As a Conservative viewing gloom and doom at 8:30 PM CT for the Republican Party, I am enheartened to view an emerging Right electorate in the Land of Israel. The treacherous political party toward Judaism and Eretz Israel – Kadima – is beginning to collapse with prominent Israeli politicians moving toward Netanyahu’s Likud party and even some politicians that had left Likud returning to the traditional slanted right political party.
Now this is excellent because Likud represents NOT giving the Holy City of Christians and Jews – Jerusalem – to Mohammedan Arabs who are intent on calling themselves Palestinians. Likud will satisfy Observant and Zionist Jews as well as the Conservative Christians in America who have been labeled as Christian Zionists.
Slanted Left Israelis, EU leaders, Slanted Left American leaders and curiously the Bush Administration and many GOP members of Congress believe dividing Jerusalem and returning Israel to a pre-1967 border will bring peace to the Middle East. It is my stand and many Zionists that this kind of give-away will embolden Islamic terrorists and rogue nations to accomplish their dream of exterminating Jews from their Biblical land in the name of Allah.
The only real electoral question for Israel is can a Likud coalition assume the Israeli government before caretaker Prime Minister succeeds in giving away the heart of Israel?
Leslie J. Sacks has found a statistical report from CBS2Chicago.com relating Chicago murders to American soldier deaths in Iraq.
Sacks utilizes the statistics to illustrate some political satire at the expense of cut-n-run Barack Hussein Obama and his fellow cut-n-war defeatist Dems.
The video compares (roughly) the American Constitution with Constitutions of various nations in the Middle East dominated by Islam/Mohammedanism. The essence that the video portrays is these Middle Eastern Constitutions make Islamic law the supreme guide post for all laws. This means non-Muslim citizens are not afforded the same rights as Muslims and even Muslims are subject to extreme penalties for breaking Islamic law (e.g. converting from Islam to Christianity (or any other religion or atheism is a capital crime leading to a death sentence).
I am not going to call Barack Hussein Obama a Muslim for I truly do not believe he is one. I believe BHO is a Christian only for politics and even that is an association with what is known as progressive Christianity. “Progressive” the catch word for center/left to outright Marxists who pick and choose matters of Christian faith that agrees with a Secular Humanist ideology and toss out the Christian faith that disagrees with Secular Humanism. Thus “progressive” Christians support homosexual lifestyles, adulterous lifestyles, a socialistic approach for solving the problems of poverty, abortion (infanticide) and anything else that may contradict the values of Biblical Christianity.
That being said BHO has publicly said he supports America’s traditional friendship with Israel; however some of his buddies are (were) overt supporters of the murdering terrorists that call themselves Palestinian Arabs.
That being said BHO’s plan for global peace is to talk to American enemies (i.e. Iran, Syria, North Korea and potentially Stateless Islamic terrorists) without pre-conditions. That is a set-up for a political and perhaps security damning sucker punch.
Dear God in Heaven! Do NOT vote for Barack Hussein Obama on November 4th. If you already have, pray more McCain voters turn out to override your early voting or absentee ballot that was cast in ignorance.
“Those who make war against the United States have chosen their own destruction. Victory against terrorism will not take place in a single battle, but in a series of decisive actions against terrorist organizations and those who harbor and support them.”
The Dems have been trying to sell voters that Afghanistan and chasing bin Laden is the only thing America should be acting against global terrorism. The thing that Bush understood in 2001 (yet even his memory slowly faded) is that al Qaeda is not the only Islamofascist organization intent on harming America. In addition multiple Middle Eastern nations (including the Palestine Authority) harbor(ed) Islamic terrorists.
When the Dems (and some Republicans) realized that going after terrorists wherever harbored could mean not only the perpetrator of 9/11 in the hinterland of Afghanistan and Pakistan. It would mean oil rich Iraq, Libya, Iran and politically sensitive Syria, Lebanon and the Palestine Authority. This also includes the Mohammedan oil billionaires of Saudi Arabia and the oil rich Emirates of the Saudi Peninsula who have financed Islamic terrorists. Then there are also militarily powerful nations such as Egypt and Pakistan that harbor or tolerate Islamic terrorists and sympathizers.
If Barack Hussein Obama wins the November 4th election, it will please so-called Palestinian Arabs who actually sent money to the Obama campaign and have publicly relished the idea that the Republican are favored to loose to BHO.
I suggest John Houk read either the constitution or possibly the Wikipedia definition of natural born citizen. This should make it more clear to him that BHO is clearly not a natural born citizen, unless BHO's October surprise is that he has been sidestepping this issue just to keep a conspiracy theory going, and magically he will pull out a birth certificate that is not a forgery at the last minute.
There is a slight hint of hostility from Fred concerning my thoughts on how Judge Surrick should have handle a ruling by a law suit from Philip Berg questioning Barack Hussein Obama’s status as a natural born citizen of America. If BHO was ruled to be a Naturalized citizen of America, he would be ineligible to run for the Office of President.
Fred’s hint of anger was because I thought because BHO had a natural born parent, i.e. his mother; I thought he would be eligible.
For clarity’s sake I would love Barack Hussain Obama to be ruled ineligible. I am DEFINITELY NOT in his camp for him to be elected the most Leftist/Marxist President America has ever seen. On the other hand making something up in the law that may not be there is not a fair action. I mean that is the very thing Leftists do with a Slanted Left activist judiciary – make up laws creation ex nihilo.
If indeed BHO can be shown to a Naturalized citizen rather than a Natural Born Citizen without forcing a round law into a square law, then I all for it.
Anyway I took Fred’s advice and look at Wikipedia and a website that interprets constitutional law.
I found the Wikipedia explanation to be informative yet leaving the reader to draw their conclusions rather than expressly defining a situation that might apply to Barack Hussein Obama.
Posts
