The video compares (roughly) the American Constitution with Constitutions of various nations in the Middle East dominated by Islam/Mohammedanism. The essence that the video portrays is these Middle Eastern Constitutions make Islamic law the supreme guide post for all laws. This means non-Muslim citizens are not afforded the same rights as Muslims and even Muslims are subject to extreme penalties for breaking Islamic law (e.g. converting from Islam to Christianity (or any other religion or atheism is a capital crime leading to a death sentence).
I am not going to call Barack Hussein Obama a Muslim for I truly do not believe he is one. I believe BHO is a Christian only for politics and even that is an association with what is known as progressive Christianity. “Progressive” the catch word for center/left to outright Marxists who pick and choose matters of Christian faith that agrees with a Secular Humanist ideology and toss out the Christian faith that disagrees with Secular Humanism. Thus “progressive” Christians support homosexual lifestyles, adulterous lifestyles, a socialistic approach for solving the problems of poverty, abortion (infanticide) and anything else that may contradict the values of Biblical Christianity.
That being said BHO has publicly said he supports America’s traditional friendship with Israel; however some of his buddies are (were) overt supporters of the murdering terrorists that call themselves Palestinian Arabs.
That being said BHO’s plan for global peace is to talk to American enemies (i.e. Iran, Syria, North Korea and potentially Stateless Islamic terrorists) without pre-conditions. That is a set-up for a political and perhaps security damning sucker punch.
Dear God in Heaven! Do NOT vote for Barack Hussein Obama on November 4th. If you already have, pray more McCain voters turn out to override your early voting or absentee ballot that was cast in ignorance.
Barack Hussein Obama supporters and BHO himself have pooh-poohed how past ideological associations build a person’s character in the present. The spin machine on BHO’s associations (regardless of casual, mentor, friend and admiration) is convoluted enough to suggest to desperate American voters that the past is irrelevant to the Leftist clarion call for “change.”
The Leftist spin machine has been so effective that way too many voters are blinded to the kind of change Barack Hussein Obama would bring to America.
I assure you the “change” BHO intends will do little to nothing to change the politics as usual that emanates from Washington, DC. Indeed the Democratic Party will use politics as usual to force a complete socialistic (if not down right Marxist) and secular humanist utopia down the minds of Americans whether it is wanted or not. The Left will ensure the road to that illusory utopia is mandated by a Leftist Federal Judiciary.
This means the government will begin to control a collective of citizens who lose their individuality to mandated government programs managing personal lives.
This means that Biblical Christianity (the Leftist belief that Christians are ignorant guns and Bibles Americans) could very well become a felony offense. That rule of law difficulty for Christians would occur when Biblical Christians preach that homosexuality and other deviant behaviors are a sin. The Leftist Utopia would condemn this as felonious hate speech as opposed to Biblical Truth.
The character of the political ruling elite would become even more irrelevant when adultery or anti-American hatorade becomes a norm rather than an exception (“I did not have sex with that woman.”)
The road to the Leftist utopia would eliminate or revise American history that demonstrated that a Christian character was the foundation espoused by the Founding Fathers. Some of America’s early leaders received a lot of public retribution for even the perception of scandalous morals that today would be a norm of life.
Have you noticed that the McCain campaign has finally decided to expose the character flaws of Barack Hussein Obama?
I say it is about time; however anti-McCainites and pundits enmeshed in political correctness are condemning the expose as a tactic to get American’s minds off the economy and/or a heinous racist ploy to appeal to the prejudice or to incite prejudice against Afro-American Obama.
The tactic on the first count probably has some truth in it but not the truth Leftist Democrats and BHO would have you believe. There is a lot of bipartisan blame to go around on the current economic crisis in America. The Democrats are just as culpable if not more so as the Republicans. After all it was Democrats (whether in minority or majority) that blocked Republican attempts to reform the lending practices of Freddy and Fannie. Congressmen Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd were whole hearted supporters of making sure bad loans were provided to people who did not have the means to keep the payments up. Man you should watch Bill O’Reilly try to pin down Barney Frank as a lying Leftist Democrat on this issue. In true Leftist form Frank used the spin of lying to try to place blame of Republicans while simultaneously saying he led squeaky clean legislation to reform Freddy and Fannie. Even confronted with Frank’s own words the Congressman still tried to spin the illusionist lie.
So is the McCain campaign wrong for focusing on Obama’s character rather than the Democratic Party screw-up of the economy? Absolutely not! It is Leftist lying that contributed to the banking crisis of 2008 and Barack Hussein Obama may be a typical flawed lying Democrat. Character matters in leadership.
Have you noticed that every time an Afro-American of the Leftist persuasion comes under scrutiny for his or her beliefs that the wall of racist accusation built against the critic? That is exactly what the Obama campaign is doing to attempt to shut up Sarah Palin and potential character examination of Obama by the McCain camp.
I pray that Palin’s public speeches that entreat voters to examine Obama’s character are just the first of the one-two punch of the McCain Campaign. Let’s hope McCain has the cajones to do the same on Tuesday’s Presidential Debate. Let’s pray McCain is skilled enough to counter Obama schmoozing that past association and that long term mentoring and that long term admiration of Marxists and Black Supremacism is handled effectively. I say that because Barack Hussein Obama with the aid of the Mainstream Media has effectively to date pooh-poohed all those Obama character deficiencies as irrelevant. Dear God in Heaven! A quarter century of engulfment with that kind of rhetoric cannot be dismissed with an “I was eight” with this one guy and “I never heard” such things with others. That is a lame voter that falls for that!
Now late last night I cross posted a defense of Sarah Palin’s Obama attacks from the Ace of Spades HQ. In that post there was an excerpt from the Tammy Bruce blog that pertained to the dubious nature of BHO’s past. I did not read much past the excerpt last night but I did this morning.
Whew! The post is awesome for it posits the wonder in one’s mind how Barack Hussein Obama has escaped scrutiny with a near complete blackout by the Mainstream Media. Do yourself a favor and read it. It could be the McCain Campaign talking points of who BHO really is.
I guess I should mention something about Russia invading Georgia however I am in a “wait and see what happens next” mode.
Simply it looks like the Philistine Giant Goliath is imposing a regional hegemonic will on smaller pro-Western/American David. Will little David’s allies confront Russia or will little David have to find that miracle smooth stone to whack Goliath in the head alone?
I always thought a spark would enflame into a global conflict. I was thinking Israel/USA having sparks with Iran. Another scenario is Israel having sparks with Hezbollah which might spread into Syria and ultimately bring Iran in the mess.
If you look at a map, you will notice is in a strategic area between Russia and the Middle East. Also note that Georgia is hot to join NATO. And then note that Georgia has been lobbying internationally to have oil pipelines by pass Russia to go through Georgia, then Turkey supplying Europe. This would eliminate Russia as the controlling middle man.
There are a lot sparks here to set off a global forest fire that would force appeasement minded EU to man-up where they stand vis a vis America or Russia.
Natan Sharansky’s book “A Case for Democracy” was the public paradigm of President Bush’s reason for the end game of the occupation of Iraq after removing Saddam Hussein from power. The essence of the paradigm is that where Democracy is allowed to prosper repressive regimes and the legacy of repression becomes dismantled.
Sharansky is an Israeli citizen now and even involved in the Israeli government; however at one time Sharansky was a citizen of the former Soviet Union. When Sharansky applied for immigration to Israel, the Soviets denied him claiming he knew too many State Secrets.
Sharansky became closely associated with Andrei Sakharov (nuclear physicist) as dissidents to the autocratic Communism. Sharansky’s involvement with the dissidents earned him a conviction as a spy and treason. He was sent to a Siberian gulag where he was badly mistreated.
After more than ten years in the gulag, international pressure secured Sharansky’s release and immigration to Israel. Shortly thereafter the Soviet Regime collapsed and a Russian government attempted to transform into a Democracy. (Putin is currently eroding Democratic Institutions in Russia).
Thus the paradigm that Democracy always overcomes repressive institutions in a nation if given the opportunity to succeed. This paradigm made sense to me as well; unfortunately it is not an absolute theory. Evidently culturally ingrained repression in which religion and statehood are considered one makes the paradigm of Western Democracy not to take hold in Mohammedan nations.
Now there appears to be another dent in Sharansky’s paradigm for Democracy. Democracy only functions as well as a nation’s people elect strong leadership over weak leadership. The Leadership in Democracy makes a nation strong or weak. Strength or weakness is often the difference between successful or failed policies. In some cases Strength or weakness is the difference between existence and obliteration.
Since Israel’s successful founding as a modern Jewish State in 1948, successful democratically elected strong leadership enabled Israel to stave off Mohammedan nations from executing a second holocaust upon the sliver of land known as the Jewish State of Israel. NOW Israel’s weak leadership led by Ehud Olmert as Prime Minister is endangering Israel’s existence with foolish plans that are slowly eroding Israel’s existence based on the trust of EU Democracy in which their citizens are becoming more and more anti-Semitic and pro-Mohammedan as well as America in which a growing number of Democrats and RINO Republicans are becoming pro-Arabic in foreign policy. Couple Olmert’s weakness in not discerning his Western foreign Democracy's agenda with the insanity of trusting Arabs with land for peace will lead to destruction.
In an article written in the Jewish World Review, Carolyn Glick is astounded that the Olmert government has survived considering the huge mistakes and deluded future plans he proposes for Israel.
Glick reports that Olmert is about to give away Judea, Samaria (Israeli for the West Bank), Jerusalem and divide Israel to enable so-called Palestinians a contiguous sovereign nation. That is an agenda that will do Iran’s Ahmadinejad’s work for him: Israel will self-destruct under the weight deluded trust in the honesty of plenteous Arabs committed to end Israel’s existence.
I just completed reading an essay of about Professor Charles Hill of Yale: A bastion of Conservatism in a sea of Liberalism. The essay was about Hill’s eminent qualifications as a Professor and now as an advisor to Rudy Giuliani on foreign affairs as pertaining to Giuliani’s run for the Presidency.
I have always appreciated Giuliani’s assertiveness as a leader; however his stands on social/moral issues to be a bit to Slanted Left to appreciate him.
After reading the piece on Charles Hill and Hill’s confidence in Giuliani as a leader to get things done in the War on Terror, my wavering again has began to flutter. The team Giuliani has assembled pertaining to strong leadership against Islamofascist terrorism is extremely well qualified.
+Ayers.JPG)
.jpg)
Posts
