John R. Houk
© December 24, 2008
Remember the Mohammedans that were caught in a sting operation associated with the desire to wreak carnage and death on the soldiers and personnel of Fort Dix?
A Jury found these foreign born Islamic Jihadists guilty of conspiring to do acts of terrorism. The Prosecutors wanted an attempted murder as well however the Jury acquitted the Mohammedans of that charge.
Here is where the American Muslim Union (AMU) and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) enter the picture. These Muslim-American organizations claim to represent the rights of the “moderate” Muslim in America. Yet shortly after the verdict AMU and CAIR protested the verdict against the foreign born Mohammedans bent on emulating their heroes of al-Qaeda.
Hello Americans! If a Mohammedan practices peace (as majorities of that religion indeed do) that Mohammedan is NOT following the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna etc.
Please do not hate the practitioners of Islam; however despise the theology that the practitioners believe is peaceful when in fact Islam/Mohammedanism is a theo-political death cult if one follows the examples of its founder Mohammed.
Mohamad Younes (President AMU) tries to draw propagandized sympathy for the perpetrators by saying,
Eye On The World blog writes this about Younes’ propaganda:
My fellow Americans here is a successful example of the Authorities doing something to stop terrorism by Mohammedans before it happens.
Hats off to the Jury that was able to see through any propaganda to decipher the real intent of the plan to kill Americans.
JRH 12/24/08
*************************************
US: Muslims object to terror plot verdict
Adnkronos International
December 23, 2008
Camden, 23 Dec. (AKI) - Muslim leaders have objected to a US court decision to convict five Muslims for plotting a terror attack on an American military base at Fort Dix in the state of New Jersey. After an eight-week trial, a jury on Monday ruled that three ethnic-Albanian brothers, Shain, Dritan and Eljvir Duka, and two others - Turkish-born Serdar Tatar and Mohammed Shnewer from Jordan - were found guilty of planning an attack on the base in a bid to kill as many American soldiers as possible.
The jury, however, acquitted the group of charges of attempted murder.
Mohamad Younes, president of the American Muslim Union, questioned the jury's decision.
"I don't think they actually mean to do anything," he said. "I think they were acting stupid, like they thought the whole thing was a joke."
Jim Sues, executive director of the New Jersey chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, attended five days of testimony during the trial.
"Many people in the Muslim community will see this as a case of entrapment," he told local media.
The five foreign-born residents lived in the northeastern cities of Cherry Hill in New Jersey and Philadelphia in the state of Pennsylvania. They were arrested in May 2007 after the group was infiltrated by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents.
The prosecutors described their activities as an attempt to wage Islamist holy war against America, inspired by Al-Qaeda.
Defence lawyers had argued that the five were just bragging about their plans and also challenged the credibility of the government informants.
One Egyptian-born informant was paid 230,000 dollars by the FBI for his undercover work, said the defence lawyers. They also said he was on probation for bank fraud.
Defence lawyers also claimed that the men were coaxed by the government informants into making controversial and incendiary remarks which were recorded.
However, police discovered propaganda material, maps, hundreds of secretly taped conversations and video material.
Dritan and Shain Duka were also found guilty of possessing weapons to be used in the planned attack that was never executed.
Sentencing has been set for April 2009 and acting US Attorney Ralph Marra said prosecutors will demand a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Defence lawyers said they would consider an appeal after hearing the sentence.
_______________________________
Representatives of ‘Moderate’ Muslims Decry Fort Dix Verdict
John R. Houk
© December 24, 2008
__________________
US: Muslims object to terror plot verdict
© GMC Group Ð all rights reserved Ð TVA number 01145141006
AKI - Adnkronos International, registered at the Rome Court 7th April 2003, registration number 156. Director: Giuseppe Marra
© December 24, 2008
Remember the Mohammedans that were caught in a sting operation associated with the desire to wreak carnage and death on the soldiers and personnel of Fort Dix?
A Jury found these foreign born Islamic Jihadists guilty of conspiring to do acts of terrorism. The Prosecutors wanted an attempted murder as well however the Jury acquitted the Mohammedans of that charge.
Here is where the American Muslim Union (AMU) and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) enter the picture. These Muslim-American organizations claim to represent the rights of the “moderate” Muslim in America. Yet shortly after the verdict AMU and CAIR protested the verdict against the foreign born Mohammedans bent on emulating their heroes of al-Qaeda.
Hello Americans! If a Mohammedan practices peace (as majorities of that religion indeed do) that Mohammedan is NOT following the Quran, the Hadith, and the Sunna etc.
Please do not hate the practitioners of Islam; however despise the theology that the practitioners believe is peaceful when in fact Islam/Mohammedanism is a theo-political death cult if one follows the examples of its founder Mohammed.
Mohamad Younes (President AMU) tries to draw propagandized sympathy for the perpetrators by saying,
"I don't think they actually mean to do anything," he said. "I think they were acting stupid, like they thought the whole thing was a joke."
Eye On The World blog writes this about Younes’ propaganda:
Really? They were trying to buy, illegally, AK-47s, M-16s, RPG launchers and other weapons from an FBI informant, were secretly training to use these weapons, coincidentally shouting "Allahu Akbar" firing these weapons, and planning "to kill as many American soldiers as possible". The only thing stupid about their actions was videotaping their activities thus proving the the [sic] investigators with proof of their intentions.
My fellow Americans here is a successful example of the Authorities doing something to stop terrorism by Mohammedans before it happens.
Hats off to the Jury that was able to see through any propaganda to decipher the real intent of the plan to kill Americans.
JRH 12/24/08
*************************************
US: Muslims object to terror plot verdict
Adnkronos International
December 23, 2008
Camden, 23 Dec. (AKI) - Muslim leaders have objected to a US court decision to convict five Muslims for plotting a terror attack on an American military base at Fort Dix in the state of New Jersey. After an eight-week trial, a jury on Monday ruled that three ethnic-Albanian brothers, Shain, Dritan and Eljvir Duka, and two others - Turkish-born Serdar Tatar and Mohammed Shnewer from Jordan - were found guilty of planning an attack on the base in a bid to kill as many American soldiers as possible.
The jury, however, acquitted the group of charges of attempted murder.
Mohamad Younes, president of the American Muslim Union, questioned the jury's decision.
"I don't think they actually mean to do anything," he said. "I think they were acting stupid, like they thought the whole thing was a joke."
Jim Sues, executive director of the New Jersey chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, attended five days of testimony during the trial.
"Many people in the Muslim community will see this as a case of entrapment," he told local media.
The five foreign-born residents lived in the northeastern cities of Cherry Hill in New Jersey and Philadelphia in the state of Pennsylvania. They were arrested in May 2007 after the group was infiltrated by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents.
The prosecutors described their activities as an attempt to wage Islamist holy war against America, inspired by Al-Qaeda.
Defence lawyers had argued that the five were just bragging about their plans and also challenged the credibility of the government informants.
One Egyptian-born informant was paid 230,000 dollars by the FBI for his undercover work, said the defence lawyers. They also said he was on probation for bank fraud.
Defence lawyers also claimed that the men were coaxed by the government informants into making controversial and incendiary remarks which were recorded.
However, police discovered propaganda material, maps, hundreds of secretly taped conversations and video material.
Dritan and Shain Duka were also found guilty of possessing weapons to be used in the planned attack that was never executed.
Sentencing has been set for April 2009 and acting US Attorney Ralph Marra said prosecutors will demand a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Defence lawyers said they would consider an appeal after hearing the sentence.
_______________________________
Representatives of ‘Moderate’ Muslims Decry Fort Dix Verdict
John R. Houk
© December 24, 2008
__________________
US: Muslims object to terror plot verdict
© GMC Group Ð all rights reserved Ð TVA number 01145141006
AKI - Adnkronos International, registered at the Rome Court 7th April 2003, registration number 156. Director: Giuseppe Marra
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment