Caracastan and Islamofascism

Here is a piece I found at the Hudson Institute. Some of you may have already read it for the article is a week old; however it explores an issue that brings the War on Terror closer to home.

Everybody knows that Hugo Chavez has been globally schmoozing with Communist Castro of Cuba and Islamofascist Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran. But what you do not know is that Chavez is cavorting with global terrorists that are the enemies of America.

I know it is the 21st century and the Monroe Doctrine you may have learned about in school may be difficult to live up to; however it was difficult to live up to when it was formulated by President Monroe. Does anyone think early 19th century America was capable of keeping European Powers out of Latin America with out help?

The premise of the Monroe Doctrine needs reapplication in the 21st century, particularly as Chavez’s Anti-America doctrine is to overtly challenge America on the North and South American continents.

Am I being xenophobic? No! I am being an American that wishes to perpetuate the philosophy behind the Declaration of Independence and the Constitutional Bill of Rights. Chavez, Ahmadinejad and Islamofascist (or Islamist or whatever) terrorists represent an authoritarianism that is diametrically opposed to the Freedom and Liberty which represent American culture.

Europe has begged for American deliverance twice and America accepted the challenge. That negated the portion of the Monroe Doctrine to not meddle in European affairs. America’s National Interests are now intertwined with European decisions. The very existence of NATO is an example of that.

Nonetheless America needs to reassert the Monroe Doctrine as it applies to foreign military interventionism that affects American National Interests. In the 21st this reexamination must extend beyond European interventionism and include the potential of global conflict. This is especially the case of Islamofascist designs and agendas whether it a rogue nation or Stateless terrorists.

Army of Islam - More Deadly than Hamas?

Apparently Hamas is the big dog in the Gaza Strip (AKA Hamastan) however not an absolute power. Hamas seems to be the Primus inter pares among a committee of Sharia Law minded Mohammedans. There are other Islamofascist groups that seem to be of the harsh al-Qaeda-like mind. Indeed it is one of these groups that have the actual possession of kidnapped Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. If Shalit is even alive Israel would have to negotiate through God knows what terrorist go-betweens and not just Hamas. If Hamas acknowledges that Shalit is dead murdered, then Israel would be free to engage in a punitive military exercise (That most in the West will foolishly condemn).

Let us examine the nature of Islamofascism in the Gaza Strip courtesy of CBN News:

JRH 7/25/07

Dearbornistan: FBI Raid or FBI Public Relations?

Debbie Schlussel has been following the money with Mohammedan charities in Dearborn Dearbornistan, Michigan for some time. As you will read she has been goading the U.S. Attorney General (Stephen Murphy III) for Eastern Michigan about the terrorist supporting Mohammedan charities. Schlussel has also been goading the FBI concerning this same matter.

There is something fishy in the U.S government concerning American based Mohammedan charities and organizations. Even though we are fighting a War on Terror against Islamists, the resources of war time powers are not being executed to prevent funding from coming and going in America. What is the deal? Is this some kind of Politically Correct delusion that the Democrats have spoon fed to Federal and State Law Enforcement because treasonous acts are treated as racial or religious profiling in stead of virtually espionage against the PEOPLE and Government of the United States of America? Is this another “Denial of War” myth perpetrated by the Law Enforcement bureaucracy nation wide?

My God it steams me to think that is what the Dhimmicrats and war loser proclamationists are allowing.

JRH
*****************

BREAKING: FBI Raids Dearbornistan Hezbollah Charity, But Lets Many Others Remain Open for Biz

By Debbie Schlussel
July 24, 2007

**** UPDATE #2: FBI raids Al-Mabarat Charitable Organization and the Martyrs Foundation [SlantRight Editor: link posted below], Hezbollah Charities. BUT FBI picks Islamic Terrorist as pointman & holds apology session. ****

**** UPDATE: Making my point even more, I looked up GCO's tax returns. On its latest return, 2005, the charity reported (assuming they didn't lie and that's a big assumption) only $176,693 in funds distributed, compared with millions sent to terrorists by the charities I list below--LRD and Al-Mabarat--which the FBI allows to remain in business. FYI, GCO's officers are Mike Safiedine (of the gas-station owning Safeidine family), Hussein Hammoud (of the famous Hammoud Hezbollah supporting, cigarette-smuggler clan), and Ahmad Jaawar. When will the FBI arrest them and freeze their assets? Hazimi Accounting Service, Inc. was the charity's "accountant," FYI. ****

The FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Detroit want your kudos for raiding the Dearbornistan-based Goodwill Charitable Organization (GCO) on Warren Avenue, this morning. It is an arm of the Martyrs Foundation, funding Hezbollah, HAMAS, and Islamic Jihad, and helped fund Hezbollah in last year's Hezbollah-Israel war. It is tied to Al-Qard Al-Hassan, a terrorist-financing organization.

But while the charity is now designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Entity by the Department of Treasury, the FBI in Michigan continues to allow LIFE For Relief and Development (LRD) and Al-Mabarat Charitable Organization to remain open for business in Metro Detroit, as I've repeatedly noted on this site. LRD openly funded HAMAS to the tune of millions and is believed to be funding Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and elsewhere. Al-Mabarat is headed by Hezbollah spiritual leader Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah and sends millions back to Hezbollah in South Lebanon.

Why won't the FBI touch these? While the agency raided LRD almost a year ago, they haven't done a thing to LRD and U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III a/k/a "Abu Porno" continues to hang out with LRD officers and officials. He's refused to shut them down, while they continue to apparently fund those who blow up our soldiers.

So, while the FBI tipped off its favorite ass-kissers in the press at the Detroit Newsistan and resident Islamist Niraj Warikoo at the Detroit Free Press, and while it makes headlines, the agency is doing NOTHING when it comes to larger charities sending millions to Islamic terrorists from their Metro Detroit bases.

No kudos from me for the FBI raiding small potatoes for headlines, but turning a blind eye to major players dealing gazillions to Islamic mass-murderers of our troops and others.

While the government has frozen Goodwill Charitable Organization's assets, it refuses to do so for LRD and Al-Mabarat--like fighting one tumor only and allowing the rest of the cancer to metastasize.

FBI Special Agent Mark Green--one of the agents who works the Hezbollah beat in Michigan--I know you're reading. So why won't you raid Al-Mabarat and freeze its assets? Is this part of a deal with Sheikh Fadlallah not to make waves?
_________________________

UPDATE: Finally, FBI Raids Al-Mabarat Hezbollah Charity in Dearbornistan; But FBI Holds Apology-Fest w/ Muslims; Raids Staged to Help Abu Porno Judicial Nomination?

By Debbie Schlussel
July 24, 2007

For over a year, I've been asking why the FBI hasn't raided Al-Mabarat Charitable Organization-USA, Inc., the Dearbornistan charity that is openly raising money for Hezbollah and which is headed by Hezbollah Spiritual Leader Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah.

But, today, just as I was asking that once again, the FBI was actually raiding Al-Mabarat, while it was also raiding Goodwill Charitable Organization and the Martyrs Foundation. Well, it's about time.

YEAH. AND FINALLY. Too bad they didn't lift a finger when these charities were all funding Hezbollah's war on Israel, last year, murdering countless Israeli soldiers and civilians. Al-Mabarat raised about $1 million in revenue in 2004, its last year of tax filing, all of which was sent to Hezbollah. And FYI, its Dearbornistan-based officers are Fouad T. Beydoun, Ahmad J. Bazzi, and Nazem Baydoun, of the Hezbollah operative Beydoun/Baydoun and Bazzi/Bazzy families from South Lebanon.

BUT . . . unfortunately, the FBI is holding an apology-fest with extremist Muslim leaders. Can you imagine J. Edgar Hoover holding an apology session with Al Capone's fellow mob family members? And unfortunately, the FBI tipped off Islamic Terrorist Imad Hamad, making him their community point man (that means that charity members were tipped off ahead of time, too; bet on it). Imagine J. Edgar Hoover making one Gambino family member the point man for a raid on another Gambino member:

A search warrant was executed at the Goodwill office, according to Imad Hamad, regional director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. . . .

Also, the FBI is holding a meeting this afternoon with Muslim leaders at the Islamic House of Wisdom in Dearborn Heights to discuss the raids, according to Dawud Walid, head of the Michigan branch of the Council on American Islamic Relations.

The meeting will include Imam Mohammed Elahi [DS: an agent of Iran and Hezbollah], who heads the mosque, and Walid.

If I were in the Iranian government or Hezbollah, I'd be LMAO (laughing my ass off) at the stupid Federal Bureau of Infidels, my dhimmis.

So why are all these raids finally taking place, today? Why now after so long?

Well, it's more about politics than morals and more of a show than reality. If the FBI were truly going to do the right thing, they'd have raided and shut down these charities long ago. But I've been critical of U.S. Attorney Stephen Murphy III a/k/a "Abu Porno," the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, and written about his cozying up to Hezbollah and other Islamic terrorist groups and their local enablers. He wants his Bush nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, and the Hezbollah stuff I've exposed has hurt his chances. This is his way to beef up support and credentials to refute me. Nice try, but no cigar, Abu Porno.

Pope Benedict’s Outrageous Announcement

Lee Grady’s summation of Pope Benedict’s recent announcement:

Only Catholics are true Christians.

Other Christian denominations are “not true churches.”

All non-Catholics lack the “means of salvation.”

(J.) Lee Grady has been the Big Dog Editor of Charisma Magazine since 1999. I am guessing that tags Grady as a Protestant-Charismatic-Evangelical. I guess I would tag myself as a Charismatic-Pentecostal-Word_of_Faith (past roots however modified today)-Christian_Mystic kind of guy these days.

Grady reacted to the Pope’s announcement with clear hostility reminiscent of the Protestant VS Catholic hostility that gained equal ground after Martin Luther’s 95 Thesis in 1517. In fact Grady titled his online rebuttal as “Pope Benedict’s Outrageous Announcement.”

Assuredly the Pope’s announcement opens all the old wounds (not just with Protestants but with the Eastern Orthodox Church as well) about Papal infallibility, Heaven and Hell and Purgatory, the true Faith and so on and on. I am guessing Pope Benedict XVI knew full well his proclamation would resound in denunciation from non-Catholic Christians. I got to say this for the old holy fella: Benedict is not exactly Politically Correct in his public pronouncements. The Pope enraged Muslims not too long ago by quoting 14th-century Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleologus:

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

Even before that speech in 2006, Mohammedan elitists had considered Pope Benedict XVI as an Islamophobe that stretches back to his Cardinal days. The Pope has opposed the entry of Turkey into the European Union based primarily that Mohammedan culture is different than European Culture that has its heritage in Christianity.

Thus the Pope’s recent announcement is a jaw dropper (as Grady wrote) to Protestants of a Western Heritage. Protestants were beginning to view Benedict XVI as a huge Christian Leader willing to eschew the popularity of being Politically Correct to telling it like it is about Mohammedanism. I began to view the Pope as the defender of the Faith because of his conservative stand.

Since the papal announcement probably has opened old wounds expect to hear and read an increase from Protestants that the Papacy is the Anti-Christ and the hills of Rome are correspondent to Scripture written Revelation or Daniel and so on. It could get ridiculous (and it could be true as much as any Biblical speculation).

As a person from a Protestant background (I mean I am absolutely clueless to the ritual thing of Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestant Episcopate Churches), I recommend reacting in a What Would Jesus Do (WWJD) manner. Catholic and Protestant attitudes ebb and flow according to the leadership that is most influential at the time. Even though Pope Benedict XVI is the top dog in the Roman Catholicism, Catholicism is not exactly a paradigm unified agreement. Tradition demands to at least offer lip service to the Pontiffs commands. There is NO top dog in Protestantism. Protestants are an amalgam of various statements of Faith that range along denominational and independent lines. Let’s see off the top of my head: Pentecostal Denominations (Assembly of God, Foursquare, Church of God, Open Bible Standard and more); there are the High Protestant Churches (Lutheran, Anglican/Episcopalian, Baptists, Methodist, Presbyterian and more) and there are the Independents – a combination of dissatisfied High Church attendees and Pentecostal/Charismatic attendees that chose to be independent (many of these have nearly become a domination via association; e.g. RHEMA Churches, Word of Faith Churches; Renewal Churches). Most Independent Protestants tend to be Pentecostal/Charismatic in operation.

I have to mention there are a few Independent Protestant Churches I have a hard time with because their statement of faith is often fringe/racist/anarchist types. Then there are those who consider themselves Christian Churches but deny one point or the other of the one thing that unites Roman Catholic, Protestant and Eastern Orthodox theology: the Trinity (ONE GOD yet three Persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit; and that Jesus Christ is both human in the incarnated flesh and God – both natures are present and are ONE). Some of the Independents that have a different view of the Godhead I waver from admiration to thinking they are heretics, thus I won’t get into naming Christians.

So what is my point?

There will NEVER be Christian unity under the guidance of humanity, that day of Unity occurs at the Parousia (Second Coming) of Jesus Christ as King of kings and Lord of lords.

So do not be hostile to Pope Benedict XVI merely because he says the Catholic way is the only way. The True Way is the Christ Way (John 14: 6-11) which involves the God-Kind of Love for the fellow Believer, Neighbor and enemy alike. Who is our Neighbor and how should we treat them? The Good Samaritan is about the Neighbor (Luke 10: 25-37). Acts of kindness and forgiveness (Matt. 5: 38-48) should be projected on our enemies (God sets in authority those do His Will in protection and discipline [Romans 13: 1-7, Jeremiah 25: 8-11 and 1 Peter 2: 13-16)]. And make every effort to settle differences between those you fellowship with (Offender – Matt. 5: 23-26 and Offended – Matt. 18: 15-17).

Under the Light of Christ is Pope Benedict’s announcement to occupy the Christian mind as outrageous? I tend to think not. Move on to more Heavenly minded things to think on.

One last thought I should like to point out. Benedict’s announcement that the Catholic way is the only will certainly have an affect on Protestants and Eastern Orthodox Church in which the reaction should be to pray for the Pontiff. One thing you will not be seeing in nations of Christian Heritage is the Christians pouring into the streets demanding death to the Pope. You will not see Protestant and Eastern Orthodox Christians beheading Catholics due to an offensive announcement. You will not see Catholics pouring into the streets burning down Protestant and Eastern Orthodox Church buildings. The Christian world has moved on from that barbaric medieval thinking.

I wonder which religion of peace I can contrast this Christian reaction too?

LIBERALS: GENERAL PATRAEUS MUST BE DESTROYED

I was reading an article by John Hawkins posted at Right Wing News. The article was entitled, “General Patraeus Must be Destroyed.”

Now I have to tell you that struck me as a strange title coming from a Website called Right Wing News. And that was probably the purpose: to get my attention.

The reason Hawkins wrote article is because General Patraeus granted an interview to Hugh Hewitt -–a sort of a right winger. Evidently Hewitt wrote his article about the interview about the Lefties already attacking the integrity of General Patraeus. Hawkins’ point being Patraeus had better begin solid preparation because he is due to appear before the Senate to present a high profile report on the effectiveness of the Troop Surge to date.

Since the Democrats and the Left view the road to attain power is destroying the War credibility and thus the ability to enforce a Slanted Left agenda in America by losing the War on Terror. It becomes incumbent to assassinate the character of General Patraeus. The forefront of this effort will be the Mainstream Media (MSM), the darlings of the Democratic Party due to a mutual hatred not only of a Bush Agenda to promote American National Interests but of the Christian Right Conservatives largely responsible for two Bush elections.

Patraeus needs to especially prepare an awesome indisputable report due to the growing unpopularity of President Bush even among his constituent Conservative Republicans. Without supreme results to report to counter the gloom of the MSM, the Democrats controlling both Houses of Congress will declare Victory unattainable ergo America has lost the War on Terror in Iraq. A Democratic announcement of losing in Iraq will certainly lead to declaring a loss in Afghanistan. If a Democratic Party nominee is elected to the Presidency in 2008 (God forbid), a Taliban/al-Qaeda victory will be declared in Afghanistan. If that happens look to the rapid disintegration of not only Afghanistan, but also nuclear armed Pakistan as Musharraf will submerged in the pathetic victory frenzy of Islamofascists.

Everybody knows that Iran will make a move on Shi’ite aligned Iraq and Turkey will make a move on the Kurd controlled portion of Iraq due to their unreasonable hatred of allowing a Kurdistan State to emerge.

Side Bar: Isn’t it interesting most of the unrest in the Middle East from the Mohammedan view is because a Jewish sliver of land has National Sovereignty while a group of Arabs that did not even become known as Palestinians until the 1960’s wished also to have a Sovereign National State. (The original U.N. plan was to have Transjordan [now Jordan] be the home of an Arab State and Jews in a microscopic portion of land to have their own National State.) Instead the Arab Mohammedans which attacked Israel (Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, Egypt, Syria and other lesser Arab States) had lost. Before Israel against the Arab Mohammedan world war began, Arabs residing in the Israel portion of the U.N. partition fled believing that their Arab brothers were about to execute a Jewish blood bath. After the blood bath these Arabs thought they would return. As History shows the Arab Mohammedan world LOST against a sliver of Jews determined to have their own National Homeland.

Now here is the point: Mohammedan (or variations thereof) Kurds are also a Stateless people that have been persecuted by Turks, Arabs and Iranian/Persians for years. What will be the excuse for denying the emergence of a State called Kurdistan? End of Side Bar.

If a Democratic Party controlled Congress forces a redeployment (leaving the job unfinished to the detriment of American National Interests and probably leading to global chaos), it will simply mean the West and America will have to come back manage and overcome the chaos that will follow with Islamofascist control of oil.

Another element is Russia, China and India.

Russia cannot stand for American power to be so close to their regional hegemonic order. Russia will do all it can to perpetuate Mohammedan chaos.

China is a growing economy with a huge emerging global influence. Oil may be seen as the key to cement a Chinese Superpower in the world. China is wary of American hegemonic power yet America’s economy may aid China to its economic goals market wise. On the other hand if China perceives America wanting to control the global markets, they out of necessary National Interests will side with Russia in destabilizing the Middle East.

Ever since India gained independence from the British Raj in 1948, they have been cozy with the old Soviets and somewhat the new Russians. Yet India’s greatest enemy is nuclear armed Pakistan. India and Pakistan was once one region that was divided by Muslim and Hindi majorities (Bangladesh was once East Pakistan part of the Pakistani government). Ever since that 1948 split India and Pakistan have warred and battled over disputed lands that both claim. India has been flirting with both Russia and America probably trying to feel which nation will best serve India’s National Interests. I guarantee you that India will not stand idly if Musharraf falls and Pakistan falls into the hands of psycho-Islamofascists. India has a history of Muslims maiming, torturing and murdering Hindus that did not convert to Mohammedanism.

Americans need to know and be aware that American influence and a presence in the Middle East will stave off a worse chaos than does exist in the present. If only Democrats and Republicans/Liberals and Conservatives could catch the vision that a new paradigm needs to exist in confronting this minority Islamist movement. Remember America’s Revolutionary War was only actively supported by a third of the colonists. Another third of the colonists were staunch British supporters considering themselves British citizens in the Thirteen Colonies. Then there was the third that just wanted to live life, that third experienced Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness via the sweat and blood of the active Revolutionaries.

Do not think for a minute that in the back of the mind of a so-called Moderate Mohammedan in the Middle East there is a yearning for a successful Islamist revolution that will restore honor, prestige and glory that was experienced in the yesteryear by the initiation of a man called the prophet Mohammed.

The American Slanted Left has an agenda and vision as well. Do not think for one minute (again) the Slanted Left are a bunch of overt traitors. The Slanted Left love America as much as the Slanted Right. America’s problem is a polarized vision.

The Slanted Left wish a society more in line with the European mind-set of egalitarian democracy that leans toward a government managed social utopia.

The Slanted Right in America wish a society founded on the principles of the Founding Fathers underlined with a morality that finds its foundation in Judeo-Christianity.

Actually both agendas are utopian in nature. And both agendas are willing to be vicious to find their goal - a sort of Machiavellian the means support the ends. The Christian Right feels that if the Slanted Left operates unhindered morality will devolve into egalitarian hedonism and Sodom and Gomorrah sin. That slant is horrific to a Bible believing Christian. There are so-called “progressive” Christians that pick and choose Biblical Scriptures to fit Secular Humanism - that is hypocrisy. Progressive Christians should stand up and say we do not believe in the man/God Christ but in a Christian diluted philosophy that leads to the Secular Humanistic Gospel of Inclusion.

The Slanted Left will lie to accomplish there agenda of American transformation. The inclusion in that lying is that the War on Terror is bogus which will include a smear campaign on General Patraeus before his September Report on the progress of the Troop Surge.

Prepare Patraeus, prepare!

Radio host condemned for 'Islam is a cult'

The Council on American-Islamic Religion (CAIR) is criticizing Radio Talk Show host Neil Boortz for calling Islam Mohammedanism a cult. The insinuation is that Boortz participated in a hate crime against Mohammedanism.

Boortz was harsh nonetheless every single word he said was factual truth. He merely shed the bonds of being Politically Correct and told it like it is.

More and Americans of public and Intelligencia status are beginning to eschew the shackles of Politically Correctness. Recently Dr. Don Boys Ph.D. wrote an article condemning Islamist thinking and the seeming support from so-called Moderate Mohammedans.

JRH 7/20/07
***************************

Radio host condemned for 'Islam is a cult'
CAIR cites Neil Boortz for angry confrontation of Muslim caller

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted: July 19, 2007 6:40 p.m. Eastern

A controversial Washington-based Islamic lobby group today is highlighting as "Islamophobia" a heated radio talk-show exchange in which host Neil Boortz tells a Muslim caller Islam is a "cult," not a religion.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (SlantRight Editor: Always verify CAIR with Anti-CAIR or CAIR Watch) said in its daily e-mail dispatch today an audio clip of the conversation – the date is not indicated – "is circulating on anti-Muslim Internet hate sites."

A copy of the clip was posted on YouTube.com Oct. 8, 2006.

The caller began: "Sir, I'm calling because of some statements you've been making in the past week about the religion of Islam and … "

Boortz interrupted: It's a cult, it's not even a religion. … "

After a long list of crimes perpetrated all over the world in the name of Islam, the talk host told the caller, "You don't have a word of condemnation in you until the non-Islamic world rises up and starts to make it clear that we are fed up with your damned religion. We've had it up to here.

"And somebody, like I said yesterday, somebody needs to grab the Muslim world by the shirt collar, backhand it a good one, knock it into the damn corner and say straighten up or we're gonna eradicate you beetles from the face of the Earth. … "

CAIR asked its constituents not to contact Boortz, because he "can and will use any comments to further defame Islam and Muslim."

"This clip was offered only to demonstrate the growing level of Islamophobic rhetoric in our society," the group said.

CAIR, which brands itself as a mainstream promoter of civil rights, has been named with two other prominent U.S. Islamic groups as an "unindicted co-conspirator" in a plot to fund the terrorist group Hamas. Jury selection is underway for the trial in Dallas.

CAIR is a spinoff of the defunct Islamic Association for Palestine, launched by Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzook and former university professor Sami al-Arian, who pleaded guilty last year to conspiracy to provide services to Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Several CAIR staffers have been convicted on terrorism-related charges, and CAIR founder Omar Ahmad allegedly told a group of Muslims they are in America not to assimilate but to help assert Islam's rule over the country.
________________________
Copyright 1997-2007 All Rights Reserved. WorldNetDaily.com Inc.

More cases of terrorists 'baking' children cited

As part of my ever growing campaign to illustrate to the Appeasement Politically Correct mind-set of the West, here is some more information exposing the brutal nature of the religion of peace. Keep in mind violence, murder by homicide and suicide as well as acts of desecrating cruelty are a part of the Mohammedan holy writings. This includes the Quran, Hadith, Sharia Law and more. This is something that reaches beyond the cruelty of power of a cruel megalomaniac dictator or leader (government, tribal or religious). The hate and violence is interwoven into the fabric of the matrix of Mohammedanism. The example was set by its pseudo-prophet who may have been a charismatic schizophrenic hearing voices or a demonized individual listening to voices (depending on your belief system that you are free to believe in America).

So here is an update of what is going among Mohammedans today and yesteryear: