Here is some excellent advice from Citizen Warrior if you are a critic of Islam (like me) and you talk to a Leftist or a Muslim who gets franticly upset by that criticism. The anger usually translates into something like this:
· You know nothing about Islam for it is a religion of peace.
· I am a good person that worships Allah and His Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) and I am an example of a huge majority of Muslims.
· Or this one: You are a racist Muslim-hating Islamophobe.
Citizen Warrior has the balanced anti-hater way to answer these responses to criticism of Islam.
The Ben’s Blog has an awesome post pertaining Islam and the Constitution!
The post posits removing Islam as a recognized religion in America due to the ideology being just as much political as it is religious; indeed I sense that Ben’s post even wishes to eliminate the perception that Islam/Mohammedanism is a religion at all.
This post is a classic example as to why I am on the fence concerning Mohammedanism and the American Way. There are many Muslims who only practice the peaceful portions of Islam (even though those portions are abrogated by later Quranic suras). These Muslims are either reformed minded or deluded about their own theology. Actually radical Islam is practicing the letter of the Quran and Islamic traditions (which are regarded as only a little less authoritative than the Quran).
Personally I cannot see a Mainstream Media propagation tool and the current stronghold of being politically correct ever successfully removing Islam as a religion, yet it is awesome to provide the evidence as to the "why" Islam should be downgraded from a religion to a Theo-political ideological cult.
I can see why Alan Peters is receiving extreme vilification from the Americans on the Left and the Americans deceived by the messianic promises to change America into a better place in which everyone gets along (NOT).
Peters has written an essay at News Views that asks the questions about President Barack Hussein Obama’s agenda. Peters has asked the questions that dig into the “why” of the path the Democrat Party President is taking America. Peters has noticed that the “Obamabots” never answer the question, instead the Obamabots try to respond to the question by diverting to another subject (e.g. its George W. Bush’s fault or only a racist would ask those kinds of questions). The actual answer to Peters’ question NEVER comes.
The thing that does come to Peters is irrational hate for daring to question Obamasiah’s motives or past. Indeed the Mainstream Media (MSM) which has covered for BHO’s campaign to the Presidency is still believe that “Change” is a Utopia on earth that will transform America into a Leftist paradise in which Big Brother will determine wages and wealth or define the meaning of the word “Liberty.”
Alan Peters’ essay deserves a read, unless of course you are an Obamabot. If that is the case you may wish to steer clear of Peters’ essay. An Obamabot may be subject to a grand mal seizure of heartache for being exposed.
Here is an excerpt from the Patriot Post of a Mark Alexander essay pertaining to Tea Parties and the Department of Homeland Security led by its Cabinet Secretary Janet Napolitano and that Departments Report that is inclusive of American Veterans being ample targets for Right Wing extremism.
The odd pairing of the extreme Left and radical Islam apparently is part of President Barack Hussein Obama’s vision for change for America. Why is it odd to pair the Left with radical Islam? The only thing the two ideologies have in common is transforming America away from the nation’s Founding Father vision. Everything else is totally divergent.
The Left is anti-religion and anti-Biblical Morality. Thus the primary religious target for the Left is America’s predominant religion – Christianity. Christianity of the Biblical sort stands in the way of Secular Morality which validates many ways of life considered immoral by Biblical Christianity.
Islam is anti-anything that is not Islam. Islam is a supremacist theo-political ideology that enforces (i.e. retro-radical Islam) the brutality of Sharia Law.
If the Left and radical Islam succeed in that only vision that draws them together, I suspect Islam due to its radical nature will be strong enough to eradicate the Left. This is why the two ideologies are an odd pairing.
Our comrade President has placed Rosa (Bush is a War Criminal) Brooks in the Defense Department as an advisor to an Undersecretary of Defense. Brooks is closely connected to Professor Harold (Sharia Law is OK) Koh who is serving a second stint in the State Department as an advisor.
Both Brooks and Koh have direct links to billionaire George (hate America and the American Right) Soros who seems to have made it his lot in life to spend his billions on eradicating Conservative America as well as transforming America into a Leftist utopian State. The essence of the Leftist utopian State is the government managing and controlling every aspect of an individual’s life to be in line with the government plan of the day.
With socialism and befriending of American Islamists looming this should be scary stuff for American voters who deludingly voted for BHO in November 2008.
Move America Forward has sent out an e-newsletter with the details on Rosa Brooks and Professor Harold Koh. Below is that e-newsletter.
***************************************** Obama Picks Soros Aide for DoD Advisor!
Move America Forward E-newsletter Sent: Sat 4/18/2009 12:44 AM
MEET THE PENTAGON’S NEWEST ADVISOR ROSA BROOKS CALLED BUSH/CHENEY “WAR CRIMINALS”. Far Out Leftists Assuming Positions in State and Defense Departments.
Americans everywhere should be gravely concerned at the news of Obama’s latest administration appointee. Rosa Brooks, an anti-military extremist, is Barack Obama’s pick as a Pentagon advisor on issues of national security. Brooks, who will be leaving her post as a Los Angeles Times columnist, will now be advising Michele Flournoy, Undersecretary of Defense.
Obama’s pick shows an outrageous lack of concern for American safety, because Brooks is notorious for being a left wing anti-military radical. It is a well known fact that she has been an apologist for Islamic terrorists and has criticized the counterterrorism efforts of the United States and Israel!
In this article she calls President Bush and Vice President Cheney ‘war criminals’ and wonders why they are not being prosecuted for their ‘war crimes’. She then goes on to compare those of us who support the troops in the war on terror and President Bush’s policies (yes, the same policies that won in Iraq and kept this nation safe for 7 years straight) to the Serbian supporters of the international war criminal Radovan Karadzic. “Even war criminals (President Bush and VP Cheney) have fan clubs (that’s us)” she writes. This is the woman who will now be advising national security officials?
DO YOU AGREE WITH ROSA BROOKS THAT PROTECTING OURSELVES FROM TERRORISM EQUATES TO A WAR CRIME? PLEASE MAKE A DONATION TO HELP US FIGHT THIS DANGEROUS THINKING.
If you need more reason to be absolutely disgusted that Obama would appoint this woman as an advisor for the Undersecretary of Defense, where she will have the highest levels of security clearance, just take a look at this report about her associations!
OBAMA’S PENTAGON PICK HAS TIES TO RADICAL GEORGE SOROS AND “SHARI’A LAW” PROFESSOR KOH.
Rosa Brooks and Harold Koh are the WRONG PEOPLE to be advising the Pentagon and State Dept.!!
Rosa Brooks used to work as an advisor for George Soros’s Open Society Institute. Soros is the anti-American billionaire who has been supporting the left’s assault on President Bush and conservatives in America. Just a few of their stated goals are to fight “entrenched institutional racism” in America and stopping our “increasingly punitive National Security policies”.
Brooks also previously held a position as an advisor for Professor Harold Koh when he held a position in the State Department in Bill Clinton’s administration. Harold Koh himself has also been picked by Obama this time around, again, as a State Department legal advisor.
Brooks and her relationship to Koh, as well as his own appointment to a position of power in the State Department, are as suspect as Obama’s relationship to people like William Ayers and Rev. Wright! Harold Koh gained fame when he allegedly declared at a meeting of Yale alums that "…in an appropriate case, he didn't see any reason why Shari’a law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States," according to one lawyer who was present, Steven Stein.
As if that piece of information wasn’t bad enough, Koh is also a huge advocate of legal transnationalism - he advocates adopting international laws into the American system, making the laws our congress passes for us subservient to those of foreign countries.
Michael Savage the Conservative (according to BHO Administration: a possible terrorist) is upset about the Homeland Security report labeling American Military veterans returning from wars defending America’s way of life as candidates for “right wing extremists.”
Savage is suing the Barack Hussein Obama Administration in labeling all Slanted Right issues as the equivalent of right wing extremism leading toward terrorism.
Posts
