More Obama Legitimacy News

Barack Hussein Obama has been sworn into the Office of President of the United States of America. Before that January 20th date there was marginal coverage of President Obama’s obvious cover-up pertaining to his eligibility for the Office of President.

The thing that Conspiracy Theorists should be hopping mad about is that the vale of darkness is not coming from what BHO has some control over. Nay friends, the Federal and State Judiciary, State Secretaries of State, a Hawaiian Governor, Hospitals and related universities are ALL part of a cover-up that by virtue of inaction calls into question President Obama’s legitimacy to his elected Office.

After January 20th the Mainstream Media coverage of the question of BHO status as a Natural Born Citizen has equally vanished adding the mystery of cover-up.

Now it seems only a few stalwart blogs which have a specific reading constituency and a few out of the Mainstream Media keep plugging along trying to get a Court – indeed – the Supreme Court of the United States to hear their voice.

Of course those who are still pursuing BHO’s legitimacy have an agenda to cause a Constitutional crisis in which the end result is the defrocking of President Obama of his Office. I can join that club; however the real issue is simply affording the American public honest answers to LEGITIMATE questions.

No matter if the answers are favorable or unfavorable for Barack Hussein Obama; the actual litmus test is the authority and viability of the U.S. Constitution as the frame work for the rule of law in America.

This multi-level of private, academic institutional, hospital, State and Federal government cover-up raises an implication that everyone’s hoped for Obamasiah is a man that does not honor his oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution.

If President Obama does not honor his oath, what does that say about his intentions to transform America to the Left no matter the opposition as well as his commitment to America’s National Security at home and abroad?

WorldNetDaily (WND) is one of those out of the Mainstream Media outlets that are definitely not respected by Leftist and there are a significant amount of centrists and Conservatives that question WND’s quality of information. I for one trust the angle of WND and I certainly doubt this media outlet does any worse on the political Right then say the New York Times does on the political Left. There is an old saying about processing information: Be at least as smart as a cow; eat the hay and spit out the sticks. I suspect that is an axiom that could be applied to the entire political spectrum. One stick you should spit out immediately is that any form of media is unbiased. Those days are gone.

Even Fox News that bills itself as “fair and balanced” is obviously leaning toward the Right. Thank God they do. At least there is another MSM angle for people to find some good hay to eat to distinguish form the sticks in most of the Slanted Left MSM.

Anyway … Getting back to BHO’s legitimacy to be President; I read a WND article of the latest efforts to discover that legitimacy.

Evidently a gal lawyer from the State of California managed to get into a lecture given by Chief Justice John Roberts at the University of Idaho. Attorney Orly Taitz pressed the Chief Justice about the BHO eligibility to be President. She got a promise from the Chief Justice in front of witnesses that included people of State and Academic stature to look into the Obama mystery.

Take a moment and read the WND REPORT.

JRH 3/18/09

Senator: Eligibility is up to the voters

Senator Mel Martinez actually responded to one of his constituents that Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility for the Office of President is irrelevant since the majority of voters “vetted” by choosing him to be President.

I can hardly believe the Republican Senator from Florida is essentially saying that the U.S. Constitution is irrelevant, can you?

Here is the WorldNetDaily report on this latest obfuscation and cover-up news about President Barack Hussein Obama’s citizenship and eligibility to be President.

JRH 3/6/09 (Hat Tip: Above Top Secret)

America’s Imperial Presidency

It is irrelevant as to the Democratic Party or the Republican Party; the Office of President in America has become an Imperial Presidency.

The Imperial Presidency can be defined, succinctly, as a structure in which enormous discretionary power to respond to national security crises and perceived dangers is concentrated in the office of the president. In this scheme, Congress, willingly or not, is only a bit player. Although the term has a pejorative connotation, it is not so much the existence of an Imperial Presidency that has spurred public backlashes as it is the abuses of power that have sometimes come with it. (Imperial Presidency – govexec.com)

The Party out of the Presidential Office usually harangues the President when there is an obvious exercise of power and the Party in Office often looks the other way.

In my opinion an Imperial Presidency is a good thing with a wise leader and yet it could be a bad thing under a President that fits the old maxim – Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Again the favor of the media, the voters or the out of power Party is usually the ones hollering from the roof tops that an Imperial President has corrupted his power. In the long run it is the evaluation of history that shines the light of motive and the end-game as to wickedness or goodness.

For instance every Left Wing Nut (and admittedly many on the center Right) will display President George W. Bush as an example of power corrupting the Office of President. I may be in the minority but I disagree. The Bush Administration prevented any future attack on American soil utilizing the very methods that Lefties would call corrupted power. That’s just me. The debate on what is more valuable for American society – security or absolute civil liberties – during a national conflict will go on for some time only again to be evaluated in the future by history.

So what is John getting at?

I just ran across a WorldNetDaily article that is still writing about President Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be in the Office of President.

The article talks about all the failed law suits to try and force BHO to divulge historical documents pertaining to his eligibility to be President. Further WND talks about the current law suit initiated by Alan Keyes which has not yet bitten the dust that essentially wanted the California Secretary of State not to certify BHO’s Electoral College Electors to cast their votes until the historical documents are made public.

The law suit had to be amended when indeed the Electoral College certified Barack Hussein Obama as the next President of the USA; however I understand the law suit has been amended to still demand the documents.

So here’s the thing: The Courts on all levels of authority right up to the Supreme Court has looked the other way using legalese to ignore the eligibility issue. Does anyone think the current Imperial President will allow pre-election personal documents see the light of day when he definitely has the post-election power to delay and obfuscate the production of said documents at least until the end of his Office as President?

I am thinking NO.

Yet I am all for these stalwart litigators to plowing away (if they got the dough) for one day BHO will not be in Office (barring any extra-Constitutional coup). On that day history will demonstrate if BHO was a wise Imperial President or a Power Corrupt President.

JRH 2/14/09