When many of the legitimate news sites (though not MSM) inquired to Google, they were told their news feeds were promoting hate speech and so they have been deleted.
Here are a few examples of Google cited as hate speech columns:
http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/peck/05102006.htm
Have any of you noticed over the past few years that page after page in your daily newspapers is filled with the latest dysfunctional happenings caused by - or as a result of - the seemingly maniacal Muslim world? Honestly, I cannot open a paper or turn on the television without seeing mobs of Muslim savages celebrating in front of burning embassies, a school, a restaurant or those stupid tires they seem to think are so impressive to burn . And, don't you just love those scenes of men in black ski masks, racing through the streets, shooting guns in the air or standing behind some terrified captive getting ready to be-head him or her?
Lord, did we have a life before the Taliban? I wonder. Is this an improvement from a few of years ago when we saw Western dignitaries sitting in yucky caves in Afghanistan, wearing Armani suits and Bally shoes; at the table sitting with them, a dirty rag-towel wearing ‘War Lords ' (tell me, isn't that an 7th century concept ?), eating road kill for din-din and making plans to stop the Al Qaeda. Come to think of it, before 9/11, we never heard of words like Al Qaeda, Taliban, Jihad, Homeland Security or any other of the new vocabulary that they've taught us.
************
http://www.newmediajournal.us/staff/stock/05082006.htm
There are people in America who still do not realize that our country is at war. This is astounding considering all of the threats that Islamic terrorists and leaders have been issuing lately. These unenlightened folks consider President Bush the enemy, so Bush is actually fighting a war on two fronts. One is with Islam, the real enemy, and the other is with American leftists who are more concerned about regaining their power than the safety of the country. Sometimes it’s difficult to sort out which is more dangerous.
**************
http://www.newmediajournal.us/guest/imani/04222006.htm
“In science it often happens that scientists say, you know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken, and then they actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion”. - Carl Sagan
As has been said, if you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. Islam in general, forbids lying. The Quran says, "Truly Allah guides not one who transgresses and lies." Surah 40:28. In the Hadith, Mohammed was also quoted as saying, "Be honest because honesty leads to goodness, and goodness leads to Paradise. Beware of falsehood because it leads to immorality, and immorality leads to Hell." However, this has not been the case in Islam. Islam is based on big lies and contradictions.
The biggest scam in Islam, especially Shi’a Islam is perhaps the notion of “Taqqiyeh”, an immoral tactic to lie for a good cause and later retract your words. (The belief that the end justifies the means) Islam is all about schemes, war and violence.
Prophet Mohammed was an extremely violent man, a man of war. Historically, Jesus set the example for love, as did Moses. The opposite is true of Prophet Muhammad. That is why we see so many suicide bombers in our era. They simply are following what the prophet of Islam had planned for them. Islam rewards those who become martyrs with 72 virgins. So sex is what the Arab Muslim murderers die for. It is all about sex. This must tell us a lot about the prophet’s own appetite for sex. He did not spare anyone; even 9 year old girls were not immune to his sexual wrath. Worshiping a sex-maniac and a child molester? I think NOT.
Though some of these articles may offend Mohammedans, it is not reported as malice. It is the reporting of fact from Mohammedan documents and Mohammedan acts. Is that hate speech or informed opinion?
Legitimate Conservative bloggers and journalists have been placed on this restriction.
Some names such as Michelle Malkin, The Jawa Report and MichNews.com are a few others.
The Search engine giant is telling America if you are Conservative and recognize the dysfunction of Mohammenanism you cannot be a part of their newsfeed. Google is an independent corporation and it is their right to prohibit what is on their operated sites, however it demonstrates a lack of credibility to promote a Liberal agenda and dispose Conservative opinion. If Google would come out and overty proclaim that is a Liberal organization that politically supports the Democratic Party agenda that would be a different matter.
The fact is a significant amount of Googles upper level staff indeed financially support the Democratic Party (as is their right), however to portray themselves as a balanced giant in the market place and prohibit a Conservative view on their news feed is the opposite of their motto: "Don't be evil." If Google definition of "evil" Conservative politics and Christian free speech, then I guess they are within their bounds. If their definition of "evil" is like the dicitionary:
NOUN:
1. The quality of being morally bad or wrong; wickedness.
2. That which causes harm, misfortune, or destruction: a leader's power to do both good and evil.
3. An evil force, power, or personification.
4. Something that is a cause or source of suffering, injury, or destruction: the social evils of poverty and injustice.
Then Google is way off base. Conservatives and Christians consider Liberals and Mohammedans as evil. Google in marketing to both should be fair and balanced in allowing both critiques from both camps on their news feed.
There are many sources of this Google expostion, the news feed I found concerning this WorldNetDaily. Go HERE to read their article on this information.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment