Saturday, January 31, 2009

FBI to CAIR: Take a Hike


John R. Houk
© January 31, 2009


As I was scrolling through my usually massive email subscriptions that I often use as sources I came across some good news from Act for America. Apparently the FBI has cut off its relationship with the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) because of their connection to the Islamic terrorist organization Hamas.

Act for America is using the news to organize grassroots pressure to contact Congressmen and Senators to not listen to CAIR lobbyists who according to Act for America are preparing some sort of lobbying blitz with Congress.

Here is the action requested for American anti-Islamofascists to perform:

    FBI Cuts Off CAIR Over Hamas Questions

    !!! ACTION ALERT – CONTACT CONGRESS !!!



    Dear …

    Finally, the FBI has figured out that CAIR (the Council on American-Islamic Relations) is not an organization it should be dealing with. This “better late than never” bombshell is reported in the Investigative Project on Terrorism story below.

    Not only is this wonderful and welcome news that should encourage us that we are in fact seeing progress made in the effort to roll back the tide of Islamofascism. The timing is impeccable.

    We have learned that CAIR is planning a lobbying blitz in Congress next week. ACT! for America members, it’s time to take ACTION !!!

    STEP ONE:


    Send emails and faxes, starting today and continuing through the weekend, to your Member of Congress and two Senators asking that they not meet with CAIR given that the FBI has severed contacts with CAIR. Include the story below in your emails and faxes. (Click here to find contact information for your Member of Congress and Senators).

    STEP TWO:

    On Monday or Tuesday place a follow-up call to your Member of Congress and two Senators. Ask to speak to their Defense or National Security Legislative Assistant (LA). When you have the LA on the phone, ask (1) if they got your email or fax and the article; (2) if they read it; (3) if the Member of Congress or Senator is aware of the issue. If the LA has not seen or read the email or fax, send it again if necessary.

    If you don’t reach the LA, leave a message and phone number, and if you don’t hear back by the next day, call again!

    LET’S SEND A RESPECTFUL, CLEAR MESSAGE TO CONGRESS: THE FBI HAS CUT OFF CONTACT TO CAIR DUE TO ITS TIES TO HAMAS. CAIR WAS AN UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATOR IN THE HOLY LAND FOUNDATION TRIAL. MEMBERS OF CONGRESS SHOULD NOT MEET WITH CAIR.

    Forward this email to everyone you know! And email us at info@actforamerica.org to let us know what response you get from your contacts to Congress.

    http://www.actforamerica.org/


Here is the Investigative Project on Terrorism story on CAIR and the FBI that has inspired activity by Act for America.

JRH 1/31/09
*******************************************
FBI Cuts Off CAIR Over Hamas Questions

By Mary Jacoby
IPT News
January 29, 2009


The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has cut off contacts with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) amid mounting concern about the Muslim advocacy group's roots in a Hamas-support network, the Investigative Project on Terrorism has learned.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR was made quietly last summer as federal prosecutors prepared for a second trial of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF), an Islamic charity accused of providing money and political support to the terrorist group Hamas, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

CAIR and its chairman emeritus, Omar Ahmad, were named un-indicted co-conspirators in the HLF case. Both Ahmad and CAIR's current national executive director, Nihad Awad, were revealed on government wiretaps as having been active participants in early Hamas-related organizational meetings in the United States. During testimony, FBI agent Lara Burns described CAIR as a front organization.

Hamas is a US-designated foreign terrorist organization, and it's been illegal since 1995 to provide support to it within the United States.

The decision to end contacts with CAIR is a significant policy change for the FBI. For years, the FBI worked with the national organization and its state chapters to address Muslim community concerns about the potential for hate crimes and other civil liberty violations in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

But critics said the FBI improperly conferred legitimacy on CAIR by meeting with its officials, even as its own investigative files contained evidence of CAIR leaders' ties to Hamas.

Last autumn, FBI field offices began notifying state CAIR chapters that bureau officials could no longer meet with them until CAIR's national leadership in Washington had addressed issues raised by the HLF trial, according to people with knowledge of the notifications.

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper declined to comment Wednesday when the IPT called for comment. Before hanging up, Hooper said "We're more than happy to cooperate with legitimate media. But we don't cooperate with those who promote anti-Muslim bigotry."

In one letter obtained by IPT News, James E. Finch, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Oklahoma City field office, canceled a meeting of the local Muslim Community Outreach Program, a state-federal program designed to enlist Muslims in terrorism prevention and investigate reports of civil liberties violations.

"Regrettably, due to circumstances beyond my control, the meeting will be postponed until further notice as a result of the planned participation by the Oklahoma chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations," Finch's Oct. 8, 2008 letter to Muslim groups in the Oklahoma outreach program said.

Finch made clear the Oklahoma office valued its relationship with local Muslims. He said the stumbling block to further outreach was CAIR's national leadership.

"[I]f CAIR wishes to pursue an outreach relationship with the FBI, certain issues must be addressed to the satisfaction of the FBI. Unfortunately, these issues cannot be addressed at the local level and must be addressed by the CAIR National Office in Washington, D.C.," the letter said.

A spokesman for the FBI's Oklahoma City office referred questions about the letter to the FBI's national press office. In Washington, FBI spokesman John Miller said, "We've certainly been in contact with CAIR chapters" about the un-indicted co-conspirator designation. "The letter speaks for itself."

Letters with similar wording were sent in other states, people with knowledge of the matter said. It is not known how many letters were issued, but the FBI has had strong working relationships with CAIR chapters in states including Ohio, Michigan, Arizona and Florida.

Hamas was formed in 1987 as the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood, the global Islamic political movement that aims to spread the rule of Shariah, or Islamic law, throughout the world.

A North American branch of the Brotherhood supervised HLF, CAIR and other organizations to build political, financial and public relations support for Hamas, evidence at the HLF trial showed.

The U.S.-based Brotherhood formed a Palestine Committee, headed by Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzook, in 1988 during the first intifada uprising in Palestinian territories against Israel. Hamas's stated policy is for the destruction of Israel.

CAIR co-founders Ahmad and Awad were early active members of the Palestine Committee, evidence showed. Wiretaps recorded the two CAIR leaders participating in strategy meetings of the committee in the 1990s, and both were also on a phone list of its members, the evidence showed.

The first HLF trial in Texas ended in a mistrial in October 2007. In November 2008, the second trial resulted in convictions of five former HLF officials on all counts of providing material support to Hamas.

It is unclear what changed between the first and second HLF trials to make the FBI rescind its policy of outreach to CAIR. The un-indicted co-conspirator designations were made on May 27, 2007 in connection with the first HLF trial. Moreover, much of the evidence linking the CAIR officials to Hamas was aired in an earlier public trial in 2006.

CAIR, however, vigorously challenged the un-indicted co-conspirator designation as a violation of its First and Fifth Amendment rights, accusing the government of "demonization of all things Muslim" in a brief filed in the summer of 2007 with the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

The co-conspirator designation is "particularly insidious and ironic as CAIR is an organization dedicated to fostering acceptance of Muslims in American society and protecting the civil liberties of all Muslim Americans," CAIR's brief read.

The government filed a brief on Sept. 4, 2007 opposing CAIR's filing, arguing the group lacked standing to challenge the co-conspirator designation and that the matter was moot, as the evidence was already entered into the public record. The judge never ruled on CAIR's request.

The HLF trial showed that CAIR was formed to covertly influence US opinions of the Palestinian conflict and Islam, but without revealing its connections to Hamas.

For example, prosecutors introduced transcripts of wiretaps from a 1993 meeting in Philadelphia of the Palestine Committee, called to order by Ahmad (see page 10 of the hyperlink) and attended by Awad. In that meeting, Ahmad and others discussed the need to create a new political organization seemingly unconnected to Hamas or the Brotherhood.

In one excerpt, (see page 4 of the link) an unidentified male said: "We must form a new organization for activism which will be neutral, because we are placed in a corner, we are place in a corner. It is known who we are, we are marked and I believe there should be a new neutral organization which works on both sides."

CAIR was founded a year later, in 1994, by Ahmad and Awad. In March 1994, Awad was taped at Miami's Barry University publicly declaring his support for Hamas: "I am in support of the Hamas movement more than the PLO," Awad said.

A July 30, 1994 agenda for the Palestine Committee, seized by federal agents and introduced at trial, showed that "suggestions to develop the work" of HLF, CAIR and other organizations was on the agenda.

Under the heading "The need for trained resources in the media and political fields," the agenda said: "No doubt America is the ideal location to train the necessary resources to support the Movement worldwide."

By 1995, CAIR was conducting public relations work to counter the US detention of Mousa Abu Marzook, the Hamas official and Palestine Committee member who was also head of the Muslim Brotherhood in the US.

A transcript of an August 1995 phone call intercepted by government investigators showed HLF officials Shukri Abu Baker and Ghassan Elashi talking about CAIR's efforts (see page 12 of the link).

Days before the 2001 terrorist attacks, the FBI raided the offices of Infocom, a Texas internet company connected to HLF. CAIR's Nihad Awad appeared at a press conference outside Infocom headquarters to denounce what he called an "anti-Muslim witch hunt."

CAIR remained a vocal player in the public debate after 9/11. It developed relationships with members of Congress. FBI officials frequently attended CAIR fundraising banquets, and CAIR cited such contacts in its own literature and Web site as evidence of its good standing with the government.

_____________________________

FBI to CAIR: Take a Hike
John R. Houk
© January 31, 2009
____________________________________

FBI Cuts Off CAIR Over Hamas Questions

Mary Jacoby is an award winning reporter who has worked for the Wall Street Journal, Salon.com, the St. Petersburg Times, Chicago Tribune and Roll Call. She may be reached at
writetomaryjacoby@gmail.com
IPT Update:
http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/986


© 2009 The Investigative Project on Terrorism
.

Hate and Anti-Semitism Preached on Al-Jazeera

Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi On Al-Jazeera Incites Against Jews, Arab Regimes, and the U.S.; Calls on Muslims to Boycott Starbucks and Others; Says 'Oh Allah, Take This Oppressive, Jewish, Zionist Band of People... And Kill Them, Down to the Very Last One'

Transcript of Video on
MEMRI.

This video posted on YouTube by
abdull1425.


Friday, January 30, 2009

Obama Appeasement Reaction

Has anyone noticed that President Obama has not been in Office for even a month and already Islamic rogue nations and terrorists are verbally slapping his appeasement gestures?



JRH 1/30/09 (Hat Tip: The Liberal Lie, The Conservative Truth)

BHO, Gitmo and Global Leftists


Helle C. Dale writing for the Heritage Foundation has a brilliant essay concerning President Barack Hussein Obama and Gitmo.

In essence Dale writes about BHO becoming a slave to ‘hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil’ Leftists in America and in Europe. (Of course Helle did not use the word “slave” for that might be deemed politically incorrect.)

Helle points out that BHO will receive public acclaim from the global Leftists as long as a released Gitmo inmate (after closing) is involved in a major Islamic Terrorist attack in America or Europe that takes thousands of innocent lives – AGAIN.

My favorite part of the essay is this:

“It is not very clear, though, how much the president is in command of his own policy. During Friday's signing ceremony, Mr. Obama appeared not to know that he would be signing four separate orders and had to refer repeatedly to White House Legal Counsel Greg Craig for answers to questions from the media. Nor was he able to answer a question about the future of the detainees.”


Place a picture of Obama’s public confusion in your mind. Now remember eight years of the Mainstream Media (MSM) nitpicking President Bush about an act judged by the MSM a public gaffe. President Bush was skewered as a political moron by the MSM.

Could it be the Obamasiah is not all knowing and indeed does not know enough to manage his elected Administration? Hmm…

Maybe we could even flash back to the Leftists skewering Sarah Palin for her alleged inexperience even though she had managed the day to day business of an elected Alaskan executive coming to Office despite resistance from the good old boys of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

I wonder if McCain or Palin would have acted so confused in public on a major issue. O well. I was just wondering.

JRH 1/30/09

Susan Rice (UN Ambassador): Israel should LOOK at ...


Susan Rice (UN Ambassador): Israel should LOOK at Their War Crimes

Apparently President Barack Hussein Obama is
lap dogging his way into Western European style egalitarianism which could threaten the personal Rights of Americans guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

JRH 1/30/09 (Hat Tip: NeoPress Express)

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Gaza to Egypt and West Bank to Jordan: ...


Gaza to Egypt and West Bank to Jordan:
Will it Bring Israeli Security?

John R. Houk
© January 29, 2009


The
Leslie J. Sacks blog sent a Daniel Pipes essay pertaining to the Land of Israel and the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians.

The flash summary of the essay is that Israel remains a sovereign nation and the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians become part of Egypt and Jordan respectively.

For me this is something I have been advocating for a long time; however Pipes’ implication is that the West Bank (Judea and Samaria to Israel) be given to Jordan and Gaza be given to Egypt.

The thinking is that Egypt and Jordan are not adversarial with Israel any longer by virtue of recognizing the existence of the Jewish State and establishing diplomatic relations.

Let’s be frank though: All the past wars that Israel has won have centered around three central foes – Syria, Egypt and Jordan.

America’s hyperpower status has been a little tarnished by the humbling of economic factors and a lack of tenacious purpose that is supposed to be the end result of all wars – strategy to total victory.

There is an Islamic mindset of peace with the kafir only as long as
dar al-Islam is weaker, then if there is a perception of dar al-Islam strength the peace is thrown out in order to throw the out kafir.

Frankly I believe the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians will still be agitated toward the Land of Israel even though they may have been matriculated back into Arab sovereignty. I suspect that agitation will again light the fire of passion amongst the Egyptian and Jordanian masses to wipe Israel off the map for the sake of dar al-Islam.

So here’s thing: Gaza is such a speck of land I believe Israel could defend an Egyptian border as well as the present time. On the other hand, returning the West Bank to Arab sovereignty will leave Israel security as vulnerable as it was to invasion prior to 1967. AND I have not even mentioned the Golan Heights which Syria lost due to one of their invasions to drive Israel into the sea.

Of all the peace pursuits that have been on the table, Daniel Pipes’ idea does seem the most practical; however I am what may be called a
Christian Zionist. I strongly believe it is robbing Israel of its Biblical heritage by giving up the West Bank. You see the Arab view of the West Bank would include the Eastern part of Jerusalem liberated from Arab (i.e. Jordanian) control after the 1967 war (Six Day War) to drive Jews into the sea. The Jewish claim to the entirety of Jerusalem is paramount and above any mythology developed by Muslims to assuage Islam.

The Land is Israel’s!

Be sure
to read the Daniel Pipes essay posted at Leslie J. Sacks.

JRH 1/29/09

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

What's Behind Western Condemnation of Israel's War Against Hamas?


Here is a very interesting perspective of the vilifying by the Media of Israel toward Palestinian-Arabs with the marked absence of vilification of Arabs or Palestinian-Arabs concerning what they do to each other and to Israel.

JRH 1/28/09

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

What Message is Obama Sending…and to Whom?


I just finished reading an awesome analytical editorial of how Barack Hussein Obama is actually placing Americans at risk by redefining Bush’s methods to keep America terrorist free for a little over the last seven years since 2001.

The place to go is
RationalLiberty.com.


JRH 1/27/09

Allowing Sharia Law in a Western Nation

Here is a semi-orderly retreat of British cops in London in fear of Muslim rioters. This is an example of what happens to a nation allowing itself to comply with such maddening concepts as Sharia Law having the same legal standing as Western rule of law.

Wilders Prosecution a Threat to Liberty




Have you seen the movie short entitled Fitna? Well if you have not you should. The movie is an expression of Freedom of Speech put together by Geert Wilders.

The Netherlands justice system has decided to prosecute Wilders for this free speech because to criticize the ideology of Islam in a politically correct egalitarian society is a hate crime.

The irony is Wilders uses actual Quranic scriptures and matches them up with present day atrocities committed by Muslims who in reality are merely practicing what there Prophet Mohammed did by example.

Someone in the Dutch legal system has been talked into believing this is offensive to Islam.

So let us consider why this would be offensive to Muslims.

Are Muslims embarrassed about their Prophet who disseminated the word that became the Quran? That cannot be for then that would deny there faith.

Are Muslims offended because fellow Muslims deemed radical by the West are practicing the example of Mohammed by killing innocent men, women and children kafir (unbelievers) in an effort to strike fear and terror to convert Kafir to Islam or merely to kill kafir? If Muslims are offended by the murder of kafir a huge majority are not denouncing the terror.

Are Muslims offended because Fitna demonstrates Islam to be an archaic religion based on violent conquest that is evil by today’s standards? I am certain people who feel they have attained inner peace and fulfillment are extremely adverse to the concept their faith is violent; nonetheless to be a true follower of Islam is to believe the Prophet Mohammed and the Quran are infallible. That center piece of Mohammedan faith renders the practicing of peace Islam as a denial to the example of Mohammed and the Quran (not to mention the Hadith, the Sunna and so on).

Now let us consider why Secularists, atheists and people practicing a different religion other than Islam should be offended Islam.

Should kafir (unbelievers of Islam) be offended at Muslims who practice a faith that brings inner peace and fulfillment to their lives? That should ring a definite NO.

Should the kafir be offended about the way women are treated in Islam (believing and non-believing)? This is a definite YES. Islamic women at best are treated as inferior to their husbands or father. Islamic women at worst are treated as chattel or sex slaves diminishing their human rights and denigrating their humanity. It should be amazing to the kafir that a majority of Muslim women are in total acceptance of the Quranic position of women. They buy into the lie that the burka syndrome places women on a pedestal of purity and respect while being in denial of the position women lead in a Quranic-Sharia Law society.
Honor killings have been on the rise in Western societies because younger Muslim women are assimilating some of the ways of Western liberty.

Should the kafir be offended that
Sharia Law in general represents everything that is NOT Western Liberty and Civil Rights (especially in America).

Should the kafir in the West be offended that Muslim adherents are explosively demanding that special privileges be given them even though the same privileges are denied other religions in the West that are still the majority? YES ABSOLUTELY!

I could go on and on as to ascertain that the kafir should be offended by Mohammedanism but honestly I grow weary of researching the infamy of Islam.

In lieu of my unwillingness to carry on,
you kafir must read Caroline B. Glick’s essay on supporting Geert Wilders and Freedom of Speech – Western Style.

JRH 1/27/09



Monday, January 26, 2009

Haggard Needs to Practice Full Disclosure


Ted Haggard resigned his Pastorate of his New Life Church in Colorado Springs and he resigned as President of the influential (Christian Right) National Association of Evangelicals in 2006.

In case you have forgotten as to why Haggard resigned, it
was due to accusations of homosexuality.

When the story first broke publicly, Haggard denied everything. As the smoking gun evidence emerged the resignations followed.

I am saying the evidence (the exposing light) exposed the darkness. The darkness was more than being a homosexual. The darkness was prevaricating to his Church, his fellow leaders of the National Association of Evangelicals and to Christian Brothers and Sisters globally that had honored Haggard’s Office as a Pastor and a supposed man of God preaching the Truth of Jesus Christ.

Haggard intended to LIE until light exposed the darkness.

Here it is 2009 and I have recently discovered not only he lied about homosexual debauchery with a male prostitute, but he had
at least one other homosexual relationship with a member of his Church. I have to guess since Haggard even lied about another homosexual act, he could be covering other acts of Biblical perversions that he may be hoping the darkness will cover the light.

I know I must sound like I am being a little rough for a Christian Believer that believes in the Mercy and Grace of God through the Redeeming Blood of the Savior Jesus Christ.

Here is the thing. I have grown weary of trusted Christian leaders betraying their flocks and God-Seekers looking to be fed spiritually. It is apparent now that Haggard exploited his position of leadership to be a big dog preacher while simultaneously turning his back on his Lord Jesus Christ.

I have to honest I am blowing a little steam that I will probably have to ask forgiveness for. NOT only was Haggard a prevaricating hypocrite to Christians that believed he had an example of faithfulness, but Haggard was a prevaricating hypocrite to the poor souls that are trying to validate an alternate lifestyle that contradicts Biblical morality.

Haggard’s lying deceptive ways has to be perceived by practicing homosexuals as confirmation that Biblical morality is a mythical standard that does not apply to human being in the 21st century. I mean why would a homosexual listen to a Believer trying to explain the Good News of Jesus Christ (even under a Holy Spirit led anointing) sharing that humanity has been delivered from the darkness of this world system with Haggard as a reason to scoff at the Believer?

I read Haggard’s new story of prevarication knowing homosexuals are doomed to forsake the Risen Savior and that Believers may fall by choice under the delusion that Salvation is worthless under the power of the flesh life.

Come on Haggard! At least follow the example of once fallen Minister Jim Baker who fell morally and also according to the secular laws of the land. Baker did his time in prison and has brought everything to light pushing the darkness out of his life. Haggard, back on board of the light and the darkness will have no power over you and will put a huge dent in the dark example of your old man dominating your new man in Christ Jesus.

JRH 1/26/09

Actively Support Wilders’ Right to Free Speech


Geert Wilders is in the process of being railroaded by the European Left version of egalitarian politically correct liberty. European liberty is only freedom if it complies with a majority opinion of government bureaucrats and academics. If a person expresses himself in such a way to run contrary to egalitarian laws or majority views (even if the majority is shrinking) it becomes hate speech; ergo a crime to be prosecuted.

If you are an American this should make your sensibilities quake like the feeling of fingernails being drawn down a chalk board. NOT GOOD!

Ben’s Blog has alerted me that the World Wide Web is gaining greater momentum to support Geert Wilders’ expose on the wickedness of Muslims practicing what the Quran says how a good Muslim should act.

JRH 1/26/09


Sunday, January 25, 2009

History: Violent Islam Leading to Hamastan

Here is a brief history of the violence of Islam culminating to Islamic murderers known as Hamas.

Can Netanyahu Reverse Olmert/Kadima Damage?


Likud Party Benjamin (or Binyamin) Netanyahu is expected to whup the current ruling Kadima Party headed by Tzipi Livni and disgraced by current caretaker Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel.

Ehud Olmert in an effort to comply with multiple Western governments’ opinion has sold out to the idea that the creation of a sovereign Palestinian State which includes giving up land acquired via defensive wars from multiple invading Islamic Arab nations.

The fallacy of this thinking is evident in continued terrorism more recently by Hamas and yet includes so-called managed Islamic terrorists of the Fatah dominated Palestine Authority.

Benjamin Netanyahu represents the Israeli voters that view the Ariel Sharon initiated “Disengagement” as an Israeli security problem (secular) and a dissolution of Israeli heritage (religious). Olmert continued this Disengagement to the point of booting out tens of thousands of Jewish settlers from their property in the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) and Gaza.

Livni is trying to draw an image of Netanyahu as a person that will make Israel so right wing that it will harm relations with America.

Netanyahu says his government will not be right wing.

Even if Netanyahu takes a moderate path, any derailment of the American driven goal of creating a sovereign Palestinian State will probably run awry of President Obama’s continued Bush endeavors concerning Palestine.

If Netanyahu adds some metal to his backbone to indeed stand up to an Obama Administration directive to make a State out of Israel’s mortal enemies, will Obama toss Israel to the Muslim wolves?

JRH 1/25/09

Ben: Its Shari'ah, Stupid #20


I am personally uncertain of Ben’s qualifications however his scholarship is overwhelmingly excellent. You should check his blog often to at least receive a hint of the nature of Islam.

Ben’s post entitled “
Its Shari’ah, Stupid” is some insight of the violent nature of Islam. Although Ben does not mention it, it is also revealing as to why negotiations with any Arab calling themselves a Palestinian is an untrustworthy non-good faith negotiator.

JRH 1/25/09

Saturday, January 24, 2009

BHO Surrender will Lead to Islamic Attack in America


President Barack Hussein Obama – in effect – has surrendered to Islamic terrorists by declaring an end to the Global War on Terror (GWOT).

As this news spreads to transnational Islamic terrorists I expect swooning intoxication of blood lust for the kafir for these Islamic nut jobs will view President Obama’s surrender as a Jihad victory.

The Leftist reviled former President Bush protected an attack on American soil since the cowardly al-Qaeda sneak attack of September 11, 2001.

There is evidence that transnational Islamic terrorists have not given up on the idea of attacking the American Homeland, they have merely been thwarted.

After the Obama surrender, expect an attack sooner than later.

A ‘dirty bomb’ is a possibility however
a bio weapon is probably easier and my guess is to potentially take out more Americans than 9/11.

Last year, Dr. Jeffrey Runge, chief medical officer at the US Department of Homeland Security, told Congress that the risk of a large-scale biological attack on the nation is significant and the US knows its terrorist enemies have sought biological weapons. Runge said al-Qaeda is the most significant threat.

Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden has long shown an active interest in biological weapons. In the late 1990s, bin Laden set-up 19 chemical and biological weapons laboratories in Afghanistan stocking them with deadly pathogens: anthrax, plague, and botulinum toxins. He hired Ukrainian and Russian experts to train his people and, according to then-CIA director George Tenet, bin Laden trained his operatives “…to conduct attacks with toxic chemicals or biological toxins.”The group’s biological weapons expert, Midhat Mursi al-Sayid Umar, who was reportedly killed by a US missile in 2008, published a 5,000-page encyclopedia of jihad devoted to chemical biological warfare (CBW). Al-Sayid’s manual, which is available in print and on the Internet, provides instructions on how to manufacture rudimentary biological weapons.The availability of al-Sayid’s CBW cookbook makes it possible for independent jihadist cells like the AQIM to attempt to manufacture rudimentary biological weapons. That’s why it shouldn’t be a surprise when there are attempts to manufacture agents by franchise groups such as the 2003 incident in London where six Algerians were charged with plotting to produce the poison ricin and the 2005 French government claim that al-Qaeda cells in the Pankisi Gorge region of Georgia are producing anthrax bacteria, ricin, and botulinum toxin.
(
Robert MaginnisHumanEvents.com)


Does this sound like the end to the Global War on Terror? It is a Leftist delusion that a stroke of a pen will end GWOT. BHO’s surrender is merely adding fuel to the fire of future attacks on American soil.

JRH 1/24/09

Friday, January 23, 2009

Glick: History's tragic farce


Caroline Glick demonstrates that the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians are less interested in a sovereign State next Israel and more interested in obliterating Israel altogether. American Presidents continue to be deluded that a Palestinian State will bring a new age of peace and utopia to the Middle East. History has shown this to be more wishful thinking rather than real thinking.

JRH 1/23/09

Laksin: The War on Wilders


Jacob Laksin has a powerful essay on Geert Wilders and Freedom of speech. If you had not heard Wilders has actually been charged for incitement against Muslims for his movie Fitna. Evidently a portrayal of Quranic and Haditha words and lining them up with Muslim actions to educate the Western masses on Islam is a hate crime of incitement.

This is the future of Secular Humanist dominated democratic Republics and Constitutional Monarchies: Free Speech is ONLY that which is acceptable to Left leaning Secular Humanist government bureaucrats (Representative, Executive and Judicial).

JRH 1/23/09

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Susanne Winters Convicted for Speaking about Islam


I had just found out that Geert Wilders is being prosecuted in the Netherlands for speaking the truth about Islam. Now I am learning another European politician has gotten the same treatment: an Austrian court has convicted Susanne Winters of speaking that Mohammed a pedophile and to allude that Mohammedans can righteously (meaning Mohammedan Scriptural approval) participate in bestiality. I think the religion of peace only allows males this religious perk.

God help America if expressing one’s convictions concerning another religion is ever treated as a hate crime rather than Freedom of Speech.

In case you think Winters was actually inciting hatred read
Robert Spencer’s post on how Winters merely repeated the example of Mohammed as well as dead and buried Ruhollah Khomeini.

Do Mohammedans find it hateful when the kafir tell each other the truth about Mohammedanism?

JRH 1/22/09

The Fight to Keep Jihadists Locked Up Begins Today


Below is a Move America Forward appeal for funds to lobby against the closing of Gitmo. Personally I sense there are too many Leftists in power to prevent Gitmo’s closing; however I laud Move America Forward for telling why the war criminal prison at Guantanamo Bay should be remain open.

That reason being that valuable intelligence information has been extracted that has aided in keeping American soil free from major Islamic terrorist attacks and intelligence about Islamic terrorist operations in foreign nations like Iraq and Afghanistan.

The thing the Left oriented Mainstream Media fails to inform Americans about is that many have been released from Gitmo and indeed returned to their Islamic enemy combatant ways in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Gitmo should be kept open until Islamic terrorism is resolved in a victory. If that means a life sentence for Gitmo inmates then so be it.

JRH 1/22/09

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Prayer Service - ISNA's Ingrid Mattson in Her Own Words


Here is an Act for America email about one of the key people in the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). That person is Ingrid Mattson the current President of ISNA and apologist for Islamic terrorist organizations among Arabs that call themselves Palestinians and Wahhabism (This is of interest).

JRH 1/21/09
************************************
ISNA's Ingrid Mattson in her own words

Act for America
Email Sent: January 20, 2009 11:41:35 AM

Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), will deliver a prayer at the National Prayer Service on January 21st. This designation has prompted many people to ask, “Who is Ingrid Mattson?”

Our friends at the
Center for Security Policy released the research brief below that reveals who Mattson is and what she believes – in her own words.

It is sufficiently problematic that ISNA, the organization of which Ingrid Mattson is president, was designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing trial (which produced guilty verdicts on 108 counts). Mattson’s words and views beg the question: When there are Muslims in America who have publicly spoken out against Jihad, against shariah law, and against ISNA, why was Ingrid Mattson chosen for this interfaith prayer service?

ACT for America
P.O. Box 6884 Virginia Beach, VA 23456
http://www.actforamerica.org/

ACT for America is an issues advocacy organization dedicated to effectively organizing and mobilizing the most powerful grassroots citizen action network in America, a grassroots network committed to informed and coordinated civic action that will lead to public policies that promote America’s national security and the defense of American democratic values against the assault of radical Islam.
We are only as strong as our supporters, and your volunteer and financial support is essential to our success. Thank you for helping us make America safer and more secure.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The Predictable Palestinian Propaganda Ploy


Leslie J. Sacks exposes Dr. Hanan Ashwari as a prevaricating Arab called Palestinian pro-Islamic terrorist apologist. Also Sacks about the incredible lack of Gerald Rivera calling Ashwari on some of the absurd inflammable statements she made about civilian Arab/Gazan casualties as if Hamas cares about civilian casualties.

JRH 1/20/09

Commutation for Ramos and Compean


One of the hugest miscarriages of justice in American history was at least partly alleviated yesterday. In President George W. Bush’s last full day of Office he commuted the sentence of unjustly convicted Border Patrol Guards Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean. Incredulously Federal Prosecutor Johnny Sutton went after Ramos and Compean for shooting fleeing drug smuggler Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila in the buttocks.

Can you imagine placing the full weight of the law on American Border Agents instead of a drug smuggler bringing drugs to be sold to Americans who in turn have a huge percentage of it ruining American lives due to bad choices?

President Bush should have issued a full pardon rather than a commutation.

JRH 1/20/09 (Hat Tip: BizzyBlog)




Monday, January 19, 2009

Biblical Morality: I’m Just Saying …



I am what homosexuals refer to as a “fundie”; i.e. a Christian Right (Bible Believing) fundamentalist. Since the Mainstream Media (MSM) has successfully demeaned Christian fundamentalists as the Christian version of Islamic terrorists, I tend to eschew that appellation.

I am extremely comfortable with being a member of the Christian Right that upholds Christian Biblical morality. I am extremely uncomfortable with the money that is behind a homosexual agenda to indoctrinate Americans that it is ok to practice this perversion.

Secular Humanism that is so pervasive in American society has watered down morality for heterosexuals so much that no one thinks twice about adultery, fornication and keeping a family together. This is such a standard procedure in America that divorce is flippant direction to do go because the morality of marriage has been diluted by the common usage of pre-marital sex. Indeed one can view this dilution on one of the largest propaganda tool America possesses – Left leaning Secular Humanist television entertainment.

Because of this I can understand the sense of hypocrisy homosexuals have against anti-homosexual heterosexuals, those of the Christian persuasion in particular. A pleased to say that divorce rates of 50% plus for Americans is staggering deception promulgated by the manipulation of statistics (check HERE and HERE). For example the common statistic you would find would be on a site like DivorceRate.com.

At DivorceRate.com you can read the oft skewed report of America’s Divorce which goes something like this:

The divorce rate in America for first marriage, vs second or third marriage
50% percent of first marriages, 67% of second and 74% of third marriages end in divorce, according to Jennifer Baker of the Forest Institute of Professional Psychology in Springfield, Missouri.”


The two links above DivorceRate.com demonstrate how the data is misconstrued.

I pray my brief justice does justice. From what I’ve read the statistics are unequal compared by year and by the total couples married. Given that criteria the divorce drops compared to the popular versions placed in the public as the absolute truth.

Here is small example of good debunking of Secular Humanist data:

A spokesperson for the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics told me that the rumor appears to have originated from a misreading of the facts. It was true, he said, if you looked at all the marriages and divorces within a single year, you'd find that there were twice as many marriages as divorces. In 1981, for example, there were 2.4 million marriages and 1.2 million divorces. At first glance, that would seem like a 50-percent divorce rate.

Virtually none of those divorces were among the people who had married during that year, however, and the statistic failed to take into account the 54 million marriages that already existed, the majority of which would not see divorce.


In the other link debunking the divorce myth in America it points out that 49% of those co-habiting (i.e. living in fornication) end up separating. This is sad for it is people willing and openly disregarding Biblical Morality. It is so common no one thinks about it.

It is also sad that those that identify themselves as Christians have the same rate of divorce rate as those that regard themselves as a secularist. Of those Christians that have comparable divorce rates to secularists, it is the Biblical Morality crowd that has higher rates than traditional mainline Churches. Christians have the same or a little higher divorce rate than atheists and agnostics.

This is where the homosexual agenda wants to lead America: a common place of acceptance of the perversion already given validation by the secular minded American Medical Association (AMA) and American Psychiatric Association (APA).

I am gratified to discover there is exists an organization called the National Psychiatric Association (NPA). It claims to be the standard among psychiatrists implying that the APA has slipped. The NPA lists homosexuality as a mental disorder and underlines for emphasis.

I do hammer on homosexuality as wrong as many Biblically based Christians do; however to bring balance it is time to also harp on sins such as adultery and co-habiting fornication. What is worse: a practicing homosexual or overt non-marital co-habitation among heterosexuals?

I have to admit I have too been de-sensitized to acts of co-habitation or adultery. I have caught myself thinking “you fool” for the adulterers and telling myself “to look the other way” concerning co-habitation.

Really though the practices are all wrong: adultery, fornication and homosexuality. Because of the normalizing of adultery and fornication in America, heterosexual secularists that find homosexuality abhorrent and Biblical Christians that find homosexuality abhorrent, dump on the now very public and very open agenda of accepting homosexuality as a normal phenomenon.

This brings me to the Americans for Truth about Homosexuality (AFTAH) article I just finished reading. This AFTAH article is praising a hotel chain for finally pulling the plug of a homosexual event to be held in one of their hotels. The homosexual event was labeled, “Obama Inauguration Pig Sex Orgy.”

Apparently AFTAH had been hammering the hotel chain to cancel the homosexual event. Evidently there was initial resistance from the hotel to cancel the “Obama Inauguration Pig Sex Orgy.” Eventually the parent company of the hotel succumbed to the pressure of AFTAH (thank God) and issued a directive for the hotel to cancel the pig sex orgy.

I don’t EVEN want to dwell on what a homosexual pig sex orgy entails. The very thought is repugnant!

The thing that provoked a little more thought about homosexuals is a written comment sent in about a pig sex orgy. Here is the quote:

I have mixed feelings over this… I know what these pig sex orgies are and they need to be held on someone’s farm or ranch deep in the woods. I am a gay man and find them pretty disgusting! It seems this event was planned to shock the fundies [Christian fundamentalists] and add legitimacy to their hedonist cause. I don’t care what anyone does sexually but a little discretion would be called for.

Most people only get their news about gays from this type of reporting. Unfortunately, the reporting is true. It is time for all members of the gay community to take a look at themselves and how they portray themselves.

by: paulko @ Sat Jan 17, 2009 at 07:39:48 AM CST


You see there are heterosexuals that go to sex clubs, prostitutes and striptease joints. Those heterosexual practices are as hedonistic as the homosexual pig sex orgy.

Straight up friends: DO NOT retreat from repudiating the homosexual agenda; however let us get some gumption and repudiate heterosexual perversions as well.

JRH 1/19/09


Hamas and Victory Propaganda



Soon after Hamas agreed to a truce with Israel their propaganda machine went into action spreading al-Taqiyya. Hamas declared a monumental victory over Israel in their little war.

I guess having your infrastructure decimated and your leadership killed or captured is a definition of victory. I guess having the land which you are supposed to administrate occupied by a kick-but army is a victory.

NOT!

Hamas agreed to have Egypt to intercede with Israel for a cease-fire. That way the lying murdering Islamic terrorists can say they were talked into a truce by their friends Egypt.

Hot Air has written a post about the dysfunctional propaganda emanating from Hamas.

JRH 1/19/09



Sunday, January 18, 2009

Ellison is an Example of Islamic Infiltration

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) is the first overt Mohammedan elected to the House of Representatives.

Recently Ellison performed the Mohammedan duty of the hajj to Mecca – December 2008 I believe. The thing is the travelling expenses for the hajj were supplied by Murderous Islamic anti-American terrorists.

A
recent post of mine is about Islamic/Mohammedan infiltration in American government by political Islam that is designed to hide the nature of Islamic Supremacism and to hide the ugly repression that is Mohammedanism.

It is time to wake up to the goals of Islam in regard to Liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the United States of America.


Hat tip: NoDhimmiJimmi.

BBC: Hamas announces ceasefire in Gaza


Hamas has agreed to a cease-fire with Israel despite saying they would stop firing rockets until the IDF has left Gaza.

Since Hamas’ unrepentant goal is the destruction of Israel, I suspect Hamas will either break the truce or to rearm to pathetically exploit Israeli citizens and a superior Israeli military.

Oh yes, if you proceed to read the BBC news article you will notice the Leftist rag calls Hamas a “Palestinian militant group” instead of the truth. That truth is Hamas is a Theo-Political Islamofascist hateful anti-Semitic Murdering Terrorist organization.

JRH 1/18/09 (Hat tip: PlanetData)

Saturday, January 17, 2009

The Virus of the Islamic Fifth Column


Once upon a time in America there was a Fifth Column of Soviet inspired Communists that had infiltrated the U.S. government. That was a scary thing considering the old Soviet Union wanted to dominate the world with its Soviet Empire under the illusion the “proletarian” class would shake off some kind of false Capitalist bondage that exploited working class people by imposing democratic principles, civil rights and government for the people (as opposed to people for the government).

Another Fifth Column is slowly emerging in the United States with an unlikely comrade in the American Left. I say unlikely because the American Left is propping up Political Islam in America as European governments already have accomplished.

European Islam has proven every bit as violent as Middle Eastern Islam. Indeed, Islam in Europe has demanded and in many cases succeeded to have the tyranny of Sharia Law to supersede the rule of law based on Western principles in European governments.

If this type of Islamic Fifth Column continues to grow in America under the delusion of the freedom of religion, there will be NO freedom in America; particularly there will be NO freedom of religion. Sharia Law is evil.

Act for America has sent out an email alert that exposes how Islamic sympathizers and Muslims have even warped military strategy in America’s military schools to view Islamic murdering terrorists as Hamas to be a victimized “misunderstood” group of Muslims.

THIS IS WHAT IS BEING TAUGHT IN AMERICA’S WAR COLLEGE!

Below is Act for America’s email which is a must read. Then go on to read Patrick Poole’s article describing on form of Islamic interpenetration into Western ideology.

JRH 1/17/09
*********************************



    Strategic collapse at the Army War College

    Act for America
    Email Sent: January 16, 2009


    Below you will find an excellent piece by our friend Patrick Poole which addresses a fundamental problem we repeatedly point out – that far too many in our government are either ignorant of, in denial of, or disingenuous about the underlying threat doctrine that drives Islamic terrorism worldwide.


    This sentence is particularly alarming:

    “Two weeks ago, Ricks reported on a new publication by Army War College research professor Sherifa Zuhur on Hamas and Israel that informs readers that Hamas has been misunderstood due to the misreporting by ‘Israeli and Western sources that villainize the group.’”



    So, according to Zuhur, the Hamas organization that is caught on video brainwashing children to hate Israel and kill Jews, training children to be terrorists, and using children as human shields, is not really so bad, but has been “misunderstood” because of reporting that “villianizes” the organization.


    Remarkable.


    As we have noted many times before, one reason it is essential that we build a formidable grassroots citizen action network is that we must have the “bottom up” strength to successfully push for government policies that truly understand the nature of the threat we face and take the necessary actions to combat it.


    We know there are many people throughout the government who share our concerns about political correctness run amok. But when the Army War College publishes a report with absurd claims like Zuhur’s, it should be eminently clear to us that the voices of political correctness are overpowering the voices of sanity and reason.


    One action you can take today, if you haven’t already done so, is to
    sign our petition calling for a UN investigation of Hamas.


    ACT for America
    P.O. Box 6884
    Virginia Beach, VA 23456

    http://www.actforamerica.org/

Blarney: A Ten Day Israel/Hamas Cease-Fire


Apparently a unilateral cease-fire vote is about to place with the Israel Security Council for a ten day truce with Hamas.

The word is “unilateral” because as usual the concerned Arab States and the West want Israel to cease fire without any reciprocal commitment from Hamas.

Hamas vows to keep shooting missiles as long as the Israel Defense Forces are in Gaza as if Hamas did not shoot missiles before the IDF was used to punish Hamas for shooting at Israeli civilian targets.

I also read that Foreign Minister (and current head of Kadima) Tzipi Livni said Israel would resume military activities if Hamas continues missile attacks.

I thus sense if the Israel Security Council signs a unilateral cease-fire, it will be either a worthless scrap of paper in which Hamas will shoot more rockets or Hamas will use ten days to re-arm to continue its agenda of murder and terror to wipe Israel off the planet.

I say if Israel signs a cease-fire as forced upon them by a variety Western Governments (and as brokered by the USA and/or Egypt) any sign of re-arming or missile activity should be publicly hailed for Israel to eradicate Hamas from Gaza.

Of course the useless supposed organization of world peace – the U.N. – is outraged that Israel keeps shelling their enemies who are not signing into the cease-fire themselves.

Then the AP typically inserts a Gazan victimization story of an IDF shell landing in their kitchen and the poor Gazans (who incidentally are nearly 100% behind Hamas terrorism) are trapped in their homes.

If this was Ireland instead of the Middle East, the word “
blarney” comes to mind.

JRH 1/17/09