The Law Suit brought by Philip Berg to challenge Barack Hussein Obama’s citizenship status to be constitutionally eligible to be elected President has not been a part of the Mainstream Media (MSM). Actually I can understand the MSM dismissal as newsworthy as to the particulars of the Law Suit.
Berg’s argument seems to be BHO has not provided a notarize Birth Certificate from the State of Hawaii. Further Berg’s argument is that BHO was born in Kenya, Africa.
So let’s presume all the above is true. Would that make Barack Hussein ineligible to be President of the USA? I mean I am no constitutional expert but I thought the qualifications was to be at least age 35 and American citizen born from at least one American parent. If I am wrong in that understanding someone point me to the constitutional law that is specific.
I am guessing Berg believes that a person has to be born on USA soil to qualify to be elected President.
So here’s the deal: Berg’s law suit was dismissed in Federal Court. Judge Surrick ruled Berg lacked standing to bring such a law suit because he was just a mere citizen of the USA. The implication a special citizen in government such as a Congressman or Executive Department are the only ones eligible to bring such a suit.
Now I think Berg’s law suit is frivolous thinking the Courts would rule anything against BHO; however Judge Surrick’s ruling restricts the typical U.S. citizen from questioning the legitimacy of a candidate for President questioning his citizenship.
THAT IS POORLY WORDED JUDICIAL HOGWASH!
If the Judge just would have did his job to rule on the law suits merits and decide to continue or not continue it is quite likely BHO would have been certified that his mommy was an American citizen. So what if it was discovered BHO was born in Kenya rather than in Hawaii. Mommy was an American citizen.
Now the dipstick Judge may have placed the election into a Constitutional Crisis if the Supreme Court rules there are indeed a “standing” for an American citizen to ask for proof of documented citizenship.
JRH 10/31/08
Berg’s argument seems to be BHO has not provided a notarize Birth Certificate from the State of Hawaii. Further Berg’s argument is that BHO was born in Kenya, Africa.
So let’s presume all the above is true. Would that make Barack Hussein ineligible to be President of the USA? I mean I am no constitutional expert but I thought the qualifications was to be at least age 35 and American citizen born from at least one American parent. If I am wrong in that understanding someone point me to the constitutional law that is specific.
I am guessing Berg believes that a person has to be born on USA soil to qualify to be elected President.
So here’s the deal: Berg’s law suit was dismissed in Federal Court. Judge Surrick ruled Berg lacked standing to bring such a law suit because he was just a mere citizen of the USA. The implication a special citizen in government such as a Congressman or Executive Department are the only ones eligible to bring such a suit.
Now I think Berg’s law suit is frivolous thinking the Courts would rule anything against BHO; however Judge Surrick’s ruling restricts the typical U.S. citizen from questioning the legitimacy of a candidate for President questioning his citizenship.
THAT IS POORLY WORDED JUDICIAL HOGWASH!
If the Judge just would have did his job to rule on the law suits merits and decide to continue or not continue it is quite likely BHO would have been certified that his mommy was an American citizen. So what if it was discovered BHO was born in Kenya rather than in Hawaii. Mommy was an American citizen.
Now the dipstick Judge may have placed the election into a Constitutional Crisis if the Supreme Court rules there are indeed a “standing” for an American citizen to ask for proof of documented citizenship.
JRH 10/31/08
1 comment:
US Constitution, Art. 2, Sect. 1:
No person except a NATURAL BORN Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President...
Post a Comment