Is There a Conspiracy Link Between the CIA and President Bush?

Jack Cashill insinuates a mysterious conspiracy possibility involving or I should I say revolving around Plamegate.

After reading “Joseph Wilson's Original Sin and how the Administration Washed it Away,” I realized I might have been a little slow connecting the dots.

Who sent Wilson to Niger? It has been verified that wifey Valerie Plame sent Wilson. Why did Plame send Wilson? This is the CIA connection I did not get until possibly now. Wilson was highly involved with French interests in providing nuclear material to Saddam Hussein. The CIA was against an Iraqi invasion by the Bush Administration.

Why was the CIA so dead set against an invasion that America’s Cloak and Dagger Company did everything it could to embarrass President Bush and the Administration?

Here is my guess. Iran has been an official enemy of America since Carter sold out the Shah and allowed the Iran Revolution to proceed. As is typical of those in the American bureaucracy that favor Arab assets to accomplish National Interests, I believe the CIA was working with Saddam to do something to a mutual enemy – Iran. In that work relationship, I sense the CIA (some how) schemed with the French without the knowledge of the Bush Administration or perhaps prior to the Bush Administration.

Why do I contemplate an operation was in place prior to the Bush Administration Agenda to take Saddam down? It is because America shipped out 1.77 tons of enriched uranium out of Iraq. The story was brief but mysteriously withdrawn. Now why would the Bush Administration not take advantage of this moment of vindication?

I sense the CIA was trying to sweep complicity to an Iraqi nuclear program that would also implicate France and Russia. By the time the Bush Administration connected the dots about CIA designs that ran counter to a Bush agenda, the invasion was committed to happen or happened.

President Bush had to decide whether to look like a weak President not in control of his own government and expose America to the embarrassment of a Clinton Agenda still moving in the bureaucracy or hide the dual opposite American government agendas to project strength.

I believe the President chose the latter. Unfortunately the less embarrassing choice set Bush up to be a target by unscrupulous Democrats that had only one agenda: to regain power in government at any cost. I believe there are Democrats that are privy to the knowledge of the CIA agenda. I believe Sandy Berger stole Classified Documents and shredded them to protect Clinton and various Democrats who might be traced to the CIA, French and Russian agenda. When those documents were destroyed, President Bush lost a smoking gun to be used against his political enemies.

Thus President Bush was at the mercy of the 2006 election in hope of perpetuating a Bush agenda. The Democrats exploited enough propaganda that voters were swayed to Democrat lies. I sense President Bush has lost his resolve to follow through and acquiescing to political enemies at the expense of American honor.

Law and Disorder: Sherman's March through the Law

It’s Law and Order time, Fred Thompson writes about the Libby conviction for AEI.
JRH
************************************************

Law and Disorder: Sherman's March through the Law

By Fred Thompson

Posted: Wednesday, March 7, 2007

American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

Doesn't Patrick Fitzgerald look like a man who has dodged a bullet and is ready to get out of town? That was my first impression after watching the special-prosecutor's press conference after news came down Wednesday about Scooter Libby. It would seem that prosecuting a Bush official before a Washington jury is not necessarily a slam dunk after all when the gruel is this thin.

Two crucial decisions were made in order for this sorry state of affairs to have played out this way. The first was when the Justice Department folded under political and media pressure because of the Plame leak and appointed a special counsel. When DOJ made the appointment they knew that the leak did not constitute a violation of the law. Yet, instead of standing on that solid legal ground they abdicated their official responsibility.

The Plame/Wilson defenders wanted administration blood because the administration had had the audacity to question the credibility of Joe Wilson and defend themselves against his charges. Therefore, the Department of Justice, in order to completely inoculate themselves, gave power and independence to Fitzgerald that was not available to Ken Starr, Lawrence Walsh, or any prior independent counsel under the old independent-counsel law. Fitzgerald became unique in our judicial history in that he was accountable to no one. And here even if justice had retained some authority they could hardly have asked Fitzgerald why he continued to pursue a non-crime because they knew from the beginning there was no crime.

From there the players' moves were predictable. Fitzgerald began his Sherman's march through the law and the press until he thought he had finally come up with something to justify his lofty mandate--a case that would not have been brought in any other part of the country.

The media by then was suffering from Stockholm syndrome--they feared and loved Fitzgerald at the same time. He was establishing terrible precedent by his willingness to throw reporters in jail over much less than serious national-security matters--the Ashcroft standard! Yet Fitzgerald was doing the Lord's work in their eyes. This was a "bad leak" not a "good leak" like the kind they like to use. And it was much better to get the Tim Russert and Ari Fleischer treatment than it is to get the Judith Miller treatment. Fitzgerald paid no price for his prosecutorial inconsistencies, his erroneous public statements, or his possible conflicts of interest. And now they get to point out how this case revealed the "deep truths" about the White House.

The second decision was made by Libby himself. It was the decision to spend eight hours without counsel in a grand-jury room with Fitzgerald with this controversy swirling around him while trying to remember and recount conversations with various news reporters--reporters who he knew would be interviewed about these conversations themselves. These, of course, were reporters Libby had no right to expect to do him any favors. This sounds like a man with nothing to hide. This sounds like a man who doesn't appreciate the position he is in or what or whom he is dealing with.

It is ironic that what Libby is facing today is not due to the evil machinations so often attributed to the White House but rather due to an apparent naivety.

Like most Washington political fights, very few participants have been left unscathed. Among the results of this investigation and trial, there will be less cooperation by public officials in future investigations and less ability of reporters to get information. We should ask ourselves: Are our institutions or is our sense of justice stronger because of this prosecution?

Fred Thompson is a visiting fellow at AEI.

© 2005 (sic) American Enterprise Institute. All Rights Reserved.

Shooting Elephants in a Barrel

I was praying Ann Coulter would have an immediate response to Libby’s conviction. Coulter writes in much more erudite manner than my own reaction to this travesty of Justice.

Coulter points out all the heinous crimes that Democrats have been implicated in over the years with little to zero criminal investigation.

It is as if Democrats or those allied with Democrats are excluded from criminal charges. The thing that drives me nuts is that President Bush has allowed his Justice Department in continuing to coat Democrats in Teflon while Republicans are coated with stick’em.

READ IT!

HITLER'S LEGACY: ISLAMIC ANTISEMITISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST

I just read a most fascinating Paper written by Matthias Kuntzel concerning the connection to Hitler’s legacy and the current Islamofascism. Everyday people simply have NO idea on how much Adolf Hitler is praised and admired by Mohammedans influenced by strict adherence to Mohammed’s example and Sharia Law.

Kuntzel sets out to draw a line from Hitler to el-Husseini (Grand Mufti of Jerusalem) to Hassan al-Banna (influenced by Wahhabis and founder of Muslim Brotherhood) and other Mohammedan Nationalists of the time.

The interesting thing that stands out is that the Mohammedan nations that spew the most hatred today seemed to accept a Jewish entity in the Middle East in the late 19th Century and pre-WWI era. It was the influence of these early Islamofascists that changed the thought patterns of the Middle Eastern Mohammedan to that of common hatred of Jews, Christians and Democracy.

The great tragedy of the successful Islamofascist propaganda indoctrination of the Middle East lay in extremely short sighted diplomacy of Western Victors of WWII to cuddle up to the Mohammedan of the period. Thus war criminal el-Husseini was actually permitted to escape and now here we are today dealing with the diplomacy of expediency.

This is the same kind of diplomacy promoted by the current Democratic Party, RINO’s and Appeasement minded Europeans.

You must read Kuntzel’s Paper for an understanding of the present. You can go to the source at Think-Israel or I have it posted after this introduction at SlantRight.com.

The Left Indeed Scapegoats Scooter

I find this unbelievable! Scooter Libby was convicted with four guilty verdicts relating to perjury and obstruction of justice. Then Special Persecutor Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald proclaims this is the event that wraps four years of American taxpayer money.

Fitzgerald goes after Libby for lying about the outing of Plame. Yet Fitzgerald knew full well from the beginning of his investigation that it was Richard Armitage that outed Plame. AND Armitage outed Plame not in any attempt to cover-up anything President Bush or Vice President Cheney were doing, Armitage outed Plame to embarrass the President and Vice President because he was against invading Iraq.

In fact Fitzgerald told Armitage to keep quite about his role in leaking Plame’s name.

Plame and Wilson go Scot free about lying. There is NO indictment whatsoever for Armitage's treasonous acts and MSM manipulation to wrap his anti-War/pro-Arab agenda; then Libby is convicted for perjury and obstruction of justice.

The Yahoo News (which I found out is often edited) report makes Libby looks scandalously heinous and does not write about the appeal outlook put forth by Libby’s Attorney until the end.

Where is the Justice!?

Navy Blocks WorldNetDaily Access

WorldNetDaily is being censored by the US Navy, i.e. the Navy has blocked access to all its Navy and Marine bases and ships at sea. When WND confronted the Navy about this the military branch stonewalled about an answer.

Apparently the Navy now owns up to the censorship. The official statement claims the blocking is not because of WND content but rather with security suspicions with WND’s server.

WND claims its server is operated by The Planet in Dallas which is one of the most secure server farms in America. WND questions why the Navy then has not blocked other domains that use The Planet?

Personally I believe some Left Wing bureaucrat with the Navy apparachnik was vindictive over WND reporting of the persecution of the expelled Navy Chaplain James Klingenschmitt for praying in Jesus’ Name.

I know many people on the Left and on the Right consider WND an untrustworthy source of news; however the immense statistics of readership demonstrate there is a huge trust in existence.

Just within the last few weeks, Internet audience ratings service comScore Media Metrix said WND's traffic growth was No. 1 among all political news sources and No. 2 among all sites related to politics in any way.

WND's traffic increased 54 percent in January, according to the report, which said WND attracted more visitors in the month than the websites of any of the presidential candidates including Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards.

WND has also been consistently ranked by several major Internet ratings agencies as the "stickiest" news site on the Internet – meaning readers average more time on it than any other.

By WND's own traffic counts, the site attracts about 6 million "unique visitors" (meaning different people) every month. It attracts between 50 million and 60 million pageviews per month. (WND)

The statistics show that WND spanks the Mainstream Media (MSM) as an Internet source of News. That has to drive the Slanted Left nuts (hooray).

At any rate, WND has no intention on letting Navy censorship occur without a fight. WND intends to litigate and do so with monetary damages in mind. Now is a bruised Navy ego worth costing American tax payers money because WND reports the truth?

Supreme Court Spanks Left Court – Again

Remember the news story in which then High School student Tyler Chase Harper attempted to exercise his free speech right with an act of civil disobedience? The Left Coast High School was forcing its students to attend homosexual awareness assemblies. Harper chose to protest by expressing his Christian view of homosexuality.

Poway High School of San Diego chose to punish Harper rather than uphold his Constitutional rights. Harper sued. The case ended up in the US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals which represents the Left Coast.

Guess what the Left Appellate Court ruled? It ruled to the favor of Poway High School. Fortunately there is a Supreme Court that often spanks the decisions of the Left Appellate Court and once again that is what happened.

The Leftist lawyers representing Poway High School tried to get the Supreme Court to dismiss the challenge to the Left Appellate Court by suggesting the case is moot due to Harper’s graduation. The Supreme Court liked idea however did not rule to the immoral Leftists expectations. By an 8 - 1 decision the Supreme Court ruled the whole package as moot including vacating the Left Appellate Court’s ruling.

That means the Left Appellate Court’s decision cannot be used as a precedent against anti-homosexual freedom of speech.