Wahhabi Video

Here is the thing, the more I dig the more it seems Islamists dominate Mosques in the Europe and America. And to add further confirmation to that here is a GodTube video of a reporter clandestinely hanging out in a British Mosque.

Islam: Women, Freedom and Liberty

If you listen to a Mohammedan about womanhood you might have heard such lies as a woman is protected and has equality.

And yet one reads of honor killings of Mohammedan women in Western culture because of some moral insult to their faith. Can you imagine that? In Western democracies where allegedly an individual is free to choose a religion or not, choose a level of morality, choose a style of living according to one’s means and so on; a religious order comes to the West in which its tenets of faith absolutely come into conflict with Liberty and Freedom and people die in an honor killing or because an offense was given to their deity and pseudo-prophet.

Now what blows my mind, the West has hopped onto the band wagon of political correctness out of concern for insulting diverse individuals or religions. Thus Mohammedans become homicidal maniacs, the inherently violent for religious reasons or rapists because it is morally acceptable to rape an infidel. These things are ALL tolerated in the West.

God forbid that a Westerner hold a person accountable because their foreign religion or creed says that heinous illegal acts can be executed scripturally. This infection of blind tolerance is pervasive in Europe toward Mohammedanism. The police will not enforce the rule of law in neighborhoods or communities in which Mohammedans are the majority.

The rule of law is still enforced in America if the Mohammedan murderer or assaulter is caught; however the honor killing of women still happens and violence among intolerant Mohammedans still occur in America. Will America ever forsake their legal rule of law heritage like Europe and proffer protection for Mohammedan peculiarities and hold a different standard for non-Mohammedan? Let us pray not.

There is a blogger who has adopted the nom de plume of Curmudgeon Emeritus and has written an excellent piece on Mohammedanism and women. Man you have got to READ IT.

What is Weakening the West from Within?

Vanishing American has posted one of the best Christian Apologist essays I have read in some time. There is a lot of content in the essay. It is entitled, “Is Christianity Weakening us?” If I grasped the message correctly (I read it quickly), Vanishing American is saying that some anti-jihadists are blaming Christianity for a slow destruction of the West from within allowing a toe-hold of migrating Mohammedans.

Then the essayist refutes this premise by saying it is the intrusion of Left Wing thought that has corrupted the nature of Christianity to instill a guilt complex upon Churches infected by this liberalism.

If I understand Vanishing American’s essay properly I whole heartedly agree. The success of radical Islamists in Western culture is the result of a Leftist view of egalitarianism that expects an intolerant death cult will assimilate into free speech/thinking tolerant Westernism. This same Western Leftist thinking has placed a politically correct guilt complex upon them self to feed Mohammedan non-existent victimhood over a time of exploiting Western colonialism.

If Christianity is weakening the West, it is the diluted denominations that have rejected Biblical Morality and the supernatural power of the Godhead.

I am more than a little impressed that Vanishing American criticizes one of the greatest anti-jihadist writers of Europe – the blogger Fjordman. I have to tell you I am an admirer of Fjordman thus I am a bit impressed with Vanishing America to put forth logical reasons as to why Christianity is NOT weakening the West, rather it is “liberal” Leftist transformation that has become a virus in much of mainstream denomination.

Israel Preparing Nuclear Action Against Iran?

The Sunday Times of London has revealed that Israel is preparing military plans to utilize precision low yield nuclear strikes on Iranian nuclear targets.

Wow!

I will let you read the details that the Times revealed. I wish to talk about the consequences and potential benefits of such a military adventure.

First let us consider propaganda. Ahmadinejad has frequently and often been saying that Israel will be wiped of the map while simultaneously bragging about Iran’s nuclear progress. One does not have to be a math genius to add two plus two equals four. Israel’s calculations needs to weigh is Ahmadinejad an evil maniacal Islamofascist leader or is he merely posture with propaganda to enable Iran to be a military power in the Middle East.

If Ahmadinejad is a maniac, then it is simple addition: two plus two equals four.

If Ahmadinejad is posturing to be a regional power to deal with in the Middle East, then the equation is a bit more complicated with yet to be known variables that will end with a global answer.

If Israel’s calculations are based on simple math, then Israel may be leaking their intentions to have Ahmadinejad or his Ayatollah elders soften their public stand as well as open the Iranian so-called peaceful nuclear program to unrestrained IAEA inspection. This would be a little tit-for-tat hard line propaganda between Israel and Iran. If Iran ups the ante in the propaganda, Israel may actually follow through unilaterally on their leaked information.

I say “unilaterally” because Israel is beginning to have the impression that the Bush Administration might become hamstrung by the Democratic Party dominated U.S. Congress. This means Israel feels alone in battling for its existence. There is NO way Israel could allow an Islamofascist Iran to be armed with nuclear WMD. Israel (and I) believes that would lead to a 21st century Holocaust.

If Israel’s calculations are based on a more difficult equation, then Israel would have to think of the consequences of Jewish hatred fueled not only in the Middle East, but in the West as well. If anti-Semitism is growing now in the West, it could become huge if Israel uses nuclear weapons on a first strike basis. Such anti-Semitism could threaten Israel existentially as much as Iran wiping the Jewish State off of the map. If America abandons Israel due to a Slanted Left and Paleo-con strengthened anti-Israel political position, then Israel will in affect have zero powerful backers.

Let us next consider that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad anti-Semite war mongering words are not propaganda but rather the will of the ruling Ayatollah elites of Iran.

If the Bush Administration also believes that Ahmadinejad rhetoric is beginning to be a mixture of Twelver Shi’ite theology and political policy, then the American military may be positioning to aid Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites. I say this because there has been speculation due to who is taking over CentCom over American forces in Iraq. Admiral William Fallon is the speculated replacement for retiring General Abizaid.

Do you catch this? A Navy man is replacing an Army man as Commander of Ground and Naval forces in the Iraq and Afghanistan area. There have also been additions to Carriers and Naval support vessels to the area. Hmm… Could there be a coordination of a military strike with Israel on Iran?

Is it possible that Bush senses that there will be no financial support to complete the job in Iraq and thus is willing to take a gamble on escalating engagement with Iran’s nuclear ambitions? There are indications that this might be the change of strategy that Bush is proceeding with.

Let us examine if Israel operates unilaterally without American help. Assuming Israel is successful on Times information on three targets; what will be the consequences for Israel? The repercussions could range from the extreme to the mild.

Of Iran has threatened it will unleash the full anger of terrorism on the West which will include disrupting the flow of oil to the West. Depending on the success in carrying out Iranian threats other Mohammedan nations may join; however there is the Sunni/Shi’ite conflict. Secretly Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi sect of the Sunni) may relish a diminishment of Iran, though I doubt the Saudis would express this glee publicly.

What happens if America acts unilaterally to strike Iranian nuclear sites? Probably same results that Israel experiences would be the outcome.
What happens if Israel and America act in tandem with precision strikes against Iran nuclear sites? Again the result of anger will be the same.

Europe is too cowardly to act.

Russia and China are too invested too act.

That leaves America and Israel. They might as well do something they have actually done in the past: a joint military precision military strike to set Iranian nuclear ambitions back. Let the consequences fall where they may.

U.N. Security Council to vote on Iran

The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to vote today (Saturday) on sanctions on Iran due to its nuclear program. If you have had your head in the sand, the West and Israel perceive the only possible reason Iran would engage in nuclear power is to refine uranium for weapons grade plutonium.

Iran denies the accusation and claim they are building nuclear plants for civilian and peaceful purposes. It is Iran’s President Ahmadinejad that makes Iran’s claim doubtful. Ahmadinejad continuously in public speeches calls for Israel to be wiped off the map and threatens the West and America if they interfere with Iran’s nuclear program.

Peace and war drums simply do not match up.

The Security Council problem is that permanent members Russia and China have an extensive economic relationship with Iran that works both ways. I will be fascinated to see if those to nations will veto any Security Council Resolution that imposes sanctions that have any teeth that can bite Iran.