Elections and Judicial Activism

As long as Congress allows no checks or balances to the ever growing power of America’s Judicial System (not just the Supreme Court), elected Executive Branch Presidents may shape the rule of law and social rights of years to come.

Notably the Federal Bench has been dominated by Left Wing ignore the Constitution and the will of the people to make up their own extra-Constitutional Rule of Law that is less based on the Constitution and more on a Secular Humanist utopian vision.

This is so evident that eight years of Bush appointees have not been stalled or forced to back down by Democratic Party gridlock on confirmation. The Democrats KNOW that if Conservative Appointees equal or overtake the Left Wing Activist Judges Constitutional Intent will be more the measuring stick than the decision by fiat of Left Wing Judges.

So you Americans that are neither fringe Leftists or fringe Rightists (like I tend to lean toward) had best consider the judicial system in your vote for America.

If you vote for Obama you are definitely voting for change; however I assure you it is not the kind of change that derails politics as usual as Obama implies. A vote for Obama will be a Vote for fringe Leftist Utopianism that will lead America on a path to socialism and multi-cultural diversity (meaning the enfranchisement of illegal aliens and the incorporation of foreign cultural laws –Sharia Law – into our culture).

A vote for McCain will be more of a Center-Right future. I know McCain will not appoint fringe Leftist Judges; however I suspect he will appoint centrist-Right Judges. There is no mystery how a Leftist activist Judge will create by fiat new extra-Constitutional Law. McCain’s Appointees may vote Left or Right but it will be more principled. Sadly a McCain Appointee will probably keep the status quo; however at least a McCain Appointee will not actively create new laws (at least not without a good deal of precedent).

Thomas Sowell has some excellent thoughts on how Judges shape the future based on who is elected.

JRH

CRUSADERS NEED TO ENGAGE THE SARACENS

James Lewis is so awesomely correct. If the Medieval loving Mohammedans hate the West then let them also fear the West. The time for Politically Correctness to a group of people who only wish to end our democracies and civilized culture because it is neither Mohammedan nor lined up with Sharia Law needs to have a major paradigm shift.

Islamic radicals (which more and more are winning over so-called Moderates) refer to America and the coalition of the willing as being Crusaders. They mean it as an epithet praying that the West will forgot the violence, rape, pillaging and forced conversions by Mohammedan invaders building an empire. If the West wishes this entanglement of victimhood and corresponding violence to continue, then by all means let us propose Appeasement options to Mohammedan aggression. Other wise let us become Crusaders to engage the Saracen.

Does not the West have superior fire power? Do not anti-terrorists experts believe it is only a matter of time until Islamofascists unleash chemical or nuclear WMD? I say let the Islamofascists think real hard of what the consequences would be.

Let the West use their superior military infrastructure to strike fear in Middle Eastern communities that support Islamofascism. If an oil rich and savvy nation threatens with decreased oil, then take over the oil fields. If pro-Islamofascist communities protect or promote terrorists, blow them up. Strike fear in the heart of the so-called Umma. Then Mohammedans will deliver the radical Islamists to the West.

So does the West wish to live a half a century with terrorism (as Israel has) or does the West seriously wish to take off some years by switching from the Leftist paradigm of Appeasement to a paradigm Mohammedans understand: striking fear.