Richard Haass, the President of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), suggests a “New Middle East” is emerging that will continually exclude the influence of America. The new influences in the Middle East will increasingly be how the area will manage the natural conflict between Sunni and Shia Mohammedans. The only thing the Sunni and Shia seem to be in complete agreement is the hatred of Jewish Israel.
Haass surmises that Saudi Arabia and Egypt will go nuclear to counter a nuclear Iran. I found it interesting that Haass did not mention an already nuclear Pakistan. Pakistan for the most part is Sunni, however it Pakistan’s rogue scientists that initially introduced nuke secrets to Iran.
Haass believes that a continued U.S. military presence in the Middle East can only harm American National Interests because of the distrust of Sunni and Shia of America. On the other hand America has to consider its primary ally in the Middle East. That ally is not Saudi Arabia! America’s primary ally is Israel. The only successful Western style democracy in existence in the Middle East is Israel.
Haass agrees with the Iraq Study Group Report that America should engage Syria and Iran pertaining to stability in Iraq. I still see this using gasoline to put out a fire. Syria and Iran have militaristic aims that center on the destruction of Israel. Why in the world would America enlist the help of terrorist promoting rogue nations as Syria and Iran?
The only possible reason for doing so is to sell out Jewish Israel to gain economic favor from an oil rich Mohammedan Middle East. In a Western perspective, this is placing greed above our own cultural ethics. I find the thought of this as reprehensible. It is an anti-Semitic move that would emerge as a 21st century Holocaust of Jews. Nuclear armed Sunnis and Shi’ites that hate Israel will result in yet another attack on Israel. These attacks have occurred frequently since 1948 whenever Mohammedans had perceived a collective advantage to rid the Middle East of a non-Mohammedan Jewish/Zionist government.
The globe’s first actual nuclear could be between sliver small Israel and confidently nuclear armed Mohammedans. I assure you the entire world would participate for one reason alone: the black gold resource of oil.
I am afraid the only way to resolve the crisis of the Middle East is considered currently as politically incorrect. The West must resolve to utilize some old fashioned imperialistic tactics to protect National Interests and Western Cultural Interests. The West must collectively use extreme prejudice to end the leadership behind Islamofascist radical Mohammedanism.
A usually polarized West (well America anyway) have a common enemy, that enemy is radical Mohammedanism. Radical Mohammedanism greatest desire and end game is to supplant Western Culture with its belief in Civil Rights and Liberty with a Mohammedan culture of intolerant Sharia Law. An allied front in the West must wake-up to this radical agenda.
Incidentally a majority of Mosques have their financial support in nations in which radical Mohammedanism is preeminent. The Wahhabis and Muslim Brotherhood of the Sunnis have funneled money into both terrorist organizations and European/American Mosques. Thus the affects of radical Mohammedanism is not merely an action that occurs in a far away land, increasingly it is becoming a localized phenomena.
Haass surmises that Saudi Arabia and Egypt will go nuclear to counter a nuclear Iran. I found it interesting that Haass did not mention an already nuclear Pakistan. Pakistan for the most part is Sunni, however it Pakistan’s rogue scientists that initially introduced nuke secrets to Iran.
Haass believes that a continued U.S. military presence in the Middle East can only harm American National Interests because of the distrust of Sunni and Shia of America. On the other hand America has to consider its primary ally in the Middle East. That ally is not Saudi Arabia! America’s primary ally is Israel. The only successful Western style democracy in existence in the Middle East is Israel.
Haass agrees with the Iraq Study Group Report that America should engage Syria and Iran pertaining to stability in Iraq. I still see this using gasoline to put out a fire. Syria and Iran have militaristic aims that center on the destruction of Israel. Why in the world would America enlist the help of terrorist promoting rogue nations as Syria and Iran?
The only possible reason for doing so is to sell out Jewish Israel to gain economic favor from an oil rich Mohammedan Middle East. In a Western perspective, this is placing greed above our own cultural ethics. I find the thought of this as reprehensible. It is an anti-Semitic move that would emerge as a 21st century Holocaust of Jews. Nuclear armed Sunnis and Shi’ites that hate Israel will result in yet another attack on Israel. These attacks have occurred frequently since 1948 whenever Mohammedans had perceived a collective advantage to rid the Middle East of a non-Mohammedan Jewish/Zionist government.
The globe’s first actual nuclear could be between sliver small Israel and confidently nuclear armed Mohammedans. I assure you the entire world would participate for one reason alone: the black gold resource of oil.
I am afraid the only way to resolve the crisis of the Middle East is considered currently as politically incorrect. The West must resolve to utilize some old fashioned imperialistic tactics to protect National Interests and Western Cultural Interests. The West must collectively use extreme prejudice to end the leadership behind Islamofascist radical Mohammedanism.
A usually polarized West (well America anyway) have a common enemy, that enemy is radical Mohammedanism. Radical Mohammedanism greatest desire and end game is to supplant Western Culture with its belief in Civil Rights and Liberty with a Mohammedan culture of intolerant Sharia Law. An allied front in the West must wake-up to this radical agenda.
Incidentally a majority of Mosques have their financial support in nations in which radical Mohammedanism is preeminent. The Wahhabis and Muslim Brotherhood of the Sunnis have funneled money into both terrorist organizations and European/American Mosques. Thus the affects of radical Mohammedanism is not merely an action that occurs in a far away land, increasingly it is becoming a localized phenomena.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment