.jpg)
President Clinton’s National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught removing and destroying classified documents after the Clinton Presidency and after the terrorism of 9/11.
The ranking member of the 110th Congress Oversight and Government Reform Committee Rep. Tom Davis (VA – R) has released a public statement stipulating the actions of Berger will not be extensively known (i.e. unless Berger blabs – that is unlikely) and thus the damage to National Security and the full picture of the September 11, 2001 attacks delivered to the 9/11 Commission was incomplete.
Can anyone say, “Yet another conspiracy to cover the butts of the Clinton husband and wife team.”? Here is the clincher: Berger is receiving a slap on the wrist for his treasonous acts.
The Berger Deal/Meal kind of places a perspective of whom and when Left Wingers go after what is believed to be government cover-ups or worse – crimes. Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald has wasted millions of dollars over Plamegate. The only indictment Fitzgerald has attained is on Scooter Libby (former Chief of Staff of Vice President Cheney) attacking Libby’s memory of the details of releasing information about CIA hack Valery Plame. Fitzgerald is still pressing Libby even after actual person acknowledged for the press release was Richard Armitage. Armitage is an old school Republican and pro-Arab, thus he is anti-Bush.
Millions of dollars spent on lies by Plame and hubby Wilson, punitively less dollars spent on Berger. Is the Left so in control of the Justice Department?
Berger’s actions have severely placed the validity of the findings of the 9/11 Commission in doubt. The doubt is not in the veracity of the findings, but in the information available to the Commission. If the information is skewed or absent the Commission Report cannot be trusted.
Then there are the Clintons. If Berger was acting on behalf of his former boss, what was he covering up? Was Berger covering up bad or incompetent decisions by the Clintons pertaining to terrorism? Was Berger covering up information that verified reasons for President Bush to attack Saddam’s Iraq and the Left did not want that confirmation to come out to the public?
As Representative Tom Davis has found, Americans may never know the truth behind Berger’s actions nor the motives for those actions. The crimes of the Left continue to go unanswered.
The ranking member of the 110th Congress Oversight and Government Reform Committee Rep. Tom Davis (VA – R) has released a public statement stipulating the actions of Berger will not be extensively known (i.e. unless Berger blabs – that is unlikely) and thus the damage to National Security and the full picture of the September 11, 2001 attacks delivered to the 9/11 Commission was incomplete.
Can anyone say, “Yet another conspiracy to cover the butts of the Clinton husband and wife team.”? Here is the clincher: Berger is receiving a slap on the wrist for his treasonous acts.
The Berger Deal/Meal kind of places a perspective of whom and when Left Wingers go after what is believed to be government cover-ups or worse – crimes. Special Prosecutor Fitzgerald has wasted millions of dollars over Plamegate. The only indictment Fitzgerald has attained is on Scooter Libby (former Chief of Staff of Vice President Cheney) attacking Libby’s memory of the details of releasing information about CIA hack Valery Plame. Fitzgerald is still pressing Libby even after actual person acknowledged for the press release was Richard Armitage. Armitage is an old school Republican and pro-Arab, thus he is anti-Bush.
Millions of dollars spent on lies by Plame and hubby Wilson, punitively less dollars spent on Berger. Is the Left so in control of the Justice Department?
Berger’s actions have severely placed the validity of the findings of the 9/11 Commission in doubt. The doubt is not in the veracity of the findings, but in the information available to the Commission. If the information is skewed or absent the Commission Report cannot be trusted.
Then there are the Clintons. If Berger was acting on behalf of his former boss, what was he covering up? Was Berger covering up bad or incompetent decisions by the Clintons pertaining to terrorism? Was Berger covering up information that verified reasons for President Bush to attack Saddam’s Iraq and the Left did not want that confirmation to come out to the public?
As Representative Tom Davis has found, Americans may never know the truth behind Berger’s actions nor the motives for those actions. The crimes of the Left continue to go unanswered.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment