Ahmadinejad brushes off Iran election violence

Well it looks like the “divine assessment” from Allah to Supreme Leader Khamenei to Ahmadinejad had the fix going on Iran’s recent election. In spite of Mousavi - Ahmadinejad’s rival - also claiming victory, the government results show Ahmadinejad had a land slide victory.

Iranian youth reminiscent of the violent protests staged prior to the Shah being deposed, reared its head at the announcement that Mousavi had lost the election. Mousavi immediately proclaimed fraud. Ayatollah Khamenei would have none of Mousavi publicly telling his people Ahmadinejad’s victory was a “divine assessment.”

This indicates to me that the Supreme Leader desired for Ahmadinejad to remain in Office. The carefully crafted and approved candidates probably were thought to be less than inspiring to the Iranian voters. Since Supreme Leader Khamenei believes it is Allah’s will (yeah right) for Ahmadinejad to be President, I am certain the Islamic Supreme Leader ordered the fix.

Mousavi has protested the results in very attention getting style. Look for Mousavi to disappear after the public scrutiny dies down. That is what happens in Islamofascist regimes.

JRH 6/14/09

Be a Voice – De-Nuke Iran

Ben’s Blog is a remarkable source for information on that which is inherently evil in Islam vis-a-vie Western Culture.

Ben has alerted me to a website/web-community that has the purpose of encouraging the American government to be alert to all means necessary to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear power.

The website is DeNuke Iran.

DeNuke Iran has this purpose:

What can we do?

Together collectively - thousands and thousands and thousands of us - we have a chance. Our voice can be heard.

Together we can raise hell.

The alternative is to leave our fate in the hands of Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton and President Obama and the UN and the IAEA and the Europeans and the Russians.. Good luck.

Sign the declaration. Join the community.

Encourage others to do the same.

Our collective voice can be heard.

We must tell our policy makers to do whatever it takes to stop Iran.

And to do whatever it takes before it's too late.

This is the kind of “right wing extremism” that America’s Left fears. Not because DeNuke Iran is a hate site promoting violence, rather it is the Slanted Right willing to use a voice to gather a political voice to influence American voters away from Leftist appeasement foreign policy. Leftist appeasement is uncannily in the mold of the Neville Chamberlains of pre-WWII. British Prime Minister Chamberlain sought “peace in our time” at any cost. That cost was to allow Hitler to walk on the sovereignty of Germany’s near neighbors with the excuse of gathering Germanic speaking peoples into one nation. Thus Austria and the Sudetenland of (then) Czechoslovakia became part of the Nazi German Reich.

Chamberlain’s “peace in our time” was a delusive illusion that allowed the eventual slaughter of 12 million persons of which roughly 6 million were Jews.

President Barack Hussein Obama’s agenda of appeasement at any cost will make Israel vulnerable to extermination and will force America to choose between the cowardice moral bankruptcy or protecting American assets and allies.

The moral bankruptcy would be looking the other way as Islamic radicals fund Arabs that call themselves Palestinians, client Shi’ite Hezbollah, Syria and Iran strike out on the Islamic version of the “Final Solution” for Jewish Israel.

The other choice of honoring the protection of American assets and allies will lead the USA into a Johnny Come Lately situation as Britain was as the Nazis invaded Poland.

America will be at war regardless. The cliché of “pay me now or pay me later” will happen to America. The “pay me now” is preemptively preventing a nuclear Iran. It is true a preemptive action against Iran will lead to a war; however there will certainly be less carnage than the “pay me later” situation in which millions of civilians will die.

Of course if Obama chooses the cowardice of moral bankruptcy, then Americans will be safe in America – for awhile. America will cease to be that which makes America great. America will spiral down from hyper-power to an isolated nation that will submerge into Leftist globalist insignificance or fight for Her democratic-republic existence that began with the Declaration of Independence.

So check out this DeNuke Iran website and become part of a voice that showers Americans about the dangers of a nuclear armed Iran.

JRH 6/14/09

The Tool of the Muslim-Arabs

Caroline Glick reports what Americans will never hear in the Mainstream Media (MSM).

President Barack Hussein Obama has become the dhimmi tool for Arab Muslims to accomplish that which they were unable to do via several wars of invasion; viz. placing Israel in a position of imminent destruction.

To ensure this Obama agenda to promote Islam to the detriment of the Jewish-Zionist State of Israel, BHO has appointed a minion in George Mitchell. Apparently Mitchell’s Obama mandate is to coerce Israel into making Judea and Samaria (the West Bank) and Gaza into a viable sovereign State.

BHO has mandated that Mitchell set up his Office of coercion in Jerusalem which is staffed with Arabophile Americans who have a history of promoting the illegitimate cause of a group of Arabs establishing a State called Palestine.

So Prime Minister Netanyahu is in a position in which he has to protect Israel’s existence while stringing BHO along so that the Obamasiah does not cut off the American alliance with the ONLY Western style democracy in the Middle East. Just for clarity, that Western Style democracy is NOT the Islamic-mobocracy of the fractured terrorist leadership of the Palestine Authority and Hamas. Israel has all the elements of a viable republic in which the voting citizens have a voice in who manages the Israeli government. This incidentally includes Israeli-Arab citizens who are not Jewish friendly.

The PA/Hamas mobocracy wishes to exterminate Jews living in the West Bank. The Israeli government actually accommodated the Hamas mob in Gaza by forcing the Jews out. Did Hamas peacefully appropriate the viable business operation left behind by Jewish settlers in Gaza? NO! They not only trashed the viable Jewish infrastructure but the Hamas mob violated Left Behind synagogues.

Christian-Arabs had been a significant population in the West Bank. For years the majority population of the city of Bethlehem was the Christian-Arabs. Islamic persecution and supremacism has forced a significant amount of Christian-Arabs to flee the West Bank allowing the Muslim-Arabs to usurp their land and their livelihood.

Let us also mention that the official agenda of both PA Islamic terrorists and Hamas Islamic terrorists is to exterminate the Jewish State of Israel.

With all this in mind. How in the world does President Barack Hussein Obama honestly believe that creating a hostile State of Muslim Arabs called Palestine can remotely solve the Middle East’s peace problems?

Let me finish off my thoughts with Glick’s conclusions of what Prime Minister Netanyahu faces with the Obama agenda and his Mitchell minions:

And that's the thing of it. At the end of the day, Netanyahu has three main challenges that he must meet if he is to successfully protect Israel in the coming years. He must prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. He must secure Israel's national and strategic interests in Judea and Samaria and sole Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem. And he must do what he can to avoid an open breach with Washington.

By deploying Mitchell to Jerusalem, Obama is trying to prevent Netanyahu from achieving any of these aims. Only by neutralizing Mitchell will Netanyahu free his schedule to contend with them.

JRH 6/13/09

The Highway to Evil Iran

Iran is having a Presidential election today June 12, 2009. Apparently the voters have been stoked by public debates between the candidates. It seems the top two candidates are the incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the challenger with the most publicity (there are others) is Mir Hossein Mousavi. At this point it appears this election may have the largest turn out since Ruhollah Khomeini booted the Shah of Iran off the throne.

The Iranian political scene must be tense for both President Ahmadinejad and Mousavi have declared they are outright winners of this election. If there is any honesty in this election it appears politics are politics like anywhere else in the world. The duo declaration could mean both Ahmadinejad and Mousavi are doing a little dirty electioneering to sway the voters who been given and extended time to vote since the voters are still streaming in to get in line to vote.

Does it matter who wins this Iranian Presidential election? I am guessing NO. For no matter who wins the Big Dog is still Supreme Leader (if it was Germany it would be Der Fuhrer) Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Indeed the candidates were selected with the rubber stamp of Khamenei approval. There was no primary or caucus process to be a candidate for President in Iran.

So Americans wary of Jew-hating, Twelver-Shi’ite, regional hegemon Ahmadinejad may get excited about an Ahmadinejad loss, I don’t think it will change anything about Supreme Leader’s Islamic goals for Iran. In fact Supreme Leader may benefit in a geopolitical stall tactic by removing Ahmadinejad as the public face of Iran.

Mike Evans of the Jerusalem Prayer Team has some insight on this Iranian election. And yes I am also including the obligatory pitch for funds for JPT along side of the insight.

JRH 6/12/09
*****************
Nuclear proliferation will continue under Iran's new president

Mike Evans
Founder of the Jerusalem Prayer Team
Jerusalem Prayer Team
Jerusalem Report
Email Sent: June 12, 2009 9:22 AM

Elections are being held in Iran today. Even if Mahmoud Ahmadinejad should lose his position as president, there will be few if any changes in the government. Actual policy is decided by cleric and supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Certainly, Iran's position regarding nuclear proliferation will not change as it, too, is dictated by Khamenei. Former Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. and president of the Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs Dore Gold confirmed this: "The key decisions in the nuclear field are taken by the spiritual leader Khamenei, so it doesn't matter who is elected president. All of the candidates support continuing the nuclear program."

The Jewish state considers Iran's nuclear bid a very real threat given that Ahmadinejad has spent four years in office calling for Israel's destruction. He has vowed to "wipe Israel off the map."

According to Prime Minister Netanyahu, Iran is the greatest threat to Israel since the nation was founded in 1948. This is true not only regarding the Islamic republic's atomic aspirations, but also due to the fact that Iran funds, trains, and arms the fanatical groups that surround Israel - Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. Both groups have drawn Israel into wars to defend its citizens. Netanyahu has not ruled out a military strike against Iran's nuclear sites. He said after a meeting with President Obama in May, "Israel reserves its right to defend itself."

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said that even the Obama administration was becoming more wary of Iran's nuclear program. He indicated that the U.S. and Israel share the same concerns regarding Iran's reluctance to even discuss its nuclear pursuits.

Iranian affairs expert Menashe Amir believes a more moderate leader in Tehran such as Ahmadinejad's opponent Mir Hossein Mousavi may prove even more detrimental to efforts to stop Iran's nuclear pursuits. Mr. Amir feels that "If the real policy remains the same but the tone becomes softer, Iran would be able to dupe the West while it continues to develop its nuclear program, and plot in Afghanistan, Pakistan and prevent peace between Israel and the Palestinians."

The U.S. cannot and must not abandon our closest ally in the Middle East - Israel.

Please VOTE Today:

President Obama, please stand with Israel.

President Obama, please do not stand with Israel.

Click here to cast your vote: http://tool.donation-net.net/CTBF/ObamaIsraelVote.cfm?dn=1032&commID=116412035&ID=456632

As a friend of Israel, I am deeply concerned about the events that are taking shape and their effect on Israel's future. Please pray for the Jewish people. Please stand with me in defense of the Jewish people. Please let your voice be heard in support of the Jewish people.

Your gift to help the Jewish people is needed even more today as the media reports on the demoralizing effects the downturn in the economy and the resulting recession has had in Israel. More than 1.6 million Israelis live below the poverty level. Some 800,000 of those suffering from the effects of poverty are children.

Click here to give a donation online: https://www.donation-net.net/CTBF/donate.cfm?dn=1032&commID=116412035&ID=456632

Thank you to the 815 Jerusalem Prayer Team partners who have given to bless Israel. We need 1,100 to give in order to reach our goal. We are more than halfway there. Please pray today for all that have given and for those who have not given to give a gift today. Pray that God will bless them according to Psalm 122:6: "Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall PROSPER that love thee." And, Genesis 12:3 says, "I will BLESS them that BLESS thee..."

Please stand up for Israel, today. Bless her with an "I Support Israel" gift to help provide food, clothing, medications, and shelter. The world's economy has created a grave crisis for the poor. They are forgotten and suffering.

Click here to give a donation online: https://www.donation-net.net/CTBF/donate.cfm?dn=1032&commID=116412035&ID=456632

Thank you for caring.

Your ambassador to Jerusalem,

Mike Evans


Your Jerusalem World News: http://myjwn.com/

Your Jerusalem Prayer Team: http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/

_________________

The Highway to Evil Iran
John R. Houk
© June 12, 2009
_______________________

Nuclear proliferation will continue under Iran's new president

The Jerusalem Prayer Team is a non-profit, non-denominational, 501c3 organization dedicated to developing a prayer movement of people around the world. It receives no support from the Nation of Israel. Donations are tax deductible. The mission of the Jerusalem Prayer Team: To guard, defend and protect the Jewish people and Eretz Yisrael until Israel is secure, and until the Redeemer comes to Zion. Dr. Tim LaHaye, Mr. Pat Boone, Mr. Bill McCartney, Rev. Tommy Tenney, Dr. A.R. Bernard, and Dr. Jay Sekulow are just a few of the more than 300 Christian Leaders who are part of the Jerusalem Prayer Team.

JPT Donation Line: 1-888-732-2388.

The Dangers of Barack Hussein Obama

Rational Liberty has an awesome post about President Barack Hussein Obama. The RL post examines the BHO personality cult, the birth certificate controversy, the Leftist agenda and more. This is an awesome piece of writing that the Conservative mind will truly appreciate.
JRH 6/12/09
*****************
Blog Editor: Every once in awhile I update posts from the original SlantRight.com archive in case I lose favor with the server owner. Politically and theologically we don't see eye to eye; hence the reason for blogging on other platforms. Below is the rest of the post as it roughly appeared at StantRight.com.
UPDATED: 7/10/15
+++
The Dangers of Barack Hussein Obama

Rational Liberty
June 10, 2009

What makes a man dangerous? How does tyranny rear its ugly head? In politics, these two questions are mostly interrelated. A treacherous politician can become a tyrant with the proper supporting cast and a groundswell of ignorance from the People. The process can be drawn-out or it can be quite rapid, but in many instances, it has a little of both.

Political dangers arise from a hodgepodge of factors. In politics they can occasionally combine to deliver an inspirational figure to the unwitting masses. When the public mood is on a downturn and more people feel discouraged or desperate concerning their everyday lives, a seemingly transcendent politician can capture the dreams of the less industrious and largely uninformed. All that is required from the politician in question is lofty rhetoric, platitudes, constant deflection of any culpability, and promises of a return to prosperity and greatness no matter how it is achieved. Paired with a poorly educated and downtrodden citizenry, their popularity is sure to rise and prevail over any shortcomings.

We have witnessed such “cults of personality” in recent history. Nearly all of these leaders – from Joseph Stalin to Hugo Chavez – have overseen or will oversee unmitigated disasters for the populations they control. Misery and death, either for their nation or their neighbors, is a common result. The promises and dreams of the populace quickly vanish into deeper despair and the ascendance of central government. War, genocide, and a general tyranny are most frequently the ends achieved. Millions of dead civilians is usually the definitive outcome.

Over the past year and a half, the United States has seen the arrival of a new political personality. Like those leaders previously mentioned, Barack Hussein Obama broke onto the national scene at a time of general malaise, where the nation was suffering from war weariness, political discord, and the beginning of a financial collapse. The media picked up his life story and touted him as a transcendent figure who had the capacity to unite a nation and bring it out of what they felt were some of its darkest days.

However, the only achievements in the political realm by Barack Obama were his few unimpressive election wins and his calculated oratory style that seemingly mimicked the likes of Martin Luther King Jr. and other civil rights-era public speakers. His lack of any executive experience was seen as ostensibly trivial and, in some cases, refreshing. His radical record, agenda, and relationships were ignored or flat-out denied by himself, his supporters, and most of the media. In essence, his personality and his speeches propelled him to the forefront of politics – and eventually – into the White House.

But the dangers of Barack Obama are much worse than just his lack of experience or his disastrous policies.

First and foremost, Obama’s natural-born citizenship has never been confirmed – and it most likely never will be. As his father was a British citizen at the time of his birth, Barack is constitutionally ineligible for the presidency of the United States. No matter how many times that fact is denied or how many times those who mention it are ridiculed, it will always remain truthful. The fact that a constitutional violation this egregious receives very little attention and will not be remedied is quite disturbing and demonstrates how far we have already strayed from the principles of constitutional law as a nation and citizenry.

So, at the outset, and the first major problem along the path to tyranny, is the illegitimate occupation of the federal executive – commonly referred to as usurpation.

Not only has the media mostly failed to inquire about the citizenship issue, but they have also failed to seek answers about Obama’s relationships and extensive connections with far left organizations, donors, and close friends and associates. They are almost completely unwilling to criticize him and even comedians are reluctant to poke fun at him. Some have made the statement that he gives them nothing to joke about, allegedly due to his superior intellect and absence of gaffes. Either these comedians and their writers haven’t been paying attention or they are simply ignoring reality.

When this type of public cover by the media and entertainers is so blatant, one wonders why they go to such lengths to avoid what came to them so easily with multiple predecessors. Are they afraid of a general public backlash – i.e. the mob? Are they afraid of being labeled a “racist” because of Obama’s skin color? Or do they steer clear of criticism and comedy because they simply found someone with whom they agree ideologically?

In any case, the results are similar. Obama usually receives or will receive a pass on any faux pas or political failure he encounters. The public will remain uninformed and their perceptions of him will continue to be skewed by irresponsible media reporting. The entertainers will create an aura of imperviousness that resonates through the oblivious masses. In the long run, it either sets up Obama for undeserved glory – which would further contribute to the cult of personality and a potential further abuse of power – or it sets the stage for a spectacular fall and lingering public malaise, apathy, and cynicism.

Because of the negligent media habits, and the condition of our economy, the illegitimate administration has been able to move quickly to implement policies that are in fact quite radical and potentially devastating to our long-term liberty and prosperity. Laws that can cause irreversible damage are being introduced, considered, and passed by our Congress.

Some who oppose Obama’s agenda blame these policies on naïveté. The problem with this belief is that Obama has mentioned on several occasions that he plans on “remaking” American society. He follows the same pattern of influence and initiatives that past left-wing administrations adhered to when implementing their socialist, or “progressive,” agendas. Many of his plans are nearly identical to Marxist ideals and a fascist social order. He knows what he’s doing ideologically but isn’t fully competent at executive decision-making and appears to be uncomfortable in that role. This is where his inexperience shines brightly.

Regardless of the blunders, the backtracking, and the constant clarifying of their multiple positions, the Obama administration has already been able to pass some of their game-changing legislation. It’s then sold to the public as a great achievement and credit is given to the administration before any positive results are known.

A perfect example is the “economic recovery” legislation - also known as the “stimulus” bill. We were told that this $787 billion was needed immediately to save the economy, but less than 6% has been used in four months and there is no evidence of any job being “created or saved” as promised by the administration. Add this to the fact that the money used for this legislation – or any other, for that matter – must first be confiscated from individuals. Nevertheless, when the bill was signed into law, it was touted as one of the greatest achievements of a new president. But the only thing that truly made the legislation impressive was the fact that it was the single largest spending bill in history. To make matters worse, the administration and Congress made claims of restoring fiscal responsibility during a “summit” just one week later.

The rapid pace of economic destruction is intentional and it will only continue to deteriorate if the public remains apathetic, or worse, eager and excited about the “social change” Obama has begun. Still on the “change” list is the green agenda, government healthcare, and additional education spending, among many other things. Trillions of dollars in added national deficits will almost certainly sink the dollar and the U.S. economy. Not even a radical leftist can deny the effects of massive and unsustainable debts. Obama is well aware of what his agenda will do, but he’s relying on the ignorance of the public and his fellow statist supporters to let him continue along his reckless path.

The domestic front is not the only way to destroy a nation or fundamentally alter it. Foreign policy plays a key role as well. Our relations with allies and the way we handle hostile regimes plays an integral part in how we are respected and how our influence is received in foreign affairs.

Since Inauguration Day, several foreign leaders in a multitude of ways have tested Barack Obama. Each one of these tests – whether it has been the advancement of nuclear technology by Iran or the nuclear testing and launching of missiles by North Korea – has demonstrated the weakness of Obama’s more “diplomatic” strategies. In other words, he has so far failed these tests. We know that the tactics of the new administration are intentional, but are the results as well?

During the administration of George W. Bush, many Democrats expressed their concerns of using fear and perceived weakness as a means of implementing laws and policies that, in their opinion, restricted liberties in exchange for enhanced security. When tyranny has taken hold in modern times, it usually came disguised in a mask of safety and stability. The domestic agenda of Obama has already been pretty well articulated. It involves a regimentation of society guided by an influx of daily government oversight into our lives. To impose these new laws and to make them “work,” he’ll need an enforcement mechanism never before seen in this country.

By making us appear weak in the eyes of our hostile enemies, Obama is inviting further challenges to our international influence and possibly even attacks on our country or our citizens abroad. This will undoubtedly have an impact on national defense and can provide him with the necessary mandate to increase domestic surveillance and security. Even if that scenario is not premeditated, it will provide for the same type of government intrusion once feared by the supporters of the current administration.

If his foreign policy blunders and his domestic agenda do in fact make us weak, then the results can be even more catastrophic than September 11, 2001, and can create a situation similar to the events that followed Germany’s Reichstag fire in 1933.

The United States as a nation is walking a very fine line between liberty and tyranny. The balance is found in the resolve of the People and their willingness to stand up for individual freedoms and to stand against government infringements upon them. With widespread ignorance, apathy, and fear – whether it is of an economic or physical nature – the equilibrium shifts to the advantage of a domineering government. The catalyst for a dramatic transformation in the relationship between government and the governed can simply be one man with a soothing oratory style and a handful of spurious promises, along with the necessary cover provided by a supportive media.

The rise of Barack Hussein Obama has so far epitomized that cult of personality.

Nonetheless, despite all of the aforementioned risks, poll numbers are beginning to show a decline in public approval of Obama’s handling of economic and fiscal issues. And while similar political personalities rose to power in what was known as the “old world,” the United States has always had a different mentality about government and politics, and about the individuals who hold office. In the face of an extreme assault on the American way of life it may be the American tradition and longstanding American principles that are our ultimate saving grace.

Sustaining those traditions and principles in a society that suffers a constant barrage of conflicting legislation and outright mockery won’t be easy. It will only be a matter of time before the standards for individual liberty and our free republic are lowered or distorted. After all, that’s the goal of the so-called “progressive” movement in the United States – and so far it has been quite successful.

The question remains whether or not the informed citizenry can eclipse the blind and panicked masses. The dangers are real and the consequences are grave. Sooner or later, one side will have to surrender more power to the other. When that time comes, we will need to decide whether it will be the government that forfeits, or the People.

Will the political aspirations of one man and an oppressive movement prevail, or will individual liberty and principled republicanism triumph?
________________
Copyright © 2009 by RationalLiberty.com

All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means without written permission by the author. 

About Rational Liberty

Letterman, Politics and Palin

In case you live under a rock or only listen to the anti-Palin Left you may not have heard that sexagenarian David Letterman has called Sarah Palin a slut and made a kiddie porn comment about Palin’s 14 year old daughter being knocked up by Yankee player Alex Rodriguez.

Amazingly the Barack Hussein Obama channel … err … I mean MSNBC attempted to dilute Letterman’s character assassination of Palin and the kiddie porn joke about Willow Palin and Alex Rodriguez. In an interview with Contessa of MSNBC, John Ziegler pointed out the evil of Letterman. When Ziegler began to be hostile about MSNBC this Contessa chick actually said she was offended by Ziegler and cut him off and specifically told the audio/visual guys to cut Ziegler’s mike. Imagine that. Contessa cuts Ziegler off after lambasting MSNBC coverage of Letterman’s kiddie porn comment.





You can catch Governor Palin’s comment about David Letterman in an interview that radio talk radio man Ziegler did HERE.

There is a social blog network on Ning that has a group called Team Sarah.
Within that group is a blog post encouraging people to write to CBS to complain about Letterman’s inappropriate to kiddie porn comments. I encourage you to read it and participate according to the simple information made available to pummel CBS.

There is the sense that Letterman won’t be chastised by CBS because he is such a cash cow for the network. These people encourage a boycott of CBS or CBS sponsors to make a point. Personally I find it more cathartic to express my feelings. Which ever the case please do something to let Letterman know he stepped over the line.

I was watching FOX and Friends this morning and viewed what was supposed to be a Letterman apology.

"We were, as we often do, making jokes about people in the news and we made some jokes about Sarah Palin and her daughter, the 18-year-old girl, who is — her name is Bristol, that’s right, and so, then, now they’re upset with me," Letterman said. "These are not jokes made about her 14-year-old daughter. I would never, never make jokes about raping or having sex of any description with a 14-year-old girl. I mean, look at my record. It has never happened. I don’t think it’s funny. I would never think it was funny. I wouldn’t put it in a joke…"

"… Gov. Palin, if you’re watching, I would like you to consider coming to New York City — even Todd — as my guests, or leave Todd at home. I’d love to have you on the show. It’d be exciting. All right, so there, I hope I’ve cleared part of this up. Am I guilty of poor taste? Yes. Did I suggest that it was okay for her 14-year-old daughter to be having promiscuous sex? No." (FOX News)

Oops! Letterman is saying he didn’t mean the kiddie porn comment about Willow and Alex Rodriguez. NO! NO! Letterman meant that single unwed 19 year old mother Bristol Palin would be getting “knocked up” by Alex Rodriguez.

Did I miss something? Was this an apology? It sounds more like a justification for the “slut” comments about Governor Palin and inappropriate sex comments about the Palin’s daughter Bristol. So it is okay now to make crude sex comments about a politician’s daughter because she is over the age of 18?

I wonder what would happen if Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage any Conservative spokesman or comedian would make crude sex comments about President Obama’s girls?

I will tell you what would happen. There would be such a huge MSM clamor to end the careers of anyone that would dare to make sexual innuendos about the President’s children or his wife Michelle for that matter. Governor Palin may not be President BUT she is a Governor of a State in the Union of the United States of America.

Letterman needs to get a spank’ in!

JRH 6/11/09

Qur'an quotes every woman must see

Here is a message from ACT! For America pertaining to a new grassroots campaign to expose the evils of sharia law that is many American-Muslim groups is promoting. Following message is an article attached to bring home the idea that sharia law is evil.

JRH 6/10/09
******************************
Qur'an quotes every woman must see

ACT! For America email
Email sent: June 10, 2009 9:35 AM

In the very near future we will begin the launch of our 2009 “Stop Shariah Now” campaign. This will be an integrated grassroots, lobbying and public relations effort designed to raise public awareness and push for public policies that expose Shariah law and its infiltration into the United States.

Shariah Islamic law is infiltrating America through vehicles such as Shariah compliant finance products offered by major financial institutions, including UBS, AIG, Citibank and HSBC. It has been reported to us that members of the Muslim Students Association in southern California have been seen chanting their demands for Shariah law during public demonstrations. We have also seen reports that estimate between 50,000 and 100,000 Muslims in America are practicing polygamy, a practice allowed under Shariah law.

Recently, a report surfaced on the internet that Lisa Ashton, a flight attendant with British Midland Airways, was fired for refusing to wear a traditional Islamic robe and walk behind male colleagues while in public in Saudi Arabia. This is the consequence of Shariah law in a society and a Western nation’s effort to bend over backwards to accommodate it.

The next time you hear someone claim that Islam affords equal rights and protections to women, pull out the “Top 10” list below. You might want to add that in one of the hadith (the sayings and traditions of Mohammed), Mohammed claimed he was given a look into hell and saw that it was filled mostly with women because they were ungrateful to their husbands (Sahih Bukhari 2,18,61).

Then ACT! For America posted this article found on Infidels Are Cool.