Be a Voice – De-Nuke Iran

Ben’s Blog is a remarkable source for information on that which is inherently evil in Islam vis-a-vie Western Culture.

Ben has alerted me to a website/web-community that has the purpose of encouraging the American government to be alert to all means necessary to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

The website is DeNuke Iran.

DeNuke Iran has this purpose:

What can we do?

Together collectively - thousands and thousands and thousands of us - we have a chance. Our voice can be heard.

Together we can raise hell.

The alternative is to leave our fate in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton and President Obama and the UN and the IAEA and the Europeans and the Russians.. Good luck.

Sign the declaration. Join the community.

Encourage others to do the same.

Our collective voice can be heard.

We must tell our policy makers to do whatever it takes to stop Iran.

And to do whatever it takes before it's too late.

This is the kind of “right wing extremism” that America’s Left fears. Not because DeNuke Iran is a hate site promoting violence, rather it is the Slanted Right willing to use a voice to gather a political voice to influence American voters away from Leftist appeasement foreign policy. Leftist appeasement is uncannily in the mold of the Neville Chamberlains of pre-WWII. British Prime Minister Chamberlain sought “peace in our time” at any cost. That cost was to allow Hitler to walk on the sovereignty of Germany’s near neighbors with the excuse of gathering Germanic speaking peoples into one nation. Thus Austria and the Sudetenland of (then) Czechoslovakia became part of the Nazi German Reich.

Chamberlain’s “peace in our time” was a delusive illusion that allowed the eventual slaughter of 12 million persons of which roughly 6 million were Jews.

President Barack Hussein Obama’s agenda of appeasement at any cost will make Israel vulnerable to extermination and will force America to choose between the cowardice moral bankruptcy or protecting American assets and allies.

The moral bankruptcy would be looking the other way as Islamic radicals fund Arabs that call themselves Palestinians, client Shi’ite Hezbollah, Syria and Iran strike out on the Islamic version of the “Final Solution” for Jewish Israel.

The other choice of honoring the protection of American assets and allies will lead the USA into a Johnny Come Lately situation as Britain was as the Nazis invaded Poland.

America will be at war regardless. The cliché of “pay me now or pay me later” will happen to America. The “pay me now” is preemptively preventing a nuclear Iran. It is true a preemptive action against Iran will lead to a war; however there will certainly be less carnage than the “pay me later” situation in which millions of civilians will die.

Of course if Obama chooses the cowardice of moral bankruptcy, then Americans will be safe in America – for awhile. America will cease to be that which makes America great. America will spiral down from hyper-power to an isolated nation that will submerge into Leftist globalist insignificance or fight for Her democratic-republic existence that began with the Declaration of Independence.

So check out this DeNuke Iran website and become part of a voice that showers Americans about the dangers of a nuclear armed Iran.

JRH 6/14/09

Iran Increases Militarization

John R. Houk
© May 19, 2009

Unless you have been camping under a political or fall for the delusional official statement that roughly goes “Our nuclear is totally for peaceful purposes,” you are cognizant that Iran is enriching weapons grade uranium. In spite of denials from the Iranian government it is obvious the Mullocracy intends to build a nuclear arsenal to one dominate the Middle East and two the extinguishing of the existence of Israel to reclaimed perceived dar al-Islam.

Adding fuel to this fire of Iranian military largesse is the fact that Iran is building a huge stockpile of long range missiles.

Now what do you think those long range missiles will be aimed at? Another question: when will Iran place a nuclear payload into the huge cache of long range missiles?

I suspect Joe American could answer those questions effectively with the data available minus the propaganda and manipulation of the Left and its false prophet the Mainstream Media (MSM). Okay allow me to stimulate those neural transmitters to allow you to think properly. The answer ain’t blowing in the wind my friends. The answer is the huge build-up of weapons grade uranium and the building of long range missiles equals Iranian adventurism (some may call it Islamic imperialism) at the expense of Israel and Western society.

JRH 5/19/09 (Hat Tip: CUFI)
**********************
Iran to mass produce long-range missiles

By YAAKOV KATZ
May 18, 2009 2:02 - Updated May 19, 2009 16:09
Jerusalem Post

Iran is in the midst of a multi-year plan that it hopes will culminate in the production of several hundred missile launchers and over 1,000 long-range ballistic missiles within the next six years, according to estimates in the Israeli defense establishment.

Teheran is believed to currently have an arsenal of 100-200 long-range Shihab missiles that have a range of up to 2,000 kilometers and carry up to one-ton warheads.
In addition, the Iranians last year test-fired a missile called Ashura believed to have recently entered production, the goal being to eventually replace the Shihab.

The Ashura is a solid-fuel missile, giving it a long shelf-life. Unlike the Shihab, it does not need to be fueled shortly before launching.

According to Israeli estimates, Iran's plan is to obtain 500 missile launchers and over 1,000 missiles with a range of 2,500 km. by 2015.

"The Iranians are making great efforts to obtain a significant number of missiles," said Tal Inbar, head of the Space Research Center at the Fisher Brothers Institute in Herzliya. "They already talk about how one of the ways they will overcome the missile defense systems is by firing salvos of missiles.

Inbar said that Iran was likely digging missile silos throughout the country that could be used to launch the Ashura solid-fuel missile.

In addition, regular trucks carrying hydraulic launchers could be manufactured in Iran and used as portable launchers, capable of firing from anywhere in the country.

According to estimates in Israel, Russia is still considering supplying the S-300 air defense system to Iran but is waiting to see what happens with the dialogue that the United States plans to hold with Iran.

Depending on the outcome of the dialogue and the status of relations between Washington and Moscow at the time, Russia will decide whether it will supply the system to Iran.

The S-300 is one of the most advanced multi-target anti-aircraft-missile systems in the world, with a reported ability to track up to 100 targets simultaneously while engaging up to 12 at the same time.

It has a range of about 200 kilometers and can hit targets at altitudes of 90,000 feet.
On Monday, the IAF will hold a countrywide exercise that the military stressed was not connected to current events.

The exercise will include the IAF's reserve forces and the public, should not be alarmed if it hears sirens and notices increased activity in Israel's skies, the army said.
__________________________

Iran Increases Militarization
John R. Houk
© May 19, 2009
__________________________

Iran to mass produce long-range missiles
© 1995 - 2009 The Jerusalem Post. All rights reserved.

London: Did Bush Lie?

I found an article written by Herbert London at the Hudson Institute. London reports on a largely ignored AP (MSM) report about the tons of YELLOW CAKE transported from Iraq to North America in 2008.

Yellow cake may not be a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) but it is the means to progress to nuke WMD.

Just because Saddam Hussein may have not progressed to make nuke weapons does not mean the yellow cake resource was not there to do so. Indeed, President Bush took down Saddam before the psycho genocidal Islamofascist dictator took advantage of his possession of yellow cake.

JRH 3/23/09

Israel Existence at Stake and Western Abandonment

It is unlikely that the Netanyahu led Israeli government and the Barack Administration will agree on a military strike to slow or terminate Iran’s nuclear weapon ambitions. With that in mind it has been leaked that Israel’s super-spy organization Mossad is in the process of another tactic to slow Iranian nuclear ambitions. That tact is the assassination of key people involved in the nuclear weaponry evolvement of the Iran nuke program.

To the deluded Left who may wish to accept a nuke armed Iran or the belief that Iran is not lying when it claims nuclearization is merely for peaceful energy purposes, this probably considered an international breach of protocol that still may lead to a Western confrontation with the psycho-Mullahs of Iran.

I say to Israel, “GO FOR IT!”

If Israel can slow down Iran in any way until someone in the West comprehends that Iran has a radical Islamic global agenda, then more power to the Israelis. God Almighty I just pray that someone in the West (not just America) comprehends the hegemonic goals of the psycho-Mullahs and their followers (such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad).

JRH 2/17/09

Deterrence against Iranian Retaliation

Here is an interesting perspective on actively engaging Iran and its nuclear program.

Should America and Israel shake in fear of Iranian verbal promises of retribution if their nuclear WMD capabilities are attacked? Or should America and Israel utilize their own verbal promises to inform Iran that a reprisal strike will follow any Iranian shenanigans that might harm the Iranian economy or weaken the Mullocracy grip on its people?

JRH 9/5/08

To Leftists: What Goes Around Comes Around

O my God, the duplicity of Leftists, Democrats and the Obama Campaign stooges is becoming old very quick.

Once Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain’s VP choice, the Dem Dummies’ first reaction was to attack Palin’s experience. As if Obama as a Presidential candidate could claim vast amounts of experience. The McCain camp immediately pointed out that Leftist hypocrisy.

Then the next day the Left Wing Mainstream Media tried to punch a hole in Sarah Palin’s integrity vainly attempting to directly link the Alaskan Governor to using State resources to fire a State Trooper. O yes the State Trooper abused the law of the land in relation to a bitter divorce from Sarah Palin’s sister and the threatening to the life of Sarah Palin’s father. Did the Left Wing MSM happen to mention that State Trooper Mike Wooten is still a State Trooper?

The abusive Slanted Left is relentless. NOW the Slanted Left tried to paint a picture that Sarah Palin’s youngest born was actually the child of her 17 year daughter Bristol Palin. The reality is the Lefties are wrong AGAIN!

Sarah Palin had to make public another portion of her family’s private life because of the lying Leftists. Bristol Palin is about five months pregnant and as of this date intends to marry the unborn child’s father. The April 18, 2008 birth of Trig Palin and Bristol Palin’s current pregnancy is a time line that cannot fit the Leftist accusations that Trig is Bristol’s baby.

This last muckraking by Leftists in favor of BHO should recall BHO’s public anger when independent Conservative campaigners went after Michelle for saying "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country." Of course Conservatives are not going to comply with that; however to avoid hypocrisy you would think the so-called candidate for “Change” would chastise his fellow fringe Lefties for going after the Palin family even before Labor Day Week-end passed. Check out Michelle Malkin’s comments on the BHO camp’s duplicity in this matter. Malkin’s comment exposes the difference between pro-life and pro-choice. That’s right the difference between baby-killers and those that believe in the sanctity of human life.

One parting shot at Obama’s Campaign: With all the hullabaloo over the Dem VP candidate in Foreign Affairs experience, you would think he would make better choices with his words.

Reportedly Biden told the officials he opposed "opening a additional military and diplomatic front" against Iran.

"Israel will have to reconcile itself with the nuclearization of Iran," Army Radio quoted Biden as telling the Israelis.

Army Radio said that at that time Israeli officials were shocked by Biden's comments. (Newsmax)

The “Army Radio” of the Newsmax article is actually the “US Jewish Army Radio.” Israeli Newspaper Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post picked up the Army Radio report. Since those newspapers broke the news Senator Joe Biden has denounced the report as lies instigated by the anti-Obama pundits. Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post have both published the Biden denial mostly because the Army Radio report was based on an off the record meeting and thus are not naming the source of the information or who else attended the meeting.

Since there is no named source Biden is relying on his Congressional and MSM reports of being extremely pro-Israel to debunk the Army Radio report.

So what is my parting shot point?

If Obama’s camp is going to dish dirt, the McCain camp is not going to stand there as a target for Leftist lies.

JRH 9/1/08 (Hat Tip ccpga)

Islamists Becoming Unbanned in Pakistan

So the Pentagon and the State Department are assuring Americans that Islamists will not get a foothold in Pakistan anytime soon?

Well since the Musharraf resignation banned Islamofascist terrorist organization have become unbanned in preparation for them to be involved in the political process in Pakistan.

Memory jogger: Currently Pakistan is the only Mohammedan nation (Iran is knocking at the door) that his nuclear WMD.

JRH 8/25/08 (Hat tip Islam in Action)

RE Pakistan: Remember Iran’s Revolution

Matthew Pennington writing for the AP has put together a report which claims that Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal is safe from Islamists.

Pennington’s report goes on to say that Pakistan has some kind of military tribunal with ten members called the Strategic Plans Division. And catch this: This tribunal was set up by Musharraf within one year of his first coming to power.

Pennington’s report says the Pentagon believes that the Pakistan Military would be in control of the nuclear arsenal through this tribunal. Thus a democratically elected Islamist government could not push nuke buttons. Further more the Pentagon believes an Islamist revolutionary take over if possible is years away. Like that should comfort Americans who should be aware Islamists would launch some kind of attack with nukes against American assets just because they could and in the name of Allah and his prophet Mohammed.

Another thing to think about: Any projection of Islamist revolution is not reassuring. The Shah of Iran was firmly an American ally. He was totally backed by Presidential Administrations until America’s delusional Leftist President Carter was elected. Carter took it upon himself to show the Shah’s harsh regime was evidence to throw the Shah under the proverbial bus. This thinking of Carter occurred toward an American ally even though then anti-American Egypt and Syria were (and are) every much as brutal as the Shah was.

I wonder how a new Leftist Appeaser such as Barack Obama would do if a charismatic Sunni Islamist began accruing popularity in Pakistan.

I think the Pentagon is using PR to assuage pundits to the actual potential of an Islamist regime in Pakistan.

When the Shah went into exile, Ayatollah Khomeini sanitized the Iranian military of pro-Shah leadership and just to make sure Khomeini began his own paramilitary force which has become known as the Revolutionary Guard.

Just think if some charismatic Sunni Cleric caught the imagination of the Pakistani people who are not exactly hip to the potential of moderate Pakistani Military rule or elitism always entering the political fray when there is a perception of emerging political chaos.

I think this is one of those “don’t believe everything you read moments.”

JRH 8/18/08

Musharraf Resigns, What Will Follow?

Pervez Musharraf has resigned before an impending impeachment proceedings in Pakistan’s Parliament.

Essentially Musharraf has been a go-between between America’s interest in prosecuting the Global War on Terror and the Islamists inside Pakistan that support the Taliban and al Qaeda, the two transnational terrorist organization in collusion for the attack on American soil.

So America, step back and take a breath. A democratically elected government in Pakistan could very possibly be an Islamist government. Imagine that! A Sunni Islamist Nuclear Power very near to an emerging nuclear power of Shi’ite Islamist Iran. How is that going to work out?

Is there enough hatred between Sunnis and Shi’ites to offset each other? Or will the Islamist hatred for Israel and America dissolve Sunni/Shi’ite differences to lead to an American/Israeli confrontation with a potential Islamist united front of Pakistan and Iran?

If the Sunni/Shi’ite bridge cannot be built, how would a democratically elected Islamist Pakistan government interact with America?

JRH 8/18/08

What is the Mystery about Iraq WMD?

Check this out:

Don Bordenkircher – who served two years as national director of prison and jail operations in Iraq– told WND that about 40 prisoners he spoke with "boasted of being involved in the transport of WMD warheads to Syria.

A smaller number of prisoners, he said, claimed "they knew the locations of the missile hulls buried in Iraq."

This is not the first inklings of the actual existence of Iraqi WMD. Former high level military officials of Saddam Hussein like Georges Sada (Find Georges Sada on page) have said the WMD were moved to Syria. Dave Gaubatz which was part of a team sent to Iraq to look for WMD pointed the finger where to look; however he was mysteriously ignored.

Many of these people (American teams, former Hussein regime individuals, Israeli Intelligence and so on) have all had pretty credible evidence via spoken corroboration. Obviously most of these finger pointers have their own agenda for going public; nonetheless there are simply way too many people to ignore.

So here is the mystery I can’t wrap my mind around: With all the criticism the Bush Administration has been hammered with which led to the expulsion of Republican control of Congress in 2006; why has not the Bush Administration been more opportunistic to point to these sources for vindication?

Another mystery: What’s with the Duelfer Report that dismisses all this information as irrelevant publicly saying there were no WMD in Iraq?

Has the government become so polarized politically between Left and Right that a total lack of cooperation exists to mutually justify an Iraqi invasion? Is the Bush Administration the victim of American government scandal in the amount of support militarily given to Saddam Hussein prior to Iraq War 1 or prior to Iraq War 2 (or both)? Would the public information be so embarrassing to the American government (which would include Bush 1 and the Clinton years) that GW Bush is willing to be the target of a Left that knows it can get away with lies?

It is a mystery that I hope I live long enough for history to report all the cloak and dagger background concerning Saddam Hussein, America and WMD.

JRH 7/31/08

The Hitler/Ahmadinejad Analogy Again

The analogy between Hitler and the rise of Islamofascism is not a new picture being portrayed by Conservatives. It seems the analogy is particularly pertinent to Iran which simultaneously openly speaks hatred of Israel and America while warning about the actions Iran will take if any nation (hmm … yeah, again Israel and/or Israel) does anything to hinder the Iranian nuke program. Incidentally everyone knows this Iranian nuke program is actually a Weapons of Mass Destruction program.

The powers that exist in this world blithely sit by believing that simply talking to Iranian leadership will convince that government how awful it would be to pursue the ability to nuke Israel. Iran says “let’s talk” and yet continues on its merry way to nuke WMD paradise with a policy of public denial or ok we’ll slow down or you can inspect what we’re doing to get out of Iran because we can do what we wish. In other words Iran with Nazi-like genius is putting the capable powers off until Iran has power to make a legitimate hegemonic move on the Middle East.

Just like in the 1930’s when the WWI weary pacifistic Europe thought talk and give and give would bring Hitler to his senses about European aggression, so are the EU powers and America slipping into the same trap again.

Hitler was emboldened by European give and give. How do you think Ahmadinejad (who has delusions of Islamic Messianism) will act after the EU promises of give and give to Iran?

Dr. Laurie Roth of the great State of Washington who was inspired by Thomas Sowell in turn inspired my thoughts on the old Hitler/Ahmadinejad analogy.

JRH 7/26/08

With or Without Nukes, Iran Is a Mortal Threat

Here is an interesting Op/Ed from Ayn Rand Institute (ARI) Objectivist Elan Journo.

I might mention that it surprises me an elite writer at ARI is for taking it to Iran for its obvious military belligerence toward the United States of America.

I am pleased Journo’s alludes action should be taken against Iran.

JRH 7/9/08

Leftist MSM still would have you believe Bush is a Goat

Five hundred and fifty metric TONS of yellow cake uranium was secretly removed from Iraq to a “port in Canada” which will be processed for use in energy producing nuclear reactors. The point is though the yellow cake is of the quality used to initiate the creation of nuclear WMD.

HUH?!

My God the Left has been blasting the Bush Administration that no WMD was found in Iraq thus the liar’s motto “Bush lied, people died.”

Hello! The Yellow Cake is smoking gun evidence that Saddam Hussein was at the very least preparing to make nuclear WMD.

And what of Valerie Plame’s husband Joe Wilson saying there was no deal between Niger and Iraq for Yellow Cake? Hmm … Iraq does not have Uranium naturally in it nation. Could Wilson and Plame be part of a Leftist propaganda machine to darken President Bush’s credibility when Bush could not respond in total to the lies for National Security reasons?

The war in Iraq is legitimate.

Now Iran is even closer to nuclear weaponry than Iraq was. What are we going to do about it?

I know what the Left wants to do about it. NOTHING!

Source Links:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080705/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_yellowcake_mission

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,376747,00.html

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/07/05/saddam-uranium.html

These are all AP wire stories picked up by Yahoo News, Fox News and CBC News. I have read that the AP itself may have taken the story down on its own website. If that is true what does that tell you of one of the largest Wire Services of the Mainstream Media? It tells you that a front page news story might make Bush a hero instead of a goat and that the MSM does not want that to happen to make Republicans look good during Election 2008.

What a bunch of Leftist hypocrites!

JRH (Hat tip to a language colorful post at the Military Brotherhood)

What is the IAEA and the MSM Thinking?

The International Atomic Energy Agency has said recently that Iran is “generally truthful about key aspects of its nuclear history”.

Apparently there is some mix up with IAEA or possibly the Mainstream Media (MSM) is reporting aspects of IAEA findings to add confusion about Iran’s nuclear program. The reason I say this is the IAEA seems to be reporting two opposite sides of the old coin.

The Middle East Forum (MEF) observes IAEA reports don’t seem to match the emphasis of a peaceful nuclear program in Iran:

“IAEA inspectors discovered traces of uranium metal used to build bombs, not fuel reactors. IAEA inspectors also found that Iran had experimented with chemical separation of polonium, a material used to initiate nuclear detonation.”

Now does that sound like Iran is reporting the truth about key aspects of its nuclear history? It is the truth only if you are a moron.

Either the IAEA is lying or the MSM is misreporting or both.

Bad ole’ Democrat Senator Byrd has taken umbrage to President Bush’s statement concerning Iran:

“’If you're interested in avoiding World War III,’ he said, it's necessary to deny the Islamic Republic ‘the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon.’”

Senate Byrd apparently wishes to be Ahmadinejad’s dhimmi by the tone of his retort:

(Byrd) “… accused the President's (sic) of using ‘rhetorical ghosts and goblins to scare the American people, with claims of an imminent nuclear threat in Iran.’”

Does finding traces of uranium metal used to build bombs and experimentation with the chemical separation of polonium which is used to initiate nuclear detonation sound ghosts and goblins to scare the American people or the clandestine manufacturing of nuclear weapons?

JRH

Possible Outcomes of Pakistani Crisis Might ...

Possible Outcomes of Pakistani Crisis Might Even Change a Democrat's Mind

Pervez Musharraf has imposed martial law in Pakistan. The official reason is because radical murdering Islamist terrorists are trying to bring their Theo-Political ideology as the rule of law and depose Musharraf.

I am certain there is an element of truth to the official reason; however I am betting the actual reason is elements outside of the military within the regime are trying to depose Musharraf, specifically Pakistan’s version of the Supreme Court.

Pakistan’s Supreme Court was about to rule on the legality of Musharraf’s election as President while retaining his spot as the head of the Pakistani military. The talk was the Court ruling was not going to happen to Musharraf’s benefit.

Although I am certain Musharraf would have used the military to brush off such a judicial ruling it would have angered the people in such a way that rioting might lead to sympathy to the radical Islamists followed by a Khomeini style people’s revolution.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and eight other judges refused to support Musharraf’s “emergency order.” Musharraf’s response was to depose the Chief Justice and rename another to replace him – Abdul Hameed Dogar.

Then there is the position of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto who returned to Pakistan recently under a deal with Musharraf to bring back democracy to Pakistan while siding with her families old military enemies to draw the people away from radical Islamism. Bhutto is a secular Socialist Muslim.

Bhutto officially complained about the Martial Law order; however I sense she understands her future in Pakistan will only occur with the military’s support combined with a hoped for elective support from the Pakistani people. Bhutto would be executed summarily if the likes of al Qaeda or the Taliban got their hands on her.

What was America’s official reaction? This from BBC News:

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the declaration of emergency rule was "highly regrettable" and called upon Pakistan to have free and fair elections.

In essence the US response was the politically correct response; a deposed Musharraf would be a huge hit on America’s war effort in the Middle East. It would be tough for America to lose an ally in Pakistan which could happen if Musharraf was deposed. There is the possibility that the Pakistan military might simply replace Musharraf with another top dog general and continue the policy of Musharraf under a different military political Administration.

Again though, a deposed Musharraf would pour prestige and allegiance of the Pakistani people to the radical Islamists. This could lead to a similar scenario of a Khomeini style revolution in Pakistan that the military could not stop without outright butchery and genocide.

What is the worst that could happen? O not much, a nuclear armed Wahhabi-Sunni-Taliban-al-Qaeda Islamist nation that hates America. The only plus would be incredible Sunni power probably would end the friendship with Shi’ite Iran who has no doubt been aiding the Waziristan Sunni radicals. I also suspect the old socialists in India will change their minds in rejecting America’s proffered hand of friendship and join in with American against radical Islamists in Pakistan and Iran.

Muslim Pakistan and Hindi India are nearly blood enemies and I suspect India could not stand for Mohammedan nuclear proliferation in the Middle East than America or Europe (although for different reasons).

Thus what Musharraf has done may be reported with media calm of just another dictatorial move in Pakistan; however I suspect the American military and policy strategists are scrambling to develop multiple alternative measures to choose from depending on which way the Pakistani crisis swings.

Is Al-Qaeda Psyops Slowly Taking Pakistan Piecemeal?

For those of you who do not follow the news very much or possibly you follow only selective portions of the news because in this day and age local political and geopolitical news is so immense that Joe American must pick and choose the news to follow as one perceives the effect the information has on our interests or lives.

Thus here is a tidbit of news you may have heard or not heard of: old Usama bin Laden (UBL) from location unknown but probably the Waziristan region of Northern Pakistan created an audio message to Pakistanis proclaiming President Pervez Musharraf as an a kafir (infidel) and a shirk (polytheist). Due to this proclamation Pakistanis should rise up and depose and assassinate Musharraf.

Also the audio addressed the Pakistan military to stand down and do nothing as the people rise up to through out the American loving apostate Musharraf.

Since the thrill of hearing UBL for the first time in years is wearing off the news coverage of the implications of how this may affect Pakistan and vis-a-vie the United States has somewhat worn off.

Steve Schippert writing for ThreatsWatch.org offers a remarkable analysis of Pakistan’s potential future which would not be good for America. Schippert believes Al-Qaeda has been operating a patient campaign to win the allegiance of various tribal territories in Pakistan. The Musharraf signing away of government control of Waziristan is an example of Al-Qaeda/Taliban interests gaining autonomous victory over the Pakistan military.

Here is something to think about that Schippert may not have known when writing his Pakistan threat analysis: Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto intends to return to Pakistan after being in exile since 1999. Benazir is the daughter of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. Ali Bhutto served both as President and Prime Minister of Pakistan. Ali Bhutto was quite popular with the Pakistani people, however the will to retain power led to a clash of wills with other ethnic elites in Pakistan led to Ali Bhutto’s demise. In a dubious trial that was considered rigged by Bhutto ethnic enemies found him guilty of corruption and murder. The military dictator of the time General Zia-ul-Hak made the execution was carried out.

Daughter Benazir Bhutto has also been popular, yet unproven accusations by the Bhutto family enemies had her deposed for charges of corruption. There is an underlying implication that Benazir’s exile is ending to counter the growing popularity of radical Islam in Pakistan. The Pakistan military and Musharraf have not publicly welcomed her back. Nawaz Sharif is another deposed Prime Minister who was sent back into exile to Saudi Arabia has Benazir not to trust Musharraf. Time will tell just how desperate Musharraf is.

Austrian Chancellor Denounces Iran’s Nuclear Progress, Kind of

As noted here President Sarkozy of France has denounced Iran for its enrichment of weapons grade uranium. Only the political hacks that are dependent or are political clients on Iran still stick to the Ahmadinejad story that the uranium enrichment program is for peaceful energy purposes only. The realists understand the Iran nuclear program is designed to become a nuclear Shia hegemonic power in the Middle East.

So it is fascinating that strong words come from Sarkozy since France has strongly been tied economically via oil to Iran.

Here is another surprise: Austria’s Chancellor Alfred Gusenbaur has also made strong statements toward Iran’s nuclear program. It is a surprise for Austria is part of a deal ($18 Billion) with the Nabucco Pipeline Project designed to “diversify” the EU’s energy needs. Part of that so-called diversification would be a direct link of Iran’s oil to Austria.

Gusenbaur while visiting Israel said about Iran:

“Iran must not only slow down its uranium enrichment activities, but stop it
completely. … [W]e have to track closely the sanctions on Iran, and even move
beyond them.”

As Ottolenghi says for contentions (and I paraphrase), that is quite a cryptic statement. Gusenbaur both publicly proclaims Iran’s nuclear process must be stopped completely and simultaneously down grades the strong words to “track closely the sanctions.”

Pentagon plan: Annihilate Tehran's military in 3 days

WorldNetDaily has sourced the London Sunday Times report of Alexis Debat of the Nixon Center alluding that the Pentagon is planning a three day blitz to cripple the Iranian military and knock out Iran’s capability.

I realize this is a he-said she-said line of reporting which usually ends up adding or leaving out details by the time the last media source publishes what they know; however the talk has been in the background for some time.

Often times these are clandestine government releases intended as warnings or to get a feel for the potential public reaction by individuals and various nations. If the intent is a warning to Iran of imminent hostilities the War on Terror is about to move up to the next level.

The next level response is really unknown. Many experts believe Iran is capable to escalate the stakes themselves. Some experts believe such a military strike will ruin the Iranian economy thus neutralizing Iranian responses.

Time will tell if America’s intentions are ready to initiate the next level or if it is merely saber rattling to match Iranian saber rattling.

Another Call for MAD Deterrent Against Terrorism

I personally have been an advocate for blowing up Mohammedan shrine cities or locations if Islamofascists successfully commit another act of terrorism on American soil. Yes, I know, it sounds so unchristian and medieval; nonetheless that is the nature of the enemy on the War on Terror.

About a month ago I posted an article from Dr. Don Boys (International Director for Common Sense Today) in which he advocates a modified form of the old Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) deterrent against radical Islamists.

Those who call Dr. Boys and me a warmonger might point out that officially not one Mohammedan dominated nation officially advocates Terrorism, thus the Terrorist Organizations of the world operate independently of a national agenda. The reasoning being Mohammedans and Mohammedan nations cannot be held accountable for the actions of the minority representative Mohammedan terrorists.

The fact is clear is that the globe is fully aware that Mohammedan nations tolerate Terrorists on their sovereign land mostly by agreement with their ideology and some because of their weakness to enforce their sovereignty. The sovereign weakness in itself can be attributed to mightier Mohammedan nations that directly support Terrorist Organizations. In some cases the weak sovereign nations officially denounce terrorism but a majority of their populace is strongly behind the hated filled ideology of Islamofascism (Sunni and Shia).

To the above scenarios I say tough! If there were any honesty in promoting global peace via a democratic paradigm, Mohammedan nations would squelch the wickedness of Islamofascism. The truth is most of the Mohammedan Middle East actually teaches in their schools, madrassas, Mosques and media forms the same hate toward America, the West and Israel that Islamofascist act out. I do not buy the statistics that a majority of Mohammedans in the Middle East find the actions of Islamofascist Terrorist organizations as reprehensible. In the back of mind I still remember the television cameras panning Palestinian-Arab cities showing Mohammedan citizens pouring into the streets in jubilant celebration that 9/11 occurred in America.

Citizens of Saudi Arabia are responsible for distributing hate filled literature to Mosques and madrassas in America and Europe promoting the Wahhabi school of Mohammedanism. The very school of thought that al Qaeda and Saudi born Usama bin Laden perpetuate. The Muslim Brotherhood centered in Egypt is active in distributing their version of Mohammedan hated and medievalism globally as well. Hamas is a benefactor of the Muslim Brotherhood. Why has Egypt not shut down the Muslim Brotherhood? Because chaos would ensue in Egypt due the popularity among the Mohammedan citizens of Egypt. Shi’ite Hezbollah residing as an independent military/terrorist organization in Lebanon preaches their hate and acts of violence as sustained by the crazy Mullahs in Iran (via nearly puppet state Syria).

I am sure I have left some Islamist nuts out that reside in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Indonesia and so on. My point is that Mohammedans can and should be held accountable for not deterring the actions of the so-minority Islamofascists.

I hear from Terrorist experts that it is inevitable that some kind of nuke or dirty bomb will be detonated in America. How should America respond to the deaths of her citizens in potential numbers that will make 9/11 appear to be a picnic in comparison? Maybe American politicians, bureaucrats and diplomats should sit on their hands and wag their mouths about how America needs to engage in greater dialogue, diplomacy and negotiation? BY GOD NO!

If a crude nuke is set off in America that will have proven those tactics DO NOT WORK WITH ISLAMOFASCIST TERRORISTS.

A modified Mutually Assured Destruction plan might be effective, to wit: Voraciously publicize if crude nukes, dirty bombs or chemical weapons are unleashed in America; America will begin targeting Mohammedan Holy cities and Holy sites. This would be a MAD tit-for-tat warning that America would need to follow through.

Presidential candidate Tom Tancredo has endorsed such a deterrent. It does not change my mind as to who I would like to win the Republican nomination; however taking such a politically incorrect stand is bold, courageous and raises his political credentials in my sight.

Will Anyone Stop Iran?

I find it amazing that the global powers that be have totally ignored what Iran is doing. Iran is even a detriment to the environment by the amount of trees wasted in Security Council Resolutions ignored and blown off.

It is evident that Western impotence to taking action to prevent a nuclear Iran has led to Western acquiescence to the existence of a nuclear armed WMD Iran.

Bush has been rendered harmless by Democratic Party Congressional control in America. Olmert is harmless because he is incompetent in governing a strong Israel in both management and execution of Israel’s National Interests.