Western Funds to PA Diverted For Weaponry

Here is a bit of information that I doubt will be on the Evening News near you, nor on the front page of your local newspaper. The fact is this should be major news! Liberals in both American and the EU both support the PA financially. Arafat was a Hitler disguised as a Mohammedan Arab. Currently Hamas is the equivalent of the Gestapo posing as Mohammedan Arabs. In both cases Western money is being funneled to these genocidal terrorists in the name of Appeasement. Money that was and is supposed to be used for peaceful civilian operations is used in fact to buy guns and ammunition to murder Jews and Americans.

The details can be read at Slantright.com.

Terrorism Talk at American Universities

The American Thinker deserves a big hat tip! Steven M. Warshawsky has penned what I consider a dynamic exposition of the University of California at Irvine. This University is allowing its local "Muslim Student Union" to speak evil of Israel and Judaism. This is happening on American soil! The Mohammedans at this University are sponsering a conference that denigrates everything America is attempting to do in the Middle East by glorifying horrendous terrorists such as Hamas. They are actively belittling Jews by comparing self-preservation of a nation - the Land Israel - to the holocaust, a holocaust of Palestinian-Arabs is the conference's message.

The Palestinian-Arab is an Arab. The Arabs have huge amounts of Middle Eastern lands and nations that are not Biblically their own. Yet Israelis would gladly sacrifice their heritage for peace on an extremely small sliver of Land that is their ancient heritage.

It is pure wickedness for the University of California at Irvine to allow such an action to take place on American soil!

Below is the scathing report by Warshawsky:
***************************

Can we tolerate terror talk?

This week, the Muslim Student Union of the University of California at Irvine is sponsoring an anti-Israel, pro-terror conference titled “Holocaust in the Holy Land.” (hat tip: David Horowitz) The conference includes presentations on such topics as “Hamas: The People’s Choice”; “Zionism Hijacking Judaism”; “Israel: The 4th Reich”; and “Islamic Palestine.”

Note the double entendre of the use of the word “holocaust” in the conference title, which not only refers to the bogus claim that Israel is perpetuating a holocaust on Palestinians, but harkens to the real holocaust yet to come once Iran – hence, militant Islam – obtains nuclear weapons.

The featured speaker at the conference is Norman Finkelstein, a notorious academic who has made a career out of anti-Semitic Israel bashing. He is much beloved by Islamic radicals and neo-Nazis alike.

Other speakers include Iman Mohammad Al Asi, a senior member of the Institute of Contemporary Islamic Thought, which is dedicated to promoting the “global Islamic movement” as “an alternative worldview to that of western civilization.”

Think about that mission statement for a moment. Here is the Islamic challenge laid bare. Nothing less than “western civilization”—including political, economic, religious, and artistic freedom; female emancipation and sexual freedom; and a predominantly secular, individualistic society – is at stake in this conflict.

And make no mistake, this is about much more than Muslim antipathy for Jews and Israel. Islamic fomenters like Al Asi are just as opposed to “imperialist Christians” as they are to “Zionist Jews.” They might hide their beliefs and ambitions behind elaborate religious dogma, but their ultimate message rings loud and clear: “committed Muslims” (i.e., radical Islamists) must consolidate their hold over the Middle East, expel Jews and Christians from their midst, and fight to expand Islamic influence and control across the globe. In other words, violence and terrorism is their religious duty, and peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims, an impossibility.

Another speaker at the conference is Amir Abdel Malik Ali. He will be lecturing on “Israel: The 4th Reich” and “Islamic Palestine.” It is quite obvious what his “perspective” is. Malik Ali is a well-known purveyor of anti-semitic hate speech. He has brought his particular brand of “thinking” to U.C. Irvine before, when he called for a “one-state” solution to the Israeli-Palestinian problem – in which Muslims prevail.

U.C. Irvine officials have steadfastly refused to condemn the conference. Instead, they hide behind facile notions of free speech and equal treatment to avoid confronting the ugly reality that militant Islam is alive and well on America’s college campuses—and using American freedoms to propagate an ideology that is adamantly opposed to the basic fabric of our society.

David Horowitz rightly notes

“if anyone doubted that the situation on our campuses was dangerous, this little event should be a wake up call.”

Mexico Threatens Suits Over Guard Patrols

Incredible! Mexico will sue over issues relating to illegal alien Mexican citizens entering America. Like Mexico has the right to send illegal immigrants to America! The suggestion that Mexico can file a civil suit against the American government on how the United States prevents Mexican citizens from entering the American homeland is ludicrous. Maybe America should file a civil suit against Mexico for the entire illegal drug and human trafficking that affects American lives. Perhaps America should sue Mexico directly for not actively preventing Mexicans from entering illegally. Are Americans aware that Mexico actually promotes its citizens to enter America? The reason is the money Mexican citizens make in America is brought back to Mexico's corrupt economy for the benefit of Mexican citizens. This is a flow of money to Mexicans and out of America and back to Mexico. A Mexican civil suit implies this is the inalienable right of Mexicans.

Another question begs to be answered: In what court will the American government be sued? Certainly Mexico has no right to sue in American Courts over American foreign policy? Will Mexico challenge the American government in an international court as in The Hague World Court? Will Mexico use its own court system to institute a civil suit against America? What a laugh that a corrupt government as Mexico can sue America.

Unfortunately some liberal Democrat or liberal Judge or Justice will comply and allow Mexico to civilly usurp American Sovereignty for the sake of global humanity. God help America if that is the case.

NRO Symposium Review on Bush Illegal Alien Speech

The NRO is a conservative publication. Many of commentators of the NRO try to look for the silver lining in President Bush's Monday night speech an a plan to deal with illegal immigration, however the consensus seems to be that the President is lacking and late with answers to the problem.

My opinion is that President Bush's response to illegal immigration is a failed policy. The President tosses the rights of actual citizens in favor of potential citizens. Many of these potential citizens are people who don't want citizenship yet wish to enjoy the benefits of citizenship with compliance to American law. Many are in America to make money for families back home in Mexico. This is laudable if done legally, it is horrible if done at the expense of true American taxpayers.

Many of the illegal aliens are simply just criminals involved in some form of criminal activity from drugs to human trafficking.

The President has to come up with a plan that American citizens can support, not a plan that supports the opinions and lifestyles non-citizen illegal aliens.

Failed Leadership, on the Eve of Bad Immigration Policy

Tonight in just a few minutes, the President of the United States will address the American people on illegal immigration issues. I am fascinated on what the President has to offer because so far, George W. has failed America on illegal immigrants.

Offering amnesty to millions of illegals out of political correctness or the potential wooing of a future electorate is a failed policy that falls far short of citizens that are already voters by natural birth or by earned naturalization.

I am still a President Bush fan, but I cannot defend him on many of his public statements and hints toward public policy on illegal immigrants. Illegal immigration has played into the hand of a minority of radical hispanics who come to America not to better themselves, but rather to energize a "Reconquista" of the American Southwest. For these Reconquistas illegal immigration is about flooding America with a Latino counter-culture that will overrun American roots.

The Reconquista is about anti-assimilation. Assimilation has been the cornerstone of immigration to America. America's great melting pot of many has become one english speaking nation. To disregard the American heritage by imposing spanish or arabic as alternative languages to accomodate those that refuse assimilation is a travesty.

I received an email from Steven Voigt, a conservative Christian lawyer. He has an eloquent opinion on illegal immigration.

An Open Letter to America About Failed Leadership, on the Eve of Bad Immigration Policy
PHILADELPHIA, May 14 /Christian Newswire/ The following is an open letter from Steven T. Voigt, Foundations of Law PAC Executive Director:

Dear Fellow Americans,

On the eve of the President’s speech on illegal immigration and facing the imminent reincarnation of the Senate’s three-tiered amnesty proposal, I write to you again on this important issue. Illegal immigration is indeed the topic of the day, but illegal immigration is but a symptom of the greater issue we face – a crisis of failed leadership on both sides of the aisle in the Senate.

We are a good-hearted and trusting people. Only a few short years ago, as the seat of power of Congress and the White House changed hands, we looked to the future as one of promise. We lifted our heads to the horizon with optimism.

We believed that – at long last – America was on the right path, and we trusted in our elected leaders to take us down the road with humble confidence. Our leaders would surely stand tall for our nation. They would protect the Constitution. They would fight for traditional family values. They would lessen government bureaucracy and allow capitalism to shine. They would curtail the overreaching judiciary and take legislative decisions out of the courtroom and return them to our communities. They would uphold the rule of law, and they would protect our sovereignty. They would rally the international community behind our leadership. The future was indeed bright.

Today, through nothing we have done except to trust in the ballot box, we find ourselves betrayed – and mired in much the same spot as we stood several years ago, with dark clouds shrouding the horizon that we once gazed on with such promise. Our optimism of years past is muted, and we are left with frustration and disappointment in our leaders.

Friends, mediocrity may be fine in some parts of the world – but not here in ...

To read the rest go HERE.

Going On Vacation

I will be vacationing until after Mother’s day.
I will back to the blog Monday.
I hope you all miss me.

Palestinian Cleric Calls Christians Subjects of Satan

Hamed Al-Tamimi, director of inter-religious dialogue for the PA's Judicial Council has posted an anti-Christian diatribe on the Palestine Authority official website.

WorldNetDaily reports that Al-Tamimi said,

“Christians who support Israel are distorting their true faith, have adapted Satan as god and comprise the greatest danger to world peace”.

What a deceived person Al-Tamimi has become. Mohammedanism is one of the most satanic death-cults in existence on the planet. The pseudo-prophet Mohammed received a revelation from an angel of light he purported to be Gabriel (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15). That would place Mohammedanism as a cult that follows Satan. Indeed, Mohammedanism as fomented by the Muslim Brotherhood (which influences Hamas), Wahhabism (Saudi Arabia) and Shi’ite Messianism are the greatest threats to world peace.

Here are some more inflammatory words from Al-Tamimi:

"Christian Zionists are a group who adopted Satan as god who drives their crazy nature. They have praised depravity and cursed virtue, they have turned the moral scale upside down and have reached [a point] in which forgery, deception and lying have turned into descriptions of world policy, which is led by the Zionism on both its branches – the Jewish and the Christian."

The very things accuse Christians of are the very things Mohammedans find virtue. Mohammedans are depraved; they enslave women for sexual gratification and kill them when a woman seeks the same. The Shi’ites Mohammedans are given the proper way in which to have sex with animals (Khomeini’s "Tahrirolvasyleh”). The art of deception and lying is codified under Mohammed and called al-Taqiyya.

It is not Christians who support the return of Jews to their national homeland that are depraved, it is self-deluded Mohammedans like Al-Tamimi. The thing that is more disturbing is that Americans and Europeans support the Palestine Authority that publishes such obvious anti-Christian hatred. The Palestinian-Arab gets away with it and Jews and Christians are vilified.