skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Ann Coulter hits the nail on the head. The Clinton Administration could have gotten bin Laden, however the stupidity of Liberal "Political Correctness" and the cowardice blamed on international red tape led to 9/11.When it is obvious a foreign enemy can be apprehended or terminated in the act of apprehension, it is pure ineptitude to be concerned to be concerned about courting the feelings of nations in which the Mohammedans hate your very souls.Coulter goes into greater detail than "The Path to 9/11." I am still amazed that ABC produced and aired a movie in which the Clintonoids tried real hard to not have broadcast. Good for ABC.
UNBELIEVABLE! Lt. James Gordon Klingenschmitt was convicted for praying in the Name of Jesus.
Tell me how much sense this makes. Klingenschmitt is forbidden to pray in "Jesus' Name" in a Navy Uniform, while the federal government builds a mosque for Mohammedans to pray at Quantico. Do you think those Mohammedan Quantico prayers do not include the Mohammedan statement of faith: "Allah is Great and Mohammed is his prophet."
Friends Christian's in the military pray "in the Name of Jesus."
This absolutely breaks the true nature of the First Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
By accepting Mohammedan prayer and prohibiting Christian prayer is the federal establishment of religion. This is wrong! This is Unconstitutional! This is anti-Christian!
President Ahmadinejad of Iran is to be in New York to soap box Iran’s psycho point of view.
ALL people who understand the nature of evil that Ahmadinejad is possessed, should embark to New York to demonstrate in the tens of thousands against this psycho. Let the true spirit of America come forth and show we know evil when it is present. If you live in the Northeastern U.S. demonstrate that Ahmadinejad's agenda is wicked by shouting him down.
I remember seeing the Palestinians dancing and celebrating in the streets right after the Twin Towers were attacked. There are some things Americans need to remember.
Texans seeking liberty from a despotic Mexico initiated a Revolution. Santa Ana came to put down the Texas Revolt with brutality if necessary. The Alamo became a distraction to Santa Ana but helped Sam Houston gather his Texas forces.
Santa Ana massacred all the Texans in the Alamo. Those that survived were executed. The rally call by the Texans that defeated and captured Santa Ana was - REMEMBER THE ALAMO!
My fellow Americans - REMEMBER 9/11!
Natan Sharansky wrote a book that was very influential on neocons and President Bush. The is entitled "The Case For Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror." The theme of the book is that if democracy is brought to an authoritarian nation, then the instruments of liberty and freedom follow. The book focused on the fall of the USSR and the then emerging democratic institutions arising in Russia.Sharansky's thoughts became the neocon bull horn for nation building to make the world a safer place. At the time I totally agreed with that agenda. I have come to realize that Sharansky's principles for adding democratic principles to reform a despotic nation is culture specific. It works where Christianity was the bedrock foundation for ethics and morality.It will be difficult to realize in a Mohammedan culture in which violence and deception is the inherent creed against non-Mohammedans.With this in mind it is important to understand the hugest believer in democratic transformation is also the same person calling for the accountability rogue nations utilizing terrorists to carry out globally dangerous foreign policy agendas. Sharansky points to Iran and the potential of the nuclear suit case by proxy in the West. If Iran uses Hezbollah by proxy with impunity, what will stop Iran from using terrorists by proxy to carry out nuke explosions in Western cities or Israel?
Here is a report from ICEJ:Terror attack on US Embassy in Damascus foiled
A large-scale terror attack on the US Embassy in the Syrian capitol of Damascus was thwarted Tuesday morning after gunmen engaged Syrian security personnel in deadly firefight. The terrorists, according reports, drove two explosives-laden cars to the area of the embassy, exited the vehicles and opened fire with machine guns and hand grenades. The Syrian guards then returned fire, killing three of the attackers and detonating one of the vehicles. Witnesses reported that a Syrian security officer was killed in the fighting while a worker at the embassy reported that there were no US casualties in the attack. The US turned up its criticism of Syria during the Israeli conflict in July and August with Lebanese-based Hizb'Allah guerrillas, who are supported by Syria and Iran. Along with Iran, Iraq and North Korea - Syria comprises what US President George W Bush has dubbed the "Axis of Evil." Syria, accused by Washington of helping insurgents in Iraq and backing Hizb'Allah and Hamas, blames the rise of terrorism in the region on US policies in the Middle East.
Assad is no dummy. The crafty Syrian President is fully aware that a successful terrorist attack this close to a 9/11 Memorian would give the Bush Administration the leverage to attack and blame him.This is by NO means a display of Syrian aid to help America in the Middle East. It was an act of self-preservation to avoid a probable combined American/Israeli reprisal.
Palestinian terrorists are showing signs of executing acts of terrorism against the Egyptian government.
When terrorists turn openly against strong military Mohammedan nations such as Egypt, then the Middle Eastern outlook toward the terrorists may change. One of two things might develop: 1. Despotic yet powerful nations like Egypt might begin to use their resources to harshly track down terrorists; 2. public outcry against a military crackdown might begin a domino effect toppling of the despotic regimes like Egypt.
Egypt is world renowned for it utilization of torture to crack down on dissent. It is not loud music and sleep deprivation. It is actual torture in the use of physical pain and maiming in which results are forthcoming or death or both.
If radical Mohammedan terrorists make an enemy of the likes of Egypt, brutality will be countered by brutality.
There is always the danger of the common people willing to radicalize and topple Egypt as well. As long as Mubarak has absolute loyalty of his military, that could lead to huge brutality toward a popular uprising. If the Egyptian military grows weary of brutalizing their population, then Mubarak might be out of a job. That would mean a Sunni version of radical Mohammedanism would emerge similar to the radical Shi'ites of Iran.
Mubarak’s next step will be interesting.