skip to main |
skip to sidebar
But NO Outcry to Prosecute the Scoundrels
John R. Houk
© August 29, 2009
Here is an alert from ACT! For America concerning the hypocrisy of the Left toward America’s National Security.
The ACLU took clandestine photos of covert CIA agents involved with extracting information from Gitmo Islamic terrorists. The Washington Post reported on the now public photos. It is interesting there are no cries to prosecute the ACLU for endangering the identities of covert CIA agents.
Let’s preface this alert with a little memory lane.
First there is the Plamegate scandal in which the Left was calling for Presidential impeachment and/or the clearing of the unpopular Bush Administration staffers. The Left MSM accused a leak coming directly from the White House divulging that Valerie Plame the wife of State Department hack Joe Wilson worked for the CIA.
Can you remember the LEFTIST OMG that the Bush Administration would leak information about the existence of a “covert” CIA operative out of vengeance for Joe Wilson’s hack report about Niger yellow cake and Saddam Hussein?
There was even screaming for a Special Prosecutor. That turned out to be Leftist bloodhound Patrick Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald went after everyone until he latched onto the rumor that Vice President Dick Cheney’s Chief of Staff Scooter Libby allegedly divulged Plame’s information to the public.
After millions of dollars of taxpayer money Fitzgerald came up with bupkis. Evidently Fitzgerald needed some kind of justification for his license to the Leftist bidding of disrupting the Bush Administration.
So Fitzgerald’s million dollar staff poured over the ‘under oath’ statements provided to the Special Persecutor.
There was STILL no smoking gun linking anyone in the Bush/Cheney staff to outing not really so-covert Valerie Plame. Who knows how many times the statements taken received scouring until a new strategy to persecute someone among the Bush/Cheney staff?
Here is the confirmation that Fitzgerald ALREADY KNEW who released Plame’s name to the press? It was an anti-Bush Republican then working in the Defense Department, specifically Richard Armitage.
I guess it was not worth going after an anti-Bush Republican for Armitage never received a public “We gotcha” from Fitzgerald.
The new strategy entailed looking for statements that did not match from each individual under oath. Apparently Scooter Libby was the only person high enough for Fitzgerald to destroy. Libby was indicted for perjury.
Evidently it was more of a Federal crime to not remember recollections than it was for a sitting President to specifically get lying via DNA. Libby was indicted and convicted. Go figure! President Clinton perjured himself about sex with a White House intern and was impeached, but was found innocent by the then dominated Democratic Party Senate. Equal justice definitely was not spread out between the Left and the Right.
O yes, one other thing. Special Persecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent millions of taxpayer dollars and did not convict one person for his Special Prosecutor mandate to find and prosecute anyone placing CIA operatives in mortal danger for revealing their cover. Fitzgerald’s lone conviction was a lame perjury verdict over memories that had to do with meetings and little to do with insignificant Valerie Plame.
Here is the ACT! For America email alert sent to me on 08/28/2009 01:56 PM :
Political Correctness Can Be Deadly
Political correctness can be annoying, frustrating, even exasperating.
But sometimes it can be deadly.
The commentary below [Editor: Michelle Malkin commentary link] exposes what can only be described as an infuriating excess of political correctness that will not only compromise our war against Islamist terrorism — it may cost people their lives.
The ACLU, in its obsession to put the “rights” of alleged terrorists ahead of law-abiding citizens and CIA agents, has been caught surreptitiously photographing CIA agents in order to show their pictures to alleged terrorists the ACLU is defending.
By doing so the ACLU has put these agents’ lives at risk in what appears to us to be an obvious violation of federal law, such as The Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982.
Will the Justice Department properly investigate the ACLU? We hope so.
But given Attorney General Eric Holder’s recent wrong-headed decision to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate interrogation actions by CIA interrogators, it’s difficult not to conclude that Holder’s sympathies lie more with the ACLU than they do with safeguarding the lives of Americans and CIA agents.
Many experts and observers are concluding that the direction the Justice Department is going will ultimately undermine our intelligence gathering as interrogators, fearful they may eventually be prosecuted, will choose to avoid any tactic that even remotely could be interpreted as “excessive.” How many terrorist plots will thus not be foiled, and how many people will die as a result? Only time will tell.
One of the interrogation practices that is being questioned is the blowing of cigar smoke in the face of an alleged terrorist. Can anyone outside of the anti-American left, the ACLU, and Eric Holder honestly believe that blowing cigar smoke in the face of a terrorist is “excessive,” or worse than the ACLU photographing CIA agents to show their pictures to terrorists?
This goes beyond absurd. This goes beyond political correctness run amok.
America, we must rise up against this insanity.
JRH 8/29/09
The hypocrisy of President Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrats and the Left in general is showing. A blog post at American Thinker shines the light on BHO doing the very thing that he specifically criticized President GW Bush.
BHO has signed a Bill for a military budget with an executive note attached stipulating the portions he feels are unconstitutional because it interferes with the Constitutional authority of the Executive Branch.
JRH 6/28/09
Here is a classic example of hypocrisy in the Democratic Party. There is a mountain of evidence that Rep. Jack Murtha was involved in political corruption (and other Democrats by the way) with the lobbying of the PMA Group ran by Paul Magliocchetti.
More than 100 House members secured earmarks in a major spending bill for clients of a single lobbying firm -- The PMA Group -- known for its close ties to John P. Murtha, the congressman in charge of Pentagon appropriations.
"It shows you how good they were," said Keith Ashdown, chief investigator at the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. "The sheer coordination of that would take an army to finish."
PMA's offices have been raided, and the firm closed its political action committee last week amid reports that the FBI is investigating possibly illegal campaign contributions to Murtha and other lawmakers.
No matter what the outcome of the federal investigation, PMA's earmark success illustrates how a well-connected lobbying firm operates on Capitol Hill. And earmark accountability rules imposed by the Democrats in 2007 make it possible to see how extensively PMA worked the Hill for its clients.
In the spending bill managed by Murtha, the fiscal 2008 Defense appropriation, 104 House members got earmarks for projects sought by PMA clients, according to Congressional Quarterly's analysis of a database constructed by Ashdown's group. (Yahoo News)
So check this out: the key Congressman linked to the PMA Group’s lobbying corruption is Jack Murtha the Democrat from Pennsylvania.
This is the same Jack Murtha that called American Marines cold blooded killers at the so-called Haditha Massacre. The last time I checked all but two of the Marines accused of wrong doing have been totally exonerated. The highest ranking officer in the incident Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani had his charges initially dropped; however the now Leftist controlled U.S. government is still seeking validation and has called for a dismissal of the three-judge dismissal in order for the entire panel of nine judges to re-hear the case. The final accused Haditha Marine is Staff Sergeant Frank D. Wuterich and his fate awaits prosecution persecution of Lt. Col. Chessani.
This same Jack Murtha implicated in the Abscam FBI investigations in which a fake Arab was bribing politicians to put them in the pocket of the fake Arab. This indicates that Murtha is no rookie when it comes to money and political corruption.
Yet the Democratic Party continues to prop up Rep. Jack Murtha. It is cosmically unbelievable. Why isn’t President Obama stepping in to chastise Murtha and call for Congress to proceed with an ethics investigation? The reason is an ethics investigation would gut the House of Representatives led by liar Pelosi of the Democratic Party. That is how many Democrats that also are connected to the lobbying efforts of the PMA Group and Jack Murtha.
JRH 5/19/09
Apparently a unilateral cease-fire vote is about to place with the Israel Security Council for a ten day truce with Hamas.
The word is “unilateral” because as usual the concerned Arab States and the West want Israel to cease fire without any reciprocal commitment from Hamas.
Hamas vows to keep shooting missiles as long as the Israel Defense Forces are in Gaza as if Hamas did not shoot missiles before the IDF was used to punish Hamas for shooting at Israeli civilian targets.
I also read that Foreign Minister (and current head of Kadima) Tzipi Livni said Israel would resume military activities if Hamas continues missile attacks.
I thus sense if the Israel Security Council signs a unilateral cease-fire, it will be either a worthless scrap of paper in which Hamas will shoot more rockets or Hamas will use ten days to re-arm to continue its agenda of murder and terror to wipe Israel off the planet.
I say if Israel signs a cease-fire as forced upon them by a variety Western Governments (and as brokered by the USA and/or Egypt) any sign of re-arming or missile activity should be publicly hailed for Israel to eradicate Hamas from Gaza.
Of course the useless supposed organization of world peace – the U.N. – is outraged that Israel keeps shelling their enemies who are not signing into the cease-fire themselves.
Then the AP typically inserts a Gazan victimization story of an IDF shell landing in their kitchen and the poor Gazans (who incidentally are nearly 100% behind Hamas terrorism) are trapped in their homes.
If this was Ireland instead of the Middle East, the word “blarney” comes to mind.
JRH 1/17/09
Ann Coulter is at one her wittiest best in frying Democrats, Leftists and the Obama campaign relating to religion, Governor Palin and lies.
As you read Obama: Lucifer is my Homeboy keep this in mind. Lucifer equals Satan who is also the devil. Jesus said the devil is the father of lies.
Man that fits the Democratic Party and Leftist smear operatives to a tee.
JRH 9/18/o8
Erick Erickson of Redstate.com has sent an e-list email encouraging his readers to protest to Congress about Larry Lessig of Google and Barack Obama.
His complaint is threefold.
1. Larry Lessig is pro-Net Neutrality.
2. Larry Lessig is virulently anti-Christian and moves Google in that direction.
3. Lessig is a huge political supporter of Obama; thus Obama has another guilt by association by allowing Lessig’s support of his campaign.
I am not sure if I understand Erickson’s anger about Lessig being for Net Neutrality. Net Neutrality is like the sun, it shines its light on the good and evil at the same time. Net Neutrality certainly allows the evil in this world to exploit a form of communication; however Net Neutrality offers the same exact ability for good to be on the Internet.
I am guessing Erickson’s ire is because Google under Lessig’s direction may be guilty of not allowing pro-Christian websites to be accessed via the Google search engine. If the allegation is true (and I don’t doubt that it is), then Lessig’s defense of Net Neutrality is Leftist hypocrisy. In essence Lessig is promoting Leftwing pro-Mohammedan websites and ridiculing Christ and Christian websites as well as definitely NOT providing neutrality for all users of the Google search engine.
This is a revelation that saddens me. I like using the Google search engine. Unfortunately I am finding out when I place a search for some Christian specific information, Google may be biased as a guide.
Then there is Barack Obama. Obama openly receives support from anti-Christian Lessig. Could this further expose light on Obama’s other associations with Nation of Islam racist Louis Farrakhan and Black Supremacist Christian Jeremiah Wright?
Couple this with Obama’s recent denigration of Pennsylvania rural dwellers (ergo all rural dwellers) as ignorant gun-toting individuals that rely on religion for solace on and comfort and what do you have a picture of?
It is a picture of an anti-Christian candidate running for the Democratic nomination for President.
JRH
************************
Obama Adviser Denigrates Jesus. Don't let him get away with it.
Redstate.com Email Alert
Erick Erickson
April 21, 2008 7:04:14 AM
ACTION ITEM: Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee at 202-224-5115 and protest Larry Lessig and Google denigrating Christ while Google censors Christians online. Details below.
A friend and adviser to Barack Obama, Larry Lessig, is going to testify before Congress on Tuesday to advocate for "net neutrality," a position strongly supported by Google,Inc.
Google, recently allowed Larry Lessig to talk to Google employees. During his talk, Lessig showed a video of Jesus, depicted as gay and wearing a diaper singing the song "I Will Survivor" until Christ is run over by a bus. You can see for yourself here.
Lessig told Google's employees, "This is a little bit touchy to some people. I don't get it, so just chill."
Google and Lessig believe that intellectual property rights should be curtailed and internet providers should be forced to allow anyone and everyone to use their networks.
While Google is pushing net neutrality and blaspheming Christ, Google is also censoring Christians online. As I document here, Google has censored a pro-life group online. Google has also been sued for anti-Christian discrimination in the United Kingdom.
Of course, while Google is happy to censor Christians while denigrating Christ, Google has gone out of its way to censor content that might offend muslims.
Google should have no right to demand open access to your internet while censoring and denigrating Christians on its network. And the Senate should not give Larry Lessig a platform to advocate Google's position while Google behaves in that manner.
Call the U.S. Senate Commerce Committee and tell them you find it disgraceful that Google could advocate an open internet while censoring Christians and laughing while Larry Lessig denigrates Christ. The number is 202-224-5115.
Also, please forward this to your friends. Have your friends join this list. We should not let the left get away with denigrating Christ and sending those who do to Congress to advocate for companies that routinely censor Christians.
Together, we can stop this.
All the best,
Erick Erickson Editor, RedState.com
Forward This Email to a Friend
Many of you that read this website probably writes or blogs at more than one place. I know I do. I also post at various social network blogs to get a feel for the feed back of that which I post or write. It is amazing how I am a hero at one social network and considered a pariah at another.
Anyway I was given a heads up from a Vox social blogger (United States Military Men and Women of Valor) about a blog post from a person that calls himself The Historian and his blog The Real World. The Historian also has a blog of the same name at Blogspot.
The post you have just got to read is about taxes. To be more precise, it is the hypocrisy of the Leftist Democrats who call for more taxes to collectively share America’s wealth for the poor and Middle America.
Here is the hypocrisy: Ironically there is as many wealthy Democrats as there are Republicans. In fact “The Historian” believes most of America’s wealthy elite are Leftist Democrats rather than Republicans. When it comes to wealth, the rich elitist protect their wealth just on the same scale that wealthy Republicans do. The hypocrisy is that Leftist rich Democrats call for a distribution of wealth via taxation; however the tax payer is Middle America and NOT wealthy Leftists any more than wealthy Republicans.
READ THE ESSAY.
JRH 4/19/08
Caroline Glick has written an essay castigating the United Nations Human Rights Council for voting 32-0 with every single European nation on the Council abstaining. What was the UNHRC vote about?
Whoever the dhimmi global monitor on Freedom of Expression is to report to the UNHRC about perceived instances when Freedom of Speech is abused relating to race or religion.
Hmm … Since the UNHRC is dominated by dictatorships and Mohammedan and/or Arab nations, I wonder what the UNHRC had in mind.
DUH! Glick clarifies the implications of the UNHRC vote if you cannot guess!
JRH 4/7/08
Bob Parks addresses Nancy Pelosi (and sort of the rest of the Dem fringe) in an open letter finger pointing tirade. Maybe “tirade” is not the best description because Parks is writing the truth about the Democratic Party attitude of “See no evil, Speak no evil and Hear no evil.”
I say Sick’em Parks!
JRH 12/18/07 (Hat tip ccpga Yahoo Group)
********************
Dissenter of The House
Bob Parks, Featured Writer
December 17, 2007
The New Media Journal
To the "Honorable" Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Democrat, California:
As a citizen of the United States of America, I find your comments today beyond insulting. Your competence to hold the hallowed office of House Speaker should be questioned.
During a press conference today, you said of Republicans...
"They like this war. They want this war to continue."
Let me be clear: No Republican I know "likes" war. I know of no Republican that woke up this morning, happy in the knowledge that someone, somewhere in the world, was the latest casualty of a war.
It's not anyone's fault but your own that the current climate on Capitol Hill is as acidic as it is today. Like the cowboy you, and many in your party, have accused President Bush of being, you came into the reigns of power declaring the end of "business as usual". What the American people have seen is exactly that, and more.
What is most reprehensible about your remarks is your continued LIE, (that's right, I said it), LIE that the Iraq war was one you never condoned or authorized. You, and many like you, continue to assert that we were brought into this war by some sadistic figment of George W. Bush's imagination.
You, and many like you, claim that the president got us into this war via manufactured intelligence. Some of your supporters state that Vice President Cheney was also responsible for this faulty intel. You go to those supporters and continue to LIE to them. They, in turn, repeat those lies, and your statement that Republicans "like this war" is the culmination. I contend we would have never been attacked on 9/11 in the first place if the very people you support, and have supported, did their jobs defending our country in the first place.
But to imply that Republicans created this war out of some warped sense of machismo proves that you are either a liar or delusional.
The reason we went to war with Iraq is because there were clear links between Saddam Hussein, terror, and the 9/11 attack.
Some of us will not let our nation (and the world) forget that on December 16, 1998, two years before George W. Bush became president, and while the current president William Jefferson Clinton had authorized air strikes against Iraq, you, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, issued a statement that in part read...
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.
"The responsibility of the United States in this conflict is to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, to minimize the danger to our troops and to diminish the suffering of the Iraqi people. The citizens of Iraq have suffered the most for Saddam Hussein's activities; sadly, those same citizens now stand to suffer more. I have supported efforts to ease the humanitarian situation in Iraq and my thoughts and prayers are with the innocent Iraqi civilians, as well as with the families of U.S. troops participating in the current action.
"I believe in negotiated solutions to international conflict. This is, unfortunately, not going to be the case in this situation where Saddam Hussein has been a repeat offender, ignoring the international community's requirement that he come clean with his weapons program. While I support the President, I hope and pray that this conflict can be resolved quickly and that the international community can find a lasting solution through diplomatic means."
I only present your words because many of your supporters today say that President Bush concocted the whole notion of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq as a reason to go to war. Again, George W. Bush was the governor of Texas at the time. YOU were a member of the House Intelligence Committee. YOU had "intelligence" in 1998 that you seemed comfortable enough with at that time.
You never told President Clinton to "calm down". You never said about President Clinton what you told the press about Republicans today….
"We thought that they shared the view of so many people in our country that we needed a new direction in Iraq. But the Republicans have made it very clear that this is not just George Bush's war. This is the war of the Republicans in Congress."
You never referred to President Clinton's long distance, cruise missile strikes as "his" war.
Let's not forget, as you seem to have, we did not start this war. There was a link between Iraq and 9/11. As a former member of the House Intelligence Committee, you should have known that the previously "waterboarded" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, called the "mastermind' of the 9/11 and other terror attacks worldwide, was actually an Iraqi intelligence agent. He could not, and would not, take action without the approval and blessing of Saddam Hussein.
Is that not a link, Madame Speaker?
Our young men and women have volunteered to go and fight this war, so the very people you deem less evil than Republicans, will not strip you of your seat of power, and condemn you to a private life in hijab hell. What they are doing takes what many of you on Capitol Hill refer to as "courage."
You could learn something from them.
___________________
Bob Parks is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal, a member/writer for the National Advisory Council of Project 21, VP of Marketing and Media Relations/Staff Writer for the New Media Alliance, and VP of the Massachusetts Republican Assembly and host of the Outside the Wire radio program on the Intel Radio Network.
The New Media Journal.us © 2007
I like Ann Coulter because she is Conservative who is not afraid to rock the Politically Correct boat. In her latest column Coulter not only takes on the hypocrisy of the Left’s tendency to promote an image of multicultural tolerance while disdaining Conservatives as all things evil and Christianity as an old myth which only the unintelligent still follow; Coulter makes a stab at the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as a Leftist organization.
The launching pad for Coulter’s venom toward the ADL is because the ADL has attacked Dennis Prager (a Jewish individual) for his anti-Islamist stand.
The only criticism I have of Coulter’s column is the appearance of sympathy for the implied criticism of the ADL of Senator Robert Byrd’s racist past. Byrd was a card carrying and recruiting member of the Klu Klux Klan in old West Virginia. (Read a Conservatives view of Byrd’s KKK past HERE and the Slanted Left View of Byrd’s KKK past HERE.) Coulter may be expressing tongue-in-cheek however it is odd even in that way to show sympathy for a slanted Left aged Democrat with a racist past.
Otherwise Coulter’s analogies are right on piercing of Leftist hypocrisy with the reality of truth. Apparently the ADL has become so Left wing it is more concerned with Leftist ideology than with the survival of the existence of the Land of Israel, a Land that owes its modern existence to the butchery of Hitler’s Nazi/Fascist Holocaust.
Can you name the primary goal of Islamofascism? Its goal is the execution of a second Holocaust of Jews, particularly the ones living Israel.
Here is some poop on the Democratic Party front runner Hillary Clinton. As you know Leftist Democrats including Hillary Clinton wish to protect the privacy of terrorists and terrorist supporters and terrorist sympathizers. The Democrats and Hillary have painted a picture of President Bush as evil with privacy issues in which the Administration practices of Security have prevented another 9/11 style attack from occurring on American soil.
We can couple this loser attitude with hypocrisy. Hillary listened to audio recordings of illegally intercepted mobile phone conversations of Clinton political opponents.
The image projected by Hillary is that the government cannot on spy on suspected Americans treasonously doing something for America’s enemies in a time of War yet it is perfectly fine to listen to political opponents private conversations to get poop to smear the opponent’s reputation or plan an agenda to disable a political opponents strategy.
Is this “do as I say, not as I do” Leftist the kind of person America wishes to have as its President?
JRH (Hat tip to: dox ^ 2.)
.JPG)
Peter Schweizer is a Slanted Right person’s favorite thorn in the neck of hypocritical Liberals. He is the noted author of “Do As I Say (Not As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.” That book is a documentation of Liberals and Democrats that advocate altruistic causes yet violate the end game of the altruistic cause constantly.
I guess the latest Liberal hypocrisy is similar to Papal Indulgences used in the Middle Ages. The Papacy used the practice of Indulgences to sell Grace/Forgiveness to the buyer or for a dead person a buyer wanted assurance to score Heaven as a revenue venture.
This practice became so blatantly outrageous by Martin Luther’s day that he became emboldened to nail the famous “95 Theses” on the Chapel door of the University whence Luther taught in 1517. This marked the beginning of the Reformation and a separation of protesting Roman Catholic Christians from the Papal Authority of the Roman Catholic Church. Hence the emergence of multi-dimensional articles of faith that all had one thing in common – divestment of the authority of the Pope and the appellation of Protestant. The Protestants were calling Papal practices hypocritical because of divergence from forgiveness of Sins by repentance and accepting Jesus Christ as Savior. The Protestant accusation is that obvious sinners and unsure Christians could buy Salvation apart from the Redemptive Resurrection of Jesus Christ. This was pretty bold stuff for the day.
Twenty-first century Liberals have embarked on a similar path of hypocritical indulgences. It is called “Offsetting.” For example when a Liberal living in the real world drives a car or flies a Jet that pollutes the environment of the earth, they can offset their environmental sin by planting a tree or donating money to environmental activist organizations. Thus they have neutralized their environmental sin – over and over again as they participate in the reality of life. In this way a Liberal can delude themselves of their goodness and publicly heap shame on those who choose work in the real life and dream their goodness by self-made illusions.
Peter Schweizer hammers this home in an essay written in an USA Today Opinion Column. I sense a Liberal would dread to read the essay because it might dash the illusion under the light of reality. A Slanted Right person should read the essay to confront the hypocrisy the next time a deluded Liberal attempts to embarrass you in front of friends, family or co-workers with facts they themselves participate daily.
Frankly I have never heard of Senator Larry Craig until the Mainstream Media (MSM) decided to take a huge interest in Craig’s guilty plea to a misdemeanor of a sex crime act in a public bathroom.
My first thought was, “Here is another Republican the MSM will enjoy skewering and humiliating.” My second thought was, “If Craig indeed is a homosexual yet condemned homosexuality and same sex laws; he should resign to get his life together to match his rhetoric.”
Then I read Ann Coulter’s article about all the hullabaloo and changed some of my thinking. Not all of my thinking, but some of my thinking.
I still think Craig should resign even if copping to a guilty plea was a legal mistake. Obviously there are some kind of hijinks going on in the personal life of Craig that reflects badly on moral issues most Conservatives support and do not support.
On the other hand the way the Slanted Left leaning MSM castigated Craig for hypocrisy is hypocrisy in itself. The Left is usually very supportive of homosexual rights and should have commended the old boy (according to their ideology) to formally pleading guilty to homosexual antics in a public bathroom. I mean if it was a Democrat of Left Wing bureaucrat the MSM would have hammered on the so-called civil right to be a homosexual.
Let’s read Ann Coulter’s take:
Over the past weeks there has been a crisis created by the Mohammedans controlling the Mosques on the Temple Mount. The deal is the Israeli government is rebuilding an ancient bridge that was damaged by an earthquake and a snow storm. The WAQF that has the Mohammedan authority over the heathen Mosques on the Holy Temple Mount raised Cain that Jewish construction was too close to a Mosque. This has led to stone throwing by Mohammedans (youth and adult alike) while preparation for bridge building was occurring.
The Israel Antiquities Authority is taking the time to do some archaeological digging for when the bridge is built, the opportunity to look at Jewish history will end for some time.
Now the Mohammedans are all up in arms about the archaeological dig. This is an example of Mohammedan duplicity! The WAQF received a permit to build an exit from a subterranean Mosque below the Temple Mount in the 1990’s; however the WAQF used the permit to begin an extensive building program which trashed Jewish antiquities that were below the Temple.
READ MORE!
.JPG)
Posts
