skip to main |
skip to sidebar
.JPG)
I recently wrote that the West has to get medieval with the medieval minded radical Mohammedans. The only way to get the Islamofascists (rogue nations and non-entity terrorists) is to instill fear in their hearts.
The West has had to do this several times in history to get Mohammedans to back off. At Tours/Poitier Charles (the Hammer) Martel beat back Mohammedans in what is now France. Inspired by El Cid (much of his exploits are legend), the Spanish began the Reconquista of Christian Land exploited by Mohammedan Moors.
The Crusades was a defensive action inculcated with Roman Catholic largesse to get the Mohammedans to stop raids on the European side of the Mediterranean. Evidently the Mohammedans would slip into Christian towns to rape, pillage, take booty and kidnap people for slavery. Thus the Crusades embarked for two hundred years until the Mohammedans unfortunately got the upper hand.
Ottoman Turks ravished the Capital of the Eastern Roman Empire that had been whittled down to the city kingdom of Constantinople of the once mighty Byzantine Empire. From Constantinople the Ottomans ravaged Eastern Europe making it all the way to the Gates of Vienna and finally stopped by Polish King Jan Sobieski in 1683. The Europeans push the Ottomans back to what once was Yugoslavia and Greece.
The brave Greeks revolted in 1821 - 1832 and had their freedom restored. Former Yugoslavia became broken up by those loyal to Christianity and those that chose conversion above suppression by Mohammedans.
The end of WWI became the end of any actual military power base of the Mohammedans as Turkey surrendered and lost their empire over Arab lands to the south and Slavic lands to the north. The bloodlust of Turkish Mohammedans had not abated though. Just before the Turkish involvement ended in WWI, they forced marched Armenian Christians outside of Turkey slaughtering tens of thousands Armenians along the way.
And now Radical Mohammedans influenced by a Sunni Wahhabi sect in Saudi Arabia and a Shi’ite radicals in Iran are attempting to restore the past via terrorism and oil money. The West needs to find another Charles the Hammer, an El Cid and a Jan Sobieski to diminish Mohammedan designs once again.
Alan Caruba fills in some historical holes that are there due to my brevity: READ IT.
The Sunday Times of London has revealed that Israel is preparing military plans to utilize precision low yield nuclear strikes on Iranian nuclear targets.
Wow!
I will let you read the details that the Times revealed. I wish to talk about the consequences and potential benefits of such a military adventure.
First let us consider propaganda. Ahmadinejad has frequently and often been saying that Israel will be wiped of the map while simultaneously bragging about Iran’s nuclear progress. One does not have to be a math genius to add two plus two equals four. Israel’s calculations needs to weigh is Ahmadinejad an evil maniacal Islamofascist leader or is he merely posture with propaganda to enable Iran to be a military power in the Middle East.
If Ahmadinejad is a maniac, then it is simple addition: two plus two equals four.
If Ahmadinejad is posturing to be a regional power to deal with in the Middle East, then the equation is a bit more complicated with yet to be known variables that will end with a global answer.
If Israel’s calculations are based on simple math, then Israel may be leaking their intentions to have Ahmadinejad or his Ayatollah elders soften their public stand as well as open the Iranian so-called peaceful nuclear program to unrestrained IAEA inspection. This would be a little tit-for-tat hard line propaganda between Israel and Iran. If Iran ups the ante in the propaganda, Israel may actually follow through unilaterally on their leaked information.
I say “unilaterally” because Israel is beginning to have the impression that the Bush Administration might become hamstrung by the Democratic Party dominated U.S. Congress. This means Israel feels alone in battling for its existence. There is NO way Israel could allow an Islamofascist Iran to be armed with nuclear WMD. Israel (and I) believes that would lead to a 21st century Holocaust.
If Israel’s calculations are based on a more difficult equation, then Israel would have to think of the consequences of Jewish hatred fueled not only in the Middle East, but in the West as well. If anti-Semitism is growing now in the West, it could become huge if Israel uses nuclear weapons on a first strike basis. Such anti-Semitism could threaten Israel existentially as much as Iran wiping the Jewish State off of the map. If America abandons Israel due to a Slanted Left and Paleo-con strengthened anti-Israel political position, then Israel will in affect have zero powerful backers.
Let us next consider that Iran’s President Ahmadinejad anti-Semite war mongering words are not propaganda but rather the will of the ruling Ayatollah elites of Iran.
If the Bush Administration also believes that Ahmadinejad rhetoric is beginning to be a mixture of Twelver Shi’ite theology and political policy, then the American military may be positioning to aid Israel in striking Iranian nuclear sites. I say this because there has been speculation due to who is taking over CentCom over American forces in Iraq. Admiral William Fallon is the speculated replacement for retiring General Abizaid.
Do you catch this? A Navy man is replacing an Army man as Commander of Ground and Naval forces in the Iraq and Afghanistan area. There have also been additions to Carriers and Naval support vessels to the area. Hmm… Could there be a coordination of a military strike with Israel on Iran?
Is it possible that Bush senses that there will be no financial support to complete the job in Iraq and thus is willing to take a gamble on escalating engagement with Iran’s nuclear ambitions? There are indications that this might be the change of strategy that Bush is proceeding with.
Let us examine if Israel operates unilaterally without American help. Assuming Israel is successful on Times information on three targets; what will be the consequences for Israel? The repercussions could range from the extreme to the mild.
Of Iran has threatened it will unleash the full anger of terrorism on the West which will include disrupting the flow of oil to the West. Depending on the success in carrying out Iranian threats other Mohammedan nations may join; however there is the Sunni/Shi’ite conflict. Secretly Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi sect of the Sunni) may relish a diminishment of Iran, though I doubt the Saudis would express this glee publicly.
What happens if America acts unilaterally to strike Iranian nuclear sites? Probably same results that Israel experiences would be the outcome.
What happens if Israel and America act in tandem with precision strikes against Iran nuclear sites? Again the result of anger will be the same.
Europe is too cowardly to act.
Russia and China are too invested too act.
That leaves America and Israel. They might as well do something they have actually done in the past: a joint military precision military strike to set Iranian nuclear ambitions back. Let the consequences fall where they may.
I have always looked at the potential nuclear WMD of Iran as a disaster for the world. A nuclear armed Iran would place that Islamofascist-Messianic rogue nation in a place to extort the world with both oil (carrot) and the stick (WMD). It has the potential to make a bunch of Shi’ite camel jockeys looking to execute global chaos to bring the Twelfth Imam-Mahdi out of hiding to enslave the world to Mohammedanism. That has been my view of a nuclear Iran.
There is another view I had not considered. That is Israel’s view.
The very existence of a nuclear Iran would discourage Jews to immigrate to Israel and possibly encourage Jews living In Israel to immigrate somewhere else in the world. The fear of the Iranian proclamation to wipe Israel off the map would be the last straw for many Jews seeking a Jewish safe haven. That haven in which communities are overtly anti-Semitic would look better than a nuclear roasted Israel.
I cannot believe people are missing this! Ahmadinejad is a Shi'ite Twelver. The Twelver's are an extremist Mohammedans that believe if the world is pushed into a little chaos the lost hidden Imam of the past will return in the present as the MAHDI. The Mahdi will bring global Mohammedanism and defeat (for those of you who have not figured out what defeat means yet - KILL) the enemies of Allah (the false god of the false prophet Mohammed).
"Iran's president believes Allah has chosen him to prepare the world for the coming of an Islamic ‘savior’ called the Mahdi.
But before the Mahdi's return, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believes there must be global chaos – even if he has to create it himself."
It is this Twelver mentality that is going to create a global war:
"All Muslims await the appearance of the Mahdi; the largest branch of Shiites, those known as Twelvers, await his return. To the majority of Shiites, the Mahdi was the last of the prophet Muhammad's true heirs, his 12 righteous descendants chosen by God to lead the faithful. The Mahdi, the Twelfth Imam, the Imam of Our Times, was born Muhammad ibn Hasan and went into hiding around 878. Shiites believe he maintained contact with representatives until 941, when all communication from him ceased. When the time is ripe, they teach, he will reappear and, along with Jesus, will lead Muslims in a struggle to rid the world of corruption and establish justice."
Hello! Wake up!
David Frum, an AEI Resident Fellow, has written an essay that connects the geo-political dots to Iran. He does not specifically relate to the death-cult beliefs, he merely points in confusion to the obvious source of global disruption - Iran. If Iran is behind the Middle Eastern chaos that is occurring, I guarantee TWELVER theology is behind it. Look out for the nuke and chemical WMD to begin to emerge to enlarge the chaos. Ahmadinejad is looking for the Mahdi.
.JPG)
.jpg)
Posts
