oil prices having moved north of $70 dollar a barrel, a lot more trouble will be coming our way out of the Saudi cage.

    The original New York Sun URL:

    © 2007 The New York Sun, One SL, LLC. All rights reserved.

    Tuesday, August 28, 2007

    You'll LOVE The North American Union!

    I like the Constitution Party which is proud of their third place status of political strength based on voter registration. However I doubt I will cast an actual vote for a Constitution Party candidate except as a protest to a dubious nature of both a Democrat (which I would never vote for) and a Republican.

    Real politics in America is currently the strength of a two Party system in the perception of the lackluster electorate. However if the Constitution Party ever or actually became a viable contender to replace the Republican Party as the closest thing to Christian Conservativism, I would vote Constitution Party.

    I say all this for I am on the Constitution Party E-Newsletter list.

    The Communications Director – Mary Starrett – has posted on the last E-Newsletter that I have received from the Constitution Party. Starrett writes the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) and the North American Union (NAU) under the guise they are mechanism to unite Canada, America and Mexico as a single nation.

    President Bush has labeled such thinking with the disdain of Conspiracy Theory. Whether Bush is serious or deluded, there is
    documentation to suggest at the very least a “stealth evolution” toward such a tri-partite union.

    JRH 8/28/07

    Poisoned Food, Tainted Toys & Job Loss: Like The Results Of NAFTA? You'll LOVE The North American Union!

    Mary Starrett, Communications Director
    Constitution Party E-Newsletter
    Mon 27 Aug 2007 10:02:55 PM EDT

    Coalition Urges President To “Tear Down The Wall Of Secrecy” At Quebec Merger Summit While U.S. Congressman Urges President To Build UP The Border Wall.

    Lancaster, PA/ August 27, 2007 The recent Quebec
    Security and Prosperity Partnership Summit held at Montebello, Quebec drew attention to a proposed merger of the U.S., Mexico and Canada. The event, attended by President George Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexico’s President Felipe Calderon drew hundreds opposed to the plan.

    Former Director of the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity and current Chairman of The Conservative Caucus and the Coalition to Block the North American Union, Howard Phillips addressed those gathered to oppose the SPP in Canada. Phillips said, “President Bush, tear down the wall of secrecy. Behind closed doors, step-by-step, the leaders (of the three nations) are setting the stage for…a North American Community and, ultimately a North American Union… (which means we would lose authority) over our economy, our judiciary and our lawmaking institutions”.

    Phillips founded the
    Constitution Party in 1992. The third largest party based on voter registration (Ballot Access News), the Constitution Party is the only political party with a resolution to oppose the SPP/NAU scheme as a threat to America’s constitutional government.

    President Bush asked by a Fox News reporter for explicit denial of a plan to integrate the three countries, demurred and ridiculed opponents instead. Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of the New York Times bestseller "The Late Great U.S.A: The Coming Merger with Mexico and Canada" commented: "That’s exactly the same type of response Europeans got from their leaders, even as the EU noose was tightening around the necks of the millions who wanted nothing to do with a European super-state".

    During the SPP Summit in Quebec, where Bush was called on to “tear down the wall of secrecy” surrounding the covert merger, a United States Congressman was calling on the president to build a wall to secure our border with Mexico. While the president was in Canada denying a plan to integrate North America, California Congressman Duncan Hunter delivered a letter to Bush saying, "It is my understanding that approximately $800 million is currently available for (fence building). Despite this funding, only 17.9 of the 854 miles of fencing called for in the Secure Fence Act have been completed as of Aug. 10, 2007."

    The Constitution Party joins Congressman Hunter in calling for immediate efforts to complete a wall at our southern border and joins with those opposed to the SPP/NAU calling for a tearing down of the wall of secrecy surrounding any plans to merge the United States, Mexico and Canada.


    23 North Lime Street
    Lancaster, PA 17602

    Monday, August 27, 2007

    Listen to David Barton

    David Barton is an influential person in Evangelical circles in getting out the Christian view of American History. His mission is to energize Christians to reestablish a Christian political influence in America based on a history of “its constitutional, moral, and religious foundations.” The base of Barton’s mission in life is delivered through the organization known as Wall Builders.

    The Wall Builders “about” page is huge in defining its purpose and goals. Here is the
    Overview paragraph on the “about” page:

    WallBuilders is an organization dedicated to presenting America's forgotten history and heroes, with an emphasis on the moral, religious, and constitutional foundation on which America was built-a foundation which, in recent years, has been seriously attacked and undermined. In accord with what was so accurately stated by George Washington, we believe that "the propitious [favorable] smiles of heaven can never be expected on a nation which disregards the eternal rules of order and right which heaven itself has ordained."

    Slanted Left critics of Barton disdain his credentials because his earned academic degree is a Bachelor Degree from a private Christian university – Oral Roberts University. The intimidated Left spew criticism indicating only a PhD can only be considered an expert. You know like the Professor (
    no PhD) wacko Ward Churchill who has been academically discredited and fired.

    Leftists hold plagiarist Churchill in high regard yet disdain Barton who backs his conclusions with documents. Indeed Leftist watch dog People for the American Way heap academic weakness on Barton citing Barton’s own website and Slanted Right organization as
    resource proof of historical ineptitude yet not providing one iota of substantial citation to disprove Barton’s assertions. The fact is the Left revise history to punch a square peg into a round hole of secular humanistic relativism while the people like Barton back up history with documentation.

    Now I have stated my reasons for validating David Barton to set up a must read essay of his I found at a Christian Ministry website known as Visionary Advancement Strategies at an InJesus Group. The essay presents the foundation as to why Christians should engage in politics because politics has removed the Biblical foundations that have made America strong.

    Proceed to the essay:

    Sunday, August 26, 2007

    Iran Vows to Use 'Smart' Bomb on Enemies

    If Paul Williams shows that al-Qaeda is preparing a nuke strike in America, consider the progress of a nuclear WMD Iran; particularly since Iran contends they have developed 2000 lb smart bombs. Further consider if the “2000 lb” is replace with a nuclear war head; especially since Iran has joined Islamofascist terrorists with the call to wipe Israel off the map.

    JRH 8/26/07

    Iran Vows to Use 'Smart' Bomb on Enemies
    Sunday, August 26, 2007 11:57 AM

    TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran vowed Sunday to use a new 2,000-pound "smart" bomb against its enemies and unveiled mass production of the new weapon, state television reported.

    The government first announced development of the long-range guided bomb Thursday, saying it could be deployed by the country's aging U.S.-made F-4 and F-5 fighter jets.

    "We will use these (bombs) against our enemies when the time comes," Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najjar said on state television Sunday.

    Iran often announces new weapons for its arsenal, but the United States maintains that while the Islamic Republic has made some strides, many of these statements are exaggerations.
    The broadcast included a brief clip of a fighter jet apparently dropping one of the bombs, which destroyed a target on the ground.

    The defense minister continued his threats as state television showed him unveiling a mass production line for the weapon in Tehran.

    "We will use this weapon where we want to ... hit enemy's strategic and defense targets," Najjar said. "This will be used against our enemies, against those who violate our land and air space."
    Israel said the claim underlines its concerns over Iran's arms buildup.

    "All countries of the Middle East, Israel included, are concerned about expansionist Iranian policies, and about their aggressive military arms buildup," Israel's Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev said. "There is no doubt that the regime in Tehran poses a very real threat to the peace and security of the region as a whole."

    The United States and Israel accuse Iran of developing nuclear bombs, a charge Tehran denies. Iran's president has said Israel should be wiped off the map and Israel considers Iran its main enemy.

    Emanuel Winston, a Middle East analyst at the Houston-based Freeman Center for Strategic Studies, said Thursday that Iran's smart bomb claim sounded "plausible" but said that it would be less dangerous than a missile development program given the limited range of the country's aircraft.

    Najjar was more aggressive, saying the bomb "remarkably increases Iran's defense capabilities."

    Iran launched its own arms development program during its 1980-88 war with Iraq in response to a U.S.-led arms embargo. Since 1992, the country has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers, and missiles.

    Earlier this month, Iran said it had started industrial-scale production of its own fighter jet, known as Azarakhsh or Lightning, to upgrade its elderly air force, much of which dates from before the 1979 revolution.

    Iran last year test-fired a "ultra-horizon" missile, two powerful torpedoes and a Fajr-e Darya missile capable of avoiding radars and hitting several targets simultaneously using multiple warheads during large military maneuvers in the Persian Gulf.

    Associated Press writer Josef Federman in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

    © 2007 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
    ©2007 All Rights Reserved.

    Saturday, August 25, 2007

    MSM and Murtha Public Convictions of Haditha Marines Proving False

    The so-called Haditha Massacre was supposed to have occurred in the 2005. The Mainstream Media and Representative Jack Murtha (Capt. Corruption of the Democratic Party) crucified three Marines publicly based on Insurgent Terrorist propaganda rather than the investigative facts. I have actually posted voluminously on the Haditha Massacre hoax on the SlantRight website. You can search the thread there, the last post is HERE.

    Two of the three Marines have been recommended NOT to be prosecuted because the action taken was in line with their training and rules of engaging the enemy. I expect the third Marine to be on that exoneration list. When that happens, the incident in Haditha will not be a heinous massacre but an act of engaging the enemy that resulted with collateral damage. Most likely the tragedy of the death of women and children was the result of human shields or complicity with hiding terrorist insurgents.

    There is a
    movement to have Capt. Corruption apologize for his heinous remarks that surely affected the reputation of innocent Marines and became public humiliation to Marine families. Murtha’s well publicized comments should result in a very public apology to the Marines and their families.

    Murtha’s Haditha comments:

    Murtha responded with a bit more detail: "They actually went into the houses and killed women and children. And there was about twice as many as originally reported by Time." Even then, his comments captured little attention and were not front-page news. (Washington Post Sunday, June 4, 2006; A01)

    These are despicable words for something proving to have resulted under different circumstances than what the MSM and Murtha malignantly intoned toward the Marines fighting for freedom and an Iraqi opportunity at cohesion.

    The Washington Post is now reporting on page A10 that “an Haditha Investigator” is
    recommending that a second Marine under investigation should join another Marine in having ALL charges dropped in regard to the Haditha incident.

    Oklahoma Law Causes Exodus of Mexicans from Tulsa

    Oklahoma has passed a State Law that mandates stiffer measures against illegal aliens, meaning seeking and deporting. A Hispanic businessman estimates that 25,000 Mexicans have fled Tulsa, OK alone.

    Pro-Latino groups decry the new Law as fostering racial hate. Anti-illegal alien groups disagree, the Law targets people who break the Law regardless of race, religion or creed.

    In the
    WorldNetDaily article where I read this information you can sense the Leftist victimization guilt trip that restaurants and menial jobs will be affected thus hurting the economy of Tulsa.

    There is a hint that the Oklahoma Law will be taken to the Judicial System because of claims it oversteps Federal authority, i.e. the (ineffective lame Federal) Federal Law is easier on illegal aliens. What!? It is against the Federal Law for illegal aliens to be in America, just because a State proceeds with stiffer guidelines to enforce the Federal Law does not the State Law is overstepping its boundaries.

    As for the economy taking a hit because of an exodus of Mexicans: Is the implication that breaking the law aids economy? Is it the implication that illegal immigrants receiving the privileges of a free public education and government entitlements are an aid to the economy and tax payers of Oklahoma or America for that matter?

    Now I am fully aware that the majority of illegal alien Mexicans are hard working people trying to improve their quality of life or the quality of life of family back in Mexico with American money; however with the immigration of honest hard working illegal aliens is also a conduit to illicit felonious drug and gang businesses. That definitely does not help the economy of Oklahoma or America.

    I offer no solutions for there are not any easy solutions which are beneficial to the hard working the Mexicans and the American citizens. Mass deportation is not an answer nor is mass amnesty. The former is to expensive enmasse and the latter will permit the criminals to stay in America along with the hard working Mexicans.In the process of finding a solution it should not be the American citizens that take the hit in taxes or becoming the potential victims of drugs, career criminals or gangs. If a hit should be taken it should err toward the ones already breaking the law, not the law abiding.



    Mandatory deportation has illegals on the runState law limiting benefits looms, an estimated 25,000 take to road
    © 2007
    Posted: August 25, 2007 1:00 a.m.

    EasternThousands of Hispanics have fled the Tulsa, Okla., area in the shadow of a looming state law that limits benefits and mandates deportation for illegal aliens, according to a
    report from KTUL television in Tulsa.

    The state of Oklahoma recently approved a new law that requires deportation for illegal aliens who are arrested, and limits benefits and jobs to those individuals. The report said in East Tulsa, where a community of Hispanics has grown over recent years, there's been a sudden drop in population.

    Business owner Simon Navarro has been in business there 11 years, and said the tough law has chased away 30 percent of the state's Hispanic population.

    "Two months ago I heard 25,000 Hispanics have left Oklahoma," he told the station. "They are leaving.

    A lot have already left. "People are leaving," he said. "They're scared of the sheriff."

    A spokesman for
    Tulsa's Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Francisco Trevino, said he believes the law – and its results – will hurt restaurants, construction companies and other service corporations such as lawn care.

    "They do everything we don't want to do," he said.

    Homebuilders also have expressed concerns.

    "Sitting here today I understand it's about rounding up criminals, and illegals," said Paul Kane. "But, the Hispanics are fleeing Oklahoma because they think an anti-Hispanic environment is being created."

    However, authorities are making their preparations for a full enforcement of the law when it takes effect in November.

    Deputies from the Tulsa County sheriff's office are going through training to handle the apprehension and deportation procedures that are being set up. Their training will prepare them to handle the multiple duties of deputy sheriff as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

    When they are finished they will be prepared to identify illegal aliens who commit crimes, and make sure they are deported.

    Officials say many of those departing apparently are heading either to Kansas or Arkansas. But that may not be for long, since Arkansas is about to adopt a law similar to Oklahoma's, and Kansas is considering a similar move.

    Tulsa County Sheriff Stanley Glanz told KTUL that the impact of the illegal alien population is evident all over, especially in the jail.

    "We see the effects of gangs, we see the effects of illegal immigrants, we see the effects of drugs, we see the effects of methamphetamines," he said.

    "We want to go after the criminal element that we have in this community," added U.S. Rep. John Sullivan.

    "People that commit crimes, drug trafficking, murder, rape, DUI, carrying a concealed weapon." The newly trained officers will be on the job as early as October, before the November effective date of the new law.

    They say the bottom line is that illegal aliens in Tulsa County who commit a crime will be deported.

    The state law still may face a legal challenge. Miguel Rivera of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders said it could be in federal court as soon as Oct. 1.

    He said the argument likely would be that Oklahoma's House Bill 1804 pre-empts federal immigration law, which is much more lenient than the Oklahoma statute.

    The new effort to tighten and enforce immigration limits has prompted a severe reaction. Several billboards have gone up questioning the new law.

    One, funded by the United Front Task Force, asks, "Is it OK for Oklahoma to have a law that promotes hate among people?"

    The other, by the American Dream Coalition, shows a tearful girl clutching a teddy bear with the statement, "My mommy is not a criminal. She is a hardworking Hispanic woman."

    But on the television station's forum page, a listener responded: "We need to put up more signs that say: OKIES don't hate illegal immigrants they just want them legal! Deport all illegal immigrants now."

    The Republican who wrote HB 1804,
    Randy Terrill of Moore, said the plan doesn't discriminate, harass or single out anyone, unless they are breaking the law.

    "This isn't about whether you are for or against immigration, or for or against immigrants. It doesn't matter what your skin color is or if you speak with an accent. What matters is if you are in the country legally or illegally. The only people threatened by House Bill 1804 are those who choose to break the law," he said.

    It eliminates most taxpayer subsidies for illegal immigrants and allows state and local law enforcement officers to verify the residency status of those arrested. It also cracks down on business owners who employ illegal immigrants.


    Oklahoma Law Causes Exodus of Mexicans from Tulsa
    John R. Houk
    © August 25, 2007


    Mandatory deportation has illegals on the run
    Copyright 1997-2007 All Rights Reserved. Inc.

    Friday, August 24, 2007

    Democrat From Washington State Supports Troop Surge

    I grew up in the great Pacific Northwest, in Washington State in particular. I have always considered the beauty of Washington God’s gift to America; however I am a bit prejudiced with that notion by virtue of growing up there.

    I made the mistake of moving to Oklahoma, it was only a mistake because I stayed. Oklahoma is actually closer to my political spectrum than the beauty of God’s Country – Washington.

    You see great State is currently disposed to being Moonbat Liberal. This is sad for the Moonbats live mostly on the west side of the Cascades that partitions Washington and Oregon. The west side comprises roughly one/third of the State yet two/thirds of the population. Thus two/thirds of the land mass are usually shouted down by the one/third of the land mass politically.

    Now why would I be burdening my readers of the place I consider home? I ran across an interesting piece of information from the Neo-Neocon Blog: Strongly anti-war Democratic Representative Brian Baird has is publicly saying to give the Troop Surge an opportunity to work.

    I almost fell of my chair when I read a Washingtonian Moonbat had switched to support of the Surge!

    JRH 8/24/07

    Brian Baird comes out for giving the surge a chance
    August 24th, 2007

    Rep. Brian Baird, Democrat from Washington state, has written this extraordinary piece appearing in today’s Seattle Times.

    Baird has been one of the more consistently anti-Iraq-War members of Congress. How do we know that? He voted against the invasion at the outset, and has been consistently and strongly critical of the decisions the Bush administration made in waging it.

    That hasn’t changed, as you can tell by reading his column. No, Baird hasn’t become an apostate; he still thinks the war was a mistake.

    Many of the antiwar Democrats have done some moderate backpedaling since it has become apparent that the surge might indeed be achieving some of its military goals. But Baird has gone further than most in actually pleading for the policy to be given more time; as he writes, “our troops have earned” it.
    Why the change of mind? ... Read The Rest ...

    National Intelligence Estimate

    ColdHeartedTruth Blog offers an evaluation of the National Intelligence Estimate report. The blogs assumes the Left will cherry pick what it wants to see and not see and stick to their position of “cut-n-run.”

    ColdHeartedTruth Blog also reiterates the NIE report pretty much rephrases the agenda of the Surge Strategy signed off on by President Bush and executed by General Patraeus.

    Thursday, August 23, 2007

    Liberals Lie, Especially if Your Name is Clinton

    Ann Coulter knows it. Most Conservatives know it. I suspect Liberals know it too, but are afraid to publicly face the heat: Liberals/Democrats lie.

    Remember the Chris Wallace/Bill Clinton interview on Fox News in 2006? Slick Willie blew a screw and went off on a tirade to a very legitimate question: Did the Clinton Administration do enough to get bin Laden? (rough quote, probably not the exact wording)

    It turns out some MSM reporters –
    Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball – did some digging. Imagine that, the slanted left media digging dirt on the icon of living liberal ex-Presidents, I am nearly dumbfounded.

    Clinton yelled at Wallace like an eruption of Mt St Helens and proclaimed he did more to get bin Laden than anyone, including the present President. Indeed Clinton claim to have signed a Memorandum of Notification to assassinate bin Laden.

    Oops! Isikoff and Hosenball found otherwise, Clinton lied!

    (I am tipping my hat to
    Captain Ed.)

    The Old Wisdom

    Here is some wisdom from Victor Davis Hanson on borders mostly and a little of this and that of the political scenery.

    'America's Worst Enemy, Itself'

    Phil Magnan of the Biblical Family Advocates writes about the reasons the American cultural infrastructure is crumbling from within.

    Evidently the article was written on August 22 and picked up today on August 23, 2007. I received it from the Christian Newswire E-list.

    Magna’s essay is reminiscent of a Jeremiah message which if listened to could be transformative.

    JRH 8/23/07

    'America's Worst Enemy, Itself
    ' The Speeding Train and the Foolish Driver

    Phil Magnan
    August 23, 2007
    Christian Newswire E-list

    SAN DIEGO, Aug. 23 /Christian Newswire/ -- It isn't as though we are unfamiliar with the concept of the speeding train and the foolish driver who believes that they can outrun that train across the tracks; only to be crushed beyond recognition. But when you look at America, some Americans are wondering if we are in a similar race for our very own existence. Of course any person can point out some of the top dangers to America, whether it's bio-terrorism, illegal immigration or nuclear war. But the maddening reality is that we do not understand that WE are our own worst enemies. Here are a few examples that should make us begin to wonder if we are the largest group of lemmings to commit collective suicide.

    We want to protect ourselves from the onslaught of illegal immigrants and yet we have created the demand for cheap labor by having cheap abortion which kills millions of pre born Americans. Additionally, millions of Baby Boomers have looked forward to their retirement and yet they have promoted the aborting of millions of children who could have financially supported the now failing social security system. To add injury to insult, many children who did survive this abortion holocaust have been taught by their parents that it is acceptable to get rid of pre born babies if they are expensive and inconvenient. This widespread belief will make the case in the future, that Mom and Dad should also be euthanized if they are the same kind of burden to their children. In the interest of not offending anyone, the vast majority of Pastors will not speak on the issue of abortion from their pulpits. Yet these same Pastors will wonder whytheir churches are not filled with the youthful voices of children, who might have brought the gospel to their community.

    We have clearly patted ourselves on the back for being so tolerant of homosexuals, the cohabitation of heterosexuals and no fault divorce; when all the while destroying the very institution that is meant to keep our society stable; a godly marriage. But in typical hypocrisy we will continue to pity the broken home and the single parent family when we ourselves have encouraged it to continue by tolerating immoral relationships. Public schools are teaching promiscuity and homosexuality and are trying to figure out why so many young people have STD's and HIV. Even Police officers across the land will risk life and limb to protect children from harm and yet the very same officers will march in gay pride parades which encourage children to participate in the destructive lifestyle of homosexuality.

    We are so rightfully concerned about the environment, when the environment of our soul is so stagnant with hedonism, pride and materialism. With this kind of spiritual wasteland, we simply cannot offer the spring water of Christ to those who need it. It also seems rather strange that most environmentalists are very silent about our waterways being filled with the waste water of chemical abortifacient drugs that are destroying the very sexual makeup of ponds and rivers. They also seem very silent on the environment of the womb being destroyed by abortion and multiple sex partners. When will they actually care about pre born children as much as they care about baby seals?

    We invite people to come to our country to become citizens and yet we fall all over ourselves to accommodate their culture and their ways, instead of demanding that they become real Americans. We have somehow forgotten that they have come to our country because of the value of what we are as a nation. We should never replace that with the very culture that people flee. To make matters worse, we invite the people of Islam who are religiously bound to overthrow the countries they live in, whether by law or sword to come to our beloved country, living among us, giving sanctuary to those who want to destroy us.

    Remarkably we go all over the world to teach countries about representative government and yet Americans are seldom represented by their elected officials. Their parties prop up people that do not represent our best and brightest, but rather many wealthy, power hungry elitists. Most parties play both sides of the political fence thus misrepresenting their own party platform. Many of us are still waiting for real statesmen who fear God and obey His Word. It would be refreshing to have leaders who are not afraid to utter the words, "As for me and my house we will serve the Lord" and "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord", and actually mean it.

    We had such great disdain for being under the tyrants of Britain and were willing to pay the ultimate price to be free. But now we cower before the Federal government as though we no longer were a land 'for and by the people.' States have given up their constitutional sovereignty and instead wait in line to be blessed once again, by the kings of Washington DC. Our representatives are enamored with taxes and spending without restraint as they continue to create departments and programs outside of their God given authority and outside of the U.S. Constitution. Many times law enforcement, government leaders and judges punish the righteous, while funding and praising those who do evil.

    The godly prophets are considered fools and yet the fools are proclaimed wise. The profane is now called holy and evil is called good. We are certainly in trouble. Though I am very worried about bioterrorism, illegal immigration and nuclear war; the most frightful and troubling thought is that we are not only driving that car in a race with the train, but most Americans seem indifferent to the real coming train wreck of America. It appears that few are trying to stop and consider whether it worth losing such a race; but then again, we might either offend someone or be accused of being hateful. But shouldn't we be recapturing what it means to really love God, our neighbor and even ourselves?


    Christian Communication Network 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington DC 20006

    Biblical Family Advocates is a Christian pro family organization protecting and promoting the moral and spiritual interests of millions of families and churches throughout the U.S. and around the world.

    Wednesday, August 22, 2007

    Hamas Justifies Murdering Civilians on Iranian TV

    Osama Hamdan said in an interview that Israelis (ergo Jews) come from all over the world as enemy combatants on Palestinian (NOT) soil as occupiers of land rightfully belonging to Palestinian-Arabs.

    Read the Interview

    Hmmm …
    A religion of peace?

    CAIR Jackbooting American non-Muslims

    If you visited this website in the past you are fully aware that I believe the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) to be a fifth columnist organization that has duped the Mainstream Media (MSM) and public American officials alike that CAIR is a peaceful civil rights organization which is the standard bearer for Mohammedan-Americans in the United States of America.

    CAIR is
    fifth columnist in that its public representation is a lie; in fact CAIR closely associates with Mohammedan terrorist organizations. The most recent exposé on that matter is CAIR association with Hamas; however even the founding of the Islamist group has deep roots with Palestinian terrorism.

    Now CAIR is harassing American non-Mohammedans at their homes voicing their
    displeasure with private citizen opinions of Mohammedanism. One recent event involves a Marine veteran that has fought in Somalia and Iraq with a bumper sticker on his vehicle that read, “Jesus loves you, and Allah wants you dead.” Apparently a Mohammedan neighbor of this Marine reported his displeasure to CAIR. CAIR came to the door to “dialogue” about the bumper sticker. The local media supported the CAIR action as some sort of multicultural engagement of an overture for peaceful discussion.

    Patrick Poole points out a different scenario: What if Poole, Robert Spencer and Andrew Whitehead (noted vocal anti-Islamists) came to a Mohammedan’s door or better yet, a CAIR member’s door, and dialogued about why American Mohammedan organizations do not denounce Islamofascist terrorist or why do the distribute anti-American and “destroy” Israel (Jews) literature? What do you think CAIR and the politically correct MSM would do if such a visit was publicized for all to read?

    I will tell what would happen. There would be such a venomous display of fireworks verbiage accusing the trio of racist Islamophobia and how dare the trio use KKK tactics on the Mohammedans.

    Think about the agenda and the actual motives of a Mohammedan organization before you believe the schmooze you read and hear. Thoughtful consideration will lead a normal person to understand Mohammedan-American organizations (for the most part) are convoluted and are not the friends of Liberty and Justice for all.

    Mohammedan Dream: Global Caliphate

    There is a fringe Mohammedan group known as Hizb Ut-Tahrir Al-Islami. The English translation is roughly the Islamic Liberation Party. I say fringe because the group is outlawed even in some European nations and many Mohammedan nations (of which some of those have had a radical Islamist history). And yet Hizb Ut-Tahrir Al-Islami had a convention of sorts in Ramallah, the heart of the Palestine Authority (PA). Indeed the Islamic Liberation Party is a formal member of the PA. That is something to think about: a group that has an ideology that it is outlawed even in some Mohammedan nations is a member of the autonomous ruling organization of Palestine-Arabs seeking an establishment of a sovereign nation (recently Hamas usurped PA governance in the Gaza Strip, hence sarcastically known as Hamastan).

    What is so notable notorious about the Islamic Liberation Party that makes it newsworthy?

    The Islamic Liberation Party vigorously is advocating a Caliphate in which all Mohammedans can rally behind not only for unity but also to spread Mohammedanism globally by “persuasion.” Persuasion means by force, like in the bad ol’ medieval days when Mohammedanism was spread by violent conquest often torturing the conquered to submit to the will of Allah or die. It is the same ideal of Islamofascist terrorists such as Usama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. The first is an active terrorist organization the latter is a clandestine terrorist organization that supports other active terrorists such as Hamas.

    The ideological tenets explain why many Mohammedan nations have outlawed the Islamic Liberation Party: Mohammedan despots want nothing to do with anything that threatens their personal control. Twenty-first century Arab/Mohammedan nationalism is less about the spread of Mohammedanism and more about keeping former European powers (i.e. former Colonial Powers) outside of the control of Mohammedan lands. Many of the Arab nations in existence today are because they had their borders arbitrarily carved out by departing Europeans. This was an effort for Europeans to control the economics more than rule the Mohammedan peoples. Arab nationalism eventually shook off the chains of European economic control. Thus Europeans (and now America and China) used arms peddling as a carrot to find good grace with the despots. The despots have kept their people impoverished utilizing the Mohammedan faith to invoke harsh obedience; therefore a kind of grass roots religious look to the past has gained more and more favor of
    the glories of Mohammedan superiority complex of the past.

    Clearly Mohammedanism is slowly but surely being overtaken by this kind Islamofascist thinking that the Islamic Liberation Party espouses.

    Tuesday, August 21, 2007

    Another Call for MAD Deterrent Against Terrorism

    I personally have been an advocate for blowing up Mohammedan shrine cities or locations if Islamofascists successfully commit another act of terrorism on American soil. Yes, I know, it sounds so unchristian and medieval; nonetheless that is the nature of the enemy on the War on Terror.

    About a month ago I posted an article from
    Dr. Don Boys (International Director for Common Sense Today) in which he advocates a modified form of the old Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) deterrent against radical Islamists.

    Those who call Dr. Boys and me a warmonger might point out that officially not one Mohammedan dominated nation officially advocates Terrorism, thus the Terrorist Organizations of the world operate independently of a national agenda. The reasoning being Mohammedans and Mohammedan nations cannot be held accountable for the actions of the minority representative Mohammedan terrorists.

    The fact is clear is that the globe is fully aware that Mohammedan nations tolerate Terrorists on their sovereign land mostly by agreement with their ideology and some because of their weakness to enforce their sovereignty. The sovereign weakness in itself can be attributed to mightier Mohammedan nations that directly support Terrorist Organizations. In some cases the weak sovereign nations officially denounce terrorism but a majority of their populace is strongly behind the hated filled ideology of Islamofascism (Sunni and Shia).

    To the above scenarios I say tough! If there were any honesty in promoting global peace via a democratic paradigm, Mohammedan nations would squelch the wickedness of Islamofascism. The truth is most of the Mohammedan Middle East actually teaches in their schools, madrassas, Mosques and media forms the same hate toward America, the West and Israel that Islamofascist act out. I do not buy the statistics that a majority of Mohammedans in the Middle East find the actions of Islamofascist Terrorist organizations as reprehensible. In the back of mind I still remember the television cameras panning Palestinian-Arab cities showing Mohammedan citizens pouring into the streets in jubilant celebration that 9/11 occurred in America.

    Citizens of Saudi Arabia are responsible for distributing hate filled literature to Mosques and madrassas in America and Europe promoting the Wahhabi school of Mohammedanism. The very school of thought that al Qaeda and Saudi born Usama bin Laden perpetuate. The Muslim Brotherhood centered in Egypt is active in distributing their version of Mohammedan hated and medievalism globally as well. Hamas is a benefactor of the Muslim Brotherhood. Why has Egypt not shut down the Muslim Brotherhood? Because chaos would ensue in Egypt due the popularity among the Mohammedan citizens of Egypt. Shi’ite Hezbollah residing as an independent military/terrorist organization in Lebanon preaches their hate and acts of violence as sustained by the crazy Mullahs in Iran (via nearly puppet state Syria).

    I am sure I have left some Islamist nuts out that reside in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Indonesia and so on. My point is that Mohammedans can and should be held accountable for not deterring the actions of the so-minority Islamofascists.

    I hear from
    Terrorist experts that it is inevitable that some kind of nuke or dirty bomb will be detonated in America. How should America respond to the deaths of her citizens in potential numbers that will make 9/11 appear to be a picnic in comparison? Maybe American politicians, bureaucrats and diplomats should sit on their hands and wag their mouths about how America needs to engage in greater dialogue, diplomacy and negotiation? BY GOD NO!

    If a crude nuke is set off in America that will have proven those tactics DO NOT WORK WITH ISLAMOFASCIST TERRORISTS.

    A modified
    Mutually Assured Destruction plan might be effective, to wit: Voraciously publicize if crude nukes, dirty bombs or chemical weapons are unleashed in America; America will begin targeting Mohammedan Holy cities and Holy sites. This would be a MAD tit-for-tat warning that America would need to follow through.

    Presidential candidate
    Tom Tancredo has endorsed such a deterrent. It does not change my mind as to who I would like to win the Republican nomination; however taking such a politically incorrect stand is bold, courageous and raises his political credentials in my sight.

    Sovereignty, Illegal Aliens and Terrorists at Risk

    Whether the name is the “North American Union” (NAU) or “Security and Prosperity Partnership” (SPP), the term and/or agenda is surrounded in the kind of Conspiracy Theory enigma that is usually attached to the fringe worries of the Bilderbergers. The difference is the Bilderberger meetings are (often times) public or wealthy individuals that hold annual secret (content) meetings that are not connected to tax paying money. The SPP are government officials meeting and preventing the Press access to the content.

    In the case of America, the House of Representatives is accountable to its constituents in matters of funding from tax payer money. The NAU/SPP meetings that are so secretive have moved beyond the Conspiracy Theory of the Right to Congressional wondering of what is going on. The Bush Administration has not been forthcoming in reporting its agenda of North American integration and how it will affect American sovereignty. Until disclosure is made various House members (mostly Republican) are telling the Bush Administration to “Back off.”
    Here are the concerns of the anti-SPP crowd: sovereignty, illegal aliens and effortless entrance of Islamofascist terrorists.

    The only transparency the SPP crowd is making is the so-called economic plusses that could occur without addressing the anti-SPP crowd’s concerns.


    I am an admirer of the Constitution Party. Its
    platform for existence is actually closer to the Christian Right than the Republican Party. I would vote Constitution Party if it ever increased in popularity as a political party to be reckoned with; I am a bit of a neocon at heart and do disagree with some its platform. Nonetheless I like the emerging integrity that new politics that seems to attach to new idealism.

    Here is a Constitution Party
    take on the NAU and the SPP.


    Here is some detail about the SPP from a website known as
    USA Survival News: Evolution by Stealth.

    Monday, August 20, 2007

    Wars and Rumors of Wars

    There is no doubt that the Middle East is becoming more and more complex in the interaction of the nations and their agendas in the region.

    Who is aligned with whom? Does Israel have any friendly Arab nations that will fight on its side? Since the Palestinian-Arab people are apparently divided between Hamas and the Palestine Authority, will the PA become an ally of Israel to squash Hamastan? Will Israel attack Syria? Will Syria attack Israel? Will Hezbollah attack Israel at the bequest of Iran? Will Shi’ite Hezbollah team up with Sunni Hamas (add a smidgeon of the Syrian military into the mix) in a two front assault on Israel with Iran waiting in the background to decide whether or not to become personally involved in such a fracas? Will Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Israel team up to confront Iranian aspirations to be the hegemon of the Middle East? Will America abandon the Middle East (and its Western Democratic ally Israel) to allow the nations to duke it out and enter a weakened battle weary area to indulge on perceived (depending who runs the White House) National Interests? OR will the dang Middle Eastern erupt into global war because of outside National Interests such as Russia, China, Japan, India, America and the EU? AND if a global war erupts who will side with whom?

    Yeah man this is what I am talking about: Wars and Rumors of Wars. I did not even mention transnational Islamist multiple terrorist organizations which are more numerous than just al Qaeda.

    Here is what got me thinking on this geopolitical lava dome ever growing until some kind of pressurized explosion occurs: Guy Bechor writing for the Opinion section speculates that all these juicy arms deals to Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Israel is a message that America will eventually pull out of the Middle Eastern region to allow those nations to deal with the nuke WMD aspirations of hegemonic hungry Iran.

    Now think about that speculation! Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi Sunnis), Egypt (Muslim Brotherhood Sunnis) and Israel (secular and religious Jewish Zionists) as a Middle East team against radical Shi’ites managed by Iran (including a remarkable smattering Sunnis). Could the Saudi’s and Egypt cooperate militarily with Israel for a common goal of neutralizing an Iran ramping up to become armed with nuclear WMD?

    The only thing I see is chaos!