Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Gingrich: Pelosi Step Down as Speaker



Well I can see the reason that Newt Gingrich is a politician. His recent e-newsletter castigates Speaker Pelosi without actually calling her a liar. I was not so capable of being so diplomatic.

Speaker Pelosi is the classic example of the hypocrisy of the now devotedly Leftist Democratic Party. The Democrats went on a rampage of vilifying President Bush’s policies of keeping America safe even to the point of calling for a criminal investigation of the Bush Administration and those that acted patriotically to protect American citizens from the reoccurrence of another 9/11.

With the aid of the Mainstream Media, the Democrats unleashed some political venom of propaganda upon American voters to influence votes that placed the Democrats back in the driver’s seat in 2006. Then the voters received another chunk full of propaganda that elected a deceptive Leftist President whose primary goal is to transform America away from her roots of Christianity toward the diversity concept of Secular Humanism and the redistribution of wealth. The term “redistribution of wealth” is MSM code talk for Socialism at best and Communism at worst.

One can see Communism at its worst through the eyes of Comrade Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong.

The social transformation led by President Barack Hussein Obama and the elite cadres of the Democratic Party is subtly validating some of the worst elements of the morally depraved in America. The transformation excuse: The morally deprave are people on par with a race or religion; to discriminate against the morally depraved is thus racism and a denial of civil rights that all the diverse Americans should enjoy.

Okay, I know I digressed on Speaker Pelosi.

Newt neatly rails on Pelosi by putting her political agenda of persecuting the Bush Administration for the Democrats call torture. Is it not ironic the Obama Administration has gone to great lengths not to insult Mohammedans by eliminating such terms as the Global War on Terror (GWOT) or Islamic terrorism to find neutral words? Yet the Obama/Pelosi Democrats have no trouble using the word “torture” rather than Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT) against Americans that have devoted themselves to keep other Americans safe. Does anyone see the lunacy on this political vendetta to prevent Conservatives of the Republican Party from ever gaining control of Congress and the White House?

But check it out: Since Speaker Pelosi as the ranking Democrat on the Intelligence committee never protested EIT; does not that make Pelosi an adherent to the practice of protecting Americans?

So you see how Speaker Pelosi has dug a hole for herself by attempting to use plausible deniability to make it look like she was never on board with EIT.

Newt is correct that Pelosi should be removed not because of her political agenda, but because her political agenda has placed America and Americans at risk by diluting National Security.

JRH 5/20/09

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Bye Bye Pelosi

Dick Morris takes Liar … err – choke – I mean … Speaker Pelosi to task concerning her dishonesty about being aware of Waterboarding and other Enhanced Interrogation Techniques. Morris in what appears to be a fireside chat format delivers his take.

Iran Increases Militarization



John R. Houk
© May 19, 2009


Unless you have been camping under a political or fall for the delusional official statement that roughly goes “Our nuclear is totally for peaceful purposes,” you are cognizant that Iran is enriching weapons grade uranium. In spite of denials from the Iranian government it is obvious the Mullocracy intends to build a nuclear arsenal to one dominate the Middle East and two the extinguishing of the existence of Israel to reclaimed perceived dar al-Islam.

Adding fuel to this fire of Iranian military largesse is the fact that Iran is building a huge stockpile of long range missiles.

Now what do you think those long range missiles will be aimed at? Another question: when will Iran place a nuclear payload into the huge cache of long range missiles?

I suspect Joe American could answer those questions effectively with the data available minus the propaganda and manipulation of the Left and its false prophet the Mainstream Media (MSM). Okay allow me to stimulate those neural transmitters to allow you to think properly. The answer ain’t blowing in the wind my friends. The answer is the huge build-up of weapons grade uranium and the building of long range missiles equals Iranian adventurism (some may call it Islamic imperialism) at the expense of Israel and Western society.

JRH 5/19/09 (Hat Tip: CUFI)
**********************
Iran to mass produce long-range missiles

By
YAAKOV KATZ
May 18, 2009 2:02 - Updated May 19, 2009 16:09
Jerusalem Post


Iran is in the midst of a multi-year plan that it hopes will culminate in the production of several hundred missile launchers and over 1,000 long-range ballistic missiles within the next six years, according to estimates in the Israeli defense establishment.

Teheran is believed to currently have an arsenal of 100-200 long-range Shihab missiles that have a range of up to 2,000 kilometers and carry up to one-ton warheads.
In addition, the Iranians last year test-fired a missile called Ashura believed to have recently entered production, the goal being to eventually replace the Shihab.

The Ashura is a solid-fuel missile, giving it a long shelf-life. Unlike the Shihab, it does not need to be fueled shortly before launching.

According to Israeli estimates, Iran's plan is to obtain 500 missile launchers and over 1,000 missiles with a range of 2,500 km. by 2015.

"The Iranians are making great efforts to obtain a significant number of missiles," said Tal Inbar, head of the Space Research Center at the Fisher Brothers Institute in Herzliya. "They already talk about how one of the ways they will overcome the missile defense systems is by firing salvos of missiles.

Inbar said that Iran was likely digging missile silos throughout the country that could be used to launch the Ashura solid-fuel missile.

In addition, regular trucks carrying hydraulic launchers could be manufactured in Iran and used as portable launchers, capable of firing from anywhere in the country.

According to estimates in Israel, Russia is still considering supplying the S-300 air defense system to Iran but is waiting to see what happens with the dialogue that the United States plans to hold with Iran.

Depending on the outcome of the dialogue and the status of relations between Washington and Moscow at the time, Russia will decide whether it will supply the system to Iran.

The S-300 is one of the most advanced multi-target anti-aircraft-missile systems in the world, with a reported ability to track up to 100 targets simultaneously while engaging up to 12 at the same time.

It has a range of about 200 kilometers and can hit targets at altitudes of 90,000 feet.
On Monday, the IAF will hold a countrywide exercise that the military stressed was not connected to current events.

The exercise will include the IAF's reserve forces and the public, should not be alarmed if it hears sirens and notices increased activity in Israel's skies, the army said.

__________________________

Iran Increases Militarization
John R. Houk
© May 19, 2009
__________________________

Iran to mass produce long-range missiles
© 1995 - 2009 The Jerusalem Post. All rights reserved.

Pelosi Democrats Drop Murtha Ethics Investigation



Here is a classic example of hypocrisy in the Democratic Party. There is a mountain of evidence that Rep. Jack Murtha was involved in political corruption (and other Democrats by the way) with the lobbying of the PMA Group ran by Paul Magliocchetti.

More than 100 House members secured earmarks in a major spending bill for clients of a single lobbying firm -- The PMA Group -- known for its close ties to John P. Murtha, the congressman in charge of Pentagon appropriations.

"It shows you how good they were," said Keith Ashdown, chief investigator at the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense. "The sheer coordination of that would take an army to finish."

PMA's offices have been raided, and the firm closed its political action committee last week amid reports that the FBI is investigating possibly illegal campaign contributions to Murtha and other lawmakers.

No matter what the outcome of the federal investigation, PMA's earmark success illustrates how a well-connected lobbying firm operates on Capitol Hill. And earmark accountability rules imposed by the Democrats in 2007 make it possible to see how extensively PMA worked the Hill for its clients.

In the spending bill managed by Murtha, the fiscal 2008 Defense appropriation, 104 House members got earmarks for projects sought by PMA clients, according to Congressional Quarterly's analysis of a database constructed by Ashdown's group.
(Yahoo News)


So check this out: the key Congressman linked to the PMA Group’s lobbying corruption is Jack Murtha the Democrat from Pennsylvania.

This is the same Jack Murtha that called American Marines cold blooded killers at the so-called Haditha Massacre. The last time I checked all but two of the Marines accused of wrong doing have been totally exonerated. The highest ranking officer in the incident Lt. Col. Jeffrey Chessani had his charges initially dropped; however the now Leftist controlled U.S. government is still seeking validation and has called for a dismissal of the three-judge dismissal in order for the entire panel of nine judges to re-hear the case. The final accused Haditha Marine is Staff Sergeant Frank D. Wuterich and his fate awaits prosecution persecution of Lt. Col. Chessani.

This same Jack Murtha implicated in the Abscam FBI investigations in which a fake Arab was bribing politicians to put them in the pocket of the fake Arab. This indicates that Murtha is no rookie when it comes to money and political corruption.

Yet the Democratic Party continues to prop up Rep. Jack Murtha. It is cosmically unbelievable. Why isn’t President Obama stepping in to chastise Murtha and call for Congress to proceed with an ethics investigation? The reason is an ethics investigation would gut the House of Representatives led by liar Pelosi of the Democratic Party. That is how many Democrats that also are connected to the lobbying efforts of the PMA Group and Jack Murtha.

JRH 5/19/09

Monday, May 18, 2009

Homosexual Agenda Indoctrinating America’s Future


As anyone who reads here once in awhile is aware, I am a huge supporter of Biblical Morality through the filter of Christianity (I would include Judaism but frankly I have an incredible lack of knowledge of Jewish theology). An old post that I placed from AFTAH demonstrates my attitude toward homosexuality vis-à-vis Biblical Morality.

In simple terms homosexuality is the practice of either reprobate minds or deceived minds outside the box of Biblical Morality. Clearly no one is perfect; nonetheless one should strive to lead a Biblical moral life even if they miss the mark (one, two ok … many times).

I just finished an article from OneNewsNow.com entitled, “Parents fight homosexual indoctrination of kindergarteners”.

Can you imagine THIS? A government managed public education forum that is often prohibited from even mentioning the name of Christ, Bible, God or Christianity is openly indoctrinating children to accept homosexuality as normal. This is occurring to kids who may not even be able to read and write let alone comprehend the right and wrong of homosexuality and gay marriage.

I am sure there are parents in California who could care less about this indoctrination. I am also certain there are a huge amount of parents that are horrified that the government is teaching their children concepts no matter if parents agree with it or not on a social or moral back drop. After all even Left coast California has consistently voted for the definition of a marriage as between a man and a woman. Homosexual activists have been bankrolled to spread their agenda to the Courts to overcome the will of the voting people.

California’s Proposition 22 (2000) was ratified by the voters to the tune of 61% to 38% defined marriage as between a man and woman. The State Supreme Court struck that down.

In spite of a well financed homosexual campaign to message voters into accepting homosexuality as normal, the people passed California Proposition 8 to rule out same-sex marriages. The percentage was less than 2000’s 61% but it still passed with 52% of California’s voters.

There is no surprise that the homosexual agenda, secular humanist agenda and Leftists in general immediately went to California’s State Supreme Court (CSSC). The CSSC is scheduled to make a decision concerning the State Constitutionality of Proposition 8 somewhere between June 1 and 3, 2009.

By indoctrinating the young, the homosexual agenda is attempting to plow the stage with future American voters brainwashed to vilify Christian Biblical Morality. This is a classic instance of the failure of morality in America of the proper interpretation of the First Amendment as relating to religion (i.e. primarily the Christian doctrines of the Founding Fathers) and government.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (Bill of Rights)


The proper interpretation is that Congress is NOT able to make LAW establishing a STATE CHURCH nor can Congress prohibit the FREE EXERCISE of religion (again the Founding Fathers had in Christianity in mind). There is nothing in the First Amendment stipulating that religion (again the Founding Fathers’ thought is Christianity) should not be involved in government especially as religion pertains to moral foundations in a community.

One of the greatest foundations that the Left has melted away in America is the ability of schools to inculcate the religious morality of the local community. This melting has been the precursor to school violence like Columbine and teenage suicide.

You know what? The Left and the homosexual activists are aware of the old Christian proverb: “Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.” In the case of the Left it is ‘Give me your children they will be God-hating moral relativists for life.’

This is the reasoning for indoctrinating children at such a young age concerning homosexuality. If the Courts does not pop into line with the homosexual agenda, then a generation of indoctrination will produce a future homosexual-friendly voter base.

Can you say, “Subtle, sick and evil?”

JRH 5/18/09


Robert Spencer talks free speech and censorship

The British stand to band Michael Savage from Britain is an example of Islamic States and notable Muslims to reduce Western free speech to dhimmitude and in bondage to Islamic Supremacism.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Exposer of Virulent Islam



Ben’s Blog is one of my favorite sources of anti-Islamist information. The thing is “Ben” is probably a pseudonym. I also know that the same person blogs elsewhere as Dajjal. Due to the multiplicity of pseudonyms I suspect Ben/Dajjal also blog under other names or perhaps no names at all.

I can make an educated as to why Ben blogs anonymously. Ben’s knowledge of Islam/Mohammedanism is probably as good as or better than an Islamic theologian. This means Ben is likely more familiar with the tenets of Mohammedanism than is the typical Mohammedan.

Here is the thing that probably drives Leftists and Mohammedans crazy if they read Ben’s insights about Islam and Jihadism. Ben lays out the facts concerning Mohammedanism and makes conclusions that have more than a bit of animus projecting from his writing.

The animus is definitely not diplomatic yet it is accurate. I think those that might believe Ben goes a bit overboard should realize he is not writing to impress Mohammedans, rather Ben is writing to enlighten non-Mohammedans about very relevant concerns about the Theo-political elements which are intrinsic to Mohammedanism.

I have been called an Islamophobic racist by trying to be diplomatic so I can imagine the flack that Ben receives. This is probably the reason for the anonymity in Ben’s blog posts. Mohammedans do have the reputation to act out in violence to that which is perceived as offensive – real or imagined.

With all this in mind here are a couple of posts of Ben’s insight.

JRH 5/17/09