Who Believes in Peace?

If you have not heard Israel has a new government with the Likud Party as the majority partner. This means Benjamin Netanyahu is the Prime Minister and Avigdor Lieberman (prevailing profile and less hostile profile) is the Foreign Minister.

If you haven’t been following Israeli politics you also may not be aware that Lieberman is quite the controversial choice to be Foreign Minister. Lieberman and his Yisrael Beiteinu (English: Israel our Home) Party are openly hostile toward Arab-Muslims as a fifth column dedicated to bring down Israel and terminate Jews.

I know it is extreme but I agree with Lieberman. I agree because Mohammedan Scriptures (or whatever Islam calls their holy writings) are teaming with references to convert or exterminate Jews (Christians are in that category as well).

So I see Lieberman standing for truth even though it is politically incorrect.

Noting Lieberman’s disposition Mahmoud Abbas - aka Abu Mazen (positive profile and terrorist profile) - is utilizing the Palestinian victimhood card saying there is no way the PA can deal with Lieberman on a peaceful solution to create a sovereign Palestinian State.

Abbas is probably correct.

On the other hand Abbas is demonstrating his Islamic Supremacist hubris when he projects that the Palestinians have any intention in living in peace with a Jewish State. That is simply lying hypocrisy by a taqiyya-master schmoozing with the West.

Ben’s Blog puts a supremely credible essay of why or how Abbas is schmoozing.

JRH 4/3/09

Olmert will re-divide Jerusalem

The Christian Right’s and religious Judaic Zionist’s greatest fear is about to happen according to Arab media outlets and Slanted Left Israeli Dr. Guy Bechor: Olmert is dividing Jerusalem between Israel and the pseudo-nationality known Palestinian-Arab.

I hold little trust in Arab media reporting; however this Bechor individual is purported to be a respected Leftist in Israel.

You know something is bad when a Leftist highly criticizes the division of Jerusalem in the name of peace. This trade for peace has proven dubious in the past in that it leads to further violence with the goal of the destruction of Israel. Personally I trust this paradigm has not changed.

If indeed the future of Jerusalem has been imprinted in writing as Bechor indicates, then Olmert may go down in history as Israel’s version of the American Benedict Arnold – a sell out traitor to the future of his nation and people.