I am on Act For America’s email list in which I gratefully receive news pertaining to the exposé of Islamist, Jihadist and sometimes mere Islamic agendas that are anti-American (ergo anti-Western).
In an August 18 email Act For America writes about the United Nations Human Rights Council mandating globally that ANY criticism about Islam’s Sharia Law and fatwas will not be tolerated.
Of Course the United Nations Human Rights Council is a joke. Most of the member nations are Islamic or dictatorial nations in which human rights violations are a way of life. This is another reason America should first of all try to form a world body that represents democratic interests and principles and abandon the U.N. to its Leftist and/or Islamic designs. The new democratic world body could form an economic, civil rights and military set of international rules based on democracy and freedom to counter the obvious exploitation that nations like Russia and China might take advantage of on a U.N. Security Council minus the U.S.A.
(Act For America attributes the Leslie J. Sacks blog as the source for the U.N. story.)
But that is another story and post.
The Act For America email goes on to post a Times Online (UK) article by Mick Hume that decries publishing house Random House abandoning the publication of a book entitled “The Jewel of Medina” by Sherry Jones. Evidently the book portrays Mohammed’s child wife Aisha as a willing sexual pedophilic partner who enjoys the soft porn bliss relationship with the prophet of Allah.
Random House claims the book was abandoned because of the notification of possible terrorist focus on Random House and its employees. Thus Islamofascist (one might even say because of the UNHRC Islamic) terrorism has effectively squashed Freedom of Speech in America.
Critics of Random House’s lack of a Liberty back bone claim that an Associate Professor from the University of Texas at Austin (Denise A. Spellberg) contacted Islamists about the imminent publication which shortly followed the threatening posture Random House reported. She denies the contact; however she very publicly decries the book manuscript is soft porn and therefore would be offensive to Muslims.
Indeed one of my favorite anti-Islamist scholars Robert Spencer decries the manuscript is more fiction than non-fiction in accuracy; however it is a novel (a bad novel but still a novel). Spencer agrees with Professor Spellberg’s summation of the inaccuracies in the book; however Spencer also decries Random House for allowing Muslim intimidation to hamper First Amendment rights of Free Speech in America.
The potential Islamic outrage and the willingness of Western publishing houses to acquiesce to Muslim demands smacks of dhimmitude. The publishing houses do not fear reprisals for publishing anti-Christian novels such as the Da Vinci Code nor does the UNHRC find it intolerable that nations like Russia and China for human rights violations. In China’s case Christians are specifically targeted that are not registered by the government. Nor does the UNHRC find intolerable Muslim nations (and aspiring nations such as Palestine) continuously allow publication and video media that portrays Christians and Jews as the evolved from apes and pigs.
I am here to tell you the Islamic outrage concerning is based on Islamic Supremacism which views insulting other faiths or democratic values as NOT insulting incitement. And America and the West have become so ingrained in Politically Correct thinking we are willing to absorb the Islamic accusation of racism and Islamic boohoo of “I am a victim.”
It is time to wake-up and reassert Western (and in my case – Christian) values even if intolerant Mohammedans are offended.
JRH 8/19/08
*****************************
A festival of groveling to terrorists
Mick Hume
Act For America Intro
Email Sent: August 18, 2008
Article Date: August 12, 2008
Times Online
According to the Leslie Sacks blogspot, “The Human Rights Council at the United Nations has now banned any criticism regarding Sharia Law and human rights in the Islamic World. According to President Doru Romulus Costea – and following the efforts of delegates from Egypt, Pakistan and Iran – the Council will no longer tolerate criticism of either Sharia or specific fatwas in the name of human rights.”
Earlier this year, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) called for aggressive, worldwide legal actions to stop the “defamation” of Islam.
Muslim leaders throughout the world routinely condemn any public critique or criticism of Islam or Mohammed.
And who could forget the Muslim riots after the Danish publication of the satirical cartoons of Mohammed?
This is all one more front in the cultural jihad being waged against the West and the values of the West. And every time we acquiesce to it or grovel before it we empower it. Just as appeasing Hitler failed, so appeasement of militant Islamists will fail. We cannot – we must not – surrender our cherished rights, such as the right of free speech, in the face of Islamist intimidation.
Act For America
Read Mick Hume's article HERE.
In an August 18 email Act For America writes about the United Nations Human Rights Council mandating globally that ANY criticism about Islam’s Sharia Law and fatwas will not be tolerated.
Of Course the United Nations Human Rights Council is a joke. Most of the member nations are Islamic or dictatorial nations in which human rights violations are a way of life. This is another reason America should first of all try to form a world body that represents democratic interests and principles and abandon the U.N. to its Leftist and/or Islamic designs. The new democratic world body could form an economic, civil rights and military set of international rules based on democracy and freedom to counter the obvious exploitation that nations like Russia and China might take advantage of on a U.N. Security Council minus the U.S.A.
(Act For America attributes the Leslie J. Sacks blog as the source for the U.N. story.)
But that is another story and post.
The Act For America email goes on to post a Times Online (UK) article by Mick Hume that decries publishing house Random House abandoning the publication of a book entitled “The Jewel of Medina” by Sherry Jones. Evidently the book portrays Mohammed’s child wife Aisha as a willing sexual pedophilic partner who enjoys the soft porn bliss relationship with the prophet of Allah.
Random House claims the book was abandoned because of the notification of possible terrorist focus on Random House and its employees. Thus Islamofascist (one might even say because of the UNHRC Islamic) terrorism has effectively squashed Freedom of Speech in America.
Critics of Random House’s lack of a Liberty back bone claim that an Associate Professor from the University of Texas at Austin (Denise A. Spellberg) contacted Islamists about the imminent publication which shortly followed the threatening posture Random House reported. She denies the contact; however she very publicly decries the book manuscript is soft porn and therefore would be offensive to Muslims.
Indeed one of my favorite anti-Islamist scholars Robert Spencer decries the manuscript is more fiction than non-fiction in accuracy; however it is a novel (a bad novel but still a novel). Spencer agrees with Professor Spellberg’s summation of the inaccuracies in the book; however Spencer also decries Random House for allowing Muslim intimidation to hamper First Amendment rights of Free Speech in America.
The potential Islamic outrage and the willingness of Western publishing houses to acquiesce to Muslim demands smacks of dhimmitude. The publishing houses do not fear reprisals for publishing anti-Christian novels such as the Da Vinci Code nor does the UNHRC find it intolerable that nations like Russia and China for human rights violations. In China’s case Christians are specifically targeted that are not registered by the government. Nor does the UNHRC find intolerable Muslim nations (and aspiring nations such as Palestine) continuously allow publication and video media that portrays Christians and Jews as the evolved from apes and pigs.
I am here to tell you the Islamic outrage concerning is based on Islamic Supremacism which views insulting other faiths or democratic values as NOT insulting incitement. And America and the West have become so ingrained in Politically Correct thinking we are willing to absorb the Islamic accusation of racism and Islamic boohoo of “I am a victim.”
It is time to wake-up and reassert Western (and in my case – Christian) values even if intolerant Mohammedans are offended.
JRH 8/19/08
*****************************
A festival of groveling to terrorists
Mick Hume
Act For America Intro
Email Sent: August 18, 2008
Article Date: August 12, 2008
Times Online
According to the Leslie Sacks blogspot, “The Human Rights Council at the United Nations has now banned any criticism regarding Sharia Law and human rights in the Islamic World. According to President Doru Romulus Costea – and following the efforts of delegates from Egypt, Pakistan and Iran – the Council will no longer tolerate criticism of either Sharia or specific fatwas in the name of human rights.”
Earlier this year, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) called for aggressive, worldwide legal actions to stop the “defamation” of Islam.
Muslim leaders throughout the world routinely condemn any public critique or criticism of Islam or Mohammed.
And who could forget the Muslim riots after the Danish publication of the satirical cartoons of Mohammed?
This is all one more front in the cultural jihad being waged against the West and the values of the West. And every time we acquiesce to it or grovel before it we empower it. Just as appeasing Hitler failed, so appeasement of militant Islamists will fail. We cannot – we must not – surrender our cherished rights, such as the right of free speech, in the face of Islamist intimidation.
Act For America
Read Mick Hume's article HERE.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment