skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Vice President Joe Biden has been caught lying about conversations with President Bush while Biden was still a Senator from Delaware.
Of course VP Biden could not help it. Democrats lie, it is in the nature of the Leftist dominated Democrat Party to lie. Leftists are well aware that their vision of a utopia requires individuals to be submerged in the will of the State while the State pretends to care about the will of individuals by classing the one into the many of a collective. That which is deemed right for the collective must be right for the individual.
Due to this encoded nature of Democrats VP Biden could not help to be a liar.
The thing is the voters believed the liars in 2008 because the Dems had the back-up of the Mainstream Media (MSM) to first paint a vilified picture of President Bush and then capitalized on that portrait to through mud on Senator McCain and call it the same mud from President Bush.
And here we are in April 2009 and America is on the way to be a socialized nation in which the very rights deemed intruded upon by President Bush are being shredded by the Obama Administration. The Obama/Biden Administration is slowly eroding Capitalism and private ownership.
In the spirit of Leftist Democrats lying VP Biden is using a position of political power to shift focus from what Obama is doing to remind voters of the pre-November 2008 portrait of the Bush Administration. By publically performing this reminder via self-aggrandizement, VP Biden pushes the agenda of America accepting the Obama transformation toward socialism by reminding America of the Leftist portrait of Bush-America.
Read Karl Rove adamantly refuting VP Biden’s non-existent conversations with President Bush.
JRH 4/10/09
.JPG)
Victor Davis Hanson writes a parody using Sarah Palin’s name yet pointing out the many gaffe’s of Joe Biden.
I had no idea the classical historian had such a sense of humor. At first I was outraged being kind of slow to realize a classicist was utilizing such wit in political humor.
Then I wondered if I was actually reading a Hanson column. I checked to see if by mistake I went to Ann Coulter. After the double take and realizing the hilarity of Hanson’s pointed parody, I sat back and relaxed to enjoy the read.
You should as well.
JRH 10/2/08
.JPG)
I pray you read this remarkable write-up about Senator Joe Biden before you watch or listen to tonight’s debate.
As you listen to the answers or responses in this Vice-Presidential debate between Governor Palin and Senator Biden you need to realize Biden is not the image the Left Wing Mainstream Media has painted of him and Palin is not the person that lying Leftist pundits have painted of her.
Read the Human Events portrait of Joe Biden.
JRH 10/2/08
O my God, the duplicity of Leftists, Democrats and the Obama Campaign stooges is becoming old very quick.
Once Sarah Palin was announced as John McCain’s VP choice, the Dem Dummies’ first reaction was to attack Palin’s experience. As if Obama as a Presidential candidate could claim vast amounts of experience. The McCain camp immediately pointed out that Leftist hypocrisy.
Then the next day the Left Wing Mainstream Media tried to punch a hole in Sarah Palin’s integrity vainly attempting to directly link the Alaskan Governor to using State resources to fire a State Trooper. O yes the State Trooper abused the law of the land in relation to a bitter divorce from Sarah Palin’s sister and the threatening to the life of Sarah Palin’s father. Did the Left Wing MSM happen to mention that State Trooper Mike Wooten is still a State Trooper?
The abusive Slanted Left is relentless. NOW the Slanted Left tried to paint a picture that Sarah Palin’s youngest born was actually the child of her 17 year daughter Bristol Palin. The reality is the Lefties are wrong AGAIN!
Sarah Palin had to make public another portion of her family’s private life because of the lying Leftists. Bristol Palin is about five months pregnant and as of this date intends to marry the unborn child’s father. The April 18, 2008 birth of Trig Palin and Bristol Palin’s current pregnancy is a time line that cannot fit the Leftist accusations that Trig is Bristol’s baby.
This last muckraking by Leftists in favor of BHO should recall BHO’s public anger when independent Conservative campaigners went after Michelle for saying "For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country." Of course Conservatives are not going to comply with that; however to avoid hypocrisy you would think the so-called candidate for “Change” would chastise his fellow fringe Lefties for going after the Palin family even before Labor Day Week-end passed. Check out Michelle Malkin’s comments on the BHO camp’s duplicity in this matter. Malkin’s comment exposes the difference between pro-life and pro-choice. That’s right the difference between baby-killers and those that believe in the sanctity of human life.
One parting shot at Obama’s Campaign: With all the hullabaloo over the Dem VP candidate in Foreign Affairs experience, you would think he would make better choices with his words.
Reportedly Biden told the officials he opposed "opening a additional military and diplomatic front" against Iran.
"Israel will have to reconcile itself with the nuclearization of Iran," Army Radio quoted Biden as telling the Israelis.
Army Radio said that at that time Israeli officials were shocked by Biden's comments. (
Newsmax)
The “Army Radio” of the Newsmax article is actually the “US Jewish Army Radio.” Israeli Newspaper Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post picked up the Army Radio report. Since those newspapers broke the news Senator Joe Biden has denounced the report as lies instigated by the anti-Obama pundits. Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post have both published the Biden denial mostly because the Army Radio report was based on an off the record meeting and thus are not naming the source of the information or who else attended the meeting.
Since there is no named source Biden is relying on his Congressional and MSM reports of being extremely pro-Israel to debunk the Army Radio report.
So what is my parting shot point?
If Obama’s camp is going to dish dirt, the McCain camp is not going to stand there as a target for Leftist lies.
JRH 9/1/08 (Hat Tip ccpga)
I find it interesting that one of the Democratic Party’s greatest critics (Senator Biden) of the Iraq war is calling for American troops to go to Darfur to end the genocide. I am guessing that Biden was one of the many Democrats that agreed Saddam had to have been taken out before America’s invasion to topple a genocidal-terrorist loving dictator. The reason for the invasion was Saddam’s possession of WMD or the wish to develop nuclear WMD. The WMD was not found. From that time forward Bush hating Democrats tried to simultaneously cover their political butts and rock the Republican world of its control of government by blaming Bush.
President Bush’s problem was he placed all the eggs in the WMD basket and did not emphasize the rogue state nature of Saddam’s Iraq. Saddam can definitely be linked to aiding terrorists in Israel and there are back door connections to the likes of al-Qaeda. Saddam was the member of the Sunni minority that occupied a nearly oil-free portion of Iraq. In order to insure his grip of power Saddam slaughtered thousands of Shi’ite and Kurdish Iraqis. Should Saddam’s reign have been terminated? Definitely!
And that WMD pickle: There are many who still believe WMD was there and the Russian and/or Syrians were able to walk away with the evidence. Therein lay the Bush mistake. The military plan to topple Saddam was solid; the military plan to secure Iraq from outside interference was a debacle.
Now that I have set up a brief look of the cause and effect of the Iraq war, let us return to Joe Biden. Why would Biden favor sending Americans to a similar radical Islamist maelstrom in Sudan and complain that America should never have toppled the psychotic government of Saddam Hussein? Is Biden being compassionate? Where is the compassion for the Iraqis dieing from internecine religious conflict created by Saddam Hussein? Darfur will be the same maelstrom as Iraq.
“The war was unnecessary, Biden asserted.
“The president took us to war unncessarily, without letting the weapons inspectors finish their work, without enough troops, without the right equipment for the troops that we sent, without the proper care for those (wounded) who were taken home.” (San Francisco Sentinel 5/21/07)
Biden is 100% correct by the way. America should end the Darfur genocide. America should topple the Islamofascist leadership of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir. Also America should battle Islamofascists in Iraq. There is one thing I do agree with Biden: give up on a central democratic Iraqi government. I somewhat like Biden’s idea of an autonomous federated Iraq divided into three regions; however this will only work with an American presence as well. Why? Because of our friend (cough) enemy Iran.
JRH
*******************************************
Biden favors U.S. troops for Darfur
By EDITH M. LEDERER, Associated Press Writer
May 21, 2007 11:05 PM ET
Yahoo News
Democratic presidential hopeful Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record) called again Monday for U.S. troops to help quell the violence in Sudan's Darfur region, drawing a strong rebuke from Sudan's U.N. envoy.
The comments from the Delaware senator, who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, came as he led a bipartisan delegation to the United Nations for talks with key U.N. officials.
"The bottom line was this: There's genocide taking place," Biden said, adding that the world can't wait several months for action on the ground.
"Were I able to make the decision, I would impose a no-fly zone immediately, and I would commit forces to stop the janjaweed now. But I am not making that decision."
Biden, who made a similar call last month, confirmed that the forces he was referring to were U.S. troops.
Darfur's conflict between ethnic African rebels and the government — backed by Arab janjaweed militias — has killed more than 200,000 people and displaced 2.5 million others. A beleaguered 7,000-strong African Union force has been unable to stop the fighting.
Sudanese Ambassador Abdelmahmood Abdelhaleem, however, insisted "there is nothing in Darfur that is lagging," citing momentum for new political talks and movement on peacekeeping.
He said Biden's remarks were "not warranted at all because the peace process is moving."
President Bush warned a month ago that he would tighten economic sanctions and impose new ones unless Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir started making definite moves toward peace. Ban urged Bush to give diplomacy more time.
____________________________
Hmmm … Biden Says Send Troops to Darfur
John R. Houk
© May 21, 2007
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Biden favors U.S. troops for Darfur
Copyright © 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
.JPG)
.JPG)
Posts
