Sharon Stone Makes Pro-Arab Statement While Touring the Middle East

I received this email from writer Aaron Klein who writes for World Net Daily, Ynet News (Israel) and is the author of the book Schmoozing with Terrorists:

Terrorists Go Ga Ga Over Sharon Stone, Says Mideast Correspondent
Aaron Klein
2/20/2008 5:47 PM

Mideast terrorist leaders recently thanked actress Sharon Stone for claiming to the pan-Arab media the U.S. used the Sept. 11 attacks as "pretext" for launching wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In her interview with Al Hayat, Stone also lamented what she called Americans' decision to ignore the deaths of so many Iraqis.

"I feel at great pain when the spotlight is on the death of 4,000 American soldiers, while 600,000 Iraqi deaths are ignored," Stone told Al Hayat.

In interviews with Mideast reporter Aaron Klein, the terrorists stated Stone's remarks, published this week in Arabic, reinforce their views that current U.S. foreign policy is leading America toward destruction.

"What Stone said strengthens what we have been saying all along - that the Bush administration and the American evangelical Christians who control U.S. policy are leading America to defeat," said Muhammad Abel-Al, spokesman and senior leader of the Popular Resistance Committees terrorist organization.

Click here to see what other terror leaders have to say about Stone's comments.

The “Click here” link is a WND story by Aaron Klein that elaborates on Sharon Stone’s sympathies for Arab terrorists while denigrating the U.S. presence she says 600,000 Iraqis died.

Actress Stone says the homicidal suicide attacks by Muslim terrorists on 9/11 was used as a “pretext” to launch wars against “Afghanistan and Iraq.”

Well duh! After over a quarter century of transnational terrorist attacks on Americans and American assets abroad, an attack on American soil will lead to war.

What is it that World War II hero Patton said about going home from war?

Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the b_stards who started it. The quicker they are whipped, the quicker we can go home. The shortest way home is through Berlin and Tokyo. And when we get to Berlin, I am personally going to shoot that paper hanging son-of-a-b_tch Hitler. Just like I'd shoot a snake!

When a man is lying in a shell hole, if he just stays there all day, a German will get to him eventually. The hell with that idea. The hell with taking it. My men don't dig foxholes. I don't want them to. Foxholes only slow up an offensive. Keep moving. And don't give the enemy time to dig one either. We'll win this war, but we'll win it only by fighting and by showing the Germans that we've got more guts than they have; or ever will have. We're not going to just shoot the sons-of-b_tches, we're going to rip out their living G_ddamned guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy Hun cock suckers by the bushel-f_cking-basket.

War is a bloody, killing business. You've got to spill their blood, or they will spill yours. Rip them up the belly. Shoot them in the guts. When shells are hitting all around you and you wipe the dirt off your face and realize that instead of dirt it's the blood and guts of what once was your best friend beside you, you'll know what to do! (Excerpt of Patton's Speech to the Troops in England May 31, 1944)

Ms Stone war is not a game. When the enemy attacks you and kills your people, you either surrender or fight to win. If you fight to win, you want to kill more of the enemy than the enemy kills of you. War is not a Hollywood party getting juiced on alcohol or whatever illegal narcotic. The cliché comes to mind: War is hell.

Of course the other alternative is available – surrender. Look at what happens in the Middle East in Mohammedan society. It is particularly not a pleasant place to live if you are not a Mohammedan. The promiscuity and debauchery that Hollywood is noted for practicing would be a death sentence in that society. Ms Stone you are concerned about 600,000 Iraqi casualties of war. You should be concerned of global Jihad in which if Islam controlled your society, you would have your head lopped off.
_______________________

Sharon Stone Makes Pro-Arab Statement While Touring the Middle East
John R. Houk
© February 21, 2008

About Patton’s excerpt: The profanity General Patton used in the normal course of interaction with his troops is offensive; nonetheless he backed it up by being one of the winningest field Generals of World War II. He was such a winner that politicians had to slow him down out of fear his exuberance would offend our then Soviet allies and start a new war.

Gateway Pundit on Anbar Awakening

Here is an awesome post from Gateway Pundit. It demonstrates how the Democrats are in denial about an Anbar Awakening that foreign insurgents (al Qaeda in particular) are crazy psycho radical that are evil and mean to do evil to those who disagree with them: Christians, Jews, other religions, Atheists and even fellow Mohammedans.

Gateway Pundit leads his post with a propaganda video that implies support against insurgency. I wish I could read Arabic to be certain; nonetheless the visuals are very effective: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AIjGchpYGM.

Dhimmicrats have said we are losing so much the American people are beginning to believe it. Read Al-Anbar Awakening: How Muslims Confronted the Hirabah.

Middle East Imperative

I originally found this essay posted via the Blind Conservatives E-list. As I the essay I found it to be astonishingly honest. Brig. Gen. Cash claims to be a Democrat yet also says he is disgusted with how far Left his Political Party of choice has gone. Cash also claims to be a Conservative but definitely not a Republican. Cash feels the Republicans have screwed up the prosecution of the War in Iraq yet reserves a little praise for the Republicans in that under Republican Presidents the military prospered and were demoralized under Democratic Presidents.

I was a little concerned about the lack of credentials the Blind Conservative Post had; so I Googled Brig. Gen. Jimmy L. Cash and found volumes of Blogs had posted this very essay. I guess I am late in the case of my posting; nonetheless it is so brilliant I am posting it anyway.

I found this little auto-biographical essay by Cash at Gunner’s Blog.

JRH 9/6/07
**********************

Middle East Imperative

Jim Cash
PDF Version has more content
Origin of Essay

I wrote recently about the war in Iraq and the larger war against radical Islam, eliciting a number of responses. Let me try and put this conflict in proper perspective. Understand, the current battle we are engaged in is much bigger that just Iraq. What happens in the next year will affect this country and how our kids and grandkids live throughout their lifetime, and beyond. Radical Islam has been attacking the West since the seventh century. They have been defeated in the past and decimated to the point of taking hundreds of years to recover. But they can never be totally defeated. Their birth rates are so far beyond civilized world rates that in time they recover and attempt to dominate again.

There are eight terror-sponsoring countries that make up the grand threat to the West. Two, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan just need firm pressure from the West to make major reforms. They need to decide who they are really going to support and commit to that support. That answer is simple. They both will support who they think will hang in there until the end, and win. We are not sending very good signals in that direction right now, thanks to the Democrats.

The other six, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea and Libya will require regime change or a major policy shift. Now, let’s look more closely.

Afghanistan and Iraq have both had regime changes, but are being fueled by outsiders from Syria and Iran. We have scared Gaddafi’s pants off, and he has given up his quest for nuclear weapons, so I don’t think Libya is now a threat. North Korea (the non-Islamic threat) can be handled diplomatically by buying them off. They are starving.
That leaves Syria and Iran. Syria is like a frightened puppy. Without the support of Iran they will join the stronger side. So where does that leave us? Sooner, or later, we are going to be forced to confront Iran, and it better be before they gain nuclear capability.

In 1989 I served as a Command Director inside the Cheyenne Mountain complex located in Colorado Springs, Colorado for almost three years. My job there was to observe (through classified means) every missile shot anywhere in the world and assess if it was a threat to the US or Canada. If any shot was threatening to either nation I had only minutes to advise the President, as he had only minutes to respond. I watched Iran and Iraq shoot missiles at each other every day, and all day long, for months. They killed hundreds of thousand of their people. Know why? They were fighting for control of the Middle East and that enormous oil supply.

At that time, they were preoccupied with their internal problems and could care less about toppling the west. Oil prices were fairly stable and we could not see an immediate threat.

Well, the worst part of what we have done as a nation in Iraq is to do away with the military capability of one of those nations. Now, Iran has a clear field to dominate the
Middle East, since Iraq is no longer a threat to them. They have turned their attention to the only other threat to their dominance, the United States. They are convinced they will win, because the United States is so divided, and the Democrats (who now control Congress and may control the Presidency in 2008) have openly said we are pulling out.

Do you have any idea what will happen if the entire Middle East turns their support to Iran, which they will obviously do if we pull out? It is not the price of oil we will have to worry about. Oil will not be made available to this country at any price. I personally would vote for any presidential candidate who did what JFK did with the space program---declare a goal to bring this country to total energy independence in a decade.

Yes, it is about oil. The economy in this country will totally die if that Middle East supply is cut off right now. It will not be a recession. It will be a depression that will make 1929 look like the “good-old-days”.

The bottom line here is simple. If Iran is forced to fall in line, the fighting in Iraq will end over night, and the nightmare will be over. One way or another, Iran must be forced to join modern times and the global community. It may mean a real war---if so, now is the time, before we face a nuclear Iran with the capacity to destroy Israel and begin a new ice age. I urge you to read the book “END GAME” by two of our best Middle East experts, true American patriots and retired military generals, Paul Vallely and Tom McInerney. They are our finest, and totally honest in their assessment of why victory in the Middle East is so important, and how it can be won. Proceeds for the book go directly to memorial fund for our fallen soldiers who served the country during the war on terror. You can find that book by going to the internet through Stand-up America at http://www.ospreyradio.us/or http://www.rightalk.com/.

On the other hand, we have several very angry retired generals today, who evidently have not achieved their lofty goals, and insist on ranting and raving about the war. They are wrong, and doing the country great harm by giving a certain political party reason to use them as experts to back their anti-war claims.

You may be one of those who believe nothing could ever be terrible enough to support our going to war. If that is the case I should stop here, as that level of thinking approaches mental disability in this day and age. It is right up there with alien abductions and high altitude seeding through government aircraft contrails. I helped produce those contrails for almost 30 years, and I can assure you we were not seeding the atmosphere. The human race is a war-like population, and if a country is not willing to protect itself, it deserves the consequences. Nuff-said!!!

Now, my last comments will get to the nerve. They will be on politics. I am not a Republican. And, George Bush has made enough mistakes as President to insure my feelings about that for the rest of my life. However, the Democratic Party has moved so far left, they have made me support those farther to the right.

I am a conservative who totally supports the Constitution of this country. The only difference between the United States and the South American, third world, dictator infested and ever-changing South American governments, is our US Constitution.

This Republic (note I did not say Democracy) is the longest standing the world has ever known, but it is vulnerable. It would take so little to change it through economic upheaval. There was a time when politicians could disagree, but still work together. We are past that time, and that is the initial step toward the downfall of our form of government. I think that many view Bush-hating as payback time. The Republicans hated the Clintons and now the Democrats hate Bush. So, both parties are putting their hate toward willingness to do anything for political dominance to include lying and always taking the opposite stand just for the sake of being opposed. JUST HOW GOOD IS THAT FOR OUR COUNTRY?

In my lifetime, after serving in uniform for President’s Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, and Bush I have a pretty good feel for which party supported our military, and what military life was like under each of their terms. And, let me assure you that times were best under the Republicans. Service under Jimmy Carter was devastating for all branches of the military. And, Ronald Regan was truly a salvation. You can choose to listen to enriched newscasters, and foolish people like John Murtha (he is no war hero), Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Michael Moore, Jane Fonda, Harry Reid, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and on-and-on to include the true fools in Hollywood if you like. If you do, your conclusions will be totally wrong.

The reason that I write, appear on radio talk shows, and do everything I can to denounce those people is simple. THEY ARE PUTTING THEIR THURST FOR POLITICAL POWER AND QUEST FOR VICTORY IN 2008 ABOVE WHAT IS BEST FOR THIS COUNTRY. I cannot abide that. Pelosi clearly defied the Logan Act by going to Syria, which should have lead to imprisonment of three years and a heavy fine. Jane Fonda did more to prolong the Vietnam War than any other human being (as acknowledge by Ho Chi Minh in his writing before he died). She truly should have been indicted for treason, along with her radical husband Tom Hayden, and forced to pay the consequences.

This country has started to soften by not enforcing its laws, which is another indication of a Republic about to fall. All Democrats, along with the Hollywood elite, are sending us headlong into a total defeat in the Middle East, which will finally give Iran total dominance in the region. A lack of oil in the near future will be the final straw that dooms this Republic. However, if we refuse to let this happen and really get serious about an energy self-sufficiency program, this can be avoided.

I am afraid, however, that we are going in the opposite direction. If we elect Hillary Clinton and a Democrat controlled congress, and they carry through with allowing Iran to take control of the Middle East, continue to refuse development of nuclear energy, refuse to allow drilling for new oil, and continue to do nothing but oppose everything Bush, it will be over in terms of what we view as the good life in the USA.

[Editor: The above text is from a Google html version, the below text is from the PDF file that completes the essay.]

Now, do I think that all who do not support the war are un-American---of course not. They just do not understand the importance of total victory in that region. Another failure of George Bush is his inability to explain to the American people why we are there, and why we MUST win. By the way, it is not a war. The war was won four years ago. It is martial law that is under attack by Iranian and Syrian outside influences, and there is a difference.

So, what do I believe? What is the bottom line? I will simply say that the Democratic Party has fielded the foulest, power hungry, anti-country, self absorbed group of individuals that I have observed in my lifetime. Our educational system is partially to blame for allowing the mass of America to be taken in by this group. George Bush has done the best he can with the disabilities that he possesses. A President must communicate with the people. And, I would tell you that Desert Storm spoiled the people. Bush Senior’s 100-hour war convinced the people that technology has progressed to the point that wars could be fought with no casualties and won in very short periods of time. I remember feeling at the time, that this was a tragedy for the US military. To win wars, you must put boots on the ground. When you put boots on the ground, soldiers are going to die. A President must make the war decision wisely, and insure that the cause is right before using his last political option. However, CONTROLLING IRAN AND DEMOCRATIZING THE MIDDLE EAST IS THE ONLY CHOICE IF WE ARE HELL-BENT ON DEPENDING ON THEM FOR OUR FUTURE ENERGY NEEDS.

Jimmy L. Cash, Brig. Gen., USAF, Ret.
jcash1@bresnan.net
Lakeside, Montana 59922

Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi are on the retreat!

According to Melanie Morgan of MoveAmericaForward, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid appear to be backing off from their “immediate” cut-n-run sentiments:

Harry Reid & Nancy Pelosi are on the retreat!

A brand new Move America Forward television commercial is being released today that criticizes House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for their surrender/retreat/withdrawal proposals with regard to Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war against Islamic terrorism.

Today Reid & Pelosi reportedly backed away from their demands of an immediate withdrawal and surrender in Iraq, after feeling the heat from so many patriotic Americans like yourself.

And now we're going to push even harder to get our leaders to stand firmly behind our troops AND THEIR MISSIONS. (MoveAmericaForward Email 5-22-07)

I have not corroborated Melanie Morgan’s belief that Reid and Pelosi are backing off; nonetheless Morgan attributes the success to MoveAmericaForward ads that have resulted in Americans writing to the Democratic Party Leftists.

You can see that latest ad at YouTube HERE. [* Same Ad posted at the top.]

Servicemen (women) are Family Heroes

There is a good chance you know someone from your past or present that has served in the United States military. Today that military is an ALL voluntary operation. No American has been drafted for service since the end of the Viet Nam War.

You and I both know that there are military personnel that do not like what they do even though they signed up for service. I am here to tell you that is the exception rather than the rule; however even in a dislike for job most of even the disheartened do their job with the spirit of professionalism.

There are far more serviceman which are proud to serve their nation. They also perform their job with in the spirit of professionalism. Whether unhappy or happy in their duty they are all American heroes and should be treated with the utmost respect for putting their lives on the line for the Liberty and Freedom Americans enjoy today.

Think about that as you watch this YouTube video.

Iran Boldly Captures British Sailors

So Iran has kidnapped British sailors under sketchy circumstances as to whose waters belonged to whom.

The U.N. Security Council is supposed to take action on yet another moment of Iran ignoring compliance to uranium enrichment.

Since Iran has ignored the Security Council for over a year without meaningful action, does Britain think that Iran will just lie down and turn over its sailors?

If Iran thumbs its nose at the British as I suspect, how will the British respond? Will the Brits get a justified burr in their back or will the Brits slip into appeasement and offer everything including the kitchen sink to get their sailors home?

America must react as well, however America must await the British reaction. What will America do if the Brits show courage? Will the Democrats force Bush to abandon our staunchest European ally? If the Brits take the appeasement route, will America simply shake their head in disbelief and wait how circumstances unfold?

Either way, Iran has drawn a line and is daring the West to cross it.

Hezbollah Will Walk into Israel Without Armed Struggle

So you think that Middle Eastern media outlets and Mohammedan organizations (i.e. murdering Islamofascist terrorists) are moderate and peaceful? Well think again!

Abdallah Safialdeen representing Hezbollah in Iran claims that as soon as the US military leaves Iraq, Hezbollah will waltz into “Palestine” (i.e. the Land Israel). The Jews will either leave with America or be obliterated.

READ ABOUT IT HERE.

Murtha’s Slow Bleed Strategy

Murtha’s “Slow Bleed Strategy” is aimed at stopping the Troop Surge, however what it really does is exact a demeanor of defeat and places the Troops in Iraq in harms way by holding back funds that provide equipment that protect our soldiers.

Does anyone see the irony? Not too long ago the Democrats were castigating President Bush for not planning well enough for soldiers to have the proper equipment for protection of our soldiers, now Murtha is attempting to make soldier safety an uncertainty in his crusade to administer a defeat for America in Iraq.

JRH
******************************

Stop the Pelosi-Murtha 'Slow Bleed' Today

Republican National Committee
E-Newsletter 8:32 AM 2/22/07
Mike Duncan, Chairman Republican National Committee

Last week, I wrote to you about the Democrat 'slow bleed' strategy for Iraq. Proposed by John Murtha, 'slow bleed' would do exactly what it sounds like: gradually take away the resources our men and women need to fight the terrorists in Iraq. It would limit reinforcements, and possibly even close the bases that offer support and shelter for our troops. The Democrats had hoped to keep the 'slow bleed' plan under the radar by adding it onto other bills, but now even the liberal press are reporting on the story.

A Washington Post editorial last Saturday described the Murtha 'slow bleed' plan as "crudely hamstringing the ability of military commanders to deploy troops" and went on to say this: "Mr. Murtha's cynicism is matched by an alarming ignorance about conditions in Iraq. He continues to insist that Iraq 'would be more stable with us out of there,' in spite of the consensus of U.S. intelligence agencies that early withdrawal would produce 'massive civilian casualties.' He says he wants to force the administration to 'bulldoze' the Abu Ghraib prison, even though it was emptied of prisoners and turned over to the Iraqi government last year. He wants to 'get our troops out of the Green Zone' because 'they are living in Saddam Hussein's palace'; could he be unaware that the zone's primary occupants are the Iraqi government and the U.S. Embassy? It would be nice to believe that Mr. Murtha does not represent the mainstream of the Democratic Party or the thinking of its leadership. Yet when asked about Mr. Murtha's remarks Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered her support."

Even the liberal columnist E.J. Dionne criticized the Murtha 'slow bleed' plan, saying that "the sense that the proposal has been crafted in part for reasons of political convenience and the intricate restrictions it would place on the military are precisely what could doom it."

Those are exactly the reasons 'slow bleed' should be doomed, and we need your help to do it:

· Write a letter to your editor or call in to talk radio today condemning the Democrat 'slow bleed' strategy.

· And then call your Congressman or Senator and tell them not to support a plan that would leave our brave men and women in harm's way without adequate resources to protect themselves.

The Murtha 'slow bleed' strategy is a dishonest and dangerous response to the challenges we face in Iraq. Together, we can and we must stop Congress from passing the Murtha plan.

Sincerely,

Mike Duncan Chairman, Republican National Committee

Paid for by the Republican National Committee Not Authorized By Any Candidate Or Candidate's Committee - http://www.gop.com/

WHO CARES ABOUT THE MILITARY?

You know I am certain there are those in the military who are unhappy with President Bush if for no other reason that they are in the military and in a foreign nation risking their lives.

I have to tell you though, most of the live coverage of I find showing soldiers are that of those dedicated to the mission at hand. Of course America rarely sees that side of the military. That is a heinous omission by the Mainstream Media (MSM). The MSM often will show scandal and even give it more weight than the reality because of the MSM hatred of President George W. Bush.

I have to tell you I am not extremely happy with W currently either, however it is for different reasons that the MSM or the Slanted Left Democrats would give you. My unhappiness stems from Bush bending more to the wishes of the Democrats than toward ultimate victory in the Middle East. But that is another story.

Retired Lt. Col. Oliver North at a Fox Blog gives a profile of the American soldier.

Kerry Belittles U.S. Troops

SEE KERRY BELITTLE TROOPS

Senator Kerry is an example of what to expect if the Democrats win one or both Houses of Congress. Kerry and the Democrats will simply lose the war because they consider the brave men and women of the military to be dummies.

That is right folks, Kerry believes if you don't get an education will you go to Iraq. That is a typical anti-Vietnam statement moving to the 21st Century. Those who wished to avoid the draft in the 1960's and 1970's tried many games: homosexuality, Canada, or academics. Kerry gave a speech in California indicating the same old line: do well in school or go to Iraq.

The implication is only dummies sign up for the Service. One thing, there is no Draft today. A second thing, the military recruits just as heavily from colleges as they do from High Schools.