Free Speech for CAIR but NO Free Speech for Non-Muslims?

I am not a Michael Savage fan. He is more on the scale of a Right Wing Shock Jock than conservative talk radio.

However I find it disgusting that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is running a national campaign against the sponsors of his program because of anti-Mohammedan remarks. This coming from an organization that has documented ties to the infamous terrorist organization known as Hamas: Hamas is so evil that they even terrorize their fellow Arabs if they do not fall in step with their Wahhabi version of Mohammedanism.

Atlas Shrugs is calling for a boycott of products and services of the latest Savage sponsor to cave in to terror supporter CAIR – OfficeMax. You can to Atlas Shrugs to get the contact emails of OfficeMax’s top tier executives to complain about their jello spine.

I would take this boycott thing a step further. When or if you ever discover a sponsor of any program that drops a sponsorship due to CAIR, find their contact information and email or snail mail them about CAIR’s terrorist sympathies and their dream of ending American Liberty and replacing it with Sharia Law.

Elon University Poll Shows Thompson Strength

Here is some good news for Fred Thompson:

JRH 11/16/07
******************************

Elon University Poll Shows Thompson Strength

Rick Moran
November 16, 2007
American Thinker Blog

A new poll conducted by Elon University's Institute for Politics and Public Affairs of 5 southern coastal states from Florida to Virginia shows some strength for Fred Thompson.

While Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton have leads in the poll, Senator Thompson, whose numbers have been dropping like a rock for most of the last month, still maintains a strong base of support:

Of the respondents who plan to support the Democratic Party, 45 percent indicated support for Hillary Clinton. Barack Obama and John Edwards followed with 17 percent and 11 percent, respectively. Nineteen percent of Democrat supporters are undecided.

The race is much closer for the Republicans. Of the respondents who favor the Republican Party, Rudy Giuliani leads with 25 percent of their support, followed by Fred Thompson with 16 percent and Mitt Romney with 12 percent. Twenty-nine percent of Republican supporters are currently undecided.

It may very well be that Thompson's campaign troubles have bottomed out and, with the recent endorsement of the Right to Life Committee, he may be on the rebound. His staff problems behind him and a more assertive, dynamic presence on the stump lately could mean that the former Tennessee Senator is ready and willing to claim the mantle of the most viable conservative alternative to Giuliani and Romney.

He doesn't have much time. The Iowa Caucuses are in less than 60 days. And depending on when Michigan finally decides to hold its primary, New Hampshire's "First in the Nation" contest may come even earlier.

But by all reports, his fundraising efforts are going well and his new ads on immigration and one touting his conservative credentials are being well received. A sense of momentum is returning to the campaign. Whether it will be enough to dig out of the hole he excavated for himself in September and October is another question.
_______________________

© American Thinker 2007

Poll Numbers Contradict Secretary Rice

Here is some blatant evidence of Bush Administration arm twisting to force Israel into a precarious situation that will further threaten the National Security of Israel against the wishes of over 60% Israeli citizens.

Secretary of State Rice claimed recently that a majority of Israelis wish to give up the West Bank to create a Palestinian State. The poll conducted by Israel Policy Center for Promoting Parliamentary Democracy and Jewish Values in Israeli Public Life also shows that 77% of Israelis believe the Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas cannot deliver on preventing rockets being launched from the West Bank if it is converted to a Palestinian State.

That means Hamas from Gaza allowing rockets to terrorize civilian cities in southern Israel and rockets from the West Bank terrorizing civilian cities as far away as Tel Aviv through central Israel. Such an occurrence from a sovereign nation would be an act of war. So why create a Palestinian State if Israel has to defend itself by invading a sovereign Palestine to prevent harm to Israel’s citizens?

Secretary Rice is obviously utilizing propaganda to convince Jewish leaders to acquiesce to the existence of a mortal enemy known as Palestine.

JRH

Israel has NO Sovereignty of Temple Mount

Israel has NO Sovereignty of Temple Mount
According to Muslim Member of Olmert’s Cabinet

Here is a keen look at the mind of a Mohammedan.

At the Israel’s Knesset (a parliamentary version of America’s Congress) Israel’s first Mohammedan-Arab Cabinet member spoke as Minister of Science, Culture and Sport, meaning he spoke as a member of the government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.

Minister Raleb Majadle declared that he was a Muslim first and an Israeli citizen second. Furthermore Majadle respects the rule of law in Israel; however wherever Israeli law contradicts Mohammedan law, Majadle made it clear he will err on the side of Mohammedan law.

The interaction at the Knesset was between MK Aryeh Eldad and Minister Majadle concerning Mohammedan mutilation of the Temple Mount by the irresponsible Waqf (Mohammedan organization representing Jordan) that was allowed to maintain Administration of the Temple Mount after Israel re-instated their land from a victory after a Jordanian invasion in 1967.

As a representative of Prime Minister Olmert’s government; Minister Majadle maintained Israel has no sovereignty over the Temple Mount, it belongs to Mohammedans.

I don’t have a problem with Majadle’s freedom of religion in the Middle East’s only Western democracy; I feel the same way about Christianity. The problem I have is the Temple Mount should be and currently is under the sovereignty of Israel – the Homeland of all Jews who wish to live there free of government persecution due to their faith and/or race.

Another problem I have with Majadle’s statement is that Mohammedanism makes zero effort to accommodate those of Judaic or Christian faith who regard the Temple Mount of more preeminent Holiness than do Mohammedans. Mohammedans have Mecca and Medina for their principle land of Holiness. Intolerant Mohammedans should not manage the Temple Mount; it should be managed by Israel (which is way more tolerant pertaining to religious sensitivity of different religions) and open to all Jews, Christians and Mohammedans.

There comes a time when political unpleasantness demands fairness for all who have a sensitive relationship religiously to a place. When Turkish Mohammedans conquered Constantinople in 1453 they wasted no time in islamicizing the city. The Ottoman Turks renamed Constantinople into Istanbul AND one of the most venerated Cathedrals in Christendom – the Hagia Sophia – was turned into a mosque.

Israel should at the very least Judaize the Temple Mount as the Christians Christianized it and then the Mohammedans Islamicized it. I realize Israel is a secular society; however viewing the examples of Mohammedans ravenously desecrating Jewish holy sites and synagogues as the Sharon/Olmert government forced Jews to leave Gaza and immanently the West Bank, you know the promoters of a second Jewish Holocaust will Islamicize the Land Jews rebuilt after Mohammedan Arabs abandoned it to unviable use for agriculture and industry.

You have to be aware if Olmert gives up East Jerusalem in which the Wailing (Western) Wall portion of the Temple is accessible to Jews, something horrible will happen. It could be as little a taunting of refusal to allow Jews back or simply the complete archaeological elimination of every artifact that points to Jewish history. This is the very thing the Waqf is doing in their Administered portion of the Temple Mount.

HLF Mistrial: Was the Prosecution Mishandled?

Here is some analysis on the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial in which was declared a mistrial because of a hung jury.

Correspondent Erick Stakelbeck produces the opinion that the Prosecution screwed up in the presentation of the evidence. Stakelbeck believes the evidence should have been a slam dunk conviction; however a previously successful Prosecutor of terrorist villains failed to connect the evidence in the mind of the jurors. In addition Stakelbeck believes some of the jurors had their thinking in the unpopularity of President Bush combined with the thinking this is an Israeli problem not an American problem.

The thinking goes Hamas are murderers of Jews in Israel, how does that terrorism affect me. If Stakelbeck is correct then truly the Prosecution screwed up because terrorism is terror no matter the point of origin.

I would also like to point out that terrorist organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza and the Fatah dominated Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) terrorists have also directed their venom toward America. It is just that Israel is the primary object of Dar al-Islam.

Palestinian-Arabs will NEVER Recognize the Existence of Jewish State

As many of know there are scheduled negotiations to take place in Annapolis, Maryland between Israel, the Fatah version of the Palestine Authority (PA) with the Bush Administration participating as moderating negotiator.

The pre-negotiations appear to be panning out as in the past: The terrorists want all the concessions and absolutely refuse respect of Jewish Israel culture.

Olmert on the other hand appears to be ready to toss in everything including the kitchen sink under the delusion the Palestine Authority terrorists will peacefully coexist next to Israel.

Hello! The simplest hurdle that must be overcome is the recognition of the existence of Sovereign Jewish State known as Israel.

PA terrorist negotiator Saeb Erekat proclaims Palestinian Islamofascists (secular and religious) will never recognize the existence of a Jewish State.

If the President Abbas of the PA (and Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization – PLO) cannot recognize the Jewish State of Israel, why waste the time of negotiations to establish a sovereign Palestinian State?

Erekat explains the reason for this: “There is no country in the world where religious and national identities are intertwined”.

Does Erekat think the West is stupid? (Don’t answer that, of course he does.)

Every Middle Eastern Nation except Turkey intertwines Mohammedanism as the national and political identity of their citizens. If Mohammedan nations in the Middle East would deny this intertwining there would be massive rights against the respective Mohammedan nations. If Middle Eastern nations are practicing even a portion of Sharia Law then religious and national identities are one.

The PA negotiations are just a continuation of a half-century Mohammedan Arab-Palestinian lies to try to wear down the Jewish citizens in the only nation in the world they do not have to face persecution because of their Jewish race and faith (not all Jews are religious, indeed Israel is officially a secular Jewish State in which at least half the nation are Slanted Left thinkers).

And yet Olmert continues the march to Annapolis. If Olmert gives up the Jewish heritage of Jerusalem, the Temple Mount and various places revered as burial or historical Jewish event location AND accepting the PA’s demand of NOT recognizing Israel as Jewish State, then Olmert will be like Korah rebelling against Moses that ended in the perishing of Korah’s followers. Olmert’s path threatens the existence of Israel.

Peace at any cost could be the peace that leads to death.

JRH

Christian Right Political Division

Rasmussen has published the numbers within the GOP about which candidate is viewed as the most conservative to date.

My Thompson has lost ground and is at a 40% perception as a Conservative. You Thompson supporters had better start reading and sharing why Thompson would make a good President. Have an answer for a couple of black marks:

1. Thompson supported McCain/Feingold, which was a bi-partisan attempt at campaign reform. Unfortunately the reform favored Leftists more than the Slanted Right because the Right dominates grass roots campaigning via Blogs and Talk Radio. The Left controls the Mainstream Media. McCain/Feingold was not good legislation and might even be unconstitutional.

2. When Thompson revamped his staff in preparation for bigger scale Administration and planning for his campaign, he had image problems. At first he hired Spencer Abraham as the Campaign Manager. Oops Abraham is known as Jihad Spence among the Slanted Right anti-Jihadist pundits in America for his support of Arabs in his lobbying days. Thompson moved quickly to diffuse the backlash and Abraham was demoted to third on his Campaign leadership with Bill Lacy becoming the new Campaign Manager.

3. Another campaign “oops” was having friend Phil Martin involved in the campaign. Martin is a guy that has changed his life around and has become a respected businessman; however Martin has a past with drugs and a felony conviction. Once the good ole’ Mainstream Media pointed out that Thompson’s friend was a felon; Martin resigned to prevent mudslinging toward Thompson.

Amazingly Mitt Romney has a 46% rating as a perceived Conservative. Certainly Romney is a Conservative; however from a Christian Right perspective Romney’s faith as a Mormon comes into play. Most on the Christian Right view Mormonism as a cult based on Christianity yet not part of Christianity as say Roman Catholics or Eastern Orthodox are viewed as Christians.

Mormonism itself has all the moral values of Christianity (except the rogue spin-off Mormons that push polygamy); however the theology is definitely different placing more emphasis on the Book of Mormon rather than the Bible as the Word of God.

Romney as a former Governor of Massachusetts has social Conservative issues that he supported in the past but has changed his line in the present to boost a potential attraction to the Christian Right. The attraction seems to be scoring points for some on the Christian Right are beginning to endorse Romney, most significantly Weyrich and Jones.

Robertson is endorsing Giuliani to win the GOP nomination. Robertson’s endorsement could split the cohesion of the Christian Right because Giuliani is openly pro-abortion, pro-homosexual rights and made New York City a sanctuary city for illegal aliens. Zero of those aspects are amenable to the Christian Right. In fact there are those on the Christian Right which feel vehemently that Robertson and Weyrich are playing the role of Judas in the Republican Candidate selection.

My man Thompson is receiving a Christian Right organization’s endorsement allegedly in the very near future. Unnamed Republican sources are claiming the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) will announce their endorsement for Thompson tomorrow. We will see if that pans out. If indeed that happens that will be nearly as huge an endorsement for a Candidate as Robertson’s endorsement for Giuliani.

The GOP selection process is splintering the group that is responsible for electing President Bush to two terms of Office. My wonder is this: can the Christian Right re-unite when the GOP candidate is crowned as the Republican nominee for the Office of President of the United States? A disunited Christian Right could give a PR election advantage to the evil moral relativism of the Democratic Party which definitely stands for everything the Christian Right despises.